Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 162765

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : QC14 - QC17 Full Version

Colour Doppler and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Pregnancies with Foetal Growth Restriction: A Prospective Longitudinal Study


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/58611.17520
Shelly Khillan, Sarbhjit Kaur

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India. 2. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India.

Correspondence Address :
Shelly Khillan,
#7, Raja Avenue, Near 21 No. Phatak, Patiala, Punjab, India.
E-mail: rosetaylorindia@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Foetal Growth Restriction (FGR) accounts for a significant proportion of perinatal morbidity and mortality. The study was done to diagnose the foetuses “at risk”, so that timely intervention could prevent perinatal morbidity and mortality, as FGR foetuses with deranged velocimetry of Uterine Artery (UA), Umbilical Artery (UMA), Middle Cerebral Arteries (MCA) are associated with high perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of blood flow velocimetry of UA, UMA, and MCA as well as a Cerebroplacental Ratio (CPR) on colour doppler and their prediction of adverse perinatal outcome.

Materials and Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal study done in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India from October 2021 to March 2022. The study was conducted among 200 antenatal patients, who had a singleton pregnancy, irrespective of age and parity and had FGR foetuses. Blood flow velocities in the UA, UMA, MCA, and CPR were measured. Patients were divided into four groups with 50 patients in each group. Group I included FGR foetuses with normal blood velocities, group II included FGR foetuses with abnormal UA velocimetry, group III included FGR foetuses with abnormal UMA and MCA velocimetry and group IV included FGR foetuses with abnormal CPR. Adverse perinatal outcomes in the form of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), prematurity, Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration (APGAR) <7 at 5 minutes, admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), and perinatal mortality were assessed in relation to these doppler blood flow patterns. Categorical variables were analysed with the help of Chi-square test and Fisher-exact test. Continuous variables were analysed with ANOVA when data were normally distributed otherwise Kruskal Wallis H test was used.

Results: The mean birth weight was 2432±423, 2209±329, 2100±223 and 1329±403 grams in groups I, II, III, and IV (p-value of <0.001.) The mean gestational age was 38.1±2.3, 37.3±3.2, 36±3.6 and 33.1±3.1 weeks in groups I, II, III, and IV (p-value of <0.001). Perinatal morbidity in the form of RDS and prematurity were compared among four groups with 0, 3 (6%), 17 (34%), and 39 (78%) in groups I, II, III, and IV (p-value of <0.001). APGAR score <7 at 5 minutes was 0, 2 (4%), 9 (18%), and 13 (26%) in groups 1, II, III, and IV (p-value of <0.001). A total of 6 (12%), 16 (32%), 37 (74%) and 46 (92%) C-sections were performed in group I, II, III and IV, respectively, p-value of <0.001. Maternal mortality of 1 (2%) in group III and 2 (4%) was observed in group IV. But no maternal death was there in group I and II.

Conclusion: The adverse perinatal outcomes were seen with changes in Pulsatility Index (PI) value of UA, UMA, MCA. But the patients with a deranged CPR ratio had got worse perinatal outcomes than either deranged MCA, PI or UMA PI alone. Hence, doppler ultrasound especially CPR ratio should be an integral component of routine evaluation of FGR pregnancies, as it helps in obstetrical surveillance and management, and thereby improving adverse perinatal outcomes.

Keywords

Cerebroplacental ratio, Middle cerebral artery, Umbilical artery

Foetal Growth Restriction is defined as a foetus with an estimated foetal weight below the 10th percentile for gestational age (I). Despite recent advances in antenatal care, FGR remains the major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality, so, the screening of FGR may allow vigilant antenatal surveillance and appropriate timing of foetal delivery in order to avoid serious sequelae (1).

