Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 30432

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : WC01 - WC04 Full Version

Psychological Morbidity in Young Adults with Acne Vulgaris: A Hospital-based Study


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/61797.17483
Deepika Agarwal, Deepak K Mathur, Vijay Paliwal

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Leprology, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, Safedabad, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Senior Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Leprology, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 3. Senior Professor, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Leprology, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Deepika Agarwal,
202, Scotia, Omaxe Heights, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: dr.deepika2009@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a disorder of pilo-sebaceous glands characterised by polymorphic lesions. Acne is highly prevalent among teenagers during which period body undergoes various developmental, hormonal and social changes. Acne may therefore affect the psyche of the patient leading to psychological morbidity.

Aim: To study the prevalence and gender-based variations of psychological morbidity in young adults with acne vulgaris.

Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based observational cross-sectional study done in the Dermatology Outpatient Department, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, India, from October 2012 to October 2013 on 660 acne patients. Patients aged 13-24 years clinically diagnosed with acne vulgaris were enrolled for the study and psychological morbidity was assessed by Goldberg’s Health Questionnaire-12 scores (GHQ) and depression and anxiety were assessed using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scores and Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) scores, respectively.

Results: Among 660 acne patients, 71.51% were males and 28.48% were females. Female patients had mean±Standard Deviation (SD) age of 18.06±2.93 years and male patients had mean±SD age of 18.16±2.41 years. Among 188 females, mild, moderate and severe acne were observed in 40.96%, 48.40% and 10.64% cases, whereas, among 472 males, 37.92%, 38.35% and 23.73% had mild, moderate and severe acne, respectively. Psychological morbidity was observed in 92 (48.94%) females and 227 (46.09%) male patients. In the study population, 5.32%, 28.19%, 13.83%, 1.60% patients had minimal, mild, moderate and severe depression, respectively in female group whereas in the male group 21.19%, 16.10%, 7.84% and 2.97% patients had minimal, mild, moderate and severe depression, respectively. Further, 27.66%, 10.64%, 3.72%, 6.91% of female patients whereas 30.51%, 8.26%, 3.81%, 5.51% of male patients had mild, moderate, severe and very severe anxiety level, respectively.

Conclusion: The study assessed that acne affected self-esteem and confidence of the youth and can lead to mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression. The severity of depression and anxiety was linked with gender in the present study.

Keywords

Anxiety, Beck depression inventory score, Depression, Hamilton rating scale for anxiety score

Acne is a common, self-limiting condition but may sometimes lead to psychological issues and/or disfiguring scars over the affected areas (1). It is a pleomorphic disorder and may appear at any age, but majority of population (85%) have acne during 12-24 years of age (2),(3),(4),(5).

Psychological issues associated with acne have been observed by many clinicians and multiple studies have been done in the past which supported a positive association between acne and emotional and functional wellbeing of the patient (3),(5),(6),(7). Aversion to social interaction, discontentment with self-appearance, reduced employment opportunities, low confidence and self-esteem have been documented in the past with patients with acne (7),(8),(9).

It may be difficult to predict the impact of acne on the psyche of the patient. The impact of the condition on a patient can be influenced by many factors which includes age, psychosocial developmental period, baseline self-esteem, individual coping abilities, clinical severity of the disease, family and peer support system, personality traits and other underlying psychopathology (7),(8),(9),(10).

Adolescents are most susceptible to the negative psychological effects as they constitute the most prominent group having acne. Various studies have been done in past to evaluate level of depression and anxiety in acne patients using various scoring methods (1),(3),(5),(6),(9). Studies have reported that patients with acne are at increased risk for psychological morbidity such as anxiety and depression irrespective of the degree of severity of acne (1),(3),(5),(9),(10),(11).

It is impossible to assess acne’s psychological and social impact in a particular individual by clinical assessments alone. Descriptive studies can be carried out to identify various risk factors as well as understand the burden of acne in a community for better management (12),(13). Thus, the study aimed to assess the prevalence and gender-based variations of psychological morbidity in young adults with acne vulgaris.

Material and Methods

This was a hospital-based observational cross-sectional study which was conducted in the patients in Outpatient Department (OPD) of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, SMS Medical College and Attached Hospitals, Jaipur, India, from October 2012 to October 2013 on 660 acne patients. The study was initiated after the approval of Institutional Ethical Committee (SMS/IRB/2012-13/48490).

