Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 126333

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : LC01 - LC05 Full Version

Risk Assessment of Type II Diabetes using Indian Diabetic Risk Score in Andhra Pradesh, India: A Cross-sectional Study

Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI:
P Sudha Kumari, M Siva Durga Prasad Naik, Anusha Parisapogu, Leena Josephin Jetty, Vishnupriya

1. Professor and Head, Department of Community Medicine, Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Research Scholar, Department of Community Medicine, Guntur Medical College, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Research Scholar, Department of Community Medicine, Guntur Medical College, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. 5. Postgraduate Student, Department of Community Medicine, Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. P Sudha Kumari,
Flat 508, KPS Grand, Kurnool, Andhra-518002 Pradesh, India.


Introduction: Diabetes has emerged as a global pandemic of the 21st century, with approximately 463 million adults (aged 20-79 years) living with diabetes worldwide in 2019. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is the most common form of diabetes compared to Type 1 and other forms. The burden of diabetes in India is expected to increase in the coming years. The Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) is a validated and cost-effective tool used to identify the risk of developing diabetes among the population.

Aim: To estimate the risk of T2DM using the IDRS in adults aged 25 years and above. Additionally, the study aimed to explore the association between the risk of diabetes and other factors.

Materials and Methods: An observational, community-based, cross-sectional study was conducted in the field practice area of Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data collection took place from December 2022 to February 2023, using a simple random sampling technique. The study included residents aged over 25. A sample size of 100 participants was selected. The IDRS, developed by the Madras Diabetic Research Foundation (MDRF), was used as a validated tool to screen individuals at high-risk of developing T2DM. Data was collected using a semistructured questionnaire that included socio-demographic information, the IDRS tool to detect the risk of developing diabetes, and other risk factors such as Body Mass Index (BMI), family history of diabetes, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and hypertension. Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. The Chi-square test was used to determine significance, with a p-value of <0.05 considered significant.

Results: A total of 100 residents aged over 25 years were included in the study. IDRS categorisation revealed that 14 (14%) were at low risk, 43 (43%) at moderate risk, and 43 (43%) at high-risk for developing T2DM, respectively. A statistically significant association was observed between diabetes risk score and individuals who smoked (p=0.04), consumed alcohol (p=0.04), and had hypertension (p<0.001). BMI showed a positive correlation with IDRS score (p=0.031), family history score (p=0.028), and waist circumference score (p=0.034).

Conclusion: Early detection of the risk of diabetes through periodic screening and effective behavioural change communication could be instrumental in controlling the diabetes crisis.


Body mass index, Diabetes, High-risk, Screening

The global prevalence of diabetes in 2019 is estimated to be 9.3% (463 million people), projected to increase to 10.2% (578 million) by 2030 and 10.9% (700 million) by 2045. The prevalence is higher in urban areas (10.8%) compared to rural areas (7.2%), and in high-income countries (10.4%) compared to low-income countries (4.0%). Half of the people living with diabetes (50.1%) are unaware of their condition (1). The IDRS tool was developed by Mohan V et al., at the MDRF for screening individuals to identify those at high-risk of developing type 2 diabetes in the future (2). It is a validated, inexpensive tool that requires minimal time and effort. The IDRS considers four risk factors: age, family history, abdominal obesity, and physical activity.

Type 2 diabetes is more common than Type 1 diabetes (2). Factors such as abdominal obesity, increased waist circumference, and lower BMI are characteristic of the Asian Indian phenotype, making Indians more susceptible to diabetes and its complications (2). Early treatment of diabetes improves both microvascular and macrovascular outcomes in the long run. It has been observed that more than half of people with diabetes remain undiagnosed (3). The burden of diabetes in India is expected to worsen in the coming years. The current priority is to screen the high-risk population, diagnose them, and provide treatment in the community. Diabetic screening has been recognised as a means to improve quality of life (4). Mass awareness and screening programs are needed to identify and address the disease burden.

