Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 10107

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : LC24 - LC28 Full Version

Prevalence of Social Phobia and its Determinants among Undergraduate Medical Students of Tamil Nadu, India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58838.17481
Ramkumar Sundaram, Vijayalakshmi Srinivasan, Shagirunisha Rizvana Abdul Malik, Gokila Mahalingam, Hari Ram Thirunavukkarasu Saradham, Hari Ram Shanmugam Kalidossani, Hariharan Madhu

1. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Postgraduate, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Intern, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Intern, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 6. Intern, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India. 7. Intern, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Vijayalakshmi Srinivasan,
Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital, Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: vijilakshmi121@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Social Phobia (SP) is described as a persistent fear of one or more social performances. The sustained SP among medical students without prior identification raises susceptibility to substance abuse and poor quality of future life.

Aim: To estimate the prevalence of SP and determine the risk factors contributing to the development of SP among medical students in a tertiary teaching institute in Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 538 undergraduate medical students, in a tertiary teaching institute in Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India, from September 2021 to November 2021. Medical students, who were willing to participate, were included in the study. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic and personal characteristics and family variables. SP was measured by using Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) scale. Binary logistic regression was used to expose the definitive predictor factors. The statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0 software.

Results: A total of 538 students were included. The majority of students 339 (63%) were female and 199 (37%) were male. The mean (±SD) age of the participants was 21.27 (±1.73) years. The prevalence of SP among medical students was 41.1%. The predictor for SP was found to be rural residence Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR): 1.748 (95% CI: 1.184-2.582), female sex AOR: 2.002 (95% CI: 1.358-2.952), mothers’ illiteracy AOR: 3.640 (95% CI: 1.430-9.266), students experiencing humiliation (OR 2.3; 95% CI: 1.5-3.6), students with family conflicts (OR 2.4; 95% CI: 1.3-4.4), lack of relationship with parents (OR 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2-4.2). The mean score of the SPIN questionnaire was 19.05±13.05.

Conclusion: The prevalence of SP was high among medical students in Tamil Nadu. So, early detection and appropriate intervention need to be done by their institution among the students to enhance social interaction and improve academic performance.

Keywords

Humiliation, Quality of life, Risk factors, Social fear

The SP is described as a persistent fear of one or more social performances. SP is the second most common type of anxiety disorder and the third most common mental disorder following depression and alcohol use disorder [1,2]. There are two types of SP (i.e., generalised phobia and non generalised phobia) generalised phobia, where individuals fear most social situations but in non generalised phobia, individuals fear a limited range of situations (2).

An epidemiological study done by Kaye AD et al., reported that the lifetime prevalence of psychiatric and anxiety disorders among students ranges from 3-13% (3). One of the prerequisites for anxiety disorder is SP and its prevalence among medical students (7-13%) was low in western countries compared to middle and low-income countries (30-90%) (4). Similarly in India, several cross-sectional studies conducted even before the introduction of Competency Based Medical Education (CBME) revealed the higher prevalence of SP among medical students ranging from 12.6-60.9% (1),(2),(5),(6),(7),(8).

Current introduction of CBME and its demand for newer reforms in the medical curriculum to achieve the competencies by frequent formative assessment, and skills demonstrations were made mandatory for medical students which created havoc and made them prone for SP. So, the medical students with SP will further have difficulty in surviving the changes which are made by the National Medical commission (NMC) which in turn will reflect on their low performance. In CBME curriculum, most of the teaching learning methods like seminars, small group discussion, problem-based learning, Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) has direct observations or interactions with the teachers and peers which act as the precipitating circumstances for SP among the medical students (9).

Medical Student with SP are characterised by persistent excessive fear of scrutiny, embarrassment and humiliation in social performance, pervasive social timidity, social distress, avoidance of some individuals, and difficulty in basic social discourses (6). SP’s most common somatic symptoms include excessive sweating, slurred speeches, palpitation, blushing, tremor and nausea (6),(9). The sustained SP without prior identification raises susceptibility to substance abuse and poor quality in future lives. Medical students are confronted with various stressors and the need to become accustomed suitably to achieve academic and professional success elucidates the importance of having good mental health (10),(11).

