Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 35973

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : June | Volume : 16 | Issue : 6 | Page : YC05 - YC07 Full Version

Effect of BMI on Tightness of Iliopsoas Muscle in Students due to Prolonged Sitting for Online Classes During COVID-19 Pandemic


Published: June 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/56795.16419
Neha Goyal, Vaishali Chaudhary

1. Master Scholar, Department of Physiotherapy, IAMR, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, IAMR, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Vaishali Chaudhary,
NH-58, Delhi-Meerut Road, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail : vaishali.chaudhary@iamr.ac.in

Abstract

Introduction: Muscle tightness is produced by a reduction in a muscle’s capacity to deform. As a result of prolong sitting pelvic position can be changed which can lead to iliopsoas tightness. During the COVID-19 pandemic, as a result of online classes, student’s hours of sitting have increased drastically.

Aim: To compare iliopsoas muscle tightness in students who were engaged in prolonged sitting due to online classes with higher Body Mass Index (BMI) and students with normal BMI.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Physiotherapy at Institute of Applied Medicine and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India, from April 2021 to January 2022 on 101 students. Height and weight of the subject were measured by the ruler and digital weighing machine respectively for the BMI calculation. Two groups were made, group with normal BMI students and group with High BMI students. Using modified Thomas test, iliopsoas muscle were measured for the flexibility. Independent sample t-test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Total 51 students were with normal BMI and 50 were with higher BMI were included in the study. The mean age of the subjects was 19.59 years including 59 females and 42 males. The significantly increased Modified Thomas Test (MTT) angle was found in students with higher BMI when compared to students with normal BMI for both right (p-value=0.003) and left side (p-value <0.001). Iliopsoas muscle tightness was present in more in higher BMI group as compared to normal BMI group.

Conclusion: The study concluded that both the groups had the iliopsoas muscle tightness but the students with higher BMI had more muscle tightness.

Keywords

Coronavirus disease, Flexibility, Modified thomas test, Online classes, Sedentary lifestyle, Universal goniometer

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought to light a number of issues that had previously gone unnoticed but were impacting individuals in the same way, with the only difference being "severity." The main concern that has arisen is the flexibility of the muscles in students; as a result of online classes, students' hours of sitting have increased drastically, negatively impacting their physical activity. The muscular tightness is caused by decreased in the ability of muscle to deform which is the results of sedentary lifestyle making physical activity or Activity of Daily Living (ADLs) difficult (1). Individuals whose work required sitting throughout the day are more prone to develop musculoskeletal discomfort or adaptive shortening of muscles especially at hip joint (2).

A previous study shows strong evidence for work related musculoskeletal disorder present in bankers due to work related stress (3). Flexibility is an important factor for the normal biomechanical function. Iliopsoas is one of the hip flexor muscles that originate from iliac fossa and lumbar spine and inserted to lesser trochanter of femur (4). As a result of prolonged sitting, pelvic tilting can occur, which can cause iliopsoas muscle tension and raise the risk of injury due to the excessive pressure on muscles while sitting (5),(6),(7).

Flexibility is an important factor in physical and health related fitness and for execution and sustainability of ADLs (8). If any changes or alteration takes place in flexibility of muscles, it leads to difficulty in ADLs (9),(10). Overweight/obesity has the strongest association with low back pain and chronic low back pain (11). Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of comparing iliopsoas muscle tightness in students with high Body Mass Index (BMI) and those with normal BMI who have been sitting for long period of time for online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in iliopsoas muscle tightness between students with higher BMI and with normal BMI.

Alternative hypothesis: There is significant difference in iliopsoas muscle tightness between students with higher BMI and with BMI.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Physiotherapy at Institute of Applied Medicine and Research, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India, from April 2021 to January 2022 on 101 students. Institutional Ethical Clearance was taken from IAMR, Ghaziabad, (Ref. No. IAMR/22/3196) and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 that was revised in 2013 was also considered.

Inclusion criteria: Age group of 17- 25 years, with minimum 5 -8 hours of sitting per day and within the normal BMI ranges (18.5 to <24.9 Kg/m2) and higher BMI ranges (25.0 to29.9 Kg/m2) were included in the study (12).