The present study aimed to identify individuals at risk of developing diabetes using the IDRS. It focused on adults aged over 25 years and aimed to estimate the risk of type 2 diabetes using the IDRS, as well as examine its association with other factors.

Material and Methods

The present observational community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in the field practice area of Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India, to assess the risk of diabetes in an adult population aged over 25 years. Data collection was carried out from December 2022 to February 2023 for a period of three months, using a simple random sampling technique. Institutional Ethical Committee clearance was obtained with reference number 186/2022, and written informed consent was obtained from the study participants.

Inclusion criteria: Residents aged over 25 years who gave consent and were permanent residents of the area (residing for more than one year) were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Individuals previously diagnosed with diabetes and pregnant women were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated with a prevalence (p) of 9.3% ± 5, at a 90% confidence interval. The estimated sample size was 92. Accounting for a 5% non response rate, the final sample size was rounded up to 100.

Study Procedure

The study participants were selected using a simple random technique in the rural field practice area of Kurnool Medical College, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India, until a sample size of 100 was achieved. The Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS), developed by MDRF, was used as a validated tool to screen individuals at high-risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). It takes into account four risk factors: age, waist circumference, physical activity, and family history of diabetes. Based on the scores obtained, the study participants were classified into low-risk (<30), moderate-risk (30-50), and high-risk (>=60) categories (Table/Fig 1).

After explaining the study details to the participants in the local language, Telugu, the interns conducted face-to-face interviews to fill out a semistructured questionnaire. The questionnaire included socio-demographic factors, IDRS risk score, BMI, per capita income, waist circumference, physical activity, TV viewing hours, family history of diabetes, fibre consumption, consumption of junk food, smoking, and alcohol consumption. BMI was calculated by dividing a person’s weight in kilograms by the square of their height in meters (BMI=kg/m2). Trained interns measured waist circumference using a standard method and recorded the measurements.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 23.0, and the results were presented in proportions and cross tabulations. Pearson’s correlation was calculated to assess the relationship between BMI and per capita income with the diabetes risk score. The chi-square test was applied to examine the association between different variables and the diabetes risk level. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


The mean age of the participants was 46.42 years, with a standard deviation of 11.865. The study had nearly equal representation of males (57%) and females (43%). The majority of participants (63%) belonged to the 35 to 49 years age group. Unskilled workers accounted for the highest percentage (53%), followed by skilled and professional workers. Participants with an income range of 5000-10000 rupees were more prevalent compared to other income groups. The IDRS scores of participants were predominantly in the moderate (43%) and high (43%) categories, with fewer participants in the low-risk category (14%). Among the participants, 54% engaged in moderate physical activity. Around 50% of participants reported watching television for more than 3-6 hours, while 42% reported watching for 3 hours (Table/Fig 2).

The BMI showed a positive correlation with the IDRS score, indicating that as BMI increases, the risk of diabetes also increases (Table/Fig 3). However, per capita income did not show a significant correlation with the diabetes risk score. On the other hand, BMI showed a positive correlation with waist circumference score, family history score, and IDRS scores. This suggests that regardless of economic status, a high BMI is associated with an increased risk of diabetes (Table/Fig 4). Statistically significant associations were observed between the diabetes risk score and smoking (p=0.04), alcohol consumption (p=0.04), and hypertension (p<0.001). Smoking, alcohol consumption, and hypertension were significantly associated with a very high-risk of diabetes (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 5). Variables such as gender, occupation, residence, television viewing hours, junk food consumption, and fibre food consumption did not show a significant association with a very high-risk of diabetes (Table/Fig 5).

In summary, the study findings indicate that BMI is positively correlated with the IDRS score, suggesting an increased risk of diabetes with higher BMI values. Per capita income did not show a significant association with the diabetes risk score. Smoking, alcohol consumption, and hypertension were significantly associated with a very high-risk of diabetes. However, variables such as gender, occupation, residence, television viewing hours, junk food consumption, and fibre food consumption did not show a significant association with a very high level of diabetes.


