Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 204410

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : April | Volume : 16 | Issue : 4 | Page : LC42 - LC46 Full Version

Forgotten Needs of Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Qualitative Study in Iran


Published: April 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52712.16276
Mansour Dianati, Mohsen Taghadosi, Batol Zamani, Fereshteh Mazhariazad

1. Assistant Professor, Department of School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran. 2. Associate Professor, Department of School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran. 3. Associate Professor, Autoimmune Diseases Research Centre of Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran. 4. PhD Scholar, Department of School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.

Correspondence Address :
Fereshteh Mazhariazad,
PhD Scholar, Department of School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kashan University of
Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
E-mail: Fmazharyazad@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease which affects different body systems and different aspects of health. It has an irreversible course. Identifying the needs of SLE afflicted patients is the first step to help them manage and cope with their illness. Qualitative research among patients with SLE can identify aspects of the disease relevant to clinical research and practice.

Aim: To explore the forgotten needs of patients with SLE.

Materials and Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in Iran from April 2020 to March 2021 using conventional content analysis. All participants were patients with definite diagnosis of SLE purposefully selected from Iranian Lupus Association and Rheumatology Clinics in Kashan, Kerman and Bandarabbas, Iran. Data were collected with deep, semi-structured, and face-to-face interviews, which are focused on patients’ experiences of needs. Data collection continued until saturation was reached. Finally, 17 patients with SLE participated in this study. Data collection and data analysis were conducted concurrently. Data were analysed with conventional content analysis, and managed with the MAXQDA software 2020.

Results: The forgotten needs of patients with SLE came into three main categories, namely social needs (with three subcategories), economic needs (with two subcategories), and need for self-control (with two subcategories). The seven subcategories of these three categories were the need for family support, the need for professional support by healthcare providers, the need for social support, the need for financial support by family members, the need for financial support by the government, the need for gaining autonomy, and the need for effective role performance.

Conclusion: Patients with SLE have many forgotten psychological and socio-economic needs. Patient education, referrals to mental health professionals, and support organisations are important supplements to medical treatment. The findings can be used to develop strategies for providing quality care to patients with SLE and other chronic disabling conditions.

Keywords

Autoimmune, Autonomy, Disease burdens, Healthcare, Qualitative research, Socio-economic status, Support

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a complex chronic disease which affects multiple body systems in several months to several years (1). The SLE causes damages to body tissues and has courses of relapse and remission (2). The prevalence of SLE widely varies in different countries and is 30-50 cases per 1,00,000 people in Asian countries (3), (4) and 20-150 cases per 1,00,000 people in the United States (5), (6). According to a report by the Rheumatology Research Center of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, the prevalence of SLE in Iran is forty cases per 1,00,000 people. In other words, one out of each 2500 Iranians suffers from SLE (7). SLE affects different racial and ethnic groups though its prevalence in some groups is greater. For instance, SLE affects the black race 2-5 times more than the white race (8), (9). Similarly, SLE differently affects different age and gender groups. For instance, a study in Iran showed that the ratio of women with SLE to afflicted men was 8.8:1 and the age of SLE onset was 24.2 years (1). A study in the United Kingdom also showed that the ratio of SLE-afflicted women and men was 15:1 in adults and 5:1 in children (10). The SLE symptoms and manifestations are usually unpredictable (11). The clinical manifestations of SLE appear in most body systems, including musculoskeletal (prevalence: 85.2%), integumentary (prevalence: 83.1%), circulatory (prevalence: 67.1%), renal (prevalence: 66.6%), nervous (prevalence: 24%), respiratory (prevalence: 22.3%), and cardiac (17.5%) (7). Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms of SLE which negatively affects the ability to perform daily activities (8) and the ability to perform personal roles as mother, spouse, friend, and colleague and thereby, leads to marital and familial problems (12).

Long-term affliction by SLE, particularly its dermatologic manifestations, can cause a wide range of mental problems. For instance, it threatens identity, changes roles, responsibilities, and lifestyle (13),(14), alters body image (13),(15), reduces self-confidence, and causes ineffective role performance, despair, and frustration (15). The SLE in women also causes fears and concerns over getting pregnant, medication side effects for the neonate, and affliction of the neonate by the disease, and thereby results in depression and social isolation (16). In younger women, SLE-associated skin rashes and lesions, hair loss, weight gain, hormonal disturbances, pain, fatigue, depression, anxiety, altered body image, low self-confidence, and emotional problems can cause sexual dysfunction (17). Studies reported that SLE may cause employment loss in young ages (15),(18) and thereby can impose heavy financial burden on patients and their families (19),(20).

