Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 173363

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : OC01 - OC04 Full Version

Role of Aspergillus Specific IgG Titres as a Therapeutic Target for Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis: A Longitudinal Study


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59250.17385
Kshitij Agarwal, Gaurav Bhati, Prateek Gupta, Amit Kumar Verma

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. 2. Graded Specialist, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Military Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Kshitij Agarwal,
Assistant Professor, Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Dilshad Garden, Delhi-110095, India.
E-mail: ksh.agarwal@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CPA) continues to be an enigma to clinicians in regions with a high prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis and is often misdiagnosed as the latter, attributable to the significant overlap in symptoms and radiology. Moreover, although the diagnostic criteria for CPA have been standardised, the role of serological markers in monitoring disease activity and response to therapy is still not well characterised.

Aim: To understand the characteristics, risk factors and treatment outcomes in patients developing CPA and to determine the role of serological markers as indicators of disease activity.

Materials and Methods: The present longitudinal study was conducted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and its associated Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India from February 2021 to June 2022. Study included 46 patients suspected of harbouring CPA attributable to their clinico-radiological presentation. The diagnosis of CPA was made using the established criteria. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CPA received oral azole antifungals for six months and were monitored at three monthly intervals for reduction in baseline parameters to determine treatment success/failure. Paired and unpaired parametric variables were compared using the t-test and non parametric methods were compared using the Chi-square test.

Results: The diagnosis of CPA was established in 31 (67.4%) patients of whom 74.2% were males and the mean age was 47.3±2.2 years. These patients had been symptomatic for 5.8±1.2 years. Underlying risk factors (such as the history of tuberculosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, history of long-term glucocorticoid use etc.) had been present for 6.9±1.3 years. Patients harboured an average of two risk factors with tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus being the most common local and systemic affliction, respectively. Patients with tuberculosis (p-value=0.001) and chronic steroid use (p-value=0.029) were significantly at higher risk of developing CPA. Six months of azole therapy led to significant reduction in specific IgG titres (p-value=0.001), and serum precipitins (p-value=0.004). Two patients on itraconazole relapsed within 12 months but were successfully treated with voriconazole.

Conclusion: Tuberculosis was the most significant local risk factor leading to the development of CPA, which developed soon after diagnosis of another systemic risk factor. Six months of azole therapy was adequate to induce remission of the disease, activity of which can be monitored though the measurement of serum IgG antibody titres.

Keywords

Aspergillus fumigatus, Chronic necrotising, Immunoglobulin G antibody, Itraconazole, Pulmonary tuberculosis

Respiratory afflictions of Aspergillus species are now known to demonstrate as a wide spectrum ranging from asymptomatic colonisation to frankly invasive disease, the severity being a function of invasiveness of the mould vis-à-vis the immune status of the individual (1),(2),(3). While the risk factors for the invasive forms of aspergillosis are well established, those leading to the more chronic, semi-invasive forms are less well understood. Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CPA) is a chronic and progressive pathology of the lung resulting from a chronic subclinical inflammation and destruction of the lung parenchyma due to chronic colonisation and invasion of the latter by Aspergillus occurring in the setting of previously diseased lung tissue albeit with a ‘relatively’ robust immune response. A host of local pulmonary disorders have been implicated as risk factors for the same of which mycobacterial lung infections are most common followed by Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), pneumothorax, lung cancer, pneumonia and sarcoidosis to name a few (4).

Baseline differences in the geographical distribution of the underlying risk factors imply a varied global epidemiology of CPA as well. While some European studies document COPD to the most common risk factor for CPA (5),(6),(7). Others, particularly those from Asia implicate tuberculosis as the most prevalent risk factor, probably due to the commoner prevalence of the latter in this region (8),(9),(10),(11). Globally, African and Asian countries are estimated to be the hotbed for CPA developing secondary to tuberculosis. Given the fact that India is a high burden tuberculosis country and along with China comprises two-thirds of the global burden of tuberculosis, the same is hardly surprising; rather intriguing is why despite a high burden of tuberculosis, these two regions have such poor reporting of CPA when it is estimated that upto 6.4% of those treated for tuberculosis will eventually develop CPA (11). It is estimated that high-burden countries for tuberculosis such as India could account for nearly 290,147 cases over five years (12).

The discrepancy between estimates and reported figures may be ascribed to the non specificity of symptoms and radiological findings. It can be seen from the results that cough, dyspnoea and haemoptysis, the most common symptoms of CPA also happen to be the symptoms of tuberculosis. Moreover, cavitation and fibrosis are the most common radiological lesions as also is the case with tuberculosis. Therefore, it is likely that a vast majority of sputum negative tuberculosis patients from high burden countries are actually missed cases of CPA. Hence, there is need for active case detection and a high index of suspicion in patients with risk factors (11),(12).

