Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 239120

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : CC13 - CC18 Full Version

Short-term Heart Rate Variability to Evaluate Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/54981.16963
Priyanka Banerjee, Joyashree Banerjee, Suranjan Banerjee, Jayanta Bhattacharya, Bulbul Mukhopadhyay

1. Junior Resident, Department of Physiology, R.G.Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Associaate Professor, Department of Physiology, R.G.Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, R.G.Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Professor, Department of Physiology, R.G.Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Physiology, R.G.Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Joyashree Banerjee,
House No-C/8, Government Housing Estate, 82 Belgachia, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: banerjeedrjoyashree@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy (CAN) may be seen in patients of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). In many previous studies it was seen that there is reduced heart rate variability in DM patients. Reduced heart rate variability is earliest indicator for the CAN. In different earlier studies, it was found that results of Short-term Heart Rate Variability (HRV) analysis of five minutes is comparable to standard 24 hours HRV analysis. In DM patients CAN is mostly found to be associated with a longer duration of disease, but according to some studies CAN may be present in newly diagnosed diabetes patients also, but the percentage is lower.

Aim: To assess the short-term HRV profile as cardiovascular risks among newly diagnosed T2DM patients and to find the correlation of HRV parameters with duration of disease and biochemical parameters; Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) and Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPPG) for early detection and management of CAN.

Materials and Methods: The present study was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Physiology in collaboration with the Department of Endocrinology at R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, from September 2020 to August 2021 on 56 newly diagnosed T2DM (age group 30 to 64 years). Study subjects were grouped according to the Standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) (millisecond) value as cardiovascular risk factor. Group 1 was the low risk group, group 2 was the moderate risk group, group 3 was the high-risk group. HRV testing was done with Physiograph Polyrite-D instrument with bio-amplifiers, 4 channels and accessories (RMS latest software-Version 3.0.16) in Autonomic Function Research Laboratory to measure HRV parameters. After collecting data, analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM, SPSS) version 23.0 Unpaired student’s t-test, Chi-square test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, Pearson correlation test were performed and statistical significance of different parameters were evaluated. It was considered statistically significant when p-value <0.05.

Results: By assessing HRV parameters as cardiovascular risk factors among newly diagnosed T2DM patients the present study showed there was significantly (p-value=0.0065) high LF/HF ratio in males (1.70±1.19) than in females (0.99±0.69). The SDNN value was significantly highest in low cardiovascular risk group (137.29±25.49 ms) and lowest in high cardiovascular risk group (26.07±12.03 ms) (p-value=0.00001). Low Frequency and High Frequency Ratio (LF:HF ratio) was significantly more in age group of 51-60 years. Among all the patients, 34 (61%) patients had increased parasympathetic activity and 22 (39%) subjects had increased sympathetic activity. Female patients showed significantly more increased parasympathetic 24 (75%) activity than males 10 (41.7%). There was a significant association between SDNN values with the duration of disease (p-value=0.004).

Conclusion: The present study showed that cardiac autonomic neuropathy is present even at the time of diagnosis of newly diagnosed T2DM as there was sympathovagal imbalance. Female patients have more parasympathetic drive than males which indicates that females are more cardioprotective.

Keywords

Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, High frequency, Low frequency, Parasympathetic activity, Standard deviation of NN intervals, Sympathovagal imbalance

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) comprises of a group of metabolic disorders, resulting from defect in insulin action or insulin secretion. In the last two decades young adults of 30-39 years have become the fastest growing group for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Newly diagnosed diabetes was diagnosed according to the criteria of American Diabetes Association (1). Chronically elevated blood glucose level may be attributed to autonomic neuropathy (2). Diabetic neuropathy is the main cause of neuropathy in the world (3). Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy (CAN) is clinically considered as most important form of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Reduced heart rate variability is earliest indicator for the CAN (4). CAN can be presented as tachycardia at rest, exercise intolerance, orthostatic hypotension, asymptomatic ischaemia, myocardial infarction (5). CAN in DM might be associated with abnormalities in control of heart rate, decreased baroreceptor sensitivity and late manifestations of impairment of vascular dynamics (6). In DM patients CAN is mostly found to be associated with a longer duration of disease, but according to some studies CAN may be present in newly diagnosed diabetes patients also (7),(8),(9). CAN may be reported in newly diagnosed T2DM patients without any prior history of ischemic heart disease and it is associated with sudden death and increase in mortality rate in patients (10). It is found in most of the times that Diabetic Autonomic Neuropathy (DAN) affects the nerves in length dependent manner, so in diabetic patients it is commonly seen that the longest parasympathetic autonomic nerve, the vagus nerve is first effected.

