Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 270503

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : OC30 - OC33 Full Version

Correlation of Suppression of Tumourigenicity 2 with hsCRP, NT-proBNP and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients with Myocardial Infarction


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/58111.16924
Mainuddin Khan, Arun Bahulikar, Ajit Tambolkar, Divya Patel, Deepak Sadashiv Phalgune

1. Senior Resident, Department of of Medicine, Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Consultant and Head,, Department of of Medicine, Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Consultant Physician, Department of of Medicine, Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 4. Head, Department of of Pathology, Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 5. Research Consultant, Department of of Research, Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Deepak Sadashiv Phalgune,
18/27, Bharat Kunj-1, Lane No-4, Laxmi Bungalow, Erandawane, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: dphalgune@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Soluble Suppression of Tumourigenicity 2 (sST2) represents a clinically relevant biomarker and has predictive evidence in acute Myocardial Infarction (MI) and predicts cardiovascular death and risk of heart failure development in these patients. The data about the correlation of sST2, N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)in the Indian population is lacking.

Aim: To find a correlation of ST2 level at the time of admission with NT-proBNP, hsCRP and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) in patients with MI, and the association of ST2 levels with mortality.

Materials and Methods: This longitudinal observational study was conducted at Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India, between June 2018 and August 2019, among 75 myocardial infarction patients above 18 years of age. ST2, NT-proBNP and hsCRP levels were checked within 6 hour of hospitalisation. The primary outcome measures were to study the correlation of ST2 levels at the time of admission with hsCRP, NT-proBNP and LVEF. The secondary outcome measures were to study the association of ST2 levels with in-hospital and one-month mortality. The medians of continuous variables of two groups and three groups were-tested using the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis H test respectively. The correlation analysis was performed using Spearman’s method.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 57.8±7.2 years. The mortality rate was 60% (12/75). ST2 levels showed a statistically significant positive correlation with NT-proBNP (r =0.703, p-value=0.001) and hsCRP (r=0.873, p-value=0.001), whereas, ST2 levels showed a negative correlation with LVEF (r=- 0.711, p-value=0.001) in MI patients. The median ST2 levels were significantly higher in-hospital (215.3 ng/dL vs 94 ng/dL) and one month (219.5 ng/dL vs 92.0 ng/dL) mortality as compared to survived MI patients.

Conclusion: ST2 levels showed a statistically significant positive correlation with NT-proBNP and hsCRP and were associated with in-hospital and one month mortality in MI patients.

Keywords

Association, High-sensitivity c-reactive protein, Left ventricular ejection fraction, Mortality, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide

High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP), a marker of inflammation, is well-established for risk stratification in Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (1). Suppression of tumourigenicity 2 (ST2) is emerging as a powerful and reliable prognostic biomarker in cardiology. Its soluble form (sST2) in the blood signifies pathological cardiac remodelling (2),(3). The interleukin-1 receptor family has numerous members. In 1989, one member of the family, ST2, was recognized as an orphan receptor (4). ST2 has a role in the inflammatory processes, mainlyin relation to mast cells, type 2 CD4+ T-helper cells, and the production of Th2-associated cytokines (5).

Clinical and investigational explanations led to the association of ST2 with disease entities such as asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, rheumatoid arthritis, collagen vascular diseases and septic shock (6),(7),(8),(9),(10). The discovery of Interleukin-33 (IL-33) as an ST2 ligand provided novel understandings of ST2 signalling (11). IL-33 is obviously a possible mediator of various inflammatory diseases (12). IL-33 has now also been shown to contribute in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Also, the IL-33/ST2 system probably plays a part in the development of atherosclerotic vascular disease (13). Beyond its role as a therapeutic target, the sST2 has also emerged as a biomarker for disease. For example, serum levels of ST2 are raised in patients with acute exacerbations of bronchial asthma (6), and in emergency-room patients presenting with shortness of breath, serum levels of ST2 can discriminate between Heart Failure (HF) and non-cardiovascular aetiologies (14). Therefore, ST2 signifies a promising biomarker for cardiac injury.