The diagnosis of CPA is complex and one which relies on a multidisciplinary approach involving the pulmonologist, microbiologist, mycologist, immunologist and radiologist which is frequently not feasible in low-income areas (1).

The consensus with regards to management of the disease is to follow-up the progress of treatment and to perform a quantitative imaging procedure to assess radiological response (1). Demonstration of the presence of serological markers such as Aspergillus specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) titres hold a positive predictive value of 100% in favour of infection and is thus vital in the diagnosis of the disease, however, the role of IgG antibodies as prognostic markers is less clear notwithstanding their employment in previous studies for the same (1),(5). The present study was undertaken with the aim to understand the characteristics, risk factors, and treatment outcomes in patients who develop CPA and to determine the role of specific serological markers such as Aspergillus fumigatus specific IgG antibody titres in the follow-up of the disease.

Material and Methods

This longitudinal study was conducted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and its associated Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India, from February 2021 to June 2022. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (approval number IECHR-2021-51-7-R1]). Informed consent was obtained from all the patients before the enrolment.

Sample size calculation: It was done through the Cochrane formula. On an average, 45 patients are diagnosed with microbiologically negative pulmonary tuberculosis per quarter at the study institute.The required sample size for the present study to be recruited over a quarter, with 6% prevalence, 95% power, 0.05 significance level, and 5% error was calculated to be 30.

Inclusion criteria: Consecutive adult patients suspected of having CPA based on consistent risk factors (like tuberculosis, COPD, diabetes mellitus, history of long-term glucocorticoid use) and consistent radiological feature were enrolled and investigated for the possibility of the former as per the criteria proposed by Denning DW et al., and were included in the study (1).

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a more probable/confirmed alternative diagnosis or those with a critical presentation were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The patients underwent measurement of body weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), cell counts, liver and kidney function tests, measurement of serum precipitins and specific IgG antibodies against Aspergillus (A.) fumigatus, serum galactomannan, C-reactive Protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in addition to X-ray chest and Computed Tomography (CT) thorax.

Those diagnosed with CPA served as the study group while those who did not confirm to the criteria were investigated for alternative diagnoses. The former were administered therapy with antifungal agents after detailed counselling about drug alternatives, their adverse effects, chances of recurrence etc. and were followed-up every three months after the initiation of therapy which was continued for atleast for six months. Patients were administered either of the two triazole antifungals in the form of capsules namely Itraconazole (ITZ) and Voriconazole (VRC), the former was administered with cola or lime juice in a dose of 200 mg twice a day while the latter was administered in a dose of 200 mg twice a day following the first loading dose of double the maintenance dose. The above-mentioned parameters were repeated at every follow-up visit and were used to guide further therapy.

Monitoring and Follow-up

Patients diagnosed with CPA were classified into one of the subtypes namely Chronic Cavitating Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CCPA), Chronic Necrotising Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CNPA) or Subacute Invasive Aspergillosis (SAIA), Chronic Fibrosing Pulmonary Aspergillosis (CFPA), aspergillus nodule or simple aspergilloma as per previously used definitions (1). Patients were administered the antifungal agent as described above for atleast six months. Treatment outcome was defined as successful, if follow-up was associated with:

• Abatement of presenting symptoms,
• Radiological improvement,
• Normalisation of CRP or ESR levels,
• Reduction of IgG against A. fumigatus titres to the baseline (calculated from a pooled serum sample taken from healthy controls).

While failure was defined if any of the above were not achieved.

In case of the latter, patients were reassessed for the reasons of treatment failure and were shifted to a higher antifungal regimen; ITZ was to be replaced with VRC while VRC was to be replaced with amphotericin B. Patients treated successfully were followed-up six monthly with the above-mentioned investigations for one year to identify any relapse of CPA which was identified by:

(1) Recurrence of symptoms
(2) New radiological shadows consistent with CPA
(3) Improbability of other diagnoses
(4) IgG against A. fumigatus titres double from the last known value
(5) Elevation of CRP or ESR with or without isolation of fungi from the sputum sample or demonstration of galactomannan in serum.

Patients who stayed asymptomatic at the end of the study were discharged from regular hospital visits and advised to follow-up as needed.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 16.0 (SPSS Inc. Released 2007. SPSS for Windows, Chicago, IL, USA). Paired and unpaired parametric variables were compared using the t-test, non parametric methods were compared using the Chi-square test. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient Characteristics

A total of 46 patients were enrolled as CPA suspects in the study of which CPA was diagnosed in 31 (67.4%) patients. (Table/Fig 1) demonstrates the patient flow and clinical characterisation. Clinical characteristics of the study population are presented in (Table/Fig 2) which shows that the mean age of the study group was 47.3±2.2 years (range: 21-70 years), 23 (74.2%) were males, 16 (51.6%) were smokers with an average smoking history of 36.6 pack years while 5 (16.1%) were habitual of alcohol. Patients had been symptomatic for 5.8±1.2 years with the most common symptoms being cough (n=22, 70.9%), dyspnoea (n=21, 67.7%) and haemoptysis (n=17, 54.8%). The right and left lungs were affected with nearly equal frequency, however, by the time the disease was diagnosed, 70.9% had bilateral lung involvement and more than 77% cases had more than one diseased lobe. Cavitation (n=27, 87.1%), aspergilloma (n=20, 64.5%) and parenchymal fibrosis (n=16, 51.6%) were the most frequent tomographic findings.