Vagal involvement decreases parasympathetic tone and can be manifested as resting tachycardia. CAN may be presented as sympathetic denervation in later stage (11). The porges polyvagal theory describes the pathway of Heart Rate Variability (HRV). This theory describes the influence of vagal tone on heart rate variability (12). This suggests that standardised assessment of vagal tone is a very useful measure to assess cardiac health. Short-term HRV analysis was taken as five minutes recordings in earlier studies for early diagnosis of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (13),(14). Measurement of short-term HRV (5 minutes) is a clinical tool for screening and identifying patients at risk for cardiac mortality particularly in DM. Short-term HRV analysis (5 minutes) is very subject friendly (This technique was used in the present study). Study regarding short-term HRV to assess CAN in newly diagnosed T2DM is lacking, especially in eastern India. This study was conducted to find out whether sympathovagal imbalance is present in newly diagnosed T2DM patients as manifested by altered HRV which was measured by Short-term HRV analysis (5 minutes).

Study regarding short-term HRV to assess CAN in newly diagnosed T2DM is lacking, especially in eastern India. So, on this background the present study was conducted to find whether sympathovagal imbalance indicating CAN is present in newly diagnosed T2DM patients as manifested by altered HRV. The objectives of the present study were to assess the HRV parameters as cardiovascular risks among newly diagnosed T2DM and to find out any correlation of HRV parameters with duration of disease and biochemical parameters; Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) and Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPPG) in newly diagnosed T2DM.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 56 newly diagnosed T2DM patients, with age group of 30 and 64 years (both genders) attending diabetic clinic run by the Department of Endocrinology and screened in the Autonomic Function Research Laboratory in the Department of Physiology, R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, from September 2020 to August 2021. Ethical clearance has been obtained from The Institutional Ethics Committee of the R.G. Kar Medical College, prior to study. Informed written consent was taken from each patient.

Sample size calculation: Sample size has been calculated by using the following formula (15):-

Sample size (N)= (Z1-a/2)2×P×Q / D2

Where,
(Z1-a/2)= Standard normal variation (At 2SD of variation and at 95% confidence level i.e, Z1-a/2=1.96
P= Prevalence of CAN in newly diagnosed T2DM 15.3% (16);
Q=100-P;
D=absolute error or precision (taken as 7%)

So sample size N=101.59. Taking into consideration of nonresponsive rate of 15% final sample size will be 117. But due the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic situation the present study was unable to include 117 study subjects and was able to include only 56 study subjects.

Inclusion criteria: Patients of both genders, newly diagnosed T2DM patients, age between to 30 to 64 years, patients willing to take part in the study. Newly diagnosed diabetes was diagnosed according to the criteria of American Diabetes Association (1) were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who had already developed symptoms of autonomic neuropathy, patients with bowel and bladder disturbances, impotence (previously diagnosed, taken from the history sheet), postural hypotension, hypertension, hyperthyroid or hypothyroid patients, underlying cardiovascular illness like ischemic heart disease, rheumatic heart disease, arrhythmia, cardiac failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), asthma, sputum positive pulmonary tuberculosis, psychiatric diseases, recent surgery or trauma, patients on drugs known to affect autonomic functions like beta-blockers, diuretics, vasodilators, antiarrhythmics. Any hereditary history of T2DM was not taken in consideration.

Study subjects were grouped according to the Standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) (millisecond) value as cardiovascular risk factor.

