Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 332608

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : September | Volume : 16 | Issue : 9 | Page : XC06 - XC11 Full Version

Survival of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients- A Retrospective Study from the Yopougon University Hospital, Abidjan, Ivory Coast


Published: September 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55566.16886
Alexis Dohoma Silue, Emeuraude Ndhatz, Romeo Ayemou, Boidy Kouakou, Clotaire Danho Nanho, A Ismael Kamar, Ndogomo Meite, Gustave Kouassi Koffi

1. Doctor, Department of Haematology, Felix Houphouet Boigny University, Abidjan, Lagune, Ivory Coast. 2. Doctor, Department of Haematology, Felix Houphouet Boigny University, Abidjan, Lagune, Ivory Coast. 3. Doctor, Department of Haematology, Allasane Ouattara, Univer Sity, Bouake, Bandama, Ivory Coast. 4. Doctor, Department of Haematology, Felix Houphouet Boigny University, Abidjan, Lagune, Ivory Coast. 5. Doctor, Department of Haematology, Felix Houphouet Boigny University, Abidjan, Lagune, Ivory Coast. 6. Doctor, Department of Haematology, Felix Houphouet Boigny University, Abidjan, Lagune, Ivory Coast. 7. Doctor, Department of Haematology, Felix Houphouet Boigny University, Abidjan, Lagune, Ivory Coast. 8. Doctor, Department of Haematology, Felix Houphouet Boigny University, Abidjan, Lagune, Ivory Coast.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Alexis Dohoma Silue,
09 BP 1692 ABIDJA N 09, Abidjan, Lagune, Ivory Coast.
E-mail: saintsdal@yahoo.fr

Abstract

Introduction: The survival of acute leukaemia patients has improved significantly thanks to multidrug chemotherapy and the development of cell therapy and marrow transplantation. However, this is not the case in Middle Income Countries (MICs), particularly in CĂ´te d’Ivoire, West Africa where much efforts are still needed to improve the treatment of these patients.This study raises the issue of the fate and survival of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) patients in these countries.

Aim: To study the overall survival and survival factors of patients with AML under the present practice conditions.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Haematology of Yopougon University Hospital in Abidjan, Ivory Coast. The data was collected from January 2005-April 2019 and data processing happened over a duration of one year from November 2019-November 2020. The mortality and survival were studied on 75 AML patients.The socio-demographic, pretherapeutic and therapeutic characteristics were recorded. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistics version 26 was used for data analysis, comparisons were done using by the Chi-square test and survival through the Kaplan Meier method and the log rank test.

Results: The patient’s age ranged from 1 to 74 years, with two peaks (37 and 49 years old) with a sex ratio at 1.03. Majority of patients (50.7%) had a low socio-economic level. Overall, 81.6% of patients started treatment within two weeks. Out of total patients 38 (50.7%) patients received chemotherapy, which was curative for 10 (13.33%) patients and palliative for 28 (37.33%) patients. There was not a single patient of complete remission. A total of 4 (5.3%) were alive, 51 (68%) died, and 10 (26.7%) were lost to follow-up. The average overall survival (OS) was 90 days and the probabilitý of Overall Survival (OS) was 62% at one month, 49% at six months, and 10% at one year. The predictive factors for prolonged survival were high socio-economic level (p=0.046) - absence of bleeding syndrome (p-0.04) - haemoglobin level ≥10 g/dL (p-0.02) - cytological type different from AML-M0 (p-0.05).

Conclusion: The therapeutic results were inferior to those obtained in developed countries where high level diagnostic and therapeutic techniques give very promising results. This study highlighted the difficulties of AML management and identified five prognostic factors of survival in the care conditions of MIC.

Keywords

Assessment, Chemotherapy, Middle income countries, Mortality, Prognosis

Ivory Coast is a MIC in West Africa, where AML is estimated to account for only 1% of cancers and represent 0.7% of hospital admissions (1),(2). The overall incidence is low and their frequency is underestimated in Africa due to lack of diagnostic and care infrastructure.

