Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 167105

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : QC18 - QC23 Full Version

Evaluation of Serum Soluble Endoglin Levels in Pre-eclampsia: A Case-Control Study


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/57711.17538
Yuganti C Sawarkar, Rachna Agarwal, Mohit Mehndiratta, Amita Suneja, Richa Aggarwal

1. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India. 2. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India. 4. Director Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.

Correspondence Address :
Yuganti C Sawarkar,
Postgraduate Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UCMS and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
E-mail: ycsawarkar@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Soluble Endoglin (sEng) has an antiangiogenic effect, by inhibiting of Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β1 bond at endoglin receptors and inhibiting vasodilatation. sEng levels increase in Pre-eclampsia (PE) due to hypoxic placenta and there have been possible role of it in the pathogenesis of PE and its therapeutic implications.

Aim: To compare serum sEng levels in pre-eclamptic patients (cases) versus control.

Materials and Methods: This case-control study was carried out November 2019 to October 2021, in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi. On 40 cases with a singleton pregnancy with diagnosis of PE enrolled as cases and 40 normal healthy pregnant women matched for age and gestational age as controls. sEng was estimated using commercially available Enzyme- Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit. Last uterine (Ut) and Umbilical Artery (UA) doppler findings were noted and sEng levels were compared with doppler studies. The analysis was done using student t-test and Chi-square test.

Results: A total of 80 participants were included in the study, 40 in case group (mean age 26.53±4.93 years) and 40 in control group (mean age: 25.35±3.10 years). A total of 21 PE cases were Non Severe PE (NSPE) (52.5%) and 19 were Severe PE (SPE) (47.5%). Early-onset PE was observed in n=11 (28%) and the remaining n=29 (72%) had late-onset PE. sEng was significantly higher in pre-eclamptic women 55.08±21.42 ng/mL as compared to controls 44.15±12.02 ng/mL (p=0.006). Higher levels of sEng were seen in SPE 59.20±28.44 ng/mL vs NSPE 51.36±11.66 ng/mL (p=0.066). sEng levels between early onset PE (50.93±5.89 ng/mL) and late onset PE (56.66±24.84 ng/mL) (p=0.832). sEng levels were higher in cases with abnormal Resistance Index (RI) of Ut artery 54.23±6.68 ng/mL than in normal RI of Ut artery 54.23±6.68 ng/mL, though not significant. Abnormal Ut artery RI doppler was seen more in early-onset (n=2, 33%) than in late onset PE (n=1, 7%).

Conclusion: The PE cases had significantly higher levels of sEng compared to controls. Thus, it can be concluded that, there is a definitive role of sEng in pathogenesis of PE due to its antiangiogenic action.

Keywords

Doppler, Early-onset pre-eclampsia, Pulsatility index, Resistance index, Serum soluble endoglin

Despite the uncertain aetiology of PE, it has been seen that angiogenesis defect in the early stages of pregnancy, results in incomplete remodelling of uterine spiral arterioles, abnormal placental vascular development, and endothelial dysfunction as the main cause of PE (1),(2),(3). sEng has an antiangiogenic effect, thereby interfering with the Tumour Growth Factor (TGF)-β1 bond at endoglin receptors on the cell surface, it will inhibit endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) activation and thereby inhibit vasodilation. It may also cause maternal vascular endothelial dysfunction, and induce endotheliosis (4). sEng, therefore, is known as an endothelial dysfunction marker (4). Thus, the role of sEng with other antiangiogenic factors remains a topic of interest. sEng has therapeutic implications, as there has been treatment available that targets and decreases sEng (5),(6),(7),(8),(9). There is a paucity of literature on sEng levels in PE in the Indian population (10). Hence, the present study was conducted with the aim to evaluate serum sEng levels in PE cases and compare them with control. Comparison of its levels between non severe and severe pre-eclampsia, early-onset and late-onset PE cases were also done. Its levels were also compared with normal and abnormal RI of uterine artery and Pulsatility Index (PI) of umbilical artery doppler velocimetry.

Material and Methods

This was a case-control study, conducted between November 2019 to October 2021 in Delhi, in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in collaboration with the Department of Biochemistry, University College of Medical sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi. Ethical clearance was obtained from Institutional Ethical Committee for human research (IEC-HR/2019/41/80).

