Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 110900

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : June | Volume : 16 | Issue : 6 | Page : ZC66 - ZC70 Full Version

Outcome of Conventional versus Digital Mode of Behaviour Modification With or Without Maternal Presence in Paediatric Dental Patients- A Pilot Study


Published: June 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55427.16540
Neetika Verma, Anil Gupta, Shalini Garg, Shikha Dogra, Sakshi Joshi, Parika Vaid

1. Postgraduate, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 3. Professor, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 4. Reader, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 5. Senior Lecturer, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 6. Postgraduate, Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shikha Dogra,
Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
E-mail: shikha.dogra@sgtuniversity.org

Abstract

Introduction: In managing paediatric patients most common challenge is to encounter child’s fear and anxiety during dental procedures. In modern era smart phone dentist games can be used as a modification of Tell Show Do (TSD) technique.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of different behaviour modification techniques in paediatric patients at first dental visit and to compare conventional techniques: TSD, TSD + maternal presence, Mobile Dental game (MD) and MD + maternal presence as behaviour modification techniques in preschool children.

Materials and Methods: The present pilot study (a randomized parallel group clinical trial) was conducted in the Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry of Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurugram,Haryana from July 2021 to December 2021 over a period of 6 months in 80 children Between the age group of 4 to 6 years with deft (d=decayed, e=extracted due to caries, f=filled, t=teeth) <3 and caries in any primary second molar indicated for Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) filling, visiting the dentist for the first time. Patient with Frankl behaviour rating score of 1 and 2 accompanied by their mothers with positive dental attitude were included. Patients were equally divided into four groups. Behaviour was assessed using Frankl behaviour rating scale, Raghavendra, Madhuri, Sujata Pictorial scale (RMS-PS) and Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale before and after treatment.

Results: The mean age of patients in the study was 4.99±0.92 years. The difference between pre and post Frankl behaviour rating score and RMS-PS were statistically significant in all the four groups (p<0.01), whereas difference in pre and post FLACC score was significant in group 2 and 4 (p<0.01). On comparing mean RMS-PS between four groups, significant difference was observed in group 1 and 4 (p<0.01). When mean FLACC score was compared, significant difference was observed between mean scores of Group 1 compared to Group 2 and Group 4.

Conclusion: In the present study all the behaviour modification techniques showed improvement in child’s behaviour but use of digital mode of behaviour management along with maternal presence in paediatric dental operatory had displayed significantly better results.

Keywords

Behaviour rating scale, Mobile application, Preschool children, Smartphone

In managing paediatric patients most common challenge is to encounter child’s fear and anxiety during dental procedure. These issues can jeopardize the quality and efficacy of dental care in children and if not dealt properly this fear can be transferred into adulthood leading to avoidance and delays in seeking for dental care. Therefore anxiety management in children is one of the most important factors that can help guarantee a successful care. It is always expected by the parents from a paediatric dentist to deliver quality services in child patients, as compared to a general dentist (1),(2).

Effective and efficiently done dental treatment results in favorable outcome even on follow-up visits if behaviour management techniques are used for managing anxious and fearful child. Behaviour guidance techniques are used to alleviate anxiety, nurture a positive dental attitude, and to help provide a high quality oral health care safely and Efficiently as suggested by American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (AAPD) (3). Today less aggressive behaviour management techniques such as tell-show-do, modelling, distraction etc. are preferred (4). The TSD is a conventional approach used since years in children as a behaviour management technique in Paediatric dentisty. The TSD technique, introduced by Addelston, which is based on the principles of learning theory and is being performed by dentists themselves in the operatory (5),(6).

Since smartphones are being very commonly used and technologically advanced, they can be equipped with proper simulation games to act as a new, convenient, and economical way to reduce dental anxiety in children needing dental treatments. Smart phone dentist games can be used as a modification of TSD by demonstrating animated pictures of the use of common dental equipment like airotor, ultrasonic scalers, suction tip, etc. with visual and sound effects, giving the child a first hand experience of their usage, sounds produced, and clinical effects obtained. It acts as an interactive modelling and desensitization technique as well as active distraction with patient participation. It helps the dentist to easily communicate with the child patient using animated figures in the game (7),(8),(9).

There is extensive documentation in the literature for the role of parental presence or absence as a behaviour modification technique in managing child patients (10). One parenting factor consistently found to be associated with child anxiety that plausibly contributes to shaping children’s negative behaviour is maternal acceptance. Mother’s warm and accepting responses to their child’s feelings and behaviours provides an environment that allows children to feel safe and secure, enables children to better tolerate the experience of fear and thus show less avoidance of feared stimuli and situations. Hence, maternal presence in the operatory at child’s first dental visit can be used as an effective behaviour modification technique for fearful and anxious child (11),(12),(13).

