Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 224279

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : QC19 - QC22 Full Version

Association between Intrapartum Cardiotocography and Umbilical Cord Blood pH in Term Pregnancies: A Cross-sectional Study in a Tertiary Care Centre, Kolkata, India


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51835.15965
Roshni Sethia, Animesh Naskar, Saikat Tripathy, Rupkamal Das

1. Junior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Animesh Naskar,
Krishna Bihar, Flat-201, 2nd Floor, 10, Baje Shibpur, 2nd Bye Lane, Shibpur,
Howrah-711102, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: animesh282@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Labour, a physiological process for majority of foetuses, often acts as a challenge to foetal reserves causing foetal hypoxia. Foetal monitoring with intrapartum cardiotocography is an important tool to enable timely intervention to reduce adverse neonatal outcomes like postnatal cerebral palsy.

Aim: To determine an association between cardiotocography tracing and umbilical artery cord blood pH in term pregnancies in labour where the influence of drugs and the presence of other co-morbid medical/obstetric adverse outcomes have been ruled out.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, hospital-based, observational study involved singleton uncomplicated term pregnancies with a normal baseline cardiotocography and spontaneous labour onset and progression admitted to the Labour Ward of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, of R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Intrapartum continuous cardiotocography traces were recorded and those showing abnormal traces were documented and delivery expedited within two hours. Total of 90 such consecutive women were included in the study and umbilical arterial cord blood sample was taken for all these pregnancies immediate postpartum. Cardiotocography traces were then statistically compared with cord blood parameters and the findings were computed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 22.0.

Results: Out of 90 participants, the mean age was 24.21±3.43 years, most (43, 47.8%) of them were in between 21 to 25 years. Of the abnormal traces, 51 (56.7%) were NICE Category II (suspicious) and 39 (43.3%) were NICE category III (pathological). Cord blood analysis revealed that 40% had a pH value <7.0, 44.4% had blood lactate levels above 6 mmol/L and another 47.7% had a base deficit ≥12 mmol/L. On cross-tabulation and Chi-square analysis, these were all found to be statistically significant (p-value <0.05). Abnormalities of Foetal Heart Rate (FHR) and baseline variability had higher Odds ratio of predicting umbilical artery acidemia with Odd’s ratio for baseline variability abnormality as high as 2.768.

Conclusion: Although there has been a rising trend towards operative deliveries, the overall incidence of neonatal morbidity due to cerebral palsy is still on the rise. Cardiotocography can be a very important tool to identify neonatal acidosis in “at risk” foetuses and helps in timely intervention giving long term best outcomes.

Keywords

Cord blood analysis, Foetal acidosis, Foetal heart rate

Labour is a stressful event for the foetus (1). When a vigorous foetus enters labour and there is successive development of hypoxia, foetal monitoring with cardiotocography can be an important tool to enable timely intervention and delivery of a healthy child (1). Blood gas and lactate analysis of the umbilical cord blood during the first minutes of life is a useful and inexpensive way of quantifying, objectively the occurrence of hypoxia or acidosis just prior to birth (2).

It is theorised that intrapartum cardiotocography can detect foetal hypoxia and/or acidosis allowing timely intervention to reduce adverse neonatal outcomes such as postnatal cerebral palsy (3). To involve intrapartum hypoxia/acidosis as the reason of cerebral palsy in term infants, there is a requirement to document the existence of metabolic acidosis in umbilical artery cord blood (2).

Over the years, there has been a lot of work on the validity of electronic foetal monitoring and how it correlates with foetal outcome in high-risk pregnancies. However, it has been observed that the apparently “low-risk” cohort of pregnancies contributes more significantly to perinatal morbidity and mortality. Very few studies have been conducted that aim to quantify foetal hypoxia in these low-risk settings (3),(4),(5). The present literature is sparse when it comes to providing sufficient statistical power to explore the relationship between intrapartum FHR patterns and neonatal acidemia with an adjustment for several confounders including important maternal co-morbidities and the effect of intrapartum drugs and analgesia (3).

The main purpose of the present study was to help identify these apparently low-risk foetuses at the brink of impending acidosis so as to deliver them at “the window of opportunity”, before severe neurological damage sets in. The aim of the present study was to establish an association between cardiotocography and umbilical artery cord blood pH in term pregnancies in labour where the influence of drugs and presence of other co-morbid medical/obstetric adverse outcomes have been ruled out.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional, hospital-based, observational study conducted over a period of 18 months from January 2019 to June 2020 in the Labour Ward of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Ethical clearance was obtained through proper channel from the Institutional Review and Ethics Committee vide memo no. RKC/295.

