Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 109201

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : UC40 - UC43 Full Version

Effect of Head Rotation on Efficiency of Face Mask Ventilation among Apnoeic Patients: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57335.16928
Amol Singam, Matturu Soumya, Ashok Chaudhary

1. Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Datta Meghe Medical College, Shalinitai Meghe Hospital and Research Centre, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Amol Singam,
Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharastra, India.
E-mail: dramolsingam@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Respiratory function is crucial in the practice of anaesthesia. An in depth understanding of respiratory physiology is a must because it aids in the proper execution of daily general anaesthesia practice. Head and body postures have long been known to affect the patency of the upper airway. Head extension and a lateral recumbent position help to clear the upper airway. Head rotation is known to expand the upper airway’s cross-sectional area.

Aim: To determine the effect of head rotation on efficiency of face mask ventilation among apnoeic patients, by measuring expiratory tidal volume.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India, from May 2021 to November 2021. Total 40 patients belonging to the age group of 20 to 40 years, American Society of Anaesthesiologists’ (ASA) class I and II, undergoing surgeries requiring general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation, were selected as study subjects. They were administered inj. fentanyl at a dose of 1 to 2 μg/kg, inj.propofol at a dose of 1 to 2 mg/kg, and inj.vecuronium bromide (0.08 to 0.1 mg/kg). Patients were mask ventilated with pressure-controlled ventilation, for a total of 3 minutes, during which they were ventilated in a neutral head position for 90 seconds and then rotated for another 90 seconds. Following induction, the expiratory tidal volume was measured every 30 seconds in both postures Software used was Statistical Package for Social Sciences for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), version 17.0. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean age of patients was 48±8.3 years. The 45° head rotation was beneficial to all patients, the mean expiratory tidal volume was 423±62.5 mL in the rotated head position compared to 397±52.5 mL in the neutral head position (p-value=0.045). It was also observed that some individuals profited more than others. Patients with airway obstruction, for example, had a greater VTE at 45° head rotation than in a neutral head position.

Conclusion: The most notable conclusion is that in apnoeic adult patients, a 45° head rotation showed a significant enhancement in VTE when compared to a neutral position ofthe head.

Keywords

Airway anatomy, Airway patency, End tidal carbon dioxide, Expiratory tidal volume, Posture

In the practice of anaesthesia, respiratory function is critical. A thorough understanding of fundamental respiratory physiology is necessary for performing daily general anaesthetic practice duties such as induction, maintenance, administration of mechanical ventilation, and termination of mechanical ventilation (1). After the loss of consciousness, gentle mask ventilation is deemed appropriate during rapid sequence induction, minimising the incidence of hypoxia prior to tracheal intubation (2). Various mechanisms help to improve mask ventilation like muscle relaxation, using a double C-E grip, and jaw thrust. This is especially important for people who have a shorter apnoea time. For resuscitation, an effective breathing strategy and the best equipment selection are critical. Head and body postures have long been known to affect the patency of the upper airway. Head extension and a lateral recumbent position help to clear the upper airway. Head rotation is known to expand the upper airway’s cross-sectional area (3).

Edentulous facies, the existence of a beard, and substantial gas leaks surrounding the face mask are all variables that contribute to problematic mask ventilation (4). Simple treatments include replacing dentures, packing the sides of the face around the facemask, and removing the facial hair.

Aspiration is a frequent mask ventilation hazard that may be avoided by following fasting recommendations or utilising a gastric tube to empty the stomach before airway management. Cricoid pressure can assist minimise stomach distension during mask ventilation, but it should be used with caution because it can make mask ventilation more difficult (5). Head up position, neuromuscular blockade, using airwayssuch as oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal airways, and two-handed mask ventilation can help with the inability to oxygenate and ventilate during mask ventilation (6).

Poor mask ventilation techniques, especially during emergency airway management, might have negative physiological repercussions (7). Hyperventilation, for example, lowers Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2) and causes vasoconstriction. Small tidal volumes (6-7 mL/kg) and a one-second inflation time are advised to minimise quick or violent breathing.

