Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 152460

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : February | Volume : 16 | Issue : 2 | Page : ZC07 - ZC12 Full Version

Knowledge, Awareness and Practices of the use of Digital Technology in Dentistry among Postgraduate Students and Dental Practitioners in India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52090.15945
Ramesh Nayakar, Poonam Sardesai, Sayed Killedar, Anandkumar Patil, Mangesh Kakodker

1. Professor and Research Guide, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, KAHER’S KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India. 2. Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, KAHER’S KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India. 3. Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, KAHER’S KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, KAHER’S KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India. 5. Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Goa Dental College and Hospital, Bambolim, Goa, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Poonam Sardesai,
Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge,
KAHER’S KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: pmsardesai@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Currently, digital dentistry is an umbrella topic that predominantly includes the areas of intraoral scanning, Three-dimensional (3D) printing and Computer-aided Designing/ Computer-aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM). It allows the transfer of information between physical and digital data, with the significant advantage of easing the transition process and increasing efficiency. Digital technology is a crucial component of modern dentistry which has a significant influence on our present and future dental practice.

Aim: To assess the knowledge, awareness and practices of the use of digital technology and its implications in dentistry among dental postgraduate students and dental practitioners.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire based online survey was undertaken at KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India between April 2021 and July 2021 amongst dental practitioners and dental postgraduate students of different regions across India. The questionnaire consisted of 21 questions which evaluated their awareness towards digital dentistry, its advantages and shortcomings, their knowledge and practices towards digital dentistry. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test in each group, using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. The p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Of total 270, 261 respondents (96.67%) were aware of CAD/CAM technology in dentistry. A total of 237 respondents (87.78%) felt that the lack of knowledge was one of the shortcomings of CAD/CAM with a p-value=0.039 rather than its high cost (184 respondents 68.15%, p-value=0.009) and there was a need to increase the knowledge and understanding regarding the same. A total of 252 respondents (93.33%) were of the opinion that digital technology is the future of dentistry and it will have a positive impact on our profession and 83.59% respondents felt that digital technology would have a role to play in the current COVID-19 scenario. The teaching faculty (92.86%), showed better understanding about the digital technology compared to private practitioners (66.22%) and postgraduate students (62.59%).

Conclusion: In the given set of participants, most of the participants were aware about digital technology which shows a satisfactory outcome. The teaching faculty showed better understanding about the digital technology compared to private practitioners and postgraduate students. However, to make them acquainted with CAD/CAM, dental education programmes and workshops should be conducted which will create a future generation of dentists who will be well-versed with digital dentistry. With so much room to grow, it will help dentists to work as one and deliver the absolute best care to their patients and create a better tomorrow.

Keywords

Aesthetics, Computer-aided design, Computer-aided manufacturing, Chairside, Dental education, Three-dimensional printing, Workflow

Digital dentistry includes treatments performed by means of digital or computer-controlled components instead of utilising mechanical or electrical equipment (1). The progress of digital technology and the introduction of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) and 3D printing has brought large changes to the traditional manufacturing method, where manual work is carried out after oral impression taking (2).

The high demand for rapid but effective aesthetic dental treatment, as well as the ability to provide same day chairside restorations, is appealing to both patients and dentists (3). The application of CAD/CAM technology has advanced greatly to serve patients and to simplify, as well as standardise the process of manufacturing dental restorations. As a result of this workflow change, clinical technicians, dentists as well as patients are influenced (4),(5). Due to increasing demand for cosmetic and metal-free restorations, a higher strength ceramic has been developed (6) that is only used in association with CAD/CAM technology (7),(8),(9). CAD/CAM was utilised to produce implant abutments and frameworks after crown and bridgework fabrication had gained popularity in the 1990s (10).

Three-dimensional (3D) intraoral imaging data can be used for superimposition with 3D radiographic and facial imaging data. The software assists orthognathic surgery planning, dental implant surgery planning, and orthodontic treatment planning. The use of digital technologies in implant and orthognathic surgery showed the capability to supplant conventional approaches (11),(12).

Western countries have adopted Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) into their routine dental practises, while in India only a limited fraction of dentists use CAD/CAM in their regular workflow. The awareness of CAD/CAM is minimal amongst the dentists in India, and even amongst the dentists who are aware, only a fraction of them use it in their practice (13). Considering the above advantages and its vast applications in all fields of dentistry, it is of utmost importance to have a thorough knowledge regarding the use of CAD/CAM and to know its shortcomings and the slow adaption of digital technology.

