Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 149852

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : DC01 - DC05 Full Version

Antibacterial Activity of Ulva lactuca against Multidrug Resistant and Betalactamase Producing Isolates from Food Samples- An In-vitro Study


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61200.17467
M Manivannan, G Subramanian

1. Research Scholar, Department of Botany, Arignar Anna Government Arts College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Botany, Arignar Anna Government Arts College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. G Subramanian,
Assistant Professor, Department of Botany, Arignar Anna Government Arts College, Namakkal-637002, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: gsbotanygs@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Antibiotic resistance is a problem of deep scientific concern, both in hospital and community settings. Due the presence of highly resistant microorganisms in food, it may lead to serious health issues to the human beings and other animals also. This can be controlled by novel control methods using natural products. Algae are one such wonderful source that helps in treating such dreadful microorganisms. Ulva lactuca incorporate discrete active compounds, hence, exhibit antibacterial property to control the Multidrug Resistant (MDR) bacteria. The present research aims in exploring the potential antibacterial property of such dreadful bacteria.

Aim: To evaluate the potential bioactive compound of Ulva lactuca and its antibacterial activity against MDR and betalactamase producing food isolates.

Materials and Methods: The present pilot in-vitro study was carried out at Arignar Anna Government Arts College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India, in the period of December 2017 to December 2020. Total 18 bacterial isolates were isolated from five retail chicken meat samples. These were then, tested for its antibiotic resistance property using standard antibiotic discs. The algae Ulva lactuca was isolated and extract was prepared using ethanol and chloroform solvents, followed by which the phytochemical studies were performed. These extracts were then tested, against the selected organisms for its potential activity.

Results: Among the 12 antibiotics tested, all isolates were resistance to variety of antibiotic classes, mainly aminoglycosides, cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones and also 55% of the bacteria were able to produce betalactamase enzyme. The ethanol extract of Ulva lactuca was highly active against all isolates and exhibited a range of 10±1.24 mm to 22±1.24 mm inhibition zone. The chloroform extract, exhibited less potency, which exhibited 10±0.816 mm to 13.16±1.027 mm inhibition zone. Each organic solvent showed positive result for following metabolites- alkaloids, carbohydrates, flavonoids, sterols, tannins and terpenoids.

Conclusion: The ethanolic extract of Ulva lactuca was very effective against the selected MDR and betalactamase producing food isolates. Therefore, it could be suggested as an antibacterial agent in the future. Further studies are needed to reveal the behavioural mechanisms of this plant and its pharmacological effects.

Keywords

Antibiotics, Biofilm, Foodborne infections

Recently, there have been significant concerns for human health regarding the misuse and indiscriminate use of antibiotics in veterinary medicine. One of the major impacts of antibiotic residues in animal-derived foods is the spread of antibiotic resistant microorganisms. Antibiotic resistant pathogenic bacteria can cause foodborne illnesses in humans that are challenging to treat. They can distribute resistance genes to other microbes through the food chain (1).

Approximately, 1.8 million people die from foodborne illnesses in underdeveloped countries each year due to food borne pathogens. Among the food samples, meats are main reservoirs of foodborne pathogens such as Listeria monocytogenes, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Vibrio cholerae, and Staphylococcus aureus. This is caused by cross-contamination through poor personal hygiene and sharing dirty utensils (2).

A number of mechanisms are there through which bacteria can evolve antibiotic resistance. Among them Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) is important enzyme, which deactivate the beta-lactam antibiotics through hydrolysis of beta-lactam ring. Moreover bacterial biofilms are a significant global health issue that contribute to persistent chronic infections because of their resistance to antibiotics, host defence mechanisms and other external stressors (3).

In this situation, there is an urgent need to develop a new and natural antibiotic, as there is a growing concern about pathogens in the food that are resistant to many drugs. Micro and macroalgae, phytoplankton, cnidarians, molluscs, corals, sponges, bryozoans and tunicates are the most common marine organisms that are focused for screening to identify their antimicrobial potential, especially to identify the compounds, that target pathogenic bacteria (4).

