Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 18817

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : January | Volume : 17 | Issue : 1 | Page : BD01 - BD04 Full Version

Wilson’s Disease with Late Hepatic Involvement


Published: January 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58489.17316
Mahavir Raghunath Mundra, Manju Chand Ankhede, Pradip Jain, Ashish Anjankar

1. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Datta Meghe Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Datta Meghe Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, Datta Meghe Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 4. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Sawangi,Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Mahavir Raghunath Mundra,
Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Datta Meghe Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drmahavir123@gmail.com

Abstract

Wilson’s Disease (WD) is an autosomal recessive condition that affects copper metabolism and manifests itself clinically in different ways. The diagnosis is indicated by low serum copper and ceruloplasmin concentrations, increased urine copper excretion and/or increased hepatic copper concentrations. The present case report is about a 55-year-old male with chief complaints of loss of appetite, abdominal swelling, tremors in hand and head, slurring of speech for 10 days. Ultrasound (USG) findings were suggestive of liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension and liver function tests were also deranged. He was prescribed diuretics and asked to review after 10 days. Kayser-Fleischer ring was observed through slit lamp examination in both the eyes, which is a hallmark of WD. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of brain also revealed positive findings-hyperintensity throughout the mesencephalon for WD. Thereafter, the patient was treated with penicillamine and his symptoms improved after few days.

Keywords

Liver cirrhosis, Penicillamine, Tremor

Case Report

A 55-year-old male patient visited Outpatient Department with the complaints of loss of appetite, swelling and fullness in the abdomen, tremors in hand and head, slurring of speech since 10 days.

He was advised Ultrasound (USG) abdomen along with routine investigations. On USG, the liver appears to have a rough texture with echo, dilated portal vein, development of collaterals, and there is significant ascites. The patient was non alcoholic and tested seronegative for hepatitis B and hepatitis A. He was prescribed diuretics and called for review after seven days.

The patient visited for review after one week and he was feeling better but this time he revealed that he was diagnosed with Wilson’s Disease (WD) 10 years prior, when he was 45 years old (previously reported to hospital with complaints of joint pains). For three years, the patient was on penicillamine with remission of symptoms. But it relapsed when he stopped the medication for five years (as penicillamine was not available in the area where he relocated). Few months ago he started the treatment again. Since the last few days, he had lost his appetite and weight, as well as acquired abdominal enlargement due to fluid accumulation in abdominal cavity. He had tremors in his head and hands with slurred speech.

The patient was referred for ophthalmological examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) brain and liver was advised, and blood investigations for serum copper, serum ceruloplasmin and urinary copper excretion were suggested. Kayser-Fleischer (KF) rings were observed in both eyes during a slit lamp examination (Table/Fig 1). T2 and Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) hyperintensity was found in tegmentum of midbrain on MRI. The red nucleus and thalamus were spared (Table/Fig 2). The ventricular system and the basal cisterns were somewhat dilated. In the subcortical and periventricular white matter of both cerebral hemispheres, T2 and FLAIR hyperintensities were seen. On MRI scans of the abdomen, the liver showed macronodular cirrhosis.

Thus, WD was confirmed based on the biochemical tests that included serum ceruloplasmin, serum copper, and 24-hour urine copper. Penicillamine therapy at a dose of 1 gm per day was restarted. Tablet Zinc 50 mg twice daily, Tablet pyridoxine 25 mg twice daily, Tablet pacitane 2 mg twice daily, Tab. Torsemide 10 mg Once a day, Tab. Propanolol 20 mg three times a day were among the other drugs. Within 2-3 days, the patient’s condition had improved. He regained his appetite as well as his general sense of well-being. The ascites and tremors lessened significantly.

Discussion

Wilson’s disease is very uncommon genetic cause of abnormal copper metabolism characterized by copper buildup in the liver, brain, and other tissues. It affects one in every 30,000 people (1). The metal is first deposited in the liver, then released in the circulation, and then chronically accumulated in the Central Nervous System (CNS) and other tissues. Cirrhosis of the liver develops at an early age. Midbrain and basal ganglia are most adversely affected areas in the brain. A study done in Germany concluded that individuals who come before 10 years of age have mostly liver related symptoms, whereas those who present in the third decade have mostly neurological symptoms (2). Wilson’s disease is a progressive condition that can be fatal if left untreated. The condition is frequently misdiagnosed, and early detection is difficult. Wilson’s disease typically begins with hepatic involvement and progresses to the central nervous system later on. But in this case the neurological involvement was observed before the hepatic involvement. Tremors of head and hands were the initial symptom. There are also other case reports where the first presentation was related to the neurological system without involving the liver and the patient was over 40 years old (3),(4). Penicillamine can make things worse. This is due to the mobilisation of copper from the liver, which causes an increase in unbound copper, causing neurological symptoms to worsen. Following penicillamine medication, 30-75 percent of patients experienced initial neurological impairment, according to several studies (5),(6). Several additional reports contradicted this (7). In the present case, medication with penicillamine and anticholinergics improved the tremor. The medication, on the other hand, was responsible for the hepatic symptoms.