Because of the different physical, mental, and socio-economic problems of SLE, afflicted patients have a wide range of needs (21). Although studies on unmet needs of patients with SLE have been conducted in different countries (22),(23), studies conducted in Iran on this issue are limited. However, there are limited in-depth data about their needs. Therefore, the present study was conducted to narrow this gap. The aim of the study was to explore the forgotten needs of patients with SLE.

Material and Methods

This qualitative study was conducted in Iran from April 2020 to March 2021 using conventional content analysis approach.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran (code: IR.KAUMS.REC.1399.006). Participants were informed about the study aim and their freedom to voluntarily participate in and unilaterally withdraw from the study. All participants provided written informed consent for participation.

Study Procedure

Study participants were patients with definite diagnosis of SLE purposefully selected from the Iranian Lupus Association (ILA) in Tehran, and rheumatology clinics in Kashan, Kerman and Bandarabbas, and the medical records of patients referred to ILA and Rheumatology Clinics were scanned. Eligibility criteria were definite ability to share experiences, and willingness to participate in the study. Then, they were contacted on telephone, the aim of the study was explained to them, and they were invited to the study. An appointment for data collection was made with each eligible patient. A total of 17 patients with SLE took part in this study.

Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were held for data collection. The corresponding author of the study conducted all interviews at participants in Persian, preferred place and time and using an interview guide. Examples of the main interview questions were:

• “Can you explain your experiences of SLE?”
• “What new needs have been created for you since affliction by SLE and what measures have you taken in response to your new SLE-related needs and problems?”

Based on participants’ responses to these questions, clarifying questions were used. Examples of these questions were

• “What does this mean and can you explain more?”

The phone numbers of participants were taken for any possible
follow-up interview, though only one participant was interviewed twice. The length of the interviews was 45-60 minutes. All interviews were held in a private room and were audio-recorded with participants’ permission. Study data were saturated with 18 interviews with 17 participants. when no new conceptual codes were acquired from the interviews and all of the categories extracted from the data were adequately developed (24).

Accordingly, each interview was immediately transcribed word by word in the Microsoft Office word and its transcript was frequently read for immersion in the data. Then, words and sentences related to the study aim were determined and coded. The generated codes were grouped into subcategories according to their similarities.

Then, the transcript was read and reviewed for several times and meaning units were identified and coded based on the study aim. The codes were categorised into subcategories according to their conceptual similarities. Subcategories were also compared and categorised into main categories and main themes.The MAXQDA software 2020 was used for the data management.

Credibility was ensured through sampling with maximum variation from four cities of Iran (Tehran, Kashan, Kerman and Bandarabbas), respecting participants’ experiences, data collection through in-depth semi-structured interviews, providing clear descriptions about data analysis, providing quotations from participants’ experiences, exclusion of irrelevant data, close relationship with participants, prolonged engagement with the study, immersion in the data, member checking, and peer checking (25).

For member checking, 10 interviews together with their corresponding codes were provided to participants through the WhatsApp Messenger to check the congruence between our findings and their own experiences. For peer checking, two qualitative researchers external to the study assessed and approved the accuracy of the data analysis.

To ensure dependability, identical questions were used in all interviews, all interviews were recorded and transcribed word by word, the steps of the study were documented with details, and participant’s experiences were cited in the final report of the study One strategy to ensure confirmability was to document all research-related activities over time so that outsiders can track the activities through the documentations (25). Therefore, authors attempted to carefully document all steps of the study and all research-related decisions in order to provide others with the opportunity of tracking our activities during the study. Transferability of the findings was also ensured 43through providing detailed descriptions about the study context, participants, sampling method, and data collection method.

Statistical Analysis

The conventional content analysis was used for the data analysis and the data was managed using MAQDA software 2020.

Results

Total 17 patients with SLE participated in the present study. Their age was in the range of 18-59 years and the mean of their SLE duration was 6.83 years. (Table/Fig 1) shows participan’s characteristics.

Data analysis revealed three main categories and seven subcategories for the forgotten socio-economic needs of patients with SLE. These three categories were social needs, economic needs, and need for self-control (Table/Fig 2).

