Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 20990

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : January | Volume : 17 | Issue : 1 | Page : MC10 - MC14 Full Version

Association of Preoperative Audiological and Radiological Ossicular Findings with Peroperative Findings in Patients with Chronic Otitis Media- A Prospective Clinical Study


Published: January 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58221.17399
Sagar Jani, Pushkar Khare, Sanjay Kumar, Bhavya Khatri

1. Junior Resident, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Subharti University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Subharti University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Subharti University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Intern, Subharti University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sagar Jani,
Subharti University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: jani60032@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic Otitis Media (COM) refers to a chronic infection of mucosa lining the middle ear cleft and is the leading cause of conductive hearing loss in adults. The erosion or disruption of ossicular chain is determined while during the surgery. Complete disruption of ossicular chain can lead up to 60 dB hearing loss. Preoperative High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) scan of temporal bone can give a clue of ossicular integrity.

Aim: To determine the association of preoperative audiological and radiological findings with the peroperative findings in cases of chronic otitis media.

Material and Methods: This prospective clinical study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at Subharti Medical College and associated Chhatrapati Shivaji Subharti Hospital, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India, from October 2019 to August 2021. Seventy five patients of unilateral uncomplicated chronic otitis media (mucosal or squamosal), with conductive hearing loss, aged between 10 to 50 years were included in the study. Audiological assessment was done in form of pure tone audiometry using Alps 2100 instrument to measure hearing loss in decibels (dB). Radiological assessment was done using bilateral X-ray mastoid Schuller’s view, and HRCT temporal bone. Association of audiological and radiological findings was determined with intraoperative findings using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0.

Results: The mean age of the study population was found to be 26.34±9.14 years. Females 42 (56%) were found to be affected more than males 33 (44%). Significant association was found between severity of hearing loss and necrosed ossicles seen peroperatively as p-value <0.05 in mucosal type of CSOM. Chances of peroperative ossicular necrosis (mucosal) were more in sclerosed (76.47%) and diploic (84.61%) mastoid as compared to pneumatized mastoid (7.69%) with statistically significant difference as p-value<0.01. Maximum accuracy of reporting for HRCT was found for the involvement of part of Incus.

Conclusion: There was a significant association of audiological findings and number of ossicles necrosed peroperatively. hence, it can be concluded that greater the degree of hearing loss, more the chances of ossicular necrosis peroperatively.

Keywords

Conductive hearing loss, Ossicles, Pure tone audiometry, Temporal bone

Chronic Otitis Media (COM) refers to a chronic infection of mucosa lining the middle ear cleft, which includes the middle ear, attic, aditus, antrum, mastoid air cells and eustachian tube (1). The Browning pathological classification of COM broadly divides COM into mucosal and squamousal subtypes (2). It has been further subdivided into active and inactive forms. This classification is now more accepted than the former one comprising tubotympanic or safe Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) and atticoantral or unsafe CSOM, which were defined as “intermittent or persistent, chronic purulent drainage through a perforated tympanic membrane, which can be associated with cholesteatoma.” in developing countries like India incidence of CSOM varies from 3-57% while in developing countries it varies from 0.5-2% (3). In India, incidence of CSOM is up to 30% with prevalence rate of 15 and 46 per 1,000 population respectively in urban and rural areas (3).

Chronic suppurative otitis media is the leading cause of conductive hearing loss in adults, which is secondary to damage of the eardrum and middle ear ossicles induced by chronic inflammation, occuring in approximately one third of CSOM cases. It may lead to total failure of middle ear mechanics, resulting in substantial hearing loss (4). Malleus, incus and stapes along with tympanic membrane are vital for impedance matching mechanism of the middle ear. Necrosis of long process of the incus, suprastructure of stapes, body of incus and manubrium occur in decreasing order of frequency, respectively (5).

Erosion is a result of non-specific hyperemia associated with mucosal inflammation, with ossicular chain being the predominant site for bone resorption and damage (6). Various factors that are known to contribute in bone erosion in cholesteatoma are-osteoclasts, pressure necrosis, collagenolytic enzyme, Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α, lysosomal enzymes, and non lysosomal enzymes calpain I and II, leading to hypervascularization, osteoclast activation and bone resorption and ossicular damage (7),(8),(9).

