Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 153390

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : QR01 - QR04 Full Version

Unusual Presentation of Peripartum Cardiomyopathy-A Case Series


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60800.17451
Ramadoss Kabilan Vidhyalakshmi, Saswati Tripathy, Anuradha Murugesan, N Sajeetha Kumari, Preethika Ananda

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SRM Medical College and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SRM Medical College and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SRM Medical College and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SRM Medical College and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centre for Clinical Trials and Research, SRM Medical College and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Saswati Tripathy,
Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SRM Medical College and Research Centre, Chengalpattu-603211, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drsaswati78@gmail.com

Abstract

A rare condition called Peripartum Cardiomyopathy (PPCM) causes a pregnant woman’s heart to weaken and expand. It occurs in the last month of pregnancy or within five months of delivery. The presented paper was a series of three cases (29-year-old women, 26-year-old women, 26-year-old women) with unusual presentations of PPCM. Cases 1 and 2 demonstrated unique PPCM presentations that included abrupt cardiogenic shock and failure symptoms and signs. The postpartum period’s typical PPCM appearance is illustrated by case 3. The index patients (cases 1 and 2) had low systemic blood pressures, acute respiratory distress, and reduced cardiac output that was indicative of cardiogenic shock. An early echocardiogram was ordered as a result, and the results were suggestive of heart failure. Their varying clinical manifestations posed a significant diagnostic problem due to the heterogeneity. Even though they are uncommon, such catastrophic presentations including acute respiratory distress and low-output cardiac failure can happen. In these unusual cases, rapid pharmacological and mechanical support is required. In order to provide patients with the finest and most efficient care possible, it is crucial to understand the aetiology, clinical signs and symptoms, management, and prognosis of PPCM. Thus, physicians need to be familiar with different presentations of PPCM and always consider it with a high index of suspicion to expedite treatment for a potentially lethal condition to get a better outcome.

Keywords

Cardiac failure, Myocardiopathy, Pregnancy, Respiratory distress

The PPCM is a rare, but life-threatening form of heart failure affecting women in the last month of pregnancy or the first five months postpartum without any previously recognisable heart disease. It is a kind of non ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy related to pregnancy and diagnosis of exclusion following a concurrent evaluation of peripartum heart failure (1).

Because of the variety in their clinical manifestations, PPCM poses a significant diagnostic difficulty. This article also discusses the origin, clinical signs and symptoms, management, and prognosis of unusual presentation of PPCM in three patients, all of which are important to comprehend to give patients the best and most effective care possible.

Case Report

Case 1

A 29-year-old women, G2P1L1, reported to the labour room at 37 weeks days of gestation with chief complaints of pain in the lower abdomen since one day, increasing in frequency. Previous LSCS was at term with no co-morbidities and uneventful past and present antenatal history, with no personal and family history of the cardiovascular disease. On examination she was found to be in early labour with doubtful scar integrity.

Emergency LSCS was done under spinal anaesthesia and the patient had atonic Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH) immediately after surgery which was managed medically. Blood and blood products including 2 units packed cells and 1 unit FFP were transfused. During immediate postoperative period, in the recovery room, the patient developed abdominal discomfort and drowsiness with a pulse rate of 130/min (low volume), systolic BP of 60 mm Hg, and abdominal distension. Subsequently, the patient was intubated and resuscitative measures were taken. The patient was then shifted to ICU for elective postoperative ventilation and haemodynamic monitoring.

The patient again developed a second episode of hypotension with bradycardia after an hour, and was started on inotropic support. Echo showed ejection fraction of 55%, mildly dilated left atrium, normal left ventricular function, and tachycardia. Blood investigations were sent and cardiac markers were found to be raised (Table/Fig 1).

On postoperative day 1, a repeat echo was done, which showed an ejection fraction of 20%, biventricular dysfunction, and global hypokinesia suggestive of cardiomyopathy (Table/Fig 2).

