Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 159528

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : SC17 - SC20 Full Version

Diphtheria Remains a Threat to the Health System Even in the Era of Vaccination: A Cross-sectional Observational Study from Karnataka, India


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59627.17548
Laxmi Kamath1, L Ramitha, Vinod Ratageri

1. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Laxmi Kamath,
B246, Fourth Floor, Ranka Colony, Bilekahalli, Bannerghatta Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: laxmikamath02@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Diphtheria is an infectious disease caused by a gram-positive facultatively anaerobic bacilli, Corynebacterium (C.) diphtheriae. The present health statistics and data from the few studies that have been carried out suggest that our war with this disease is still going on and is far from being over inspite of the vaccine that’s freely available.

Aim: To study clinical profile, complications, and outcome of diphtheria in Karnataka population and to correlate with immunisation status.

Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based prospective cross-sectional observational study done in the Department of Paediatrics, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India, from January 2018 to November 2018. Patients admitted with history suggestive of diphtheria were enrolled and categorised into probable and confirmed cases. The age, sex, area of residence, religion, immunisation status, mean time of presentation to hospital from onset of illness, use of inotropes and mechanical ventilation were recorded in a predesigned proforma. Throat swab smear for C.diphtheria and culture, complete blood count, Renal Function Tests (RFT) with serum electrolytes, chest radiograph, Electrocardiogram (ECG) and 2-Dimensional (2D) Echocardiogram (ECHO) were also recorded.

Results: Out of total 28 cases, 18 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Male to female ratio was 2:1 and the mean age of presentation was 9.7 years. Highest incidence (n=14, 77.8%) was seen in the age group of 09-11 years. Most common clinical presentation was fever and sore-throat present in all 18 (100%), neck swelling in 13 (72.2%), dysphagia in 05 (27.7%). Examination revealed tonsillar hypertrophy and pseudomembrane in 17 (94.4%) patients, whereas one patient had laryngeal diphtheria, which was diagnosed when swab was sent while intubating in view of membranous laryngitis. Mean time of presentation to hospital after the onset of symptoms was 5.65 days. All children received appropriate antibiotics and Antidiphtheritic Serum (ADS). Total of seven patients were ventilated, of which 5 (27.7%) succumbed, and two were extubated. Four (22.2%) patients developed myocarditis in the second week, and all succumbed to resistant arrhythmias. One patient developed sepsis with ventilator dependency, and succumbed to inotrope resistant septic shock. On follow-up, 5 (27.7%) developed palatal palsy among which three had associated polyneuropathy; all these children recovered with only supportive care.

Conclusion: Diphtheria is down but not out, the present study unmasks the fact that the disease is equally prevalent in immunised and older children with the changing epidemiology of diphtheria in the era of vaccines.

Keywords

Arrhthymias, Immunisation, Partially immunised, Upper respiratory tract

Diphtheria is an upper respiratory tract infection involving anterior nasal, pharyngeal, tonsillar or laryngeal mucous membranes. The organisms are locally invasive and secrete soluble exotoxins, which can lead to fatal consequences mainly involving the heart muscle and nervous system. The mortality rate, which is generally 5-10%, may be as high as 20% in children below 5 years and adults over 40 years of age (1). Incidence of the disease, which was more than a million per year during the first half of the 19th century declined by over 95% during the past three decades due to widespread immunisation (2). However, after this sharp decline in cases, there seems to be a plateau in the world incidence of the disease with India contributing as much as 78% of all cases between 2000-2017 (2),(3).

Due to the vaccine-preventable nature of the disease and initial steady decline, not much attention has been given towards this disease which has not only continued over the past decade in India but has also been sixth in the list with highest mortality rate in India. Current statistics show that diphtheria has been re-emerging (3),(4). This re-emergence is despite a reported increase in coverage of the National Immunisation Programme (NIP). The recent national health profile reports about 11270 cases of diphtheria in India with a mortality rate of 2% (3). Certainly, this information is a compilation of the data which is mostly limited to reports obtained from routine surveillance systems functioning in respective states and union territories in the country. Detailed literature on occurrence of diphtheria as cases or outbreaks has been very scanty. Literature that is available includes those cases and outbreaks in Vijayapura district of Karnataka and also mostly in northern India and also in Mumbai (5),(6),(7).

The present health statistics and data from the few studies that have been carried out suggest that the war with this disease is still going on and is far from being over inspite of the vaccine that’s freely available. At a global level there has been outbreaks of diphtheria in Rohingya refugees (8),(9). There have been recent outbreaks of this vaccine preventable disease in Venezuela, due to the tumbling economy and authoritarian rule prevailing in the country leading to a massive gap in immunisation coverage (10). Similar outbreak has been noticed in Yemen with the ongoing civil war since March 2015, which has severely affected the country’s infrastructure including health services. Less than 50% of existing health facilities is fully functional and there is a serious shortage of staff, medicine and equipment, this in turn, has led to outbreaks of vaccine preventable diseases and arthropod borne diseases (11). This research was taken up to study the clinical profile, vaccination status and predictors of mortality in the era of intensified routine immunisation in Hubballi, Dharwad district of Karnataka, India.