Erosion or discontinuity of the ossicular chain is confirmed only during surgery. Preoperative High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) scan of temporal bone can give a clue of ossicular integrity. However, it’s high-cost and degree of radiation exposure limits its use in developing countries like India especially in cases of mucosal type of CSOM. Preoperative knowledge of ossicular discontinuity is important because it enables the surgeon to discuss with the patient the possible outcome of surgery and take the consent accordingly (5).

Complete disruption of the ossicular chain can result in a 60 dB hearing loss (10),(11). Hence, knowledge of the risk factors causing ossicular necrosis and the different pattern of ossicular involvement would be helpful to plan the ossicular surgery. Previous studies (5),(9) do not focus on association of preoperative audiological and radiological findings with preoperative ossicular necrosis. Association between these findings is a direct indicator of how much useful these investigations are in current times to plan the surgeries before hand by giving a clear idea of the types and number of ossicles involved to the treating surgeon. Hence, present study was conducted to determine the association between preoperative audiological and radiological findings with peroperative ossicular chain involvement in both mucosal and squamosal type of chronic otitis media.

Material and Methods

The present prospective clinical study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at Subharti Medical College and associated Chhatrapati Shivaji Subharti Hospital, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India, from October 2019 to August 2021. Written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants for inclusion in the study.

Inclusion criteria: Patients with pure conductive hearing loss, aged between 10 to 50 years, having unilateral, mucosal or squamousal type of chronic otitis media and who were scheduled to undergo ear surgery were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL), age less than 10 years and more than 50 years, with complications of COM, B/L chronic otitis media and patients with previously operated ear/trauma were excluded.

Sample size calculation: With confidence interval of 95% (z=1.96), considering incidence of CSOM as 15% (p=0.15) in urban city of Meerut (3), and precision of 8% (e=0.08), sample size was found to be 75, the calculation for which is as follows

Prevalence(p)=0.15, hence q=1-0.15=0.85; level of precision (e=0.08); critical value of confidence level (z)=1.96-+ So, ~75

Thus, a total of 75 patients were taken in the study, who were clinically diagnosed as cases of chronic otitis media (mucosal or squamosal type) and later operated.

Data collection: Patients clinically diagnosed as cases of unilateral chronic otitis media were included in the study. A detailed evaluation of the middle ear by otoscopy was done and classification of type of COM was performed according to the Browning classification (2). according to the classification patients were divided in mucosal and submucosal type COM. Demographic data such as age, gender, socioeconomic status were collected from all the participants. Modified Kuppuswamy Scale (12) was used to determine the socio-economic status of the study participants.

All the patients underwent audiological assessment in the form of pure tone audiometry to measure the associated hearing loss in decibels (dB). Radiological assessment was done using bilateral X-ray mastoid Schuller’s view (Table/Fig 1), and HRCT temporal bone.

Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA): The PTA was done using Alps 2100. Test was done in acoustically treated room. Both air and bone conduction were tested. For assessing the hearing loss, pure tone average was calculated by taking the average of the hearing threshold level at 500 Hz, 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz only. PTA was done so as to find the type and degree of hearing loss and to exclude the patient having Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL). Degree of deafness was graded according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification, 1980 (2):

• Normal hearing: 0 to 25 dB
• Mild deafness: 26 to 40 dB
• Moderate deafness: 41 to 55 dB
• Moderately severe deafness: 56 to 70 dB
• Severe deafness: 71 to 90 dB
• Profound deafness: Above 90 dB

HRCT temporal bone: Was done in all 19 patients having squamosal type of chronic otitis media and in 32 patients out 56 having mucosal type of disease based on PTA findings who were having moderate and moderately severe conductive hearing loss to see the ossicular status of affected ear (Table/Fig 2).

Surgical procedure such as cortical mastoidectomy, modified radical mastoidectomy were performed in all the patients (Table/Fig 3). Association of preoperative audiological and radiological findings was determined with intraoperative findings in terms of ossicular chain continuity and ossicular necrosis.