Social Needs

The participants felt that the necessity to spend a large amount of time on SLE treatment and care reduces their time to engage in social activities, changes their social relationships, causes them employment-related problems, and reduces their ability to afford household expenses. These problems create the need for support. The subcategories of this main category were the need for family support, the need for professional support by healthcare providers, and the need for social support.

1.1. The need for family support: Participants’ experiences showed their need for family support. Most participants highlighted the key role of their families in providing them with physical, emotional, and informational support throughout the course of SLE. Most of them reported that they needed unconditional kindness and support and believed that receiving kindness from family members gave them sense of well-being, helped them better cope with their suffering and disabilities, and thereby, reduced the risk of depression.

“I thank my husband very much because if he hadn’t supported me, I might not have been able to cope with my illness. He has always been with me during difficulties, problems, and hospital stay” (P. 9).

Participants highly valued family members’ understanding of their conditions and noted that such understanding gave them hope for the future, enhanced their motivation for life, and promoted their self-confidence for self-care.

“My husband has always been with me and has made me happy and helped me keep my family happy and make more attempt to rear my children” (P. 10).

Participants with a nurse in their families had higher level of satisfaction and noted that family members’ greater knowledge about SLE helped them feel assured and peace of mind because with the help of knowledgeable family members, they could instantly find answer to their questions and thereby, manage their concerns and less frequently experience fear and anxiety.

“As my sister is a nurse, she knows the normal ranges of laboratory tests and told me that the results of my tests were in the normal range and my disease was under control” (P. 14).

As SLE has debilitating symptoms and manifestations during its relapses, afflicted patients cannot have an independent life and cannot independently fulfill their self-care needs. Therefore, family members have key roles in caregiving to them. All participants highlighted the importance of receiving care from their families and considered their spouses’ and mothers’ support very helpful.

“I can’t do anything at home and my mother and sister do all my tasks. Sometimes, I even can’t do my self-care activities such as bathing. My sister helps me in these occasions” (P. 2).

1.2. The need for professional support by healthcare providers: The SLE is a chronic illness and hence, afflicted patients frequently visit healthcare providers, particularly physicians and nurses. Therefore, healthcare providers’ professional support helps them ful fill their needs and more effectively cope with their conditions. The different types of professional support by healthcare providers include emotional support, informational support, and establishment of accurate diagnosis. Participants considered healthcare providers’ empathy and emotional support as significant factors contributing to their senses of satisfaction and well-being and believed that healthcare providers’ good relationships with them helped them better accept and cope with their conditions, reduced their stress, and boosted their morale and hope.

“During a medical visit, I told the doctor that I had many problems and asked him just to listen to my words and not prescribe anything. He sat and listened to me when I told him about my back pain and all of my problems” (P. 10).

As SLE is a chronic illness with a wide range of problems and complications, afflicted patients need information about their conditions and self-care. Therefore, participants reported the need for informational support by healthcare providers and highlighted that healthcare providers’ educations and informational support were crucial for promoting their coping with their illness, reducing their uncertainties, and enhancing their adherence to their treatments and self-care activities.

“A good doctor and his/her ability to establish accurate diagnosis have many positive effects. My doctor is very good and compassionate. He spends time for me and provides me with explanations about my medications” (P. 4).

1.3. The need for social support: Like all human beings, patients with SLE have the need for establishing social relationships and interactions. Social interactions helped participants verbalise their concerns and others’ empathy with them reduced their sense of isolation and gave them good feelings.

“At my workplace, I attempted to tell my colleagues about my disease. Now they know my disease and help me. I also attempt not to burden them with my own responsibilities” (P. 8).

Economic Needs

Participants reported that they had great economic needs, suffered great financial strain, and carried heavy financial burden. This main category had two subcategories which are explained in what follows.

2.1. The need for financial support by family members: Financial strains considerably affect patients with SLE and their ability to receive treatment and care. Those participants who could not afford the costs of treatment and care reported problems in receiving treatments and performing self-care activities.

“I should go to doctor and undergo laboratory tests every two months. Each medical visit costs me 5,00,000 Rials and the costs of laboratory tests are considerable. My husband is a worker with low income. A charity has so far paid the costs of my medications” (P. 4).

In this study, most patients with SLE were females and housewives and usually had neither income nor insurance, they had problems in meeting the costs of treatments, medications, and medical visits. Therefore, they might experience mental problems in addition to their physical problems if their husbands or families could not provide them with adequate financial support.

