Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 145375

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : EC22 - EC25 Full Version

Mucinous Carcinoma of Breast: A Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Study


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59891.17523
Prem Ravindrakumar Kalagi, Rajesh H Chandan, Mohammed Abdus Samee, Purushotham Reddy

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor, Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Prem Ravindrakumar Kalagi,
Sonasagar, 80/81, Chethana Colony, Near Girish English Medium School, Vidyanagar, Hubballi, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: kalagiprem@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Mucinous Carcinoma (MC) is a special type of breast cancer. It comprises 4% (1-7%) of all invasive breast cancer. MC is also called colloid breast cancer characterised by nests of cells floating in lakes of mucin. It is divided into two subtypes Pure Mucinous Carcinoma (PMC) and Mixed Mucinous Carcinoma (MMC). PMC classified into two main types according to its structural and cytological features type A (paucicellular) the classical variant with a large amount of extracellular mucin, and type B (hypercellular) a hypercellular variant with less mucin and often with neuroendocrine differentiation. Hormone receptors, Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor-2 (HER2) and MUC2 status play an important role in prognosis and management.

Aim: To study histopathological features of MC breast and Immunohistochemical (IHC) status.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective study of patients who presented with breast cancer were studied at Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. The study was analysed in June 2002 and authors included data from January 2021 to June 2022. The data included the age at diagnosis, Tumour (T), Lymph Nodes (N), and Metastases (M) (TNM) stage, presence and number of Lymph Node (LN) metastases, Oestrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR), HER2 and MUC2 status. The patients in whom the diagnosis of MC of breast was given on histopathology were only included in the study. Patients of breast cancer of other pathological types were excluded from the detailed study. Descriptive statistics like mean, tables, and charts were used with the help of Microsoft office 2007 to interpret the results.

Results: A total of 245 patients reported as invasive breast cancer during 18 months of study period, out of which 12 cases diagnosed as MC were taken in study. Amongst 12 cases, eight cases were PMC and four cases were MMC. The mean age at presentation was 63.37±16.38 years (eight PMC) and 60.0±19.30 years (four MMC). A total of 11 out of 12 cases were females and only one was male case (PMC). Majority of PMC 04 (50.0%) and MMC 03 (75.0%) were observed to be in TNM Stage 2, and four of 12 cases of MC had LN metastasis with no distant metastasis. MC showed higher expression of hormone receptors and lower expression of HER2/neu and MUC2 positivity, which corroborates with other studies and concluded that, MC with such an immunohistochemistry profile was prognostically better.

Conclusion: Mucinous Breast Carcinoma (MBC) is a rare type of breast cancer accounting for about 4% of all diagnosed breast cancers. These are associated with a better long-term prognosis than other breast cancers. Hormone receptors and HER2 status play an important role in prognosis and management. MUC2 also plays a major role in mediating the proliferation, apoptosis, metastases of breast cancer cells and determining the use of chemotherapy drugs.

Keywords

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, Oestrogen receptor, Progesterone receptor

The MC is a special type of breast cancer that presents with a large amount of extracellular mucin. It comprises 4% (1-7%) of all invasive breast cancer (1). MC is also called colloid breast cancer characterised by nests of cells floating in lakes of mucin partitioned by delicate fibrous septae containing capillary blood vessels (2). It is divided into two subtypes: PMC and MMC (3). Hormone receptors and HER2 status play an important role in prognosis and management (4).

Mucins are high molecular-weight glycoproteins having oligosaccharides attached to serine or threonine residues of the mucin core protein backbone by O-glycosidic linkages. MUC2 expression is associated with the less aggressive biological properties of MC than invasive ductal carcinoma through the production of abundant extracellular mucin forming the characteristic configuration, since MUC2 is a gel-forming secretory mucin (5). PMC classified into two main types according to its structural and cytological features: type A (paucicellular), the classical variant with a large amount of extracellular mucin, and type B (hypercellular), a hypercellular variant with less mucin and often with neuroendocrine differentiation (6). MUC2 is not expressed in the normal breast, however expressed in 1/3rd of Ductal Carcinoma In-situ (DCIS) and Lobular Carcinoma In-situ (LCIS) lesions and in invasive breast cancer and reviewed in implicating MUC2 in cancer progression (7).

Study Objectives

• To study pathologic features of MC of breast.
• To determine features of PMC and MMC.
• To understand immunohistochemical role of MC of breast with literature correlation for prognosis.

Material and Methods

A retrospective study of patients, who presented with breast cancer was studied at Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. The study was analysed in June 2002 and authors included data from January 2021 to June 2022. All procedures performed in the current study were approved by Institutional Ethical Committee in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and later amendments (IEC Approval number 412/2020-2021, Date 22/01/2021).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The patients in whom the diagnosis of MC of breast (both PMC and MMC) was given on histopathology were only included in the study. Patients of breast cancer of other pathological types were excluded from the detailed study.

The data included the age at presentation, gender of the subjects, TNM staging, LN metastases based on histopathological data, ER, PR, HER2 (HER2/neu), and MUC2 status. All the cases satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study.