Statistical Analysis

Data was collected and entered in excel sheet. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 was used to do the statistical analysis. The test used to determine the significance of association was Chi-square with 95% confidence interval, considered significant with p-value<0.05.

Results

In the present study, the mean age of the study population was found to be 26.34±9.14 years. Maximum number of patients were found in the age group of 21-30 years i.e. 38 (50.6%) followed by 10-20 years i.e. 18 (24%). out of 75 patients, 33 (44%) were males and 42 (56%) were females. Majority of the patients i.e. 36 (48%) were belonged to upper lower class followed by 18 (24%) in lower class (Table/Fig 4).

In the present study, out of total 75 patients, 56 (74.67%) were diagnosed as cases of mucosal type of CSOM, and 19 (25.33%) as squamosal type of CSOM.

Mild conductive hearing loss was seen in 24 patients out of which three patients (12.5%) had ossicular necrosis peroperatively, moderate conductive hearing loss was seen in 25 patients out of which 16 patients (64%) had ossicular necrosis, moderately severe deafness was seen in seven patients and all seven patients (100%) had ossicular necrosis peroperatively. Significant association was found between severity of hearing loss and necrosed ossicles seen peroperatively (p-value<0.01) (Table/Fig 5).

In presenst study, moderately severe conductive hearing loss was seen in 10 patients out of which all 10 patients (100%) had ossicles necrosed peroperatively, moderate conductive deafness was seen nine patients out of which all nine patients had ossicles necrosed peroperatively (Table/Fig 6).

Pneumatisation of mastoid was seen in 26 out of 56 patients out of which two patients (7.69%) had necrosed ossicles peroperatively. 17 out of 56 patients had sclerosed mastoid out of which 13 patients (76.47%) had peroperative ossicular necrosis. 13 out of 56 patients had diploic mastoid out of which, 11 (84.61%) patients had peroperative ossicular necrosis. Chances of peroperative ossicular necrosis (mucosal) was more in sclerosed and diploic mastoid as compared to pneumatisation of mastoid with statistically significant difference as p-value<0.01 (Table/Fig 7).

In present study it was found that out of 19 patients; all the 19 patients had ossicular necrosis peroperatively. Fourteen out of 19 patients had sclerosed mastoid out of which all 14 patients had peroperative ossicular necrosis. Five out of 19 patients had diploic mastoid out of which all five patients had peroperative ossicular necrosis (Table/Fig 8).

The HRCT was done in 32 out of 56 patients with MUCOSAL type of disease (excluding the cases associated with mild hearing loss), in which 17 patients showed normal ossicular status, and 15 cases showed ossicular necrosis on HRCT (Table/Fig 2). On observing the peroperative findings with HRCT, total false positives were found to be two, and false negatives to be 13. Sensitivity was found to be 100% in involvement of Incus, both malleus and Incus, and in involvement of both incus and stapes suprastructure. Maximum accuracy of reporting for HRCT was found for the involvement of part of incus (Table/Fig 9).

The HRCT was done in all the 19 patients with squamosal type of disease, out of which 17 cases showed ossicular necrosis on HRCT. On observing the peroperative findings with HRCT, total false negatives were found to be two. No false positives were found. 100% sensitivity was reported when either, both malleus and incus were involved or, both incus and stapes suprastructure were involved. 100% specificity was reported in the involvement of any part of Incus. Maximum accuracy was reported for involvement of long process of incus, and when both incus and stapes suprastrucure were involved (Table/Fig 10).

Discussion

Ossicular necrosis more commonly occurs in finely constructed parts of the chain, mainly at long process of incus and stapes superstructure where osteoclastic activity is abundant as compared to weak osteoblastic activity. The ability to predict the presence of ossicular discontinuity in such patient using certain preoperative factors, would be of benefit in allowing the surgeon to plan ahead with regard to the need for an ossiculoplasty and also to give the patient a realistic explanation of the expected outcome (13).