Exclusion criteria: Below the age of 17 years and above the age of 25 years, students with any complaint of Lower Back Pain (LBP), hip pain, knee pain or some kind of accident or trauma and any lower limb surgery were excluded from the study.

This study was conducted with the students taking online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. The participants in this study were voluntary and an informed consent was obtained before the beginning of the test. The participating students were briefed about the purpose of this study and informed that the data or the information collected from them will remain confidential. The students were evaluated for the BMI calculated as weight (Kg)/ height squared (m2) (12) and iliopsoas muscle tightness using the standardized testing procedure that is modified thomas test using the universal goniometer (13),(14).

Procedure

The subject was asked to stand on the digital weighing machine for the weight measurement and made the subject to stand against the wall for the height measurement with the help of ruler.

Modified Thomas Test (MTT): The subject was made to sit at the edge of the examination table and roll back onto the table while pulling both knees towards the chest. This is to ensure that the lumbar spine is flat on the table and the pelvic is posteriorly rotated. The subject was asked to hold the contralateral lower limb toward the chest and lower the other limb towards the floor. For each side, angle of hip flexion were measured using a universal goniometer. The stationary arm of goniometer was aligned with the lateral midline of the pelvic and moving arm was aligned with midline of the femur using lateral epicondyle as a reference point. The hip joint at 0 degree is considered at neutral position anything above this range was considered as iliopsoas muscle tightness or flexibility of iliopsoas muscle is considered as the angle of hip flexion (15),(16) (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2).

Statistical Analysis

The independent sample t-test has been used through the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 IBM software with the 5% significance level.

Results

Out of 101 students, 59 were females and 42 were males, with mean age of 19.59±1.801 years. Demographic data of both the groups is given in (Table/Fig 3). The mean BMI of normal BMI group (20.90±2.54 kg/m2) was significantly less than the mean BMI of higher group (25.99±2.54 Kg/m2) with p-value <0.001

Out of total, 51 were with normal BMI and 50 were with higher BMI. Modified Thomas test value of 7.91±4.718 was recorded for right side. For the left side mean MTT value were 7.52±4.768. Mean MTT value of 6.57 and 5.90 was recorded for the right and left side respectively for students with normal BMI. At the same time mean of 9.28 and 9.18 was recorded for the right and left side MTT values respectively for students with higher BMI. Significantly increased MTT angle was found in students with higher BMI when compared to students with normal BMI for both right (p-value=0.003) and left sided (p-value <0.001). Iliopsoas muscle tightness was present more in higher BMI group as compared to normal BMI group (Table/Fig 4).

Discussion

The study demonstrated that the BMI has an impact on the muscle tightness. An increase in the BMI led to an increase in the tightness of muscles. Previous study showed that to perform a specific activity or sport sufficient flexibility needs to be obtained (16). This study supports the statement as prolong sitting lead to muscle tightness which can make the ADLs difficult.

The primary health results assumed to be linked with flexibility are relief from low-back pain, prevention of musculoskeletal damage, and better-quality posture (5),(10). A sedentary lifestyle is considered as a risk factor for LBP among the general population, but it is also known that youths who do not practice physical exercise are far more likely to become sedentary adults (1). Also another previous study by Pradip B et al., stated that hip muscles tightness could develop in desk job professionals making them prone for musculoskeletal discomforts (1). Hip joint is surrounded by various muscles, among which the Iliopsoas is the main muscles which can go for tightness after a prolonged period of sitting especially in students and desk job people (7). In the present study, authors only focused on the iliopsoas muscle as it is known that iliopsoas muscle is the only muscle that connects lumbar spine to the hip. In case of shortening, it increases the anterior pelvic tilt and puts excessive strain on the lumbar spine as well as on the intervertebral disc resulting in low back pain (1),(4).

It has already been concluded by the many researchers that the iliopsoas muscle tightness is present in prolong desk job workers and in the Information Technology (IT) professionals (2),(3). However, information about the student population and the influence of BMI on iliopsoas muscle stiffness was not found. Hence, the present study was focused on the same.