For any treatment, whether requiring a single or multiple visit, invasive or non-invasive, there is a need to alleviate fear and anxiety at first dental visit to gain child’s confidence, so that he/she doesn’t possess a barrier while providing dental services. This was one of its kind study regarding digital motivation in children. Therefore this pilot study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of four different behavioural modification techniques; TSD as control, TSD with maternal presence, modified TSD i.e. smartphone dental game and modified TSD with maternal presence.

Material and Methods

The present pilot study (a randomized parallel group clinical trial) was conducted in the Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry of Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India, from July 2021 to December 2021 over a period of six months. An informed consent was obtained from the parents of the children participating in the study as per following inclusion and exclusion criteria:-

Inclusion criteria:

• Age group of 4 to 6 years.
• Children with no previous dental experience.
• Children with deft score <3.
• Caries in any primary second molar indicated for GIC restoration.
• No learning disability.
• Patients accompanying their mother.
• Frankl’s behaviour rating score of 1 or 2 (14).

Exclusion criteria:

• Children with physical and mental disabilities.
• Children presenting with dental emergencies.
• Parents refusing to provide consent for participation.

Study Procedure

As per inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 223 patients were screened, out of which 92 fulfilled the inclusion criteria in this study but 12 parents of children refused to give consent for participation. Therefore, rest 80 patients (whose parents consented to participate in the study) were enrolled into four different groups using chit method:

Group 1 (control group): TSD (Table/Fig 1)a
Group 2: TSD with maternal presence (Table/Fig 1)b
Group 3: Mobile MG (Table/Fig 1)c
Group 4: MG with maternal presence (Table/Fig 1)d.

A single operator performed the behaviour management technique and dental procedure, while a second investigator monitored and recorded child’s behaviour before and after treatment to minimize bias.

Preintervention assessment: An independent investigator observed child’s behaviour before intervention using Frankl’s behaviour rating scale, Raghavendra, Madhuri, Sujata Pictorial Scale (RMS-PS) and Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale (14),(15),(16).

Frankl behaviour rating scale separates observed behaviours into four categories: definitely negative (1) to definitely positive (4) (14). RMS-PS comprises a row of five faces ranging from very happy to very unhappy (1 to 5) (15). FLACC consists of five behavioural categories, facial expression, leg movement, bodily activity, cry, and consolability, each rated on a scale of 0 to 2 to provide a maximum overall pain score of 10. In this study, grading was used as 1- relaxed (0), 2- mild (1-3), 3- moderate (4-6) and 4- severe discomfort (7-10) (16).

Scoring was done for each patient individually by the same investigator before and after the treatment using these three scales. Scoring of Frankl’s behaviour rating scale and FLACC scale were based on investigator’s assessment of child’s behaviour, whereas, for RMS-PS, children were asked to choose the face they feel like about themselves at the end of treatment. Treatment was done in his/her first clinical dental procedure.

Intervention: In group 1, TSD. technique was used for managing anxious and fearful patients (17). Patients were told about the procedure to be performed and got familiarized with dental equipment to be used. Then the operator performed restoration exactly as explained and demonstrated to the patients.

In group 2, TSD technique was used along with the passive presence of mother in the operatory during the whole procedure.

In group 3, patients were made to play mobile dental game named Dentist (developed by YovoGames for age 4+) while the operator explained the procedure alongside.

In group 4, mother was allowed to sit in the operatory and behaviour modification was done using mobile dental game.

Favorable outcome meant that the patient was positive or definitely positive, i.e score 3 or 4 according to Frankl’s scale. In RMS-PS happy to normal i.e. 1 to 3 was favorable outcome and in FLACC relaxed to mild discomfort was taken as favorable outcome.

Statistical Analysis

The data collected was entered into Microsoft Excel and then transferred to Statistical Analysis for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. Categorical data was presented in the form of proportion. Both intergroup and intragroup statistical analysis was done using student t-test, Chi-square test and one-way ANOVA test for the test of significance. All the statistical tests were performed at 5% significance level.

Results

A total of 80 patients, meeting the inclusion criteria, were evaluated in this study with a mean age of 4.99±0.92 years. Demographic details of the sample is given in (Table/Fig 2). No significant difference was found between the four groups in terms of mean age, mean deft score and gender distribution (p-value >0.05). The mean operating time in ascending order was, group 4 (14 minutes) < group 3 (15 minutes) = group 2 (15 minutes) > group 1 (18 minutes). Group 1 was most difficult to manage.

