Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 24558

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : January | Volume : 17 | Issue : 1 | Page : JC01 - JC06 Full Version

Implementation of Competency Based Medical Education Curriculum in Paediatrics for Phase 2 MBBS Undergraduates- A Descriptive Study


Published: January 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/57002.17257
S Revathy, V Sandhya, R Prabhavathi, Chejety Rakesh Reddy, M Govindaraj

1. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Assisstant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Assisstant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 5. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
R Prabhavathi,
706, Favourite Elegance Apartments, Near Ambedkar Medical College, Bengaluru-560032, Karnataka.
E-mail: drprabha81@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Adoption of Competency Based Medical Education-Undergraduate (CBME-UG) curriculum is made mandatory in medical colleges by National Medical Commission (NMC). CBME-UG curriculum enumerates the expected knowledge and skills in detail and it focuses more on observable outcomes that are important in day-to day medical practice. This curriculum holds the teacher as well as learner equally responsible in running the educational programme.

Aim: To put forth the approach adopted in implementation of CBME-UG curriculum for phase 2 MBBS students in paediatric subject.

Materials and Methods: This article describes the steps applied in transforming the traditional structured teaching method to the CBME method for undergraduate phase 2 MBBS students in the Department of Paediatrics at Dr. B R Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, during January 2021 to December 2021. The duration of one year was divided into preimplementation phase (three months) and implementation phase (nine months). The faculty of the department, a coordinator to overview the programmeme, the postgraduate residents, and the students of phase 2 MBBS were the stakeholders identified in order to run the CBME-UG educational programmeme.

Results: Preimplementation phase consisted of designing the department module and sensitisation of involved stakeholders. The contents of the module were curriculum planner for three years, time-table plan for phase II MBBS students, structuring of teaching sessions, designing the assessment method, and designing the feedback method. Implementation phase during clinical postings for the phase II MBBS students incorporated the strategies designed in preimplementation phase. The teaching sessions, assessment, the feedback sessions, and student-doctor programmeme were implemented with realistic and feasible planning.

Conclusion: The CBME curriculum was successfully implemented among undergraduate second year medical students in term of student feedback and performance. It was noted that appropriate planning and sensitisation of students as well as the teachers, helped in running the programme smoothly.

Keywords

Student feedback, Teaching module, Educational programme

Medical education in India was centered more around time-bound learning approach, didactic lecture teaching methods and there was less of patient based learning (1). Introduction of Competency Based Medical Education (CBME) in India will in contrast increase the focus of medical education on patient outcome, de-emphasise time based learning and emphasise on being learner centered. The CBME curriculum enumerates the expected knowledge and skills in detail and it focuses more on observable outcomes that are important in day to day medical practice. This curriculum holds the teacher as well as learner equally responsible in running the educational programme (1).

Adoption of Competency Based Medical Education Undergraduate (CBME-UG) curriculum is made mandatory in medical colleges by National Medical Commission (NMC). An Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA) is a unit of professional work that the Indian medical graduate should be able to execute unsupervised (2). Competencies designed by the NMC (for CBME-UG subject wise) comprise of components such as knowledge, skills and attitudes which are necessary to ensure that every Indian medical graduate has completed the expected EPA’s. In view of increasing violence and medico-legal allegations against doctors it is important to work on these aspects of ensuring quality of medical education. Several Indian articles have emphasised on importance of transformation to CBME and possible hurdles that will be encountered during this transformation (2),(3). Need for this change was foreseen even a decade ago by Singh T et al., as stated in a study conducted by them to identify as to which pedagogic themes should be incorporated under faculty development programmemes in India (4). Also, few studies have stressed on need for a module to successfully implement CBME programmeme in an institute (5),(6),(7).