Head posture has a considerable effect on the collapsibility and site of the collapse of the passive human upper airway. According to Walsh JH et al., controlling head posture during sleep or recovery from anaesthesia may alter the propensity for airway obstruction (8). In a study to determine the effects of sleep posture on upper airway stability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea, Neill AM et al., found that in severely affected obstructive sleep apnea patients, upper body elevation, and to a lesser extent lateral positioning, significantly improve upper airway stability during sleep (9).

As stated above, several studies have shown that body posture and head position have an impact on airway anatomy, but it is still unclear if these have a positive impact on mask ventilation efficacy. Considering this, the study aimed to evaluate if head rotation improves the efficiency of mask ventilation in an apnoeic patient, by measuring the expiratory tidal volume.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India, from May 2021 to November 2021. The Institutional Ethics Committee had approved the study vide letter number DMIMS(DU)/IEC/2020-21/102.

Sample size calculation: Assuming mean expiratory tidal volume to be 612±68.6, as reported by Itagaki T et al., (10) and keeping power at 80%, alpha of 0.05, a sample size of 40 was calculated to detect a minimum of 20% difference in expiratory tidal volume by head rotation (using www.OpenEpi.com).

Inclusion criteria: A total of 40 patients between the ages of 20 and 60 years of either gender, undergoing surgical procedures (diagnostic laparoscopy, laparoscopic appendectomy, breast lump excision, spine surgeries) under general anaesthesia, willing to give written consent, American Society of Anaesthesiologists’ (ASA) Class I and II, Body Mass Index (BMI) less than 24.9 kg/m2, Mallampati score class I/II, and neck circumference <35.5 cm.

Exclusion criteria: Edentulous patients, patients having allergies to drugs, history of neck pain, giddiness on neck head rotation, history of cervical spine pathology, and patients with co-morbidities (cardiac diseases, on thyroid medications) were excluded from the study.

Procedure

A complete history of all the patients was taken and a thorough general examination was done for all patients. The procedure was explained to the patients before surgery to win their trust, and a signed agreement was obtained. Prior to the scheduled surgery day, all of the patients were kept fasting overnight. In the preoperative room, patients were assessed for vital factors such as pulse rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), blood pressure, and Electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities and also for cervical spine pathology.

Patients were briefed on the research methodology prior to the start of the trial. Baseline values of heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were noted using non invasive monitoring.

Patients were intravenously administered inj.fentanyl, inj.propofol, at a dose of 1 to 2 μg/kg and 1 to 2 mg/kg, respectively and inj.vecuronium bromide 0.08 to 0.1 mg/kg. Then patients were mask ventilated after attaining apnoea with pressure controlled ventilation using an anaesthesia machine at Inspiratory to Expiratory ratios (I:E) of 1:2, Peak Inspiratory Pressure (PIP) of 15 cmH2O, and a Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) of 0 cmH2O. Two hands were used to hold the mask in place, and the jaw was positioned to improve the airway.

Every patient was mask ventilated for a total of three minutes, during which they were ventilated in a neutral head position for 90 seconds (Table/Fig 1) and then in an axial head position rotated to right (Table/Fig 2) for another 90 seconds. The trial was ended and normal airway treatment was commenced if there was no breathing possible for a minimum of four breaths, which was shown by the absence of chest wall movement and End tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) trace. If the SpO2 dropped to 92% or below at any point throughout the research, it was stopped and usual airway care continued. Pulse oximetry, electrocardiography, and non invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring were used for routine monitoring.

Following induction, the expiratory tidal volume was noted from the monitor of the ventilator (GE DatexOhmeda 9100c NXT) every 30 seconds in both postures. The occurrence of tongue fall was noted (Table/Fig 3).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics such as mean, and standard deviation, as well as inferential statistics such as the Chi-square test and Student’s Unpaired t-test. Software used was Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), version 17.0. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean age of patients was 48±8.3 years (Table/Fig 4). There was no particular damage associated with therapy in any patient, with a SpO2 of less than 92%. The expiratory tidal volume (VTE) with head rotation was substantially greater 423±62.5 mL than in the neutral position 397±52.5 mL (p-value=0.045) at a 95% confidence interval.