Intragroup comparison of pre and post mean values of Frankl score, RMS-PS and FLACC score in group 1, 2, 3 and 4:

a. Analysis of mean Frankl behaviour rating score: On intragroup comparison of mean Frankl behaviour rating score, significant improvement was observed in behaviour of patients in all four groups (p<0.001) after treatment completion according to student’s paired t-test (Table/Fig 3), (Table/Fig 4).
No significant difference was found between percentages of males and females showing post-treatment positive behaviour (p value: group 1-0.66, group 2-0.56, group 3-0.65, group 4-0.42) (Table/Fig 5).
b. Analysis of mean RMS-PS: Comparison of pre and post-treatment mean RMS-PS scores of the four groups is shown in (Table/Fig 6). Significant difference was observed in pre and post-treatment mean RMS-PS scores in all the four groups (Table/Fig 6), (Table/Fig 7).
c. Analysis of mean FLACC scores: Statistically significant difference was observed in pre and post-treatment scores of group 2 and group 4 according to paired student’s t-test (Table/Fig 8), (Table/Fig 9).

Intergroup comparison of post-operative mean Frankl score, RMS-PS and FLACC score: One-way ANOVA was used for intergroup comparison (Table/Fig 10). Significant difference was seen in mean Frankl behaviour rating score when group 1 and group 2 were compared with group 3 and 4 individually. For mean RMS-PS, significant difference was only seen between group 1 and group 4. When mean FLACC score was compared, significant difference was observed between mean scores of group 1 compared to group 2 and group 4.

Discussion

The behaviour management of an anxious child patients is an integral part of paediatric dental practice. Various behaviour modification techniques are used to establish communication, alleviate fear and anxiety, build a trusting relationship between dentist, child, and parent, and promote the child’s positive attitude towards oral healthcare to facilitate delivery of quality dental care (18).

The dentist must have a basic understanding of the cognitive development of the child. Establishment of communication and implementation of proper behaviour guidance technique, according to patient’s developmental status, are important to obtain desired behaviour outcome. Children in the age group of 4-6 years are ideal for testing behaviour modification techniques, as they are in the stage of developing vocabulary, attention and concentration. They tend to understand the verbal commands and respond to the behaviour modification techniques in an accurate manner (19).

Also, for a preschool aged child, attachment and separation anxiety often play an important role (20). According to Olsen NH, one should avoid separation of the child from parents during their initial visits as their presence may help in the prediction of future child’s behaviour (20). On the other hand, according to Feigal RJ et al., parent may exhibit anxiety and their presence may complicate communication with the child (21). According to a theoretical model warm and accepting responses to a child’s negative internal experiences, on the part of the mother, reduce the behavioural impact of negative experiences and hence leading to less avoidance behaviour by the child (11). Hence, in the present study presence of mothers with positive dental attitude in the operatory was used as one of the behaviour management technique in children with age of 4-6 years.

Again, concept of developing intelligence is applicable to this learning stage of 4-6 years, where child’s cooperative behaviour can be achieved by making them understand about new dental equipment and procedure. TSD approach is widely used by dentists to alleviate fear and anxiety in children related to new dental instruments and procedures. It is a behaviour guidance technique that involves communication and education, which ultimately builds trust and alleviates fear and anxiety. Closely aligned with desensitisation, this is a method of introducing child patients to a procedure in a stepwise fashion (5),(6),(22).

In recent scenario of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), where most of the activities of children are on online platform, Mobile dental games can be used to increase patient’s acceptability towards dental procedures. Mobile dental games serve as a versatile behaviour modification technique as it acts as a modification of TSD technique and helps in desensitization and distraction of child patients (23). It also gives a sense of authority, as patient himself perform dental procedures on animated characters in the game, building confidence and decreasing the feeling of fear and anxiety (24). According to Radhakrishna S et al., effective handling of patients during the procedure was observed when mobile dental game was used as a behaviour modification technique (25). In a study conducted by Elicherla SR et al., a significant reduction in heart rate was observed in children with dental application group when compared to TSD group indicating reduced anxiety (26).

In the present study, as discussed above, all these factors were emphasized, i.e. maternal presence, TSD and mobile dental game, to analyse the best possible way to manage uncooperative children in the age group of 4-6 years, so that, acceptability of these children can be enhanced who otherwise are left untreated by general dentists leading to progression of complications in oral health. In the present study, children with Frankl negative or definitely negative behaviour were included. The Frankl behaviour rating scale is commonly used by researchers to study the child's behaviour toward different variables. According to a study conducted by Asokan S et al., the sensitivity and specificity scores were 93.4% and 62.5% for Frankl’s behaviour rating scale (27). Another scale used in the study was FLACC scale which has shown excellent sensitivity (98%) and good specificity (88%) in a study conducted by Bai J et al., (28). A new anxiety rating scale was introduced by Shetty RM et al., called the RMS-PS scale (29). RMS-PS has shown strong correlation with Venham Picture Test (VPT), hence it can be used as a valid scale to assess child’s dental anxiety. This scale was chosen as it is easy for the child patients, takes very short time and patients can relate better to the child’s facial expressions used in the scale (29).

