Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 335288

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : LC01 - LC09 Full Version

Repercussions of Consanguinity on Metrical Traits at Different Phases of Growth


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59254.17440
Gulrukh Begum

1. Professor and Head, Department of Anthropology, Gauhati University, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Correspondence Address :
Gulrukh Begum,
Professor and Head, Department of Anthropology, Gauhati University, Guwahati-781014, Assam, India.
E-mail: gulrukhbegum@gauhati.ac.in

Abstract

Introduction: Consanguinity is associated with increase in the likelihood of receiving two copies of deleterious gene from parents, which brings the hidden recessive disorders. This further increases the risk of neonatal and post neonatal mortality. Some of which may also have negative effect on metrical traits of the children, thereby affecting their development and reducing their cognitive abilities.

Aim: To examine the effect of parental consanguinity on various metrical traits like linear, circumferential and weight measurements among the Muslim males.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted amongst the Muslim males living in the different river islands of Barpeta district in Assam. The study consisted 1438 males (587 inbred and 851 non inbred). A total of 936 boys (3-18 years) were measured at an interval of one year. The rest (502 adult men) from 19-60 years were in age cohorts of five-years age interval. They were measured for stature, sitting height, lower extremity length, body weight, waist circumference, abdominal circumference and hip circumference. Inbreeding depression on trait was calculated using average coefficient of inbreeding and % of depression in a trait. Wright’s path coefficient method was used for the calculation of inbreeding coefficient.

Results: The average coefficient of inbreeding was found to be 0.01637931154. A significant increase in the difference of mean values in all the linear, circumferential and weight measurements has been observed at many ages with the increase in the inbreeding coefficient during childhood and adolescence phase of life. But the difference in mean variance in the adult body parameters between the inbred and non inbred was statistically insignificant at almost all ages (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Consanguinity has not affected any of the adult body measurements. A significant positive association between consanguinity and diminution of body measurements found during the growing period needs to be correlated with the other socio-demographic variables because the growing period is always more dependent on environmental variables.

Keywords

Anthropometric measurements, Assam, Inbreeding depression, Males, Phases of life, River islands

Consanguinity is a deeply rooted social trend among one-fifth of the world population mostly residing in the Middle East, West Asia and North Africa, as well as among emigrants from these communities which now residing in North America, Europe and Australia (1),(2). A consanguineous marriage is defined as a union between two individuals who are related as second cousins or closer (3).

There is a long tradition of consanguineous marriage in many communities throughout the world. It is usually associated with demographic features, such as religion, educational level, socio-economic status, geography (including urban/rural community, size of the area, isolation of the population), consanguinity among the parent’s marriages and the respondent’s attitudes towards consanguinity (4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11). In populations of North Africa, West Asia and South India, consanguineous marriages are culturally and socially favoured and constitute 20-50% of all marriages, with first cousin unions accounting for almost one-third of all marriages (12),(13). In the Arab world and Middle East, family tradition, maintenance of family structure and property, strengthening of family ties, financial advantage, ease of marital arrangements, better relationships between wife and her in-laws, and enhanced marriage stability and durability are the main reasons of the practise (14).

Analysis from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) data has shown the prevalence of consanguineous marriage as 9.9% in India. The Southern region of India with 23% and North-East region with 3.1% being the highest and lowest prevalence (15).

The health implications of consanguineous marriages are rather more important. It not only increases the risk of expression of autosomal recessive conditions in the offspring [16-19] but also makes other morbid conditions more prominent (20),(21). It reduces the genetic variation in any population group; some of which may negatively affect weight and height of children also. Children born into consanguineous unions have lower cognitive scores, lower height-for-age, and a higher likelihood of being severely stunted (1). From National Family and Health Survey-4 data, the prevalence of childhood stunting was found to be higher among male child (40%) than the female child (38.0%) among ever-married women who have married their blood relatives (22).

