Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 18374

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : ED04 - ED06 Full Version

Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma with Leiomyomatous Stroma


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60576.17565
Renu Mariam Thomas, Parvathy D Ullas, VP Gangadharan

1. Senior Consultant, Department of Pathology, VPS Lakeshore Hospital and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala, India. 2. Resident, Department of Pathology, VPS Lakeshore Hospital and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala, India. 3. Senior Consultant, Department of Oncology, VPS Lakeshore Hospital and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Renu Mariam Thomas,
Senior Consultant, Department of Histopathology, VPS Lakeshore Hospital and Research Centre, Kochi-682040, Kerala, India.
E-mail: resurenu@yahoo.co.uk

Abstract

This case report is about an unusual subtype of renal cell carcinoma with distinct morphological pattern in a 24-year-old female patient with tuberous sclerosis complex. She presented with pain in the left flank and an Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) upper abdomen showed a solid cystic lesion in the interpolar region of left kidney, measuring 2.8×2.8×2.8 cm. She underwent partial nephrectomy which revealed a solid cystic tumour. Microscopically, the tumour was composed of long branching tubules lined by cells with voluminous clear/vacuolated cytoplasm. A prominent fibromyomatous stroma was seen focally, separating the tumour into nodular aggregates. Tumour cells were positive for Cytokeratin 7 (CK7) on immunohistochemical study. These features were consistent with renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma. Genetic study showed a heterozygous non sense variation in Tuberous Sclerosis 1 (TSC1), gene, diagnostic of tuberous sclerosis. This report exemplifies the pivotal role pathologists play in the initial identification of certain hereditary cancer syndrome. The distinct morphology and immunohistochemical profile of the tumour is described.

Keywords

Abdomen, Cytokeratin 7, Kidney, Nephrectomy

Case Report

A 24-year-old female patient presented with left flank pain and microscopic haematuria for the past five months. She gave a history of seizures from the age of 10 years and multiple recurring skin lesions on the face. Patient denied a history of similar illness in other family members.

Computed Tomography (CT) scan of upper abdomen showed a solid cystic lesion in the interpolar region of left kidney, measuring 2.8×2.8×2.8 cm (Table/Fig 1). MRI scan of the brain showed tiny enhancing subependymal nodules and radial bands in the juxtacortical white matter region (Table/Fig 2), which were consistent with precursor lesions of subependymal giant cell astrocytoma. She underwent partial nephrectomy which revealed a solid cystic tumour, measuring 3×3×3 cm. The patient had visited after nephrectomy for a second opinion from the oncologist who then requested the Pathology Department to review the histopathology slides.

Microscopically, the tumour was composed of long branching tubules lined by cells with voluminous clear/vacuolated cytoplasm (Table/Fig 3). Several intracytoplasmic globules were observed. Focal papillary pattern with slender fibrovascular cores (Table/Fig 4) and in places, tightly packed tubules lined by low grade clear cells resembling clear cell papillary renal cell tumour but without the characteristic abluminal arrangement of nuclei were noted. A prominent fibromyomatous stroma was seen focally, separating the tumour into nodular aggregates (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6). Immunohistochemical study showed diffuse Cytokeratin 7 (CK7) (Table/Fig 7) and Carbonic Anhydrase IX (CAIX) staining, the latter with a complete circumferential membranous pattern (Table/Fig 8). Cluster Differentiation 10 (CD10) was focally positive. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) and Cytokeratin 20 (CK20) were negative. Based on these findings, a provisional diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma with tubulopapillary pattern and fibromyomatous stroma was offered with an advice for further detailed work up. The tumour was confined within the kidney, TNM stage pT1a.

Considering the young age of the patient, unusual morphology of the tumour and brain lesions on MRI study, genetic study was done which confirmed a heterozygous non sense variation in TSC1 gene involving exon 5 with autosomal dominant inheritance pattern that results in a stop codon and premature truncation of the protein at codon 79. A final diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis complex associated renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma was rendered.