Sample size calculation: In a study conducted by Nabiel Y and Mosbah A (11), the sEng in PE and control were 25.76±3.9 and 14.98±2.39 pg/mL, respectively (11). In order to detect this difference at a error=5% and power of study=80%, a sample size of 15 cases was required in each group. As per sample size calculation, n=40 cases and n=40 controls were enrolled in the study, of which 40 were women with singleton pregnancy with diagnosis of PE, for termination of pregnancy (dates confirmed by first trimester scan/sure of dates) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled as cases and all normal healthy pregnant women matched for age and gestational age were taken as controls.

Inclusion criteria: Those patients diagnosed with PE according to the definition of the ACOG task force on hypertension in pregnancy (12) presenting at the chosen study centre during the study time period were included in the study.

According to task force, (12):

1) PE is defined as the presence of Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) greater than or equal to 140 mmHg or a Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) greater than or equal to 90 mmHg or higher, after 20 weeks of gestation on two occasions, at least four hours apart in a previously normotensive patient or an SBP greater than or equal to 160 mmHg or a DBP greater than or equal to 110 mmHg or higher.
2) In addition to blood pressure criteria, proteinuria of greater than or equal to 0.3 grams in a 24-hour urine specimen, a protein (mg/dL)/creatinine (mg/dL) ratio of 0.3 or higher or a urine dipstick protein of 2+ (if a quantitative measurement is unavailable) is required to diagnose PE.
3) In absence of proteinuria, new onset hypertension with thrombocytopenia (Platelet count <1,00,000/μL), renal insufficiency (serum creatinine concentration >1.1 mg/dL or doubling of serum concentration in absence of other renal disease), impaired liver function (elevated blood concentration of liver transaminase to twice the normal concentration), presence of pulmonary oedema or presence of cerebral or visual symptoms are the criteria required for diagnosis.

Exclusion criteria: For case group participants, pregnancy with diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, chronic renal failure, premature rupture of the membranes, polyhydramnios, collagen vascular disease, foetal anomalies, asthma, acute respiratory tract infection, smoking were excluded. All normal normotensive women with normal pregnancy age (±2years) and gestational age matched were included as control subjects.

Study Procedure

All subjects were classified into non severe and Severe PE (SPE) on the basis of the following (detailed in (Table/Fig 1)) (13).

Early onset PE was defined as the onset of hypertension before 34 weeks and late onset PE as after 34 weeks (7). Blood samples were taken at the time of delivery or induction of labour. A detailed history, general physical examination, and cardiovascular, respiratory and obstetrics examination of all the subjects were performed. All subject’s last ultrasound findings were noted and doppler velocimetry was done. Uterine and umbilical artery doppler velocimetry finding was noted and classified as normal or abnormal based on the following parameter

• Umbilical artery doppler velocimetry was defined as abnormal if either the PI was above the 95th percentile for gestational age using or in the presence of abnormal waveforms (absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities).
• Uterine artery doppler velocimetry was defined as abnormal if either the mean RI was above the 95th percentile for gestational age or in the presence of a bilateral early diastolic notch (14).

Determination of serum sEng levels: The serum levels of sEng in women with PE and normotensive pregnant women were measured using sEng Enzyme Linked Immuno-sorbent Assay (ELISA) kit following manufacturer’s instructions. The kit was based on the principle of sandwich ELISA:

• Standard curve was constructed by plotting the absorbance obtained from each standard against its concentration with absorbance value on the vertical (Y) axis and concentration on the horizontal (X) axis;
• The corresponding concentration values from the absorbance value of the samples were calculated using a linear curve;
• Serum sEng was thus measured in ng/mL.

Statistical Analysis

Shapiro Wilk test has been used to check normality. Categorical variables were presented in number and percentage (%) and continuous variables were presented as mean±SD and median. Statistical analysis was done as quantitative variables were compared using an independent t-test. Qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find cut-off points of sEng levels for predicting cases and SPE in cases. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0.

Results

The women in the study group were homogenously distributed in both groups with reference to age, socio-economic status (based on modified kuppuswamy scale) (15), and religion. The socio-economic status of Class III (lower-middle) was seen in majority of cases (58%) and controls (50%) (Table/Fig 2).

Mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was significantly higher in cases 22.29±2.76 kg/m2 than in control 21.2±2.06 kg/m2 (p<0.05). Out of 40 cases of PE, n=21 cases were NSPE and n=19 were SPE. Out of 19 SPE, there were n=6 cases of Haemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, and Low Platelets (HELLP) (32% of SPE) and out of which n=2 cases were partial HELLP with thrombocytopenia alone and the rest had complete HELLP (2 or more features). Out of 11 cases of early-onset PE, n=6 (55%) developed SPE vs n=5 (45%) who developed NSPE. While in late onset PE out of 29 cases, n=13 (45%) had progressed to SPE.

