Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 201588

AbstractMaterial and MethodsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Research Protocol
Year : 2023 | Month : February | Volume : 17 | Issue : 2 | Page : YK01 - YK04 Full Version

Evaluation of Effectiveness of Contrast Bath vs Knee Pad Device on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients: A Research Protocol


Published: February 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/57477.17453
Pranali Sunil Fokmare, Pratik Phansopkar

1. Resident, Department of Physiotherapy (Musculoskeletal), Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor and Head, Department of Physiotherapy (Musculoskeletal), Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Pratik Phansopkar,
Associate Professor and Head, Department of Physiotherapy (Musculoskeletal), Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drpratik77@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Osteoarthritis of knee is one of the most enfeebling conditions that causes pain and functional impairment that adversely affects life quality. Contrast bath therapy causes alternate vasodilatation and vasoconstriction when limb is dipped in warm and cold water, respectively. Knee pad device gives vibrations and heating therapy by infrared light and ice pack is used to give cryotherapy. Here otago exercise program is used to strengthen lower limbs and balance training along with walking protocol.

Need of Study: One of the most frequent joint ailments in the adult population is osteoarthritis because of which there is a notable limitation of mobility. In grade 1 and 2 osteoarthritis people experience pain and stiffness in knee joint. Many studies have been done using traditional immersion contrast bath technique for reducing pain. But it is difficult to find research on contrast therapy using a device.

Aim: To compare the effect of contrast bath therapy and knee pad device on pain, range of motion and functional disability in grade 1 and 2 knee osteoarthritis.

Materials and Methods: This study will be a randomised clinical trial and will be conducted in the Outpatient Department, AVBRH and Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. This study has been approved from Institutional Ethical Committee of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, (DU). Duration of this study will be for a period of one year fromJanuary 2022 to January 2023. Sixty participants with grade 1 or 2 osteoarthritis of knee will be included in the study and randomly divided in two groups with 30 in each. Group A will be given contrast bath therapy and group B will be given treatment with knee pad device and otago exercise program given in both groups. Treatment will be given for two weeks with three sessions per week. Pre and post-treatment pain, range of motion and functional disability will be noted and statistical analysis will be done.

Conclusion: The present study results are expected to establish knee pad device as more effective and easy method than contrast bath therapy in knee osteoarthritis.

Keywords

Extension, Flexion, Goniometer, Otago exercise program

Osteoarthritis, or degenerative joint disease of the knee, is one of the most enfeebling conditions which causes pain and functional impairment that negatively affects the quality of life (1). It mainly affects the knee joint, which plays important role in stabilising the body in erect posture (2),(3). There is a worsening of the cartilage of the joint and sclerosis of bone beneath the cartilage’s surface, leading to pain, stiffness and disability (4). It indeterminately occurs in the elderly age group, above 45 years more predominant in females, while common in males before 45 years of age (5). Osteoarthritis affects knee joints at a reported rate of 76% (6). The condition characterised joint pain, tenderness, movement limitation, crepitus, periodic effusion and different degrees of inflammation characterised the condition (7).

On radiographic findings and using the Kallgren and Lawrence system, the severity of osteoarthritis is graded from 0-4 (8). In grade 1 osteoarthritis, an X-ray may not reveal any damage, but osteophytes can be an early sign of it, and people experience discomfort or pain. In grade 2, X-rays will possibly show narrowing of the space in the joints, and osteophytes and people experience stiffness and joint pain, especially after resting for a while. In grade 3, there is a narrowing of joint space but not too severe, with osteophyte formation and some sclerosis with some bony end deformities. In grade 4, there is a severe reduction in joint space with osteophytes growth and deformities of bony ends. Intra-articular adhesions, as well as periarticular and intramuscular adhesions lead to stiffness (9).

Contrast bath therapy is a non pharmacological therapeutic option to reduce pain and stiffness in osteoarthritis. In this treatment extremity is dipped alternately in warm water and cold water. This cycle is repeated several times (10). Immersion in warm water causes vasodilatation which increases blood flow and releases endorphins and encephalin hormones which helps to block pain stimulus. Immersion in cold water causes vasoconstriction, which reduces oedema, thus relieves pressure from pain receptors and provides relief (11). But in this treatment large amount of water is used and along with that there is limitation in mobility and temperature control of water (12).

The knee pad device gives vibration and heating, along with this cooling is given by using an ice pack to treat pain. This device is built with heating pads inside, which provide a temperature of 40°-45°C. The heating and vibration mode can be adjusted according to the need. Infrared emits heat through vibrations of molecules which increases blood flow and intracellular fluid that removes metabolic waste and increase nutrient supply to the tissues. That leads to a decrease in pain and muscle spasms. Cryotherapy applied using an ice pack increases the pain threshold and dulls the sensations (12). Vibrations work on the basis of pain gait theory to reduce pain perception (13).