Ulva lactuca (U. lactuca) also known as green algae (sea lettuce), is classified as macroalgae in the phylum Chlorophyta (5). The U. lactuca contains number of secondary metabolites, which showed the antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anticoagulant activities (6),(7),(8),(9). The presence of these secondary metabolites was determined to be the reason for the antimicrobial activity of U. lactuca against Multidrug Resistant (MDR) of bacterial isolates. However, information on the potential of U. lactuca as an antibacterial agent ESBL and biofilm producing isolates is still limited. The present study was undertaken to study the preliminary phytochemicals analysis and antibacterial activity of U. lactuca against multidrug resistance and biofilm producing food pathogens.

Material and Methods

This was a pilot in-vitro study, conducted at Arignar Anna Government Arts College, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, india, in the period of December 2017 to December 2020. For the present study, all chemicals and culture media were purchased from Himedia, India. Total 18 bacterial isolates were isolated from five retail chicken meat samples. These were then, tested for its antibiotic resistance property using standard antibiotic discs.

Study Procedure

Isolation and identification of bacterial isolates: A total of five samples of chicken meat were obtained from retail shops in and around Namakkal area. The samples were wrapped aseptically and shifted to the laboratory promptly and samples were reviewed and studied within 24 hours. All samples were crushed with phosphate buffer with the help of mortar and pestle. A loopful of crushed samples was inoculated into sterilised selective media agar plates. Perfectly label the inoculated plates and incubate the same at 37°C for 24 hours. Upon incubation, the colonies were identified based on the colony morphology in the selective media and subjected for further studies.

Antibacterial susceptibility testing: Antibacterial susceptibility test was accomplished by Kirby-bauer method using sterile Muller Hinton agar plates in conferment with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly NCCLS) briefing (10),(11),(12). A sequence of 12 antibiotics was used to test the competency of the bacterial isolates.

Biofilm assay: Biofilm assay was carried out by Freeman et al., 1989 procedure (12). The isolates were inoculated by single streak method on sterile brain heart infusion agar media with supplemented with sucrose (5%) and congo red (0.08 g/L). All plates were incubated at 37oC for 24 hours. The formation of black colour indicates the positive result.

Collection of algal samples: The algal samples of Ulva lactuca were acquired from Rameshwaram seashore during winter season from the month of December to March (2018-2019) from a profound length of about 50 m of the sea surface water in rocky area. The samples were then, transferred to the laboratory in aseptic manner in sterilised plastic bags with sea water to hinder evaporation of the collected samples. The epiphytes and rock debris from the algal samples were cleaned with utmost care, followed by which it was rinsed gently with fresh water for the surface salt removal. A small quantity of seaweed sample collected was saved for its identification. Upon cleaning, it was dried and shade dried for about two to three days (48-72 hours) (13).

Identification of algae: The algae were identified based on their taxonomical characteristics which were published by Jha B et al., (14). The identification procedures were carried out at CSMCRI Marine Algal Research Station, Maandapam, Rameshwaram, India.

Preparation of algal extracts: The algal biomass which was dried and powdered was extracted using different solvents (ethanol, chloroform and ethyl acetate). The biomass was soaked in respective solvents mentioned above (10 gm: 150 gm) and retained in a rotary shaker at 150 rpm at room temperature for 72 hours. After the specified time, the extracts were filtered separately using Whatman No.1 filter paper. The filtrates were dried by evaporation under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator. The crude extracts were then dissolved in respective solvent to a final concentration of 100 mg/mL as stalk solution. It was stored at -20°C for further procedures (15).

Preliminary phytochemicals analysis: The preliminary phytochemical studies for the algal extracts were accomplished by Solomon CU et al., procedure (16). The phytochemicals like alkaloids, carbohydrates, flavanoids, phenols, saponins, tannins, terpinoids, quinines, glycosides, proteins and steroids were analysed.

