Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 239688

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : ZD07 - ZD09 Full Version

Surgical Approach to Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis Caused by Tooth Root Displacement into the Maxillary Sinus: A Case Report


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60397.17593
Marcelo Dias Moreira de Assis Costa, Étore Goulart Chagas, LLudmila Cássia Lopes Pinheiro, Lia Dietrich, Luiz Renato Paranhos

1. PhD Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Dental Implants, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 2. Undergraduate Student, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 3. Undergraduate Student, School of Dentistry, Faculdade Patos de Minas, Patos de Minas, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 4. PhD, Adjunt Professor, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 5. PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Correspondence Address :
Luiz Renato Paranhos,
School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Piratini Rebublic Avenue, s/n°, 4L Block, Umuarama-38400902, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
E-mail: paranhos.lrp@gmail.com

Abstract

Paranasal sinuses affected by foreign bodies are uncommon clinical situations. Foreign body displacement into facial sinuses is a potential iatrogenic complication, that may cause an oroantral fistula, sinusitis, cellulitis, and subdural emphysema. The maxillary sinus is usually the most affected by tooth displacements, due to its proximity. A dental fragment in the maxillary sinus may cause Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis (OMS). The present case report presents a case from the diagnosis to treatment of OMS originated by a fragment of tooth root displacement into the sinus during a previous dental extraction. A female patient, 13-year-old, had characteristic signs of sinusitis, reporting rhinorrhoea, headache, eye pain, and pain on the left side of the face. The clinical examination showed pain on palpation in the buccal region of the upper left first molar, which was absent. The Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) showed a foreign body inside the maxillary sinus, complete opacification, and bone defect on the sinus floor. Given the final diagnosis of OMS, the treatment selected was the combination of antibiotic therapy and fragment removal from the sinus. The diagnosis, planning, and correct use of surgical techniques described in the literature are essential for preventing iatrogenesis and actively ensuring patient health. In this sense, patients need to be informed about any complication, which should be written in the medical records along with resolution measures.

Keywords

Caldwell-Luc technique, Full-thickness flap, Iatrogenic disease, Postoperative complications

Case Report

A female patient, 13-year-old, black, attended the University Hospital, along with her mother for an evaluation of pain on the left side of her face. Nothing stood out in her previous medical history. During the anamnesis and clinical examination, the main complaint was acute pain which worsened when bending over, on the left side of the face, rhinorrhoea, headache, and eye pain, which had been recurrent for three months and increased in the previous week. Such signs and symptoms had never occurred before. The imaging and clinical tests verified extraoral aspects for shape, colour, or size abnormalities, but there were no occurrences. The intraoral analysis showed healthy mucosa with regular colour, the absence of tooth 26, and painful symptoms on palpation in the buccal region of the edentulous area. There was no buccosinusal fistula.

Regarding the onset of symptoms, the patient said, she had been through a dental extraction four months earlier, which presented an intercurrence that she could not explain. The patient provided a low-quality periapical radiograph of the upper left molar region, suggesting the presence of a foreign body inside the maxillary sinus. A CBCT was requested, and the image indicated a root fragment inside the maxillary sinus, complete opacification of the left sinus, and bone defect on the sinus floor, therefore suggesting that the pain and symptoms of the patient referred to OMS (Table/Fig 1).

Before the surgery, amoxicillin was administrated along with potassium clavulanate for three days. The upper anterior, middle, and posterior alveolar nerves were blocked using an anaesthetic with a vasoconstrictor. A #15 scalpel blade was used to make a Caldwell-Luc incision on the left side, from the upper canine region to the second molar, followed by a full-thickness flap. Perforations were made in the anterior sinus wall on the zygomaticomaxillary buttress, 5 mm above the roots apexes of the teeth, to delimitate a bone window. After removing the bone window, the sinus mucosa was ruptured, showing a purulent secretion. After aspirating the sinus secretion, the root was identified and extracted with a curved haemostat. Next, the sinus cavity was abundantly washed with 0.9% saline solution, and haemostasis and suture were performed. The surgery occurred without intercurrences (Table/Fig 2).

The postoperative antibiotic therapy continued for 10 days to manage pain and inflammation, added with 50 mg sodium diclofenac three times a day for three days and 500 mg dipyrone four times a day for four days. The patient received postoperative instructions, focusing on not blowing her nose, sneezing with an open mouth and nose, and not using mouth rinses. The patient was observed weekly for one month and showed complete symptom remission and no complications. On the 40th postoperative day, a panoramic radiograph indicated the absence of the maxillary sinus shadow and the root fragment. The patient continued under a monthly follow-up for one year without complications associated with the procedure (Table/Fig 3).

The patient reported a significant improvement in rhinorrhoea, headache, and eye pain immediately after the surgery. There was no more residual pain on the left side of her face after one week. The patient reported that the postoperative period was much easier than after extracting tooth 26.