The management of acute leukaemia has improved markedly with chemotherapy and the development of cell therapy and bone marrow transplantation (2). According to The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR); the probabilities for survival at 10 years after Haematopoetic Cellular Transplant (HCT) were 84% for AML, 84% for ALL. The CIBMTR, is a group of nearly 500 HCT centers worldwide that contribute detailed data on all the allogenic HCT performed at their centers. It is a research affiliate of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry, Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry, and the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) established in 2004 (3).

However, this is not the case in MICs, particularly in CĂ´te d’Ivoire, (West-Africa), where many efforts are still needed to improve the treatment of these patients. In contrast to developed countries, diagnosis is delayed and approximate due to the small number of specialists, limited access to imaging (e.g., Positron emission tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography scan) and high-tech laboratory practices (e.g., immunophenotyping, molecular biology and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies). Refusal or abandonment of treatment, lack of adherence to treatment and especially inadequate supportive care contribute to poor outcome. These obstacles are themselves linked to unfavorable factors such as the absence of universal health coverage as in France. This last situation increases private or family financial constraints. Finally, mobility difficulties or interference with traditional medicine can also play an occasional role.

The reality in MICs such as CĂ´te d’Ivoire, resembles another model of patient care that could be compared to the obligation of result rather than the obligation of means, in the sense that the caregiver would be expected to obtain good results without giving him all the means of adequate care. Indeed, the medical code of ethics imposes on the physician the obligation of means and not the obligation of result (4). The physician and the health care system must use all available means for a better care of the patient.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the survival of patients with AML in MIC practice and care conditions. The secondary objectives were to analyse the impact of pretherapeutic characteristics on the survival and identify prognostic factors applicable to the living and working conditions.

Material and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Haematology of Yopougon University Hospital in Abidjan, Ivory Coast. The data was collected from January 2005-April 2019 and data processing happened over a duration of one year from November 2019-November 2020. A total of 75 patients with AML were selected.

Inclusion criteria: Patients with AML diagnosed on the basis of cytological diagnosis by myelogram or on the basis of immunophenotyping diagnosis by bone marrow aspiration were included in the study.

Study Procedure

Patients were enrolled on the basis of their medical records containing clinical and biological pretherapy data by blood count (haemogram), myelogram, immunophenotyping, and conventional cytogenetic (karyotype).

The patient files selected were the complete files containing the following information:

Non therapeutic data regarding chemotherapy which could be:

• Either curative with the CA-CRB protocol (Cytarabine (CA) - Cerubudine (CRB) i.e. induction 3+7, consolidation and maintenance therapy);
• Or palliative chemotherapy (Aracytin 15 to 30 mg/m2 subcutaneous for 15 days every month or hydoxyurea 25 to 50mg/kg day or prednisone 1 to 2 mg per days)

On therapeutic data regarding therapeutic response:

• Complete Remission (CR) which was defined as absence of all clinical signs, normalization of the haemogram, reduction of bone marrow blastosis below 5%.
• The delay of CR was defined as the time between the date of initiation of treatment and the date of the myelogram confirming CR.
• Partial Remission (PR) was defined as a decrease in tumour syndrome without achieving complete remission.
• Induction failure when after induction therapy, full remission was not achieved.

On patient outcome

• Lost to follow-up, known as abandonments were defined as patients who stopped treatment against medical advice and/or lost contact with the physician or other health care professional.
• Living patients were those who were regularly followed in the department
• Deaths in the hospital.

Finally, the patients were enrolled on the basis their medical records providing socio-demographic data (age, sex, place of residence) and allowing an estimation of the Socio-Economic Status (SES). This status was assessed through criteria such as employment and income, family size, daily expenses, presence of running water, presence of electricity, ability to pay for prescriptions. The most relevant was average family income. The files used provided complete data to estimate the average monthly income. The socio-economic level was considered low if the average income was below the lowest monthly guaranteed interprofessional wage allowed in this country (the guaranteed minimum wage = 100 dollars) and considered high if the income was higher than 2000 dollars per month.