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated using following formula,

n=Zα2p (1-p)/E2

p=prevalence or proportion
Zα=critical value of standard normal variate at α level of significance (at α=5%, Zα=1.96)
E=Margin of error or permissible error
p=85%=0.85(5)
E=3%=0.03 (Absolute margin of error)
n=(1.96)2×0.85 (1-0.85)/(0.03)2=544.27
n=544.27+108.85 (considering 20% drop out of study participants)
n=653.12
n=660 (rounded off near about ten)

Therefore, the total number of study participants has been taken as 660.

Patients presented with skin lesions characterised by comedones, papules, pustules, nodules and/or cysts were examined clinically and diagnosed for acne vulgaris (2).

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with acne vulgaris in the age group 13-24 years, literates such that he/she could understand the questionnaire and who gave written informed consent were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients suffering from chronic medical or surgical illnesses, who were taking antipsychotic medications and, oral isotretinoin, patients suffering from other chronic dermatological disorders and from organic brain syndrome were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

A detailed demographic data was recorded along with history taking which included age and gender of the patients, age of onset of disease, duration of disease, family history present and treatment taken in past. Cutaneous examination was done and type of skin, distribution, morphology and severity of acne was analysed in each patient. The severity of acne was assessed using Pochi criteria into mild, moderate and severe as depicted in (Table/Fig 1). If the number of lesions were <5 it was classified as ‘few’, if 5-15 then as ‘many’ and 15-30 lesions was taken as ‘several’, >30 taken as ‘numerous’/‘extensive’ (14).

Psychological profile of all patients was evaluated using Goldberg’s Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ) scores (15). It is a self-administered 12-item questionnaire in which respondent is asked to compare his recent state with his usual state. Interpretation of the answers is based on a four-point response scale scored using a bimodal method (symptom present: ‘not at all’=0, ‘same as usual’=0, ‘more than usual’=1 and ‘much more than usual’=1). Maximum score is 12 and cut-off score is 2 or more. The patients who met the GHQ criteria, was subjected to detailed evaluation of depression and anxiety by administering Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score and Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAMA) score, respectively (15),(16),(17).

Beck depression inventory is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory, one of the most widely used instrument for measuring the severity of depression. Each question has a set of atleast four possible answer choices, ranging in intensity (0-4) as depicted in (Table/Fig 2)a whereas, BDI scores were calculated by summing all answers and interpretation was done as depicted in (Table/Fig 2)b.

Anxiety is calculated using HAMA. The scale consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms, and measures both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints related to anxiety) (17). Each item was scored on a scale of 0 (not present) to 4 (severe) as depicted in (Table/Fig 3)a, while the final interpretation was done as depicted in (Table/Fig 3)b.

Statistical Analysis

Information so gained and data collected was entered in Microsoft excel worksheet. Continuous variables were presented as mean±standard deviation (range), and categorical variables as frequency (%). Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test. For testing of continuous variables Student’s t-test was used. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 15.0 and advanced excels.

Results

Among 660 acne patients, 71.51% were males and 28.48% were females with male to female ratio of 2.5:1. Mean±Standard Deviation (SD) age of female patients was 18.06±2.93 years and mean±SD age of male patients was18.16±2.41 years. Majority of patients had onset of acne during 15-19 years of age (62.27%). Mean age of onset of acne was 16.46±2.48 years in male group and 16.10±2.51 years in female group. Mean duration of acne (months) was 19.5±12.3 months and 22.3±19.1 months in males and females, respectively. Both groups were comparable in terms of mean age, mean age of onset and duration of acne. Face was affected in 46.81% of females over 29.87% of males. Facial and extra facial involvement was significantly predominant among males (70.13%) than females (53.19%); 660 acne patients, 48.33% 35.64% females and 99.16% males had taken prior acne treatment. Acne was more prevalent in oily skin which constituted 84.84% of patients.

Severity of acne in both groups is depicted in (Table/Fig 4). Male patients had more severe acne over females. Among 660 acne patients, 48.33% patients scored positively on GHQ-12 as depicted in (Table/Fig 5). Though the prevalence of psychological morbidity was high in the study there was no gender difference among both groups.