Material and Methods

This was a hospital-based prospective cross-sectional observational study done in the Department of Paediatrics, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India, from January 2018 to November 2018. Ethical clearance was obtained from the ethical committee of the institute. (EC no:KIMS/PGS/456/2017-2018). An informed written consent was taken from the parent/guardian.

Inclusion criteria: Patients presenting with fever, sore throat and membrane over tonsil were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Those patients with non adherent tonsillar membrane were excluded from the study.

Patients admitted with history suggestive of diphtheria were enrolled and categorised into probable and confirmed cases based on the following definitions (8):

• Probable diphtheria is an upper respiratory tract illness characterised by sore throat, low-grade fever, and an adherent membrane of the tonsils, pharynx, and/or nose.
• Confirmed diphtheria is a probable case supported by laboratory evidence either by: i) isolation of the organism from a clinical specimen; or ii) demonstration of a four-fold or greater rise in serum antibody titres in paired sera samples (only if both serum samples are obtained before the administration of diphtheria toxoid or antitoxin).

Study Procedure

The relevant information of study population was collected by interviewing the parents or guardians of the child, using a predesigned proforma. Demographic data including age, sex, areas of residence, religion, parental education and economic status were recorded. Detailed clinical history including immunisation status, mean time of presentation to hospital from onset of illness, use of inotropes and mechanical ventilation were recorded. Chest X-ray, Electrocardiogram (ECG) and 2-Dimensional (2D) Echocardiogram (ECHO) were done as and when indicated. Chest X-ray was done for all, ECG and ECHO helped in diagnosis of myocarditis. Children who had received three primary doses of Diphtheria Pertussis Tetanus (DPT) vaccine at 4-6 week intervals starting at six weeks of age, followed by booster doses at 18 months and five years were recorded as “immunised”. Those who had not received any dose were categorised as “unimmunised”. Partially immunised patients were the one who had missed one or more of the three primary doses or booster doses. However, for better comparison both unimmunised and partially immunised children were taken as one category. Detailed history of immunisation was taken orally and then crosschecked from immunisation cards of children whenever available. All children received appropriate antibiotics and Antidiphtheritic Serum (ADS). Details about antibiotics given and ADS administration were recorded for analysis.

Statistical Analysis

All the data was entered into Microsoft excel sheet and statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0. Data was expressed as mean±standard deviation for continuous metric data or median Interquartile Range (IQR) for those with the skewed distribution. Nominal categorical data between the groups was expressed as relative frequency, percent distributions and compared with Chi-square test or Fischer’s-exact test as appropriate. The comparison of normally distributed continuous variables between the groups was done by student t-test. The p-value of <0.05 was denoted as statistically significant.

Results

Out of 28 cases who presented with fever, sore throat, and membrane on tonsil, a total of 18 cases (64.28%) fulfilled inclusion criteria. Male to female ratio was 2:1 and the mean age of presentation was 9.7±0.9 years. Highest incidence (n=14, 77.8%) was seen in the age group of 09-11 years. Majority were from rural area 14 (77.8%), however all belonged to lower socio-economic status (modified Kuppuswamy classification). Out of 18 children, 5 (27.8%) were completely immunised, and 4 (22.2%) were unimmunised, and 9 (50%) were partially immunised.

Most common clinical presentation was fever and sore-throat present in all 18 (100%) patients, neck swelling in 13 (72.2%), dysphagia in 5 (27.7%). Examination revealed tonsillar hypertrophy and pseudomembrane in 17 (94.4%) patients, whereas one was a case of laryngeal diphtheria which was diagnosed when swab was sent while intubating in view of membranous laryngitis. Total of 13 (72.2%) cases had cervical lymphadenopathy and 4 (22.2%) had halitosis. Mean time of presentation to hospital after the onset of symptoms was 5.65 days. Only 8 (44.4%) patients presented within three days of onset of symptoms (Table/Fig 1).

Albert stain was positive in 13 (72%) cases, culture was positive for C.diphtheriae in remaining 5 (27.7%) cases. Seventeen (94.4%) children had pharyngeal/tonsillar involvement and 2 (6.6%) of them also had laryngeal involvement. All 18 were confirmed cases of C.diphtheriae.

