Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 34975

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : January | Volume : 17 | Issue : 1 | Page : BC01 - BC05 Full Version

Association of Serum Calcium and Serum Uric Acid Level with Inflammatory Markers to Predict the Outcome of COVID-19 Infection: A Retrospective Study

Published: January 1, 2023 | DOI:
BN Kruthi, N Asha Rani, D Namitha

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. D Namitha,
Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, Karnataka, India.


Introduction: Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an acute respiratory disease and the severity of COVID-19 is highly variable, ranging from asymptomatic infection to life-threatening disease. Therefore, biomarkers are required to assess the prognosis of the disease at the earliest.

Aim: To determine the correlation of serum calcium and serum uric acid levels with inflammatory markers of COVID-19 infection and also to assess serum calcium and serum uric acid levels in predicting the outcome of COVID-19 infection.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G Nagara, Karnataka, India from 1st April 2021 to 30th June 2021. Out of 483 COVID-19 infected patients admitted during the study period, data of 136 patients, investigated for serum calcium and serum uric acid levels were collected from medical records. Patients were categorised into survived and non survived group based on the outcome. Descriptive statistics, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, Student’s t-test were applied. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used in predicting the outcome of COVID-19 infection.

Results: Of the 136 COVID-19 positive patients, 87 were male and 49 were female patients. Mean age of non survived was significantly higher (59.19±12.6 years) as compared to survived patients (44.44±13.35 years). Further, Random Blood Sugar (RBS), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) and D-dimer values were significantly higher among non survived patients (233±135.37 mg/dL, 9.92±3.93 mg/L, 422.88±191.51 IU/L and 586.19±258.9 ng/mL, respectively) as compared to survived patients. Significant positive correlation was found between serum uric acid levels with LDH (r-value=0.231; p-value=0.007). Whereas, serum calcium showed negative correlation with CRP (r-value=-0.55; p-value=0.526) and D-dimer (r-value=-0.052; p-value=0.551). The ROC curve analysis showed that area under curve for serum uric acid level (0.530) was more as compared to serum calcium (0.460).

Conclusion: Serum uric acid is emerged as a better biomarker towards the prediction of outcome of patients. Early evaluation of serum calcium levels and serum uric acids could aid in predicting the outcome of the disease.


Biomarkers, Coronavirus disease 2019, Receiver operating characteristic, Severity

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) predominantly affects respiratory system and may manifest from asymptomatic to mild symptoms or severe respiratory disease (1). In early December 2019, the first case of pneumonia of unknown origin was identified in Wuhan, the capital city of Hubei province (2). From then COVID-19 quickly spread throughout the world and World Health Organisation (WHO) has declared it as a pandemic (3). In India, from 3rd January 2020 to 7th June 2021, there have been 28,909,975 confirmed cases of COVID-19 with 349,186 deaths reported (4).

During the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic many studies were undertaken to investigate the clinical and laboratory characteristics (5),(6),(7). The commonly investigated parameters were routine biochemical and pathological investigation, inflammatory markers, organ injury biomarkers and CT scan of thorax (1),(8). However, very few studies are conducted on serum calcium levels in COVID-19 infection (9),(10).

Many theories have been put across to explain the clinical manifestations and severity of COVID-19 infection. However, the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is not clear and also there is currently no effective antiviral treatment (11). During the second wave, the altered serum calcium level and serum uric acid levels in severely infected hospitalised COVID-19 patients were observed by the researchers (9),(11).

Several potential factors play an important role in causing hypocalcaemia in COVID-19. One could be a direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 viral E gene entry into host cells (12),(13),(14). SARS-CoV-2 viral E gene encodes a small transmembrane protein that functions as a calcium ion channel and causes alteration in calcium homeostasis within the host cell leading to the activation of inflammatory pathways resulting in lung cell damage. As a whole formation of virus structure, its entry into host cell, replication and their virion release, requires calcium (15). Serum uric acid is a strong reactive oxygen species and being an antioxidant plays important role in defence mechanism (16),(17). Schuler CF et al., showed that when the virus enters the body it invades the respiratory system and causes inflammation that results in increase in serum uric acid level (18).

Kelly A and Levine MA reported that acutely ill patients had decreased levels of serum calcium which is associated with a poor prognosis (10). A retrospective analysis by Zheng T et al., reported that the serum uric acid level was positively associated with inflammatory markers (19). In contrary, Hu F et al., in their study on association of serum uric acid levels with COVID-19 severity reported that serum uric acid and serum uric acid/creatinine levels at admission were lower in patients with severe COVID- 19 as compared to moderately infected patients (11).