Determination of antimicrobial activity: The antibacterial activity was determined by well diffusion method followed by Abdel-Khaliq A et al., (17). Fresh bacterial cultures from 24 hour old broth were spread on sterile Muller Hinton agar plates. Metallic bores were used for making wells and the algal extracts were dispersed in the wells at different concentrations and labelled properly. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours and upon incubation, observed for the zone formation. The zones were measured and recorded.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used and the data was presented in the form of percentages and mean and Standard Deviation (SD).

Results

A total of seven genera of 18 bacterial isolates were isolated from five retail chicken meat samples. Among these populations isolated, 72.2% were identified as gram negative and 27.7% were found to be gram positive organisms. The predominant bacterial pathogen isolated was E. faecalis and E. coli (22.2%), followed by Salmonella spp. (16.6%) and lowest prevalence in S. aureus (5.5%).

In the present study, the authors monitor some antibiotics and their effect on three major bacterial isolates. Among the seven bacterial genera, single isolate of S. aureus (66.6%) was showed highest antibiotic resistance followed by P. aeruginosa (62.4%). In present study, 12 antibiotic tested, all isolates were resistance to atleast three drugs from a variety of antibiotic classes, mainly aminoglycosides, cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones (Table/Fig 1).

Moreover, significant MDR patterns was observed in Salmonella spp. Among the antibiotic tested, erythromycin, tetracycline, nalidixic acid and cephalosporins antibiotics were resistance to most of the Salmonella isolates (Table/Fig 2).

In this investigation, next part of the study was determination preliminary phytochemicals on both solvent extract. Among the tested phytochemicals, alkaloids, carbohydrates, and protein were positive in both solvent extracts, flavonoids and quinones were showed in ethanol extract only. Sterols and terpenoids were present in chloroform extract only. The phenols and saponins were not observed in both extracts (Table/Fig 3).

The (Table/Fig 4) revealed that antibacterial activity of ethanol solvent extract of Ulva lactuca, among the seven genera, E. faecalis was highly suppressed, which exhibiting the zone of inhibition was ranged from 10±1.24 mm to 22±1.24 mm, and followed by Proteus spp. Presently, all isolates were suppressed while using 7.5 mg of extract and 2.5 mg of extract was suppressed only two isolates (Table/Fig 5). Unlike the high potency of the ethanol extract, the chloroform extract exhibited less potency against these bacteria, which exhibiting zone of inhibition was ranged from 10±0.816 mm to 13.16±1.027 mm (Table/Fig 6). The negative controls (ethanol and chloroform) did not produce any zone of inhibition for all the bacterial strains tested, but positive control of ampicillin (10 μg/disc) produced mean zone of inhibition ranged from 11±0.81 to 15±0.81 mm (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

All isolates were confirmed with morphological and cultural characterisation with chromogenic media and selective media. This result revealed that such contamination occurred during the butchering of the animals and the processing of the meat. In fact, slaughtering chickens with Salmonella infections can contaminate the slaughter line, a significant source of cross-contamination (18). The detection of Salmonella spp., in the present study is considered important, because Salmonella spp. the most important food borne pathogens worldwide. MRSA has been identified as a significant nosocomial pathogen and has been linked to food borne diseases (19). Recently Likhitha P et al., observed the 7.6% of MRSA from food samples (20). The present study is quite contrasting to that of the above study, where the percentage of S. aureus isolates was only 5.5%.

A major problem in poultry production worldwide today is infection by MDR bacteria. Poultry veterinarians are concerned because providing antibiotics to chickens at therapeutic and sub-therapeutic doses has always been an integral part of poultry production. Shrestha A et al., and Tawakol M et al., have observed the MDR of P. aeruginosa from poultry meat samples (21),(22). The similar line with the result was observed from Badr JM et al., study, they were observed the 100% of cephalosporins and 62.5% of aminoglycosides group of antibiotic resistance against to P. aeruginosa (23).