The frequency of cousin marriage varies widely across cultural boundaries. It may remain culturally desirable in some communities but the adverse health effects are foremost to be recognised. This consists an increased genetic risk to offspring and a high incidence of congenital pathology in new-borns (18). There is an absolute lack of study assessing the impact of consanguinity on the metric traits in the entire North Eastern states of India. The present study therefore was an attempt to examine the effect of parental consanguinity on various metrical traits among the Muslims living in the riverine areas of Barpeta district in Assam, India. The metrical traits included were linear measures, circumferential measures and body weight of the children and adults in the different phases of life-childhood, adolescence, adulthood.

Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional study was conducted amongst the Muslims living in the different river islands of Barpeta district in Assam, India. Some of these islands are permanent, some are semi-permanent and some are temporary river islands that can be wiped out by erosion during recurrent floods (Table/Fig 1). Field work was carried out in the year 2019. Before data collection, a pilot study was conducted and the villagers were briefed about the purpose and nature of the study. Only after taking informed consent, data was collected. The study was conducted with the approval from the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee Gauhati University vide approval no. IAEC/Per/2022/PP-IAEC/2022-09-1.

Inclusion criteria:

• The male villagers from 3≤ years to ≤70 years who were willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria:

• Anyone who was unwilling to participate.
• Anyone with limited physical activity having medical, surgical, neurological conditions or musculoskeletal disorders.

Sample size calculation: The sample size of the present study was 1438 males which was collected by purposive sampling method. The sample size was calculated with the help of Open Epi open-source software version 3.01, 2006. The sample size falls under 90% confidence interval of the total population with anticipated frequency of 50% and design effect of 1.0. The calculated sample size was 385 out of total Muslim population in Barpeta district, which is 1,198,036 [Census of India, 2011] (23).

The samples were further subdivided into inbred and non inbred. Family pedigrees were drawn to access the consanguinity status and then the subject’s inbreeding status was determined. A total of 993 boys from 3-20 years were measured at an interval of one year. Since maturity in linear growth does not cease entirely until maturity is reached, at about 18 years in girls and 20 years in boys (24), therefore adult age categorisation has been done after 20 years onwards. The rest 445 were adult men from >20 to 70 years of age and were grouped in age cohorts of five-year age interval.

Study Procedure

The coefficient of inbreeding (F) was calculated for each couple and the mean coefficient of inbreeding (α) estimated for the population. Inbreeding coefficient (F) was calculated applying Wright’s path coefficient method (25). The coefficient of inbreeding (F) is the probability that two alleles at any locus are identical by descent from the common ancestor (s) of two parents. The F values are in the order: double first cousin (F=0.125) >first cousin (F=0.0625) >first cousin once removed (F=0.03125) >second cousin (F=0.0156). First cousin once removed applies to the relation between an individual and the offspring of one of his first cousins (26). In non consanguineous families, the coefficient of inbreeding is effectively zero (F=0.000). Finally, the subjects were divided into the low and high inbreeding levels, the former below F<0.625 and the latter with F≥0.625.

Where,
n is the number of connecting links between the two parents through common ancestors. FA is the coefficient of inbreeding of the common ancestor A. Inbreeding depression on trait was calculated using average coefficient of inbreeding and % of depression in a trait.

At the population level, the mean level of inbreeding (α) was calculated according to the formula:

α=S pi Fi

where, S is the summation of the proportion of individuals pi in each consanguinity category Fi (25).
The mean or average coefficient of inbreeding (α) provides a measure of the intensity of inbreeding in the population. α represents a measure of the proportion of loci at which the offspring of a consanguineous union is expected to inherit gene copies from both the parents. Higher is the value of (α), higher is the risk of health issues, indicating increased homozygosity for any harmful gene (27).

% Mean depression in trait is calculated as follows:

(Non inbred)-x-(inbred)×100x/ x-(inbred)

The x- indicates the mean value of the trait (28)

The subjects were measured for stature, sitting height, lower extremity length, body weight, waist circumference, abdominal circumference and hip circumference. Anthropometric measurements were taken up to the nearest 1.00 mm using standard techniques (29). Stature was measured to the nearest 0.10 cm with an anthropometer. The weight of the children was recorded bare feet to the nearest 0.50 kg with a portable weighing machine. All the circumferential measurements were measured with a constant tension tape to the nearest 0.1 cm. Mean and depression percentage for all the measurements considered was calculated and seen for their differences statistically with the help of student t-test.