The relation between serum uric acid levels with severity of COVID-19 infection is inconsistent. Further no studies have compared the serum calcium and serum uric acid level with outcome of COVID-19 infection. Early initiation of therapy according to alterations in serum calcium level and serum uric acid level may decrease the mortality of COVID-19 infection. Hence, the aim of the present study was to check the correlation between serum calcium and serum uric acid level with inflammatory makers among COVID-19 patients and to assess serum calcium and serum uric acid levels in predicting the outcome of COVID-19 infections.

Material and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS), B.G Nagara, Karnataka, India. The data of COVID-19 patients admitted at AIMS from 1st April 2021 to 30th June 2021 was collected from medical records for a period of two months and was analysed between October 2021 to November 2021. Study was initiated after obtaining ethical clearance from Institutional Ethical Committee [No. AIMS/IEC/261/2021 Dated18/06/2021].

Inclusion criteria: COVID-19 patients, confirmed with Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) and/or Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), aged >18 years, who were investigated for calcium and serum uric acid level either on the day of admission or during their stay in the hospital were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who had history of parathyroid disease, bone disease, chronic liver disease, kidney dysfunction and malignant tumours were excluded from the study.

During the study period, 483 COVID-19 infected patients were admitted at AIMS, out of which, 136 COVID-19 patients, investigated for calcium and serum uric acid level were enrolled in the study by convenient sampling method.

Data Collection

The data required for the present study was obtained from the medical records. Data included baseline clinical characteristics like age, gender, co-morbid status, duration of hospital stay and investigations such as Random Blood Sugar (RBS), blood urea, serum creatinine, serum albumin, Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), serum calcium, serum uric acid, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) was analysed by various methods using Vitros-250 dry chemistry and D-dimer was analysed using XL 1000i operan, done on the day of admission and or during the stay were included. Above mentioned biochemical investigations were analysed for COVID-19 infected patients as these are inflammatory markers and are associated with severity and mortality of COVID-19 disease (5),(6),(7).

All the COVID-19 patients were categorised into survived and non survived group, based on their serum calcium levels patients were grouped into normal (8.5-11 mg/dL) or decreased (<8.5 mg/dL) and based on their serum uric acid level patients were divided into three groups normal (2.5-6 mg/dL), decreased (<2.4 mg/dL) or increased (>6 mg/dL) (Table/Fig 1) (20).

Statistical Analysis

The collected data was entered in Microsoft excel sheet and analysed using Epi data software. Descriptive statistics like frequency and proportion was calculated. Student’s t-test was used and p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare the parameters with different levels of serum uric acid. Pearson’s correlation was employed to examine the correlation between serum calcium level and serum uric acid level with outcome of COVID-19 admitted patients. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess serum calcium and serum uric acid in predicting the development of outcome of COVID-19 infection.


Among 136 COVID-19 positive patients, 87 (76 survived and 11 non survived) were male patients with mean age of 47.10±14.48 years and 49 (34 survived and 15 non survived) were female patients with mean age of 47.53±14.4 years and there was no significant difference between the gender with p-value of 0.86.

The mean age of non survived was significantly higher as compared to survived patients. Further, RBS (p-value=0.013), CRP (p-value=0.023), LDH (p-value=0.010) and D-Dimer (p-value=0.043) values were higher among non survived patients as compared to survived patients and it was found be significant. Whereas mean values of albumin (p-value=0.014) were higher among survived patients as compared to non survived with significant difference between them (Table/Fig 2).

As seen in (Table/Fig 3), out of 136 COVID-19 positive patients, 94 (69.12%) had normal serum calcium level with mean value of 9.30±0.56 mg/dL and 42 (30.88%) patients had decreased serum calcium level with mean value of 7.81±0.72 mg/dL and it was found to be statistically significant (p-value <0.0001).

D-dimer level was significantly higher among patients with decreased calcium level as compared to patients with normal calcium level. However, other parameters like RBS, urea, creatinine, AST, ALT, ALP, CRP and LDH values were higher among patients with decreased calcium level. Whereas, Albumin and serum uric acid level was lower among patients with decreased calcium level (Table/Fig 4).

Study subjects were compared based on serum uric acid level as shown in (Table/Fig 5) majority 110 (80.88%) patients had normal serum uric acid level. However, 11 (8.09%) had decreased and 15 (11.03%) had increased serum uric acid level.