Moreover, significant MDR patterns was observed in Salmonella spp. This result was agreement with previous study of Hamed EA et al., they were also observed the similar line of the antibiotic resistance patterns (24). Many of these antibiotics employed in poultry production, also serve as essential medicines for use in humans in many countries.

This resistance not only develops when given to growing poultry and also unhygienic slaughter practices are responsible for contamination of MDR isolates on meat samples. In the present study, 55.5% of the isolates were resistance to betalactam antibiotic of penicillin. As proof of this statement, 55% of the bacteria in the present study produced the betalactamase enzyme; among the seven genera Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were highly produced. Moreover, the betalactamase producing isolates were resistance to other than betalactam antibiotics. This phenomenon was similar to previous study of Mukherjee M et al., reports (25).

Batabyal K et al., also observed the highest percentage of betalactam antibiotic resistance isolates from poultry meat samples in India (26). The reason could be that those antibiotics are the most commonly prescribed treatment for bacterial infection and are the leading cause of antibiotic resistance in gram negative bacteria (27). Furthermore, 72.2% of biofilm producing isolates were observed and unsurprising information is that, most of the bacteria produce the betalactamase enzyme and have high antibiotic resistance.

These isolates were limiting uptake of a drug, modification of a drug target and inactivation of a drug, therefore, not easily eradicate (3).

As an issue of deep scientific concern, the treatment of these drug resistance organisms is difficult to resolve, since, the prevalence of ESBL producing organisms is difficult to resolve for various reasons, including the difficulty of detecting ESBL production and inconsistency in reporting (28). In this context, understanding ESBL formation and the antibacterial spectrum of bacterial isolates is important for providing reliable empirical antibiotic therapy to patients. Researchers are currently conducting extensive research on alternative therapy solutions, including most marine organisms. Among them seaweed or macroalgae provide a great variety of metabolites and natural bioactive compounds, with antimicrobial activity.

Number of studies has shown marine algae to possess antimicrobial, anti-allergic, and anticancer properties (29). Green alga, Ulva spp., is documented to have antimicrobial activity against major pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus and even MRSA (6),(30). Number of phytochemicals was responsible for the beneficial activity. Ulva lactuca is of the family Chlorophyta (green algae), which has plethora of secondary active metabolites (30). In the present study, alkaloids, carbohydrates, and protein were positive in both solvent extract and flavonoids, tannins and quinones were showed in ethanol extract only. Anjali KP et al., also observed the various phytochemicals from solvent extract of Ulva lactuca (31).

The previous studies was performed outstanding antimicrobial activity of ethanol extract of Ulva spp., against several bacteria including P. aeruginasa, E. coli, K. pneumonia and S. aureus (32),(33). In 2017, El-shouny WA et al., determined the antibacterial activity of Ulva spp. against MDR isolates (34). However, the antibacterial effect of Ulva lactuca against ESBL producing bacteria has not been studied so far. In the present study, it is clear that the antibacterial activity was without any difference between gram negative and gram positive isolates. It was also observed that, ethanol extract showed highest inhibitory activity because of its high polarity and it allows extracting all the phytochemicals.

Furthermore, phytochemicals analysis was observed from both extracts, those metabolites are responsible for beneficial activity. The flavonoids and tannins positive result in the ethanol extract and which were used therapeutically as antiviral, antibacterial, antiulcer and antioxidant agents. Many drugs containing tannin are well-known to possess general antimicrobial properties reported (35). Based on the results of the present study, the phytochemicals extracted from green algae Ulva lactuca have shown a relatively strong antibacterial activity on bacteria and it could be considered as, a source of novel antibiotic.

Limitation(s)

The minimum inhibitory concentrations were not performed, the present study can only be considered preliminary and further studies are needed to explore the possibility of using it, as an antibacterial agent, against food pathogens and food preservative.