The elevations of ST2 levels in the blood are observed in patients after Myocardial Infarction (MI). The elevated ST2 levels in patients are associated with a higher risk of death on short and long-term follow-up (14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19). The prognostic value of ST2 seems to be additive to natriuretic peptides among patients with MI (14),(16),(17),(18),(20). A previous general population research has shown that sST2 were elevated in blacks and predict increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (21). In patients with acute and chronic HF, sST2 levels are strongly predictive of death, and Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF), and contribute pertinent evidence in addition to other predictors and biomarkers, as natriuretic peptides or troponins. sST2 also retains prognostic evidence in acute MI and predicts cardiovascular mortality and risk of HF development in these patients. sST2 might be a promising tool to stratify the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with low LVEF. Thus, sST2 signifies a biomarker that reflects the pathophysiological processes, and predicts about several cardiovascular diseases, particularly in patients with HF (22).

The data on the utility of ST2 in the Indian population are lacking. Also, there are no data about the correlation of ST2, N-Terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) and hsCRP in the Indian population. The aim of the present study was to find the correlation of ST2 level at the time of admission with NT-proBNP, hsCRP and LVEF in patients with MI, and the association of ST2 level with mortality.

Material and Methods

This longitudinal observational study was conducted between June 2018 and August 2019. After approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (Letter No. RECH/EC/2018-19/183), written informed consent was obtained from all the patients prior to enrolment explaining the risks and benefits of the procedure.

Inclusion criteria: Patients above 18 years of age who had only fresh MI presented within 12 hour of symptom onset were included.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who had liver cirrhosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchitis, asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic heart failure due to rheumatic valvular heart diseases, collagen vascular diseases, rheumatoid arthritis and sepsis were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Barbarash O et al., reported a significant correlation between NT-proBNP and ST2 levels (r-value=0.50, p-value=0.001) (23). The sample size was calculated by formula:

N=[(Zα+Zβ)/C]2 + 3

where C=0.5 * ln[(1+r)/(1-r)] (24)

Zα was considered at 1% type 1 error (2.58)

Zβ the standard normal deviate for β power 90 % at type II error (1.28).

Total sample size of 52 was calculated by above method. In the present study, 75 patients were included to validate the results.

Myocardial infarction: MI was defined as detection of rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers (preferably cardiac troponin I value >99th percentile of upper reference limit) plus atleast one of the symptoms of ischaemia (chest pain, irregular heart rate, malaise), new or presumed new significant ST-segment and T wave changes or new Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB), development of pathological Q waves on Electrocardiogram (ECG), imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality and identification of intracoronary thrombus by angiography (25).

Data collection: Detailed clinical history and examination findings were noted for each patient. The ECG changes were noted such as ST elevation/depression, T wave inversion or Q waves and new LBBB. A 2D-ECHO was done to determine LVEF. Haemogram, serum urea, serum creatinine, serum electrolytes, blood sugar levels along with chest X-ray were done on admission. ST2, NT-proBNP, hsCRP and Troponin I levels were checked within 6 hours of hospitalisation.

• ST2 was checked by Sandwich monoclonal lateral flow immunoassay, on Aspect Reader (cut-off value 35 ng/dL);
• High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured by Nephelometry method on BN ProSpec;
• NT-proBNP was measured by Enzyme-linked Fluorescent Assay, on VIDAS and
• Troponin-I was measured by Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay method on ARCHITECT.
• The duration of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality and status on discharge were recorded for each patient. At one month follow-up, mortality, if any was noted.
• The primary outcome measures were to study the correlation of ST2 with hsCRP, NT-proBNP levels and LVEF at the time of admission in MI patients. The secondary outcome measures were to study the association of ST2 levels with in-hospital mortality and mortality on one month follow-up.

Statistical Analysis

Data collected were entered in Excel 2007 and analysis of data was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows, Version 20.0 from IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA. The data on categorical variables are shown as n (% of cases). The parametric data on continuous variables are presented as mean and Standard Deviation (SD), whereas non-parametric data are presented as median and Interquartile Range (IQR). The intergroup comparison of medians of continuous variables was done using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H test for two groups and three groups respectively. The correlation analysis was performed using Spearman’s method. The confidence limit for significance was fixed at a 95% level with a p-value <0.05.

