Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 127128

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : November | Volume : 17 | Issue : 11 | Page : YC01 - YC05 Full Version

Role of Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilisation in Text Neck Syndrome: A Quasi-experimental Study

Published: November 1, 2023 | DOI:
Amita Aggarwal, Anuj Pawan Lahoti, Tushar J Palekar

1. Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Physiotherapist, Department of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor (Principal), Department of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Amita Aggarwal,
Flat no.1004, A Wing, Kamalraj Haridwar Society, Dighi-411015, Pune, Maharashtra, india.


Introduction: Text Neck Syndrome occurs due to sustained Forward Head Posture (FHP) when smartphones are used constantly without any breaks for more than five hours and with improper posture. Long-term untreated text neck can cause inflammation of the neck’s ligaments, muscles, and nerves, leading to chronic arthritic changes. Literature provides studies evaluating the effects of physical or manual therapy, but there is a lack of studies investigating the effects of Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilisation (IASTM) treatment in individuals with text neck syndrome.

Aim: To determine the added effect of IASTM on text neck syndrome.

Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Department of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Pune, Maharashtra, India, from August 2022 to December 2022. A total of 22 subjects, with a mean age of 21.58±1.18 years, participated in the study. The subjects were then divided into two treatment groups (n=11 each). The experimental group (Group-A) received stretching, strengthening exercises with IASTM, while the control group (Group-B) received only conventional physical therapy (stretching and strengthening). The treatment was delivered for a two-week period. The data were analysed using MedCalc statistical software version 20.210. Significance was set at a p-value less than 0.05. For within-group analysis, Wilcoxon’s signed-rank or paired t-test was used depending on the normality distribution, and for between-group comparisons, Mann-Whitney tests were used for skewed variables.

Results: The pain severity (p-value=0.0063) and neck disability (p-value=0.0008) were significantly lower in the IASTM group than the control group. Additionally, the Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) (p-value=0.0001) significantly increased with IASTM (Group-A) compared to the control group.

Conclusion: The study concluded that IASTM and conventional therapy are individually effective in improving pain, disability, and FHP in text neck syndrome. However, adding IASTM to routine physical therapy showed statistically more significant results compared to physical therapy alone in reducing neck pain, disability, and FHP.


Forward head posture, Neck pain, Repetitive stress, Turtle neck posture

Text neck syndrome is considered “Pain of the Modern Era” since it can cause acute to chronic pain in the neck and upper back (1). It is a term used to describe neck pain from using a mobile phone, tablet, or other wireless device excessively and for an extended period of time (2). Smartphone use commonly requires excessive neck flexion angle (1). This position, if maintained for a longer duration, can decrease the lordosis in the lower cervical vertebrae. As a result, posterior curvature increases in the upper thoracic vertebrae (3).

Forward Head Posture (FHP) affects a large percentage of the population and can result in significant neck pain (3). Studies suggest that individuals who used mobile/smartphones for Internet browsing and chatting had the greatest prevalence of neck discomfort complaints than those who used them for fewer than two hours each day (4). In a study by Kumari S et al., 62% of college students reported positive for neck disability with a greater propensity among female responders (1). Constant use of a smartphone at home without any breaks and with improper posture leads to musculoskeletal pain with greater discomfort in the neck and shoulder region (5). Also, head and neck flexion angles are higher while using smartphones than desktop or notebook computers. In the normal position, an adult head weighs between 4.5 and 5.5 kg (10 and 12 pounds). Different angles of forward head flexion directly impact the cervical spine. At 15° head flexion, around 12 kg of force is placed on the neck. This force rises to 18 kg at 30°, 22 kg at 45°, and 27 kg at 60° (6).

The functional ability and mobility of the neck are maintained by muscles including the scalene, rhomboids, and trapezius. The upper trapezius is the most affected by text neck syndrome (4). The levator scapulae muscle is also crucial in maintaining proper head and neck posture. To counteract the predisposition for forward flexion, the muscle stays continuously active. With neck pain and postural issues, the levator scapulae becomes hyperactive and tender over the superior-medial border of the scapula (7).

Long-term untreated text neck can cause inflammation of the neck’s ligaments, muscles, and nerves, which can result in chronic arthritic changes (8). For its conservative care, a variety of procedures are available, including posture correction, stretching, soft tissue therapy (9), and exercise routines. Manual therapy is a combination of hands-on therapy methods, such as soft tissue mobilisation and massage, and methods utilising therapeutic instruments, like stainless-steel tools, that enable clinical therapists to recognise and address soft tissue dysfunctions (10). IASTM helps mobilise scar tissue and myofascial adhesions as its deeper penetration stimulates connective tissue remodelling (11).