Age estimation of all individuals was aided with reference to the important events and birth or school certificates. Technical errors of measurement were found to be within the reference limits (30).

Statistical Analysis

Data was analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Software, version 16 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics and students t-test were used, with a significance level set at 5%.

Results

The total sample of 1438 males from 3-70 years were divided into inbred (587) and outbred (851). Out of 993 boys, 549 were non inbred and 444 are inbred; and of the 445 adult men, 302 are non inbred and 143 are inbred (Table/Fig 2). The inbred were further subdivided into higher degree of inbreeding (F≥0.0625, 224 males) and lower degree of inbreeding (0.000 < F < 0.0625, 363 males).

The frequency of consanguineous mating among the people are presented in (Table/Fig 3). The highest frequency of consanguinity was 59.97% of second-cousins, followed by first-cousins which was 27.598%. The average coefficient of inbreeding in the present population was therefore found to be=0.01637931154.

Descriptive statistics of inbreeding on linear, circumferential and body weight measures: The descriptive statistics of the linear measurements, circumferential measurements and body weight of the boys at every age during childhood and adolescent phases are presented in [Table/Fig-4-10]. Further depression percentage was calculated at every age category among both the degrees of inbred.

Linear measurements: In all the linear measurements (Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6), there was a decrease in mean measurements among the inbred against the non inbred children from 3 years till 20 years. The variance in linear measurements among the children between the two levels of parental consanguinity showed insignificant level but the variance between the inbred and non inbred was statistically significant at the level of 5% in various age groups. The percentage decrease in stature among the higher degree inbred was highest at 14 years (5.83%) and was further higher in sitting height (7.89%) at 10 years and in lower extremity length, it was (9.42%) at 7 years.

Body weight: The body weight (Table/Fig 7) of the inbred boys was significantly heavier at the level of 5% and 1% than the non inbred at 3 years (p=0.0464), 7 years (p=0.0411), 10 years (p=0.0079), 13 years (p=0.0320), 15 years (p=0.0054), 18 years (p=0.0472) and 19 years (p=0.0372). A negative correlation exists between the levels of consanguinity and body weight at an insignificant level among the boys of the present study. The percentage depreciation between the two levels of inbreeding was however insignificant at all ages.

Circumferential measurements: The circumferential measurements (Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 10) also showed a depreciation among the inbred in all the measurements under study. The decrease in percentage was statistically insignificant between the two levels of inbred but statistically significant at 5% level between the inbred and non inbred. This decrease was highest in waist circumference at 7 years (3.996%), in abdominal circumference, it was 4.76% at 13 years and in hip circumference, it was 4.49% at 14 years. The depreciation in waist circumference between the inbred and non inbred was significant at 7 years (p=0.0165); in abdominal circumference, it was significant at 7 years (p=0.0103) and 13 years (p=0.0520); in hip circumference, it was at 7 years (p=0.0095), 10 years (p=0.0269) and 14 years (p=0.011).

Adults: Among the adults, the difference between the inbred and the non inbred for all the measurements are presented in cohorts of five years of age interval (Table/Fig 4),[(Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9),(Table/Fig 10). In every age cohort, all the measurements showed statistically insignificant difference between the inbred and non inbred at 5% level except in stature between 40-49 years and in waist and hip circumference between 25-29 years of age. The difference in all the body measurements between the two levels of inbred was statistically insignificant at all age cohorts.

Discussion

The mean coefficient of inbreeding estimates the risk of expression of recessive genes. The more biologically related the parents are, the greater the coefficient of inbreeding. The mean coefficient of inbreeding in the present population was higher (0.01637931154) than the inbreeding coefficient found in the entire North-Eastern states (Table/Fig 11) (15),(31),(32),(33),(34). This is a matter of concern for the population. The highest reported from any part of India could be seen in Aligarh as 0.0538 (Table/Fig 11). The table lays out status of the mean coefficient of inbreeding in the present population against some states of India and some countries outside India. Aligarh city shows the highest coefficient followed by the present population.