The most often utilised treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee is exercise therapy. Physical activity is one type of non pharmacological pain management approach (14). It can help you maintain your strength and mobility (15). In people with knee osteoarthritis, proprioceptive exercises in both weight-bearing and non weight-bearing positions can improve proprioceptive acuity and reduce pain and functional dysfunction (16). Otago exercise help osteoarthritis patients improve their static and dynamic balance through focused limb strength and balance function training. Walking is the second portion of the programme (17).

A smart knee pad device used to treat knee joint pain which gives vibration, heating and cooling alternately, shows improvement in pre and post values of the pain (18). When contrast bath therapy was compared with contrast therapy using infrared and cryotherapy on forearm pain, which showed better improvement in contrast therapy group. These devices are easy to move and temperature is controlled easily. As they overcome the disadvantage of contrast bath therapy i.e. difficulty in maintaining mobility and constant treatment temperature (12).

Studies have been done giving contrast bath therapy using traditional water dipped in method, towel compression, alternate heat packs and cold packs (19), method for knee osteoarthritis [10,11,19]. But authors did not find the study comparing the contrast bath therapy with knee pad devices in knee osteoarthritis patients.

The present study will be conducted with a research question, will there be any significant effect of knee pad device when compared to traditional contrast bath therapy method in reducing pain, increasing range and reducing functional disability? There are two possible hypotheses derived: Null hypothesis (H0): There will be no significant effect of knee pad device and contrast bath therapy on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with osteoarthritis of knee (or) Alternate hypothesis (H1): There will be significant effect of knee pad device and contrast bath therapy on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with osteoarthritis of knee with either of them superseding each other.

Material and Methods

Study will be a randomised clinical trial conducted in the Outpatient Department (OPD), AVBRH and Ravi Nair Physiotherapy College, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India, as this study has been approved from Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC/2022/797) of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, (DU) and the CTRI number for the study is 2022/05/042506 which was prospectively registered. The prevalence of osteoarthritis of knee is 3.63 per hundred (20). So, this population has been selected for the study. Patients who came to the OPD with knee osteoarthritis and who fulfilled the inclusion criteria will be included in the study. Randomisation will be done by computer generated sequential random numbers and the allocation will be done using sealed envelope method.

Randomisation will be done by computer generated sequential random numbers and the allocation will be done using sealed envelope method.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated by taking prevalence of osteoarthritis of knee as 3.8% from previous study (21). With the level of significance at 5% i.e., 95% confidence interval and desired error of margin of 7%, Dnaiel formula




was used and 28.65 was the sample size which was rounded off to 30. So, 30 participants will be recruited in group A and 30 participants in group B (n=60).

Inclusion criteria: Both male and female participants aged between 40-60 years, with unilateral knee osteoarthritis grade 1 or 2 diagnosed in X-ray according to Kallgren and Lawrence classification (8) and with stiffness occurring in the knee should not lasting for more than 30 minutes will be included in the study (22).

Exclusion criteria: Patients with grade 3 or 4 of osteoarthritis according to Kallgren and Lawrence classification, having superficial and deep sensory impairments, suffering from systemic illness like cardiac diseases, physical disabilities that are severe (i.e., not able to walk even with a walking aid), participating in another OA intervention study, and patients not willing to participate in the study will be excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Participant timeline: Duration of the study will be one year i.e., from January 2022 to January 2023 and duration of intervention will be two weeks. Assessment will be done on 1st day before treatment and then at the end of treatment (2nd week).

Implementation: Randomisation will be supervised by the research coordinator and principal investigator. Subjects will be asked to select the sealed envelope and were randomly allocated in either group.

Blinding: Assessor will be blinded for group allocations i.e which treatment group patient belong is not known to them.

Before starting, the intervention, research, and data confidentiality will be explained to all participants and who meet the inclusion criteria (n=60) will be required to sign an informed consent form before being enrolled in the study, which will last for two weeks.

Intervention and intervention design: Group A will get contrast bath therapy. Patient will be in sitting position, with lower limb exposed till mid-thigh and will be dipped in the warm water with set temperature between 38-40°C for four minutes and then in cold water with temperature between 12-14°C for one minute. This alternate dipping in warm and cold water is continued for 20 minutes.

Group B will get knee pad device: The device will be applied over the knee joint. The heating and vibration mode will be adjusted according to patients need. This is applied for four minutes and then cryotherapy is given using ice pack for one minute. This alternate heat and cold treatment are applied for 20 minutes.