Conclusion

The findings of the present investigation demonstrated that Ulva lactuca extracts in ethanol and chloroform had positive antibacterial effects on isolates of MDR bacteria, biofilm and ESBLs. The highest antibacterial activity was observed with the ethanolic extract, and further characterisation of the phytochemicals revealed the presence of beneficial compounds that, may account for the observed antibacterial activity. From this, it can be concluded that, the highly polar compounds present in the Ulva lactuca extract may be responsible for the significant antibacterial activity. Therefore, further studies are needed to evaluate the antibacterial activity of different extracts and to determine the chemical structure of the active ingredients.

References

1.
Manyi-Loh C, Mamphweli S, Meyer E, Okoh A. Antibiotic use in agriculture and its consequential resistance in environmental sources: Potential public health implications. Molecules. 2018;23(4):795. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Ali MM, Subhan SA. Molecular characterisation of antibiotic resistance pattern among gram negative bacteria isolated from red meat in Karachi. J Bacteriol Mycol. 2016;2(5):127-38. [crossref]
3.
Sharma D, Misba L, Khan AU. Antibiotics versus biofilm: An emerging battleground in microbial communities. Anti-microbial Resistance & Infection Control. 2019;8:76. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Hu Y, Chen J, Hu G, Yu J, Zhu X, Lin Y, et al. Statistical research on the bioactivity of new marine natural products discovered during the 28 years from 1985 to 2012. Mar Drug. 2015;13:202-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Dominguez H, Loret EP. Ulva lactuca, a source of troubles and potential riches. Mar Drugs. 2019;17(6):357. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Mo’o FRC, Wilar G, Devkota HP, Ulvan WN. A polysaccharide from Macroalga Ulvasp. A review of chemistry, biological activities and potential for food and biomedical applications. Appl Sci. 2020;10(16):5488. [crossref]
7.
Kolanjinathan K, Stella D. Comparative studies on anti-microbial activity of ulva reticulata and ulva lactuca against human pathogens. International Journal of Pharmatheutical and Biological Archives. 2011;2:1738-44.
8.
Tan L, O’Sullivan, Prieto ML, Gardiner GE, Lawlor PG, Leonard F, et al. Extraction and bioautographic-guided separation of anti-bacterial compounds from Ulva lactuca. J Appl Phycol. 2012;24(3):513-23. [crossref]
9.
Okechukwu A. Inhibition of pathogenic microorganism by ethnobotanical extracts. Department of Biotechnology Federal University of Technology, Owerr. 2012.
10.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). 2018. Performance standards for anti-microbial disk susceptibility tests, 13th ed CLSI standard M02 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
11.
NCCLS. Performance standards for anti-microbial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals, approved standard. 2nd Edition, NCCLS Document M31-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne. 2002;22(6).
12.
Freeman FR, Falkiner CT, Keane. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J Clin Pathol. 1989;42:872-74. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Patel GG, Patel V, Thakur MC. Study of microbial diversity in Ulva lactuca from North West coast of Gujarat, India. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2018;9(3):1201-12.
14.
Jha B, Reddy CRK, Thakur MC, Rao MU. Seaweeds of India: The Diversity and Distribution of Seaweeds of the Gujarat Coast. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer; 2009. [crossref]
15.
Sheikh H, El-Naggar A, Al-Sobahi D. Evaluation of antimycotic activity of extracts of marine algae collected from red sea coast, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines. 2018;6(4):51-68. [crossref]
16.
Solomon CU, Arukwe UI, Ifeanyi O. Preliminary phytochemical screening of different solvent extracts of stem bark and roots of Dennetia tripetala. As J Pl Sci Res. 2013;3(3):10-13.
17.
Abdel-Khaliq A, Hassan HM, Rateb M, Hammouda O. Anti-microbial activity of three ulva species collected from some Egyptian Mediterranean seashores. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science. 2014;2(5):648-69.
18.
Rasschaert G, Houf K, De Zutter L. Impact of the slaughter line contamination on the presence of Salmonella on broiler carcasses. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;103(2):333-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Fetsch A, Kraushaar B, Krause G, Guerra-Roman B, Alt K, Hammer JA. Methicillin susceptible and resistant Staphylococcus aureus from farm to fork impact on food safety. Scientific Journal Meat Technology. 2011;52(1):60-65.