The SP is one of the most prevalent anxiety disorders among adolescents and young, and that may hinder the individual’s performance if left untreated. Though different factors may increase the probability of having a social anxiety disorder among medical students, poor social support, a field of study and academic stress were the other contributing factors to social anxiety disorder (4).

Therefore, understanding the level of SP among medical students is crucial to revealing factors that can significantly influence a student’s mental health and prevent other related problems. Though, there are many studies on SP all over the world [9-18] but studies including medical students in Tamil Nadu, India are scarce, after the introduction of CBME. So, the current study was carried out after the introduction of CBME in medical curricula which has many precipitating factors for SP among medical students. So, the present study was conducted to find out the prevalence of SP and its determinants among medical undergraduate students of Tamil Nadu.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary medical institute in Perambalur, Tamil Nadu, India, from September to November 2021. Institution Human Ethics Committee approval ((IECHS/IRCHS no: 139 October 26, 2021-Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College Hospital) was obtained before the start of the study.

Inclusion criteria: Undergraduate Medical students of all the years, aged between 19-25 years and irrespective of gender, who were willing to participate were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Students already diagnosed to have any medical or psychiatry disorder were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated, considering prevalence of 60.9% as per the study done by Elavarasan K et al., (1). The sample size was estimated with a 95% confidence interval and 5% allowable error by using the formula n=Zα2PQ/d2 {zα=1.96, P=60.9, Q=39.1(100-60.9), d=5}. The calculated sample size was 366, with 40% non response rate it was 512 and the total sample collected for this study was 538.

Study Procedure

Participants were recruited by a simple random sampling method. The objective was assessed using a questionnaire made up via the Google forms and disseminated to the selected study participants via social media platforms (WhatsApp and Mail). A pretested semi-structured proforma was used to collect the participant’s socio-demographic and personal characteristics such as age (years), sex, year of study, height (cm), weight (kg), Body Mass Index (BMI) classified as per Asian BMI Classification (14) and medium of higher secondary education. Family characteristics such as family structure (occupation, education), lack of close relationship with a parent, order of birth, relationship conflicts, and parental history of mental disorder were elicited among medical students (11),(15).

The SP was measured by using 17 items Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) scale with cut-off points ≥21 (12). A 5-point Likert scale was used for scoring.

• Not at all=0
• A little bit=1
• Somewhat=2
• Very much=3
• Extremely=4

The SPIN score was used to categorise the SP as:

• none (0-20)
• mild (21-30)
• moderate (31-40)
• severe (41-50)
• very severe (51-68)

The minimum and maximum score were 0 and 68, respectively.

Statistical Analysis

The data collected was entered in Microsoft excel and analysed using SPSS version 26.0 software. The descriptive data were analysed using frequencies, mean, Standard Deviation (SD) and proportions. Binary logistic regression was used to expose the definitive predictor factors and odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval were used to assess the strength of associations between variables. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 538 students were included in this study. The majority of students 339 (63%) were female and 199 (37%) were male. The mean age of the participants was 21.27±1.73 years. Around 362 (67.3%) of students belonged to an urban area. In present study, 527 (98%) studied in English medium in their higher secondary education (Table/Fig 1). Out of 538 participants, 282 (52.4%) of the participants were first born and 19 (3.5%) reported a history of mental illnesses in the family. Around 54 (10%) reported the family conflict and 50 (9.3%) reported lack of relationship with their parents (Table/Fig 2).

In present study, the mean score of the SPIN questionnaire was 19.05±13.05. The overall prevalence of SP among medical students was 41.1%, in which medical students were classified as mild 115 (21.4%), moderate 73 (13.6%), severe 25 (4.6%) and very severe 08 (1.5%) (Table/Fig 3).

Nearly 114 (21.2%) participants reported experiencing teasing and 112 (20.8%) reported experiencing rejection and humiliation in last one year (Table/Fig 4).