Audiological assessment was done of all the patients, and it was found that 24 patients (32%) had mild hearing loss, 34 patients (45.33%) had moderate degree of hearing loss and rest 17 patients (22.67%) had moderately severe hearing loss. In case of mucosal disease; mild conductive hearing loss was seen in 24 patients out of which three patients (12.5%) had ossicular necrosis peroperatively, moderate conductive hearing loss was seen in 25 patients out of which 16 patients (64%) had ossicular necrosis, moderately severe deafness was seen in seven patients and all seven patients (100%) had ossicular necrosis peroperatively. In case of squamosal disease; moderately severe conductive hearing loss was seen in 10 patients out of which all. Ten patients (100%) had ossicles necrosed peroperatively, moderate conductive deafness was seen in nine patients out of which all nine patients had ossicles necrosed per operatively. Shinta N et al., in their study found that hearing loss moderate to severe degree was found in this study of 29.3%, followed by moderate degree as much as 24.6%, severe degree as much as 20.0%, profound degree as much as 13.8% and mild degree as much as 12.3%. Sharma M et al., (15) in their study showed that the most common type of hearing loss encountered was mild followed by moderate. When incus was necrosed, hearing loss was mainly moderate type and with stapes necrosis, profound or moderately severe type (15).

The possible reason for majority of patients presenting with moderate and moderately severe hearing loss in the present study is that most of the patients in our country come relatively late in hospital for treatment when the disease has already advanced.

On investigating the 56 patients of mucosal type with X-ray mastoid, it was reported that 26 patients (46.24%) of them had pneumatic changes in the mastoid and mastoid antrum. Sclerotic changes were seen in 17 patients (30.35%) and diploic changes in 13 patients (23.21%). X-ray mastoid Schuller’s view of 14 squamosal patients (73.68%) showed sclerotic changes and five patients (26.31%) showed diploic changes. These are comparable with findings of Mahesh HC et al., (16) and Gans HK et al., (17). They stated that sclerotisation of mastoid process is neither hereditary nor congenital, nor sequelae of otitis media in infancy, but is a result of the suppurative process, representing a defense mechanism consisting in growth of bone which displaces the pathologic process towards the antrum.

Out of 32 patients (mucosal), 17 patients had Normal HRCT findings. In 15 patients HRCT showed Ossicular destruction out of which in 10 patients (31.25%) incus was involved, In one patient (3.12%) both malleus and incus were involved and in four patients (12.55%) incus and stapes suprastructure were involved. HRCT was done in all 19 cases of squamosal disease. In majority i.e. in 11 patients (57.89%) both incus and stapes suprastructure were involved, followed by involvement of only incus in two patients (10.52%), and both malleus and incus were involved in four patients (21.09%). The long process incus was an ossicle that has a long and hanging structure, a location in mesotympanum, as well as rare vascularization so susceptible to destruction. Shinta N et al., (14) in their study reported that incus was found to be in most destructed condition which is similar to our study. Stapes was obtained most intact condition as much as 50.8%. This is in accordance to the study done by Sunita M et al., (18), where, in a total of 31 cases of tubotympanic type of CSOM, the ossicular destruction was detected by the HRCT temporal bone was more common in incus (three cases, 9.7%), followed by stapes (two cases, 6.5%) in actively discharging tubotympanic type of CSOM. No case showed erosion of the malleus bone. Rawat V et al., (19) also did a similar study, where HRCT correlation of ossicular necrosis was done in 41 patients of COM (TTD/mucosal type) and 59 patients of COM (AAD/squamosal type). Out of the 41 patients, on HRCT temporal bone, majority had erosion of handle of malleus 44% followed by erosion of incus seen in 41% as they were the most commonly eroded bone in COM. There was no erosion of head of the malleus and stapes suprastructure.

Limitation(s)

The present study was conducted on a limited sample size, taken from one hospital. Audiological assessment to measure hearing loss in this study was done using Pure Tone Audiometer (ALPS - AD2100). Advance methods (impedance audiometry, auto acoustic impedance) of audiologcal assessment using newer models of audiometers have emerged in market today.

Conclusion

The present study concludes that in both mucosal and squamosal type of CSOM there was significant association in between audiological findings and number of ossicles necrosed seen peroperatively hence, greater the degree of hearing loss, more the chances of ossicular necrosis peroperatively. Chances of Peroperative ossicular necrosis (mucosal) is more in sclerosed and diploic mastoid as compared to pneumatization of mastoid. High resolution computed tomography is a reliable and specific investigation with a good accuracy rate to detect ossicular necrosis. Future studies should be conducted with larger sample size, taken from different geographical locations.

