Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 136989

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : August | Volume : 16 | Issue : 8 | Page : VC06 - VC09 Full Version

Referral Pattern of Inpatients to Psychiatry Department and the Diagnostic Concordance between the Referral Departments and Psychiatry Team- A Retrospective Study


Published: August 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55526.16809
Iniyan Selvamani, Aswin Sasidharan, B Haritha Sree, B Minu Rekha, Sumedha Dondapati

1. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. MBBS Undergraduate, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Government Vellore Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Iniyan Selvamani,
Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Saveetha Medical College, Saveetha Nagar, Thandalam, Chennai Bengaluru, NH 48, Chennai-602105, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: iniyanmbbs@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The referral of inpatients to psychiatry team is more in India due to the increase in the morbidity rates of people. The referrals to Psychiatric Department with a specific psychiatric diagnosis are considerably very low. Most often, the diagnosis made by the clinicians does not match with that of the psychiatrist. Physical illness is shown to have a strong association with psychiatric co-morbidity. Such association complicates the course and outcome of both the conditions.

Aim: To evaluate the pattern of inpatient referral to the Psychiatric Department and to estimate the diagnostic concordance between the referral and psychiatric team.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study, with prior permission from the Department of Psychiatry, included all the inpatient referrals (n=310) to Psychiatry Department by other departments from January 2019 to December 2019. Data collection was done from March 2020 to August 2020 and data analysis from September 2020 to November 2020, in Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.Data was obtained from a psychiatry referral register and was statistically analysed using Microsoft Excel (MS Office 2013) for percentage, mean and Standard Deviation (SD) for descriptive variables. Diagnostic concordance to assess the reason for referral and diagnostic accuracy in terms of reason of referral and psychiatric diagnosis was analysed using kappa statistics.

Results: The most common psychiatric disorder for referral was alcohol dependence syndrome 102 (32.9%) followed by depression 38 (12.3%) and adjustment disorders 34 (10.9%). Concordance was good for intellectual disorder (κ=1.00), depression (κ=0.969) and alcohol dependence syndrome (κ=0.963). Very low concordance was observed in diagnosing acute confusional state (κ=0.195) and panic disorder (κ=0).

Conclusion: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome, adjustment disorder and depression were the most common reasons in referring inpatients to psychiatry. Lower concordance for psychiatric disorders like acute confusional state and panic disorder could be explained by inadequate psychiatry exposure and hence be improved by better undergraduate psychiatry training.

Keywords

Alcohol, Delirium, Depression, Kappa

Physical illness is shown to have a strong association with psychiatric co-morbidity. Such association complicates the course and outcome of both the conditions (1),(2). In the western population, the prevalence of psychiatric co-morbidity among general inpatients varies between 26.5% to 60.0% (2),(3). The prevalence of mental disorders among internal medical inpatients and in acutely ill medical patients was found to be 38.7% and 27.2% respectively (2),(3). According to a study in India, psychiatric morbidity among the inpatients and outpatients referred from other departments was reported to be 31.0-34.5%. Yet, the psychiatry referral rates for inpatients remains very low (0.1-3.6%) (4).

The pattern of referral of inpatients by the physician/surgeon to the psychiatry team also varies among countries. In western countries, among the referred inpatients, the most common psychiatric disorder is major depressive disorder (2) whereas in eastern countries, it is delirium (5). Delirium stands out as the most common diagnosis among patients referred for psychiatric evaluation in a study conducted in Northern India. The other common diagnostic categories were depressive disorders, alcohol dependence syndrome, adjustment disorder and opiod dependence syndrome (4).