20.
Likhitha P, Nayak JB, Thakur S. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in retail buffalo meat in Anand, India. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2022;11(6):17-20.
21.
Shrestha A, Bajracharya AM, Subedi H, Turha RS, Kafle S, Sharma S, et al. Multidrug resistance and extended spectrum beta lactamase producing Gram negative bacteria from chicken meat in Bharatpur Metropolitan, Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:574. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Tawakol M, Nabil N, Reda R. Molecular studies on some virulence factors of pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from chickens as a biofilm forming bacteria. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal. 2018;64(159):43-51. [crossref]
23.
Badr JM, El Saidy FR, Abdelfattah AA. Emergence of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in broiler chicks. International Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2020;5(2):41-47. [crossref]
24.
Hamed EA, Abdelaty MF, Sorour HK, Roshdy H, AbdelRahman MAA, Magdy O, et al. Monitoring of anti-microbial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from poultry farms from 2014 to 2018. Veterinary Medicine International. 2021;2021:6739220. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Mukherjee M, Basu S, Mukherjee SK, Majumder M. Multidrug-resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamase production in uropathogenic E. Coli which were isolated from hospitalized patients in Kolkata, India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(3):449-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Batabyal K, Banerjee A, Dey S, Samanta I, Isore DP, Singh AD. Detection and characterisation of multidrug-resistant extended-spectrum and pAmpC Beta-lactamases producing Escherichia coli from chicken meat in West Bengal, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2020;9(7):80-89. [crossref]
27.
Shaikh S, Fatima J, Shakil S, Rizvi SM, Kamal MA. Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamases: Types, epidemiology and treatment. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2015;22(1):90-101.[crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Bakshi R, Walia G, Jain S. Prevalence of extended spectrum ß-lactamases in multidrug resistant strains of gram negative Bacilli. J Acad Indus Res. 2013;1(9):558-60.
29.
Kavitha, Rynghang JS, Peter JD. Anti-microbial activity of sea weed- Ulva lactuca against common bacterial pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Indian Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2017;20(1):42-46. [crossref]
30.
Murugaboopathy V, Kumar SR, Ravirajan M, Suganya M, Kalavathy G, Muthaszeer M. Anti-microbial activity of Ulva lactuca, green algae, against common oral pathogens. J Basic Clin Appl Health Sci. 2020;3(4):168-70. [crossref]
31.
Anjali KP, Sangeetha BM, Devi G, Raghunathan R, Susmita D. Bio prospecting of seaweeds (Ulva lactuca and Stoechospermum marginatum): The compound characterisation and functional applications in medicine-a comparative study. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2019;200:111622. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Minhas FT, Arslan G, Gubbuk IH, Akkoz C, Ozturk BY, Asikkutlu B, et al. Evaluation of anti-bacterial properties on polysulfone composite membranes using synthesized biogenic silver nanoparticles eith Ulva compresa (L.) Kruz. and Cladophora glomerata (L.) Kruz. extracts. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;107(Pt A):157-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Wulanjati MP, Apriyana W, Darsih C, Indrianingsih AW. Anti-oxidant and anti- bacterial activity of ethanolic extract from Ulva sp. Conf. Series. Earth and Environmental Science. 2020;462:012028. [crossref]
34.
El-shouny WA, Gaafar RM, Ismail GA, Elzanaty MM. Seasonal variation of the anti-bacterial activity of some seaweeds against Multidrug resistant pathogenic bacterial strains. Egypt J Exp Biol. (Bot.). 2017;13(2):341-51. [crossref]
35.
Chandrasekaran M, Venkatesalu V, Raj GA, Krishnamoorthy S. Anti-bacterial activity of Ulva fasciata against multidrug resistant bacterial strains. International Letters of Natural Sciences. 2014;19:40-51.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61200.17467

Date of Submission: Nov 02, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 03, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 08, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 28, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 07, 2023 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com