Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 122218

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : OC01 - OC04 Full Version

Significance of Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratio, Neutrophil-platelet Ratio, and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and Platelet Ratio in Predicting Outcomes in Dengue Patients on Admission in Wardha, Maharashtra, India: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI:
Sachin Agrawal, Sunil Kumar, Dhruv Talwar, Mansi Patel, Harshitha Reddy

1. Professor, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sunil Kumar,
Professor, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.


Introduction: Dengue is an important viral infectious disease, mostly seen in tropical countries during the rainy season, and is emerging as a public health hazard for healthcare facilities. The most common parameters used to assess the severity of dengue are platelet count and haematocrit. However, new haematological parameters have emerged to predict the severity of dengue fever and assist clinicians, especially in resource-limited settings.

Aim: To highlight the significance of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Neutrophil-Platelet Ratio (NPR), and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet Ratio (NLPR) in predicting outcomes in patients with dengue infection.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in rural central India in the Department of Medicine at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. A total of 540 patients infected with the dengue virus between June 2021 and December 2021. Data analysis was conducted from January to April 2022. Neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts were used to calculate NLR, NPR, and NLPR, and their roles in predicting the final outcome were studied. The final analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 21.0. The p-value<0.05 than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 29.85±13.40 years, ranging from 18 to 85 years, with a median age of 25 years. A total of 331 (61.7%) patients below 30 years of age were significantly higher than patients aged 30 years or older (38.3%) (Z=3.39; p=0.0007). The Area Under Curve (AUC) for NLR (0.852) was higher than that for NLPR (0.828) and NPR (0.708). Therefore, NLR was more effective in predicting adverse outcomes compared to NLPR and NPR. However, the efficacies of NLR and NLPR seemed to be more or less equal.

Conclusion: The NLR was a better predictor of outcome or severity in dengue fever when compared to NPR and NLPR. Hence, it can be a cost-effective tool used by physicians working in rural hospitals with limited resources.


Complete blood count, Coronavirus disease-2019, Dengue fever, Differential count, Haemogram, Severity

Dengue has emerged as one of the most important vector-borne diseases globally, with increasing incidence throughout the world. It is estimated that more than two-fifths of the world’s population resides in areas endemic for dengue, and approximately 2% are infected annually (1). Previously, dengue was thought to be a disease primarily affecting urban areas. However, with unplanned urbanisation, exponential population growth, and improved transportation, favourable environments for the dengue fever vector Aedes aegypti have developed (2). Dengue has also become a matter of concern in rural areas of India, posing challenges for healthcare providers who need to manage this condition in resource-limited areas, where the at-risk population is often unaware of the warning signs and potential complications of dengue (3).

To mitigate the mortality and morbidity associated with dengue infection, it is important to understand the clinical profile of the disease, along with the laboratory parameters of dengue fever. An important indicator of dengue infection is the complete blood count. World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria (2011) define that certain components of the complete blood count, such as leukocytes, platelets, and haematocrit, are important for determining the clinical development of dengue (4). Platelet count and haematocrit are commonly used as indicators of dengue infection, while leukocyte count is less commonly used (5). Neutrophils and lymphocytes make up 80% of the leukocytes and play an active role in the body’s response to inflammation and infection, allowing for an immune response to be inferred from the proportion of these two cell types (6). NLR is also an important marker of inflammation that may be used in dengue fever; however, there are limited studies regarding its use in dengue fever (7). The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio is another marker of inflammation that has been used in predicting inflammation as well as mortality (8). A lower platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio has been linked to dengue fever, with thrombocytopenia being an important finding in dengue fever.

There have been only a few studies conducted on the use of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet ratios as indirect markers of inflammation and sepsis, particularly in viral infections (5),(6),(7). Recently, some readily available parameters from routine complete blood counts, such as NLR, NPR, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and mean platelet volume-to-platelet count ratio, have been investigated as potential biomarkers in bacterial sepsis. However, the results have been mixed, and there is no consensus yet regarding their accuracy and clinical usefulness (8),(9),(10).

Therefore, these ratios can potentially serve as potent markers of inflammation in both bacterial and viral infections, indicating more severe infection or adverse outcomes. The present study was conducted to highlight the significance of NLR, NPR, and NLPR in predicting outcomes in patients with dengue infection.