The most common maternal complication in the present study was pulmonary oedema n=9 (47%) (Table/Fig 3). Out of 10 Foetal Growth Retardation (FGR) cases, FGR was higher in severe cases (n=7, 37%) vs NSPE (n=3, 14%). Also, deranged doppler with FGR were more in severe cases (n=4, 21%) than NSPE cases (n=3, 14%).

Majority (n=28, 70%) of women in pre-eclamptic group underwent induction of labour (iatrogenic) as compared to the controls (n=33, 83%) who went into labour spontaneously. Caesarean section rates were higher in pre-eclamptic cases (n=14, 35%) compared to controls (n=2, 5%) (p-value=0.003). Preterm delivery rates were higher in SPE (n=8, 42%) cases than NSPE cases (n=7, 33%). The mean neonatal birth weight among the pre-eclamptic cases 2.19±0.46 kg was significantly lower than control 2.65±0.44 kg (p<0.001). Thus, rate of NICU admission was higher in SPE (47%, n=9) than NSPE (10%, n=2). Out of the nine NICU admissions, two neonatal mortalities occurred due to prematurity and sepsis belonged to SPE group. There was no maternal mortality.

Mean value of sEng was significantly higher in pre-eclamptic women 55.08±21.42 ng/mL as compared to controls 44.15±12.02 ng/mL in Indian population (p=0.006) as shown in (Table/Fig 4).

Higher levels of sEng were seen in SPE (59.20±28.44 ng/mL) compared to NSPE (51.36±11.66 ng/mL), though not significant (p-0.066) (Table/Fig 5).

No significant difference (p=0.832) was seen in the mean value of sEng levels between early onset PE (50.93±5.89) and late onset PE (56.66±24.84) (Table/Fig 6). sEng levels (54.23±6.68 ng/mL) were higher in cases of abnormal RI of uterine artery than in normal RI of uterine artery (52.01±22.16 ng/mL) though not significant (p=0.865). When mean value of sEng was compared in pre-eclamptic with normal PI of umbilical artery (52.62±22.32 ng/mL) and abnormal PI of umbilical artery (48.25±9.47 ng/mL) no significant difference was found (Table/Fig 7). Abnormal uterine artery RI doppler was seen more in early-onset (n=2, 33%) than in late onset PE (n=1, 7%). However, abnormal umbilical artery PI doppler was seen more in late-onset PE (n=3, 21%) than in early-onset PE (n=1, 17%).

The authors plotted two curves for predicting PE cases and SPE cases. (Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9) shows sEng levels for predicting SPE cases had Area Under Curve (AUC) (0.829) whereas (Table/Fig 10) shows sEng levels for predicting PE cases had AUC (0.795). On plotting Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, the cut-off for predicting PE cases was 47.94 ng/mL with sensitivity of 67.50%, specificity of 75%, positive predictive value 72.97% and negative predictive value 69.77% and AUC of 0.795. The cut-off for predicting SPE cases were 46.5 ng/mL with sensitivity 84.21% n specificity 67.50%, positive predictive value 55.17% and negative predictive value 90%.

Discussion

The defective vascular remodelling and a hypoperfused placenta, resulting from the shallow cytotrophoblast migration toward the uterine spiral arterioles. The placenta becomes ischaemic which leads to the release of angiogenic factors that are associated with maternal vascular endothelial dysfunction. sEng is one such antiangiogenic factor (17). sEng is a cell surface co-receptor that binds to and decreases levels of TGF-b, which induces migration and proliferation of endothelial cells (18). sEng has an antiangiogenic effect, which is by interfering the TGF-1 bond at Eng receptors on the cell surface, it will inhibit endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) activation and result in no vasodilation. It may also cause maternal vascular endothelial dysfunction (19),(20). These aspects mediate downstream effects, that create endothelial dysfunction, a vasoconstrictive state, oxidative stress, and microemboli, which contribute to the involvement of multiple organ systems, and thus, the clinical features of PE (18).