The 45° head rotation was beneficial to all patients, it was found that while switching from a neutral position to 45° head rotation position patients with airway obstruction had a greater benifit. Airway obstruction was seen in 12 patients in total out of which eight patients had tongue fall in the neutral position and four patients in a rotated head position (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The most basic technique in airway control is mask ventilation. Mask ventilation is required immediately after intravenous infusion of anaesthetic medications to support ventilation and essentially avoid potential airway blockage. This is the primary mode of ventilation before tracheal intubation or the insertion of any airway device (11). Its most notable application is as a ventilation rescue method in the event when tracheal intubation fails or becomes difficult, or when multiple attempts are made. The mask ventilation technique generally is based on two fundamental elements: a seal between the face mask and the patient’s face is maintained, and the upper airway is not occluded in a subtle way. It may be fairly possible to lessen the morbidity related to mask ventilation if people are informed of the risks. A typical problem of mask ventilation is aspiration, due to insufflation of the stomach. Reflux of stomach contents is caused by high inflation pressures in the ventilation bag. During mask ventilation, damage to the eyes and eyelids can also happen if an improper technique is followed (12).

The present study was aimed to observe if head rotation has an impact on efficacy of mask ventilation, and was planned to measure the tidal volume in both the positions. Furthermore, since a constant PIP was maintained throughout mask ventilation, the VTE could be correlated to the patency of the airway directly and to the degree of obstruction of the airway indirectly. It was observed that head rotation has a significant effect on mask ventilation.

Hillman DR et al., described various factors that contribute to upper airway blockage under general anaesthesia, such as the decreased activity of the dilator muscle of pharynx and effects of gravity on airway structures in the supine posture (13). Weingart SD et al., observed that lateral positioning, as well as the reverse Trendelenburg position, increases the mask ventilation effectiveness (14), suggesting a higher incidence of airway blockage in the supine position, as seen in the present study. It was previously suggested by studies that more effective and better mask ventilation is possible with head rotation but never systematically shown.

Armstrong JJ et al., used imaging and endoscopic methods to investigate the effects of head rotation on upper airway collapsibility (15). Schwab RJ and Goldberg AN, have conducted MRI studies in normal awake patients and observed that in both head rotation and lateral recumbent position there was a significant increase of retroglossal and retropalatal areas’ anteroposterior dimension (16). Similar findings were present in this study as well, concluding that better mask ventilation was possible with head rotation when compared to supine. Because airway blockage is thought to be caused by a decrease in the length of the pharyngeal tube (16), head rotation may allow the soft tissue to shift out of the submandibular area, improving mask ventilation by reducing airway obstruction (17). Head rotation caused a significant increase in the upper airway diameter in the neck, as well as an increase in the cross-sectional area in the retroglossal region, according to Ono T et al., (18). Thus, airway patency is well maintained with head rotated position which was observed in the present study as well.

Zhu K et al., concluded when the head rotated from supine to lateral with the trunk in the supine position, Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) severity decreased dramatically, especially in non obese patients. These findings show that, in patients with OSA, the head position has a significant impact on the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), regardless of trunk posture or sleep stage (19).

Despite the fact that multiple studies have found that head and body posture have a substantial impact on airway structure, there is very limited knowledge available on its impact on mask ventilation. A 45-degree head rotation has a good effect on mask breathing performance, according to a study by Itagaki T et al., (10), however the results were not statistically significant. The present study also found that head rotation enhances mask ventilation efficacy, and the results were statistically significant. It was observed that head rotation reduced the overall incidence of tongue fall leading to airway obstruction, indicating that head rotation helps to preserve airway patency.

Mask ventilation particularly is an important skill for both airway management and for the facilitation of definitely effective oxygenation as well and proper patient positioning actually is of the actually utmost importance (20) because difficult mask breathing frequently occurs in conjunction with difficult kind of tracheal intubation (21). The population in the present study, in particular, requires adequate ventilation in order to allow for several or protracted attempts of intubation. The findings of this study show that when an airway blockage is encountered, the most basically effective strategy, for the most part, is to turn the head of the patient to change the position of the tidal volume (VT).