The mean value of RBS was significantly higher among patients with increased serum uric acid. Further, mean value of urea and creatinine was higher among patients with increased uric acid as compared to patients with normal and decreased level of uric acid and it was found to be significant. Similarly, mean value of serum calcium and LDH was significantly higher among patients with increased uric acid (Table/Fig 6).

Among 110 survived COVID-19 patients majority 83 (75.45%) had normal serum calcium level. Similarly, 91 (82.73%) had normal serum uric acid level, as compared to 9 (8.18%) of decreased and 10 (9.09%) of increased serum uric acid level (Table/Fig 7).

Out of 26 non survived COVID-19 patients 15 (57.69%) had decreased serum calcium level. However majority of non survived patients had normal serum uric acid level, only 5 (19.23%) patients had increased uric acid and 2 (7.69%) patients were having low serum uric acid level (Table/Fig 8).

A significant positive correlation was found between serum uric acid levels with LDH (r-value=0.231; p-value=0.007). Whereas, Serum calcium showed negative correlation with CRP (r-value=-0.55; p-value=0.526) and D-dimer (r-value=-0.052; p-value=0.551) but it was not found statistically significant (Table/Fig 9).

The ROC analysis was done to predict the prognostic performance of serum calcium and uric acid to predict the development of poor outcome (Table/Fig 10). It found that, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for serum uric acid (0.530) was higher as compared to serum calcium (0.460). Therefore serum uric acid with higher AUC emerged as a better biomarker towards the prediction of poor outcome with COVID-19 infection.


In the present clinical retrospective study, the correlations between serum calcium and serum uric acid with outcome of COVID-19 infection was investigated. Out of 136 study participants, the incidence of hypocalcaemia was seen in 42 (30.88%) cases and hyperuricaemia was in 15 (11.03%) cases. Decreased serum calcium was observed significantly higher among non survived COVID-19 patients.

In the present study, it was observed that hyperglycaemia, hypoalbuminaemia and increased inflammatory mediator like CRP, LDH and D-dimer concentrations among non survival group COVID-19 as compared to survival of COVID-19 patients indicating higher inflammation and tissue damage among the former ones. These findings were in accordance with previously published article by Huang C et al., they reported that the median value of AST 44 U/L), ALT (49 U/L), LDH (400 U/L) and D-dimer (2.4 mg/L) were higher among patients admitted in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) as compared to non ICU patients (34 U/L, 27 U/L, 281 U/L and 0.5 mg/L, respectively) whereas median value of serum albumin level (2.79 g/L) was decreased among patients admitted in ICU (2). Elevated serum CRP and D-dimer signifies inflammatory response and coagulation disorder, further elevation of LDH detonates the tissue damage induced by COVID-19 infection (9),(19). Studies have shown significant association between hypocalcaemia and inflammatory markers that reflect severity of the disease. Present study showed a negative association of calcium levels with CRP levels and D-dimer. This is similar to the study done by Sun JK et al., (20).

In a study conducted by Liu J et al., they found that 62.6% had hypocalcaemia and patients with hypocalcaemia were presented with poor outcome (47.8% (32/67) vs 25% (10/40), p-value=0.02). In the present study it was found that among non survived COVID-19, 57.69% had decreased serum calcium level and 42.31% had normal serum calcium level (9).

Uric acid is the end product of purine metabolism and it is a potent antioxidant that alarms and initiates immune system in response to cell injury/death and thus clears the dead cells/tissues. During the process of tissue damage, intracellular uric acid is released resulting in hyperuricaemic state. A study by Schuler CF et al., showed that invasion of virus to the respiratory system could induce hyperuricsemia (18).

In the present study, it was observed elevated uric acid levels among non survived COVID-19 patients. Further, there were significant increased levels of blood sugar, urea, creatinine, calcium and LDH among the patients with hyperuricaemia. Similar to the study by Zeng T et al., a positive correlation was found between uric acid and inflammatory markers (CRP, LDH and D-dimer) in patients with COVID-19 (19).

In the present study it was found that majority of non survived (73.08%) had normal serum uric acid level however, 19.23% patients had increased uric acid as compared to 7.69% patients who had low serum uric acid level. Present study results are in concurrence with the study done by Zheng T et al., they concluded that there was a significant differences in the rates of hyperuricaemia (OR: 3.17, 95% CI: 2.13-4.70; p-value <0.001) between deceased and recovered patients (19).