The concordance (41.5-47.4%) between the physician’s/surgeon’s diagnosis and those made by the psychiatrists have been evaluated by very few studies (6),(7). The concordance of diagnosis between physicians/surgeons and the psychiatrists among the elderly patients referred to psychiatric services was evaluated by a study conducted in Japan. The results reported the highest concordance for organic brain syndromes (κ=0.47) and low concordance for depression (κ=0.28) and alcoholism (κ=0.27) (7), whereas, a study from Northern India, showed a better concordance for the diagnosis of substance dependence (κ=0.678) and suicidality (κ=0.655) and very low concordance for depressive discorders and delirium with κ<0.3 (4). Inadequacy in the necessary skills required in diagnosing psychiatric disorders is a reason for failure of psychiatric referrals.

Referral rates and psychiatric diagnosis pattern have been evaluated by several studies in India. But the evaluation of diagnostic coincordance between the physicians/surgeons and the diagnosis made by the psychiatrists has been done by only one study in Northern India. So, the present study aimed to evaluate the referral pattern and diagnostic concordance between physicians/surgeons and the psychiatrists among the inpatient referral in South Indian population.

Material and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in Saveetha Medical College in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, after obtaining the approval from the Institutional Review Board and Ethical Committee (IRB No:SMC/IEC/2020/03/340). The study was conducted for a period of nine months with data collection from March 2020 to August 2020 and data analysis from September 2020 to November 2020. All the referrals (n=310) made to the psychiatry team from the various inpatient wards from (January 2019 to December 2019) entered in the Psychiatric Department referral registry were included in the study.

Data Collection

With prior permission from the Psychiatry Department, the data was collected from the referral registry that contains the patients name, age, sex, complaints, referral department diagnosis, co-morbidities if any, primary diagnosis, the complaints related to the referral department and the psychiatric diagnosis made by the psychiatry team. The information about the doctor who made the referral too was also recorded in the registry. A patient referred to the Psychiatry Department was first seen by a junior resident under the supervision of a senior consultant. The final diagnosis was made by senior consultants (n=6) based on the criteria of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10 (8). For critical cases as per ICD 10 (8), evaluation was done after admitting the patient, with regular follow-up till their discharge from the hospital. According to the severity of the psychiatric ailment, the patient was asked to come for a regular visit.

Statistical Analysis

The data collected was analysed using the Microsoft Excel worksheet (MS office 2013). The frequency, percentage, mean and Standard Deviation (SD) were calculated for the descriptive data. The diagnostic concordance between the diagnosis made by the psychiatry team and the referral team was assessed using the Kappa statistics.

Results

In the sample of 310 referrals studied, the age of the patients ranged from 2-84 years with the mean age of 40.6 years with a SD of 16.3. Majority of the referred inpatients age ranged between 36-50 years (33.9%). Both paediatric (<14 years) and geriatric age (>65 years) group referrals were least and were 5.8% and 5.5%, respectively (Table/Fig 1).

Of the 310 patients studied, 199 (64.19%) were males, and 111 (35.81%) were females. Among the referral department, 139 (44.8%) of the referrals were from Medicine Department and 54 (17.4%) from Surgery and 24 (7.7%) were from Orthopaedic surgery. A considerable number of referrals were also obtained from the Emergency (ER) and Paediatric Departments which were about 21 (6.8%) and 18 (5.8%), respectively (Table/Fig 2).

Most common diagnosis for referral was alcohol dependence syndrome 102 (32.9%) followed by depression 38 (12.3%), adjustment disorder 34 (10.9%), insomnia and anxiety disorder each 17 (5.5%).

The frequency of the various diagnoses of the referred inpatients by the referral department and psychiatry team were evaluated, and the pattern of referral is represented graphically (Table/Fig 2). According to the psychiatry team, the most common diagnosis was alcohol dependence syndrome 97 (31.3%) followed by adjustment disorders 48 (15.5%), depression 36 (11.6%), review 31 (10.0%) and anxiety disorder 20 (6.5%).

Diagnostic concordance between the referral physician/surgeons and psychiatrists: Kappa statistics was used to diagnose the concordance between the major psychiatric diseases (i.e., alcohol dependence syndrome, depression, anxiety disorders, adjustment disorders) as per referral physician and psychiatrists and tabulated in (Table/Fig 3).