Material and Methods

A retrospective observational study was conducted in rural central India in the Department of Medicine at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College in Wardha, Maharashtra, India, from June 2021 to December 2021. All analysis and study compilation were conducted during the period from January to April 2022. The study was conducted after receiving approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), with certificate number DMIMS(DU)/IEC/2021/1230. All the patients enrolled for dengue infection were diagnosed using the BIOLINE dengue duo rapid test (Non-structural antigen 1 and immunoglobulin IgM/IgG). The data used for the present study was retrieved from the medical records of all the patients who were admitted during that period for dengue fever and fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria: The study population consisted of adult patients (18 years old and above) infected with the dengue virus, confirmed by Nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) antigen or IgM antibody positive for dengue, from June 2021 to December 2021 were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a past history of dengue or any other arbovirus infection, paediatric patients, pregnant patients, patients with chronic renal failure, malignancy, chronic liver diseases such as cirrhosis, immunodeficient states such as long-term corticosteroid therapy/organ transplantation or acquired immune deficiency, and other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The complete data for the patients’ complete blood counts who met the inclusion criteria was extracted from the Coulter reports. The parameters included in the study were Haemoglobin (Hb), Red Blood Cell (RBC), White Blood Cells (WBC), and its components such as neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet, Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), haematocrit, Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC), and Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW).

Clinical parameters, including age, sex, symptoms, and laboratory results collected upon admission, were retrieved.

Sample size calculation: The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute count for neutrophils by the absolute count for lymphocytes. NPR was calculated as neutrophil count (×109 L)×1000/platelet count (×109/L). Finally, NLPR was calculated using the following formula: NLPR: (Neutrophil count × 100)/(Lymphocyte count × Platelet count) (11). The flow diagram of the study is highlighted in (Table/Fig 1).

The primary outcome of the study was to assess the severity or final outcome (death and discharge) in dengue patients based on NLR, NPR, and NLPR. The secondary outcome was to assess the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of these parameters in dengue patients.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistical analysis was performed to calculate the means with corresponding Standard Deviations (SD). A test of proportion was used to find the Standard Normal Deviate (Z) to compare the difference in proportions, and a Chi-square test was performed to find associations. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find the Area Under the Curve (AUC), followed by the Youden method to determine the cut-off value of different parameters for outcomes. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software, version 21.0, manufactured by International Business Machine (IBM), Chicago, United States of America (USA).


A total of 540 patients with dengue fever were included in the present observational study. The mean age of the patients was 29.85±13.40 years, with a range of 18-85 years and a median age of 25 years. There were significantly more patients below the age of 30 years (331 patients, 61.7%) compared to patients aged 30 and above (209 patients, 38.3%) (Z=3.39, p=0.0007). The mean age of male patients was 29±12.4 years, while that of female patients was 31.6±14.9 years. The proportion of male patients (330 patients, 61.1%) was significantly higher than that of female patients (210 patients, 38.9%) (Z=3.11, p=0.0018). Other baseline parameters of patients with dengue fever are highlighted in (Table/Fig 2).

Neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and NLR were significantly associated with the outcome (p<0.001). However, the association of platelet count and NPR with the outcome was statistically insignificant (p=0.10, p=0.044, respectively). A comparison of various parameters among patients who died during treatment versus discharged patients is highlighted in (Table/Fig 3). The AUC for NLR was higher than the AUC for NLPR and NPR, indicating that NLR was more effective in predicting adverse outcomes. However, the efficacies of NLR and NLPR were similar. The area under the ROC curve for NLR in predicting adverse outcomes (death) was 0.852, while it was 0.828 for NLPR and 0.708 for NPR, as shown in (Table/Fig 4). NLR had the highest diagnostic accuracy of 90.93% with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 91.2%. NLPR had the lowest diagnostic accuracy of 53.15% with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 52.90%, as shown in (Table/Fig 5).


According to estimates by the WHO, the rates of dengue infection have increased significantly by thirtyfold in the last five decades. This increase can be attributed to its complex pathophysiology, ecological problems, and economic issues (12).

In the present study, the proportion of males (330, 61.1%) was found to be significantly higher than that of females (210, 38.9%). This difference may be due to male members of rural families engaging more in outdoor activities, thus being more exposed to the mosquito vector for dengue. Similar findings were also reported by Patil PS et al., where 59.3% of dengue patients were male, and by Gupta E et al., where the frequency of dengue fever was higher in males than females in Delhi, India [13,14]. In the present study, the mean age of the patients was 29.85±13.40 years, with a median age of 25 years. A total of 331 (61.7%) patients were below the age of 30, significantly higher than the patients aged 30 and above (38.3%). Different findings were reported by Patil PS et al., where the majority of dengue patients belonged to the age group of 31-40 years, and by Yuditya D and Sudirgo I, where the majority of dengue patients belonged to the age group of 17 to 25 years (13),(15).