The patient was then treated with T.Digoxin 0.25 mg/day, 2 doses of Inj.Amiodarone 250 mg infusion, T.Nattokinase 2000 f.u/day, T.Ecospirin 150 mg/day, T.Ivabradine 5 mg/day, T.Trimetazidine MR 35 mg/day, Inj.Unfractionated heparin 5000 IU/day, Inj.lasix 20 mg/day, dopamine receptor agonist bromocriptine 2.5 mg/day, inotropic support with Noradrenaline DS infusion @10 mL/hour, and ventilatory support. Bacterial growth in the blood culture was present (checked on 6th postoperative day) (Initially, the patient was on Inj.Piperacillin-tazobactam and Metronidazole) and higher-order antibiotics, including Inj.Meropenem 2 gm/day in 2 divided doses, Inj.Clindamycin 1800 mg/day in three divided doses were started to combat the septicaemia, which the patient acquired during the due course of her stay at the ICU. The patient developed multiple ailments like gluteal bed sore, gangrene left thumb, and critical care polyradiculopathy in due course of her stay which was managed by involving a dedicated multidisciplinary specialty team.

The patient continued to be on ventilatory support for one month, and was finally weaned from oxygen support after a month. She was also under intense physiotherapy and rehabilitation training for critical care neuropathy. Serial ECHO studies were done and the ejection fraction started improving from the second week of illness and she was finally discharged on postoperative day 52. A six-month follow-up exam revealed a stable heart condition and routine echocardiography with a 65% ejection fraction (Table/Fig 3).

Case 2

A 26-year-old women G2P1L1, reported to labour room with chief complaints of continuous high-grade fever for the past one day and was admitted in view of acute febrile illness. Previous LSCS was at 36 weeks of gestation. She was known to have subclinical hypothyroidism and was taking 75 mcg thyroxine, and oral iron therapy. She had an anterior wall fibroid which was diagnosed incidentally during a routine antenatal scan.

After admission, she got labour pains and was taken up for emergency repeat LSCS under spinal anaesthesia in view of doubtful scar integrity. It was a transverse lie with dorso inferior and the baby was delivered by breech. A sessile 7×5×4 cm subserosal fibroid was present at the upper flap of the uterine incision near the right angle necessitating myomectomy for the uterine incision closure. Uterine atonicity was noted and attempted medical management, but suddenly the patient developed hypotension and desaturation. Hence, she was intubated, converted to general anaesthesia, 2and proceeded to surgical management including step-wise devascularisation and B-Lynch compression sutures.

The patient was then shifted to ICU postoperatively for haemodynamic stabilisation. In the ICU, she again had the second episode of hypotension needing inotropic and ventilatory support with no evidence of vaginal or intraperitoneal bleeding. A Cardiologist’s opinion was sought and bedside ECHO showed global hypokinesia, moderate to severe LV dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 30% (Table/Fig 4). Trop T was positive with elevated CK MB (45 IU/L) and CK total (170 IU/L) enzymes suggestive of PPCM.

The patient was then started on antifailure drugs, Bromocriptine 2.5 mg/day, Digoxin 0.25 mg/day, and Nattokinase 2000 f.u/day. Ventilatory and inotropic support was continued. On the first two postoperative days, the patient was found to have deranged LFT, RFT, and coagulation profile, blood products were transfused accordingly (Table/Fig 5).

Later from the 3rd postoperative day, the patient gradually improved clinically and by ECHO findings. She was extubated and completely taken-off from inotropic support on postoperative day 6. Serial ECHO studies were done and ejection fraction improved to 50% and discharged on postoperative day 12. Follow-up examination at three and six months showed a stable cardiac status and normal echocardiogram with ejection fraction of 60%.

bCase 3

A 26-year-old women primigravida at 38 weeks of gestation reported to the labour room in early labour, progressed spontaneously. She was a known case of gestational diabetes mellitus, under medical nutrition therapy. She was delivered by emergency caesarean section under general anaesthesia for foetal distress. The patient had major atonic PPH, managed with Intramuscular Inj.Methergine 0.2 mg, Intramuscular Inj.Prostodin 250 mcg, Oxytocin 15 IU infusion, Rectal misoprostol 800 mcg, and surgically by bilateral uterine artery ligation and Hayman compression sutures. Blood and blood products were transfused. She was then shifted to ICU for postoperative ventilation and monitoring. The echocardiogram showed a normal ejection fraction of 62% and the patient was extubated the next day.

The patient then developed skin necrosis over the wound site for which wound debridement and secondary suturing was done on 5th day of surgery. She then had a normal recovery and was discharged on the 11th day of surgery.

