Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 607

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : OC05 - OC12 Full Version

Correlation of Mother’s Knowledge on Child Nutrition, Feeding Practices and Nutritional Status of Children in Karnataka, India: A Cross-sectional Study

Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI:
Preema Reshma Pinto, Priya Reshma Aranha, Melba Roshini Lobo

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Child Health Nursing, Yenepoya Nursing College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Child Health Nursing, Yenepoya Nursing College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Child Health Nursing, Yenepoya Nursing College, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Priya Reshma Aranha,
Associate Professor, Department of Child Health Nursing, Yenepoya Nursing College, Yenepoya Deemed to be University, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.


Introduction: Malnutrition is a critical health problem in many countries, including India. The main reason for this is incorrect dietary habits that lead to illness and infections in early childhood. Inadequate food intake can hinder the growth and development of children. Childhood malnutrition can impair psychological and intellectual development, which can subsequently result in low school performance and behavioural disturbances. Therefore, child nutrition is of utmost importance. The knowledge and feeding practices of mothers can significantly influence child nutrition. Hence, it is essential to study the knowledge, feeding practices, and nutritional status of children as influenced by their mothers.

Aim: To was to determine the correlation between the knowledge of mothers regarding child nutrition, their feeding practices, and the nutritional status of children.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted in a 1050-bed multispecialty tertiary care hospital in Mangaluru, Karnataka, India, from December 30, 2021, to August 30, 2022. A total of 150 children under the age of five, visiting the hospital accompanied by their mothers, were selected as study participants using a non probability convenience sampling technique. Data was collected using a demographic proforma, a structured knowledge questionnaire on child nutrition, a structured checklist on feeding practices, and anthropometric measurements of children, which were taken using a digital weighing scale and stadiometer. Descriptive statistics including mean, frequency, percentage, Karl Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and World Health Organisation (WHO) Anthro software were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The majority of the study participants, 96 (64%), had average knowledge regarding child nutrition, while all of them had good child feeding practices. Regarding the nutritional status of the children, the majority fell under the normal category based on weight for height (123, 82%), weight for age (118, 78.67%), and height for age (104, 69.33%). The study also revealed a significant correlation between the knowledge of mothers, feeding practices, and nutritional status of children (p-value <0.05).

Conclusion: The study concluded that although majority of the study participants had a normal nutritional status and their mothers had average knowledge, regular awareness programs could be conducted, and the nutritional status of children needs to be regularly monitored.


Behavioural disturbance, Health problem, Infection, Malnutrition

It is essential to have good feeding practices of infant and toddler to maintain the health, growth, and development of children (1). Developing healthy eating habits early in life prevents diet-related diseases later on and in adulthood. The development of food preferences in children is complex. Familial and environmental factors affect food preferences, but they may not always promote a healthy and varied dietary practice. Parents employ a variety of strategies to influence the eating habits of children, some of which may be effective, while others may not be (2).

Malnutrition is a major health issue in developing countries. It can manifest in the form of both overnutrition and undernutrition. Across the world, undernutrition is the most common form of malnutrition, resulting from insufficient food intake and recurrent infections (3). In India, nearly half of all under-five child mortality is attributed to undernutrition (4). Malnutrition accounts for 45% of mortality among under-five children globally, as it increases the risk of death by exacerbating the frequency and severity of infections and slowing recovery (5). According to the Global Nutrition Report 2018, in India, 8.23 million children under the age of five are both stunted and wasted, and 46.6 million children are stunted, accounting for 33% of the world’s total (6). Child malnutrition is a concern in many countries as it is one of the causes of under-five mortality (7),(8),(9). The Fourth National Family Health Survey in 2015-2016 reported that 32.1% of under-five children were underweight, 35.5% were stunted, and 19.3% were wasted, which was lower compared to the survey conducted in 2005-2006 (10). This indicates that malnutrition is decreasing in under-five children but still persists.

Much research has been conducted in the area of child malnutrition, and guidelines for evidence-based practice. A randomised controlled trial has shown that home-based therapeutic food is more effective in terms of better acceptability, palatability, affordability, increased frequency of feeding, and ease of preparation (p-value<0.05) (10). On the other hand, a study in India has shown that only 39 (38.8%) of infants were breastfeed within one hour of birth, even after institutional delivery. Exclusive breastfeeding for six months was reported in only 26 (30.6%) infants. The study concluded that Infant and Young Child Feeding practices (IYCF) in India are extremely poor, which may be due to lower literacy rates, lack of IYCF education among mothers, and a lack of counseling and support (11).