Adhesions and cross-linkages can be broken using the IASTM approach. In comparison to manual methods, moving the instrument puts more mechanical stress on the skin as it is compressed and then stretched. The activity of the compressed and stretched mechanosensitive neurons is anticipated to change due to increased skin deformation. There are various IASTM tools, such as Garston, hawk grips, functional and kinetic treatment, adhesion breakers, and facial abrasion techniques that have their own approach to treatment and instrument design, like material and shape of instruments (12).

Additionally, previous studies suggest that IASTM reduces local pain intensity, improves the pressure pain threshold, enhances muscle tissue flexibility, and increases the Range of Motion (ROM) of the mobilised muscle and alters neural activities [13,14]. The postural adaptations following connective tissue involvement can cause chronicity of neck pain and promote a vicious cycle of pain. The limitation of functional activities further compromises the quality of life. IASTM works on releasing connective tissue and promotes muscle lengthening. The study hypothesised that adding IASTM to conventional exercise can have an effect on pain, disability, and FHP in text neck syndrome. The aim of the study was to determine the added effect of IASTM on text neck syndrome. In particular, the primary objective of the present study was to find the effect of the combined application of IASTM with a therapeutic exercise program on neck pain as determined using CVA for text neck syndrome. The secondary objective was to find the effect on neck disability and forward head in text neck syndrome.

Material and Methods

This quasi-experimental study was conducted at Department of Physiotherapy, Dr. D.Y. Patil College of Physiotherapy, Pune, Maharashtra, India, from August 2022 to December 2022. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Sub-ethics Committee (DYPCPT/ISEC/45/2022).

Inclusion criteria: Both males and females, subjects using a smartphone for atleast two hours a day for more than six months, complaining of neck pain during and after the use of a smartphone. Age group: 18-24 years, with a minimum Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of 10%-48%, indicating mild to moderate disability (15),(16), upper cross syndrome, and subjects with smartphone addiction (SAS-SV Score ≥34) were included in the study (17).

Exclusion criteria: Participants who were not willing to participate, had undergone recent surgery, had spinal pathology or ankylosing spondylitis, had any open wound around the neck, had a history of cervical fracture or torticollis, or had any other condition that contraindicated the use of IASTM tools, such as skin sensitivity were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Patients with text neck syndrome who met the above inclusion criteria and provided written informed consent were included. A total of 22 subjects were recruited, with a mean age of 21.58±1.18 years. Assuming the mean and standard deviation of the numerical pain rating scale from a study conducted by Mahmood T et al., with a power of 80, a significant difference of 5, and a confidence interval of 95%, the sample size was calculated as 22 using WinPePi (version 11.65) (12).

Study Procedure

The subjects were allocated into the Experimental (Group-A) and Control (Group-B) groups. Group-A received IASTM (two times a week for two weeks, 4 sessions, with 90 to 120 seconds of IASTM on each muscle until hyperaemia occurred for each side, totalling nine minutes per session including one minute of rest after each muscle IASTM treatment) (18), along with conventional treatment. Group-B received only the conventional treatment protocol. Both groups received treatment for two weeks, with a total of 14 sessions. Pre and postintervention assessments of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index, and Craniovertebral Angle parameters were performed.

Conventional treatment: The conventional treatment involved the use of a Hydrocollator pack for 20 minutes. Stretching exercises were performed for the levator scapulae, upper trapezius, suboccipital musculature, and scalene muscles (18). Each stretch was repeated three times, holding for 30 seconds per muscle, totaling 6 minutes (19). Neck isometric exercises were performed for flexion, side bending, and rotations (19). Each exercise was repeated 15 times, holding for 7 seconds per day (20), totaling approximately 10 minutes.

IASTM technique: Prior to treatment, the skin around the neck is lubricated with a friction-free oil or gel, and the IASTM instrument, M2T blade, is cleansed with an alcohol pad. The tool is used to determine the precise points of restriction in the upper trapezius (21), levator scapulae (22), and suboccipital muscles (22). Then, while holding the instrument at a 45-degree angle, slow strokes were applied to the muscles. When the instrument slides across areas of irregular fibrosis of the underlying connective tissue, the clinician is able to identify changes in soft tissue consistency through vibrations of the instrument. After locating an adhesion, strokes were repeated for five minutes. The M2T blade is an ergonomically designed stainless steel tool made of 0.316 surgical grade steel (22) (Table/Fig 1).