According to the World Health Organization, the prevalence of WD is 1:10,000-30,000 people worldwide (8). By using current genetic testing, it has now progressively risen to around 142 per million. The highest prevalence (370-885 per million) has been reported in some regions of Europe, including Romania and Sardinia, where six mutations account for 85% of the cohort (9). The frequency of a person possessing two mutant ATP7B alleles was calculated to be one in 7026 by sequencing ATP7B in 1000 control persons in the United Kingdom (10). The prevalence in Chinese han population in Anhui province is approximately 5.87 per 100,000 people (11).

Programs for newborn screening have unsatisfactory outcomes. Serum ceruloplasmin screening reveals a prevalence of 124 per million in Japanese children aged six months to nine years (12). The optimum time to diagnose the disease in children is after they turn three years old (12),(13). Community-based incidence and prevalence studies of WD don’t exist in India. In tertiary hepatobiliarycentres, WD makes upto 7.6-19.7% of juvenile liver disorders.The number of new cases of WD reported in referral neurology facilities each year ranges from 15 to 20 (13).

Clinical features of WD: This includes-

A) Hepatic manifestations (14)

• Childhood and adolescence have a higher rate of isolated hepatic involvement than adults, indicating an age-related phenotypic nature of the disease.
• Cirrhosis and portal hypertension are frequently seen in hepatic WD patients.
• Acute Liver Failure (ALF), acute hepatitis, asymptomatic hypertransaminasemia, fatty liver, cholelithiasis, and in extremely rare circumstances, hepatobiliary malignancies are among the additional hepatic WD symptoms.
• Patients with WD who present with ALF almost always have concurrent hemolysis.

B) Neuropsychiatric manifestations (15)

• The only presenting clinical symptom of WD may be neurological or neuropsychiatric symptoms.
• Hepatic form of WD typically manifests earlier than the neuropsychiatric type.
• Clinical findings may vary from mild tremors to dystonia, seizures, Parkinsonism, ataxia, cognitive abnormalities, and overt behavioral problems.
• If a child or young adult exhibits neuropsychiatric symptoms, WD screening should be taken into consideration.

C) Ocular manifestations (14),(16)

• KF rings are frequently bilateral and occur in more than 50% of neurological cases and nearly all cases of hepatic WD. A slit lamp examination is required for diagnosis.
• Although it may take years, the disappearance of KF rings frequently indicates that chelation therapy is effective.

D) Renal manifestations (14),(17)

• In WD, nephrocalcinosis (microscopic haematuria) and renal tubular failure are common.
• Proteinuria in children on Penicillamine therapy should be routinely assessed in order to detect drug-induced glomerular impairment.

E) Haematological manifestations (14),(15)

• In asymptomatic WD, mild Coombs-negative hemolytic anaemia can develop.
• The early sign of ALF linked to WD can be acute severe hemolysis.
• WD should be suspected in children and young adults with Coombs-negative hemolytic anaemia.

F) Other manifestations (14),(17)- The initial symptoms of WD may be development of arthritis. One should suspect WD if they get early-onset osteoarthritis or chondrocalcinosis in the second or third decade.

Diagnosis of WD: The most popular method for diagnosing WD is the combination of 24-hour urine copper, KF rings, and serum ceruloplasmin. The measurement of dry copper and liver biopsy have always been considered useful in ambiguous circumstances. The KF ring and extrapyramidal symptoms confirm the diagnosis of WD.

A) Serum Ceruloplasmin (18)

• A value below 10 mg/dl for ceruloplasmin significantly supports the diagnosis of WD.
• Borderline or normal results do not rule out the condition; more testing is necessary to confirm the diagnosis.
• In WD, values above the normal are rare.

B) 24 hour urinary copper (18): A baseline 24 hour level >100 mcg is a very useful diagnostic test in symptomatic patients.

C) KF rings (19)

• The KF ring is quite specific for WD, although the diagnosis is still valid in the absence of the ring.
• Patients with liver disease have a 50-60% chance of having a KF ring, whereas patients with neuropsychiatric diseases almost always have one.
• To confirm or rule out a KF ring, a skilled ophthalmologist must do a slit lamp examination.