Study Procedure

A brief history of illness was obtained from request forms. The specimens were than fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Sections from representative areas were taken and paraffin blocks were made following standard protocol. Four micron sections were cut-stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) according to standard procedures.

Diagnosis of MC was rendered based on histological features, i.e., nests and clusters of tumour cells floating in pools of extracellular mucin. IHC stains (supplied by PathnSitu Biotechnologies) were applied to evaluate ER, PR, HER2/neu, and MUC2 status. More than 1% nuclear expression of ER and PR in tumour cells was taken positive. For HER2/neu, strong and complete membranous expression in more than 10% tumour cells was labelled as positive. MUC2 positivity was indicated when more than 10% of tumour expressed. In addition, subcellular localisation of MUC2 expression was assigned as follows: luminal/apical, luminal/apical +cytoplasmic, and membranocytoplasmic expressions.

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered into Microsoft excel data sheet and was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 22.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Somers NY, USA). Normality of the continuous data, was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous data was represented as mean and standard deviation. Categorical data was represented in the form of frequencies and proportions. Independent t-test was used as test of significance to identify the mean difference between two quantitative variables. Chi-square test was used as test of significance for qualitative data. The p-value (probability that the result is true) of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant, after assuming all the rules of statistical tests.

Results

A total of 245 patients reported as invasive breast cancer during 18 months of study period, out of which 12 cases diagnosed as MC were taken in study. Then specimen was examined grossly and microscopically (Table/Fig 1).

Amongst 12 cases, 8 cases were PMC (66.66%) and 4 cases were MMC (33.33%). The mean age at presentation was 63.37±16.38 years among the cases with PMC, and 60.00±19.30 years among the cases with MMC. Eleven out of 12 cases (91.6%) were females and remaining 1 case (8.3%) was male, who got diagnosed with PMC. There exists no association of age at presentation and gender with respect to type of MC. TNM staging of PMC Grade one was one case with pT1c pN0 pM0. Grade two had four cases with pT2 pN0 pM0. Grade three had no cases. Grade four had three cases pT4 pNx pM0, pT4 pN0 pM0, pT4b pN1 pM0, respectively. MMC grade one and grade three no case was present. Grade two had three cases pT2 pN0, pT2a pN3a, pT2 pN1, respectively. Grade four had one case pT4b pN1a pM0. Majority of PMC (4 out of 8; 50.0%) and MMC (3 out of 4; 75.0%) were observed to be in TNM stage two. The study found no association between type of MC and TNM staging (Table/Fig 2).

Based on histopathological data, 4 out of 12 cases (33.3%) had LN metastasis with no distant metastasis, where majority of PMC were LN negative for metastasis (7 out of 8; 87.5%), while majority of MMC were LN positive for metastasis (3 out of 4; 75.0%). The study also established association between type of MC and LN metastasis based on histopathological data (Table/Fig 2).

The ER and PR were positive and HER2/neu was negative in all the cases, irrespective of the type of MC. This suggested that all the MC cases presented with significant number of receptors for both oestrogen and progesterone, while negative for HER2 (Table/Fig 2).

On analysing the expression of MUC2, majority of PMC were luminal or apical (4 out of 8; 50.0%), while 3 out of 8 were luminal or apical+cytoplasmic (37.5%), and remaining 1 was membranocytoplasmic (12.5%). Among the cases with MMC, 2 out of 4 were membranocytoplasmic (50.0%), and remaining 2 were MUC2 negative (50.0%). Hence, the study showed statistically significant association between type of MC and MUC2 expression (Table/Fig 2).

Discussion

The MC of the breast is rare in clinical practice and includes approximately 4% (1%-7%) of all invasive breast cancers (1). Pure mucinous tumours have a good prognosis. Mixed mucinous cancers have a poor prognosis (3). In the present study, we found that the proportion of MC is low, as only 12 cases of MC were identified compared to 245 cases of invasive breast cancer in the same study period. However, MC was noted to have better prognostic characteristics, such as lower tumour grade. Moreover, MC showed a prognostically better IHC profile, i.e., higher expression of hormone receptors and lower expression of HER2/neu and MUC2 positivity.

It is more common, especially in the perimenopausal and postmenopausal age groups (2). In the present study, the mean age at presentation was 63.37±16.38 years in PMC cases, which was comparatively higher than that in MMC cases with mean age of 60.00±19.30 years. This is similar to the studies such as Bagga PK et al., and Marrazzo E et al., where the mean age at presentation was 63.60 years and 64.40 years, respectively (2),(8). However, on the contrary, in the study by Skotnicki P et al., where the mean age in PMC was lower (64 versus 66 years) than in patients with MMC (9). Also, in certain studies like Yang M et al., and Hashmi AA et al., the presentation of MC is observed in comparatively younger population, where the mean age was 55.28±15.73 years and 56.47±13.90 years, respectively (3),(4).