In the present study, all the four groups showed improvement in child’s behaviour according to Frankl behaviour rating scale. Significant number of patients in group 3 (75%) and group 4 (85%) showed positive behaviour when compared to group 1 (40%). Which means, mobile dental game alone and along with maternal presence helped patients to cope up with anxiety and fear related to new dental environment and equipment. Similar results were obtained in a study conducted by Radhakrishna S et al., with 85% of the patients showing positive behaviour after playing smartphone dentist game (25).

According to RMS-PS, significant improvement was observed in post-treatment scores of Group 2, and 4. Similarly, the pre-treatment and post-treatment mean FLACC scores in group 2 and group 4 showed significant difference. Patients in group 4 (80%) showed significantly better results in relation to group 1 whereas group 3 (40%) showed insignificant improvement.

In the present study mobile dental game showed better results compared to conventional TSD technique. Smartphone dental game simulate various dental procedures to the child patient and are far superior to the TSD technique in reducing anxiety and in managing the child effectively (30). Patil VH et al., conducted a study on 60 children who were made to use a mobile dental application (30). The results were found to be highly significant; 1.67% from definitely negative to negative 86.67% of patients turned from a negative to positive behaviour, 11.67% from positive to definitely positive, and according to Frankl’s behaviour rating scale.

Another observation in the study was that presence of mother in the operatory significantly improved child’s behaviour. In a study conducted by Pani SC et al., parental presence resulted in significantly lower heart rates suggesting that the presence of the parent calms the child and is a form of reassurance (31). According to another study conducted by Vasiliki B et al., according to the paediatric dentist’s rating, children’s behaviour was worse when the parent was absent (32).

In this study, patients with TSD along with maternal presence showed better results than TSD alone, similarly, patients with MG along with maternal presence showed better results than MG alone. Patients in control group (group 1 i.e TSD) showed least improvement in their behaviour at the end of treatment.

Limitation(s)

As this study was a pilot study with small sample size, studies with large sample size and age defined dental game applications need to be developed. Level of understanding of the child regarding mobile game application depends upon his daily use of gadgets. This factor was not considered in the present study.

Conclusion

Behaviour guidance of fearful and anxious paediatric patients at their first dental visit is a keystone for their future dental appointments and maintenance of oral health. In the present study all the behaviour modification techniques showed improvement in child’s behaviour but use of digital mode of behaviour management along with maternal presence in paediatric dental operatory had shown significantly better results than other techniques. Hence, for preschool children, digital modification of TSD technique i.e. mobile dental game, can be used along with emotional support from mother as a behaviour modification technique.