In previous studies, one or more musculoskeletal health symptoms were reported by 94% of IT professionals in the past 12 months (1),(2),(6). Previous study had cited that 5 hour per day as being a critical time for the development of musculoskeletal disorder and muscle tightness in employees working with visual display unit (6). Hence, the subjects included in this study were college students from 17 to 25 years of age who spend minimum 5-8 hours in sitting position. In the present study it was found that the students with higher BMI and with normal BMI both have iliopsoas muscle tightness but the higher BMI students were more prone for tightness as compared to the normal BMI students who were engaged in the prolong sitting. As a result, individuals are prone to low back pain or other symptoms associated with the back or hip in some point of time in their life (1).

Limitation(s)

The sample size was small and pelvic tilt position can be altered during the modified Thomas test.

Conclusion

In this study iliopsoas muscle tightness was present in both groups i.e. normal and higher BMI in both right and left side. However, the higher BMI (overweight) students had more iliopsoas muscle tightness as compared to normal BMI students. Hence, the alternative hypothesis was accepted. Although, iliopsoas muscle flexibility is an important aspect that impact the ADLs, future research is required with the obese group of subjects as sedentary lifestyle is the major cause of it.

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to all the participants who participated in the process of data collection and fellow MPT Scholar, Tarunjit Kaur for supporting me throughout the research process. No technical, financial support was received for the study from any person or organization.

References

1.
Pradip B, Sudhir B, Nidhi B. Prevalence of tightness in hip muscles in middle aged Indian men engaging in prolonged desk jobs: A descriptive study. International journal of physical education, sports and health. 2018:15-21.
2.
Bashyal P, Bhatbolan S, Billore N, Sindhu N. Flexibility in muscles around the hip among middle aged Indian men engaging in prolonged desk jobs: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health. 2018;5(1):223-29.
3.
Islam S. Prevalence of common work related musculoskeletal disorders among the bankers at Savar (Doctoral dissertation, Bangladesh Health Professions Institute, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh). 2016.
4.
Mondal M, Sarkar B, Alam S, Das S, Malik K, Kumar P, et al. Prevalence of piriformis tightness in healthy sedentary individuals: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research. 2017;7(7):134-42.
5.
Koli BK, Anap DB. Prevalence and severity of hamstring tightness among college student: A cross sectional study. International Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Research. 2018:65-68. [crossref]
6.
Vijay SA. Work-related musculoskeletal health disorders among the information technology professionals in India: A prevalence study. International Journal of Management Research and Business Strategy. 2013;2(2):118-28.
7.
Kim GM, Ha SM. Reliability of the modified Thomas test using a lumbo-plevic stabilization. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(2):447-9. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Clapis PA, Davis SM, Davis RO. Reliability of inclinometer and goniometric measurements of hip extension flexibility using the modified Thomas test. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24(2):135-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Malai S, Pichaiyongwongdee S, Sakulsriprasert P. Immediate Effect of Hold-Relax Stretching of Iliopsoas Muscle on Transversus Abdominis Muscle Activation in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain with Lumbar Hyperlordosis.J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98:S6-11.
10.
Shah MM, Tiwari S. Flexibility of the lower back and hamstring muscles among 14 to 17 year old school boys. International Journal of Physical Education, Sports and Health. 2016;3(6):370-72.
11.
Shiri R, Karppinen J, Leino-Arjas P, Solovieva S, Viikari-Juntura E. The association between obesity and low back pain: A meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(2):135-54.s [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
National Heart, Lung, Blood Institute, National Institute of Diabetes, Kidney Diseases (US). Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; 1998.
13.
Vigotsky AD, Lehman GJ, Beardsley C, Contreras B, Chung B, Feser EH. The modified Thomas test is not a valid measure of hip extension unless pelvic tilt is controlled. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2325. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Grieshaber DT. Assessing the Reliability of Two Orthopedic Special Tests to Determine Hip Flexor Contracture with the Assessment of Pelvic Tilt Angle during a Back Squat (Doctoral dissertation, North Dakota State University). 2008.
15.
Roach KE, Miles TP. Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Physical therapy. 1991;71(9):656-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Harvey D. Assessment of the flexibility of elite athletes using the modified Thomas test. Br J Sports Med. 1998;32(1):68. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56795.16419

Date of Submission: Mar 31, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Apr 23, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 12, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 04, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 11, 2022
• iThenticate Software: May 14, 2022 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com