Total of seven cases were ventilated of which five succumbed and two were extubated. Out of all, 4 (22.2%) patients developed myocarditis in the second week and all succumbed to resistant arrhythmias. One patient also developed complete airway obstruction, was tracheostomised immediately in view of difficult intubation, however, direct cause of death was cardiac arrhythmia. One patient developed sepsis with ventilator dependency and succumbed to inotrope resistant septic shock. So, a total of 5 (27.7%) patients succumbed to the disease (Table/Fig 2). On follow-up, 5 (27.7%) developed palatal palsy among which three had associated polyneuropathy; all these children recovered with only supportive care over a period of 16-24 weeks.

High mortality rate in the study was probably due to late presentation to hospital (mean time of presentation from the day of onset of symptoms=5.65 days) leading to delay in administration of ADS.

Other factors contributing to mortality include patient’s immunisation status, age at infection, clinical type, time of intervention and time of administration of antitoxin. (Table/Fig 3) compares the profile between survived and death patients.

Discussion

Diphtheria, if not detected early and treated promptly with antibiotics and ADS, can lead to significant mortality and morbidity because of critical complications such as myocarditis, obstructive airway disease, polyneuritis, cranial nerve palsies, disseminated intravascular coagulation and secondary pneumonia (12). Due to good vaccine coverage worldwide, a shift in age incidence has been observed from preschool to school age (5-15 years) with more and more cases being reported in adolescents and adults. The reported incidence for diphtheria in India has been 9622 and 8788 cases in the years 2019 and 2018, respectively as compared to 5293 and 3380 in the years 2017 and 2016, respectively (13). Countries like Yemen, Venezuela which are facing humanitarian crisis, civil war have witnessed outbreak of vaccine preventable diseases in the recent years and is largely attributed to lack of medical care and very poor immunisation coverage due to the crisis (10),(11).

The present study shows higher incidence of diphtheria in the age group of 09-11 years. Similar observations were made by other studies, about change in epidemiology of diphtheria that the disease which was common among under five children was now more prevalent in older children (14),(15). This change may be owing to the fact that immunity against all three components of DPT vaccine wanes over the next 6-12 years and thus emphasising the need for regular booster doses.

The signs and symptoms of diphtheria depend upon the site of infection, the immunisation status of the host, and whether or not toxin has been distributed to the systemic circulation. It was interesting to note that in the present study 27.8% were completely immunised and 22.2% were unimmunised and 50% were partially immunised. There is a report of occurrence of diphtheria with ocular manifestations in a fully immunised child (16). In a clinico-epidemiological study by Meera M and Rajarao M on a large sample in Andhra Pradesh 41% of the children were completely immunised (12). The possible explanation of occurrence of the disease in immunised patients could be individual variations in immune response to vaccines or failure of vaccine response (16). However, vaccine ineffectiveness (due to non maintenance of cold chain) at the time of use and improper technique of administration can also contribute to the disease burden. Also, greater number of cases among the partially immunised population emphasises the need for booster doses to combat this disease. In the present study, it was found that symptoms like bullneck was more in partially immunised and unimmunised population and was statistically significant. Also, total duration of hospital stay was also prolonged in partially immunised population (p-value <0.05). There is shift of epidemiology of diphtheria to early and mid-adolescence which necessitates the need of diphtheria booster dose at the beginning of adolescence. This point needs to be brought to notice before national immunisation advisory committee.

Myocarditis was observed to be the most common complication. In a study by Havaldar PV, 13 patients had left or right bundle branch blocks, or second degree or complete atrioventricular block associated with 58% mortality (17). Stockins BA et al., reported a mortality of 50% in patients with bundle branch block (18). Celik T et al., also demonstrated that the patients with left bundle branch block and T wave inversion had lower survival rates than that of patients without these ECG changes (19). In the present study, the mortality rate was 27.8%. It has been shown that use of antitoxin significantly reduced the mortality (3.3% in treated compared to 12.2% in untreated patients (20).

Neurologic complications appear after a variable latent period, are predominantly bilateral, are motor rather than sensory, and usually resolve completely. Paralysis of the soft palate is common and generally appears in the 3rd week. Patients who were immunised did not suffer from fatal complications like myocarditis and most of them recovered uneventfully.

When comparing the profile of survivors and death cases in this study, authors found that mean age of those who died was more and was statistically significant (p-value=0.0017). This was probably because the diphtheria severity was more in later ages when the effect of vaccination would have waned off. Also, late presentation to hospital was associated with higher chances of causing death. (p-value=0.018). This finding could be attributed to spread of toxin in systemic circulation and its adverse effects before antitoxin was administered.

Persistence of diphtheria is due to low coverage of booster immunisation. As immunity acquired by primary immunisation wanes over time, adequate coverage of booster doses is equally important. Administration of antitoxin serum definitely plays an important role, early administration was found to have a favourable outcome. Creating awareness among general population about the disease and preparedness among healthcare givers to fight the disease including accessibility to ADS should be prioritised (17).