The use of digital technology has become an essential part of modern dentistry. It is speculated that this will change the shape of future dental practice (14). There have been surveys done to assess the knowledge and attitude of undergraduate students in India towards the use of CAD/CAM (13) and to know the infiltration of CAD/CAM technology in the workflow among United Kingdom and Saudi Arabian dentists (3),(15). However, the research to investigate the current place of digital dentistry among dental practitioners in India is scarce (3). Hence, this study was undertaken with an intent to assess and understand the knowledge, awareness and practices regarding use of digital technology among postgraduate students and dental practitioners.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted at KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India, between April 2021 to July 2021 which focussed on dental practitioners and postgraduate students from across India. The Institutional Ethical Committee approval was obtained (Certificate no. 1437 dated 29/04/2021).

Sample size calculation: Sample size was estimated using the formula N=4×PQ/D2

Where, N is sample size, ‘P’ stands for highest prevalence which was 80 for pilot study, Q=100-P and ‘D’ stands for acceptable error or lowest prevalence of 5%. Therefore, the sample size calculated was 256. The study included a total of 270 respondents.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The study included postgraduate students, teaching faculties from different dental institutions and private practitioners. Along with the questionnaire, informed consent was obtained from these participants via Google forms. Participants who refused consent to participate in the study were excluded. The undergraduate students and interns were also excluded from the study.

The pilot testing of the questionnaire included 87 respondents which comprised of postgraduates, teaching faculty and private practitioners.The study results revealed 74 (80%) of the total respondents were aware about the use of digital dentistry. But their understanding about the applications of digital dentistry in routine dental practice was found to be less (48%).

Questionnaire

The custom questionnaire was designed, comprising of 21 questions in which 19 were closed ended and 2 open ended questions. The questionnaire was divided into three parts which included the demographic details (Q no.1-5) , knowledge based questions (Q no. 6-10), awareness (Q no. 11-14), practices (Q no. 15-21).

The questionnaire was validated for relevance of questions particular to the topic of the survey (Face validity) and for the reliability of the options provided (Content validity) with a Content Validity Index score (CVIs) of 0.60 by the faculty from the Department of Prosthodontics, KAHER VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka along with subject expert.

Based on the pilot study the reliability and internal consistency of the questionnaire revealed that the survey was reliable with the Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency score of 0.8. Each question had to be answered by the participants.

The data was gathered by sending the link of the online form via emails and WhatsApp to all the study participants. The study participants were having sufficient time of two weeks to complete the online questionnaire. If any issue surfaced while filling out the questionnaire form, the investigator resolved it immediately during the study duration. The resultant data was tabulated and subjected to statistical analysis to draw the conclusion from the resultant study.

Statistical Analysis

The individual responses obtained from all participants were collated on MS Excel sheet. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software version 20.0 and Chi-square test was utilised to check if there was any significant association between the questionnaire items and the type of practitioner with a significance level of p-value <0.05.

Results

A total of 270 participants filled the questionnaire out of which 147 respondents (54.44%) were postgraduate students, 74 (27.41%) were private practitioners, 28 (10.37%) were teaching faculty, 21 (7.78%) were both; teaching faculty as well as private practitioners (Table/Fig 1).

When asked for which procedure is digital technology is useful in dentistry, most of the respondents (86.67%) said that it was crown and bridge fabrication and 85.56% respondents said it was implant restorations. Some also gave suggestions that it is useful in cephalometrics, 3D model preparation and making provisional restorations for fixed partial dentures, endodontics. One also opined that it is useful in incorporating prescription in brackets and indirect bonding in Orthodontics (Table/Fig 2).

(Table/Fig 3) shows the participants’ responses for use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Coming to the advantages and shortcomings of CAD/CAM, 230 respondents (85.19%) were of the opinion that CAD/CAM fabricated restorations were more precise as compared to those fabricated by conventional methods. Digital dataflow was also one of the major advantages which was agreed on by 68.15% respondents and the values were statistically highly significant (p-value=0.006) (Table/Fig 4). Respondents also mentioned that with the help of CAD/CAM there would be better shade matching, data can be saved and used for further purpose and future prosthetic rehabilitation.

Immediate data transfer and retrievability of the scan data at any point of time was considered as a major advantage of CAD/CAM in the clinical scenario with a response rate of 87.78% with p-value=0.039 while 78.89% felt that accurate and precise fit of restoration/orthodontic appliance was major advantage (Table/Fig 5).