Medical students from rural area were 1.7 (95% CI: 1.2-2.5) times more likely to exhibit SP than students from urban area with significant p-value (0.002). Similarly, Females (OR 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-2.8), students experiencing teasing (OR 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3-3.0), rejection (OR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-2.7), humiliation (OR 2.3; 95% CI: 1.5-3.6) were significantly more like exhibit SP (Table/Fig 5).

Students with family conflicts (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.4), lack of relationship with parents (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.2-4.2) and students whose mother is illiterate (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.5-9.2) were more likely to exhibit SP than other students with significant p-value (<0.05) (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

Changing societal needs and newer reforms in medical education coupled with SP were the major stressors among medical students which need to be identified early. In the present study, the prevalence of SP among medical students in Perambalur district, Tamil Nadu were 41.1% which classified as mild, moderate, severe, and very severe SPs were 21.4%, 13.6%, 4.6%, 1.5%, respectively.

Similar to the present study, conducted in Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Malaysia reported similar overall prevalence of SP among medical students ranges from 45% to 60% (1),(13),(16). Whereas the study conducted in Karnataka (30%) East Delhi (12.3%), Mangalore (25%), Kerala (14.3%), among medical students reported lower prevalence of SP [5,7,8,17] whereas study conducted in Iran and Saudi Arabia reported higher prevalence of SP (75%-92%) [10,13] (Table/Fig 7) [1,5,7-9,13,16,17,19]. This shows the socio-cultural contrast, academic pressure in medical colleges and nature of schooling has great impact on SP which results in medical student feeling more anxious during assessments, asking doubts during lectures and reduced self-confidence during exams, which eventually leads to bad academic performance.

In the present study, female medical students have higher risk of SP compared to male which was supported by the study conducted by, Afshari N et al.,; Zahra A and Alkhafji M; Jogdande AJ and Gupta A; Alkhalifah AK et al., (10),(11),(18),(19) whereas the study conducted by Dsouza MJ et al., reported no significant differences (5). In contrast to finding of present study, Mascarenhas JJ et al., reported that male medical students have higher prevalence of SP compared to female students (8).

Mother education plays a vital role in the prevalence of SP, in the present study medical students’ mother with low literacy rate have 3.7 times higher risk of developing SP, which was consistent with the study conducted by Jogdande AJ and Gupta A study conducted at Maharashtra (13). Likewise, students from rural area have higher risk of SP compared to urban students. The present study findings were consistence with the study conducted by, Mascarenhas JJ et al., Afshari N et al., and Desalegn GT et. al., (8),(10),(18). This shows that the medical students from rural area have lack of exposure to manage the difficult situations.

In present study, family history of mental illnesses was found to be 19 (3.5%), which is not statistically significant with SP, whereas study done by Zahra A and Alkhafji M found that students with SPs have a high positive family history of psychiatric disorders (11). In the current study, medical students whose parents were separated or deceased one/both parent 19 (3.5%) were not showing significant differences in SP compared to the students living with both the parents. In contrast to the present findings, a study done at King Khalid University, Saudi among 550 medical students found an increase in the prevalence of SPs for those who lost both parents and separated parents (20).

The other risk factors influencing the development of SPs among medical students found in the current study were the experiencing of teasing, rejection and humiliation in the last year and family conflict. This shows that embarassement in-front of other people leads to the occurrence of SP among medical students which in turn reduces their confidence.

Limitation(s)

As the study was done by subjective assessment considering few variables, in-depth understanding is needed to identify the stressors and it was done in current tertiary medical institute and the results were not generalisable to all teaching medical institute in Tamil Nadu, India.

Conclusion

The current study reported a higher prevalence of SP (41.1%) among medical students. The major risk factors found were female gender, students from a rural areas and their mother’s illiteracy, and students experiencing teasing, rejection, and humiliation in the last year. So, early identification and focusing on the mental health of the medical students is an obligatory need in the current CBME medical curriculum to achieve the competencies. The medical curriculum should be reframed to address the issues at early by creating knowledge and training all the medical students on communication skills through social interaction to alleviate SP.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank all present study participants for their full participation.