• Group-1 was the low risk group
• Group-2 was the moderate risk group
• Group-3 was the high-risk group

Study Parameters

Time domain: Time domain parameters of HRV analysis were taken like Standard deviation of RR intervals (SDRR), Standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN), Standard deviation of the average NN Intervals (SDANN).

Time domain analysis measures the heart rate changes overtime or the intervals between Successive normal cardiac cycles. A continuous Electrocardiogram (ECG) recording was obtained and each QRS complex (QRS complex is a group of waves seen on an electrocardiogram, representing ventricular depolarisation) was detected and the normal RR intervals due to instantaneous heart rate then determined. Normal sinus rhythm intervals or NN intervals obtained after eliminating artifacts like abnormal beats, ectopic beats, omitted heart beats and noise from machine. Standard Deviation (SD) of RR or NN intervals is generally considered to reflect the day-night changes of heart rate variability. SDNN is an index of heart rate variability and reflects circadian rhythms and long-term components which are responsible for variability of heart rate within the period of recording of the ECG.

Frequency domain: Frequency domain parameters of HRV analysis were Low Frequency (LF), High Frequency (HF), LF/HF ratio.

Frequency domain (power spectral density) describes periodic oscillations of the heart rate signal. The periodic oscillation of hearts sinus rhythm contains different frequencies with different amplitudes. One of the simple and rapid method to analyse the frequency domain or spectral density of heart rate variability is by Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) method which is characterised by discrete peaks for the several frequency components of hearts sinus rhythm and individual R-R intervals stored in the computer are transformed into bands with different spectral frequencies (17). The power spectrum consist of frequency band ranging from 0 to 0.5 Hz and can be classified into four bands (17). Ultra Low Frequency (ULF), Very Low Frequency (VLF), Low Frequency (LF), High Frequency (HF).

Data Collection

Then each patient underwent history taking and physical examination. FBS and PPBS values were recorded from the history sheet of the study subjects which were available for each study subjects. The Waist Circumference (WC) was measured at the midpoint between the lower margin of the last palpable ribs and the top of the iliac crest, and Hip Circumference (HC) was measured around the widest portion of the buttocks, with the tape parallel to the floor using a non-elastic tape (18). The Waist Hip Ratio (WHR) was obtained by dividing the WC by the HC using the same units of measurements for both (18).

The conditions required for the HRV test were strictly maintained as per standard protocol; prior to the test for 12 hours atleast, the subject should not take tea, coffee, food, any sedative or any drug affecting central nervous system (17). The subjects were advised to wear loose clothing, no metallic objects, have a sound sleep the night before the test, to evacuate bladder before doing the test and to avoid smoking in preceding 24 hours. The test procedures were performed in the morning as far as practicable and as standard guidelines. Autonomic function testing was done with Physiograph Polyrite-D instrument with bio-amplifiers, 4 channels and accessories (RMS latest software-Version 3.0.16) in Autonomic Function Research Laboratory Department of Physiology R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital. The room temperature of the laboratory was maintained between 18°C and 25°C. The lighting of room was maintained as minimum as possible. The subjects were asked to take rest in supine position for 15 minutes prior to the study.

Procedure

After proper counselling and adequate rest patients were asked to maintain following points during examination: not to sleep; no vigorous movements; no emotional over excitations; not to cough, sneeze or any other activities, to keep calm during examination. Both upper limbs were exposed up to elbows and the left lower limb was exposed up to knee. The exposed parts of limbs were properly cleaned with alcohol swab. All the clamp type limb electrodes (right hand, left hand and left foot) were attached using electoconductive jelly. Hand electrodes were placed around wrists and foot electrode was placed just above the ankle of left foot. All the electrodes were connected to bio-amplifier of the Physiograph polyrite-D via a transducer mechanism. The resting Heart Rate is obtained from the Polyrite-D. Frequency domain (spectral) and time domain analysis of Short-term (5 minutes) HRV was recorded. There was no single HRV number. To attain in depth reliability of HRV test relative and absolute reliability of the most common HRV parameters such as SDNN and LF/HF ratio are considered. European Society of Cardiology and North American Society of Pacing constituted task force to develop appropriate standards and proposals of HRV measurements (17). But as a general rule the present study takes normal range of HRV values according to upper and lower 95% confidence limit. SDNN value over 100 ms can be considered normal, SDNN value less than 50 ms is considered high-risk, and a SDNN between 50 to 100 ms can indicate moderate risk, they are related to cardiovascular risks (19). LF-HF ratio less than 1 indicates good cardiovascular health (20).