Discussion

It is a descriptive case report following the Social Chaos And Response Emergency (SCARE) checklist guidelines (1). Accidents and complications during dental extractions are usual in the daily 8routine of dentists (2). Displaced foreign bodies can appear inside the sinus, including teeth or tooth roots (3). The maxillary sinus base covers the apexes of upper posterior teeth, usually separated from the sinus floor, by either a dense cortical bone with a variable thickness or only by the mucoperiosteum (4). The literature has reported acute OMS, and the published data show a higher number of cases over the last decades (5). A recent retrospective analysis found that, approximately 15% of maxillary sinusitis has a dental origin (6).

Maxillary sinusitis is a common condition, usually easily diagnosed. Due to the close anatomic relationship between the maxillary sinus and upper molars, maxillary sinusitis may appear as a toothache. Differing odontogenic orofacial pain from the pain associated with maxillary sinusitis and identifying the origin of sinusitis is relevant for correct treatment intervention. The OMS treatment consists primarily of removing the causal factor (3). In the present case, the previous history of complications during a posterior maxillary tooth extraction contributed to diagnosing the origin of the sinusitis. The conventional treatment for sinusitis only, with medication would lead to failure because the root permanence would cause recurrences (5).

The CBCT is a reliable resource for planning surgeries inside maxillary sinuses because it produces high resolution (7) three-dimensional images, facilitating the localisation of foreign bodies. It also presents a lower effective radiation dose, lower cost, more access, and lower acquisition time than multislice tomography (8). The image provided by CBCT facilitates the diagnosis and allows to locate the foreign body, guiding the surgical procedure.

The Caldwell-Luc technique is extensively used to access the maxillary sinus. Despite the recent tendency to endoscopic approaches, the traditional procedure is preferable, when dealing with a large foreign body (9). The Caldwell-Luc approach is simple, extensively used, dismisses hospitalisation, does not require specific equipment, and a general practitioner can perform it in a standard dental office, hence, its selection.

The European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps Group ratified complete sinus opacification in computed tomography as an indication for antibiotics for sinusitis (5). The recommended antibiotic therapy is penicillin of the amoxicillin type associated with potassium clavulanate (10) because Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent bacterium in most cases (11). Amoxicillin associated with potassium clavulanate or clavulanic acid is an accessible and efficient first choice alternative for b-lactamase-producing bacteria in the upper airway. Its use associated with causal factor removal effectively resolved the infection (10).

Conclusion

A detailed analysis during the anamnesis and clinical examination provided vital information to the diagnosis and origin of the infection, which is essential for successful sinusitis treatment. The Caldwell-Luc approach in the maxillary sinus is a viable option for dentists because it is a simple and easy technique, that does not require specific equipment or training.

Ethical approval: The study was submitted to ethical appraisal by the Local Committee (CPEA: 17973319.6.0000.8078), and the person responsible for the patient signed a Consent Form (CF).

References

1.
Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Farwana R, Koshy K, Fowler AJ, Orgill DP, et al. The SCARE 2018 statement: Updating consensus Surgical Case Report (SCARE) guidelines. Int J Surg. 2018;60:132-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Gazal G. Management of an emergency tooth extraction in diabetic patients on the dental chair. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32(1):01-06. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Wolf MK, Rostetter C, Stadlinger B, Locher M, Damerau G. Preoperative 3D imaging in maxillary sinus: Brief review of the literature and case report. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(7):627-31.
4.
Arias-Irimia O, Barona-Dorado C, Santos-Marino JA, Martínez-Rodriguez N, Martínez-González JM. Meta-analysis of the etiology of odontogenic maxillary sinusitis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(1):e70-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, Hellings PW, Kern R, Reitsma S, et al. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020;58(Suppl S29):01-464. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Wuokko-Landén A, Blomgren K, Välimaa H. Acute rhinosinusitis- are we forgetting the possibility of a dental origin? A retrospective study of 385 patients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2019;139(9):783-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Kocak N, Alpoz E, Boyacioglu H. Morphological assessment of maxillary sinus septa variations with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish population. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(1):42-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Yamauchi T, Tani A, Yokoyama S, Ogawa H. Assessment of non-invasive chronic fungal rhinosinusitis by cone beam CT: Comparison with multidetector CT findings. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2017;63(2):100-05. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
S¸ ahin MM, Yilmaz M, Karamert R, Cebeci S, Uzunog? lu E, Düzlü M, et al. Evaluation of Caldwell-Luc operation in the endoscopic era: Experience from past 7 years. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(9):1478-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Saibene AM, Vassena C, Pipolo C, Trimboli M, De Vecchi E, Felisati G, et al. Odontogenic and rhinogenic chronic sinusitis: A modern microbiological comparison. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6(1):41-45. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Aruni AW, Dou Y, Mishra A, Fletcher HM. The biofilm community-rebels with a cause. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2015;2(1):48-56.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60397.17593

Date of Submission: Sep 23, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 21, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 19, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 25, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 31, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 15, 2022 (2%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com