MC of the breast is rare in clinical practice and includes approximately 4% (1-7%) of all invasive breast cancers. It is divided into pure and mixed subtypes. Even in our study, MC accounted for 4.8% (12/245) of all invasive breast cancers diagnosed during the 18 months study period, whilst PMC comprised of only 3.3% (8/245), and MMC of 1.6% (4/245). The study by Bagga PK et al., accounted for 1.5% (10/658) of all invasive breast cancers diagnosed during the 10 years study period, whilst PMC comprised of only 0.3% (2/658) (2). Also, Hashmi AA et al., correlated with the present study, as 2.9% (38/1268) cases of MC were diagnosed in a span of eight years (4).

The PMC displays indolent behaviour, and mucin comprises the majority of the tumour volume. The authors found that the tumour size was T1 in one case, T2 in four and T4 in three cases of PMC, which is more in proportion with respect to MMC, where T2 and T4 were observed in three and one case, respectively. This can be substantiated by the findings from the study by Skotnicki P et al., which found T1-T2 TNM stage (91.4% vs 85.0%), and pT1 (44.3% vs 42.5%) of PMBC and MMBC, respectively (9). The volume of mucin contributes to an overestimation of tumour size, and thus early detection could contribute to the very good prognosis.

Like IDC, MC metastasise to axillary LN, and therefore determining the nodal status is the most important factor in the management of MC. In our study, LN metastasis was noted in 33.3% cases of MC. It has also been reported in the literature (Table/Fig 3) that PMC is unlikely to metastasise to axillary LN and the presence of LN metastasis indicates that the tumour may be an MMC rather than PMC (8),(9),(10).

According to the literature, ER and PR expression often found in a high percentage, and low rate of HER2/neu expression is observed in MC, which can be appreciated even in the present study, as shown in (Table/Fig 4) (1),(3),(4),(7).

Secreted mucins like MUC2 can be intracellular, extracellular or both. In the present study, MUC2 expression was observed in 83.3% (10/12) cases (100.0% in PMC, and 50.0% in MMC). The study also established statistically significant association of MUC2 expression, with respect to type of MC. As there are less studies ours was is in correlation with the findings from the study by Kim D et al., (Table/Fig 5) (7). Similarly, according to the study by Rakha EA et al., (5), MUC2 expression was noticed in around 81.3% of MCs, thereby signifying its role in determining the aggressiveness and prognosis of tumour. Also, the study by Astashchanka A et al., emphasises on the role of MUC2 in modulating the aggressiveness and prognosis of breast cancer (6).

Limitation(s)

Major limitations of the present study were, it was retrospective study, and number of MC cases was very low. Moreover, follow-up of the patients was not available to compare the difference in overall survival and disease-free survival between PMC and MMC cases. Further analysis of a larger number of patients is required to understand its prognostic significance.

Conclusion

The MBC is a rare type of breast cancer accounting for about 4% of all diagnosed breast cancers. These are associated with a better long-term prognosis than other breast cancers. Hormone receptors and HER2 status play an important role in prognosis and management. MUC2 also plays a major role in mediating the proliferation, apoptosis, metastases of breast cancer cells and determining the use of chemotherapy drugs like paclitaxel have shown to be effective in management.

References

1.
Lei L, Yu X, Chen B, Chen Z, Wang X. Clinicopathological characteristics of mucinous breast cancer: A retrospective analysis of a 10-year study. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155132. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Bagga PK, Paul S, Jaideep SA, Chug J. Mucinous carcinoma breast-experience of a tertiary care centre of North India. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2016;3:3210-13.
3.
Yang M, Li X, Pang CH, Huang LP. Pure mucinous breast carcinoma: A favorable subtype. Breast Care (Basel). 2013;8(1):56-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Hashmi AA, Zia S, Yaqeen SR, Ahmed O, Asghar IA, Islam S, et al. Mucinous breast carcinoma: Clinicopathological comparison with invasive ductal carcinoma. Cureus. 2021;13(3):e13650. [crossref]
5.
Rakha EA, Boyce RW, El-Rehim A, Kurien T, Green AR, Paish EC, et al. Expression of mucins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC3, MUC4, MUC5AC and MUC6) and their prognostic significance in human breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(10):1295-304. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Astashchanka A, Shroka TM, Jacobsen BM. Mucin 2 (MUC2) modulates the aggressiveness of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(2):289-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Kim D, Jung WH, Koo JS. Expression of MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC5B in mucinous lesions of the breast. Pathobiol. 2012;79(3):144-53.[crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Marrazzo E, Frusone F, Milana F, Sagona A, Gatzemeier W, Barbieri E, et al. Mucinous breast cancer: A narrative review of the literature and a retrospective tertiary single-centre analysis. Breast. 2020;49:87-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Skotnicki P, Sas-Korczynska B, Strzepek L, Jakubowicz J, Blecharz P, Reinfuss M, et al. Pure and mixed mucinous carcinoma of the breast: A comparison of clinical outcomes and treatment results. Breast J. 2016;22(5):529-34. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Ranade A, Batra R, Sandhu G, Chitale RA, Balderacchi J. Clinicopathological evaluation of 100 cases of mucinous carcinoma of breast with emphasis on axillary staging and special reference to a micropapillary pattern. J Clin Pathol. 2010;63(12):1043-47.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59891.17523

Date of Submission: Aug 27, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Sep 14, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Oct 30, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 06, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 07, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 25, 2022 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com