Statistical Analysis

After collection of data, statistical analysis was done by the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Unpaired student’s t-test, Chi-square test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, Pearson correlation test were performed and statistical significance of different parameters were evaluated. It was considered statistically significant when p-value <0.05.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the study subjects were considered, female patients had more waist circumference than males, but it was statistically insignificant (p-value=0.1659). In the present study, male patients had more waist hip ratio than females, and it was very significant (p-value=0.0001) (Table/Fig 1). Mean hip circumference was significantly more in females (101.38±6.54 cm) than in males (95.71±7.31 cm) (p-value=0.0035). Mean height was more in males (162.88±4.64 cm) than females (153.88±5.89 cm) (p-value=0.0001). The mean of waist height ratio was significantly more in females than in males (p-value=0.0001).There were no significant difference of duration of diabetes mellitus FPG (p-value=0.099), PPPG (p-value0.69) between males and females.

More SDNN value in male (45.21±28.94 ms) than female (43.42±46.47 ms), but that change was not significant (p-value=0.8692). There was significantly (p-value=0.0065) high LF/HF ratio in males (1.70±1.19) than in females (0.99±0.69) (Table/Fig 2).

(Table/Fig 3) showed the distribution of study subjects according to the SDNN (ms) value as cardiovascular risk factor, there were significantly different SDNN values in three cardiovascular risk groups and the change was statisticallyl (p-value=0.0001) significant. The mean of SDNN value 137.29±25.49 ms, was highest in group 1. Group 3 showed lowest mean SDNN value, 26.07±12.03. The result showed that 10.71% cases in group 1, 10.71% in group 2 and group 3 which was the high-risk group had 78.5% of the study subjects.

(Table/Fig 4) showed that mean of LF:HF ratio (1.97), was maximum in age group of 51-60 years. LF:HF ratio (0.99) was minimum in age group of 30-40 years (p-value=0.023). Mean of SDNN (ms) changes in different age groups were not statistically significant (p-value=0.610).

In the present study (Table/Fig 5) showed that 34 (61%) patients had parasympathetic overdrive and 22 (9%) subjects had sympathetic drive. In this study, the subjects significantly more male patients had sympathetic drive (n=14, 58.33%) than female patients (n=8, 25%). Female (n=24, 75%) patients showed significantly more parasympathetic drive than males (n=10, 41.7%). The results are statistically significant (p-value <0.05).

From (Table/Fig 6) we found that SDNN had a negative association with duration of diseases (r=-0.38) and the correlation was statistically significant (p=0.004). SDNN shows positive association with FPG (mg/dL) (r-value=+0.001) and PPPG (mg/dL) (r=+0.02), but their correlation was not significant (p-value=0.903). (Table/Fig 7) also shows strong negative correlation of SDNN with duration of diabetes. From (Table/Fig 6) we also found that LF/HF ratio had statistically significant positive association with duration of disease but no association with Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) and Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPPG). (Table/Fig 8) also showed strong association of LF/HF ratio with duration of disease.

Discussion

Recently, short-term HRV has been proposed as the most sensitive indicator of autonomic function, and CAN can be manifested as reduced HRV (21),(22). Malik M et al., found in a study that HRV indices mirror the sympathetic and parasympathetic activities in a subject (17). In a previous study of Welborn TA et al., waist hip ratio was found to be a better indicator than waist circumference in evaluation of obesity and associated cardiovascular risk factors (23). Waist hip ratio can indicate severity of CAN (24). The present study showed that waist hip ratio is more in male that female which signified that male patients were at higher cardiovascular risk. The present study showed that waist-height ratio was more in females than males which indicates that female patients were more obese than males. Though studies suggested that waist-height ratio is a new parameter and more research is needed to confirm it is as a valid measure to evaluate cardiovascular risk prediction (25).