Inclusion criteria: Singleton pregnancy, maternal age 15 to 30 years, term gestation (gestational age: 37 to 41+6 weeks), cephalic presentation, spontaneous onset and progress of labour, normal baseline cardiotocography and those who had given informed consent for the study, patients admitted during the study period for safe confinement were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women with preterm premature rupture of the membranes, premature rupture of the membranes, oligo/polyhydramnios, pregnancies with induced or augmented labour (use of oxytocics), high-risk gestations (anaemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, asthma), multifoetal gestation and malpresentations were excluded from the study. Women undergoing elective Cesarean (C)-section, foetuses with congenital anomalies and diagnosed foetal growth restriction, documented abnormal umbilical doppler study and abnormal baseline cardiotocography, pregnant women with antepartum haemorrhage, placental abruption etc., were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The study “Intrapartum cardiotocography and its association with umbilical cord blood pH in term pregnancies: a prospective study” by Ray C and Ray A conducted over the Indian population showed a (4):

**52.5% incidence of foetal acidosis in those with pathological cardiotocography trace

**22.7% incidence of foetal acidosis in those with suspicious cardiotocography trace.

At a confidence interval of 95% and the power of the study set at 80%, cord blood pH <7.0 was chosen as the primary outcome measure and the sample size for the present study was calculated as:

n is the sample size

Zα is the confidence interval i.e., 1.96 for 95%

Zβ is the power of the study i.e., 0.84 for 80%

P1 is prevalence of foetal acidosis in those with pathological cardiotocography i.e., 0.525

P2 is prevalence of foetal acidosis in those with suspicious cardiotocography i.e., 0.227

It was thus calculated that a total of 82 women would be required for the study.

A further 10% was included to account for missing data/technical failures. Overall, it was estimated that 90 women should be recruited for the purpose of the study and considering the daily admission rate, it will be possible to achieve this number within the stipulated study period.

Study Procedure

Over the period of study, women with uncomplicated term gestation were enrolled as per the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study. After enrolment, every pregnant mother was subjected to a routine physical and obstetrical assessment along with ultrasonographic examination of placenta, foetal well being and biometry. Labour was monitored through partography and continuous intrapartum cardiotocography. Details regarding patient profile, history, gestational age at onset of labour, phase of labour (active or latent), state of membranes on admission, characteristics of liquor after rupture of membranes, cardiotocographs, details of termination and delivery, baby records and cord blood analysis were recorded in study proforma sheets. Pregnancy was neither augmented nor induced and was allowed to progress spontaneously.

Intrapartum continuous cardiotocography was performed using departmental monitor machine BPL FM9852 EF. Traces were recorded at a speed of 1 cm/min.

Foetal heart rate patterns were interpreted using the NICE 2017 guidelines. All cardiotocography traces were studied by a single trained personnel so as to eliminate interobserver bias. The tocogram and cardiogram were both studied and details regarding FHR, variability and decelerations were all documented in a tabular form.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2017 categorisation (6):

Category I-Normal: All features reassuring

Category II-Suspicious: 1 non reassuring feature and 2 reassuring feature

Category III-Pathological: 1 abnormal feature or 2 non reassuring features.

In subjects with abnormal traces recorded, umbilical cord blood was collected after birth. Umbilical blood gas concentrations change significantly with time after birth, so collection was done immediately postpartum (7). Blood was collected by aspiration into two separate 2 mL preheparinised syringes carefully to avoid air acculmulation. Syringes were then capped and rolled adequately to ensure proper mixing of blood and heparin, and arterial blood gas analysis performed in the departmental calibrated machine within half an hour of collection. Metabolic acidosis was defined as the measurement in umbilical artery blood of pH value <7.0 and Base Deficit (BD) value in excess of 12 mmol/L (8). The entire procedure has been documented in (Table/Fig 1).

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered into Microsoft Excel datasheet and all analysis was performed using SPSS software version 22.0. Data was represented in the form of frequencies and proportions and Chi-square test was used as a measure of significance. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The study population was normally distributed for various characteristics like age, period of gestation, admission to delivery interval, birth weight etc., as shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Baseline variability was the most common abnormal cardiotocography finding as shown in (Table/Fig 3), whereas decelerations were the most common non reassuring feature. Almost 16 (17.8%) cardiotocography traces had abnormal decelerations, while 24 (26.7%) had abnormal baseline variability. Of the abnormal traces, 51 (56.7%) were NICE category II and the 39 (43.3%) were NICE category III.