Referred physicians diagnosed 102 patients with alcohol dependence syndrome, whereas psychiatrists diagnosed with the disease in 97 cases, and the kappa (κ) value for the concordance was found to be 0.963 (Table/Fig 3).

In terms of depression (suicidality, anxiety, crying, not talking, irritability, insomnia), 38 cases were diagnosed with depression by referring physicians while only 36 cases were identified to have depression by psychiatry team. When the concordance value has been calculated using kappa statistics, the κ value was 0.969 (Table/Fig 3).

Diagnosis of anxiety disorder was made by the treating physician, and various symptoms suggestive of an anxiety disorder (crying spells, irrelevant talk, fearfulness, confused state of mind, insomnia, suicidal ideas, worried behaviour) were taken into account for a referral to psychiatrists and 17 cases were identified to have an anxiety disorder, while 20 cases were found to have an anxiety disorder as per psychiatrists and concordance value using kappa statistics was calculated to be 0.914 (Table/Fig 3).

In adjustment disorder, the symptoms were broad, including suicidal attempt (using various substances like all-out, paracetamol, rat killer powder, kerosene, calotropis, iron tablet, ant killer, acid, phenol, alprazolam, cleaning liquid, cetirizine, oleander, insecticide) psychosocial stress, loss of interest, financial crisis, work pressure, sensitive behaviour and interpersonal conflicts. In 34 cases, the referring physician referred the patients for adjustment disorder; however, in the overall sample, diagnosis of adjustment disorder was made in 48 cases by the psychiatrist. The concordance, between the psychiatrist and referring physician, it was evaluated to 0.804 (Table/Fig 3).

Based on the kappa value, the concordance of the diagnosis between the referral and psychiatry team was in perfect agreement (κ=0.81-1.00) for intellectual disorders (e.g. global developmental delay and Intellectual disability) (κ=1), depression (κ=0.969), alcohol dependence syndrome (κ=0.963), psychosis (κ=0.958), schizophrenia (κ=0.921), anxiety disorder (κ=0.914), delirium (κ=0.856), seizure disorder (κ=0.83) and adjustment disorder (κ=0.804) (Table/Fig 3).

The agreement between the referral team and psychiatry team was substantial (κ=0.61-0.80) in the diagnosis of hyperventilation syndrome (κ=0.798), nicotine dependence syndrome (κ=0.747), affective disorder (κ=0.723), autism spectrum disorder (κ=0.665) and bipolar disorder (κ=0.665) (Table/Fig 3).

The concordance in diagnosing the obsessive-compulsive disorder (n=3, κ=0.498) and by the referral and psychiatry team was with a moderate agreement (κ=0.41-0.60). Fair agreement (κ=0.21-0.40) between the teams was observed in diagnosing conversion disorder (n=4, κ=0.397), insomnia (n=3, κ=0.288), Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (n=2, κ=0.258). There was slight (κ=0.01-0.20) or no agreement (κ=0) between the referral and psychiatry team for acute confusional state (n=9, κ=0.195) and panic disorder (n=6, κ=0) respectively (Table/Fig 3).

Discussion

The prevalence of psychiatric disorders was reported to be increased in young patients with physical illness (38.7%) (2). In the present study, the majority of the referred inpatients’ age ranged between 36-50 years (33.9%), and mostly male patients were referred 64.19%. Among the referral department, 44.8% of the referrals were from Medicine Department and 17.4% from Surgery, 7.7% from Orthopaedic surgery. A considerable number of referrals were also obtained from the Emergency (ER) and Paediatric Departments.

In general, there is limited data for reasons of referral to psychiatry team by referral department. Lack of integration of psychiatry and medicine at training level, underestimation of psychiatric co-morbidities by clinicians and their general reluctance are the reasons for low referral rates (9),(10),(11). Studies suggest that the physicians/surgeons were able to report the patient in around 57.0% (n=125) cases using specific psychiatric diagnosis (4).

