Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 125830

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : QD01 - QD03 Full Version

Rare Case of Bladder Endometriosis in a Post-hysterectomy Patient

Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI:
Rajasi Kane Sengupta, Saunitra Inamdar, Surekha Tayade

1. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Datta Meghe Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Datta Meghe Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Rajasi Kane Sengupta,
Ravinagar Square, Amravati Road, Nagpur Nagpur-440033, Maharashtra, India.


Bladder endometriosis, a rare but well-known condition with a high risk of morbidity, affects the bladder. A 43-year-old woman presented with a history of recurrent cyclical discomfort during urination. The patient had undergone a non descent vaginal hysterectomy to address the same symptom. Upon examination, a nodule was discovered between the bladder and vaginal vault. The diagnosis of bladder endometriosis was confirmed through cystoscopy and an Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The nodule was removed via transurethal resection, and histology confirmed it as endometriosis. After 12 months of follow-up, the patient's postoperative symptoms had completely resolved. Hormonal therapy was initiated, and there were no residual urinary symptoms, chronic pain, or cyclical pain. Women reporting urinary symptoms, particularly those with a history of pelvic surgery, should undergo evaluation for bladder endometriosis. The diagnosis of bladder endometriosis should be considered in women experiencing dysuria and bladder discomfort. A high index of suspicion is required to establish the diagnosis.


Bladder nodule, Cystoscopy, Urinary symptoms

Case Report

A 43-year-old Para 2 Living 2 (P2L2) presented to the Outpatient Department (OPD) with complaints of recurrent cyclical pain during urination for almost five years. The patient did not have a history of blood in her urine or abdominal pain. Five years ago, patient underwent a non descent vaginal hysterectomy to relieve pelvic pain. However, the pain became cyclical and gradually increased over time. The history and general examination were otherwise unremarkable. On per speculum examination, a cervical stump and a nodule protruding into the vagina, anterior to the stump, measuring 2-3 cm in size, were observed. Per vaginum examination revealed that the nodule had a firm to hard consistency and originated between the bladder and the vaginal vault. It was fixed to the vaginal mucosa and had an irregular outline. The cervical stump felt adherent to the anterior vaginal wall. The urine report indicated the presence of only a few pus cells upon microscopy, and after a culture was performed, E.coli was found. The antibiotic sensitivity report determined the appropriate antibiotics for treatment. Ultrasonography showed a 2-3 cm mass behind the bladder in the region of the vault (Table/Fig 1).

Cystoscopy revealed a 2-3 cm mass in the trigonal area that extended into the bladder. The bladder mucosa above the mass was intact. Pelvic MRI confirmed bladder wall endometriosis and residual cervical stump. Both ovaries appeared unremarkable. With proper informed risk consent, transurethal resection of the mass was performed. Both ureteral openings were identified and found to be normal and patent. The rest of the urinary bladder was unremarkable (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6).

Histopathology of the shavings revealed bladder endometriosis (Table/Fig 7). The patient had a comfortable postoperative period with mild haematuria for 24 hours, which subsided with intravenous infusion of 1 gm Tranexamic acid. Antibiotics were continued until the third day after the operation, as per the urine culture sensitivity report.

Postoperatively, the patient was started on subcutaneous injections of 3.6 mg Leuprolide acetate every 28 days for three cycles and oral Dienogest 2 mg twice daily for three months. At 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up, the patient experienced complete remission of symptoms. Follow-up showed no mass and a normal outline of the bladder. The patient had no residual urinary symptoms and no chronic or cyclical pelvic pain.


Endometriosis is known as an enigma. It has been referred to as ‘a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma’ (1). Endometriosis is a public health disorder that affects nearly 42 million women in India, with a significant socio-economic impact (2). Discussion and disagreement have long surrounded its diagnosis and treatment. Several theories on its possible aetiopathogenesis have been proposed and refuted over time. In fact, despite more than a century of study, the aetiology of endometriosis is still poorly understood. While significant progress has been made, there are still several significant knowledge gaps regarding endometriosis, which have hindered the development of a definitively proven treatment for this disease that profoundly affects the quality of life of countless women worldwide.

The symptomatology of endometriosis tends to be vague, and a high index of suspicion is needed to confirm the diagnosis. The classic triad of endometriosis is dyspareunia, dysmenorrhoea, and infertility. However, this triad often oversimplifies a complex disease that has been causing chronic pain and infertility for centuries (3). Endometriosis is a major cause of nonmenstrual pain and infertility in women, significantly impacting their quality of life (4).

Endometriosis is traditionally classified into one of three main forms: ovarian endometriosis, superficial peritoneal endometriosis, and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE). Bladder endometriosis is characterised by the abnormal proliferation of endometrial glands and stroma in the detrusor muscle of the bladder (5). This condition can affect various sites within the bladder, most commonly the base and dome, with varying degrees of infiltration. Urinary tract endometriosis is present in approximately 1% of women with endometriosis, but its prevalence increases to 19-53% among patients with Erectile Dysfunction (ED) (6). There are two types of bladder endometriosis: superficial endometriosis, which affects only the bladder surface, and deep endometriosis, which involves the bladder wall or lining. Bladder nodules often co-exist with other deep pelvic endometriosis locations, leading to a range of abdominal and urogenital symptoms that may go unnoticed by medical professionals (5). Despite advancements in our understanding of the genetic and molecular development of endometriosis, the clinical approach to bladder lesions remains challenging and may require the use of various diagnostic tools to establish a comprehensive diagnostic work-up and guide appropriate treatment. The diagnosis is primarily made through cystoscopic exploration and histological analysis of samples obtained via electrofulguration (7). In certain cases, hormone therapy using Danazol or a Gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist may be beneficial. For optimal results, the lesion should be removed via Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumour (TURBT) or traditional surgery. Bladder endometriosis is a rare but well-recognised form of endometriosis that can occur in women who have undergone a hysterectomy.