Discussion

The 2016 World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of renal epithelial neoplasia includes several emerging/provisional entities, one of which is Renal Cell Carcinoma with Leiomyomatous Stroma (RCCLMS), described as a distinct subtype occurring either sporadically or associated with Tuberous Sclerosis (TSC) (1). It is characterised by branching tubules and papillae lined by cells with voluminous clear cytoplasm and focal to prominent smooth muscle and fibrous stromal component (2). It closely resembles Renal Angiomyoadenomatous Tumour (RAT), another tumour having prominent leiomyomatous stroma which is now considered as a morphological variation of clear cell papillary renal cell tumour due to considerable overlap between the two (2).

The association of RCCLMS with TSC originated from the observations in two large studies by Guo J et al., and Yang P et al., [3,4]. Guo J et al., reported a series of Renal Cell Carcinomas (RCCs) occurring in TSC patients, of which 30% had features similar to tumours previously described as “RAT” and therefore termed “RAT” like. In a separate series of TSC-associated RCC, Yang P et al., used the term “TSC-associated RCC with prominent papillary structure” to describe morphologically identical tumours composed of large clear cells with fine eosinophilic thread-like strands in the cytoplasm and diffuse immunoreactivity for CK7, CD10 and CAIX (4). Subsequently, Hakimi AA et al., described tumours with similar morphology occurring in patients without TSC and associated with hotspot mutations in TCEB1 (ELOC) (5). All tumours lacked the 3p loss characteristic of clear cell RCC. Recently, Shah RB et al., reported the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of 18 sporadic RCCs with similar morphology, harbouring recurrent mutations of TSC1/TSC2, MTOR, and/or ELOC and without Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene mutations or other copy number alterations associated with other subtypes of RCC (2). Based on these findings, they hypothesised that RCCLMS is a novel subtype of RCC that occurs in sporadic setting which is identical to both the subsets of RCCs described in patients with TSC (described as “RAT-like” and “TSC-associated papillary”), and the recently described sporadic RCCs with ELOC mutation but distinct from clear cell RCC and clear cell papillary renal cell tumour. Parilla M et al., also recently reported three similar sporadic cases associated with genetic alterations in either TSC1 or TSC2 (6).

The index case showed identical morphology as described in these reported cases, composed of nodular aggregates of long branching tubules lined by cells with voluminous clear/vacuolated cytoplasm and focal prominent fibromyomatous stroma. Tumour cells were diffusely positive for CK7 and CAIX. Patient had other features of tuberous sclerosis complex and showed genetic alterations in TSC1 gene.

The RCCLMS should be differentiated from other RCCs showing leiomyomatous stroma, mainly clear cell RCC, papillary RCC, clear cell papillary renal cell tumour and translocation RCC. The characteristic morphology allows distinction from other RCC subtypes in most cases. It is also characterised by complete membranous CAIX staining pattern and diffuse CK7 expression, the latter being unusual in clear cell RCC.

Most reported RCCLMS were associated with an indolent behaviour except one case with a single lymph node metastasis (2). Therefore, additional studies are needed to fully characterise the biological behaviour of this group of tumours. No recurrence/metastases has developed in the index case over the short follow-up period of one year.

Renal cell carcinoma associated with alterations in TSC genes encompasses a broad histological spectrum and has been described under different terminologies. One such tumour Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic (ESC) RCC has now been accepted as a separate entity in the 2022 WHO classification of renal epithelial neoplasia (7). It is characterised by solid and cystic architecture, polygonal neoplastic cells with voluminous eosinophilic cytoplasm, basophilic cytoplasmic stippling, and frequent patchy immunoreactivity for cytokeratin 20 (8),(9),(10),(11). Other tumours associated with TSC gene alterations such as Eosinophilic Vacuolated Tumour (EVT) and low grade oncocytic tumour (LOT) are considered as emerging entities under the category of “other oncocytic/chromophobe RCC” (12),(13),(14). ELOC mutated RCC which has a similar morphology to RCCLMS is also included in the 2022 WHO classification as a prototype of a molecularly based RCC subtype (7).