Limitation(s)

Owing to anatomical variations between paediatric and adult airways, the findings cannot be applied to children. The study only evaluated paralysed adult patients. Finally, the study only looked at the effect of head rotation to the right, and not to the left. Though it is not anticipated that rotation in the other direction would change the finding because commonly airway blockage is symmetric.

Conclusion

The most notable conclusion of our study actually was that in apnoeic adult patients, expiratory tidal volume increased significantly with a 45° head rotation when compared to the neutral position of the head, basically contrary to popular belief. It also had a definitely lesser incidence of airway obstruction. From the present study, it was ascertain that head rotation specifically has the sort of potential to reduce the occurrence of airway obstruction as in this study we specifically have compared the airway and incidence of tongue fall within a patient in two different positions.

References

1.
Gaba DM, Fish KJ, Howard SK, Burden A. Crisis management in anaesthesiology EBook. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2nd Edition. 2014.
2.
El-Orbany M, Connolly LA. Rapid sequence induction and intubation: Current controversy. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(5):1318-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Özbek MM, Miyamoto K, Lowe AA, Fleetham JA. Natural head posture, upper airway morphology and obstructive sleep apnoea severity in adults. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20(2):133-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Finucane BT, Santora AH, Tsui BC. Principles of Airway Management. New York: Springer; 2003.
5.
Ellis DY, Harris T, Zideman D. Cricoid pressure in emergency department rapid sequence tracheal intubations: A risk-benefit analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(6):653-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Myatra SN, Shah A, Kundra P, Patwa A, Ramkumar V, Divatia JV, et al. All India Difficult Airway Association 2016 guidelines for the management of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation in adults. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60(12):885. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Hasegawa K, Hiraide A, Chang Y, Brown DF. Association of prehospital advanced airway management with neurologic outcome and survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2013;309(3):257-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Walsh JH, Maddison KJ, Platt PR, Hillman DR, Eastwood PR. Influence of head extension, flexion, and rotation on collapsibility of the passive upper airway. Sleep. 2008;31(10):1440-47.
9.
Neill AM, Angus SM, Sajkov D, McEvoy RD. Effects of sleep posture on upper airway stability in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 1997;155(1):199-104. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Itagaki T, Oto J, Burns SM, Jiang Y, Kacmarek RM, Mountjoy JR, et al. The effect of head rotation on efficiency of face mask ventilation in anaesthetised apnoeic adults: A randomised, crossover study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(7):432-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Davies RJ. The relationship between neck circumference, radiographic pharyngeal anatomy, and the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur Respir J. 1990;3(5):509-14.
12.
Baker P. Mask ventilation [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2018, 7(F1000 Faculty Rev):1683. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15742.1. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Hillman DR, Platt PR, Eastwood PR. The upper airway during anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2003;91(1):31-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59(3):165-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Armstrong JJ, Leigh MS, Sampson DD, Walsh JH, Hillman DR, Eastwood PR, et al. Quantitative upper airway imaging with anatomic optical coherence tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173(2):226-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Schwab RJ, Goldberg AN. Upper airway assessment: Radiographic and other imaging techniques. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1998;31(6):931-68. [crossref]
17.
Isono S, Tanaka A, Nishino T. Lateral position decreases collapsibility of the passive pharynx in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(4):780-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Ono T, Otsuka R, Kuroda T, Honda E, Sasaki T. Effects of head and body position on two-and three-dimensional configurations of the upper airway. J Dent Res. 2000;79(11):1879-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Zhu K, Bradley TD, Patel M, Alshaer H. Influence of head position on obstructive sleep apnea severity. Sleep and Breathing. 2017;21(4):821-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
El-Orbany M, Woehlck HJ. Difficult mask ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(6):1870-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Jimson CT, Rimm EB, Hussain A. Predicting difficult endotracheal intubation in surgical patients scheduled for general anaesthesia: A prospective blind study. Anesth Analg. 1995;81(2):254-58. [crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57335.16928

Date of Submission: Apr 26, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 27, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jul 04, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 09, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 01, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 29, 2022 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com