This article highlights the on-field application of the instructions provided by Medical Council of India (MCI) for implementation of CBME-UG curriculum (8). It discusses how department learning module can be developed to implement the CBME-UG curriculum in each department and importance of identification of stakeholders involved in this educational programmeme along with early sensitization of these stakeholders about their responsibilities in this transformation. It also lays emphasis on sequencing the milestones over three years in form of curriculum planner for the learner to achieve the expected competencies. Hence, present study aimed to describe the steps applied in transforming the traditional structured teaching method to the CBME method for undergraduate phase 2 MBBS students in the Department of Paediatrics.

Material and Methods

This descriptive study was conducted to describe the steps applied in transforming the traditional structured teaching method to the CBME method for UG phase 2 MBBS students in the Department of Paediatrics, Dr BR Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India, during January 2021 to December 2021. No ethical issues involved in this educational programme.

The methodology was framed adopting the recommendations provided in one of the articles describing the design and implementation of the competency based medical education training programme for medical oncology residents in Canada (9). Incorporating the recommendations, the duration of one year, January 2021 to December 2021 was divided with pre implementation of phase three months and implementation phase of nine months.

Preimplementation phase: It focused on recognisation and early engagement of the stakeholders to run this educational programme. Stakeholders being faculty of Department of Paediatrics (eight), a Department Co-ordinator to overview the programme, postgraduate residence in the Department (five) and the students of phase 2 MBBS (n=91). Selection of competencies and categorisation of them under different phases was important part of framing learning module. Developing teaching, assessment and feedback systems that is realistic and practical was also important focus of Preimplementation phase.

Implementation phase: It was during the period when the students were posted in batches for clinical postings: duration of postings was two weeks for each batch.

Results

I) Preimplementation phase

This consisted of developing department module and sensitisation of the stakeholders.

A. Developing department module

Following are contents incorporated in the module:

a) Curriculum planner for 3 year: As per the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences ( the study institute is affiliated to this university) timetable (10), the students attend the clinical postings of two weeks in MBBS 2nd year (phase 2), three weeks in MBBS 3rd year (phase 3 part 1) and eight weeks in MBBS final year ( phase 3 part 2). The lectures (40 hours), and small group discussion sessions (64 hours i.e 32 hours sessions) are divided among the phase 3 part 1 and phase 3 part 2 academic years. (Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3) shows the curriculum planner developed in the department module for the three years based on allotted hours of clinical posting and theory for the subject of paediatrics.

b) Timetable for phase 2 MBB S students: Total of 91 students reported for the clinical posting, and were grouped into six batches (out of 100, 91 students were eligible to enter phase 2 after phase 1 exams). Each batch attended two weeks of clinical posting (10 effective days). Following was the timetable framed for them:

Day 1-Overview of growth in children
Day 2-Developmental milestones
Day 3-Complementary feeding and dietary history
Day 4-Breastfeeding
Day 5-Immunisation
Day 6-Normal newborn care
Day 7-Vital signs in paediatrics
Day 8-Paediatrics case sheet writing
Day 9-Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) internal assessment and feedback
Day 10-Repeat assessment for students who have not passed the examination previous day.

Signing log books; checking of student doctor programmeme performance.

Students were informed to do self-directed learning on the topic-Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) and dietary sources of all vitamins’ on day1 of clinical postings. Paediatrics topics for Self Directed Learning (SDL) were chosen from the list of competencies given by NMC. The students were provided with list of reliable sources (textbooks and articles) from which they could read and understand the topic. These topics were assessed as one of stations in OSCE assessment.

c) Structuring of teaching sessions planned for MBB S 2nd year (phase 2) students: During the two weeks of clinical posting, the duration of three hours in each session was divided into four parts.

• Introductory lecture was taken to improve the students’ knowledge about the topic planned for the day (cognitive domain)
• Demonstration of psychomotor domain (history elicitation, bedside skills, procedural skills) and affective domain (counselling skills) by the teachers and observation by students.
• Assisting students perform the above psychomotor and affective domain skills on real patients or under stimulated environment.
• Verbal feedback by the teacher to the student about their performance.

d) Designing assessment method for phase 2 MBB S (11),(12),(13): When designing the assessment method for the above-mentioned phase 2 MBBS syllabus, the following were taken into consideration:

• Certifiable skills, during assessment.
• Selection of other observable skills which need direct observation during assessment.
• Using assessment elements that are easy to use in the workplace with the available resources i.e. patients, simulations (11), available time, infrastructure, number of faculty available for the assessment.