Dengue infection is commonly associated with leukopenia, which in turn is a potent marker of the critical phase of illness. In the critical phase of dengue fever, there is a decline in leukocyte count, generally below 5000 cells/mm3 (15). This is also associated with a change in the neutrophil count, such that the neutrophil count decreases more than lymphocytes, further changing the NLR (15). This indicates an upcoming critical phase of dengue fever, which is associated with plasma leakage. This is a relatively early change that precedes the changes in platelet count and haematocrit (15). A relative increase in lymphocyte count, along with atypical lymphocytes, is usually observed in the later febrile stage or during the recovery phase of dengue (15). The decrease in neutrophil count or neutropenia results from viral infection leading to apoptosis of neutrophils. Another theory suggests that neutrophils encapsulate platelets positive for dengue viral antigen through neutrophil extracellular traps, signifying that neutropenia seen in dengue patients may be a defense mechanism of the host against the dengue virus (16).

Thrombocytopenia is a common laboratory finding in dengue fever. It usually reaches its peak in the critical phase of dengue fever and then resolves in the recovery phase. Thrombocytopenia seen in dengue fever can result from increased destruction of platelets or a decrease in the production of platelets by the bone marrow. Another mechanism of thrombocytopenia can be immune-mediated destruction of platelets coated with antibodies. This is due to the cross-reactivity among antibodies formed against NS1 antigen and platelets (17). One of the other postulated mechanisms is complement-mediated platelet clearance (18).

The NLR, NPR, and neutrophil-lymphocyte-platelet ratio calculated in the present study were 0.33±0.28, 110.59±136.23, and 533±765.8, respectively. The AUC was highest for NLR, making it the best marker out of the three for predicting the outcome in dengue fever. It had a diagnostic accuracy of 90.93%, sensitivity of 60%, and specificity of 91.21%. The findings of the present study were similar to the study conducted by Yuditya D and Sudirgo I, where NLR was significantly associated with dengue severity (p-value=0.000, p<0.05) (15). However, different findings were reported by Athira PP et al., where there was no significant difference in NLR between dengue and non dengue patients (19).

In a study conducted by Osuna-Ramos JF et al., it was concluded that NLPR had low diagnostic accuracy in Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) and dengue fever (57.14%). Their study revealed that NLPR was independently associated with COVID-19 with a good fit predictive value (p=0.1041). The NLR (AUC=0.88, 95% CI=0.84-0.91) was able to discriminate COVID-19 from dengue with high sensitivity and specificity values (above 80%) (20). In the present study as well, a high diagnostic accuracy of NLR (90.93%) and NPR (75.19%) but low diagnostic accuracy of NLPR (53.15%) was seen in predicting the outcome of dengue fever.

Another important aspect of the present study was the increased NLR (0.66±0.26; p<0.04 significant) seen in adverse outcomes compared to discharged patients. This contrasts the findings of Yuditya D and Sudirgo I, where it was reported that a lower NLR is associated with higher severity of dengue fever (15). The present might be explained by the fact that neutropenia occurs around the fifth day of admission (21), and the complete blood count in the present study was taken upon admission. Therefore, initially, a high NLR is seen in dengue fever, which eventually gets reversed. This study signifies that an initial high NLR on admission is also associated with adverse outcomes in dengue fever. Further studies conducted on a large scale can help verify the findings of the present study, thereby establishing NLR as an early marker of adverse outcomes in dengue fever.


The sample size of the current study was relatively small, requiring further studies with a larger sample size to validate the findings. Additionally, the complete blood count could not be repeated serially due to the retrospective observational study design.


The NLR is an important early predictor of outcome in dengue fever, which can be used by physicians in rural set-ups to decide upon admission criteria or for the decision of referral to equipped centres, as changes in white blood cells precede changes in platelet counts and haematocrit.