Statistical Analysis

The SPSS, version 26, was used for data analysis. Comparisons were made using Chi-square test. The significance level of the p-value was ≤0.05. The Relative Risk (RR) and its Confidence Interval (CI) were used to estimate the significance of the observed differences. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan Meier method and the log rank test was used to compare the survival curves.

Results

Pre-therapeutic characteristics are described in (Table/Fig 1). The mean age of the population was 37.49 ± 20.04 years. Majority of the population belonged to the age group of 20-40 and 50-60 years with 22 (29.3%) and 24 (32%), respectively. The sex ratio was 1.03. The majority of patients had a low 38 (50.7%) or intermediate 34 (45.3%) socio-economic status. The common reasons for admission was cytopenia 44 (58.7%) and hyperleukocytosis 18 (24%). Two-thirds of the patients were examined within three months and 13 (17.3%) had a previous diagnosis (Table/Fig 1). About 11 (14.7%) had a World Health Organisation/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (WHO/ECOG) =1 or Performance status (PS) =1 (5).

There were patients with anaemic syndrome 70 (93.3%), infectious syndrome 63 (84%), and haemorrhagic syndrome 16 (21.3%). The tumoural syndrome was present in 45 (60%) (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2).

On the paraclinical aspect, leukocytic AML >100 g/L was noted among 23 (30.7%), haemoglobin level <10 g/dL among 70 (93.3%), thrombocytopenia <100 g/L in 57 (67%). According to the French American British classification (FAB), there were 45.3% patients with unclassified AML (6). Only 10 patients could undergo cytogenetics, which was found to be normal in three patients. The majority had an unfavourable prognosis (81.3%), and 60% had no co-morbidities.

Treatment characteristics

Overall, 81.6% of patients started treatment within two weeks. The mean time to initiation of treatment was estimated to be 18 days (1-307 days). Only 38 (50.7%) patients received chemotherapy, it was curative for 10 (13.33%) patients and palliative for 28 (37.33%) patients. The curative protocol used induction chemotherapy 3+7 (CytArabine - CeRuBudine) and the palliative treatment used low dose cytarabine in 17 (60.7%) patients, hydroxyurea in 8 (28.6%) patients and corticotherapy 3 (10.7%) patients. Concerning the untreated patients: they had only symptomatic treatment and reanimation care (Table/Fig 1).

A total of 51 cases of death occurred (68%). The causes of death were decompensated anemia in 23 (45%) patients, followed by septic shock 6 (12%) patients, leukostasis and respiratory failure 3 (6%) patients, and 19 (37%) patients of cardiopulmonary arrest due to undetermined causes.

Mortality was associated with haemoglobin level (p=0.045) and type of chemotherapy used (p=0.041) (Table/Fig 2).

The mean OS was 90 days and the median was 44 days with a probability of 62% at one month; 49% at six months and 10% at one year (Table/Fig 3). The survival was associated to the SES (log rank=0.046) (Table/Fig 4).

The median survival varied significantly by cytologic type (Table/Fig 5) (log rank=0.05)

And the survival was significantly different based on the presence or absence of haemorrhagic syndrome (log rank=0.04) (Table/Fig 6) and the haemoglobin level (log rank: 0.02) (Table/Fig 7). The same was found clinically but not significantly influencing survival (log rank: 0.18) (Table/Fig 8).

The oldest patients had a median survival of 35 days, versus 54 days for the youngest (log rank=0.44). However, the probability of survival at three months was better for the youngest patients, 11% against 7% for those older than 37 years (Table/Fig 8).

The impact of gender was not significant (p=0.70). However, the median survival of men seemed to be higher (44 days versus 38 days). Survival at three months was more or less the same between the two sexes (10% and 9% M/F).

The median survival of WHO performance status was 44 days for PS 1 and 2 versus 37 days for PS 3. The probability of survival at three months was 27% for patients with PS 1 and 2 versus 14% for patients with WHO performances status (PS)= 3. (log rank=0.83). (Table/Fig 8).