References

1.
Gopen Q. Pathology and clinical course of the inflammatory diseases of the middle ear. In: Gulya AJ, Minor LB, Poe DS, editors. 6th ed. USA Shelton: Connecticut: Peoples Med Publishing House. 2010;425-36.
2.
Browning GG, Saumil N Merchant, Gerad Kelly, Iian RC Swan, Richard Canter, William S Mckerrow, et al. Chronic otitis media. In: Gleeson M, Browning GG, Burton MJ, Clarke R, Hibbert J, Jones NS, et al., editors. Scott-Brown’s Otolaryngol, Head Neck surg. Vol. 3. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd. 2008;3395-45. [crossref]
3.
Sharma K, Manjari M, Salaria N. Middle ear cleft in chronic otitis media: a clinicohistopathological study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(Suppl 3):493-97. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Haidar H, Sheikh R, Larem A, Elsaadi A, Abdulkarim H, Ashkanani S, et al. Ossicular chain erosion in chronic suppurativeotitis media. Otolaryngology. 2015;5:203.
5.
Harkare VV, Khadakkar SP, Deosthale NV. Study of preoperative indicators of ossicular defect in mucosal type of chronic suppurative otitis media. J Evolution Med Dent Sci. 2020;9(09):668-72. [crossref]
6.
Chole RA. Cellular and subcellular events in bone resorption in human and experimental cholesteatoma: the role of osteoclasts. Laryngoscope. 1984;94:76-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Chole RA, McGinn MD, Tinling SP. Pressure induced bone resorption in the middle ear. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1985;94:165-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Abramson M. Collagenase activity in middle ear cholesteatoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1969;78:112-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Amar MS, Wishahi HF, Zakhary MM. Clinical and biochemical studies of bone destruction in cholesteatoma. J Laryngol Otol. 1996;110:534-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Bojrab DI, Balough BJ. Surgical anatomy of the temporal bone and dissection guide. In: Glasscock ME, Gulya AJ (eds) Glasscock-Shambaugh surgery of the ear, 5th edn. Reed ElsevierIndia Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi. 2003;778.
11.
Merchant SN, Rosowski JJ. Auditory physiology. In:Glasscock ME, Gulya AJ (eds) Surgery of the ear, 5th edn. ReedElsevier India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi. 2003;70.
12.
Kumar G, Dash P, Patnaik, J, Pany G. Socioeconomic Status Scale- Modified Kuppuswamy Scale For The Year 2022. Int J Comm Dent. 2022;10(1-6):10.56501. [crossref]
13.
Peake WT, Rosowski JJ, Lynch TJ. 3 rd. Middle-ear transmission: Acoustic versus ossicular coupling in Cat and human. Hear Res. 1992;57(2):245-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Shinta N, Purnami N, Ahadiah TH. Study report: association between pure tone average and ossicular status in chronic suppurative otitis media. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018;1075 (1):012062. [crossref]
15.
Sharma M, Shetty DP. Ossicular status in patients operated for chronic suppurative otitis media. Int J Res Rev. 2016;4(9):1610-16. [crossref]
16.
Mahesh HC, Kamath MP, Shreedharan SS, Kumar N, Kumar A, Chandra S, et al. A study of mastoid cellularity and middle ear diseases. Indian J Otol. 2004;10;06-09.
17.
Henry KG, Wlodyka J. Mastoid pneumatisation in chronic otitis media. Arch Oto- laryng. 1966:83;343-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Sunita M, Sambandan AP. Importance of preoperative HRCT temporal bone in chronic suppurative media. Odisha J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;9;10-13.
19.
Rawat V, Saxena AK, Kumar S, Gupta PK. Radiological Study of Temporal Bone in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media and Correlation with Clinical and Surgical Findings. UP J OtolaryngoL Head Neck Surg. 2016:4;01-04.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58221.17399

Date of Submission: Jun 04, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 02, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 01, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 18, 2022
• Manual Googling: Sep 30, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 28, 2022 (25%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com