In general, risk factors were present since 6.9±1.3 years. Although the local pulmonary pathology had been present for 9.4±6.9 years, the disease developed soon (1.4±0.6 years) after a systemic risk factor was diagnosed. On an average, 2.12 risk factors were present per patient. As shown in (Table/Fig 3), tuberculosis was the most common local pathology, present in 25 patients while diabetes mellitus, the most common systemic association, was seen in five patients; infrequent associations included solitary cases of bronchiectasis and Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema (CPFE) respectively. Amongst all the risk factors, tuberculosis (p-value=0.001) and chronic steroid use (p-value=0.029) were the most significantly associated with the development of CPA.

At baseline, the mean weight was 48.6±1.8 kg and haemoglobin was 11.4±0.3 g/dL while the specific IgG and galactomannan titres were noted to be 57.6±5.6 MgA/dL and 0.55±0.15, respectively. Moreover, CRP was raised in 29 (93.5%), ESR in 16 (51.6%) and serum precipitating antibodies were demonstrated in 23 (74.2%). With regards to the aetiologic agent, fungus was isolated in 19 (61.3%) cases with A. fumigatus being identified in 16 (84%) of these cases. Additionally, A. flavus was isolated from 2 (10.5%) cases and an unidentified aspergillus species was isolated from a solitary case.

Among 31 CPA patients, 13 were classified as CNPA, 12 CCPA, three CFPA, two simple aspergilloma and one aspergillus nodule. 22 (70.9%) patients with CNPA, CCPA, CFPA and aspergillus nodule received ITZ, 7 (22.6%) received VRC while two patients with simple aspergilloma were followed-up every three months for clinicoradiological worsening, and positivity of CRP and doubling of specific IgG titres in order to identify development of CPA; they continued to be asymptomatic till 1 year. (Table/Fig 4) presents the effects of six months of specific antifungal therapy on the primary outcome variables. Both drugs exerted significant and comparable improvements in weight, BMI, Total Leucocyte Count (TLC), peripheral blood neutrophilia and lymphocytosis and blood urea. Also, significant reduction was noted in specific IgG titres and positivity of serum precipitins. Moreover, the secondary outcome variables namely number of patients to relapse and survival after treatment, showed that two patients, each with CCPA and CNPA previously treated on ITZ relapsed within 12 months but were successfully treated with VRC; while another patient, the solitary case of aspergillus nodule developed fatal invasive aspergillosis at three months into therapy and died. Another patient successfully treated with ITZ for CCPA succumbed to fatal haemoptysis due to an uncertain aetiology one year after being declared cured. Therefore, six months of treatment with antifungal triazoles was deemed satisfactory in 90% (26 of 29 patients) that received azole antifungals casesof CPA. No adverse effects serious enough to discontinue therapy were reported with either drug.

Discussion

The present study aimed to identify the risk factors underlying the development of CPA and to determine the role of specific serological markers such as Aspergillus fumigatus specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody titres in the follow-up of the disease. Pulmonary tuberculosis was noted to be the most common underlying pathology in nearly 80% of the study population while diabetes mellitus with its prevalence in 12% patients was the most prevalent systemic condition. Moreover, while the local risk factors had been present for nearly a decade before the disease manifested, systemic associations such as diabetes mellitus and chronic steroid seemed to hasten the development of disease, with CPA manifesting in about one year from the time the latter were diagnosed. Structural lung damage as seen after tuberculosis, has previously been shown to be a risk factor for fungal infections probably by overriding the local defence mechanisms of the lung (13),(14). Systemic immunosuppression as well is considered a risk factor for CPA but given the present study it would be interesting to investigate if development of systemic immunosuppressive conditions hastens the disease process.

C-reactive protein served as an important marker of disease activity, being elevated in more than 90% study population of the present study which is consistent with previously reported studies (7),(11). In fact raised CRP titres have been shown to be associated with an adverse outcome in CPA (11).