Results

The demographic and clinical characteristics are depicted in (Table/Fig 1). The mean ± SD of the age of the study population was 57.8±7.2 years. The majority (49,65.3%) of the population was comprised of males. The median ST2 level on admission was 109.6 ng/dL.

There was a statistically significant positive correlation between ST2 and NT-ProBNP levels and ST2 and hsCRP levels. ST2levels on admission showed a statistically significant negative correlation with LVEF. The lower LVEF on admission was significantly associated with the higher ST2 levels and vice-versa (Table/Fig 2). The median ST2 levels were significantly higher in patients who died in hospital (in-hospital mortality) as compared to survived patients. The median ST2 levels did not differ significantly according to the duration of hospital stay. The median ST2 levels were significantly lower in patients who had LVEF ≥50%.The median ST2 levels were significantly higher in patients who died as compared survived patients at one month follow-up (Table/Fig 3).

Discussion

There was a statistically significant positive correlation between ST2 and NT-ProBNP levels and hsCRP levels in patients on admission of MI. ST2 levels on admission showed a statistically significant negative correlation with LVEF in patients of MI. The median ST2 levels were significantly higher in patients who died (in-hospital deaths and at one month follow-up) as compared to survived patients. This is the first Indian study that has compared well established cardiac biomarkers, NT-proBNP and hsCRP with a novel biomarker ST2.

Various studies have reported higher levels of ST2 in MI. In studies by Sabatine MS et al., Barbarash O et al., Jenkins W et al., and Dhillon OS et al., median levels of ST2 levels were 80 ng/dL, 57 ng/dL, 70.0 ng/dL and 78.2. ng/dL respectively which was much higher than the baseline levels and it was associated with the poor outcome (20),(23),(26),(27). In the present study, the median ST2 level in the MI patients was 117.00 ng/dL much higher than reported previously. This was likely due to more severely ill patients in the present study.

The positive correlation of ST2 and NT-proBNP has been reported by Shimpo M et al., and Sabatine MS et al., for ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (15),(20). Sabatine MS et al., and Barbarash O et al., reported that the correlation between baseline ST2 levels and NT-proBNP was slight (r-value=0.14, p-value <0.001) and (r-value =0.50, p-value=0.001) respectively (20),(23). O’Donoghue ML et al., reported a positive correlation (r=0.34) between ST2 and NT proBNP (28). The present study substantiated these findings. Studies directly correlating ST2 and hsCRP in MI are lacking. O’Donoghue ML et al., and Wang TJ et al., in the Framingham offspring study and using the multimarker model in MI had reported a positive correlation of ST2 and hsCRP (28),(29).

Kohli P et al., reported that in patients with LVEF, higher ST2 concentration was weakly but significantly associated with lower ejection fraction (r-value=0.12, p-value=0.0001) (30). In the present study, ST2 level was inversely related (r-value=-0.711) to LVEF in MI patients. This is likely due to more damaged and poorly functioning myocardium in STEMI cases with lower LVEF.

Sabatine MS et al., reported that the baseline ST2 level was significantly higher in patients who suffered cardiovascular death (20). Jenkins W et al., reported that persons with elevated sST2 had a 2.4-fold increased risk of death {Hazards ratio (HR) 2.38; 95% CI 1.46-3.86; p-value=0.005} and a 2.1-fold increased risk of Heart Failure (HF) (HR 2.11; 95% CI 1.18-3.76; p-value=0.01) (26). Barbarash O et al., reported that median sST2 (ng/mL) of 35.5 and 70.0 had favourable and unfavourable outcome respectively after MI (23).

Dhillon OS et al., reported that ST2 independently predicts 30-day mortality (HR: 4.43, p-value=0.02) (27). Kohli P et al., reported that high ST2 was associated with increased risk for Cardiovascular Death (CVD)/HF at 30 days (6.6% vs 1.6%, p-value=0.0001) and 1 year (12.2% vs 5.2%, p-value=0.0001) (30). Wang TJ et al., reported that the concentrations of sST2, predict the future risk of death {HR=1.32 (1.20-1.46)} (29). O’Donoghue ML et al., reported that after adjustment for clinical variables and using a dichotomous cut point, ST2 was significantly associated with the higher odds CVD or HF (Odds ratio adj, 2.87; 1.61-5.12) (28). In the present study, the median ST2 levels were significantly higher in patients who died (in-hospital deaths and at one month follow-up) as compared to survived patients.