In the present study, the and frequency domains for evaluation of CAN were considered, as they are most widely used parameters. Previous study of Kuehl M et al., discussed that early diagnosis of CAN, using spectral analysis of heart rate variability or scintigraphic imaging techniques, might enable identification of patients at highest risk for the development of clinical CAN (26). In the present study mean of SDNN was slightly higher in males than females, but p-value was non significant (p-value=0.8692). Whereas, LF/HF ratio in males were significantly higher than females. In a short-term HRV of 5 minutes study LF/HF ratio is a better indicator of sympathovagal balance than SDNN value (17). Pop-Busui R et al., in their study found that diabetes autonomic neuropathy affects the nerves mostly in length dependent manner and the longest parasympathetic autonomic nerve, the vagus nerve affects first, though CAN causes sympathetic denervation also (11). The present study found sympathovagal imbalance in study subjects which was indicated by high LF:HF ratio in males where male patients showed more sympathetic overdrive which is an indication of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (17) and female patients showed more parasympathetic overdrive. The present study found male patients had more sympathetic overdrive than females but Zoppini G et al., found that prevalence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes cases were not different between males and females (27). The present study showed that male subjects had more LF/HF ratio than female subjects of newly diagnosed T2DM. Hogarth A et al., also showed that male subjects had more LF/HF ratio than female among T2DM patients (28).

The present study has shown that out of 56 patients, 22 (39%) patients expressed sympathetic overactivity. Among all the male patients 58% (14 out of 24) males have shown significantly more sympathetic overactivity whereas 75% female patients (24 out of 32) among the all female patients showed significantly more parasympathetic overactivity. So, male patients clearly suppressed the general trend of parasympathic overactivity and showed gross deviation from general trend and inclined towards sympathetic overactivity and females were more cardioprotective than males. This finding of sympathetic overdrive more in males can be explained by different causative factors suggested by a study by Morrison SF et al., and another study by Grassi G et al., and these study showed that cardiovascular and metabolic functions are modulated by sympathetic mechanism and increased adrenergic drive is a basis of several pathologic states in metabolic syndrome (29),(30). In this socio economic strata daily struggle of existence is more in males than females which causes more stress in males (31). Stress causes dysregulation of adrenocortical and sexual steroids, but it was not considered during history taking in the present study. In previous study it was found that stress causes release of more cortisol which impairs insulin secretion and shows diabetogenic effect (32). Stress is major risk factor for developing sympathovagal imbalance. Fenollar-Cortés J et al., in a study during COVID-19 pandemic found that women group coped up with negative emotions like stress due to confinement in pandemic situation, more than males over time (33). In a previous study of Sloan RP et al., HRV variables changed with stress which showed low parasympathetic activity and an increase in LF/HF ratio (34). So the findings of the present study which showed increase in LF/HF ratio indicating low parasympathetic activity in males than the females may be due to stress.

Android obesity or central obesity in males i.e., the distribution of human adipose tissue around the trunk and upper body, in areas of abdomen, chest, shoulder and nape of the neck are associated with increased proinflammatory state with more liberation of adipokines, TNF-alpha and IL-6 men are found to have greater visceral and hepatic adipose tissue, show more insulin resistance and do not have cardioprotective hormone like oestrogen unlike women (35). In a previous study by Varlamov O et al., it was found that there are sex differences in cardiometabolic profile and women is at lower risk, due to mainly difference in sex steroids (36). The present study finding was similar with the previous study and showed vagal dominance in female patients. Endorphins act on the opioid receptors in the brains, they reduce stress and pain, also boost up pleasure and has calming effect (37). Earlier studies suggest that oestrogen may have different cardioprotective roles in females. Oestrogen acts as a vasodilator, can protect from endothelial dysfunction and thus reduces vascular diseases (38). Specific action of oestrogen on Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF) gene is yet undetermined, It may so happen that oestrogen might reduce the synthesis and release of CRF (39). In effect less stress will be perceived by females than males. Aldosterone is fibrotic and proinflammatory. Oestrogen reduces aldosterone synthesis, hence minimises the chance of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality by preventing unwanted cardiac remodelling (40). Evidence suggests that oestrogen may enhance baroreceptor sensitivity and by this fine tuning of baroreceptors oestrogen may reduce sympathetic overdrive to a large extent (41).