Hence,
OSCE was considered to be an ideal method for assessment (14)

e) Designing the feedback systems (2),(15): Feedback systems were designed considering following requirements:

• Bidirectional feedback
• Needs to be on-going process starts from first step of learning to attaining the competence (14).
• Well timed feedback soon after learning activity which will help the learner to initiate remedial measures as the learning event is still fresh in their mind (14).
• Feedback to be given in an objective manner, rather than being subjective or judgemental (14).

Incorporating the above requirements two levels of feedback systems were designed:

Teacher to Learner-Verbal feedback based on first hand observation during teaching and assessment.

Learner to Teacher-feedback documented as Google forms designed by senior faculty.

(Associate Professor in Department of Paediatrics)

B) Sensitisation of the involved stakeholders (6):

Teachers have undergone faculty development programmeme conducted in this institution.

• Meeting was conducted to sensitise the teachers about how this new educational programmeme helps in the implementation. Here is an example on how to put forth the planner in such a department meeting [pdf-1].
• Both learners and teachers were sensitised that achieving the targeted competency is on-going process which is spanned over three learning years. Here is the example of sample framework to achieve the competency which was used to sensitise the stakeholders how the curriculum works (Table/Fig 4).

The learners were sensitised to use logbook and maintain the documentation periodically, the use of reflection section by learners is equally important in improving their skills.

II) Implementation

a. Teaching sessions: Immunisation session implementation, (Table/Fig 5) shows how the preimplementation plan had been applied during the teaching session.

b. Assessment- the content of OSCE is depicted in (Table/Fig 6). Ten OSCE stations were prepared for the assessment. Exam was conducted in batches of approximately 15 students. Total 81, out of 91 students took the OSCE. Each student was given the same scenario.

Example Task: A 4-year-old female child was brought by the mother-Elicit the developmental history and demonstrate the developmental milestones (this child with parent was available in OSCE station and the student reads the task and performs what is required).

Examiner was provided with the checklist used to evaluate the student objectively (Table/Fig 7).

The mean score for this station (OSCE station 7) of one of the batches (14 students ) was 4.1. mean scores for OSCE stations 1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,10 were 3.5, 2.3, 3.0, 4.2, 3.76, 3.46, 3.1, 3.9, 3.4, respectively.

c. Feedback: Teacher to student-Incorporating the preimplementation requirements, verbal feedback at each level from learning to attaining the competency was as implemented (Table/Fig 8).

Student to teacher-Google feedback form was given to the students to know their feedback about the teaching sessions and assessments [pdf-2].

The responses were enclosed [Excel sheet 1].

d. Students Doctor programme: This is a new concept introduced by NMC for CBME curriculum. The goal of learner doctor programmeme is to provide learners with experience of longitudinal patient care, being a part of healthcare system and hands-on care of patients in Outpatient Department (OPD) and Inpatient Department (IPD) setting. Focuses of learner doctor method in phase 2 are: History taking, physical examination, assessment of change in clinical status, communication and patient education.

During the implementation of this programmeme for phase-2 students, a checklist was prepared as per the guidelines given by NMC [pdf-3] (8). Each student was assigned a patient during their clinical posting in paediatrics. They were explained about the programmeme and were instructed to complete the requirements of checklist given to them. At the end of their posting, logbook was checked by the designated faculty for its completeness and quality of report on the patient assigned. Verbal feedback was given to students regarding the same.

Discussion

The present study explains necessary steps to be taken to do feasible implementation rather than just an on-paper protocol. Prior understanding of limitations and strengths at institutional level will help in proper strategy framing and implementation of CBME undergraduate curriculum. Developing curriculum planner subject wise becomes important to ensure that all competencies in curriculum are covered and that clinical postings and skill lab postings rotation align with the competencies requiring direct observation (9). Sequencing the 398 Specific Learning Objectives (SLO) in a more meaningful way to take the Indian medical graduate through hierarchical manner of learning-understanding interpretation and application.