References

1.
Elavarasan K, Dhandapani T, Norman P, Vidya DC, Mani G. The association between internet addiction, social phobia and depression in medical college students. Int J Community Med Public Heal. 2018;5(10):4351-56. [crossref]
2.
Ratnani I, Vala A, Panchal B, Tiwari D, Karambelkar S, Sojitra M, et al. Association of social anxiety disorder with depression and quality of life among medical undergraduate students. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2017;6(2):243. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Kaye AD, Liu H, Fox C, Baluch A, Sutker PB. Psychiatric and behavioral disorders. Anesth Uncommon Dis. 2012;6:444-69. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/ B978-1-4377-2787-6.00015-2. [crossref]
4.
Stein DJ, Lim CCW, Roest AM, de Jonge P, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Al-Hamzawi A, et al. The cross-national epidemiology of social anxiety disorder: Data from the World Mental Health Survey Initiative. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):01-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
D’souza MJ, Arun Daniel J, Muhammed Muntazeem G. Social anxiety disorder among medical students in a tertiary care hospital in Davangere, Karnataka. Int J Community Med Public Heal. 2019;6(4):1434-36. [crossref]
6.
Jaiswal A, Manchanda S, Gautam V, Goel AD, Aneja J, Raghav PR. Burden of internet addiction, social anxiety and social phobia among University students, India. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020;9(7):3607. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Das P. Prevalence of social anxiety disorder and its determinants among undergraduate medical students of East Delhi. Int J Community Med Public Heal. 2019;6(3):1335. [crossref]
8.
Jovita Mascarenhas J, Krishna A, Pinto D, Professor A. Social Phobia (Social Anxiety Disorder) in Medical and Paramedical First Year Undergraduates. Galore Int J Heal Sci Res. 2019;4(2):120.
9.
Agha Mohammad Hasani P, Mokhtaree M, Asadollahi Z, Fereidoni M. The prevalence of social phobia among students of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, and its relation with personality traits in 2013. J Occup Heal Epidemiol. 2016;5(2):72-82. [crossref]
10.
Afshari N, Farokhzadian J, Abdi K, Sheikhbardsiri H. Gender matter, social phobia and high-risk behaviors in young medical students. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2021;31(2):359-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Zahra A, Alkhafji M. Social phobia among Al Qadissya medical student: Prevalence, academic performance and response to different treatments. J Fac Med Baghdad. 2012;54(1):33-37.
12.
Connor KM, Kobak KA, Churchill LE, Katzelnick D, Davidson JRT. Mini-SPIN: A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2001;14(2):137-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Jogdande AJ, Gupta A. Social anxiety disorder in medical students: Socio- demographic correlates. Int J Community Med Public Heal. 2017;4(9):3293-96. [crossref]
14.
Girdhar S, Sharma S, Chaudhary A, Bansal P, Satija M. An epidemiological study of overweight and obesity among women in an Urban area of North India. Indian J Community Med. 2016;41(2):154-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Olson CM. Familial factors in the development of social anxiety disorder. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2021;59(7):23-34. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Minhat HS, Alawad TA. Risks of mental problems among medical students in a public university in Malaysia. Malaysian J Med Heal Sci. 2019;15(SP3):65-69.
17.
Roshan S. Association of social anxiety disorder and self-esteem among young adults-a single centre study. Int J Curr Sci Res Rev. 2022;05(03):737-41. [crossref]
18.
Desalegn GT, Getinet W, Tadie G. The prevalence and correlates of social phobia among undergraduate health science students in Gondar, Gondar Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):438. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Alkhalifah AK, Alsalameh NS, Alhomaidhy MA, Alrwies NA. Prevalence of social phobia among medical students in Saudi Arabia. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2017;69(5):2412-16. [crossref]
20.
Abadi AM, Abdul M, Albaggar A, Aftab R, Mahmood SE. Prevalence of social phobia and its risk factors among students at King Khalid University, Abha city, Saudi Arabia. Int J Pharm Res. 2021;13(02):3471-77.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58838.17481

Date of Submission: Jul 02, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 31, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Oct 21, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 04, 2022
• Manual Googling: Sep 21, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 20, 2022 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com