Doppler techniques have been the focus of interest and research activity in obstetrics since, the initial report of signals from the UMA by Fitzgerald DE and Drumm JE (2). The compromised blood flow through uterine, placental and foetal vessels results in FGR (3). The abnormalities of blood flow in these vessels can be measured by colour doppler Ultrasonography (USG) (4). There is a decrease in blood flow of uterine, placental and foetal vessels in growth restricted foetus. During early pregnancy extra villous cytotrophoblasts invade the uterus and spiral arteries transforming them into large vessels of low resistance. Failure of trophoblast invasion and spiral artery transformation occurs in FGR (5), which results in abnormal blood flow in various blood vessels of uterus, foetus and placenta. The doppler assessment of these vessels helped in screening of FGR foetuses. The colour doppler studies tells about presence or the absence of blood flow, direction of blood flow, velocity profile, flow volume and impedance. The UMA and MCA are easily accessible and reproducible. MCA of foetuses is helpful in evaluating the foetal hypoxia (6). The blood flow in the umibilical artery depends on the vascular changes in foetal placental circulation. As the pregnancy, advances the number of tertiary stem villi increases so, resistance in the UMA decreases, resulting in increased blood flow. There is a progressive increase in the blood flow during diastole in UMA. This increased blood flow pattern starts appearing from 15 weeks of gestation (7). This blood flow increases as, there is an increase in gestational age. The normal UMA blood flow shows low resistance and there is gradual increase in blood flow during diastole (8). Three abnormal UMA waveform patterns were described: decrease in diastolic flow, absence of diastolic flow, and reversal of diastolic flow. These parameters result in increased UMA-PI. The foetuses with absent diastolic flow and reverse end diastolic flow have very poor prognosis. These foetuses require very close monitoring as sudden foetal demise can occur in these patients (9). There is a redistribution of foetal blood in chronic foetal hypoxia to heart, kidney and brain. The blood flow to MCA increases so, there is decrease in PI of MCA. This increase in circulation is known as brain sparing effect and these results in CPR ratio less than 1. But, if hypoxia continues the blood flow of MCA returns to normal level, MCAPI level returns to normal level (10). This does not show foetal well-being but continuous acidosis or brain oedema hampers the brain sparing effect (11). The abnormal velocimetry of UA and presence of diastolic notch is associated with reduced birth weight and increase incidence of abruption placenta (12). Prediction of FGR is valuable for earlier prevention and chance for better outcomes and treatment (13).

The objective of the study was to show the usefulness of colour doppler flow of UA, UMA and MCA as well as CPR and their association with adverse perinatal outcome.

Material and Methods

This was a prospective longitudinal study done in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala, Punjab, India from October 2021 to March 2022. The ethical committee clearance was obtained from the Ethical Committee of Government Medical College and Hospital (No. Trg.9 (310)2022/38219).

Inclusion criteria: A total of 200 patients with singleton FGR foetuses were included in the study. FGR foetus was defined as foetus with an estimated foetal weight less than the 10th percentile for gestational age by prenatal ultrasound (1).

Exclusion criteria: The patients with multiple pregnancies, foetus with congenital malformations, rhesus immunisation were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Calculation was done by using the formula.

n=z2×p^(1-p^)/ ε2

where, Z was the critical value of the Normal distribution (e.g., for a confidence level of 95%, ‘α’ was 0.05 and the critical value was 1.96), ‘ε’ was the margin of error, ‘p’ was the sample proportion. Confidence Interval=95%, p=9.5% (14), MOE=5%, So ‘n’ came out to be=195.92 so n=196 (1.96)2×0.15×(1-0.15)/ (0.05)2. To reduce the margin of error total sample size was taken as 200. The 200 patients were divided into four groups with 50 patients in each group:

Group I: (50 patients) FGR, foetus with normal blood velocimetry.
Group II: (50 Patients) FGR foetus with abnormal UA velocimetry.
Group III: (50 Patients) FGR foetus with abnormal UMA and MCA velocimetry.
Group IV: (50 Patients) FGR foetus with abnormal CPR ratio.

Study Procedure

After selection, all patients had undergone colour doppler USG. Gestational age was estimated on the basis of the last menstrual 15period and by the earliest scan that patients had. The different foetal parameters and Amniotic Fluid Index (AFI) were recorded. Foetal weight was estimated by the Hadlock FB et al., (15) three parameter formula based on the combination of head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length.