Rana S et al., studied plasma concentration of sEng and found it significantly higher in women with PE (30.2 ng/mL) and gestational hypertension (6.2 ng/mL) compared to women with no hypertensive disorder (4.8 ng/mL) (21). They used a cut-off of 12 ng/mL for sEng. The authors also observed that sEng were significantly higher in pre-eclamptic group 55.08±21.42 ng/mL compared to controls 44.15±12.02 ng/mL (p=0.006). The cut-off for predicting pre-eclamptic cases in the present study is 47.94 ng/mL. Nikuei P et al., studied that the mean serum level of sEng in women with mild PE was 24.08±3.05 ng/mL and SPE was 26.34±3.37 ng/mL as compared to controls 13.58±5.80 ng/mL (22). They also found there was a significant increase in early onset (26.10±2.68 ng/mL) compared to late onset PE (24.62±3.47 ng/mL). However, in our group the mean value of sEng in late onset PE (56.66±24.84 ng/mL) was higher than early onset PE (50.93±5.89 ng/mL) as there were fewer cases in early onset PE compared to late onset PE our data is limited. Nabiel Y and Mosbah A studied maternal sEng level and cell free foetal Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) in PE (11). Similar results were found, the means in pre-eclamptic cases is significantly higher than in the control group. Also, the authors in the present study observed that the mean levels of sEng were higher in SPE compared to NSPE though not significant. Hence, the authors can imply that there is correlation between increasing levels of sEng and severity of PE.

Gaber K et al., studied sEng levels in gestational hypertensives, pre-eclamptic and controls during 14-18 weeks of gestation and followed till delivery (23). They found that the level of sEng was significantly higher in PE and gestational hypertension in comparison to control group. However, the results of these studies cannot be compared to the present study as our enrollment of cases was after onset of PE. A detailed review of literature shows increased level of sEng in PE, summarised in (Table/Fig 11) (11),(14),(21),(22),(24).

sEng levels and its correlation with Doppler studies: literature has shown abnormal umbilical and uterine doppler having higher sEng levels compared to those with normal doppler flow [14,24]. The authors also studied the correlation of sEng with normal and abnormal RI of uterine artery and PI of umbilical artery detailed in (Table/Fig 3). The present study was in coherence with study of Chaiworapongsa T et al., and Tobinaga CM et al., (14),(24). Chaiworapongsa T et al., observed that abnormal UT and UA doppler velocimetry had highest sEng levels compared to other groups (14). In the present study, due to limited resources, the authors were able to conduct doppler in only 20 cases and controls. However, in the present study, no significant difference was found in relation between sEng and abnormal PI of umbilical artery (p=0.703). Tobinaga CM et al., found patients with early-onset PE had higher mean uterine artery doppler than late-onset (24). Similarly, in the present study, the authors found that abnormal uterine artery doppler was seen more in early-onset (33%) than in late onset PE (7%). However, abnormal umbilical artery doppler was seen more in late-onset PE (21%) than in early-onset PE (17%). As doppler studies were done only in limited cases and controls, more number would be needed for further research. The strength of this study was that this was a case-control study model in a previously uninvestigated population from the Indian subcontinent. The study had a prospective study design and all the subjects were matched for age and gestational age. All pre-eclamptic cases i.e., non severe and severe, early- and late-onset PE were included in the present study and compared. The cases group was also compared with control group for sEng levels. The present study focused on a well-defined PE group excluding gestational hypertension and chronic hypertension cases to decrease ambiguity of pregnancy related hypertensive case definition. Present study also compared PE complications with sEng levels. The authors also included RI of uterine artery and PI of umbilical artery in the present study to learn more about the pathogenesis of sEng in PE.

Limitation(s)

Gestational and chronic hypertension cases were not included in the present study. The result of only one hospital cannot be generalised for all settings. Doppler study was done on a limited number of cases and controls due to COVID-19 pandemic resources were limited. Enrollment of cases was done at induction of labour and not from early gestation to help to predict pre-eclampsia.

Conclusion

The PE cases had higher levels of sEng compared to controls and SPE had higher levels of sEng compared to NSPE though not significant. Higher levels were associated with severe manifestations. Abnormal RI uterine artery doppler associated with higher levels of sEng, though not significant. Also, abnormal uterine artery doppler was seen more in early-onset than in late-onset PE. Thus, it can be concluded that there is a definitive role of sEng in pathogenesis of PE due to its antiangiogenic action.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Dr. Rachna Agarwal for all her guidance and mentorship.