The BDI scores is depicted in (Table/Fig 6). The level of depression was high in the study group. There was almost same level of depression observed in acne patients with respect to gender in minimal, mild and moderate category. However, level of depression was significantly more in male patients in severe category.

Gender-based distribution of anxiety is depicted in (Table/Fig 7). Level of anxiety was high in study group. There was almost same level of anxiety observed in acne patients with respect to gender in moderate, severe and very severe category however, the level of anxiety was more in mild category in female patients and data was statistically significant.

Discussion

Acne vulgaris is a common skin condition in adolescence and during this phase of life youth undergo various physical, social and mental changes (5). Acne lesions modify the individual’s perception hence, there is a need to evaluate the impact of acne on patient’s life to improve physician patient relationship and to give added perspective in the assessment of newer therapies and prompt referral to psychiatrist whenever required (2),(3),(5),(6),(9),(10),(13),(18),(19).

The study showed that acne was more prevalent in males. Similarly, Smithard A et al., reported prevalence of acne in 56% boys and 45% girls (20). Aktan S et al., in their study too reported preponderance of acne in males (21). Rao A et al., had also explored in their study that the mechanism and severity of acne was associated with androgens (22). This is in contrast to some studies where majority of study population were females, probably because females are more conscious of their appearance (18),(19).

Acne usually starts in adolescence and the age group included in different studies done in this regard are variable due to geographical distribution and racial variations, which ranged from 12-30 years (5),(6),(8),(9),(12),(13),(16),(18),(19). Some studies have shown that genetic factors influence susceptibility to acne which was in accordance with the index study (23),(24).

Face was the most common site involved in the study, since it affects the appearance of an individual which make it more bothersome than acne at any other sites. Moreover, the greater preponderance of acne over the face may be because of higher amount of surface lipids and greater number of pilosebaceous units over the face (18),(23). In the study, oily skin was observed in 82.45% and 85.81% of female and male acne patients however no gender difference was observed. Klingman AM and Mills OH suggested that excessive oiliness in acne patients was due to hyperplasia of sebaceous glands and their increased secretions (25). This was unrelated to gender as both male and female acne patients averagely excrete more sebum than normal subjects. As acne most often involves face, patients may undergo psychosocial distress because of progression of disease (26). Occurrence of even a small lesion over face might be unpleasant (1). Patients with acne have high levels of anxiety and depression as compared to healthy individuals (27).

Several studies have shown that patients with acne have a higher unemployment rate than others and are more susceptible to anxiety, depression, low mood, isolation from society, suicidal thoughts and even suicide itself (8),(21),(28). Prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with acne is different in various studies (3),(5),(9),(21),(27). Earlier studies have reported 25.6% and 31.1% level of depression in acne patients (27),(29). While clinical anxiety have been reported as 47.82% and 68.3% in acne patients (5),(27). In the index study, authors found higher percentage of depression and anxiety (48.33%) in the study population. There was statistically significant difference observed between male and female patients with respect to severe depression category in BDI score and male acne patients were found to have more depression. Past studies did not report any significant difference between two genders for BDI scores (1),(3),(27). There was gender difference observed with respect to mild anxiety category in HAMA score in the present study and females were found to have more anxiety which was in accordance to some studies done in past which supports that these disorders are more prevalent in woman (1),(21),(25).

Limitation(s)

The severity of depression and anxiety was not compared with severity and duration of acne.

Conclusion

Every patient of acne is different and hence requires individualised treatment and care to assess the impact of the disease on the psychology of the sufferer. According to existence of some mental disorders in patients with acne timely evaluation and screening and prompt referral is required. This can be done by simple questionnaire such as GHQ score, BDI score and HAMA score on OPD basis, which are simple, easy to apply and less time consuming. Stress management, relaxation therapy and appropriate treatment of psychiatry co-morbidity in patients with acne is need of the hour and ultimately the relationship between acne and psychiatric morbidity is worth exploring as possible behaviour interventions can be useful in patients treatment management.