An interesting aspect of this study was measurement of A. fumigatus-specific IgG titres as a guide to therapy which, in contrast to the above-mentioned markers is a more direct, specific and quantifiable marker of disease activity. Although this measure has been previously used to judge disease activity after cessation of therapy, the same is restricted to individual studies and the criteria used have varied (1),(8),(15). Most studies as well as guidelines rely on clinicoradiological improvement as the end point of treatment. However, the same could be subjective and non specific. Specific IgG measurement provides an objective and disease specific outcome parameter. In this study, specific IgG measurements were performed every three months till six months for which patients received therapy. During this period, the specific IgG titres nearly halved (reduction of 45%) from the mean pretreatment value of 57.8-31.5 MgA/L at the end of treatment. Thus, six months of therapy were found adequate in achieving reduction in specific IgG titres. Moreover, serial monitoring for the next 10 months indicated a relapse before significant radiological lesions developed, indicating therefore, that specific IgG titres is an important minimally-invasive objective marker of disease activity.

Limitation(s)

Assessment of outcomes dependent of the CPA subtype was not done. Also, no head-to-head comparison between the efficacy of voriconazole and itraconazole was done and antifungal susceptibility profiles of the isolated strains of Aspergillus species were not taken into account while determining therapy or declaring an ongoing treatment as a failure due to antifungal resistance. More systematic studies are needed to determine if the same therapeutic regimens suffice in all the disease subtypes and patients alike.

Conclusion

Given a milieu of systemic immunosuppression, chronic pulmonary aspergillosis is not an uncommon development for diseases such as tuberculosis that induce structural lung damage. Moreover, 6 months of azole therapy is adequate to induce remission of the disease and is associated with favourable changes in non specific markers of disease activity such as body weight and peripheral leucocyte counts and a significant reduction of Aspergillus fumigatusspecific serum IgG antibody titres. Therefore, serial measurement of Aspergillus fumigatus-specific serum IgG antibody titres, which is commonly available and relatively inexpensive, can be employed as a specific serological marker to monitor the activity of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.

References

1.
Denning DW, Cadranel J, Beigelman-Aubry C, Ader F, Chakrabarti A, Blot S, et al. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: Rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(1):45-68. Doi: 10.1183/1399 3003.00583-2015. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Patterson KC, Strek ME. Diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary aspergillosis syndromes. Chest. 2014;146(5):1358-68. Doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0917. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Kosmidis C, Denning DW. The clinical spectrum of pulmonary aspergillosis. Thorax. 2015;70(3):270-77. Doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206291. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Smith NL, Denning DW. Underlying conditions in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis including simple aspergilloma. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(4):865-72. Doi: 10.1183/ 09031936.00054810. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Felton TW, Baxter C, Moore CB, Roberts SA, Hope WW, Denning DW, et al. Efficacy and safety of posaconazole for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(12):1383-91. Doi: 10.1086/657306. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Cadranel J, Philippe B, Hennequin C, Bergeron A, Bergot E, Bourdin A, et al. Voriconazole for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: A prospective multicenter trial. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:3231-39. Doi: 10.1007/s10096-012- 1690-y. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Camara B, Reymond E, Saint-Raymond C, Roth H, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Pinel C, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: A retrospective analysis of a tertiary hospital registry. Clin Respir J. 2015;9(1):65- 73. Doi: 10.1111/crj.12105. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Agarwal R, Vishwanath G, Aggarwal AN, Garg M, Gupta D, Chakrabarti A, et al. Itraconazole in chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis: A randomised controlled trial and systematic review of literature. Mycoses. 2013;56(5):559-70. Doi: 10.1111/ myc.12075. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Jhun BW, Jeon K, Eom JS, Lee JH, Suh GY, Kwon OJ, et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Med Mycol. 2013;51(8):811-17. Doi: 10.3109/13693786.2013.806826. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Nakamoto K, Takayanagi N, Kanauchi T, Ishiguro T, Yanagisawa T, Sugita Y, et al. Prognostic factors in 194 patients with chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis. Intern Med. 2013;52(7):727-34. Doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.52.9142. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Denning DW, Pleuvry A, Cole DC. Global burden of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis as a sequel to pulmonary tuberculosis. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(12):864-72. Doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.089441. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Agarwal R, Denning DW, Chakrabarti A. Estimation of the burden of chronic and allergic pulmonary Aspergillosis in India. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):01-10. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114745. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Bansod S, Rai M. Emerging of mycotic infection in patients infected with mycobacterium tuberculosis. World J Med Sci. 2008;3(2):74-80.
14.
Godet C, Philippe B, Laurent F, Cadranel J. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: An update on diagnosis and treatment. Respiration. 2014;88(2):162-74. Doi: 10.1159/ 000362674. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Guo Y, Bai Y, Yang C, Gu L. Evaluation of Aspergillus IgG, IgM antibody for diagnosing in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: A prospective study from a single center in China. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(16):e15021. Doi: 10.1097/MD.00 00000000015021.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59250.17385

Date of Submission: Jul 26, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 18, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Oct 01, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 30, 2022
• Manual Googling: Sep 19, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Sep 28, 2022 (5%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com