Limitation(s)

The sample size was small due to the time-bound nature of the study. Genetic study of C.diphtheria and further categorisation into genotypes were not done.

Conclusion

Diphtheria is down but not out, this series unmasks the fact that the disease is equally prevalent in immunised and older children with the changing epidemiology of diphtheria in the era of vaccines. It was found in this study that immunised population definitely had less fatal complications and recovered better when compared to the unimmunised group. The outcome of patients also depended on the day of illness at presentation, late arrival to the hospital had more complications as the toxin would have already caused the damage. To conclude, it is high time to introspect on our immunisation practices and emphasise the need for “booster doses in routine immunisation” practices before diphtheria hits mankind like never before.

References

1.
Atkinson W, Hamborsky J, McIntyre L, Wolfe S, editors. Diphtheria. In: Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine-preventable Diseases. 10th ed. Washington, DC: Public Health Foundation; 2007. pp. 59-70.
2.
World Health Organization. Immunisation Surveillance, Assessment and Monitoring: Data, Statistics and Graphics. Available from: http:// www.who.int/ entity/immunisation_monitoring/data/incidence_series. xls. [Last accessed on 2012 Sep 01].
3.
World Health Organization. Diphtheria Reported Cases; 2010. Available at: http://apps.who.int/immunisation_monitoring/globalsummary/timeseries/ tsincidencediphtheria.html. Accessed June 2, 2012.
4.
Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Directorate General of Health Services, Government of India. National Health Profiles; 2018. Available from: http://www. cbhidghs.nic.in/index1.asp?linkid=267. [Last accessed on 2016 Dec 31].
5.
Parande MV, Roy S, Mantur BG, Parande AM, Shinde RS. Resurgence of diphtheria in rural areas of North Karnataka, India. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017;35(2):247-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Lodha R, Dash NR, Kapil A, Kabra SK. Diphtheria in urban slums in North India. Lancet. 2000;355:204. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Khan N, Shastri J, Aigal U, Doctor B. Resurgence of diphtheria in the vaccination era. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2007;25:434. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Rahman MR, Islam K. Massive diphtheria outbreak among Rohingya refugees: Lessons learnt. Journal of Travel Medicine. 2019;26(1):tay122. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Polonsky JA, Ivey M, Mazhar MK, Rahman Z, le Polain de Waroux O, Karo B, et al. Epidemiological, clinical, and public health response characteristics of a large outbreak of diphtheria among the Rohingya population in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, 2017 to 2019: A retrospective study. PLoS Medicine. 2021;18(4):e1003587. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Paniz-Mondolfi AE, Tami A, Grillet ME, Márquez M, Hernández-Villena J, Escalona-Rodríguez MA, et al. Resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases in Venezuela as a regional public health threat in the Americas. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2019;25(4):625. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Dureab F, Al-Sakkaf M, Ismail O, Kuunibe N, Krisam J, Müller O, et al. Diphtheria outbreak in Yemen: The impact of conflict on a fragile health system. Conflict and Health. 2019;13(1):01-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Meera M, Rajarao M. Diphtheria in Andhra Pradesh- A clinical-epidemiological study. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;19:74-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
WHO vaccine-preventable diseases: monitoring system. 2020 global summary. https://www.givewell.org/files/DWDA%202009/NewIncentives/WHO_ Vaccinepreventable_diseases_monitoring_system_2020_global_summary_ Nigeria.pdf.
14.
Nath B, Mahanta TG. Investigation of an outbreak of diphtheria in Borborooah block of Dibrugarh district, Assam. Indian journal of community medicine: Official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2010;35(3):436. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Saikia L, Nath R, Saikia NJ, Choudhury G, Sarkar M. A diphtheria outbreak in Assam, India. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2010;41(3):647.
16.
John TJ. Resurgence of diphtheria in India in the 21 st century. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2008;128(5):669-71.
17.
Havaldar PV. Diphtheria in the eighties: Experience in a South Indian District hospital. Journal of Indian Medical Association. 1992;90:155-56.
18.
Stockins BA, Lanas FT, Saavedra JG, Opazo JA. Prognosis in patients with diphtheric myocarditis and bradyarrhythmias: Assessment of results of ventricular pacing. British Heart Journal. 1994;72:190-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Celik T, Selimov N, Vekilova A, Kursaklioglu H, Iyisoy A, Kilic S, et al. Prognostic significance of electrocardiographic abnormalities in diphtheritic myocarditis after hospital discharge: A long-term follow-up study. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2006;11(1):28-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Chaya KA, Ratageri VH, Holeyannavar MN, Fattepur SR, Wari PK. Ocular manifestation of diphtheria in a fully immunised infant. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;83(3):272-73.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59627.17548

Date of Submission: Aug 12, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 31, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Sep 27, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 24, 2022
• Manual Googling: Sep 21, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Sep 24, 2022 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com