The present study showed that high levels of ST2 levels at admission were associated within-hospital and one month follow-up mortality in MI patients. Therefore, it is recommended that ST2 levels should be checked at admission in all the patients of MI.

Limitation(s)

The sample size, study duration and follow-up period were small. This study was conducted in MI patients only, and no control group was taken. Authors only assessed ST2, NT-proBNP and hsCRP at baseline. Repeated testing was not done on follow-up, due to the costs, which would have given information on the degree of change in biomarkers following treatment. The details of the patients such as STEMI/non- STEMI) and the therapy offered to patients were not noted.

Conclusion

Suppression of Tumourigenicity 2 levels showed a statistically significant positive correlation with NT-proBNP and hsCRP, whereas ST2 levels showed a statistically significant negative correlation with LVEFin MI patients. The median ST2 levels were significantly higher in in-hospital mortality and mortality at one-month follow-upin MI patients.

References

1.
Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, Benjamin EJ, Budoff MJ, Fayad ZA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56 (25):e50-e103.
2.
Weinberg EO, Shimpo M, De Keulenaer GW, MacGillivray C, Tominaga S-I, Solomon SD, et al. Expression and regulation of ST2, an interleukin-1 receptor family member, in cardiomyocytes and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2002;106 (23):2961-66. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000038705.69871.D9. PMid: 12460879. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Moore SA, Januzzi JL. Found in translation: Soluble ST2 and heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(3):251-53. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.08.049. PMID: 20117404. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Tominaga S. A putative protein of a growth specific cDNA from BALB/c-3T3 cells is highly similar to the extracellular portion of mouse interleukin 1 receptor. FEBS Lett. 1989;258 (2):301-04. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(89)81679-5. [crossref]
5.
Trajkovic V, Sweet MJ, Xu D. T1/ST2- an IL-1 receptor-like modulator of immune responses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2004;15(2-3):87-95. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2004.02.004. PMID: 15110792. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Oshikawa K, Kuroiwa K, Tago K, Iwahana H, Yanagisawa K, Ohno S, et al. Elevated soluble ST2 protein levels in sera of patients with asthma with an acute exacerbation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164(2):277-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.2.2008120. PMID: 11463601. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Leung BP, Xu D, Culshaw S, McInnes IB, Liew FY. A novel therapy of murine collagen-induced arthritis with soluble T1/ST2. J Immunol. 2004;173(1):145-150. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.145. PMID: 15210768. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Kuroiwa K, Arai T, Okazaki H, Minota S, Tominaga S. Identification of human ST2 protein in the sera of patients with autoimmune diseases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;284(5):1104-08. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5090. PMID: 11414697. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Brunner M, Krenn C, Roth G, Moser B, Dworschak M, Jensen-Jarolim E, et al. Increased levels of soluble ST2 protein and IgG1 production in patients with sepsis and trauma. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(7):1468-73. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2184-x. PMID: 14991091. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Barksby HE, Lea SR, Preshaw PM, Taylor JJ. The expanding family of interleukin-1 cytokines and their role in destructive inflammatory disorders. Clin Exp Immunol. 2007;149(2):217-25. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2007.03441.x. PMID: 17590166. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Schmitz J, Owyang A, Oldham E, Song Y, Murphy E, McClanahan TK, et al. IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines. Immunity. 2005;23(5):479-90. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.09.015. PMID: 16286016. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Dinarello CA. An IL-1 family member requires caspase-1 processing and signals through the ST2 receptor. Immunity. 2005;23(5):461-62. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2005.10.004. PMID: 16286013. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Miller AM, Xu D, Asquith DL, Denby L, Li Y, Sattar N, et al. IL-33 reduces the development of atherosclerosis. J Exp Med. 2008;205(2):339-46. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20071868. PMID: 18268038. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Januzzi JL Jr, Peacock WF, Maisel AS, Chae CU, Jesse RL, Baggish AL, et al. Measurement of the interleukin family member ST2 in patients with acute dyspnea: results from the PRIDE (Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Investigation of Dyspnea in the Emergency Department) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(7):607-13. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2007.05.014. PMID: 17692745. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Shimpo M, Morrow DA, Weinberg EO, Sabatine MS, Murphy SA, Antman EM, et al. Serum levels of the interleukin-1 receptor family member ST2 predict mortality and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004;109(18):2186-90. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000127958.21003.5A. PMID: 15117853. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Mueller T, Dieplinger B, Gegenhuber A, Poelz W, Pacher R, Haltmayer M. Increased plasma concentrations of soluble ST2 are predictive for 1-year mortality in patients with acute destabilized heart failure. Clin Chem. 2008;54(4):752-56. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.096560. PMID: 18375488. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Rehman SU, Mueller T, Januzzi Jr JL. Characteristics of the novel interleukin family biomarker ST2 in patients with acute heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52 (18):1458-65. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.042. PMID: 19017513. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Shah RV, Chen-Tournoux AA, Picard MH, van Kimmenade RR, Januzzi JL. Serum levels of the interleukin-1 receptor family member ST2, cardiac structure and function, and long-term mortality in patients with acute dyspnea. Cir Heart Fail. 2009;2(4):311-19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.833707. PMID: 19808354. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Pascual-Figal DA, Ordoñez-Llanos J, Tornel PL, Vázquez R, Puig T, Valdés M, et al. Soluble ST2 for predicting sudden cardiac death in patients with chronic heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(23):2174-79. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.041. PMID: 19942089. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Sabatine MS, Morrow DA, Higgins LJ, MacGillivray C, Guo W, Bode C, et al. Complementary roles for biomarkers of biomechanical strain ST2 and N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;117(15):1936-44. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728022. PMID: 18378613. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Hackler E, Lew J, Gore MO, Ayers CR, Atzler D, Khera A, et al. Racial differences in cardiovascular biomarkers in the general population. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(18):e012729. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012729. PMID: 31514563. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Pascual-Figal DA, Lax A, Perez-Martinez MT, del Carmen Asensio-Lopez M, Sanchez-Mas J; GREAT Network. Clinical relevance of sST2 in cardiac diseases. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(1):29-35. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0074. PMID: 26544104. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Barbarash O, Gruzdeva O, Uchasova E, Dyleva Y, Belik E, Akbasheva O, et al. Prognostic value of soluble ST2 during hospitalization for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Ann Lab Med. 2016;36(4):313-19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2016.36.4.313. PMID: 27139603. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing clinical research: An epidemiologic approach. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. Appendix 6C, page 79.
25.
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018;138(20);e618-e651. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617. PMID: 30571511. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Jenkins W, Jaffe A, Roger V, Weston S, AbouEzzeddine O, Manemann SM, et al. Prognostic value of ST2 after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(13s):439. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(16)30440-5. [crossref]
27.
Dhillon OS, Narayan HK, Quinn PA, Squire IB, Davies JE, Ng LL. Interleukin 33 and ST2 in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: Comparison with global registry of acute coronary events risk scoring and NT-proBNP. Am Heart J. 2011;161(6):1163-70. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.03.025. PMID: 21641364. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
O’Donoghue ML, Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Jarolim P, Desai NR, Sherwood MW, et al. Multimarker risk stratification in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 ;5 (5):e002586. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002586. PMID: 27207959. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Wang TJ, Wollert KC, Larson MG, Coglianese E, McCabe EL, Cheng S, et al. Prognostic utility of novel biomarkers of cardiovascular stress: The Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2012;126(13):1596-604. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.129437. PMID:22907935. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Kohli P, Bonaca MP, Kakkar R, Kudinova AY, Scirica BM, Sabatine MS, et al. Role of ST2 in Non - ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial. Clin Chem. 2012;58(1):257-66. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2011.173369. PMID: 22096031. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/58111.16924

Date of Submission: May 30, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 23, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jul 21, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 08, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 18, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 23, 2022 (25%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com