(Table/Fig 4) shows the results of cord blood analysis which revealed that 36 (40%) had a pH <7.0, 40 (44.4%) had blood lactate levels in excess of 6 mmol/L and another 43 (47.7%) had a base deficit ≥12 mmol/L. The mean pO2 values were found to be 51.34±15.414 mm of Hg, which of pCO2 was calculated as 53.73±11.722 and of HCO3 as 19.133±2.9925 mmol/L.

(Table/Fig 5) shows that pH value <7.0, base deficit ≥12 mmol/L and lactate ≥6 mmol/L were all found to be statistically significant with p-value <0.05. Umbilical cord blood pCO2 and HCO3 both were found statistically not significant.

(Table/Fig 6) shows that abnormalities of FHR and baseline variability had higher odds of predicting umbilical artery acidemia. The odd’s ratio for FHR abnormality was as high as 2.768 in predicting umbilical artery acidemia.

Discussion

Conventionally, for many years, the diagnosis of intrapartum hypoxia has been based on the clinical signs of foetal distress (like meconium staining of liquor and FHR abnormalities on auscultation) and the assessment of Appearance Pulse Grimace response Activity Respiration (APGAR) scores at birth (9). However, all conventional methods are plagued by poor specificity and predictive values which necessitate the need for better diagnostic tests.

The present study population was normally distributed for age, with 43 (47.8%) patients falling between 21 to 25 years of age. The mean age was calculated as 24.21±3.43 years. A 32.2% of the study population was at full term on admission with the mean gestational age in weeks on admission being 38.567±1.01 weeks. In the study by Aboulghar WM et al., the mean age of included women was 26.94±6.23 years (Range: 17 to 42 years) and the mean gestational age was 38.41±2.65 weeks (Range: 29 to 42.14 weeks) which corroborated well with the present study (10). In the study population, 36 (40%) mothers were second gravida, while only 2 (2.2%) were 5th order or higher pregnancies. As per the study by Aboulghar WM et al., the median parity was 1 (Range: 0-5) (10).

Baseline variability was the most common abnormal cardiotocography finding, whereas decelerations were the most common non reassuring feature. A 70% of the cardiotocography traces had a normal FHR pattern. Almost 18% cardiotocography traces had abnormal decelerations, while 26.66% had abnormal baseline variability. A 56.7% of the traces were categorised as NICE category II traces, while the rest were all documented as category III traces. In the study by Aboulghar WM et al., 52% subjects had suspicious cardiotocography, while 48% had pathological cardiotocography (10). Abnormal variability was the most common pattern. In the study by Ray C and Ray A, 50.2% of the subjects had category I (normal) cardiotocography tracing, 36.5% had category II (indeterminate) cardiotocography tracing and 13.3% had category III (abnormal) intrapartum cardiotocography tracing (4). A 90.7% had normal baseline FHR, 8.0% had bradycardia and 1.3% had tachycardia, 45.8% had abnormal beat-to-beat variability. Jackson M et al., studied the intrapartum FHR characteristics in more than 48,000 patients with a singleton, non anomalous foetus in term labour at 10 hospitals (11). In their study, considering all of labour, FHR pattern was category I in 77.9 percent of the time, category II in 22.1% of the time and category III in 0.004% of the time. In the two hours before delivery, category I tracings were less commonly observed (60.9%) and both category II and category III tracings became more common (39.1% and 0.006%, respectively). They concluded that category I and II FHR patterns are more common in labour than category III.

Cord blood analysis revealed that 40% had a pH <7.0, 44.4% had blood lactate levels in excess of 6 mmol/L and another 47.7% had a base deficit ≥12 mmol/L. The mean pO2 values were found to be 51.34±15.414 mm of Hg, which of pCO2 was calculated as 53.73±11.722 and of HCO3- as 19.133±2.9925 mmol/L. In the study by Aboulghar WM et al., the mean cord blood pH was 7.24±0.07 (range: 7.05-7.39) (10). In the study by Ray C and Ray A mean cord blood pH was 7.253±0.07 (4).

An 18.3% of the neonates had acidosis which is comparable to the studies by Kaban A et al., (13.26%) and Modarressnejad V (20.25%) (12),(13). In the study by Aboulghar WM et al., incidence of acidosis was higher, with 34% of babies having abnormal cord blood pH (10). This higher value of acidosis in the neonates could be explained by the fact that their study included only those women who had undergone C-section for pathological and suspicious cardiotocography, while in the other studies mentioned above and in the present study, consecutive term labouring women were included.