“It is for 2.5 years that I haven’t referred to my doctor because the costs of medical visits are very high. I go to the pharmacy and buy my medications without medical prescription. My financial status is not very good and I have no insurance” (P. 5).

As SLE is a debilitating condition with early disability, it causes financial problems for afflicted patients through affecting their employment, ability to work, and income.

“I’m a hairdresser. But I can’t work anymore due to joint pain. I get tired very easily and have no energy for work. Therefore, I closed my beauty salon and all my expenses are with my husband” (P. 12).

2.2. The need for financial support by the government: Participants reported that healthcare costs were very high and the government did not adequately provide them with financial support and insurance.

“I’ve been hospitalised three times so far. The costs of hospitalisation are very high. My father is an employee in the Department of Education and suffers from multiple sclerosis which costs him a lot” (P. 11).

The Need for Self-control

Participants reported the need for effective self-control in order to effectively cope with their conditions. The two subcategories of this category were the need for gaining autonomy and the need for effective role performance.

3.1. The need for gaining autonomy: Participants reported that they needed to regain their autonomy. Therefore, they attempted to independently perform their activities and less frequently ask help from their family members because self-confidence and self-reliance gave them a sense of well-being. Moreover, autonomy in performing activities improved their self-confidence and boosted their morale for self-care.

“[When I could independently perform my activities,] I felt highly satisfied with life. I did not have such feeling before. I really could manage at least my own life” (P. 10).

3.2. The need for effective role performance: Along with attempting to gain autonomy, our participants reported that they attempted to effectively perform their familial and social roles. They noted that effective role performance gave them senses of pleasure and satisfaction and helped them manage their SLE related tensions.

“As I’m an energetic person, I never allow this disease to easily affect my life. For example, if I feel I can’t walk, I attempt to stand up and cook food and clean the house. I perform all my tasks under any condition” (P.13).

Discussion

This study revealed that patients with SLE have different forgotten needs which were categorised into three main categories, namely social needs, economic needs, and need for self-control. One of the most important forgotten needs of these patients was social needs which included the need for family support, the need for professional support by healthcare providers, and the need for social support.

Social support is considered as a factor with significant effects on disease course, disease-associated complications, and role performance. It enables patients and their families to effectively select and use social and healthcare resources (26). Patients with SLE may have low income and hence, may be greatly dependent on their family members (27). Their inability to actively participate in social activities also negatively affects their social relationships with friends and relatives and may even cause other people misconceptions about SLE (28). A study reported that other’s poor understanding of SLE, particularly family members, together with the unpredictable course of the disease were associated with frustration and social isolation for afflicted patients (27). Another study reported the unkind behaviours of family members and other people towards patients with SLE (29). Similarly, a study found that patients with SLE considered themselves as heavy burden to their families and friends and reported that they needed their familie’s and friend’s physical help and emotional support (11). Patients with SLE also need strong professional support from healthcare providers. Such support fulfils their needs, provides them with respect and sense of confidence, enhances their engagement in clinical decision making, and improves their capacity for effective coping with SLE (11),(30). Nonetheless, a study showed that healthcare providers mainly focus on the management of SLE-related symptoms and mostly neglect the psychosocial effects of the disease on patients (31).

The participants of this study, also reported that they had some forgotten economic needs. Financial strains associated with SLE and its treatments as well as disability and loss of employment make afflicted patients dependent on others and reduce their ability to fulfill their own healthcare needs. Some studies reported Economic burden was greater for patients with moderate to severe SLE. Patients with SLE had greater health care resource and costs (19),(32) The indirect costs of SLE which are related to the loss of employment and income are usually greater than its direct costs. Loss of employment and its associated costs reduce patient’s self-confidence, restrict their interpersonal relationships, reduce their ability to receive support from friends, limit their access to insurance services, and result in disability (26),(33).

It was also found that participants had a forgotten need for financial support by the government. A study reported that compared with other patients with chronic conditions, patients with SLE usually receive less benefit for disability because their medical records do not accurately reflect their functional limitations (34). Therefore, healthcare managers need to develop strategies to provide strong financial support to patients with SLE, particularly those who have low income and inadequate support.