Rudan I et al., has estimated the population attributable risk as 23-48% of the incidence of the disorders showing an inbreeding effect. The global impact of inbreeding being one billion people globally show rates of consanguineous marriages greater than 20% (35). In health terms, parental consanguinity would be expected to influence the disease profile in India from a predominantly communicable to a non communicable disease (36).

In the study by Figueira BBD and Segre CAM, significant differences between the inbred and non inbred in weight, height, head, chest and mid-arm circumference have been reported in case of foetal growth, new born children, preschool and school children and the adolescents (37). In the present study, during the childhood and adolescent phase, an increase in the difference of mean values at a significant level (p<0.05) was found at many ages in the linear, circumferential and weight measurements with the increase in the inbreeding coefficient.

Height measurement is a widely used indicator of chronic growth retardation. The results in the present study suggest that inbreeding has a significant negative effect on stature, sitting height and lower extremity length. A significant association between consanguineous marriages and child stunting was also found when the results of propensity score matching also showed that child stunting was significantly higher in consanguineous marriages compared to non consanguineous marriage in India (1). Child stunting was found to be higher in the male child than female child under the age of five-years in India (38). If women in consanguineous union were not married to their blood relatives, the childhood stunting was found to decrease by 0.001 [0.1%] (21). Child stunting was also reported to be higher in rural areas among the poorest quintiles of those mothers who married their blood relatives (22).

A highly significant inverse association has also been found between height and genome-wide homozygosity which is equivalent to a height reduction of up to 3 cm in the offspring of first cousins compared with the offspring of unrelated individuals, an effect which remained after controlling for the effects of socio-economic status. In Libya, parental consanguinity was found to be a significant factor associated with stunting of the children in bivariate analysis (39). This disappeared in multivariate analysis indicating that it was a confounding variable.

A significant diminution between the inbred and non inbred in trunk length and leg length could be observed during childhood as well as adolescent phase of growth at many age categories in the present study. Leg length of infant (under 5 years) was found to be sensitive to socio-economic circumstances and diet, whilst trunk length was sensitive to serious illness and possibly to chronic emotional disturbance (40). The socio-economic circumstances in the present study therefore becomes important to be correlated with the inbreeding outcomes.

Previous literature conducted on consanguinity either lack socio-demographic variables, such as maternal age and birth intervals, mother’s education, economic conditions, or the nutritional status of mother and children has not been taken in to account (21),(22),(37),(39),(40). The need for comprehensive and more balanced investigations into all aspects of consanguineous marriage is required. The relationship may be specific for each studied population and highly dependent on the cultural context.

A significant diminution at many age groups is also found in the present study boys in their linear, circumferential and weight measurements. Diminutions in weight, height, chest girth, calf girth, head girth, head length (except head breadth) was also found in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh among the new born babies. But this decrease ceased to exist after a gap of 20 years, thus opining that the population has already undergone the process of inbreeding in the earlier generations (41). A slight inbreeding depression was also found in stature, sitting height, head length, head circumference, chest girth and calf girth among the Sheikh Sunni Muslim boys of old Delhi between the ages 11 and 16 years (42),(43). Greater inbreeding depression in adolescent period was also noticed rather than in earlier age groups in both the sexes (44).

Blood-relationship alone does not affect multifactorial traits, although anthropometric values were found to be slightly less among the children from first-cousin couples, but the differences were insignificant (45). A negative correlation exists between the levels of consanguinity and body weight at an insignificant level among the boys of the present study. Consanguinity was identified as a risk factor for underweight among the children in rural Sindh (46), among infants of Moroccan Jewish community in Jerusalem (47) and infants with low birth weight in Jordan (48). Children who were underweight were found to be 1.5 times more likely to have consanguineous parents than normal children (49). In South India, the measurements of weight, length, head circumference and triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness was found to be smaller among the uncle-niece groups than those of the first cousin group which further was smaller than the non consanguineous groups (50).