Pulsed wave doppler was used to obtain flow velocity wave forms from ascending branch of UA at the point closest to its origin from internal iliac artery. The mean PI of left and right UA was calculated. PI value was considered abnormal if it was above 95th percentile for gestational age or presence of diastolic notch (7). Doppler measurements of UMA were taken from a free floating loop of the umbilical cord near the abdominal insertion site. Care was taken to ensure the loop of cord was not compressed between uterine wall and the foetus. UMA PI of 0.87±0.16 was considered normal and values above that were considered abnormal (13). Doppler measurements of MCA were taken overlying the anterior wing of the sphenoid bone near the base of the skull close to origin of MCA from internal carotid artery. MCA PI of 1.61±0.15 was considered normal and values below that were considered abnormal (11).

All Doppler wave forms were recorded when there was no breathing movement of foetus and uterus was relaxed. The UMA and MCA PI were recorded. CPR was calculated by dividing the doppler indices of the MCA by those of UMA. CPR equal to or less than one was considered abnormal while CPR more than one was considered normal (6). The decision on the mode of delivery was based on foetal compromise, foetal maturity, conditions of cervix. Birth weight, gestational age, mode of delivery (C-section, normal vaginal delivery), length of hospital stay were assessed. Five minutes APGAR score below 7, neonatal health including perinatal morbidity in the form of RDS, prematurity, admission to NICU, and neonatal deaths were assessed.

Statistical Analysis

The analysis of categorical variables was done by Chi-square test and Fisher-exact test. The analysis of continuous variables was done by ANOVA when data were normally distributed otherwise Kruskal Wallis H test was used. The data was analysed using SPSS version 22 and Microsoft excel. A p-value of ≤0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results

The patients in all four groups were mostly primigravida patients (Table/Fig 1). The mean gestational age at delivery was highest in group I (38.1±2.3 weeks) and lowest in group IV (33.1±3.1 weeks), showing patients in group IV needed delivery at early gestational age due to the severity of colour doppler changes. In group I no foetus had perinatal morbidity as compared to the 78% in group IV (Table/Fig 2).

Patients with FGR foetuses were affected with PIH in all four groups, with the highest (54%) in group IV. Two (4%) maternal mortality was observed in group IV due to severe preeclampsia, and in group III one (2%) maternal death was due to disseminated intracoagulopathy due to abruption placenta (Table/Fig 3).

Discussion

The FGR is a pathological condition strongly related to the development and function of uteroplacental and foetoplacental circulations. Adequate foetal circulation is necessary for normal foetal growth. To facilitate this, remarkable changes occur in the maternal, placental, and foetal vasculatures.

In the present study, it was found that group IV patients with deranged CPR value were delivered at an earliest mean gestational age of 33.1±3.1 weeks among four groups. This was in accordance with the study done by Efraim Z et al., in which the mean gestational age was 32.1±2.1 weeks in patients with deranged CPR suggesting that these FGR foetuses required delivery at an early gestational age (11). The mean birth weight of foetuses in group IV was lowest, 1329±403 gm among the four groups. This was in accordance with a study done by Benitez-Marin M et al., which showed that the foetuses with deranged CPR were having low mean birth weight (10). In group IV patients the babies with APGAR <7 at 5 minutes were highest, 13 (26%). The NICU admission of group IV babies were highest, 34 (68%) among the four groups. This was in accordance to a study done by Benitez Marin M et al., who showed more babies had APGAR <7 at 5 minutes and admissions to NICU with deranged CPR values (10). Perinatal mortality was highest in group IV, 5 (10%) in the study. This was in accordance with a study done by Ute F et al., who found that the foetuses with deranged CPR values had 8% mortality (16). Group IV patients with deranged CPR value had the highest 27 (54%) incidence of PIH. It was in accordance with a study done by Zhu YC et al., which suggested that the association of PIH with deranged CPR was very high (12). group IV patients were associated with 17 (34%) cases of oligohydramnios. This was in accordance to a study done by Efraim Z et al., which showed oligohydramnios was associated with 31% of cases of deranged CPR (11). Abruption placenta was highest in group IV, 5 (10%) in this study. All the patients with abruption placenta were associated with PIH. This was in accordance with a study done by Zhu YC et al., which showed 8% of patients with FGR foetuses with deranged CPR developed abruption placenta (12). Group IV patients required maximum number of C-sections in 46 (92%) cases. The high incidence of C-section was in accordance with the study done by Khalil AA et al., who also showed a C-section rate of 84% in patients with CPR less than one (17).