Conclusion

Here, a distinct subtype of RCC with specific morphology that occurs in the setting of TSC is described. Despite distinct molecular features, a careful morphologic analysis, along with the diffuse CK7 positivity, is sufficient for an accurate diagnosis in vast majority of the cases. Pathologists should be aware of the expanding spectrum of RCC subtypes and their association with several hereditary renal neoplasia since it helps to guide the clinicians for performing specific molecular testing that has potential role in the development of targeted therapies.

Acknowledgement

Authors thank Dr. Rajal B. Shah, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Centre, Dallas, for reviewing the case and Anbukayalvizhi Chandrasekaren, Med Genome Labs Ltd., Bangalore for carrying out the genetic study.

References

1.
Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE (Eds). WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. 4th ed. IARC: Lyon 2016. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Shah RB, Stohr BA, Tu ZJ, Gao Y, Przybycin CG, Nguyen J, et al. ‘Renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma’ harbor somatic mutations of TSC1, TSC2, MTOR, and/or ELOC (TCEB1): Clinicopathologic and molecular characterization of 18 sporadic tumors supports a distinct entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44(5):571-81.[crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Guo J, Tretiakova MS, Troxell ML, Osunkoya AO, Fadare O, Sangoi AR, et al. Tuberous sclerosis-associated renal cell carcinoma: A clinicopathologic study of 57 separate carcinomas in 18 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38;1457-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Yang P, Cornejo KM, Sadow PM, Cheng L, Wang M, Xiao Y, et al. Renal cell carcinoma in tuberous sclerosis complex. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38; 895-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Hakimi AA, Tickoo SK, Jacobsen A, Sarungbam J, Sfakianos JP, Sato Y, et al. TCEB1-mutated renal cell carcinoma: A distinct genomic and morphological subtype. Mod Pathol: Off J U S Can Acad Pathol Inc. 2015;28;845-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Parilla M, Alikhan M, Al-Kawaaz M, Patil S, Kadri S, Ritterhouse LL, et al. Genetic underpinnings of renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43:1135-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Moch H, Amin MB, Berney DM, Compérat EM, Gill AJ, Hartmann A, et al. The 2022 World Health Organization classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part A: Renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol. 2022:S0302-2838(22):02467-68.
8.
Mehra R, Vats P, Cao X, Su F, Lee ND, Lonigro R, et al. Somatic bi-allelic loss of TSC genes in eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2018;74:483-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Parilla M, Kadri S, Patil SA, Ritterhouse L, Segal J, Henriksen KJ, et al. Are sporadic eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinomas characterized by somatic tuberous sclerosis gene mutations? Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:911-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Trpkov K, Abou-Ouf H, Hes O, Lopez JI, Nesi G, Comperat E, et al. Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC): Further morphologic and molecular characterization of ESC RCC as a distinct entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:1299-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Trpkov K, Hes O, Bonert M, Lopez JI, Bonsib SM, Nesi G, et al. Eosinophilic, solid, and cystic renal cell carcinoma: Clinicopathologic study of 16 unique, sporadic neoplasms occurring in women. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:60-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Farcas¸ M, Gatalica Z, Trpkov K, Swensen J, Zhou M, Alaghehbandan R, et al. Eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) of kidney demonstrates sporadic TSC/ MTOR mutations: Next-generation sequencing multi-institutional study of 19 cases. Mod Pathol. 2022;35(3):344-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Trpkov K, Hes O, Williamson SR, Adeniran AJ, Agaimy A, Alaghehbandan R, et al. New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia. Mod Pathol. 2021;34:1392-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Siadat F, Trpkov K. ESC, ALK, HOT and LOT: Three letter acronyms of emerging renal entities knocking on the door of the WHO classification. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(1):168.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

Abdomen, Cytokeratin 7, Kidney, Nephrectomy

Date of Submission: Oct 04, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 11, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Dec 13, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 05, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 08, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Dec 10, 2022 (19%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com