A cross-sectional study in Karnataka revealed that 136 (39%) mothers initiated breastfeeding within half an hour of childbirth. A total of 31 (9%) of them reported giving prelactea feeds. Only 91 (26%) of the mothers were found to be providing the WHO recommended minimum adequate diet to their children. The study highlighted the prevalence of inappropriate IYCF practices in the community (12).

Recent research has demonstrated that the period before a child reaches 18 months of age is essential for preventing and treating iron-deficiency anaemia. This suggests that the effects of poor feeding practices during this stage of a child’s life may have long-term impacts on their development and health status (13).

It is evident from the above discussion that the burden of malnutrition among children under the age of five is relatively high. Despite various government projects carried out in Karnataka and throughout the country, the prevalence of undernutrition has not reduced significantly. There are many factors that influence the nutritional status of children, such as cooking and child-rearing practices, likes or dislikes of food, beliefs or taboos, and the quality and quantity of the food served (13). The literature shows that malnutrition still exists as a major health problem in India, with faulty feeding practices being the main cause among children under the age of five (13). Many research studies have explored mothers’ knowledge regarding nutrition and the nutritional status of children. A mother’s knowledge of child nutrition is also important for the nutritional status of children. Therefore, the present study was conducted to find the correlation between mothers’ knowledge of child nutrition, feeding practices, and the nutritional status of children.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted at a 1050-bed multispecialty tertiary care hospital in Mangaluru, Karnataka, India, from December 30, 2021, to August 30, 2022. Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC), and permission was obtained from the concerned hospital authority (Approval protocol number: YEC2/835). Informed consent was obtained from the study participants.

Inclusion criteria: Under-five children, both males and females, visiting the Outpatient Department (OPD) or admitted to the paediatric ward, along with their mothers, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Critically ill children and mothers who were physically or mentally disturbed were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was estimated based on the prevalence of mothers’ knowledge regarding feeding practices for infants (p=0.25%), considering a significance level of 5% and a study precision of 7% around the specified prevalence (14). The recommended sample size for the present study was 150.

Data collection: Data were collected using a demographic proforma, a structured knowledge questionnaire on child nutrition, a structured checklist on feeding practices, and anthropometric measurements of children taken using a digital weighing scale and stadiometer. The demographic proforma consisted of eleven items related to demographic data for children and their mothers, including the child’s age, gender, birth order, religion, type of family, family income, mother’s education, socio-economic condition, and information regarding child nutrition. The structured knowledge questionnaire consisted of 40 questions classified under four domains: a) nutrients and requirements, balanced diet; b) importance of child nutrition; c) nutritional deficiency, malnutrition; and d) factors affecting child nutrition. The questionnaire was validated by subject experts and was found to be reliable (r=0.83). The investigators arbitrarily graded the knowledge as good (27-40), average (14-26), or poor (<14) based on the scores obtained. The structured checklist on feeding practices consisted of 39 statements categorised under five domains: a) breastfeeding; b) weaning; c) hand hygiene/food hygiene; d) follow-up of nutritional status; and e) method of cooking. The checklist was validated by subject experts and was 6found to be reliable (r=0.99). Practices were arbitrarily graded as good (scores ≥20) or poor (scores <20).

For the anthropometric assessment of children, a calibrated digital weighing scale was used to measure weight, and a stadiometer was used to measure height. The nutritional status of the children was then assessed based on WHO growth standards (15) using WHO Anthro software Version 1.0.4. and described as follows: Underweight (weight for age <-2SD, indicating changes in the magnitude of malnutrition over time), Stunting (height for age <-2SD, indicating growth retardation), and Wasting (weight for height <-2SD, indicating inadequate nutrition).

Study Procedure

Formal permission was obtained from the concerned hospital authority to conduct the study, and informed consent was obtained from the participants. The questionnaire was administered to the participants, and it took approximately 45-50 minutes for them to complete it [Annexure I]. The investigator ensured that the tool was completely filled out by the participants. At the same time, the investigator measured the height and weight of the children and recorded the data. Finally, the investigator thanked the study participants for their participation.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. Descriptive statistics of knowledge and practice regarding child nutrition were analysed in terms of frequency and percentage. The nutritional status of the children was analysed using WHO Anthro software. Karl Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to identify correlations between the mother’s knowledge on child nutrition, feeding practices, and the nutritional status of the children.