There was no significant influence of presence of clinical tumour syndrome and leukocytosis on survival of patients. The survival curves according to bone marrow blasts were not significantly different. Finally, when the time to initiation of treatment was short (<15 days), the median survival was 138 days versus 54 days. Depending on whether chemotherapy was curative or not, the median survival was 53 days with a three month probability of survival of 19% versus a median of 68 days and a three month probability of 33% for palliative chemotherapy. (log rank: 0.36) (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

The incidence of AML is low before the age of 40 years, then increases significantly after 60 years, reaching 20 to 30 cases per 100,000 after 85 years (7). According to the international literature like Algeria, the sex ratio is close to 1 with a slight male predominance (8). The age difference between Africa and the West could be explained by the low life expectancy in Africa compared to western countries. According to the WHO, the life expectancy in Ivory Coast was 58 years in 2018 (9).

As in the majority of African studies, poor socio-economic conditions represent a poor prognostic factor (10),(11). In this study, 85.3% of patients had a performance status (PS) >2. According to the Swedish cancer registries (2009), at the time of diagnosis of 2696 patients, a distribution of PS by age was most favorable in the 40- 44 age group and declined with age. In total, half of the patients had a PS 0 or I at diagnosis (12). This was probably due to the fact that the Swedish healthcare system is more adapted to make the diagnosis earlier. Thus, the patients presented good condition at diagnosis.

There are two major syndromes in all acute leukaemias, the tumour syndrome and bone marrow failure.Hyperleukocytosis, which is one of the biological indicators of tumour syndrome, was >100 g/L in one-third of the cases in this study. Like other African authors, Jmili NB et al., reported that hyperleukocytosis was a poor prognostic factor (13).

The bone marrow failure syndrome was observed in all cases. Rubie H et al., also found anemia in 100% of patients. These cytopenias could be explained by the proliferation of blasts (14). It is known that their mitotic index is higher than that of physiological hematopoiesis, and that they induce asphyxiation of the normal cells of the bone marrow.The importance of medullary proliferation of blast cells is constantly reported in the literature as in the work of Löwenberg B et al.,. However, no correlation has been found between the proportion of medullary blast cells and circulating blast cells (11).

The delay to start the treatment could be related to the delay of diagnosis, linked to the insufficient medical infrastructure and the non-performing health care system, but above all to the low socio-economic level of patients, which constitutes a real problem for the acquisition of drugs. These reasons could explain the low rate of induction of AML in the MICs, as also reported by African peers.Randriamampianina T et al., in Madagascar, reported the induction rate of 20.7% (10). Therefore, palliative care and palliative chemotherapy remained the alternative, giving rise to a high rate in this study.

It should be noted that no patient achieved CR. These results are much lower than other studies, in which the CR rate is approximately 60% to 80% in young adults and 35% to 60% in elderly subjects (14),(15). The therapeutic response was higher in the reported studies because of the combination of targeted therapy with low dose aracytin. Le Floch AC et al., and Slovak ML et al., reported a CR of 76.5% and 71%, respectively (16),(17). Several factors may explain the absence of CR in the present study like the delay in diagnosis as well as in the initiation of treatment, the low socio-economic level in the face of the high cost of chemotherapy, inadequate health structures for therapeutic intensification, and defective hematological resuscitation support, notably the insufficiency or non availability of blood products and haematopoietic growth factors.

The high mortality rate of the patients in this series could be linked to absence of CR. The results of this study are superior to those reported in the literature from France where approximately 30% of deaths per year were noted. Koffi KG et al., in CĂ´te d’Ivoire, reported 51% of deaths (18),(19). The causes of death of patients were the same as in the literature where they are often related to bone marrow failure inherent to AML or post chemotherapy (1).

Age is a powerful prognostic factor for the achievement of CR and survival of patients even if this study did not find a significant impact on mortality. AML in elderly subjects has a poor prognosis (12),(20). In addition, unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities, and AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndromes increase with age. A study from Seattle, United States observed a total of 116 deaths in a population of 955 patients. There were 37 deaths in patients under 65 years of age versus 79 in older patients (15). This difference with the index study results could be due to the high proportion of those lost to follow-up (26.7%), which may have underestimated the death rate in the age group over 37 years (Table/Fig 2).