Outcomes: Pre and post values for neck pain, disability, and Craniovertebral Angle (CVA), which measures Forward Head Posture (FHP), were assessed using the numerical pain rating scale, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Markus Bader ruler (MB ruler) software. The reliability of photographic postural analysis done using the MB ruler was >0.972 (23). In the NDI, a total of 10 sections were scored from 0 to 5, with 0 indicating no pain and 5 indicating the worst imaginable pain. The minimum and maximum score range from 0 to 50, where 0 points or 0% represents no activity limitations and 50 points or 100% represents complete activity limitation. To calculate the NDI percentage, the total score of the 10 sections was divided by 50 and converted to a percentage. Scoring was categorised as follows: 0-4 points (0-8%) for no disability, 5 to 14 points (10-28%) for mild disability, 15-24 points (30-48%) for moderate disability, 25-34 points (50-64%), and 35-50 points (70-100%) for complete disability (15),(16).

Statistical Analysis

After entering the data into Microsoft excel, the mean and Standard Deviation (SD) were calculated for each parameter. The normality of the data was analysed using the Shapiro-Wilk Test in MedCalc statistical software version 20.210. The data was determined to have a normal distribution if the p-value was greater than 0.05, and not normally distributed if the p-value was less than 0.05. Intragroup (within-group) comparisons were conducted using the paired sample t-test for the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and CVA, as these parameters were normally distributed. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (Z-test) was used for the Neck Disability Index (NDI), as the data was not normally distributed.

Inter-group (between-group) comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney test (U-test) for the NPRS, NDI, and CVA, which were not normally distributed. The level of significance was determined as p<0.05 at a 95% Confidence Interval (CI).


Out of the 24 volunteers assessed for eligibility in the study, two samples were excluded due to having less than 10% neck disability. Finally, 22 volunteers who met the inclusion criteria participated in the study, with 11 subjects in each group (Table/Fig 2). The participants had a moderate disability score, calculated as 30.18% on the Neck Disability Index. The demographic characteristics of the participants, including age, duration of pain, and smartphone addiction scale scores, were approximately similar (Table/Fig 3).

Within each group, the post-values showed statistically significant improvements. Neck pain, as reported by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), improved in the experimental group from 5.8 to 2.5, and in the control group from 5.1 to 3.4, with a p-value less than 0.0001 in both groups. Similar results were seen for neck disability, as reported using the NDI scale. In the experimental group, NDI showed a change from a mean of 16.54 to 8.72, while in the control group, the mean change was from 13.6 to 10.72, with a p-value less than 0.05 in both groups. An improvement in FHP was observed in both groups, as the CVA reported using the MB ruler increased (Table/Fig 4).

Between the groups, the experimental group showed statistically more significant results, with a p-value less than 0.05. There was an improvement in neck pain, as reported by the NPRS, with a change in mean score to 3.27 in the experimental group and 1.72 in the control group, with a median difference of 2 for Group A and B at a 95% confidence interval of 3 to 1. Neck disability, reported using the NDI, showed greater improvement in the experimental group (7.81) compared to the control group (2.90), with a median difference value of 4 at a 95% confidence interval of 6 to 3. An increase in CVA, signifying improvement in FHP, showed a greater mean difference in the experimental group (8.58) than the control group (1.51), with a median difference of 7.13 at a 95% confidence interval of 9.10 to 5.13 (Table/Fig 5).


The IASTM works by applying pressure to release tightened connective tissue structures and treat soft tissue dysfunctions. Previous studies have reported that IASTM can improve cervical joint position error in chronic neck pain (24). In the present study, which was conducted on patients with text neck syndrome and a score of more than 34 on the smartphone addiction scale (short version), it was found that the additional use of IASTM along with conventional physical therapy resulted in a decrease in neck pain, improvement in disability, and FHP. FHP was reduced as a result of strengthening exercises, which also led to an increase in CVA, suggesting posture correction, and a reduction in the NDI.