References

1.
Kar M. Role of biomarkers in early detection of preeclampsia. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(4):BE01-BE04. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Wang Y, Wang Q, Guo C, Wang S, Wang X, An L, et al. Association between CRP gene polymorphisms and the risk of preeclampsia in Han Chinese women. Genet test Mol Bio. 2014;18(11):775-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Wolf M, Hubel CA, Lam C, Sampson M, Ecker JL, Ness RB, et al. Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular disease: Potential role of altered angiogenesis and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(12):6239-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Akbar MA, Herdiyantini M, Aditiawarman A. Comparison of serum soluble endoglin level in early onset preeclampsia, late onset preeclampsia and normal pregnant woman. Majalah Obstetri Ginekologi. 2017;25:10-15. Doi: 10.20473/mog.V25I12017.10-15. [crossref]
5.
Brownfoot FC, Hastie R, Hannan NJ, Cannon P, Tuohey L, Parry LJ, et al. Metformin as a prevention and treatment for preeclampsia: Effects on soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and soluble endoglin secretion and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(3):356.e1-15. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Saleh L, Samantar R, Garrelds IM, van den Meiracker AH, Visser W, Danser AHJ. Low soluble FMs-like tyrosine kinase-1, endoglin, and endothelin-1 levels in women with confirmed or suspected preeclampsia using proton pump inhibitors. Hypertension. 2017;70(3):594-600. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Hannan NJ, Brownfoot FC, Cannon P, Deo M, Beard S, Nguyen TV, et al. Resveratrol inhibits release of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase (sFlt-1) and soluble endoglin and improves vascular dysfunction-implications as a preeclampsia treatment. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1819. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Onda K, Tong S, Beard S, Binder N, Muto M, Senadheera SN, et al. Proton pump inhibitors decrease soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and soluble endoglin secretion, decrease hypertension, and rescue endothelial dysfunction. Hypertension. 2017;69(3):457-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Brownfoot F, Hastie R, Hannan N, Cannon P, Nguyen V, Tuohey L, et al. Combining metformin and sulfasalazine additively reduces the secretion of antiangiogenic factors from the placenta: Implications for the treatment of preeclampsia. Placenta. 2020;95:78-83. Doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 25. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Sachan R, Patel ML, Dhiman S, Gupta P, Sachan P, Shyam R. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of serum soluble endoglin levels in preeclampsia and eclampsia. Adv Biomed Res. 2016;5:119. Doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.186993. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Nabiel Y, Mosbah A. Maternal serum endoglin and cell-free fetal DNA as probable markers of preeclampsia: A study in single center, Egypt. Immunol Invest. 2019;48(6):608-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(5):1122-31.
13.
Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. Pregnancy Hypertension. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM et al., eds. Williams Obstetrics, 24th ed. Philadelphia: McGraw Hill; 2015:728-79.
14.
Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, Mittal P, Kim SK, Gotsch F, et al. Plasma soluble endoglin concentration in preeclampsia is associated with an increased impedance to flow in the maternal and fetal circulations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35(2):155-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Mohd Saleem S. Modified Kuppuswamy socio-economic scale updated for the year 2019. Indian J Forensic Community Med [Internet]. 2019;6(1):01-03. [crossref]
16.
Raymond D, Peterson E. A critical review of early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2011;66(8):497-506. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Amaral LM, Wallace K, Owens M, LaMarca B. Pathophysiology and current clinical management of preeclampsia. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017;19(8):61. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Ives CW, Sinkey R, Rajapreyar I, Tita ATN, Oparil S. Preeclampsia-pathophysiology and clinical presentations: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(14):1690-702. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Whitman M, Raftery L. TGF beta signaling at the summit. Development. 2005;132(19):4205-10.[crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Yelumalai S, Subramanian K, Omar SZ, Qvist R, Muniandy S. Angiogenic factors in the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of Preeclampsia: A mini review. Biomed Res. 2010;21(3):246-51.
21.
Rana S, Cerdeira AS, Wenger J, Salahuddin S, Lim KH, Ralston SJ, et al. Plasma concentrations of soluble endoglin versus standard evaluation in patients with suspected preeclampsia. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48259. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Nikuei P, Rajaei M, Malekzadeh K, Nejatizadeh A, Mohseni F, AtashAbParvar A. Accuracy of soluble endoglin for diagnosis of preeclampsia and its severity. Iran Biomed J. 2017;21(5):312-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Gaber K, Hamdy E, Hanafy A. Soluble Endoglin as a new marker for prediction of preeclampsia in early pregnancy. Middle East Fertil Soci J. 2010;15:42-46. Doi:10.1016/j.mefs.2010.03.009. [crossref]
24.
Tobinaga CM, Torloni MR, Gueuvoghlanian-Silva BY, Pendeloski KPT, Akita PA, Sass N, et al. Angiogenic factors and uterine Doppler velocimetry in early- and late-onset preeclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(5):469-76.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/57711.17538

Date of Submission: May 11, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jul 07, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 01, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 14, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 25, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 31, 2022 (25%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com