The circumferential measurements of waist circumference, abdominal circumference and hip circumference are also found to be affected in the present study. Significant depreciation between the inbred and non inbred at many ages are found. Depreciation found is whether because of malnutrition arising out of consanguinity needs to be studied. Consanguinity has been regarded as an infamous predictor of malnutrition, however, there are relatively fewer studies examining this relationship in the context of India. In the present study, it has been found that people from lower economic strata choose consanguinity to escape dowry payment during marriage by the bride’s family and meher (bride price) from the groom’s family. Therefore, correlating the metric traits with the economic variables is more important as this has a direct effect on their nutritional status.

The significant positive association between consanguinity and diminution of body measurements during the growing phases in the present study needs to be correlated with the other socio-demographic variables because the growing period is always more dependent on environmental variables (51).

The body parameters among the adult males did not show any statistically significant difference between the inbred and non inbred in all age categories. Stature is a classical and highly heritable complex trait which is influenced by both genetic and non-genetic factors, with 80%-90% of variation explained by genetic factors (52). The association between low childhood Socio-Economic Status (SES) and reduced adult stature is well established, with the likely mechanism being poor nutrition during childhood (53), although shared genetic factors cannot be excluded (54). In the present study, the genetic factors probably are the determining factor behind the similar body measurements (linear, circumferential and body weight) among the inbred and non inbred adults. Consanguinity has not affected their body parameters.

Among the major populations so far studied, the highest rates of consanguineous marriage have been associated with low socio-economic status, illiteracy, young age at marriage, low education of mother, low occupation of husband, and rural residence. All these factors are also associated directly with the nutritional intake of the people. Adequate nutrition is essential for proper growth and physical development from conception to adulthood to ensure optimal working capacity, normal reproductive performance and adequacy of immune mechanism which provides resistance to infections (55). So the influence of the environmental causes and effects on the depreciation in body measurements among the inbred boys in the present study needs to be corroborated by further research.

Limitation(s)

A comparative study between the sexes would have provided an insight into the effect of environmental variations arising out of any cultural factors. Since consanguinity is highly influenced by illiteracy, mother’s age at marriage, parental occupation, socio-economic conditions and place of residence (rural or urban), any form of inequality if maintained between the sexes will surely be reflected in their anthropometry. But the space constraint in research articles do not allow to cover every detail.

Conclusion

Significant positive association is found between consanguinity and diminution of body measurements in the growing phases. This needs to be correlated with other socio-demographic variables because the growing period is always more dependent on environmental factors. However, consanguinity did not affected any of the linear, circumferential or weight measurements among the adult males. Studies can be done in future to find any environmental causes behind the depreciation of the metric traits among the inbred during the growing period.

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank Indian Council of Social Science Research, New Delhi for the financial support given in the form of Major Research Project vide Sanction Order F.No.RP02/128/2017-18/RP/Major dtd.11.1.2019 to carry this work. All words are less to thank Karuna Gogoi (Research Assistant) whose unswerving help at all time helped in the completion of this project. The author would also like to thank all the villagers who showed immense interest in the study and helped in every possible way during the data collection.