In the present study, ROC analysis was done to predict the prognostic performance of serum calcium and uric acid to predict the development of poor outcome. It was found that AUC for serum uric acid level (0.530) was more compared to serum calcium (0.460). In the present study serum uric acid emerged as a better biomarker towards the prediction of prognosis of patients with COVID-19 infection. Thus, initiation of therapy based on the alterations in serum calcium and serum uric acid level will be beneficial in lessening the burden of mortality due COVID-19 infection and increases the survival rate.

The results of the present study provided the information regarding the effect of serum calcium and serum uric acid level on outcome of COVID -19 infections and survival rate. Hence, further studies are required to know the effect of calcium supplementation in treating hypocalcaemia and prognosis of COVID-19 infected patients and to know the specific relationship between admission serum uric acid lowering drug and its outcomes in hospitalised patients.


One of the potential limitations of the present study is small sample size. Secondly, referred cases with corrected/initiation of treatment for altered serum calcium and serum uric acid levels were not considered.


Present study has shown that serum calcium levels were lower and serum uric acid levels were elevated among non survived patients. Further, serum uric acid emerged as a better biomarker towards the prediction of prognosis of patients with COVID-19 infection. Findings of the present study can speculate that low calcium and elevated serum uric acid levels in COVID-19 patients could be due to viral associated cytokine and increased immune response to the damaged tissues, respectively. Therefore, early evaluation of serum calcium levels and serum uric acids could aid in predicting the outcome of the disease and helps to circumvent the damage of multiple organs.


Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497-06. [crossref] [PubMed]
WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID19-March 2020.
Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J Virol. 2020.94:e00127-20. https://doi .org/10.1128/JVI.00127-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
Qin C, Zhou L, Hu Z, Zhang S, Yang S, Tao Y, et al. Dysregulation of Immune Response in Patients With Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 28;71(15):762-68. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa248. [crossref] [PubMed]
Ge H, Wang X, Yuan X, Xiao G, Wang C, Deng T, et al. The epidemiology and clinical information about COVID-19. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(6):1011-19. Doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03874-z. [crossref] [PubMed]
Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalised patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020;323(11):1061-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
Liu J, Han P, Wu J, Gong J, Tian D. Prevalence and predictive value of hypocalcemia in severe COVID-19 patients. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(9):1224-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
Kelly A, Levine MA. Hypocalcemia in the critically ill patient. J Intensive Care Med. 2013;28:166-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
Hu F, Guo Y, Lin J, Zeng Y, Wang J, Li M, et al. Association of serum uric acid levels with COVID-19 severity. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21(1):97. [crossref] [PubMed]
Millet JK, Whittaker GR. Physiological and molecular triggers for SARS-CoV membrane fusion and entry into host cells. Virology. 2018;517:03-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
Straus MR, Tang T, Lai AL, Flegel A, Bidon M, Freed JH, et al. Ca2+ Ions promote fusion of middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus with host cells and increase infectivity. J Virol. 2020;94(13):e00426-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
Di Filippo L, Doga M, Frara S, Giustina A. Hypocalcemia in COVID-19: Prevalence, clinical significance and therapeutic implications. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022;23(2):299-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
Nieto-Torres JL, DeDiego ML, Verdiá-Báguena C, Jimenez-Guardeño JM, Regla-Nava JA, Fernandez-Delgado R, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus envelope protein ion channel activity promotes virus fitness and pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(5):e1004077. [crossref] [PubMed]
Glantzounis GK, Tsimoyiannis EC, Kappas AM, Galaris DA. Uric acid and oxidative stress. Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11(32):4145-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
Sautin YY, Johnson RJ. Uric acid: The oxidant-antioxidant paradox. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucl Acids. 2008;27(6):608-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
Schuler CF, Malinczak CA, Best SKK, Morris SB, Rasky AJ, Ptaschinski C, et al. Inhibition of uric acid or IL-1β ameliorates respiratory syncytial virus immunopathology and development of asthma. Allergy. 2020;75(9):2279-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
Zheng T, Liu X, Wei Y, Li X, Zheng B, Gong Q, et al. Laboratory Predictors of COVID19 Mortality: A retrospective analysis from Tongji Hospital in Wuhan. Mediators Inflamm. 2021;2021:6687412. [crossref] [PubMed]
Sun JK, Zhang WH, Zou L, Liu Y, Li JJ, Kan XH, et al. Serum calcium as a biomarker of clinical severity and prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(12):11287-95. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58651.17209

Date of Submission: Jun 24, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 25, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Oct 14, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2023

• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 30, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 03, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 07, 2022 (14%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)