Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 204131

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : EC26 - EC30 Full Version

Clinicopathological Study of Testicular Lesions in a Tertiary Care Centre of Dakshina Kannada, India


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58575.17529
KP Athira, T Umashankar, Mohit Kumar

1. Postgraduate, Department of Pathology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor, Department of Pathology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. 3. Postgraduate, Department of Pathology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
KP Athira,
Postgraduate, Department of Pathology, FMMC, Mangalore, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: athirachithra@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Testicular biopsies are performed for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Diagnostic testicular biopsies are usually performed as a part of a male infertility work-up. Therapeutic testicular excision biopsies are performed for a wide range of disorders, including neoplastic lesions, inflammatory lesions, cryptorchidism, testicular trauma, and as a part of prophylactic treatment of carcinoma prostate.

Aim: To evaluate the indications for orchidectomy and diagnostic testicular biopsies and to understand the histopathological spectrum of testicular lesions and concordance with clinical diagnosis.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in the Department of Pathology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. The study period is from July 2017 to June 2020. Data was collected and analysed in August 2020. All testis’ biopsies, including excision and diagnostic biopsies, are included in the study. Histopathological findings and the clinical diagnosis were evaluated for concordance. Data were tabulated and statistically evaluated for age distribution, laterality, and frequency using Microsoft excel 2021. Percentages for the variables and concordance rate were calculated.

Results: A total of 139 cases (mean age 54.5 years) were included in the study. Prophylactic orchidectomy for carcinoma prostate (64/139=46.04%) was the most common clinical indication. Non neoplastic lesions account for 48.20% (67/139). Frequent non neoplastic lesions are testicular torsion (23/139=16.55%) and abscess (12/139=8.63%), followed by cryptorchidism (9/139=6.47%). Left-sided lesions are more frequent than right-sided lesions. Histopathology confirmed two cases of suspected male infertility and Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS). Neoplastic lesion accounts to 6.47% (9/139). Frequent neoplasm in the study was seminoma (3/139=2.16%), followed by lymphoma (2/139=1.44%). Other neoplasms included in the study were mixed germ cell tumours, postpubertal teratoma, and spermatocytic tumour. Testicular tuberculosis accounts to 1.44% (2/139) in the present population.

Conclusion: Non neoplastic lesions were common compared to testicular neoplasms. Testicular torsion, followed by abscess, was the most common indication for orchidectomy. Testicular Tuberculosis can mimic a neoplasm on clinical and radiological work-up. Hence, careful evaluation has to be performed in young suspected cases of tuberculosis.

Keywords

Androgen insensitivity syndrome, Cryptorchidism, Germ cell neoplasm, Orchidectomy, Seminoma, Teratoma, Testicular neoplasm

The testis is a paired organ with reproductive function and is involved in producing hormones (1). It is suspended by a spermatic cord and lies within the scrotum (2). Testis produces spermatozoa and also secretes testosterone (3). Testicular lesions include neoplastic and non neoplastic lesions (4). Non neoplastic lesions of the testis are frequent. Neoplastic testicular lesions account for only 1% of all malignancies in males worldwide (5),(6). However, they are the fourth most common cause of malignancy-related deaths in young males (7),(8).

Testicular lesions usually present as a scrotal mass, pain in the groin, or an abdominal mass (9). Non neoplastic lesions include cryptorchidism, atrophic testis, trauma, torsion testis, and infections (10). Testicular malignancies commonly occur in the second to fourth decade of life (11),(12). Also, the incidence of malignancy reduces with the advancement of age (13),(14). About 95% of testicular malignancies are germ cell tumours, with many predisposing factors such as cryptorchidism, strong family history, Klinefelter syndrome, and the presence of germ cell tumours in the contralateral testis (15).

Testicular swellings are considered to be malignant until proven otherwise (16). Hence, imaging studies play an essential role in the initial assessment along with the history and examination (17). Ultrasonography and doppler studies help to diagnose neoplasms as well as infectious lesions with secondary changes. Assessing the blood supply status helps detect testicular torsion in children early. In case of inconclusive ultrasonographic findings, magnetic resonance imaging can opt for a better understanding (18). Despite advanced imaging studies and tumour marker assays, the most reliant diagnosis is based on histopathological examination (19).

Testicular biopsies are performed for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Diagnostic testicular biopsies are performed as a part of a male infertility work-up (1). Therapeutic testicular excision biopsies are performed for a wide range of disorders that includes neoplastic lesions, inflammatory lesions, cryptorchidism, testicular trauma, and as a part of prophylactic treatment of carcinoma prostate (6).