Both groups will get Otago Exercise Program (OEP): This program is a collection of muscle-strengthening and balance-retraining exercises developed by the University of Otago. It begins warm-up that includes flexibility exercises, followed by lower-limb strengthening and balancing exercises (23). Strengthening exercises will be given to knee extensors and flexors, hip abductor, ankle plantar flexors and dorsiflexors. Resistance is provided by ankle weight cuffs with 10 repetitions in each set. Balance retraining exercise will be given as knee bending, walking and turning around on figure of eight-mark, Sideways walking, Backward walking, Tandem stance, Tandem walk and one leg stance according to this program.

Primary Outcome Measures

Visual analogue scale: It is a measurement tool for pain. It’s a 10 cm bidirectional straight line with “no pain” and “worst possible pain” written on it, at either end of the line. Patients are asked to draw vertical line as a mark on it which will indicate their level of perception of pain. The distance from the left end point to the marked point is calculated and recorded (24).

Universal goniometer: It is an instrument used to measure range of motion of joint. Knee flexion and extension will be measured using goniometer and this range of knee flexion between 0-150° and extension 150-0° will be recorded in degree.

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): It is a 24-item questionnaire. It measures three variables (pain, stiffness and function) that are thought to be important in determining patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in Osteoarthritis (OA). Each item offers 5 responses that is 0 means ‘none’, 1 means ‘mild’, 2 means ‘moderate’, 3 means ‘severe’ and 4 means ‘extreme’. The total score for each subscale is the sum of scores for each response to each item is calculated. Higher scores mean worse pain, stiffness, or physical function, 96 would be the maximum score obtained by the subjects. Based on the WOMAC score obtained, patients were categorised as low risk (score ≤60), moderate risk (score 60-80) and high risk (score ≥81). Patients are instructed to fill out the scale after it has been explained to them (25).

Secondary Outcome Measure

2-minute Walk Test (2-MWT): The 2MWT is regarded to be a tool for determining exercise tolerance. It will be performed in a quiet passageway 30 m in length approximately. Subjects will be given two minutes to go as far as they could using their usual walking aid (26).

Data collection and management: All baseline tests and assessments, as well as the information about the study given at the time of recruitment (explaining the purpose, nature, process, advantages, and after effects of the intervention), will be repeated one more time.

Statistical Analysis

The difference between two means will be tested using descriptive and interferential statistics, including Chi-square and students t-test. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 27.0 and Graphed Prism version 7.0 will be utilised in the analysis, with a threshold of significance of p-value <0.05 being used.

EXPECTED OUTCOME

Osteoarthritis being a prevalent disease, affects the routine activities and increases liability. The present study findings are expected to bring out knee pad device as an effective method to decrease pain, improve range of motion and reduce the functional disability in knee OA patients. This is an expected outcome.

Discussion

This study will be done to the effect of contrast bath therapy with otago exercise program and knee pad device along with otago exercise program in knee osteoarthritis patients on pain, range of motion and functional disability. The alternate vasodilatation and vasoconstriction help to reduce pain and thus helps to increase range.

A study conducted by Priya L et al., in which they used smart knee pain relief pad based on vibration, alternate heating and cooling for the treatment of knee pain. Pain score on NPRS before and after the treatment was taken. Results showed that mean value of pain before treatment was 5.666666667 and after the use of device was reduced to 2.466666667. This concluded that treatment provided by the gadget is highly significant (18).

Rusminingsih E et al., conducted a study, participants selected with knee pain and contrast bath was warm and cold compresses using a towel. Results showed significant change in pain score before and after the treatment. And they concluded that contrast bath is effective in reducing knee joint pain in elderly (11).

elFatah MIA et al., conducted a study, participants were selected with osteoarthritis of knee. Group 1 was given cold application by using wrapping cold pads, and group 2 was given contrast hydrotherapy using heated pads and alternately cold pads. The results showed that there was greater pain relief and functional improvement in contrast hydrotherapy group than cold therapy group (19).

Conclusion

The knee pad device is compared with the traditional contrast bath method. If knee pad device is proved to be more effective, it can be an easy method for pain relief than the long procedure of contrast bath therapy. Temperature regulation will be easy with this device which is important for the effect of treatment.

Ethical approval and dissemination: The study’s participants and the DMIMSU that will sponsor it will be able to access the study’s findings. After the study is completed and the results are published, the data will be archived in the DMIMSU data repository.

Patient consent: A written informed consent in local language will be taken from the patients by the principal investigators as a proof of confidentiality.

Confidentiality: The participant will be briefed about the study protocol, and the primary investigator will collect subjective data. The confidentiality declaration, as well as the signatures of the principal investigator, the patient, and a witness, will be included on the permission form. If the patient’s consent is required to share some information for the study, he will be given total assurance of his privacy.