Competency based undergraduate curriculum is a learner centred approach. It gives greater flexibility for students to attain the competencies at their pace. Teaching and learning becomes a more accountable process when compared to traditional methods. A cross-sectional descriptive study involving students from 74 colleges across India was conducted to assess learners’ perspective of the newer curriculum components in the phase 1 MBBS. This study showed nearly 75% students felt that the concepts of early clinical exposure, foundation course, attitude ethics and communication sessions were useful, hence proving that this new innovation is most welcome by the students (16).

Though, many curriculum implementation support programmemes and medical education technology teaching programmemes have been conducted nationwide, there are still no uniform guidelines on how to practically apply the SLO’s to teaching the long spanned subjects like paediatrics, obstetrics and gynaecology, medicine and surgery. Faculty development is also at premature stage as most of medical faculty still do not prioritise curriculum planning (4),(17),(18). Hence, designing and implementation is a lot cumbersome and time consuming process. The teaching session design described in this article is alomst comparable to Gagne’s instructional design in applying theory to teaching practice The gagne’s nine events of instructions includes 1) gaining attention of listeners 2) informing the learner of the objective 3) stimulating recall of prerequisite learning 4) presenting the stimulus 5) providing learning guidance 6) eliciting the performance 7) providing feedback about performance corrections 8) assessing the performance and 9) enhancing retention and transfer (15).

The postgraduate residents were also involved in conducting these interactive sessions. Prior discussion them about the session planning and involving them in process of teaching enhanced the self-esteem of our postgraduate residents (19) Formal training of residents in teaching CBME-UG (20) curriculum, will provide more effective manpower in managing the classes (10). Each paediatrics unit must consist of one professor, one associate professor, two assistant professors and three senior residents in order to effectively continue the CBME teaching along with patient care. There is a need for recruiting academic advisors in each department to guide the faculty and the learner through this CBME programmeme and ensure its consistent functioning (15). Newer methods of teaching such as small group discussion, clinical videos and case scenario based discussion, demonstration of affective and psychomotor skills bedside or under simulated atmosphere and self-directed learning make knowledge application more appreciable and learner centered. Components of CBME such as, self directed learning and student doctor programme, shift the responsibility of learningfrom the teachers to the students. Formative assessment methods are more powerful tools because they direct the students’ learning efforts towards learning outcomes at the level of understanding, interpretation and application which are always retained longer and have greater transfer value at workplace (1),(2),(21),(22).

Limitation(s)

Lack of alignment and integration in the above conducted teaching programmeme was a drawback. Though, the concept of alignment and integration is one of the main focus of CBME, its initiation requires preparedness of all the individual departments.

Conclusion

Competency based medical education-undergraduate curriculum implementation was successful in term of student feedback and performance. It was noted that appropriate planning and sensitisation of students as well as the teachers, helped in running the programme smoothly. The department module which was developed, aided in the thorough understanding of the strengths and limitations in running the CBME programme for the undergraduates. Strengthening of feedback systems through proper validation and reliability checks is also the need of the hour. Further, research must be carried out to identify tools which can be used to continuously evaluate the effectiveness of implementation. This will facilitate the incorporation necessary changes in response to real time challenges.

Acknowledgement

Authors are grateful to all the department faculty members and postgraduate residents whose cooperation have made this curriculum implementation a success.