D) Serum copper (18): Serum total copper levels are not used to make the diagnosis of WD.

E) Haemolytic anaemia (19)

• Any degree of haemolysis in the presence of Coombs-negative liver illness raises the possibility of WD.
• In a person with ALF, substantial haemolysis is usually invariably caused by WD.

F) Biopsy of Liver and concentration of copper in liver tissue (12): There are no pathognomonic histological characteristics for WD. Liver copper estimation is only marginally effective because the test is unavailable globally at many places and there are logistical and quality issues.

G) MRI brain (14): Tectal plate hyperintensity on an MRI of the brain is a pathognomonic sign of WD.

H) Family history (18): Favourable family history, and a history of sibling death in a patient with signs suggestive of WD makes its diagnosis likely.

I) Genetic studies (20): To confirm the diagnosis of WD in a patient who is suspected of having the condition, the clinical diagnostic test of ATP7B mutation analysis is indicated. Genetic testing is suggested as a clinical diagnostic test for siblings of a proband with WD, especially if the proband has an ATP7B mutation. It is not advised to routinely diagnose WD during pregnancy.

Wilson Disease Treatment Regime

Pharmacological Therapy (21),(22)

1. WD patients with hepatic symptoms need to be treated with a chelation therapy. Due to its simplicity of use, low cost, and effectiveness, D-Penicillamine (DP) is favoured.
2. Unless the patient has undergone a liver transplant, lifelong care is required.
3. DP has a number of adverse effects but is still a good chelator (23).
4. Initial monotherapy in Wilson disease shows that both D-penicillamine and zinc appear to effectively control the disease in the majority of patients. Presymptomatic patients achieve the best results with both types of therapy. Given the higher incidence of severe side effects seen in patients with hepatic and neurological presentations on D-penicillamine therapy versus zinc treatment (12.5% vs. 0.9% in our analysis), zinc appears to be preferred as the first-line treatment for presymptomatic patients (23).

Liver transplantation (24)

1. To consider a liver transplant if a patient has hepatic encephalopathy or hemolytic crises.
2. Heterozygous sibling living donor liver transplantation is effective and safe for both the donor and the recipient.
3. Transplanting the liver is not advised in cases of isolated severe neurological WD.

Monitoring on treatment (25):

1. To ascertain the positive and negative effects of the medications, careful clinical monitoring is required. Complete blood counts, urine analyses, liver function tests, 24-hour urinary copper and protein, and serum free copper levels should be examined at the start of treatment and atleast once every 6-12 months after that. KF rings must be checked yearly.

Drug therapy for neurological symptoms (26):

1. Baclofen and anticholinergics can be utilised to treat dystonia in patients who do not respond to chelation therapy. Botulinum toxin injections may be an option for people who have refractory focal dystonia or persistent dystonia.
2. Primidone, propranolol, levodopa for Parkinson’s, and tetrabenazine for hyperkinesias may all be helpful for patients with residual postural tremors.
3. Patients with neurological WD benefit from both speech and physical therapy during their rehabilitation.
4. Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are a temporary solution for patients with severe dysphagia until their condition improves with chelation therapy.

Conclusion

Wilson’s disease is a relatively uncommon genetic disease accompanied by hepatic, neurological, and ophthalmic problems. Usually, the patient presents with hepatic disease first latter there is development of neurological and other symptoms. But in the present case the patient have neurological manifestations first and after 10 years he developed hepatic disease. This case demonstrates the diagnosis of WD in the absence of congruent clinical signs. Early diagnosis and treatment can delay the onset of problems such as liver failure. Hence, WD should be kept as differential diagnosis in patients presenting with neurological symptoms so as to start the treatment early and prevent hepatic involvement.