In text neck syndrome, additional stress is placed on the postural muscles of the entire spine, particularly the cervical spine. The position of the skull anterior to the body’s centre of gravity contributes to chronic neck pain (3). Stretching and strengthening exercises are considered the most effective way to treat neck pain. Deep neck flexors are crucial for stabilising the correct alignment of the cervical spine, so most treatment regimens focus on strengthening these muscles. Previous studies on text neck suggest that to improve postural alignment and treat the condition, weak muscles should be strengthened, and shortened muscles should be stretched. Exercises like the chin tuck-in exercise work on the deep cervical flexors, while head bending exercises improve the endurance of the cervical flexor muscles (24),(25),(26). In the present study, specific muscle stretching and neck isometrics resulted in a decrease in neck pain, as measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), in patients with text neck syndrome. Pain was reduced in both groups, with a greater mean pain reduction in the experimental group (3.27) compared to the control group (1.72). A recent study in 2022 found a decrease in chronic neck pain following IASTM applied to the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles (24). IASTM has also been reported to be beneficial in reducing pain and improving function for upper trapezius trigger points (21).

Adding IASTM can facilitate and improve blood perfusion. The generation of heat beneath the instrument decreases tissue viscosity, resulting in a softening effect. IASTM also promotes angiogenesis and speeds up the healing process, leading to reduced pain (10). Motimath et al., found that the IASTM technique with the M2T blade was effective in reducing pain in individuals with upper trapezius spasm (27). Another study on chronic low back pain found a significant reduction in pain using the Graston technique (28).

The significant reduction in disability observed in patients can be attributed to the biomechanical correction of FHP. IASTM can break adhesions and cross-linkages, leading to improved muscle flexibility. Treatment of trigger areas in the upper trapezius using IASTM tools has shown a significant reduction in pain and disability, as measured by the NPRS and Neck Disability Index (NDI) (13). This improvement in disability level has a positive impact on performance during daily activities. Additionally, a reduction in pain can lead to an improvement in muscle activity levels (22). In the present study, the experimental group showed a mean reduction in disability of 7.81 compared to 2.90 in the control group. These findings align with a study that reported a decrease in pain and disability using IASTM in combination with stretching exercises for the management of upper cross syndrome compared to routine physical therapy (12). Another study demonstrated the positive effect of the M2T blade IASTM in reducing pain in trapezitis (27). Similar results, with reductions in pain and disability, were also reported in a 2020 study on chronic neck pain (22).

The authors also found a statistically significant improvement in the CVA in both groups. Specifically, following two weeks of treatment, the CVA increased by 8.56 degrees in the IASTM group compared to only conventional treatment. In the control group, the increase in CVA was 1.51 degrees, which was also statistically significant. The use of IASTM leads to localised haemorrhage by micro-traumatising soft tissues. This, in turn, increases the number of fibroblasts and releases nutrients, ultimately resulting in the production and maturation of collagen protein. Additionally, the decreased myofascial stiffness allows for better sliding of the fascia, aiding in improved postural adjustments (19). Mylonas et al., found that combining IASTM with neuromuscular exercises improves forward head posture and functionality in individuals with mechanical neck pain (10).

Stretching and strengthening exercises in text neck syndrome significantly reduce the NPRS, NDI, and increase the CVA. The addition of IASTM to the conventional protocol in text neck syndrome can help decrease pain, disability, and improve forward head posture. This can prevent the chronicity of the condition.


The study had its limitations. It was limited to a young adult population, so the findings may not be applicable to other age groups. Range of Motion (ROM) in the cervical region was not considered in the present study, which could have provided additional insights into the effectiveness of the interventions. Additionally, the study protocol only lasted for two weeks, and no further follow-up was conducted to assess the long-term effects of the interventions. Future studies should include longer-term follow-up periods and consider assessing additional outcome measures, particularly neck ROM, to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the interventions.


The study concluded that both conventional physical therapy and IASTM were individually effective in improving pain, disability, and FHP in text neck syndrome. However, the addition of IASTM to routine physical therapy resulted in statistically more significant results compared to routine physical therapy alone in reducing the NPRS, NDI, and CVA.


The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune for funding the materials and equipment required for this study. They are also grateful to all the participants for their cooperation throughout the entire process. Additionally, they would like to acknowledge the support of their colleagues for their valuable assistance.