Maternal mortality was highest in group IV, 2 (4%). The two deaths in group IV were due to severe preeclampsia. This was in accordance with a study done by Zhu YC et al., which showed 3% maternal mortality in patients with FGR with deranged CPR (12). The patients had severe preeclampsia leading to Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC), and abruption placenta.

Colour doppler study of foetal vessels is a simple, quick, non invasive procedure and multiple vessel study has high accuracy for antepartum foetal surveillance. If there is abnormal PI of UMA and MCA, CPR ratio should be performed to know the extent of brain sparing.

Limitation(s)

The study was limited to short-term intrapartum events and perinatal outcomes.

Conclusion

The adverse perinatal outcomes were seen with changes in the PI value of UA, UMA, MCA. But the CPR ratio which takes into consideration of both MCAPI and UMAPI when deranged is associated with more perinatal adverse effects than either MCAPI or UMAPI alone. There is no change in CPR value in advance gestational age and abnormal CPR is more commonly associated with adversed foetal outcome. Hence, doppler ultrasound especially CPR ratio should be an integral component of routine evaluation of FGR pregnancies as it helps in foetal monitoring and management and thereby improving adverse perinatal outcome.

References

1.
Gordijin SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: A Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):333-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Fitzgerald DE, Drumm JE. Non invasive measurement of the foetal circulation using ultrasound: A new method. Br Med J. 1977;2:1450-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Mc Callum WD, Olson RF, Daigle RE, Baker DW. Real time analysis of doppler signals obtained from the feto-placental circulation. Ultrasound Med. 1977;3B:1361-64.
4.
Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Fetal and umbilical doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:Cd007529. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Medley N. Fetal and umbilical doppler ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:Cd001450. [crossref]
6.
Vollgraff Heidweiller Schreurs A, De Boer M, Heymans M, Schoonmade LJ, Bossuyt P, Mol B. Prognostic accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio and middle cerebral artery doppler for adverse perinatal outcome: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:313-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Philip B, Kurian S. Assessment of foetal compromise by doppler ultrasound investigation of the foetal circulation. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2017;4:4364-67. [crossref]
8.
Singh S, Verma U, Shrivastava K, Khanduri S, Goel N, Zahra F. Role of colour doppler in diagnosis of intra uterine growth restriction. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;2:566-72. [crossref]
9.
Vogel JP, Vannevel V, Robbers G. Prevalence of abnormal umbilical arterial flow on doppler ultrasound. Reprod Health. 2021;18(38):978-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Benitez Marin M, Marin Clavijo J, Blanco Elana J. Brain sparing effect on neuro development in children with intrauterine growth restriction. Children. 2021;8(9):745.[crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Efraim Z, Eyal Z, Mark R, Ahmad A. Third trimester reference ranges for cerebroplacental ratio and pulsatility index for middle cerebral artery and umbilical artery. Ramban Maimonides Med J. 2019;10(4):25-27.
12.
Zhu YC, Lin L, Li BY, Li XT, Chen DJ, Zhao XL, et al. Incident and clinical features of fetal growth restriction in women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Maternal Fetal Medicine. 2020;15(4):207-10. [crossref]
13.
Gyanwali M, Sharma P, Lalchan S, Tiwari PK. Predication of neonatal outcome by umbilical artery velocimetry in intra uterine growth restriction: A study in western Nepal. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2015;3:139-43.
14.
Lemi B, Roba A, Garumma T. Perinatal outcome of growth restricted fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery doppler waveforms compared to growth restricted fetuses with normal umbilical artery doppler waveforms at a tertiary referral hospital in urban Ethopia. Journal Plos One. 2020;15(6):1371. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Hadlock FB, Deter RL, Harrist RB, Park SK. Estimating fetal age. Computer assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters Radiology. 1984;152:497-501. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Ute F, Tsakane H, Robert P, Valerie V. Identifying the high risk fetus in the low risk mother using fetal doppler screening. Glob Health Science Pract. 2022;10(3):962-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Khalil AA, Morals Rosello J, Morlando M, Hannan H, Bhide A, Pakageorghioa A, et al. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:541-50.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/58611.17520

Date of Submission: Jun 22, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 18, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 30, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 20, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 09, 2023 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com