Lack of knowledge was considered as a major shortcoming of CAD/CAM when compared among two groups (p-value=0.039) (Table/Fig 6).

Among the study participants, 96.67% were aware of the use of CAD/CAM in dentistry while 3.33% were unaware of the same with a p-value=0.202 (Table/Fig 7). Awareness regarding the use of digital technology in dentistry shown in (Table/Fig 8).

A 22.22% were unaware of any CAD/CAM system while majority of the respondents 67.41% had knowledge regarding Chairside Economical Restoration of Esthetic Ceramic (CEREC) system and were aware about it (Table/Fig 9).

Strengthened ceramics like E.Max was regularly used with CAD/CAM according to 39.26% respondents while composite was rarely used. Some also suggested that prefabricated acrylic blocks could also be used with this technology (Table/Fig 10).

Considering the current COVID-19 scenario, when we asked whether digital dentistry would have a role to play for which 83.59% replied positively while 13.70% were not sure [Table /Fig-11].

A 67.04% of the respondents did not attend any training programmes or workshops on CAD/CAM (Table/Fig 11) and a major portion was made up by postgraduate students.

Discussion

Digital dentistry using intraoral scanners, CAD/CAM and 3D printing has gained popularity in the last few decades (5). Hence, it is important for us as dentists to go along with the trend and have a better understanding and knowledge about the same.

A 70% of patients who received new digital complete dentures claimed their new dentures were “better” than their earlier set of complete dentures, according to a survey done by Saponaro PC et al., (16).

The main importance of knowing about digital technology is its significant advantages which are patient compliance, quick and aesthetic results. Information sharing is nearly effortless which makes it far easier for the dentist to show their work, share their learning experiences and ask for suggestions on cases (17). According to present study, 87.78% (237 respondents) were of the opinion that immediate data transfer and retrievability of scan data at any point was one of the major advantages of CAD/CAM in the clinical scenario followed by ease in laboratory authorisation and communication. This was a contradicting to a survey carried out by Udhayaraja P et al., where time efficiency (48%) and precise fit (20%) was considered a major advantage (13).

Also, in the current COVID-19 scenario, we asked if digital technology would have a role to play where 223 (83.59%) respondents replied positively, it provides a benefit of infection control, reduced appointment duration and decreased chances of cross contamination.

Digital impressions with intraoral scanners present with an advantage of 3D previsualisation of the preparation and reducing the risk of distortion and material usage during impression making (18). It also prevents the problems like gagging that are associated with conventional impression making. It is shown to provide superior accuracy as there are no errors associated with contraction or expansion of impression and model materials which was agreed on by the respondents (18).

The CAD/CAM generates visualisations during the course of design process which helps in decision making. Advances in diagnostic capabilities affect the quality of care thereby, providing new solutions to conventional dental problems which was also highlighted in the current study (19).

Considering its significant advantages, there is a slow adaptation of digital technology among Indian dentists, (20) when asked about its shortcomings, 87.78% (237 respondents) agreed that lack of knowledge was one of the main factors rather than high cost which was agreed on by 68.15% (184) respondents. These findings were contradictory to the survey performed by Udhayaraja P et al., where high cost was considered a major factor (13). This study also revealed that some respondents preferred conventional methods over CAD/CAM which was similar to a survey done among United Kingdom(UK) dentists who felt the lack of perceived advantages over conventional production methods (15).

A survey conducted by Palanisamy S and Hegde C, on the knowledge of CAD/CAM among undergraduate students of an Institute in Karnataka showed that they have only shallow knowledge of the same (21). About 74% of students were not aware about the materials that can be used to fabricate prosthesis using CAD/CAM technology which was in agreement with the survey done by Kavarthapu A and Suresh V (20). Hence, it is important to increase the clinical knowledge of the same from the early years of dentistry.

When asked about awareness regarding various CAD/CAM systems some were unaware of any CAD/CAM systems and was highlighted more by private practitioners and postgraduate students.

Total of 67.04% of the respondents did not attend any training programmes or workshops on CAD/CAM and a major portion was made up by postgraduate students, thereby 98.89% of the respondents (267) felt there was a need to increase teaching in the undergraduate and postgraduate courses. This was in accordance with a survey conducted by Tran D et al., which concluded that Continuing Dental Education (CDE) and Continuing Professional Development (CPD) courses do not go hand in hand and to bridge this gap, universities should conduct evidence-based teaching of CAD/CAM technology in these courses(15).