Koffi KG et al., in another African study, reported that the male sex seemed to have a better prognosis than the female sex (19). Additionally, one must take into account the social vulnerability of the female sex in African society. Few other authors did not find gender to be a factor influencing mortality[ 20],(21),(22).

Some African authors (19),(23), have suggested that in Africa, a poor socio-economic level is an element of poor prognosis and a high socio-economic status is an element of good prognosis (19),(23). This was due to the high cost of antibiotics, which were not accessible to the vast majority of patients with low socio-economic status.

In this study, the tumour syndrome had no significant impact on mortality, although the death rate was higher when the tumour syndrome was significant. According to some authors the best indicator of tumour syndrome is leukocytosis, the increase of which is often cited as a poor prognostic factor (20),(24),(25). Although the tumour syndrome may be absent, the bone marrow failure syndrome is observed in all cases. Archimbaud E et al., in their study on sequential chemotherapy in advanced AML, concluded that haemoglobin level <10 g/dL is a poor prognostic element. This is not true with thrombocytopenia (21),(26).

The sooner the treatment is started, the better the therapeutic response and consequently the death rate. On this basis, it can be said that there was a link, even if not significant, between treatment delay and mortality. Döhner H et al., and Huguet F et al., affirmed that the results of induction treatment of AML are unfavorable when the delay in treatment initiation is greater than five days (2),(27). Similarly, Sekeres MA et al., pointed out that a longer delay is associated with a decrease of CR and survival in young patients <60 years) (28).

Regarding palliative chemotherapy, the results reported in the literature are much better than in this series, which should lead us to review protocols such as those using low dose Aracytin. Indeed, Bolwell BJ et al., and Burnett AK et al., had obtained a CR rate between 31% and 18 %, respectively (29),(30). The use of palliative chemotherapy such as low dose cytarabine allows to obtain 30% of CR against 60% to 80% of the complete remission rate for curative chemotherapy (11). This could be explained by the inefficiency of the healthcare system and the chain of care from the first orientation of the patient at the appearance of the first symptoms to the treatment and follow-up. Indeed, the decision to start a curative treatment of AML in MICs depends on many parameters unthinkable for a Westerner. These include socio-economic conditions, the unavailability of the technical platform necessary to establish the prognosis to make a better decision, the unavailability and/or unaffordable cost of drugs for induction and hematological resuscitation such as labile blood products and hematopoietic growth factors.

This research identified five factors that significantly influenced overall survival in the care conditions of MICs socio-economic status, haemorrhagic syndrome, haemoglobin level ,cytological type, and type of chemotherapy used and the mean OS was 90 days and the median was 44 days with a probability of 62% at one month; 49% at six months and 10% at one year. In contrast, the overall survival rate was higher in more developed countries, Maloisel F et al., in France noted 11.8 months (31).

Lehmann S et al., noted that bleeding was the most common cause of death observed in their study and that these bleeding deaths occurred at a median of four days after diagnosis (32). Moreover, Estey E et al., in their study on the prediction of survival during induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML, concluded that eight quantifiable factors affect the risk of mortality related to induction therapy, among which the haemoglobin level (33). Finally, regarding cytological type, the data of the present study is in agreement with of Reiffers J et al., who observed that the CR rate was higher in M1, M2 and M3 forms than in M4 and M5 forms in their studies (34). However, FAB classification does not appear to be a prognostic parameter independent of cytogenetics and molecular biology (35). Rare phenotypes of AML, including AML 0, 6 and 7 are associated with a poor prognosis (36).

Some authors stated that the survival of patients with a PS of 1 and 2 was significantly better than that of patients with a PS of 3. Juliusson G et al., concluded that patients with a PS >2 had a worse prognosis independent of age (12). Appelbaum FR pointed out that the combination of age and performance status is highly predictive of early death after induction therapy in elderly patients (15).