On the 16th day of surgery, the patient then presented with breathlessness at rest, sweating, and shoulder pain to the emergency department. On examination, there was tachycardia and tachypnea with normal blood pressure and oxygen saturation. ECG showed sinus tachycardia and echocardiogram showed global hypokinesia of the left ventricle, moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction with an ejection fraction of 43%, dilated left ventricle, grade 2 mitral regurgitation, and grade 3 diastolic dysfunction. She was then treated with T. Digoxin 0.25 mg/day, T.Ivabradine 5 mg/day, and Bromocriptine 2.5 mg/day and recovered completely after three months with a normal ejection fraction of 60%. On follow-up after three months, she had stable cardiac status with normal ejection fraction and mild mitral regurgitation.

Discussion

Incidence and aetiology: A rare and potentially fatal syndrome known as PPCM is linked to high rates of maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality (1),(2). Cases 1 and 2 demonstrate unique PPCM presentations that included abrupt cardiogenic shock and failure symptoms and signs. A similar presentation was stated by Abdulraheem E et al., in which severe PPCM was complicated by COVID-19 infection, where the patient required emergent intubation, sedation, and mechanical ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure attributed to cardiogenic shock (1). When there is no other heart failure causes, it is defined by a decline in left ventricular systolic performance at the end of pregnancy or in the postpartum period (3),(4),(5).

Its true incidence is not known, ranging from 1 in 2,400 people to 15,000 people in western world (1),(3). There are regional differences, with larger incidences observed in parts of Africa (4). Different population demographics, the strictness of the definition, and underreporting brought on by ignorance or misinterpretation are likely to be the causes of the incidence’s wide variation (5).

Aetiology is still unknown. It is postulated that it may be due to nutritional deficiencies, small vessel coronary artery abnormality, hormonal effects, toxaemia, maternal immunological response to foetal antigen or myocarditis. Recurrence is common in subsequent pregnancies, and as a familial foundation for the condition has been shown (6), family planning may be impacted. Although the aetiology of PPCM remains unclear, a number of potential risk factors have been proposed.

Risk factors and clinical presentation: Horne D et al., study shows that the risk factors are multiparity, advanced maternal age, multifoetal gestation, preeclampsia, African descent, maternal cocaine abuse, selenium deficiency, long-term (more than four weeks) oral tocolytic therapy with beta adrenergic agonists which was in par with the present case series (7). Case 2 patient was presented with subclinical hypothyroidism and case 3 with gestational diabetes Mellitus. Despite these risk factors, the illness can still affect patients, and this is the subject of future research that could lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Congestive heart failure symptoms and signs, as well as chest pain, are clinical manifestations of PPCM. However, these symptoms and indications also appear in a wide range of different illnesses, from healthy pregnancy to pulmonary emboli and upper respiratory infections. In fact, this frequently results in missing or delayed diagnoses of PPCM and underestimating the condition’s prevalence (8).

Physical examination: Tachycardia, increased jugular venous pressure, pulmonary rales, and peripheral oedema are among the symptoms of heart failure that are frequently discovered during a physical examination. Chest radiography frequently reveals heart enlargement and pulmonary venous congestion, while an ECG normally exhibits sinus tachycardia with no discernible alterations (8). The index patients (Case 1 and Case 2) did not have any of these manifestations but had low systemic blood pressures, severe respiratory distress, and low cardiac output suggestive of cardiogenic shock. This prompted an early echocardiography which was suggestive of cardiac failure. Such catastrophic presentations though unusual can occur, with severe respiratory distress and low-output cardiac failure, necessitating immediate pharmacological and mechanical support (4). Hence, the differential diagnosis includes other pulmonary causes like acute pulmonary oedema, and cardiac causes including myocardial infarction or Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Differential diagnosis in the peripartum period is briefed in (Table/Fig 6).

Diagnosis: Diagnosis of PPCM includes four criteria:

1. Development of cardiac failure in the last month of pregnancy or within five months after delivery;
2. Absence of an identifiable cause for cardiac failure;
3. Absence of recognisable heart disease prior to the last month of pregnancy;
4. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction demonstrated by classic echo cardio graphic criteria such as depressed shortening fraction or ejection fraction (9),(10).