References

1.
Patil M, Sheth KA, Krishnamurthy AC, Devarbhavi H. A review and current perspective on wilson disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology. 2013;3(4):321-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Merle U, Schaefer M, Ferenci P, Stremmel W. Clinical presentation, diagnosis and long-term outcome of Wilson’s disease: A cohort study. Gut. 2007;56:115-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Kaur H, Kaur K, Sharma N, Kumar K. Wilson’s disease- A case report. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2019;6(7):42-44. [crossref]
4.
Ferenci P, Czlonkowska A, Merie U, Ferenc S, Gromadzka G, Yurdaydin C, et al. Late onset Wilson‘s disease. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1294-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Kalita J, Kumar V, Chandra S, Kumar B, Misra UK. Worsening of Wilson disease following penicillamine therapy. Eur Neurol. 2014;71(3-4):126-31. Doi: 10.1159/000355276. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Medici V, Trevisan CP, D’Inca R, Barollo M, Zancan L, Fagiuoli S, et al. Diagnosis and management of Wilson’s disease: results of a single center experience. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:936-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Lange J. Long-term treatment of Wilson’s disease with D -penicillamine. Report on 20 cases. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1967;92:1657-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Liu J, Luan J, Zhou X, Cui Y, Han J. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of Wilson’s disease. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2017;6(4):249-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Lo C, Bandmann O. Epidemiology and introduction to the clinicalpresentation of Wilson disease. HandbClin Neurol. 2017;142:7-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Coffey AJ, Durkie M, Hague S, McLay K, Emmerson J, Lo C, et al. A genetic study of Wilson’s disease in the United Kingdom. Brain. 2013;136:1476-87. Doi: 10.1093/brain/awt035. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Hu WB, Han YZ, Xue BC, Cheng N, Sun DY, Ye DQ, et al. Epidemiological investigation of wilson disease in hanshan county. Anhui Province. Chin Med J. 2010;91:894-97.
12.
Yamaguchi Y, Aoki T, Arashima S, Ooura T, Takada G, Kitagawa T, et al. Mass screening for Wilson’s disease: Results and recommendations. Paediatrics International. 1999;41(4):405-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
13.Nagral A, Sarma MS, Matthai J, Kukkle PL, Devarbhavi H, Sinha S, et al. Wilson’s Disease: Clinical practice guidelines of the indian national association for study of the liver, the indian society of paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition, and the movement disorders society of india. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology. 2019;9(1):74-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Taly AB, Prashanth LK, Sinha S. Wilson’s disease: An Indian perspective. Neurol India. 2009;57:528-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Pandit AN, Bavdekar A, Bhave S. Wilson’s disease. Indian J Pediatr. 2002;69:785-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Kalra V, Khurana D, Mittal R. Wilson’s disease-Early onset andlessons from a paediatric cohort in India. Indian Pediatr. 2000;37:595-01.
17.
Kleine RT, Mendes R, Pugliese R, Miura I, Danesi V, Porta G, et al. Wilson’s disease: An analysis of 28 Brazilian children. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(3):231-35. Doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(03)05. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Bayes F, Karim AB, Helaly L, Bayes F, Rukunuzzaman M, Ahmed S, Alam ST. Spectrum of hepatic presentation of wilson’s disease in children attending a tertiary care centre of dhaka city. Bangladesh J Child Health. 2014 Dec. 3;38(2):86-93. [crossref]
19.
Nicastro E, Ranucci G, Vajro P, Vegnente A, Iorio R. Re-evaluation of the diagnostic criteria for Wilson disease in children with mild liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;52(6):1948-56. Doi:10.1002/hep.23910. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Schilsky ML. Non invasive testing for Wilson disease: Revisiting the d-penicillamine challenge test. J Hepatol. 2007;47:172-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Kukovertz WR, Beubler E, Kreuzig F, Moritz AJ, Nirnberger G, Werner-Breitenecker L, et al. Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of D-penicillamine. J Rheumatol. 1983;10:90-94.
22.
Wiernicka A, Janczyk W, Dadalski M. Gastrointestinal side effects in children with Wilson’s disease treated with zinc sulphate. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:4356-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Wiggelinkhuizen M, Tilanus ME, Bollen CW, Houwen RH. Systematic review: clinical efficacy of chelator agents and zinc in the initial treatment of Wilson disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:947-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Anil Dhawan, Rachel M Taylor, Paul Cheeseman, Pamela De Silva, Leah Katsiyiannakis, GiorginaMieli-Vergani, et al. Wilson’s disease in children: 37- year experience and revised King’s score for liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:441-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Guillaud O, Dumortier J, Sobesky R, Debray D, Wolf P, Vanlemmens C, et al. Long-term results of liver transplantation for Wilson’s disease: Experience in France. J Hepatol. 2014;60:579-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Murillo O, Luqui DM, Gazque ZC, Martinez-Espartosa D, Iñigo Navarro-Blasco, Jose Ignacio Monreal, et al. Long-term metabolic correction of Wilson’s disease in a murine model by gene therapy. J Hepatol. 2016;64:419-26. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58489.17316

Date of Submission: Jun 16, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 25, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 17, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 30, 2022
• Manual Googling: Nov 11, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 15 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com