References

1.
Briggs AM, Cross MJ, Hoy DG, Sànchez-Riera L, Blyth FM, Woolf AD, et al. Musculoskeletal health conditions represent a global threat to healthy aging: A report for the 2015 World Health Organization World report on ageing and health. The Gerontologist. 2016;56:S243-S255. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Deshmukh M. Physiotherapy rehabilitation in patient with bow leg deformity. Jmpas. 2021;10:3214-17. [crossref]
3.
Wadhokar O. Medial meniscal tear. Journal of Medical Pharmaceutical and Allied Sciences. 2021;10:3340-42. [crossref]
4.
Chang G, Xia D, Chen C, Madelin G, Abramson SB, Babb JS, et al. 7T MRI detects deterioration in subchondral bone microarchitecture in subjects with mild knee osteoarthritis as compared with healthy controls. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41:1311-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Pal CP, Singh P, Chaturvedi S, Pruthi KK, Vij A. Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. IJOO. 2016;50:518-22. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Knee Osteoarthritis- Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 30]. Available from: https://www.ftrdergisi.com/abstract.php?id=3086.
7.
Bhaskar A, Areekal B, Vasudevan B, Ajith R, Ravi S, Sankar S. Osteoarthritis of knee and factors associated with it in middle aged women in a rural area of central Kerala, India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2016;2926-2931. [crossref]
8.
Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in brief: Kellgren-Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1886-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Jawade. Comparison of effectiveness of hold-relax technique and maitlandfs mobilization in improving range of motion in posttraumatic stiffness of knee joint. [cited 2022 May 31]. Available from: http://www.journaldmims.com/article.asp?issn=0974-3901;year=2020;15(3):402-06. [crossref]
10.
Sathyan J. A study to compare the effectiveness of hot bath versus contrast bath on level of pain perception among patients with arthritis in selected hospital, Kanyakumari district. St. Xavier’s Catholic College of Nursing, Chunkankadai; 2018 [cited 2022 Apr 26]. Available from: http://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/11728/.
11.
Rusminingsih E, Agustina N, Wulan D. The effectiveness of contrast bath to reduce joint pain in the elderly. MEDISAINS. 2020;17:53. [crossref]
12.
Kim J, Jung H, Yim J. Effects of contrast therapy using infrared and cryotherapy as compared with contrast bath therapy on blood flow, muscle tone, and pain threshold in young healthy adults. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e922544-1-e922544-8. [crossref]
13.
Hollins M, McDermott K, Harper D. How does vibration reduce pain? Perception. 2014;43:70-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Deshpande S. Correlation of physical activity with fear of fall in patients with total knee replacement. Jmpas. 2021;10:3284-87. [crossref]
15.
Zunzunwala S. Rehabilitation of patient with tibia-fibula fracture. Jmpas. 2021;10:3427-39. [crossref]
16.
Adhama AI, Akindele MO, Ibrahim AA. Effects of variable frequencies of kinesthesia, balance and agility exercise program in adults with knee osteoarthritis: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22:470. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Xie C, Wang W, Pei J, Wang H, Lv H. Effect of otago exercise on falls in patients with osteoarthritis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(50):e23559. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Priya L, Vignesh V, Krishnan V, Ajeesh RP. Design and development of a smart knee pain relief pad based on vibration and alternate heating and cooling treatments. Technol Health Care. 2018;26(3):543-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
elFatah MIA, Weheida SM, Mekkawy MM. Effect of cold application versus contrast hydrotherapy on patients knee osteoarthritis outcomes. American Journal of Nursing Science. 2019;8:145. [crossref]
20.
Bhandarkar P, Patil P, Shekhar C, Nandan K. Prevalence of osteoarthritis knee: Four year study based on digital records of comprehensive healthcare setup at Mumbai, India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health. 2016;1049-53. [crossref]
21.
Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: Estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2014;73:1323-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Skou ST, Koes BW, Grønne DT, Young J, Roos EM. Comparison of three sets of clinical classification criteria for knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study of 13,459 patients treated in primary care. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2020;28:167-72.[crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Binns E, Taylor D. The effect of the otago exercise programme on strength and balance in the community dwelling older women. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. 2011;39(2):63-68.
24.
Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal A, Iqbal ZA. Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain. J Pain Res. 2018;11:851-56. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Jain A, Raja R, Kumar K. Effectiveness of short form-36 health status questionnaire versus WOMAC arthritis index questionnaire on chronic knee osteoarthritis patients. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2021;15(3):RC01-RC05. [crossref]
26.
Brooks D, Davis AM, Naglie G. Validity of 3 physical performance measures in inpatient geriatric rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:105-10.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/57477.17453

Date of Submission: May 01, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jun 29, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Aug 29, 2022
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 06, 2022
• Manual Googling: Aug 08, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Aug 27, 2022 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com