This study is undertaken to evaluate the indications for orchidectomy and diagnostic testicular biopsies. And also aims to understand the histopathological spectrum of testicular lesions along with evaluating the concordance with the clinical diagnosis. This aids pathologists in providing a histopathological diagnosis with clinical significance.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted in the Department of Pathology, Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India. The study period was from July 2017 to June 2020. Data was collected and analysed in August 2020. The study was initiated after obtaining ethical clearance (FMIEC/CCM/431/2020).

Inclusion criteria: All testicular biopsies received in the pathology department during the study were included.

Exclusion criteria: Para-testicular biopsies were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Estimated minimum sample size was 120, with a confidence interval of 95% and attributable error of 5%.

Study Procedure

Specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, and multiple representative sections were obtained from the testis. After tissue processing, slides were stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E). Relevant clinical details like age, laterality and clinical diagnosis were recorded. Histopathological analysis of the tissue was performed, and the findings were recorded. Further, the histopathological findings and their concordance with the clinical diagnosis were evaluated.

Statistical Analysis

Data were tabulated and statistically evaluated for age distribution, laterality, and frequency using Microsoft Excel 2021. Percentages for the variables were calculated. The concordance between histopathological diagnosis and clinical diagnosis was evaluated using tables. And then the corcordance rate was calculated.

Results

This study included 139 cases received in the department of pathology for a period of three years. Majority of the cases were in the age range of 61-70 years (41/139=29.5%), followed by 71-80 years (24/139=17.27%). The mean age was found to be 54.5 years. The age range and frequency is depicted in (Table/Fig 1).

Among the 139 cases included in the study, 49% (68/139) of the cases underwent bilateral orchidectomy. Majority of these procedures were performed in association with treatment for carcinoma prostate. Left-sided orchidectomy accounts to 27% (38/139) and right-sided orchidectomy accounts to 23% (33/139).

Orchidectomy is performed for a wide variety of clinical indications in the present study. Bilateral orchidectomy as a part of prophylaxis in patients with carcinoma prostate (64/139=46.04%) was the most common clinical indication, followed by torsion testis (21/139=15.11%), pyocele (10/139=7.19%) and testicular neoplasm (10/139=7.19%). Other clinical indications were cryptorchidism, epididymo-orchitis, hydrocele, testicular trauma, abscess, and tuberculosis. Histopathological evaluation was solicited to confirm the clinical diagnosis of AIS in two cases (1.44%). The single diagnostic testicular biopsy received was evaluated for the cause of male infertility. Frequency of clinical diagnosis is depicted in (Table/Fig 2).

On microscopic evaluation, 45.32% (63/139) cases were found to have a normal histomorphology. Bilateral orchidectomy was performed in majority of these cases, as a part of prophylactic treatment for carcinoma prostate. Non neoplastic pathologies were identified in 48.20% (67/139) cases. The most common 27non neoplastic lesion was testicular torsion (18/139=17.99%), followed by testicular abscess (12/139=8.63%). A 74% of testicular torsion was found in patients below 20 years. Epididymo-orchitis (9/139=6.47%) and cryptorchidism (9/139=6.47% were not uncommon in the study.

Neoplastic testicular pathologies accounts to 6.47% (9/139). Classical seminoma (3/139=2.16%), followed by lymphoma (2/139=1.44%) were the common neoplastic lesions in the current study. Histopathological diagnosis and their frequency are detailed in (Table/Fig 3).

Histopathological and clinical diagnosis was evaluated to assess the concordance of diagnosis. Calculated concordance rate was 99.22%. Majority of the clinical diagnosis were in concordance with the histopathological diagnosis, with a single discordant case. (Table/Fig 4) depicts the concordance between histopathology and clinical diagnosis of all testicular lesions.

Among the 64 cases (64/139=46.04%), who underwent bilateral orchidectomy as a part of carcinoma prostate prophylactic treatment, 61 were found to have normal histomorphology. Rest of the three cases shows features of epididymo-orchitis. Orchidectomy performed during inguinal hernia repair and penectomy also showed normal histomorphology. All cases of cryptorchid testis (9/139=6.47%) evaluated were negative for Germ Cell Neoplasia In-situ (GCNIS) or any malignancy. Among the cases of hydrocele, a majority (5/6) bear testicular atrophy, and one case showed features of testicular torsion. A majority (9/10) of clinically suspected cases of pyocele were diagnosed to have a testicular abscess.