Kotepui M, PhunPhuech B, Phiwklam N, Uthaisar K. Differentiating between dengue fever and malaria using hematological parameters in endemic areas of Thailand. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6(1):27. [crossref][PubMed]
Gubler DJ. Dengue, urbanization and globalization: The unholy trinity of the 21st Century. Trop Med Health. 2011;39(4 Suppl):03-11. [crossref][PubMed]
Tauil PL. Urbanization and dengue ecology. Cad Saude Publica. 2001;17:99-102. [crossref][PubMed]
World Health Organisation: South-East Asia Regional Office. Comprehensive guidelines for prevention and control of dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. WHO Regional Office for South East Asia; 2011.
Shah D, Talwar D, Kumar S, Acharya S. Platelet indices: Is it a reliable biomarker in viral infections? J Datta Meghe Inst Med Sci Univ. 2023;18(2):322-26. [crossref]
Rehman FU, Khan A, Aziz A, Iqbal M, Mahmood Sbz, Ali N, et al. Neutrophils to lymphocyte ratio: Earliest and efficacious markers of sepsis. Cureus. 2020;12(10):e10851. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.10851. [crossref]
Martins EC, Silveira LDF, Viegas K, Beck AD, FioravanttiJúnior G, Cremonese RV, et al. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in the early diagnosis of sepsis in an intensive care unit: A case-control study. Rev Bras TerIntensiva. 2019;31(1):64-70. Doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190010. [crossref]
Dubey A, Kumar S, Acharya S, Wanjari A, Bawankule S, Agrawal S, et al. Impact of red cell and platelet distribution width in patients of medical intensive care unit. J Lab Physicians. 2021;13(4):309-16. [crossref][PubMed]
Gameiro J, Fonseca JA, Jorge S, Gouveia J, Lopes JA. Neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet ratio as a predictor of mortality in septic-acute kidney injury patients. Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2020;40(4):461-68. English, Spanish. Doi: 10.1016/j. nefro.2019.11.006. [crossref]
Shi Y, Yang C, Chen L, Cheng M, Xie W. Predictive value of neutrophil-to- lymphocyte and platelet ratio in in-hospital mortality in septic patients. Heliyon. 2022;8(11):e11498. Doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11498. [crossref][PubMed]
Forget P, Khalifa C, Defour JP, Latinne D, Van Pel MC, De Kock M. What is the normal value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio? BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):12. Published 2017 Jan 3. Doi:10.1186/s13104-016-2335-5. [crossref][PubMed]
Ralapanawa U, Alawattegama ATM, Gunrathne M, Tennakoon S, Kularatne SAM, Jayalath T. Value of peripheral blood count for dengue severity prediction. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):400. [crossref][PubMed]
Patil PS, Chandi DH, Damke S, Mahajan S, Ashok R, Basak S. A retrospective study of clinical and laboratory profile of dengue fever in tertiary care hospital, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2020;14(3):1935-39. https:// [crossref]
Gupta E, Dar L, Kapoor G, Broor S. The changing epidemiology of dengue in Delhi, India. Virol J. 2006;3:92. [crossref][PubMed]
Yuditya D, Sudirgo I. The relation between Neutrophil Lymphocyte Count Ratio (NLCR) and dengue infection grade of severity in adult patients in RS Muhammadiyah Ahmad Dahlan Kediri in January 2019. STRADA Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan, 2020;9(1):20-25. [crossref]
Opasawatchai A, Amornsupawat P, Jiravejchakul N, Chan-In W, Spoerk NJ, Manopwisedjaroen K, et al. Neutrophil activation and early features of NET formation are associated with dengue virus infection in human. Front Immunol. 2019;9:3007. [crossref][PubMed]
Boo YL, Lim SY, P’ng HS, Liam C, Huan NC. Persistent thrombocytopenia following dengue fever: What should we do? Malays Fam Physician. 2019;14(3):71-73. Published 2019 Dec 31.
Lin CF, Lei HY, Liu CC, Liu HS, Yeh TM, Wang ST, et al. Generation of IgM anti- platelet autoantibody in dengue patients. J Med Virol. 2001;63(2):143-49. 3.0.CO;2-L>[crossref][PubMed]
Athira PP, Jagan OA, Umadevi P, Pragnatha K, Veena PM. A retrospective study of paediatric dengue cases in a tertiary care hospital in southern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12(7):SC01-SC06. [crossref]
Osuna-Ramos JF, Reyes-Ruiz JM, Ochoa-Ramírez LA, De Jesús-González LA, Ramos-Payán R, Farfan-Morales CN, et al. The usefulness of peripheral blood cell counts to distinguish COVID-19 from dengue during acute infection. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7(2):20. Doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7020020. [crossref][PubMed]
Chaloemwong J, Tantiworawit A, Rattanathammethee T, Hantrakool S, Chai- Adisaksopha C, Rattarittamrong E, et al. Useful clinical features and hematological parameters for the diagnosis of dengue infection in patients with acute febrile illness: A retrospective study. BMC Hematol. 2018;18:20. Published 2018 Aug 29. Doi:10.1186/s12878-018-0116-1.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65292.18658

Date of Submission: May 07, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 02, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 02, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: May 08, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 03, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 30, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin


JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)