Bladder endometriosis is a rare form of endometriosis that can occur after a hysterectomy. This case presented a diagnostic challenge due to two factors. Firstly, the patient's cervix had been left behind after a non descent vaginal hysterectomy performed at another hospital. Secondly, she had predominantly urinary symptoms even before her hysterectomy, which persisted and worsened over the past five years. These factors led us to suspect bladder endometriosis. The bladder nodule was likely densely adherent, making it impossible to access the anterior pouch and dissect the uterine vesical fold of the peritoneum to elevate the bladder. Therefore, the surgeon decided to leave behind the cervical stump and proceed with a subtotal hysterectomy. Additionally, both ovaries were preserved, possibly due to the patient's age being under 40 years at the time of the hysterectomy. The specific symptom of cyclic urinary pain raised a strong suspicion of endometriosis. After conducting thorough research, the diagnosis of bladder endometriosis was confirmed, and the patient received appropriate treatment. The diagnosis of bladder endometriosis is often delayed because the symptoms resemble those of other bladder conditions, such as urinary tract infections and interstitial cystitis (8).

Many times, in the rush of routine office work, one tends to dismiss patient complaints and proceed with predetermined management plan. It is crucial to remember, especially when offering surgical treatment, that listening to the patient's complaints can help avoid permanent organ loss, incorrect procedures, and potential lawsuits. According to traditional medical school teaching, it is important to elicit the patient's history in their own words. The specific reason for their visit to the hospital should be carefully noted, and a management plan, including treatment options, should be discussed and documented in our notes.

Bladder endometriosis is primarily a type of DIE. Therefore, proper surgical management involves complete removal of the tissue mass. Care must be taken to avoid damaging the bladder wall, sphincters, and ureteric orifices. The patency of both ureteric orifices should be confirmed at the beginning of the procedure, and preoperative ureteral stenting may be considered in selected cases. Deep infiltrating disease can affect the ureters, leading to blockages (9). The gold standard for diagnosing bladder endometriosis is a histopathological examination of the biopsy specimen. Treatment options for bladder endometriosis include hormonal therapy, such as oral contraceptive pills, progestins, Dienogest (a fourth-generation synthetic progestin), GnRH agonists (leuprolide acetate, Goserelin), Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulators (SPRMs), and gestrinone. Laparoscopic surgical excision of the endometrial nodules is necessary, and in cases of extensive or recurrent disease, a partial cystectomy may be required. The prognosis for bladder endometriosis is generally good with appropriate treatment.


The purpose of presenting this case is to emphasize that the diagnosis of bladder endometriosis should be considered in women experiencing symptoms of dysuria and bladder discomfort. A high index of suspicion is necessary to reach the diagnosis. Treatment options include hormonal therapy and surgical excision of the endometrial nodules. With appropriate treatment, the prognosis is generally good.


Guidone HC. The Womb Wanders Not: Enhancing Endometriosis Education in a Culture of Menstrual Misinformation. In: Bobel C, Winkler IT, Fahs B, Hasson KA, Kissling EA, Roberts TA, editors. The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Menstruation Studies [Internet]. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan; 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 9]. Available from: [crossref][PubMed]
Gajbhiye RK. Endometriosis and inflammatory immune responses: Indian experience. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1989. 2023;89(2):e13590. [crossref][PubMed]
Buescher EA, Nezhat C. Endometriosis: Diagnosis and treatment: From fingernails to the robot. Cureus [Internet]. 2012 Nov 21 [cited 2023 Apr 9]. Available from: [crossref]
Bulletti C, Coccia ME, Battistoni S, Borini A. Endometriosis and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27(8):441-47. [crossref][PubMed]
Saccardi C, Vitagliano A, Litta P. Bladder endometriosis: A summary of current evidence. Minerva Ginecol. 2017;69(5):468-76. [crossref][PubMed]
Gabriel B, Nassif J, Trompoukis P, Barata S, Wattiez A. Prevalence and management of urinary tract endometriosis: A clinical case series. Urology. 2011;78(6):1269-74. [crossref][PubMed]
Sampietro Crespo A, Fernández Duran AM, Ruiz Mondejar R, Fernández Gómez J, Zazo Romojaro AF, Gómez Rodríguez A, et al. Bladder endometriosis: A new case and review of the literature. Arch Esp Urol. 1995;48(3):314-17.
Butrick CW. Patients with chronic pelvic pain: Endometriosis or interstitial cystitis/ painful bladder syndrome? JSLS. 2007;11(2):182-89.
Bai Y, Li Y, Li Q, Zhao W. Severe ureteral endometriosis complicated with hydronephrosis: A case report. Am J Case Rep. 2022;23:e937172-1-7.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65201.18679

Date of Submission: May 03, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 08, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 02, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

• Plagiarism X-checker: May 10, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 26, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Aug 31, 2023 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin


JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)