Cases for infertility evaluation (2/139=1.44%) were validated to have germ cell aplasia and incomplete maturation arrest. Germ cell aplasia is characterised by decreased diameter of tubules and absence of maturing germ cell layers. (Table/Fig 5) show the microscopic view of germ cell aplasia. Another case of filarial hydrocele was diagnosed to have incomplete maturation arrest.

The clinical diagnosis of AIS was confirmed in both cases with histopathology. Two cases of granulomatous epididymo-orchitis were noted; one of them was clinically evaluated as a testicular neoplasm.This was the single case in the study which has discordance between clinical and histopathological diagnosis. (Table/Fig 6) shows the discordant case which was clinically diagnosed as testicular neoplasm. Granulomatous inflammation with central necrosis is shown.

Nine neoplastic lesions are included in the study. Malignant lesions are found to be more common than benign lesions. Germ cell tumours (6/9) are found to be the most common neoplasm in the present study. They include seminoma (3/9), mixed germ cell tumour (1/9), postpubertal teratoma (1/9) and spermatocytic tumour (1/9). Other neoplastic lesions are testicular lymphoma (2/9) and leydig cell tumour (1/9). Leydig cell tumour, which is a sex cord stromal tumour is the only benign neoplasm included in the study.

Microscopy of seminoma has tumour cells in sheets or lobules separated by fibrous septae with lymphocytic infiltrates. Lymphoma comprises of discohesive, pleomorphic malignant cells with irregular nuclei and prominent nucleoli. Mixed germ cell tumours commonly have a combination of embryonal carcinoma and yolk sac tumour. Postpubertal teratoma has a heterogenous cut surface with solid and cystic components (Table/Fig 7). Microscopy shows multiple cyst lined by glandular/squamous epithelium and GCNIS component. Mesenchymal, neuro-ectodermal and neural tissue can also be seen. (Table/Fig 8) shows the gross and microscopic appearance of postpubertal teratoma.

Discussion

Non neoplastic lesions (93.52%) of the testis are more common than neoplastic lesions. Testicular torsion (16.55%), followed by a testicular abscess (8.63%), and cryptorchidism (6.47%) are the most common non neoplastic lesions in the current study. Similar observations were made in earlier studies by Reddy H et al., and Dhawle M et al., (5),(8).

Male factors contribute to 20% of the causes of infertility. Hypospermatogenesis, maturation arrest, and germ cell aplasia are the common histological changes found in male infertility. The present study includes two cases of male infertility under evaluation. Germ cell aplasia with focal spermatogenesis and incomplete maturation arrest was noted in those cases. Correlation with sperm count and morphology helps in the evaluation of these cases. Oligospermia is noted in incomplete maturation arrest, and azoospermia is in complete maturation arrest. A recent autopsy study has found that men with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection have developed impaired hormonal function and fertility-related issues. The histological findings include lymphocytic infiltrate, thickening of the tubular basement membrane, scarcity of Leydig cells, and decreased spermatogenesis. The present study includes a case of filarial hydrocele for which orchidectomy was performed as a part of the treatment. Histopathological evaluation of the testis revealed incomplete maturation arrest. The majority of the hydrocele cases in the current study are noted to have an atrophic testis on microscopic evaluation. Hence, these factors also contribute to male infertility (1),(20).

Testicular tuberculosis is relatively rare and amounts to 3% of genital tuberculosis. On ultrasound imaging, testicular tuberculosis presents as diffusely enlarged heterogenous or homogenous hypoechoic lesions, which mimics a neoplasm. Thus, testicular neoplasms should be considered a differential diagnosis in suspected cases. The present study includes two (1.44%) cases of granulomatous epididymo-orchitis with caseous necrosis. One among them was clinically evaluated as a testicular neoplasm. Zeihl-Neelsen stain was performed in both cases but was found negative for Acid-Fast Bacilli (AFB). Similarly, Das A et al., observed that it is highly uncommon to find the presence of AFB in testicular tuberculosis. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) studies opted for confirmation. Das A et al., suggest opting for Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) as the preliminary investigation before testicular biopsy or orchidectomy in young suspected cases of testicular tuberculosis. Sample can be obtained for PCR studies as well during the procedure. Thus the patient receives treatment at the earliest (21).