On Odd’s ratio estimation for individual cardiotocography features with respect to umbilical artery acidemia (defined as pH<7.0 and/or BD ≥12 mmol/L as per guidelines), it was found that abnormalities of FHR and baseline variability had higher odds of predicting umbilical artery acidemia. The study by Aboulghar WM et al., performed a binary logistic regression analysis of different features of cardiotocography as predictor of abnormal cord blood pH (<7.2) was performed (10). Baseline bradycardia significantly increased the risk of abnormal cord blood pH almost three-folds {RR 3.2, 95% CI (2.29 to 4.33)}. Reduced beat-to-beat variability significantly increased the risk of abnormal cord blood pH almost two-folds {RR 2.35, 95% CI (1.08 to 5.09)}. Late decelerations significantly increased the risk of abnormal cord blood pH almost seven-folds {RR 7.1, 95% CI (3.86 to 12.3)}.

The strength of the present study was its exclusion of various high-risk pregnancies and their confounding effect on foetal well-being. The idea was to isolate possibility of timely intervention to improve foetal outcomes even in apparently low risk pregnancies those that contribute the most to foetal morbidity in low-middle income countries. These pregnancies, perceived as low risk cases, fall victim to unexplained foetal deterioration in the absence of adequate foetal surveillance.

Limitation(s)

Cardiotocography, in spite of being a good screening tool, is prone to significant intra and interobserver variation. A considerable degree of bias is associated with cardiotocography interpretation. Sample size was small. Sampling of wrong vessels is a common difficulty encountered during blood sampling particularly when the needle crosses the artery to pierce the vein, often leading to mixed sampling. Despite its strengths, the present study has been conducted over a short period and the long term effect of drugs and analgesics on behavioural/neurological/cognitive development seen during the first five years of life, has not been taken into account, some of which may be a sequelae of intrapartum hypoxic stress. These need to be explored further so that existing knowledge may be updated.

Conclusion

Foetal surveillance is slated to become the cornerstone of modern obstetrics. In low-resource settings where facilities for foetal scalp blood sampling is not readily available and where rates of perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity are even higher, cardiotocography may find a suitable place in anticipating adverse outcomes. The findings of the present study may find a place in low and middle income countries where foetal hypoxia in the background of limited resources still remains a challenge to many.

References

1.
Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (cardiotocography) as a form of electronic foetal monitoring (EFM) for foetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:CD006066. [crossref]
2.
Ayres-de-Campos, D. Arulkumaran, S. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum foetal monitoring: Physiology of foetal oxygenation and the main goals of intrapartum foetal monitoring. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics. 2015;131(1):05-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
De Souza MTK, Dobre M, da Silva DMB, Brateanu A, Baltatu OC, Campos LA. Intrapartum foetal heart rate: A possible predictor of neonatal acidemia and Apgar score. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1489. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Ray C, Ray A. Intrapartum cardiotocography and its correlation with umbilical cord blood pH in term pregnancies: A prospective study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2017;6(7):2745-52. [crossref]
5.
Behra S, Agarwal N, Sinha M, Goel J. To study the category ii cardiotocography and its correlation with umbilical cord pH. Int J of Adv Res. 2020;8:1086-91. (ISSN 2320-5407). www.journalijar.com. [crossref]
6.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2017. Intrapartum Care. Nice Guideline CG190 (February 2017). Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190/resources/interpretation-of-cardiotocograph-traces-pdf-248732173.
7.
Armstrong L, Stenson B. Effect of delayed sampling on umbilical cord arterial and venous lactate and blood gases in clamped and unclamped vessels. Arch Dis Child Foetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91(5):F342-45. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 348, November 2006: Umbilical cord blood gas and acid-base analysis. Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;108(5):1319-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Upadhyay M, Duhan N, Chugh K. Umbilical cord blood lactate as an indicator of foetal hypoxia. J Gynecol. 2017;2(S3):S03-06. [crossref]
10.
Aboulghar WM, Ibrahim MA, Allam IS, Hosny W, Otify M. Validity of cardiotocography in the diagnosis of acute foetal hypoxia in low resources settings. The Internet Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2013;17(1):01-08.
11.
Jackson M, Holmgren CM, Esplin MS, Henry E, Varner MW. Frequency of foetal heart rate categories and short term neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(4):803-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Kaban A, Cengiz H, Kaban I, Özcan A, Karakaş S. The success of cardiotocography in predicting perinatal outcome. J Clini Experiment Investigations. 2012;3(2):168-71. [crossref]
13.
Modarressnejad V. Umbilical cord blood pH and risk factors for acidemia in neonates. Eastern Mediterranean Health J. 2005;11(1/2):96-101.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51835.15965

Date of Submission: Aug 09, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 10, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 11, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 13, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 10, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jan 06, 2022 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com