Limitation(s)

The notion of prognosis in our conditions of practice must be nuanced, because immunophenotyping and cytogenetics which are essential to establish the prognosis were almost never performed.

Conclusion

These unsatisfactory results are inherent to several factors: advanced stage of the disease, diagnostic and therapeutic management difficulties related to the poor technical platform, difficulties in supplying antimitotic drugs, difficulties in monitoring patients and the precarious nature of the population. Low socio-economic status, presence of haemorrhagic syndrome, haemoglobin level below 10, AML-M0 cytological type and absence of induction therapy are the poor prognostic factors of overall survival in the care conditions of a MIC country. The improvement of survival results will require the setting up of adapted hospital infrastructures, the improvement of the technical platform, the training of qualified medical and paramedical personnel and the assurance of economic support to families.

References

1.
N’dhatz C E, Koffi KG, Ayemou R, Nanho DC, Alla D, Kouakou B, et al. Prevalence and incidence of hematological malignancies: Teaching hospital of yopougon. Rev Int Sc Med. 2012;14,3:205-08.
2.
Döhner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum RF, Büchner T, Burnett KA, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: Recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European Leukemia Net. Blood. 2010;115(3):453-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Wingard JR, Majhail NS, Brazauskas R, Wang Z, Sobocinski KA, Jacobsohn D, et al. Long-term survival and late deaths after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(16):2230-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
National Order of Physicians of The Republic of France. Code of Ethics and Medical Deontology: The Public Health Code of the French Republic, Edition February 2021 article number R.4127.31-34.
5.
Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982; 5:649-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR, et al. Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group. Br J Haemato. 1976;33(4):451-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Miranda-Filho A, Piñeros M, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Monnereau A, Bray B, et al. Epidemiological patterns of leukaemia in 184 countries: A population-based study. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5(1):14-24. [crossref]
8.
Bekadja MA, Hamladji RM, Belhani M, Ardjoun FZ, Abad MT, Touhami H, et al. Apopulation-basedstudy of the epidemiology and clinical features of adults with acute myeloid leukemia in Algeria: Report on behalf of the Algerian acute leukemia study group. Hematol Oncol Stem Cel Ther. 2011;4(4):161-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Buettner T. World Population Prospects - A Long View. Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics. 2020;520 521:9-27. [crossref]
10.
Randriamampianina T, Rahantamalala MI, Ralaimihoatra VH, Vololontiana HMD, RakotoAlson AO. Treatment of adults acute leukemia views at the university hospital center joseph ravoahangy andrianavalona (chujra) antananarivo. Journal of Medical Care Research and Review. 2019;2(10):01-05.
11.
Löwenberg B, Griffin JD, Tallman MS. Acute myeloid leukemia and acute promyelocytic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2003;(1):82-101. [crossref]
12.
Juliusson G, Antunovic P, Derolf A, Lehmann S, Möllgård L, Stockelberg D, et al. Age and acute myeloid leukemia: Real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Blood. 2009;113:4179-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Jmili NB, Sendi SH, Khelif A. Acute myeloid leukemias in Tunisia: Epidemiological and clinical characteristics and WHO classification. J Afr Cancer. 2010;2:25-32. [crossref]
14.
Rubie H, Assouline C, Prere MF, Dutour A, Lemozy J, Mouls JL, et al. Infectious complications of treatment of lynphoblastic leukemia in children. Pediatrics C. Elsivier. Paris. 1990;45(5):333-38.
15.
Appelbaum FR, Gundacker H, Head DR, Marilyn LS, Cheryl LW, John EG, et al. Age and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2006;107(9):3481-85. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Le Floch AC, Eisinger F, Sfumato P. Study of precariousness using the Epices score during acute myeloid leukemia treated with induction chemotherapy. Hematology. 2018;24(suppl No. 1):81.
17.