According to Chaudhry S et al., AIS cases have a risk of developing GCNIS in early adulthood and frank malignancies after thirty years. Benign lesions include sertoli cell adenoma and hamartoma. The present study includes two cases of AIS. On histopathological evaluation, Sertoli cell adenoma composed of small tubules populated by immature Sertoli cells, an increase in tubular density, and a relative decrease in Leydig cells were noted in these cases. The recent trend is to perform gonadectomy soon after puberty due to the risk of GCNIS in AIS. However, retaining the gonads till adulthood can improve the quality of life since natural testosterone is peripherally aromatised with oestrogen. Chaudhry S et al., support the current recommendation of retaining gonads till adulthood (22).

Cryptorchidism is a common congenital anomaly of the testis. It is associated with infertility and an increased risk of testicular malignancy. Hence, components of GCNIS, which are usually associated with germ cell tumours are to be searched for during histopathological evaluation. In the present study, cryptorchidism contributes to 6.47% of the cases. On histopathological evaluation, maturation arrest and atrophic changes were noted in these cases. GCNIS components were not identified in any of these cases (11).

Testicular neoplasms are the most common malignancies in young males, and the majority is of germ-cell origin. According to Globocan-2020 by World Health Organisation (WHO), the age-standardised incidence rate of testicular malignancy in the world is 1.8%. Based on the literature, seminoma, teratoma, and embryonal carcinoma are common in young adults, and spermatocytic tumours and lymphoma are common in the elderly. Malignant lesions of the testis are more common than benign ones. Similarly, the present study includes eight malignant lesions and one benign Leydig cell tumour (23).

Among the nine neoplastic lesions included in the study, the most common malignancy was seminoma (3/9=33%), followed by lymphoma (2/9=22%). Similar observation was given by Baidya R et al., (10). According to Reddy H et al., and Shruti G and Alok S teratoma is more common than lymphoma. Surhonne SP et al., and Abdulkadir A et al., observed that mixed germ cell tumour is the second most common neoplastic lesion after classic seminoma (Table/Fig 9) (8),(9),(10),(12),(14). No age predilection was observed for seminoma in the current study. Primary testicular lymphoma usually presents in the sixth decade of life. Similarly, both lymphoma cases were included in the current study presented in the sixth decade (8),(9),(10),(12),(14).

Postpubertal testicular teratoma is a malignant germ cell tumour and accounts for 2.7% to 7% of germ cell tumours. It has a higher risk of metastasis and is usually seen in young adults. These are firm and nodular tumours with heterogenous solid cystic cut surfaces. Similarly, in the present study, the case of postpubertal teratoma presented before 20 years, with a similar gross appearance (24).

Mixed germ cell tumours are malignant tumours with more than one germ cell component. These are clinically regarded as non seminomatous regardless of the presence or absence of seminomatous components. They are usually present by 30 years of age. The common combinations include embryonal carcinoma, seminoma, and yolk sac tumour. In the current study, the patient presented at 25 years with a 45% embryonal carcinoma component, 30% yolk sac tumour component, and 25% teratoma component. The presence and percentage of embryonal carcinoma are associated with a high-risk of metastasis and poor prognosis.

A spermatocytic tumour is a germ cell tumour unrelated to GCNIS. It usually presents in the fifth decade with an excellent prognosis. Tumours were presented in the fifth decade in the present study as well. These tumours rarely metastasise. OCT4 and MAGEA4 markers aid in differentiating spermatocytic tumours from typical seminoma (10),(11),(24).

Limitation(s)

The number of testicular neoplasms included in the study is relatively less. Hence, the neoplastic spectrum and age predilection of the tumours couldn’t be assessed well.

Conclusion

Non neoplastic lesions of the testis are more common than neoplastic lesions. Testicular torsion and abscess formation are the most common lesions amounting to orchidectomy in the study population. Though, prevalance of testicular tuberculosisis was less in the present study population. This lesion of infective aetiology can be misdiagnosed as a neoplasm with clinical and radiological findings. Hence, in a young suspected case, FNAC with PCR studies can be done as a preliminary investigation before testicular biopsy and orchidectomy.