(Table/Fig 1) describes the demographic characteristics of the study participants. In addition to this data, all the participants had a ration card, and 89 (59.3%) belonged to below the poverty line. The mean age of the children in completed months was 33.23±13.87, and the mean age of the mothers in completed years was 28.51±16.3.

(Table/Fig 2) depicts the knowledge of mothers regarding child nutrition. The study revealed that the mean percentage of the subjects’ knowledge was 57.7%. The domain-wise mean percentage of knowledge on nutrients and requirements, balanced diet was 65.22%, the importance of child nutrition was 56.87%, nutritional deficiency and malnutrition was 52.22%, and factors affecting child nutrition was 48%.

It was also observed that all the study participants had good feeding practices as they responded positively to the practice checklist. The mean percentage of the mothers’ practice was 83.64%. The domain-wise mean percentage of practice on breastfeeding was 95.54%, weaning was 69%, food hygiene was 97%, follow-up of nutritional status was 88.51%, and methods of cooking was 85.20%.

When comparing the nutritional status of the children with the WHO growth standards, it was found that 118 (78.66%) children had a normal weight for age (Table/Fig 3), 104 (69.33%) had a normal height for age (Table/Fig 4), and 123 (82%) had a normal height for weight (Table/Fig 5). However, 32 (21%) were found to be wasted, 17 (11%) were underweight, and 33 (22%) were stunted.

Karl Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between the mother’s knowledge on child nutrition, feeding practices, and the nutritional status of the children. The study results showed a positive correlation between the mother’s knowledge and feeding practices (r-value=0.72, p-value<0.05), the mother’s knowledge and nutritional status (r-value=0.11, p-value<0.05), and feeding practices and nutritional status (r-value=0.37, p-value<0.05).


In the present study, 78 (52%) of the children were male, and 57 (38%) belonged to the first and second order of birth. Additionally, 50 (33.3%) of the mothers had primary education, 121 (80.7%) were housewives, 103 (68.7%) belonged to nuclear families, and 89 (59.3%) were below the poverty line. These findings are consistent with previous studies, where 229 (57.3%) of the subjects were male (16), 140 (34.9%) of the mothers were housewives (15), 11 (57%) belonged to nuclear families, and 383 (76.6%) had a poor socio-economic condition (17),(18).

The present study showed that the majority, 96 (64%), of the mothers had average knowledge regarding child nutrition. A similar study showed that mothers had good knowledge on IYCF recommendations (19), while another study contradicted this finding, showing that the majority, 321 (64.2%), of the mothers had inadequate knowledge about Complementary Feeding (CF) (17). The main reason for this discrepancy could be that the population in the latter study was from an urban slum where personal and environmental sanitation was very poor, and people were ignorant about child nutrition and health (18).

In the present study, it was observed that all the mothers had good feeding practices regarding child nutrition. The mean percentage of the practice score was 109 (72.7%). However, a similar study conducted showed contradictory findings, with mothers exhibiting poor feeding practices regarding child nutrition (20). The mothers and their children in that study consumed a lot of fast food and lacked nutritional education, which could lead to poor feeding practices (20).

Regarding the nutritional status of the children, the present study revealed that the majority of the children were well-nourished. However, 32 (21%) were found to be wasted, 17 (11%) were underweight, and 33 (22%) were stunted. A similar study found that 204 (26%) of the study participants were undernourished, 102 (13%) were stunted, 94 (12%) were wasted, and 78 (1%) were both stunted and wasted (21). The investigators also compared the present study findings with the literature, where contrasting study findings were found (Table/Fig 6) (19),(20),(21),(22). The main reason for this difference may be the low socio-economic status of the mothers.


The feeding practice was assessed through verbal responses by the mother, but the actual practice was not observed by the researcher. The study was limited to a single setting in a single geographical area; therefore, the generalisation of study findings was not possible.


This study finding suggests that mothers had average knowledge and good child feeding practices, and the majority of the children were well nourished. There was a positive correlation between knowledge, feeding practices, and nutritional status. The current study will provide important information for future research in the area of child nutrition and malnutrition among children, as well as the knowledge and practices of mothers. The outcomes of this study can be used by researchers to perform interventional research, exploring and testing various interventions to maintain the nutritional status of under-five children and enhance their mothers’ knowledge and practices regarding child nutrition.