The present study subjects were distributed to different cardiovascular risk groups according to SDNN value and showed most of the subjects were high-risk patients so far SDNN value was concerned. A previous study showed that in the HR analysis, statistically significant differences were found in the time domain, specifically on short-term values such as standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN) (42).

The present study showed that there was reduced HRV with advancement of age which was statistically also significant (p-value=0.023). One previous study, showed that the variables SDNN (p-value=0.04), RMSSD (p-value=0.007), pNN50 (p-value=0.004) and triangular index (p-value=0.01) were significantly lower in the older age group indicating that this group had lower parasympathetic activity (43). The findings can be explained as homeostenosis is a problem of aging (44). Aging can lead to increased vulnerability to different diseases (45). The oxidative stress with aging process can also associated with cardiovascular risks (27),(43).

In the present study, FFG showed positive correlation and PPPG also showed positive correlation with LF/HF ratio, results were statistically non significant. Any statistically significant association between SDNN value with biochemical parameters like fasting plasma glucose and postprandial plasma glucose was not found. Dhumad MM et al., found poor glycaemic control associated with CAN (46). This finding has made us thought that degree of glucotoxicity is less severe in new onset DM patients. In the present study Pearson correlation test showed that there was negative correlation between SDNN and duration of disease of diabetes mellitus, and it was found to be statistically significant (Table/Fig 6). The previous study showed that duration of diabetes emerged as a significant independent factor for the development of CAN among T2DM patients (27).

However what is more important is that CAN is present even at the time of diagnosis of newly diagnosed T2DM. So CAN screening should be routinely done in all patients even if T2DM is newly diagnosed.

Limitation(s)

• Sample size was less, due to COVID-19 pandemic situation authors cannot attend the required sample size.
• It was a cross-sectional study which did not enable us to establish a causality relationship.
• The lack of a non diabetic control group for comparison was another limitation.
• The present study has not grouped the subjects based on BMI.
• In developing countries majority of people with T2DM between 45-64 years age, thus the females from 30 to 64 years were included.
• As the present study included both males and females in the age groups 30 to 64 years so menstruation and postmenopausal woman were confounding factor.
• All patients included in the study diagnosed with newly diagnosed T2DM were not on similar drug.

Conclusion

The present study clearly points towards the major difference between male and female newly diagnosed type2 diabetic patient so far as sympathovagal balance is concerned. Female patients have more parasympathetic overdrive than males and cardiac autonomic neuropathy is present even at the time of diagnosis of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. To prevent future complications from cardiac autonomic neuropathy authors suggest regular aerobic exercise which improves vagal tone, and reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, HRV monitoring as a routine test from the time of diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Further prospective studies with larger sample size are required to confirm the association between study outcomes and other variables. Evaluation of cardiac autonomic neuropathy by HRV test on newly diagnosed subjects on similar drug, with larger sample size, excluding postmenopausal women and evaluating the subjects considering HBA1c as a good indicator among different groups based on BMI should be further studied.