References

1.
Gustafsson A, Arnrup K, Broberg AG, Bodin L, Berggren U. Psychosocial concomitants to dental fear and behaviour management problems. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007;17(6):449-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Hakeberg M, Berggren U, Grondahl HG. A radiographic study of dental health in adult patients with dental anxiety. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993;21(1):27-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Behavior guidance for the pediatric dental patient. The Reference Manual of Pediatric Dentistry. Chicago, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry; 2021:306-24.
4.
Elango I, Baweja DK, Shivaprakash PK. Parental acceptance of pediatric behavior management techniques: A comparative study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012;30(3):195-200. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Wright GZ, Stigers JI. Non-pharmacologic management of children’s behaviors. In: Dean JA, Avery DR, McDonald RE, editors. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescence. 9th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co.; 2011. p. 30. Back to cited text no. 9.
6.
Townsend JA. Behaviour guidance of the paediatric dental patient. In: Casa Massimo PS, Fields HW, McTigue DJ, Nowak AJ, editors. Paediatric Dentistry - Infancy through Adolescence. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. p. 358.
7.
Radhakrishna S, Srinivasan I, Setty JV, D R MK, Melwani A, Hegde KM. Comparison of three behavior modification techniques for management of anxious children aged 4-8 years. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019;19(1):29-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Elicherla SR, Bandi S, Nuvvula S, Challa RS, Saikiran KV, Priyanka VJ. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of a mobile app (Little Lovely Dentist) and the tell-show-do technique in the management of dental anxiety and fear: A randomized controlled trial. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019;19(6):369-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Meshki R, Basir L, Alidadi F, Behbudi A, Rakhshan V. Effects of Pretreatment Exposure to Dental Practice Using a Smartphone Dental Simulation Game on Children’s Pain and Anxiety: A Preliminary Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. J Dent (Tehran). 2018;15(4):250-58.
10.
Riba H, Al-Shahrani A, Al-Ghutaimel H, Al-Otaibi A, Al-Kahtani S. Parental Presence/Absence in the Dental Operatory as a Behavior Management Technique: A Review and Modified View. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018;19(2):237-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Shimshoni Y, Silverman WK, Byrne SP, Lebowitz ER. Maternal Acceptance Moderates Fear Ratings and Avoidance Behavior in Children. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2018;49(3):460-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Gottman JM, Katz LF, Hooven C. Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 1997.
13.
Venham LL. The effect of mother’s presence of child’s response to dental treatment. ASDC J Dent Child. 1979;46(3):219-25.
14.
Frankl SN, Shiere FR, Fogels HR. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory? J Dent Child. 1962;29:150-63.
15.
Shetty RM, Khandelwal M, Rath S. RMS Pictorial Scale (RMS-PS): An innovative scale for the assessment of child’s dental anxiety. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015;33(1):48-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: A behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997;23(3):293-97.
17.
Wright GZ, Kupietzky A. Behaviour Management in Dentistry for Children. 2nd ed. US: Wiley Blackwell Publishers; 2014. p. 24-5. [crossref]
18.
Kawia HM, Mbawalla HS, Kahabuka FK. Application of behavior management techniques for paediatric dental patients by Tanzanian dental practitioners. Open Dent J. 2015;9:455-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Vishwakarma AP, Bondarde PA, Patil SB, Dodamani AS, Vishwakarma PY, Mujawar SA. Effectiveness of two different behavioral modification techniques among 5-7-year-old children: A randomized controlled trial. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017;35:143-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Olsen NH. The first appointment - A mutual evaluation session. J Dent Child. 1965;32:208-11.
21.
Feigal RJ. Guiding and managing the child dental patient: a fresh look at old pedagogy. J Dent Educ. 2001;65:1369-77. [crossref]>[crossref]
22.
Roberts JF, Curzon ME, Koch G, Martens LC. Review: Behaviour management techniques in paediatric dentistry. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010;11(4):166-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Kevadia MV, Sandhyarani B, Patil AT, Gunda SA. Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Tell-Play-Do, Film Modeling and Use of Smartphone Dental Application in the Management of Child Behavior. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(6):682-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Dag NC, Turkkan E, Kacar A, Dag H. Children’s only profession: Playing with toys. North Clin Istanb. 2021;8(4):414-20.
25.
Radhakrishna S, Srinivasan I, Setty JV, D R MK, Melwani A, Hegde KM. Comparison of three behavior modification techniques for management of anxious children aged 4-8 years. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019;19(1):29-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Elicherla SR, Bandi S, Nuvvula S, Challa RS, Saikiran KV, Priyanka VJ. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of a mobile app (Little Lovely Dentist) and the tell-show-do technique in the management of dental anxiety and fear: A randomized controlled trial. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019;19(6):369-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Asokan S, Surendran S, Punugoti D, Nuvvula S, Geetha Priya PR. Validation of a novel behavior prediction scale: A two-center trial. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014;5(4):514-17. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.142821. PMID: 25395769; PMCID: PMC4229762. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Bai J, Hsu L, Tang Y, van Dijk M. Validation of the COMFORT Behavior scale and the FLACC scale for pain assessment in Chinese children after cardiac surgery. Pain Manag Nurs. 2012;13(1):18-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Shetty RM, Khandelwal M, Rath S. RMS Pictorial Scale (RMS-PS): An innovative scale for the assessment of child’s dental anxiety. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015;33(1):48-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Patil VH, Vaid K, Gokhale NS, Shah P, Mundada M, Hugar SM. Evaluation of effectiveness of dental apps in management of child behaviour: A pilot study. Int J Pedod Rehabil. 2017;2:14-18. [crossref]
31.
Pani SC, AlAnazi GS, AlBaragash A, AlMosaihel M. Objective assessment of the influence of the parental presence on the fear and behavior of anxious children during their first restorative dental visit. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(Suppl 2):S148-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Vasiliki B, Konstantinos A, Vassilis K, Nikolaos K, van Loveren C, Jaap V. The effect of parental presence on the child’s perception and co-operation during dental treatment. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2016;17(5):381-86. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55427.16540

Date of Submission: Feb 03, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 22, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 04, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 08, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 21, 2022
• iThenticate Software: May 03, 2022 (21%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com