Slovak ML, Kopecky KJ, Cassileth PA. Karyotypic analysis predicts the outcome of pre-remission and post-remission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: A Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Blood. 2000;96(13):4075-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Najman A, Veroy E, Potron G, Isnard F. Les leucémies aiguĂ«s. Hématologie; Précis des Maladies du sang: tome II, 1994: p156-59.
19.
Koffi KG, Emmou AS, Diop S, Aka-Adjo MA, N’dathz E, Malanda F, et al. Results and complications of induction treatment of acute leukemia in black africans people, experience of the clinical hematology department of the Abidjan university hospital. Médecined’Afrique Noire. 1997;44(12):642-45.
20.
Josy RF, Lacombe, Puntous M. Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in adults. Rev Prat (Paris). 1996;46:62-68.
21.
Archimbaud E, Vlebond P. Fenaux P, Dombret H, Cordonnier C, Dreyfus F, et al. Timed sequential chemotherapy for advenseed acute myeloid leukemia. Hrematol Cell Ther. 1996;38:161-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Michel G, Baruchdl A, Tabone MD: Induction chemotherapy followed by allergenic. Bone Narrow transplatation or aggressive consolidation chemotherapy in childhood acute myeloblastic leukemia. A prospecgive study from french society of pediatric hematology and immunology. Hématol Cell Therapy. 1996;38:169-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Mbensa L, Ngiyulur, Binda P. Acute leukemia in children. Incidence and clinical manifestation in tropical environment. Médecine d’Afrique Noire. 1993;40:08-09.
24.
Dutcher JP, Schiffer CA, Wiernik PH. Hyperleukocytosis in adult acute non lymphocytic leukemia: Impact on remission rate and duration, and survival. J Clin Oncol. 1987;5(9):1364-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Najmann A. Acute leukemia in Hematology Handbook of blood diseases. Volume II 1994:156-59.
26.
Valcarcel D, Montesinos P, Sanchez OI, Brunet S, Esteve J, Martínez-Cuadrón D, et al. A scoring system to predict the risk of death during induction with anthracycline plus cytarabine-based chemotherapy in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2012;118:410-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Huguet F, Recher C. Acute leukemias in adults. Hematology. 2011;17(3):203-24. [crossref]
28.
Sekeres MA, Elson P, Kalaycio ME, Advani AS, Copelan EA, Faderl S, Kantarjian HM, et al. Time from diagnosis to treatment initiation predicts survival in younger, but not older, acute myeloid leukemia patients. Blood. 2009;113 (1):28-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Bolwell BJ, Cassileth PA, Gale RP. Low-dose cybosine arabinoside in myelodysplasia and acute leukemia: A review. Leukemia. 1989;1(8):575-79.
30.
Burnett AK, Milligan D, Prentice AG, Goldstone AH, McMullin MF, Hills RK, et al. A comparison of low-dose cytarabine and hydroxyurea with or without all-trans retinoic acid for acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome in patients not considered fit for intensive treatment. Cancer. 2007;109:1114-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Maloisel F, Mbouma T, Baati N. Real-life outcomes of azacitidine treatment in patients aged 70 years and older with de novo acute myeloblastic leukemia or secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome. Hematology. 2018;24(suppl No. 1):75.
32.
Lehmann S, Ravn U, Carlsson L. Continued high early mortality in acute promyelocytic leukemia: A population-based report from the Swedish Adult Acute Leukemia Registry. Leukemia. 2011;25:1128-34. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Estey E, Smith TL, Keating MJ. Prediction of survival during induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 1989;3(4):257-63.
34.
Reiffers J, Perel Y, David B. Treatment of acute leukemias. Hématologie de Bernard Dreyfus. Paris: Flammarion Médecine-Sciences. 1992:805-25.
35.
Bennet JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT. Proposals for the classification of acute leukemias: French-American-British (FAB) cooperative group. British Journal of Haematology. 1976;33:451. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Cuneo A, Ferrant A, Michaux JL. Cytogenetic profile of minimally differentiated (FAB MO) acute myeloid leukemia: Correlation with clinicobiologic findings. Blood. 1995;85(12):3688-94. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55566.16886

Date of Submission: Feb 14, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 28, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 31, 2022
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 17, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 28, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 09, 2022 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com