The IDRS categorisation revealed that 14% of participants were classified as low-risk, 43% as moderate-risk, and 43% as high-risk. A statistically significant association was observed between the diabetes risk score and smoking (p=0.04), alcohol consumption (p=0.04), and hypertension (p<0.001). BMI showed a positive correlation with the IDRS score (p=0.031), family history score (p=0.028), and waist circumference score (p=0.034). These findings indicated that, regardless of economic status, a high BMI is a contributing factor to a high-risk of developing diabetes in the present study.

Similar results were reported in a study conducted by Patil RS and Gothankar JS, where the prevalence of individuals at high-risk of diabetes was 36.55%. The study also found that low physical activity and high waist circumference were major contributing factors among the high-risk and moderate-risk groups, which aligns with the findings of the present study (5).

In a study by Sharma S et al., it was found that 15.5% had low risk, 56% had moderate risk, and 28.5% had high-risk of developing diabetes, which is similar to the findings of the present study. The study also indicated a higher risk of developing diabetes among females and individuals with a high BMI, which is consistent with the present study. Furthermore, the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure showed an increasing trend with an increase in the IDRS score, which was also observed in the present study where high BMI and hypertension were associated with higher scores (6).

A study conducted by Nagarathna R et al., reported that 40.9% of subjects in urban and rural regions were identified as high-risk or known/newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus patients, which aligns with the findings of the present study (43%) (7).

Muthuvelraj SB and Maiya GR stated that, according to the IDRS, 35.2% (112 participants) were classified as high-risk, 55% (175 participants) as moderate-risk, and 9.7% (31 participants) as low-risk for developing diabetes, which is comparable to the present study. The study also found that subjects with a family history of diabetes, increased waist circumference, and older age were associated with a higher risk of developing diabetes, which was also observed in the present study where family history and BMI > 23 kg/m2 showed positive correlations (8).

In a study by Holla R et al., one-third of the participants had an IDRS score ≥60, categorising them as high-risk for type 2 diabetes, which is similar to the present study where the combined high-risk and moderate-risk groups accounted for 86% (43% plus 43%) (9).

In the study conducted by Nittoori S and Wilson V, out of 136 study participants, 101 (74.3%) were at high-risk (IDRS ≥60), followed by 32 (23.5%) at moderate risk (IDRS 30-50), and three (2.2%) at low risk (IDRS <30). Among individuals aged ≥50 years, a total of 62 (92.5%) were at high-risk, compared to 34 (63%) in the 35-49 years age group. The majority of sedentary workers (n=35, 87.5%) were at high-risk, while those employed in moderate (n=52, 75.4%) and strenuous work (n=14, 51.9%) had lower percentages. Factors such as abdominal obesity, general obesity, and high blood pressure were significantly associated with a high-risk IDRS score. Similarly, in the present study, 43% were at high-risk and 43% at moderate risk. Additionally, lower levels of physical activity, higher BMI, waist circumference, and high blood pressure were significantly associated with a high-risk IDRS score (10). In Gupta MK et al., study, out of a total of 942 participants, 447 (47.3%) had an IDRS score ≥60, which was consistent with the present study’s findings of 43% (11). Acharya AS et al., reported that out of 580 subjects, 31 (5.3%) were not at risk of having diabetes, while the remaining 94.5% were at moderate or high-risk, which aligns with the present study’s finding of 86% at moderate and high-risk of diabetes. A statistically significant association was observed between diabetes risk and BMI (p=0.049) and systolic blood pressure (p=0.006), which was consistent with the present study (12).