References

1.
Sood R, Singh T. Assessment in medical education: Evolving perspectives and contemporary trends. Natl Med J India. 2012;25(6):357-64. [crossref]
2.
Modi JN, Gupta P, Singh T. Competency-based medical education, entrustment and assessment. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52(5):413-20. Available from: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-015-0647-5. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Kulkarni P, Pushpalatha K, Bhat D. Medical education in India: Past, present, and future. APIK J Int Med. 2019;7(3):69. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ ajim.ajim_13_19. [crossref]
4.
Singh T, Moust J, Wolfhagen I. Needs and priorities of faculty development for medical teachers in India: a Delphi study. Natl Med J India. 2010;23(5):297-301.
5.
Shrivastava S, Shrivastava P. How to successfully implement competency-based medical education in India. Educ Health Prof. 2018;1(2):61-63. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ehp.ehp_20_18. [crossref]
6.
Shrivastava S, Shrivastava P, Ramasamy J. Development of a module to successfully implement competency-based medical education program in an institute. Muller J Med Sci Res. 2018;9(1):27. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.4103/mjmsr.mjmsr_50_17. [crossref]
7.
Singh K, Rathie N, Jain P. Competency-Based Medical Education for The Indian Medical Graduate: Implementation & Assessment in Ophthalmology. DJO 2022;32:112-118. [crossref]
8.
[Internet] UG curriculum. Org.in. [cited 2022 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www. nmc.org.in/information-desk/for-colleges/ug-curriculum/.
9.
Hsu T, De Angelis F, Al-asaaed S, Basi SK, Tomiak A, Grenier D, et al. Ten ways to get a grip on designing and implementing a competency-based medical education training program. Can Med Educ J. 2021;12(2):e81-e87. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.36834/cmej.70723. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Timetable Template for MBBS PHASE III PART I As per Competency-Based Medical Education Curriculum [Internet]. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences Karnataka, Karnataka. 2021 [cited 2022Jan21]. Available from: http:// www.rguhs.ac.in/index.html.
11.
Org.in. [cited 2022 Jul 30]. Available from: https://www.nmc.org.in/wp-content/ uploads/2020/08/Module_Competence_based_02.09.2019.pdf.
12.
Lobo J, Sood R, Paul VK, Sahni P, Mittal S, Kharbanda OP, et al. The Viva-Voce Examination. In: Assessment in medical education: Trends and tools. New Delhi; 1995. p. 172-81.
13.
Schuwirth L, Van Der Vleuten C. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, theory, and Practice. Swanwick T, Forrest K, editors. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2019.
14.
Chacko TV. Giving feedback in the new CBME curriculum paradigm: Principles, models and situations where feedback can be given. J Educ Technol Health Sci. 2022;8(3):76-82. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.18231/j.jeths.2021.016. [crossref]
15.
Snell L, Son D, Onishi H. Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, theory, and Practice. Swanwick T, Forrest K, editors. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2019.
16.
Ramanathan R, Shanmugam J, Gopalakrishna SM, Palanisami K, Narayanan S. Exploring the learners’ perspectives on competency-based medical education. J Educ Health Promot [Internet]. 2021;10:109. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_866_20.
17.
Basheer A. Competency-based medical education in India: Are we ready? J Curr Res Sci Med. 2019;5(1):01-03. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcrsm. jcrsm_18_19. [crossref]
18.
Deswal B, Singhal V. Problems of medical education in India. Int J Community Med Public Health 2016;3(7):1905-9. Available from: http://dx.doi. org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20162063. [crossref]
19.
Mahajan R, Gupta P, Singh T. Training-module for residents in medical educational technologies (TRIM): Need and operational strategies. Indian Pediatr. 2020;57(10):944-49. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312-020-2000-x [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Kapoor A, Kapoor A, Badyal DK. Simulated patients for competency-based undergraduate medical education post COVID-19: A new normal in India. Indian Pediatr. 2021;58(9):881-87. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13312- 021-2312-5. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Mittal S, Sood R; Sood R, Paul VK, Sahni P, Mittal S, et al. Objective Structured Clinical Examination. In: Assessment in medical education: Trends and tools. New Delhi; 1995. p. 108-37.
22.
Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, Swing SR, Frank JR. The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):676-82. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.500704. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/57002.17257

Date of Submission: Apr 09, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 25, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Sep 26, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 13, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jul 28, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Sep 23, 2022 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com