It was also found that patients with SLE had the need for self-control and autonomy. SLE severely affects self-esteem and autonomy, limits physical and social functioning, and causes anxiety over their future (11). Therefore, psychoeducational interventions are needed to promote patient’s self-confidence and self-efficacy for stress management (35). The current study finding also showed the great need of patients with SLE for effective role performance in family and society. The SLE is associated with physical disability due to neurological and musculoskeletal disorders (11). The severity of physical disability has significant direct relationship with the severity of SLE and its complications. In other words, patients with severer SLE suffer from severer physical disability (36). Fatigue also is a common manifestation of SLE which can result in physical disability. Therefore, these patients need quality educations about effective time and energy management in order to more effectively use their energy, particularly for their occupational activities (8).

Limitation(s)

Qualitative research is influenced by the researcher’s thoughts, ideas and mentality due to its nature. The researcher tried to control this by bracketing.

Conclusion

This study concluded that patients with SLE have many forgotten psychological and socio-economic needs including the needs for family, professional, and social support, the need for financial support, and the need for self-control, autonomy, and effective role performance. These findings can be used to develop strategies for providing quality care to patients with SLE and other debilitating chronic conditions. Each patient with SLE should be considered as a unique patient with unique needs. As most patients with SLE are young women, interventions are needed to effectively fulfill their socio-economic needs.

Acknowledgement

This study is a part of a nursing doctoral dissertation and a research project approved by Kashan University of Medical Sciences. The authors appreciate all the authorities in Kashan University of Medical Sciences who supported this research. The authors also thank all the participants in this study.

Author contributions: M.D and M.T supervised all of the stages of the data collection and data analysis, and provided critical points during the manuscript preparation. B.Z validation and Supervision. F.M.A performed the study conception, data collection and analysis, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript.