The IDRS categorisation revealed 14 (14%) in the low-risk category, 43 (43%) in the moderate-risk category, and 43 (43%) in the high-risk category. There was a statistically significant association between diabetes risk score and smoking (p=0.04), alcohol consumption (p=0.04), and hypertension (p<0.001). BMI showed a positive correlation with IDRS score (p=0.031), family history score (p=0.028), and waist circumference score (p=0.034). The study population had a combined high-risk and moderate-risk percentage of 86% (43% plus 43%) for developing diabetes, which is an alarming sign. The present study also indicates that regardless of economic status, a high BMI increases the risk of developing diabetes.


The sample size taken was small, and there is a need to conduct further studies with a larger sample.


The present study assessed diabetes risk using IDRS, a simple and cost-effective non invasive screening tool. There is still a lack of awareness about healthy diet and exercise, but paramedical workers can be trained to screen the population. The authors’ findings can help the government implement IDRS-based risk assessment, enabling early diagnosis and behaviour change to halt the transition from prediabetes to diabetes, reducing morbidity and mortality due to diabetes mellitus.

Hence, the relevance of the present study was that the assessment tools like IDRS can rapidly screen communities and be employed on a larger scale to identify the prevalence of diabetes risk factors in the population.


Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al., Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843. [crossref][PubMed]
Mohan V, Deepa R, Deepa M, Somannavar S, Datta M. A simplified Indian Diabetes Risk Score for screening for undiagnosed diabetic subjects. J Assoc Physicians India. 2005;53:759-63.
Joshi SR, Das AK, Vijay VJ, Mohan V. Challenges in diabetes care in India: Sheer numbers, lack of awareness and inadequate control. J Assoc Physicians India. 2008;56:443-50.
Kahn R, Alperin P, Eddy D, Borch-Johnsen K, Buse J, Feigelman J, et al., Age at initiation and frequency of screening to detect type 2 diabetes: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet Lond Engl. 2010;375(9723):1365-74. [crossref][PubMed]
Patil RS, Gothankar JS. Assessment of risk of type 2 diabetes using the Indian Diabetes Risk Score in an urban slum of Pune, Maharashtra, India: A cross-sectional study. WHO South-East Asia J Public Health. 2016;5(1):53-61. [crossref][PubMed]
Sharma S, Bansal A, Singh SP, Chaudhary A, Satija M, Singla A, et al., Assessment of diabetes risk profile in a rural population of northern India using the Indian Diabetes Risk Score-A community-based study. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2022;11(11):7077-84. [crossref][PubMed]
Nagarathna R, Tyagi R, Battu P, Singh A, Anand A, Nagendra HR. Assessment of risk of diabetes by using Indian Diabetic risk score (IDRS) in Indian population. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;162:108088. [crossref][PubMed]
Muthuvelraj SB, Maiya GR. Screening for the risk of diabetes among people aged 31 to 40 years using Indian’ diabetic risk score among people attending medicine out-patient department of a tertiary care hospital in Chennai. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2021;10(1):213-17. [crossref][PubMed]
Holla R, Bhagawan D, Unnikrishnan B, Masanamuthu DN, Bhattacharya S, Kejriwal A, et al., Risk assessment for diabetes mellitus by using Indian diabetes risk score among office workers of health institutions of south India. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2022;18(7):e251121198316. [crossref][PubMed]
Nittoori S, Wilson V. Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus among urban slum population using Indian Diabetes Risk Score. Indian J Med Res. 2020;152(3):308-11.[crossref][PubMed]
Gupta MK, Raghav P, Tanvir T, Gautam V, Mehto A, Choudhary Y, et al., Recalibrating the Non-Communicable Diseases risk prediction tools for the rural population of Western India. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):376. [crossref][PubMed]
Acharya AS, Singh A, Dhiman B. Assessment of diabetes risk in an adult population using Indian diabetes risk score in an urban resettlement colony of Delhi. J Assoc Physicians India. 2017;65(3):46-51.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65155.18626

Date of Submission: May 02, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 05, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 07, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

• Plagiarism X-checker: May 06, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 05, 2023 (15%)

Etymology: Author Origin

Emendations: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)