Kumari S, Kumar R, Sharma D. Text neck syndrome: The pain of modern era. Int J Health Sci. 2021;11(11):161-65. [crossref]
Neupane S, Ali UI, Mathew A. Text neck syndrome-systematic review. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. 2017;3(7):141-48.
Worlikar AN, Shah MR. Incidence of forward head posture and associated problems in desktop users. Int J Health Sci Res. 2019;9(2):96-100.
Kothare H, Patil C, Muley R. Immediate effects of kinesio taping on upper trapezius muscle on subjects having text neck. International Journal of Physiology. 2019;4(2):131-33.
Kim HJ, Kim JS. The relationship between smartphone use and subjective musculoskeletal symptoms and university students. Journal of physical therapy science. 2015;27(3):575-79. [crossref][PubMed]
Hansraj KK. Assessment of stresses in the cervical spine caused by posture and position of the head. Surgical Technology International. 2014;25:277-79. 825
Keskula DR. Kinesiology: The mechanics and pathomechanics of human movement. Physical Therapy. 2004;84(3):291, 499.
Samani PP, Athavale NA, Shyam A, Sancheti PK. Awareness of text neck syndrome in young-adult population. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(8):01-05. [crossref]
Wong JJ, Shearer HM, Mior S, Jacobs C, Cote P, Randhawa K, et al. Are manual therapies, passive physical modalities, or acupuncture effective for the management of patients with whiplash-associated disorders or neck pain and associated disorders? An update of the Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders by the OPTIMa collaboration. Spine J. 2016;16(12):1598-630. [crossref][PubMed]
Mylonas K, Angelopoulos P, Billis E, Tsepis E, Fousekis K. Combining targeted IASTM applications and neuromuscular exercises can correct forward head posture and improve functionality of patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;22(1):212. [crossref][PubMed]
Cheatham SW, Lee M, Cain M, Baker R. The efficacy of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization: A systematic review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2016;60(3):200-11. PMID: 27713575; PMCID: PMC5039777.
Mahmood T, Afzal MW, Waseem I, Arif MA, Mahmood W. Comparative effectiveness of routine physical therapy with and without instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization for improving pain and disability in patients with neck pain due to upper crossed syndrome. Annals of Punjab Medical College (APMC). 2022;16(1):45-50.
Emshi Z A, Okhovatian F, Kojidi MM, Baghban AA, Azimi H. Comparison of the effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization and dry needling on active myofascial trigger points of upper trapezius muscle. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2021;35(59):01-09.
Young JG, Trudeau M, Odell D, Marinelli K, Dennerlein JT. Touch-screen tablet user configurations and case supported tilt affect head and neck flexion angles. Work. 2012;41(1):81-91. [crossref][PubMed]
Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: A study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:409-15. [crossref]
Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, et al. Measurement properties of the neck disability index a sustematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39(5):400-17. [crossref][PubMed]
Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smart phone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one. 2013;8(12):e83558. [crossref][PubMed]
Kisner C, Colby LA, Borstad J. Therapeutic exercise: Foundations and techniques. Fa Davis; 2017 Oct 18. 5th edition pg. 455.
Kim J, Sung DJ, Lee J. Therapeutic effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for soft tissue injury: Mechanisms and practical application. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017;13(1):12-22. [crossref][PubMed]
Kumar VVN, Saini S, Palekar TJ, Chandra N. Effect of sub occipital release, myofascial release with iastm tool on cervicogenic headache. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy. 2020;14(4):204-10.
El-Hafez HM, Hamdy HA, Takla MK, Ahmed SE, Genedy AF, Al Shaymaa S. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilisation versus stripping massage for upper trapezius myofascial trigger points. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020;15(2):87-93. [crossref][PubMed]
Paranjape S, Lad R. Comparison of manual versus instrument assisted soft tissue mobilisation of levator scapulae in chronic neck pain. Int J Res Review. 2020;7(3):364-69.
Hazar Z, Karabicak G, Tiftikci U. Reliability of photographic posture analysis of adolescents. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(10):3123-26. [crossref][PubMed]
Gercek H, Unuvar BS, Umit Yemisci O, Aytar A. Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization technique on pain and joint position error in individuals with chronic neck pain: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Somatosensory & Motor Research. 2023;40(1):25-32. [crossref][PubMed]
Naik, Varun, Shaikh R, Koyande S. Immediate effects of M2T blade on pain and range of motion inrecreational badminton shoulder pain subjects: A pilot study. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research. 2016;04(10):12965-129658. [crossref]
Tan CS, Hawthorne WR, McCune JE, Wang C. Theory of blade design for large deflections: Part ii-annular cascades. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 1984;106(2):354-65.[crossref]
Motimath B, Ahammed N, Chivate D. Immediate effect of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) with M2T blade technique in trapezitis: An experimental study. IJAR. 2017;3(5):527-29.
Lee JH, Lee DK, Oh JS. The effect of Graston technique on the pain and range of motion in patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(6):1852-55.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63539.18677

Date of Submission: Feb 16, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 30, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Sep 13, 2023
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2023

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 28, 2023
• Manual Googling: Apr 20, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Sep 11, 2023 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin


JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)