References

1.
Gergianaki I, Bertsias G. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Primary Care: An update and practical messages for the General Practitioner. Frontiers in medicine. 2018;5:01-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Stockl A. Complex syndromes, ambivalent diagnosis, and existential uncertainty: The case of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(7):1549-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Osio-Salido E, Manapat-Reyes H. Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus in Asia. Lupus. 2010;19(12):1365-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Jakes RW, Bae SC, Louthrenoo W, Mok CC, Navarra SV, Kwon N. Systematic review of the epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus in the Asia-Pacific region: Prevalence, incidence, clinical features, and mortality. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(2):159-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Izmirly PM, Parton H, Wang L, McCune WJ, Lim SS, Drenkard C, et al. Prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in the united states: Estimates from a meta-analysis of the centers for disease control and prevention national lupus registries. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(6):991-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Stojan G, Petri M. Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: An update. Current opinion in rheumatology. 2018;30(2):144-150. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Akbarian M, Faezi ST, Gharibdoost F, Shahram F, Nadji A, Jamshidi AR, et al. The epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus in Iran: A survey on 2143 cases. Tehran University Medical Journal. 2010;68(5):300-05.
8.
Le Berre M, Maimon G, Sourial N, Guériton M, Vedel I. Impact of transitional care services for chronically ill older patients: A systematic evidence review. AGS. 2017;65(7):1597-608. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Yu DS, Lee DT, Stewart S, Thompson DR, Choi KC, Yu CM. Effect of nurse-implemented transitional care for Chinese individuals with chronic heart failure in Hong Kong: A randomized controlled trial. AGS. 2015;63(8):1583-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Rees F, Doherty M, Grainge M, Davenport G, Lanyon P, Zhang W. The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in the UK, 1999-2012. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(1):136-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Sutanto B, Singh-Grewal D, McNeil HP, O’Neill S, Craig JC, Jones J, et al. Experiences and perspectives of adults living with systemic lupus erythematosus: Thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65(11):1752-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Bultink IE, Turkstra F, Dijkmans BA, Voskuyl AE. High prevalence of unemployment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Association with organ damage and health-related quality of life. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(6):1053-57.
13.
Figueiredo-Braga M, Cornaby C, Cortez A, Bernardes M, Terroso G, Figueiredo M, et al. Depression and anxiety in systemic lupus erythematosus: The crosstalk between immunological, clinical, and psychosocial factors. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(28):e11376. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Shakeri H, Arman F, Hossieni M, Omrani HR, Vahdani A, Shakeri J. Depression, anxiety and disease-related variables and quality of life among individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus living in Kermanshah Province, Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(12):e31047. [crossref]
15.
Trupin L, Tonner MC, Yazdany J, Julian LJ, Criswell LA, Katz PP, et al. The role of neighborhood and individual socioeconomic status in outcomes of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(9):1782-08.
16.
Monahan R, Beaart-van de Voorde L, Steup-Beekman G, Magro-Checa C, Huizinga T, Hoekman J, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms in systemic lupus erythematosus: Impact on quality of life. Lupus. 2017;26(12):1252-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Amini L, Heidari M, Haghighi A, Rahimi Kian F. Sexual function in women with systemic lupus erythematous. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2015;24(121):309-16.
18.
Hodkinson B, Musenge E, Ally M, Meyer PWA, Anderson R, Tikly M. Functional disability and health-related quality of life in South Africans with early rheumatoid arthritis. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. 2012;41(5):366-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Garris C, Shah M, Farrelly E. The prevalence and burden of systemic lupus erythematosus in a medicare population: Retrospective analysis of medicare claims. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation. 2015;13(1):02-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Garris C, Jhingran P, Bass D, Engel-Nitz NM, Riedel A, Dennis G. Healthcare utilization and cost of systemic lupus erythematosus in a US managed care health plan. Journal of medical economics. 2013;16(5):667-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Nayfield S, Ganz P, Moinpour C, Cella D, Hailey B. Report from a National Cancer Institute (USA) workshop on quality of life assessment in cancer clinical trials. Quality of Life Research. 1992;1(3):203-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Zirkzee E, Ndosi M, Vlieland TV, Meesters JJ. Measuring educational needs among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (D-ENAT). Lupus. 2014;23(13):1370-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
McElhone K, Abbott J, Gray J, Williams A, Teh L. Patient perspective of systemic lupus erythematosus in relation to health-related quality of life concepts: A qualitative study. Lupus. 2010;19(14):1640-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Mack N. Qualitative research methods: A data collector’s field guide. Family Health International; 2005.
25.
Polit D, Beck C. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice; 2008. 10th. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins Co; 2017.
26.
Pons-Estel GJ, Alarcón GS, Scofield L, Reinlib L, Cooper GS. Understanding the epidemiology and progression of systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Arthritis Rheum: Elsevier; 2010. p. 257-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Phuti A, Schneider M, Makan K, Tikly M, Hodkinson B. Living with systemic lupus erythematosus in South Africa: A bitter pill to swallow. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2019;17(65):02-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Zhang L, Fu T, Yin R, Zhang Q, Shen B. Prevalence of depression and anxiety in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC psychiatry. 2017;17(1):70. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Yee CS, McElhone K, Teh LS, Gordon C. Assessment of disease activity and quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus-New aspects. Best practice & research clinical rheumatology. 2009;23(4):457-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Waldron N, Brown S, Hewlett S, Elliott B, McHugh N, McCabe C. ‘It’s more scary not to know’: A qualitative study exploring the information needs of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus at the time of diagnosis. Musculoskeletal Care. 2011;9(4):228-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Hale E, Treharne G, Lyons A, Norton Y, Mole S, Mitton D, et al. “Joining the dots” for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Personal perspectives of health care from a qualitative study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(5):585-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Hammond E, Freidel H, Garal-Pantaler E, Pignot M, Velthuis E, Wang X, et al. PS8: 160 Health care resource use (hru) and medical cost analyses as a function of systemic lupus erythematosus (sle) disease severity: Analysis of claims data of a german sickness fund. Archives of Disease in childhood; 2018. [crossref]
33.
Mok C, Chan K, Ho L. Association of depressive/anxiety symptoms with quality of life and work ability in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clinical and experimental rheumatology. 2016;34(3):389-95.
34.
Baker K, Pope J. Employment and work disability in systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review. Rheumatology. 2009;48(3):281-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Tunnicliffe DJ, Singh-Grewal D, Chaitow J, Mackie F, Manolios N, Lin MW, et al. Lupus means sacrifices: Perspectives of adolescents and young adults with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care & Research. 2016;68(6):828-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Haikel KAB, Al Tulaihi B. Awareness of systemic lupus erythematosus among primary health care patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2019;40(2):177. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52712.16276

Date of Submission: Oct 04, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Jan 02, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Mar 16, 2022
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: Funded by Kashan Medical Science University under grant number 9907.
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 22, 201
• Manual Googling: Feb 14, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Mar 21, 2022 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com