Earlier studies on the pattern of psychiatric disorders among patients referred to psychiatry suggested that the most common diagnosis were that of delirium, self-harm, depression, substance use disorders, and stress and neurotic disorders among various countries (5),(6),(7),(12) A similar study in Denmark reported that the major diagnoses were somatoform disorders (17.6%), phobias (12.9%), substance use disorders (10.9%), and depression (8.3%) (2). In a study done in Canada, the most common diagnosis was major depressive disorder (5.1%) followed by adjustment disorder (13.7%), anxiety disorder (5.8%), and alcohol dependence or abuse (5.4%) (3). A study in India, suggests that delirium (43.4%) was the most common psychiatric diagnosis in patients referred to psychiatry team, and followed by depressive disorders (11.9%), alcohol dependence syndrome (7.3%), adjustment disorder (5.0%), and opioid dependence syndrome (4.6%) (4).

The present study in contrast to the earlier studies showed that the most common psychiatric diagnosis of the inpatients referred to psychiatry team was alcohol dependence syndrome (31.3%) followed by adjustment disorders (15.5%), depression (11.6%), anxiety disorder (6.5%) and psychosis (4.2%). These findings in the present study suggest that curriculum designed for the undergraduate and the psychiatry team must focus on enhancing knowledge, clinical and management skills for these common disorders.

Although in earlier studies, delirium and depression was the most common diagnosis, the present study reports alcohol dependence syndrome to be the most common. The possible reason for this increase in alcohol dependence syndrome is due to social drinking and binge usage of alcohol. Alcohol intake has been increased among teens due to changing lifestyle and changing patterns in pleasure-seeking which could lead to addiction. Among adults, alcohol intake is increased in people who are indulged in heavy working lifestyle as well as in those with a sedentary lifestyle due to physical and mental stress. So, interventions should be made at an individual level, school level, family level and environmental level to minimise the use of alcohol and its overuse related disorders.

Many studies have reported concordance between the physician/surgeons diagnosis, and the diagnosis made by the psychiatrist as only 41.5%-47.4% (6). A study was done in Japan on older people for the diagnostic concordance between the referral departments and psychiatrists and showed kappa statistics of 0.47 for organic brain syndrome, 0.27 for alcoholism, 0.28 for depression and 0.32 for neurosis/insomnia suggesting an insufficient level of diagnostic accuracy for psychiatric disorders by the clinicians (7). In India, a study on the concordance of diagnosis between referral team and psychiatrist has shown low concordance (κ<0.3) for depressive disorders and delirium. But substance dependence (κ=0.678) and suicidality (κ=0.655) had better diagnostic concordance (4).

When compared to other studies, the present study showed overall higher concordance according to kappa values. So, the present study shows that the referral team is better in diagnosing the above disorders. Concordance was low in diagnosing conversion disorder (κ=0.397), insomnia (κ=0.288), alcohol withdrawal syndrome (κ=0.258) and acute confusional state (κ=0.195). Panic disorder (κ=0) remained undiagnosed by the clinician. This suggests that knowledge on diagnosing the disorders with low concordance is poor among the referring physician/surgeon due to deficit in undergraduate psychiatry training.

Previous studies suggest that low concordance may be due to the incomplete knowledge and training during undergraduate level (13),(14). In this study, although the concordance for many diagnoses were very high, the concordance for some illnesses like panic disorder and alcohol withdrawal was very poor. This brings us to suggest that, including psychiatry as a full subject in the undergraduate medical curriculum may improve the diagnostic accuracy of clinicians in other departments.

Limitation(s)

As the study was conducted in a single institute, the results obtained cannot be generalised. Being a retrospective study, the data was not collected in a predesigned proforma as per the specific requirements of the study and so it can affect the accuracy of the data collection. In future, prospective studies with a predesigned proforma can be planned to include several institution functioning in rural and urban areas for generalisability and accuracy of data.