References

1.
American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(suppl1):S55-S60. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-S055. PMID: 18165338. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Vinik A, Maser R, Mitchell B, Freeman R. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1553-79. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.5.1553. PMID: 12716821. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Pop-Busui R, Boultan AJM, Feldman EL, Bril V, Freeman R, Malik RA, et al. Diabetic neuropathy: A position statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:136-54. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2042. PMID: 27999003. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Maser R, Lenhard M, DeCherney G. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy: The clinical significance of its determination. Endocrinologist. 2000;10:27-33. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00019616-200010010-00006. [crossref]
5.
Vinik AL, Erbas T. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;117:279-94. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53491-0.00022-5. PMID: 24095132. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Poanta L, Porojan M, Dumitrascu DL. Heart rate variability and diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 2011;48(3):191-96. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-011-0256-2. PMID: 21298295. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Dimitropoulos G, Tahrani AA, Stevens MJ. Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2014;5(1):17-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v5.i1.17. PMID: 24567799. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Vinik AI, Erbas T, Casellini CM. Diabetic cardiac autonomic neuropathy, inflammation and cardiovascular disease. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4(1):04-18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12042. PMID: 23550085. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Balcioğlu AS, Müderrisoğlu H. Diabetes and cardiac autonomic neuropathy: Clinical manifestations, cardiovascular consequences, diagnosis and treatment. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(2):434-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Jyotsna VP, Sahoo A, Sreenivas V, Deepak KK. Prevalence and pattern of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in newly detected type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res ClinPract. 2009;83(1):83-88. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2008.09.054. PMID: 19042051. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Pop-Busui R. Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetes: A clinical perspective. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(2):434-41. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1294. PMID: 20103559. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Porges SW. The polyvagal perspective. Biological Psycology. 2007;74(2):116-43. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho. 2006.06.009. PMID: 17049418. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Force T. Heart rate variability guidelines: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:354-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014868. [crossref]
14.
Deepak A, Aithal K, Khode VH, Nallulwar SC. Short term heart rate variability for early assessment of autonomic neuropthy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A comparative cross sectional study. Ann Nigerian Med. 2014;8:04-07. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0331-3131.141021. [crossref]
15.
Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121-26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0331-3131.141021. PMID: 24049221. [crossref]
16.
Ziegler D, Voss A, Rathmann W. Increased prevalence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction at different degrees of glucose intolerance in the general population: the KORA S4 survey. Diabetologia. 2015;58:1118-28. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-015-3534-7. PMID: 25724570. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Malik M, Bigger JT, Camm AJ, Kleiger RE, Malliani A, Moss AJ, et al. Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J. 1996;17(3):354-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014868. [crossref]
18.
Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio, Report of a WHO Expert Consultation" (PDF). World Health Organization. 8-11 December 2008. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
19.
Corrales MM, Torres B de la C, Esquivel AG, Salazar MAG, Naranjo Orellana J. Normal values of heart rate variability at rest in a young, healthy and active Mexican population. Health. 2012;04(07):377-85. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2012.47060. [crossref]
20.
Sztazel J. Heart rate variability: A non invasive electrocardiographic method to measure the autonomic nervous system. Swiss Med Wkly. 2004;134(35-36)514-22.
21.
Mirza M. A comparative study of Heart Rate Variability in diabetic subjects and normal subjects. Int J Biol Adv Res. 2012;3(8):640-44. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v3i8.542. [crossref]
22.
Metelka R. HEART rate variability-current diagnosis of the cardiac autonomic neuropathy. A review. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2014;158(3):327-38. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2014.025. PMID: 25004914. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Welborn TA, Dhaliwal SS, Bennett SA. Waist-hip ratio is the dominant risk factor predicting cardiovascular death in Australia. Med J Aust. 2003;179(11-12):580-85. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05704.x. PMID: 14636121. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Ko SH, Song KH, Park SA, Kim SR, Cha BY, Son HY, et al. Cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction predicts acute ischaemic stroke in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 7-year follow-up study. Diabet Med. 2008;25(10):1171-77. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02567.x. PMID: 19046195. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Browning LM, Hsieh SD, Ashwell M. A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0·5 could be a suitable global boundary value. Nutr Res Rev. 2010;23(2):247-69. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422410000144. PMID: 20819243. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Kuehl M, Stevens MJ. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathies as complications of diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8(7):405-16. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2012.21. PMID: 22371159. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Zoppini G, Cacciatori V, Raimondo D, Gemma M, Trombetta M, Dauriz M, et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: The verona newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes study (VNDS). Diabetes Care. 2015;38(8):1487-93. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0081. PMID: 26068862. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Hogarth A, Mackintosh A, Mary D. The effect of gender on the sympathetic nerve hyperactivity of essential hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2006;21(3):239-45. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1002132. PMID: 17167522. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Morrison SF. Central pathway controlling brown adipose tissue thermogenesis. News Physiol Sci. 2004;19:67-74. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1152/nips.01502.2003. PMID: 15016906. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Grassi G. Sympathetic overdrive and cardiovascular risk in the metabolic syndrome. Hypertens Res [Internet]. 2006;29(11):839-47. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1291/hypres.29.839. PMID: 17345783. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Matud M. Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and Individual Differences. 2004;37(7):1401-15. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.010. [crossref]
32.
Adam T, Hasson R, Ventura E, Toledo-Corral C, Le K, Mahurkar S, et al. Cortisol is negatively associated with insulin sensitivity in overweight latino youth. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(10):4729-35. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-0322. PMID: 20660036. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Fenollar-Cortés J, Jiménez Ó, Ruiz-García A, Resurrección D. Gender differences in psychological impact of the confinement during the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain: A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682860. PMID: 34248784. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Iacobellis G, Malavazos A. Pericardial adipose tissue, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease risk factors: The jackson heart study: Comment on Liu et al., Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):e127-e127. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-0904. PMID: 20805269. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Moran A, Jacobs D, Steinberger J, Steffen L, Pankow J, Hong C, et al. Changes in Insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk during adolescence: Establishment of differential risk in males and females. Circulation. 2008;117(18):2361-68. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.704569. PMID: 18427135. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Varlamov O, Bethea CL, Roberts CT Jr. Sex-specific differences in lipid and glucose metabolism. Front Endocrinol. 2014;5:241. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2014.00241. PMID: 25646091. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Grisel J, Bartels J, Allen S, Turgeon V. Influence of β-Endorphin on anxious behavior in mice: Interaction with EtOH. Psychopharmacology. 2008;200(1):105-15. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-008-1161-4. PMID: 18604523. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Gilligan DM, Badar DM, Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO. Acute vascular effects of estrogen in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1994;90(2):786-91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.90.2.786. PMID: 8044949. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Ogura E, Kageyama K, Hanada K, Kasckow J, Suda T. Effects of estradiol on regulation of corticotropin-releasing factor gene and interleukin-6 production via estrogen receptor type β in hypothalamic 4B cells. Peptides. 2008;29(3):456-64. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peptides.2007.11.007. PMID: 18160129. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Macova M, Armando I, Zhou J, Baiardi G, Tyurmin D, Larrayoz-Roldan IM, et al. Estrogen reduces aldosterone, upregulates adrenal angiotensin II AT2 receptors and normalizes adrenomedullary Fra-2 in ovariectomized rats. Neuroendocrinology. 2008;88(4):276-86. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000150977. PMID: 18679017. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Mohamed MK, El-Mas MM, Abdel-Rahman AA. Estrogen enhancement of baroreflex sensitivity is centrally mediated. Am J Physiol. 1999;276(4):R1030-37. Doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.276.4.R1030. PMID: 10198382. [crossref] [PubMed]
42.
Michel-Chávez A, Estañol B, Gien-López JA, Robles-Cabrera A, Huitrado-Duarte ME, Moreno-Morales R, et al. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure variability on recently diagnosed diabetics. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015;105(3):276-84. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150073. PMID: 26176187. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Silva-E-Oliveira J, Amélio PM, Abranches ILL, Damasceno DD, Furtado F. Heart rate variability based on risk stratification for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017;15(2):141-47. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082017ao3888. PMID: 28767910. [crossref] [PubMed]
44.
Cowdry EV. Problems of ageing: Biological and medical aspects, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1942.
45.
Kennedy BK, Berger SL, Brunet A, Campisi J, Cuervo AM, Epel ES, et al. Geroscience: Linking aging to chronic disease. Cell. 2014;159(4):709-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.039. PMID: 25417146. [crossref] [PubMed]
46.
Dhumad MM, Hamdan FB, Khudhair MS, AI-Matubsi HY. Correlation of staging and risk factors with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):3576. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-80962-w. PMID: 33574349. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/54981.16963

Date of Submission: Feb 01, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 31, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jul 05, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 04, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 02, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 22, 2022 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com