References

1.
Mete Cem, Bossavie L, Giles J, Alderman H. Is consanguinity an impediment to child development outcomes? Discussion Paper Series. 2019; IZA Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn, Germany. [crossref]
2.
Hamamy H. Consanguineous marriages: Preconception consultation in primary healthcare settings. J Community Genet. 2012;3(3):185-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Bittles AH. Consanguinity, Genetic Drift, and Genetic Diseases in Populations with Reduced Numbers of Founders. In: Vogel and Motulsky’s Human Genetics: Problems and Approaches (eds.) M.R. Speicher, S. E. Antonarakis, A. G. Motulsky, 4th edition, 2010. 507 DOI 10. [crossref]
4.
Anwar WA, Khyatti M, Hemminki K. Consanguinity and genetic diseases in North Africa and immigrants to Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24 (Suppl. 1):57-63. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Bener A, Al Ali K. Consanguineous marriage in a newly developed country: The Qatari population. J Biosoc Sci. 2006;38(2):239-46. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Bener A, Ramzi R Mohammad. Global distribution of consanguinity and their impact on complex diseases: Genetic disorders from an endogamous population. Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics. 2017;18(4):315-20. [crossref]
7.
Bener A, Abdulrazzaq YM, Al-Gazali LI, Micallef R, Al-Khayat AI, Gaber T, et al. Consanguinity and associated socio-demographic factors in the United Arab Emirates. Hum. Hered. 1996;46(5):256-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Bittles AH, Black ML. Consanguinity, human evolution and complex diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(supplement 1):1779-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Bittles AH, Grant JC, Sullivan SG, Hussain R. Does inbreeding lead to decreased human fertility? Ann Hum Biol. 2002;29(2):111-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Hamamy H, Jamhawi L, Al-Darawsheh J, Ajlouni A. Consanguineous marriages in Jordan: why is the rate changing with time? Clin Genet. 2005;67(6):511-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Teebi AS, Teebi SA, Porter CJ, Cuticchia AJ. Arab genetic disease database (AGDDB): A population-specific clinical and mutation database. Hum Mutat. 2002;19(6):615-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Bittles A. The global prevalence of consanguinity. 2011. Available from: http:// www.consang.net.
13.
Tadmouri GO, Nair P, Obeid T, Al Ali MT, Al Khaja N, Hamamy HA, et al. Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reprod Health. 2009;6(17):17. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Bittles AH. When cousins marry: A review of consanguinity in the Middle East. In: Perspectives in Human Biology, Lincoln H Schmitt and Leonard Freedman (ed.), 1, The University of Western Australia. 1995:71-83. [crossref]
15.
IIPS and ICF. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015-16; 2017: International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.
16.
Mosayebi Z, Movahedian AH. Pattern of congenital malformation in consanguineous versus nonconsanguineous marriages in Kashan, Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2007;13(4):868-75.
17.
Schull WJ, Neel JVG. The Effects of Inbreeding on Japanese Children. 1965; New York: Harper and Row.
18.
Tayebi N, Yazdani K, Naghshin N. The prevalence of congenital malformations and its correlation with consanguineous marriages. Oman Med J. 2010;25(1):37-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Woods CG, Cox James, Springell K, Hampshire DJ, Mohamed MD, McKibbin M, et al. Quantification of homozygosity in consanguineous individuals with autosomal recessive disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;78(5):889-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Al-Idrissi I, Al-Kaff AS, Senft SH. Cumulative incidence of retinoblastoma in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Ophthalmic Paediatr Genet. 1992;13(1):09-12. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Rahi JS, Sripathi S, Gilbert CE, Foster A. Childhood blindness in India: Causes in 1318 blind school students in nine states. Eye.1995;9(Pt 5):545-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Vishwakarma D, Sharma SK, Puri P. Linkages between consanguineous marriages and childhood stunting: Evidence from a cross-sectional study in India. Children and Youth Services Review. 2021;122(C):01-07. [crossref]
23.
Barpeta Population-Current Population of India 2022. [Accessed on: 28th Sept., 2022] https://www.indiacensus.net/district/barpeta.
24.
Watson EH, Lowrey GH. Growth and Development of Children, Fourth Edition.1962; Year Book Medical Publishers. Inc.
25.
Wright S. Coefficient of inbreeding and relationship. The American Naturalist. 1922;56: 330-38. [crossref]
26.
Stern C. Principles of Human Genetics, Second Edition. 1960; W.H. Freeman and Company.
27.
Bittles AH. Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clin Genet. 2001;60(2):89-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Das BK. Inbreeding depression in anthropometric traits among Telega boys of Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. Coll Antropol. 2005;29(2):459-64.
29.
Weiner JS, Lourie JA. Practical human biology. 1981; London: Academic Press.
30.
Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA. Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr. 1999;82(3):165-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Khan SY. Consanguinity and inbreeding coefficient F in Aligarh City, India: A cross sectional study. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr. 2019;19: e4401. [crossref]