Conclusion

The pattern of referral of inpatients to the psychiatry team was different in the present study setting where alcohol dependence syndrome was the most common psychiatric disorder followed by depression, adjustment disorder and delirium. Concordance was better for common psychiatric disorders like alcohol dependence syndrome, depression, anxiety and psychosis. But there was low concordance in diagnosing conversion disorders, insomnia, alcohol withdrawal syndrome and acute confusion state, whereas, the panic disorder remained undiagnosed. Thus this study suggests providing better attention to psychiatry speciality during undergraduate medical training to improve their clinical skills in diagnosing psychiatric disorders in order to provide holistic healthcare to the patients.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Department of Psychiatry, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu,India and the Institutional Review Board and Ethical Committee for allowing them to conduct the study.

References

1.
Al-Atram AA. Prevalence and patterns of psychiatric co-morbidity among adult medical inpatients: A Cross-sectional study. KUWAIT Med J. 2018;50:410-16.
2.
Hansen MS, Fink P, Frydenberg M, Oxhøj M, Søndergaard L, Munk-Jørgensen P, et al. Mental disorders among internal medical inpatients: Prevalence, detection, and treatment status. J Psychosom Res. 2001;50(4):199-204. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Silverstone PH. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in medical inpatients. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1996;184(1):43-51. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Grover S, Sahoo S, Aggarwal S, Dhiman S, Chakrabarti S, Avasthi A, et al. Reasons for referral and diagnostic concordance between physicians/surgeons and the consultation-liaison psychiatry team: An exploratory study from a tertiary care hospital in India. Indian J Psychiatry. 2017;59:170-5. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Avasthi A, Sharan P, Kulhara P, Malhotra S, Varma V. Psychiatric profiles in medical-surgical populations: Need for a focused approach to Consultation- Liaison Psychiatry in developing countries. Indian J Psychiatry. 1998;40:224-30.
6.
Maqbul Aljarad A, Dakhil Al Osaimi F, Al Huthail YR. Accuracy of psychiatric diagnoses in consultation liaison psychiatry. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2008;3(2):123-28. [crossref]
7.
Yamada K, Hosoda M, Nakashima S, Furuta K, Awata S. Psychiatric diagnosis in the elderly referred to a consultation-liaison psychiatry service in a general geriatric hospital in Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12(2):304-09. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
ICD-10 Version: 2010 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jun 3]. Available from: https://icd. who.int/browse10/2010/en#/V.
9.
Alhamad AM, Al-Sawaf MH, Osman AA, Ibrahim IS. Differential aspects of consultation-liaison psychiatry in a Saudi hospital. II: Knowledge and attitudes of physicians and patients. East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12(3):07.
10.
Chadda RK. Psychiatry in non-psychiatric setting-a comparative study of physicians and surgeons. J Indian Med Assoc. 2001;99(1):24, 26-27, 62.
11.
Alhamad AM, Al-Sawaf MH, Osman AA, Ibrahim IS. Differential aspects of consultation– liaison psychiatry in a Saudi hospital. I: Referral pattern and clinical indices. East Mediterr Health J. 2006;12(3):08.
12.
Manabendra M, Uttam M. Psychiatric comorbidity among referred inpatients and need for consultation-Liaison psychiatry. Delhi Psychiatry J. 2013;16:120-27.
13.
Liu SI, Lu RB, Lee MB. Non-psychiatric physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and behavior toward depression. J Formos Med Assoc. 2008;107(12):921-31. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Chadda RK, Shome S. Psychiatric aspects of clinical practice in general hospitals: A survey of non-psychiatric clinicians. Indian J Psychiatry. 1996;38(2):86-92.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55526.16809

Date of Submission: Feb 07, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Apr 05, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 18, 2022
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 11, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 02, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 14, 2022 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com