References

1.
Nwafor C, Nwafor N. Morphologic patterns of testicular lesions in Uyo: A university hospital experience. Sahel Med J. 2019;22(1):18-22. [crossref]
2.
Sheela G, Supriya PP. Clinico-pathological study of testicular and paratesticular lesions. Int J Contemp Med Res. 2017;4(3):610-13.
3.
Tekumalla A, Ragi S, Thota R. Histopathological analysis of testicular lesions-a three year experience in a tertiary care center, Telangana. Trop J Pathol Microbiol. 2019;5(5):260-68. [crossref]
4.
Sharma M, Mahajan V, Suri J, Kaul K. Histopathological spectrum of testicular lesions-A retrospective study. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2017;4(3):437-41.
5.
Dhawle M, Tangde A, Joshi A, Bindu R. Clinicopathological study of testicular lesions. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019;7(4):1319-23. [crossref]
6.
Patel M, Goswami H, Parikh UR, Mehta N. Histo-pathological study of testicular lesions. Gujarath Medical Journal. 2015;70(1):41-46.
7.
Singh RK, Soren S. Histopathological study of testicular lesions at RIMS, Ranchi. Int J Sci Res. 2020;9(5):10-11.
8.
Reddy H, Chawda H, Dombale VD. Histomorphological analysis of testicular lesions. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2016;3(4):558. [crossref]
9.
Abdulkadir A, Sanusi H, Alhaji S. Histopathological pattern of testicular lesions in Kano, Northwestern Nigeria. Niger J Surg. 2019;25(2):158. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Baidya R, Sigdel B, Baidya N. Histopathological pattern of testicular lesion. J Pathol Nepal. 2017;7(1):1087-90. [crossref]
11.
Hussain SI, Akhter G, Reshi R, Farooq S, Sideeq F. Histopathological spectrum of lesions in orchidectomy specimens-A clinicopathological study in tertiary care hospital. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2018;6(12):749-55. Doi: 10.18535/jmscr/v6i12.122. [crossref]
12.
Surhonne SP, Surhonne AP, Gosavi AV, Agashe SR, Phansopkar MA. Clinicopathological study of testicular tumors. J Med Sci. 2018;4(3):63-70. [crossref]
13.
Sarier M, Tunç M, Özel E, Duman I ?, Kaya S, Hos¸ can MB, et al. Evaluation of histopathologic results of testicular tumors in antalya: Multi center study. Bull Urooncology. 2020;19(2):64-67. [crossref]
14.
Shruti G, Alok S. Clinicopathologic study of testicular tumors: A review of 50 cases. Int J Health Sci. 2015;(10):6. https://www.ijhsr.org/IJHSR_Vol.5_ Issue.10_Oct2015/46.pdf.
15.
Reddy H, Dombale V. Histopathological spectrum of testicular tumors. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2017;6(3):1. [crossref]
16.
Mittal PK, Abdalla AS, Chatterjee A, Baumgarten DA, Harri PA, Patel J, et al. Spectrum of extratesticular and testicular pathologic conditions at scrotal MR imaging. RadioGraphics. 2018;38(3):806-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Devlies W, Seghers M, Dilen K. Case report on secondary testicular necrosis due to fulminant epididymitis: Ultrasonographic evaluation and diagnosis. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):115. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Sangüesa C, Veiga D, Llavador M, Serrano A. Testicular tumours in children: An approach to diagnosis and management with pathologic correlation. Insights Imaging. 2020;11(1):74. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Ellati RT, Kavoussi PK, Turner TT, Lysiak JJ. Twist and shout: A clinical and experimental review of testicular torsion. Korean J Urol. 2009;50(12):1159. [crossref]
20.
Duarte-Neto AN, Teixeira TA, Caldini EG, Kanamura CT, Gomes-Gouvea MS, dos Santos ABG, et al. Testicular pathology in fatal COVID-19. A descriptive autopsy study. Andrology. 2021;10(1):13-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Das A, Batabyal S, Bhattacharjee S, Sengupta A. A rare case of isolated testicular tuberculosis and review of literature. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2016;5(2):468-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Chaudhry S, Tadokoro-Cuccaro R, Hannema SE, Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Frequency of gonadal tumours in complete androgen insensitivity syndrome (CAIS): A retrospective case-series analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(5):498-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
International agency for research on cancer. Testis fact sheets [Internet]. World Health Organisation. [cited 2020 Dec 19]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/ today/data/factsheets/populations/356-india-fact-sheets.pdf.
24.
Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2016;356-57. https://publications.iarc.fr/Book-And-Report-Series/Who- Classification-Of-Tumours/WHO-Classification-Of-Tumours-Of-The-Urinary- System-And-Male-Genital-Organs-2016.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58575.17529

Date of Submission: Jul 18, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Sep 02, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 08, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 19, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 21, 2022, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 07, 2022 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com