References

1.
Yazici K, Baz K, Yazici AE, Köktürk A, Tot S, Demirseren D, et al. Disease-specific quality of life is associated with anxiety and depression in patients with acne. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2004;18:435-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Winston MH, Shalita AR. Acne vulgaris-pathogenesis and treatment. Pediatr Cli North Am. 1991;38:889-903.[crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Mishra N, Rastogi M Kant, Gahalaut P, Srivastava N, Aggarwal A. Assessment of depression in patients of acne vulgaris and its correlation with severity of acne, post acne scarring and gender. J Pak Assoc Dermatol. 2017;27(4):313-19.
4.
Li C. Use of isotretinoin and risk of depression in patients with acne: A systematic review and metaanalysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e021549. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Kandre DD, Kariya MM, Patel AV. Prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression in patients of acne vulgaris. IP Indian J Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;6(3):243-48. [crossref]
6.
Gupta A, Sharma YK, Dash KN, Chaudhari ND, Jethani S. Quality of life in acne vulgaris: Relationship to clinical severity and demographic data. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016;82:292-97. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Tan JK. Psychosocial impact of acne vulgaris: Evaluating the evidence. Skin Therapy Lett. 2004;9:01-03.
8.
Magin P, Adams J, Heading G, Pond D, Smith W. Psychological sequelae of acne vulgaris: Results of a qualitative study. Can Fam Physician. 2006;52:978-79.
9.
Purvis D, Robinson E, Merry S, Watson P. Acne, anxiety, depression and suicide in teenagers: A cross-sectional survey of New Zealand secondary school students. J Paediatr Child Health. 2006;42:793-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Sayar K, Ugurad I, Kural Y, Acar B. The psychometric assessment of acne vulgaris patients. Dermatol Psychosom. 2001;1:62-65. [crossref]
11.
Khan MZ, Naeem A, Mufti KA. Prevalence of mental health problems in acne patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2001;13:07-08.
12.
Mufaddel A, Elnour AA, Omer AA, Alshora EH. Psychiatric comorbidity in patients with acne. Open Journal of Psychiatry. 2017;7:176-85. [crossref]
13.
Someshwar S, Ahire P, Pawar R, Mohanty N. Assessment of the impact of acne vulgaris on the quality of life of preadolescents in Navi-Mumbai. New Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2019;8(2):46-69.
14.
Pochi PE. The pathogenesis and treatment of acne. Ann Rev Med. 1990;41:187-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Goldberg D. Identifying psychiatric illnesses among general medical patients. British Medical Journal. 1985;291:161-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4(6):561-71. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32:50-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Durai PC, Nair DG. Acne vulgaris and quality of life among young adults in South India. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60(1):33-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Tasoula E, Gregoriou S, Chalikias J, Lazarou D, Danopoulou I, Katsambas A, et al. The impact of acne vulgaris on quality of life and psychic health in young adolescents in Greece. Results of a population survey. An Bras Dermatol. 2012;87:862-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Smithard A, Glazebrook C, Williams HC. Acne prevalence, knowledge about acne and psychological morbidity in mid-adolescence: A community-based study. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145:274-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Aktan S, Ozmen E, Sanli B. Anxiety, depression and nature of acne vulgaris in adolescents. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39(5):354-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Rao A, Douglas SC, Hall JM. Endocrine disrupting chemicals, hormone receptors, and acne vulgaris: A connecting hypothesis. Cells. 2021;10(6):1439. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Walton S, Wyatt E, Cunliffe WJ. Genetic control of sebum excretion and acne. A twin study. Br J Dermatol. 1988;18:393-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Common JEA, Barker JN, Van Steensel MAM. What does acne genetics teach us about disease pathogenesis? Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(4):665-76. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Kligman AM, Mills OH. Acne cosmetica. Arch Dermatol. 1972;106(6):843-50. [crossref]
26.
Layton AM, Seukeran D, Cunliffe WJ. Scarred for life? Dermatology. 1997;195:15-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Golchai J, Khani SH, Heidarzadeh A, Eshkevari SS, Alizade N, Eftekhari H. Comparison of anxiety and depression in patients with acne vulgaris and healthy individuals. Indian J Dermatol. 2010;55:352-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Cunliffe WJ. Acne and unemployment. Br J Dermatol. 1986;115:386. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Behnam B, Taheri R, Ghorbani R, Allameh P. Psychological impairments in the patients with acne. Indian J Dermatol. 2013;58:26-29.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61797.17483

Date of Submission: Nov 22, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Dec 14, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 03, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 30, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 26, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 02, 2023 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com