The authorities of Yenepoya Medical College Hospital are to be commended for providing all the necessary technical and other assistance for the completion of this research project. The authors also wish to thank all the validators for their help in construction the tool, as well as all the study participants for their wholehearted support.


Gidding S, Dennison BA, Birch L, Daniels SR, Gillman MW, Lichtenstein AH, et al. Dietary recommendations for children and adolescents: A guide for practitioners: Consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circ. 2015;112(13):2061-75. [crossref][PubMed]
Scaglioni S, Salvioni M, Galimberti C. Influence of parental attitudes in the development of children eating behaviour. Br J Nutr. 2008;99(Suppl 1):S22-25. [crossref][PubMed]
UNICE. Progress for children. [Internet]. [Cited on 2020 December 28]. Available from:
Shrimpton R, Victora CG, Onis DM, Lima RC, Blossner M, Clugston G. Worldwide timing of growth faltering: Implications for nutritional interventions. Pediatrics. 2001;107(5):E75. [crossref][PubMed]
Global Health Observatory Data. 2020. Child malnutrition and mortality. [Internet] [Cited on January 2022]. Available from:
The burden of malnutrition. [Internet]. [Cited on January 2022]. Available from: [crossref]
Vitoria CG, Adair L, Fall C, Hallal P, Martorell R, Richter L, et al. Maternal and child under-nutrition: Consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet. 2008;371(9609):342-57. [crossref][PubMed]
Global Nutrition report 2020. [Internet]. [Cited on January 2022]. Available from:
Kar BR, Rao SL, Chandramouli B. Cognitive development in children with chronic protein energy malnutrition. Behav Brain Funct. 2008;4(31):01-12. [crossref][PubMed]
National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4), 2015-16: India. [internet]. [Cited on January 2022]. Available from:
Khandelwal S, Kondal D, Chakravarti AR, Dutta S, Banerjee B, Chaudhry M, et al. Infant young child feeding practices in an Indian maternal-child birth cohort in Belagavi, Karnataka. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(9):5088. [crossref][PubMed]
Davalgi S, Vidya GS. A study to know infant and young child feeding practices of mothers attending mother and child health clinic at a tertiary care teaching hospital, Davangere, India. IJCMPH. 2015;2(4):478-83. [crossref]
Yue A, Marsh L, Zhou H, Medina A, Luo R, Shi Y, et al. Nutritional deficiencies, the absence of information and caregiver short comings: A qualitative analysis of infant feeding practices in rural China. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0153385. [crossref][PubMed]
Haileslassie K, Mulugeta A, Girma M. Feeding practices, nutritional status and associated factors of lactating women in Samre Woreda, South Eastern Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia. Nutr J. 2013;12:28. Doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-12-28. [crossref][PubMed]
Child Growth standards. WHO 2023. [Internet]. [Cited on June 2023]. Available from:
Mafuko, Justin B. Relationship between feeding practices and nutritional status of children under the age of two years in Mugunga, Democratic Republic of Congo. African Digital Health Library. 2019. [Internet]. [Cited on December 2021]. Available from:
Uusimäki K, Schneider L, Lubeka C, Kimiwye J, Mutanen M. Mothers’ knowledge and practices on breastfeeding and complementary feeding in an urban slum area and rural area in Kenya: A cross-sectional interview study [published online ahead of print, 2022 Apr 15]. J Child Health Care. 2022. Doi: 10.1177/13674935221083451. [crossref][PubMed]
Bhavsar S, Hemant M, Kulkarni R. Maternal and environmental factors affecting the nutritional status of children in Mumbai Urban Slum. Int J Sci Res. 2012;2(11):01-09. [Internet]. [Cited on January 2022]. Available from:
Memon S, Shaikh S, Kousar T, Memon Y, Rubina. Assessment of infant feeding practices at a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010;60(12):1010-15.
Yabanci N, Kisac I, Karakus S. The Effects of Mother's Nutritional Knowledge on Attitudes and Behaviors of Children about Nutrition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;116:4477-81.[crossref]
Safari JG, Kimambo SC, Lwelamira JE. Feeding practices and nutritional status of infants in Morogoro Municipality, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res. 2013;15(3):178-85. [crossref][PubMed]
Joshi HS, Gupta R, Joshi MC, Mahajan V. Determinants of nutritional status of school children a cross sectional study in the Western Region of Nepal: Children. NJIRM. 2011;2(1):10-15.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64983.18661

Date of Submission: Apr 25, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 13, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: May 03, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 04, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 02, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin


JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)