As it was observed in this study, the major study population were postgraduate students who are the future of dental practice. Hence, it is required to have elborative curricular reforms pertaining to the digital dentistry in the curriculum and encourage these students and practitioners to attend CDE, extensive hands on programmes in the field of digital dentistry which was also suggested through a survey conducted by Pandey S et al., in which he put forth that CDE programs should be conducted for dentists to increase their awareness and to gain more knowledge about the use of digital dentistry procedures (22).

Almost all respondents highlighted the fact that digital dentistry would have a positive impact on our profession which was in accordance with a survey conducted by Tran D et al., among UK dentists.Their survey showed that 89% respondents felt that CAD/CAM will have a significant role to play in the future of dentistry (15). Hence, we should work towards gaining more knowledge and create a future generation of dentists who will be well-versed with digital dentistry.

Limitation(s)

The smaller sample size among the different type of practitioners was the main limitation of the present study and for better understanding about the perception of knowledge and awareness about digital dentistry and its implications on dental practice a large number of participants can be included from different part of the country.

Conclusion

The current practice of dentistry should have specific focus towards application of digitisation in the workflow to meet high standard patient needs. The education on CAD/CAM and their application is essential for postgraduate students and dental practioners. In order to create a shift in digital dentistry and to enhance knowledge and awareness among dentists, we should conduct dental education programs, workshops or hands on courses. This will will be a new era in dentistry providing modern solutions to traditional problems which will be beneficial for both the patients along with the dentists.

References

1.
Gupta C, Mittal A. Role of digital technology in prosthodontics: A step toward improving dental care. Indian J Oral Health Res. 2018;4(2):35-41. [crossref]
2.
Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: Deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140:1301-04. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Nassani MZ, Ibraheem S, Shamsy E, Darwish M, Faden A, Kujan O. A survey of dentists’ perception of chair-side CAD/CAM technology. Healthcare (Basel). 2021:9(1):68. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: Current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28:44-56. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55:559-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:557-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital Dentistry: An overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008;204:505-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Kapos T, Evans C. CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:117-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Miyazaki T, Nakamura T, Matsumura H, Ban S, Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res. 2013;57:236-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Priest G. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:22-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29:25-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Van den Bempt M, Liebregts J, Maal T, Bergé S, Xi T. Toward a higher accuracy in orthognathic surgery by using intraoperative computer navigation, 3D surgical guides, and/or customized osteosynthesis plates: A systematic review. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(12):2108-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Udhayaraja P, Ariga P, Jain AR. Awareness on computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing and its applications among general dental practitioners: A knowledge,attitude, and practice survey. Drug Invent Today. 2018;10(6):1012-15.
14.
Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: State of the art. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58:208-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Tran D, Nesbit M, Petridis H. Survey of UK dentists regarding the use of CAD/CAM technology. Br Dent J. 2016;221(10):639-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Saponaro PC, Yilmaz B, Johnston W, Heshmati RH, McGlumphy EA. Evaluation of patient experience and satisfaction with CAD-CAM-fabricated complete dentures: A retrospective survey study. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(4):524-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Mensudar R , Venkatesh A , Mary G , Pravalikka P. Digital dentistry- the future. Int J Med Prof Res. 2017;4(2):49-53.
18.
Chandran S, Jaini JL, Serene BA, Mathew A, Keepanasseril A. Digital versus conventional impressions in dentistry: A systematic review. J Clin Diag Res. 2019;13(4):ZE01-ZE06. [crossref]
19.
Pasricha N. Digital dentistry: The future. Indian J Oral Sci. 2016;7(1):01-02. [crossref]
20.
Kavarthapu A, Suresh V. CAD/CAM: A perspective of dental undergraduate. IOSR J Dental Med Sci. 2014;13(1):30-33. [crossref]
21.
Palanisamy S, Hegde C. Awareness among dental undergraduate students regarding CAD/CAM technology-A survey report. J Health Allied Sci. 2019;(9):57-63. [crossref]
22.
Pandey S, Sowmya K, Pradeep S. Assessment of knowledge, attitude, practice based survey on digital dentistry among dental practitioners. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2020;7(1):2055-67.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52090.15945

Date of Submission: Aug 24, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 03, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 16, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 25, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 13, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jan 12, 2022 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com