32.
Nawaz A, Zaman M, Malik S. Consanguinity, inbreeding coefficient, fertility and birth-outcome in population of Okara district, Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(3):770-75.[crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Abdulkareem AA, Ballal SG. Consanguineous Marriage in an urban area of Saudi Arabia: Rates and adverse health effects on the offspring. J Community Health. 1998;23(1):75-83. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Kars ME, Nazli BA¸ Onat OE, Bilguvar K, Choi J, Itan Y, et al. The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(36):01-10. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Rudan I, Rudan D, Campbell H, Carothers A, Wright A, Smolej-Narancic N, et al. Inbreeding and risk of late onset complex disease. J Med Genet. 2003;40:925-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Dandona L, Dandona R, Kumar GA, Shukla DK, Paul VK, Balakrishnan K and India State-level Disease Burden Initiative Collaborators. Nations within a nation: Variations in epidemiological transition across the states of India, 1990-2016 in the Global Burden of Disease Study. 2017;390:2437-60.
37.
Figueira BBD, Segre CAM. Mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in term newborns. Sao Paulo Med J. 2004;122(2):53-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Thurstan S, Opondo C, Seal A, Wells J, Khara T, Dolan C, et al. Boys are more likely to be undernourished than girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sex differences in undernutrition. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(12):e004030. Doi: 10.1136/ bmjgh-2020-004030. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
El Taguri A, Betilmal I, Mahmud SM, Ahmed AM, Goulet O, Galan P, et al . Risk factors for stunting among under-fives in Libya. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(8):1141-49. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Wadsworth ME, Hardy RJ, Paul AA, Marshall SF, Cole TJ. Leg and trunk length at 43 years in relation to childhood health, diet and family circumstances; Evidence from the 1946 national birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(2):383-90. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Paddaiah G, Madhavi D. The effect of parental consanguinity and inbreeding on the anthropometric measurements of the newborn babies revisited. Int J Hum Genet. 2001;1(3):187-90. [crossref]
42.
Krishan G. Effect of parental consanguinity on anthropometric measurements among the Sunni Muslim boys of Delhi. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986;70(1):69-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Mukherjee DP, Lakshmanudu M. Inbreeding depression in stature. In: DP Mukherjee (ed.) Human variations in India. Anthropological Survey of India, Calcutta. 1990:366-71.
44.
Das BK. Inbreeding depression in anthropometric traits among Telaga boys of Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. Coll Antropol. 2005;9(2):459-64.
45.
Bas¸ aran N, Artan S, Yaziciogllu S, S¸ ayli BS. Effects of consanguinity on anthropometric measurements of newborn infants. Clin Genet. 1994;45(4):208-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
46.
Hasnain SF, Hashmi SK. Consanguinity among the risk factors for underweight in children under five: A study from rural Sindh. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009;21(3):111-16.
47.
Fried K, Davies AM. Some effects of the offspring of uncle-niece marriages in the Morrocan Jewish community in Jerusalem. Am J Hum Genet. 1974;26(1):65-72.
48.
Obeidat BR, Khader YS, Amarin ZO, Kassawneh M, Al Omari M. Consanguinity and adverse pregnancy outcomes: The north of Jordan experience. Matern Child Health J. 2010;14(2):283-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
49.
Chauhan BG, Yadav D, Jungari S. Association between consanguineous marriage and child nutritional outcomes among currently married women in Pakistan. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;8(1):38-44. [crossref]
50.
Sibert JR, Jadhav M, Inbaraj SG. Fetal growth and parental consanguinity. Arch Dis Child. 1979;54(4):317-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Adair, LS, Guilkey DK. Age-specific determinants of stunting in Filipino children. J Nutr. 1997;127(2):314-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Cole TJ. The secular trend in human physical growth: A biological view. Econ Hum Biol. 2003;1(2):161-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
53.
Silventoinen K, Sammalisto S, Perola M, Boomsma DI, Cornes BK, Davis C, et al. Heritability of adult body height: A comparative study of twin cohorts in eight countries. Twin Research. 2003;6(5):399-08. [crossref] [PubMed]
54.
McQuillan R, Eklund N, Pirastu N, Kuningas M, McEvoy BP, Esko T, et al. Evidence of Inbreeding depression on human height. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(7):1002655. [crossref] [PubMed]
55.
Bender DA. Introduction to Nutrition and Metabolism. 2 nd ed. 1997; London: Taylor and Francis.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59254.17440

Date of Submission: Jul 22, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 22, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Oct 29, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 23, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 24, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 28, 2022 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com