Management: The precise management approach for PPCM relies on each unique clinical instance however it primarily depends on the patient’s stability. As in first two cases, acute heart failure during pregnancy is treated in the same manner as acute heart failure at any other stage of life (9). This comprises beta blockers, nitrates, diuretics, inotropic support, and ventilatory support. Mechanical circulatory support, such as a Ventricular Assist Device (VAD), should be considered for individuals whose conditions worsen despite receiving the best medical care. As in third case, the management of patients with stable heart failure in PPCM comprises antifailure medications while avoiding ACE inhibitors and ARB during the prenatal period due to their toxicity (9). In PPCM, bromocriptine is recommended in acute and stable cardiac failure cases.

Follow-up and prognosis: It is unknown when to stop taking these meds, but atleast a year should pass before stopping. The last resort is frequently heart transplantation, if medical treatments are unsuccessful. Appreciatively, the rate that necessitated transplantation has dropped between 4% and 7% in recent years (11). Positive long-term survival rates and reasonable transplant success rates are present (12).

A normalisation of the ejection fraction occurs in roughly 50% of patients. Regardless of recovery, a second pregnancy is typically not advised for these patients due to the high danger for both mother and baby. PPCM recurs in more than 30% of subsequent pregnancies (13).

Conclusion

The PPCM is a very uncommon condition that can have fatal effects. Early detection and efficient treatment can raise the likelihood of full recovery with a healthy heart, as was the case in our instances, while also lowering mortality and morbidity rates. Cases 1 and 2 illustrate unusual presentations of PPCM with symptoms and signs of acute cardiogenic shock and failure. Case 3 illustrates the typical presentation of PPCM in the postpartum period. Thus, physicians need to be familiar with different presentations of PPCM and always consider it with a high index of suspicion to expedite treatment for a potentially lethal condition for a better outcome.

References

1.
Abdulraheem E, Shaikhoun M, Kung D. Severe peripartum cardiomyopathy complicated by COVID-19 infection and small intestinal obstruction. Clin Case Rep. 2021;9(7):e04505. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Gunderson EP, Croen LA, Chiang V, Yoshida CK, Walton D, Go AS. Epidemiology of peripartum cardiomyopathy: Incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(3):583-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Cunningham FG, Pritchard JA, Hankins GD, Anderson PL, Lucas MJ, Armstrong KF. Peripartum heart failure: Idiopathic cardiomyopathy or compounding cardiovascular events? Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67(2):157-68. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Veille JC. Peripartum cardiomyopathies: A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:805-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Witlin AG, Mabie WC, Sibai BM. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: An ominous diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176:182-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Sliwa K, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Petrie MC, Mebazaa A, Pieske B, Buchmann E, et al. Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Peripartum Cardiomyopathy. Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of peripartum cardiomyopathy: A position statement from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12(8):767-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Horne BD, Rasmusson KD, Alharethi R, Budge D, Brunisholz KD, Metz T, et al. Genome-wide significance and replication of the chromosome 12p11.22 locus near the PTHLH gene for peripartum cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011;4(4):359-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Marx JA, Hockberger RS, Walls RM, et al., Eds, “Rosen’s Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice.” 6th Edition, Philadelphia: Elsevier. 2006;1509-12.
9.
Pearson GD, Veille JC, Rahimtoola S, Hsia J, Oakley CM, Hosenpud JD, et al. Peripartum cardiomyopathy: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Office of Rare Diseases (National Institutes of Health) workshop recommendations and review. JAMA. 2000;283(9):1183-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Cardiovascular diseases. In: Dwight Rause, Bill Rainey, Cathy Spong, George Vendel Jr, editors. Williams Obsterics. 22nd edition. Mc Graw Hill. 2005:1030-32.
11.
Felker GM, Jaeger CJ, Klodas E, Thiemann DR, Hare JM, Hruban RH, et al. Myocarditis and long-term survival in peripartum cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2000;140(5):785-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Rickenbacher PR, Rizeq MN, Hunt SA, Billingham ME, Fowler MB. Long-term outcome after heart transplantation for peripartum cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 1994;127(5):1318-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Libby PP, Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP. Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 8th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; 2007, Pp. 1.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60800.17451

Date of Submission: Oct 14, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 01, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 14, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 06, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 09, 2022 (13%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com