Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 148839

AbstractConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : DE07 - DE12 Full Version

Global Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Antimicrobial Resistance: An Overview


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60138.17668
Amresh Kumar Singh, Nandini Singh, Sushil Kumar, Ankur Kumar

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. PhD Scholar, Department of Zoology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Junior Resident, Department of Microbiology, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Amresh Kumar Singh,
Head and Incharge COVID-19 Lab, Department of Microbiology, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur-273013, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: amresh.sgpgi@gmail.com

Abstract

Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is a condition which occurs, when pathogens evolve and no longer respond to antibiotics, making infections more difficult to treat and leads to death. Apart from the truth that antibiotics have increased the life expectancy of human, AMR is a serious threat. AMR is a major public health threat declared by World Health Organisation (WHO) since 2014. During the different waves of the pandemic, patients with Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) accounted for the majority of hospital admissions, frequently necessitating an antibiotic upon admission. Among hospitalised patients with COVID-19 infection, a major cause of mortality was mainly due to secondary infections, which was due to overuse of antibiotics and poor infection control procedures which may lead to rapid emergence of Multidrug Resistance (MDR). Before COVID-19 pandemic, AMR was estimated to kill around 700,000 people yearly that are predicted to increase upto 10 million by 2050. Before COVID-19 pandemic, there was lower incidence of hospital associated infections across world. AMR was surprisingly prevalent in patients with bacterial co-infections during the first 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. The latest update as per WHO guidance for antibiotic stewardship, which does not recommend antibiotic therapy or prophylaxis for patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 unless signs and symptoms of a bacterial infection. Now, the researchers must consider secondary bacterial infection rate, MDR isolation rate, and high mortality among COVID-19 with secondary infection. This shows the urgent need for surveillance, reinforcement of infection control practices and strict antimicrobial stewardship to combat increasing AMR.

Keywords

Antibiotic stewardship, Coronavirus disease-2019, Multidrug resistant, Nosocomial infection

One of the major concerns to public health in 21st century is AMR, which happens when changes in microorganisms render the medications used to treat diseases less effective (1). The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and subsequent pandemic has placed an immense impact on healthcare systems globally (2). This has required unprecedented responses to control the spread of infection and protect the most vulnerable. A peek under the hood of studies reporting on patients hospitalised with COVID-19 reveals widespread use of antimicrobial therapies as part of the package of clinical care in some countries (3). The COVID-19 epidemic presents further difficulties for antibiotic stewardship tactics and consumption measurements. During the initial wave of the pandemic, COVID-19 patients accounted for the majority of hospital admissions, frequently necessitating an antibiotic prescription upon admission or treatment for superinfection (4).

In a recent research, Cox MJ et al., highlighted a need to prospectively monitor co-infections in patients with COVID-19 to understand whether co-infection affects disease progression and to enable antimicrobial stewardship (5). It is of the utmost importance that the potential of the global pandemic to increase AMR is taken seriously. AMR is a growing problem that has implications for global health and the world economy (3). During the 1918 and subsequent influenza pandemics, Streptococcus pneumoniae and other bacterial superinfection were common causes of mortality and morbidity (6). Prior to emergence of

COVID-19, an estimated 3 million Americans were infected each year with a high-priority antimicrobial resistant pathogen (7),(8).

Several factors constrain the antimicrobial marketplace. Antimicrobials are generally administered for short treatment courses. Older agents remain active against a vast majority of infections. Responsible stewardship practices restrict use of newer agents to AMR infections in which older drugs are inactive. Overly restrictive stewardship may limit uptake of new antimicrobials in favour of cheaper, less effective alternatives (9).

The goal of this article was to identify variables that contribute to AMR, discuss the aspects that prescribers consider when writing an antibiotic prescription and investigation factors that affect the outcomes of improper antimicrobial usage.

AMR: globally

The AMR is a reality that is “far from an apocalyptic fiction,” according to the WHO’s most recent global surveillance report (10). It is occurring right now in every region of the world and has the potential to afflict anyone, of any age, in any country (11). Over the past several decades, antimicrobials have facilitated improvements in medicine. Although, efforts to achieve universal health coverage and the health-related sustainable development target are slowed down by the ongoing emergence of antibiotic resistance, we are still able to treat diseases. A neglected worldwide catastrophe called AMR needs to be addressed immediately (12). AMR caused an estimated 4.95 million (3.62-6.57) deaths in 2019, of which 1.27 million (95 percent UI 0.911-1.71) were directly linked to the disease. As per calculation of the regional all age mortality rate owing to resistance was 27.3 deaths per 100,000 people (20.9-35.3) in western sub-Saharan Africa and 6.55 deaths (4.3-9.4) per 100,000 people in Australasia (1). An estimated 34.8 billion antibiotic doses consumed by humans each year, with worldwide consumption increasing 65% between 2000 and 2015. In UK, one out of five antibiotics are prescribed unnecessarily. In the US, this number upsurges to 1 in 3. Meanwhile, 17% of the substandard or falsified medicines reported to the WHO are antibiotics, which have further contributed to drug resistance. Maximum pharmaceutical companies are no longer making new antibiotics. In current time, half of all antibiotics that are being used were discovered during the 1950s.

Factors Influencing AMR

One of the main causes of the emergence of antibiotics resistance is the irrational use of antibiotics (13). Other factors may include in-experienced medical professionals, inaccurate diagnoses and medical judgments influenced by patient caregivers. Monitoring AMR is essential for spotting new resistance trends, creating mitigation tactics and evaluating their efficacy (14). A number of factors, including social factor, untrained medical practitioner, lack of proper guidelines/Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for antimicrobial therapy, lack of antimicrobial surveillance and lack of new research of new antibiotics are discussed below:

(A) Social factor: Some of the main social reasons causing antibiotic resistance are insufficient access to effective therapies, self-medication and shortage of money to pay for suitable, high-quality medications. Some patients frequently self-medicate despite being aware that using antibiotics improperly might result in resistance (15). Misuse of antibiotics is one of major social factor for increasing AMR.

(B) Untrained/unskilled medical practitioner: Doctor’s disregard for recommended treatments, their ignorance of antibiotics, their lack of training in their use, their lack of access to diagnostic tools, their uncertainty about the diagnosis, pressure from the pharmaceutical industry, their fear of clinical failure, the financial rewards they receive from prescribing antibiotics, and their lack of time to educate their patients, can all have an impact on the course of treatment and contribute to AMR (16).

(C) Lack of antimicrobial surveillance system for AMR: There is a shortage of information on comprehensive population-based surveillance of antibiotic resistance in low and middle-income nations. Due to weak administration of the healthcare system, a lack of health information systems and lack of resources, the problems are significant. Increased antibiotic resistance rates can be brought on by inaccurate data, which also makes it difficult to monitor and map the development of resistance, identify early outbreaks, and establish public health policies to address resistance (17).

(D) Lack of proper guidelines: A local stewardship guideline, which is frequently based on local antibiotic susceptibility data, impacts a clinician’s choice of antimicrobial for their patients. Empiric therapy aims to cover a wide variety of suspicious organisms. As a result, AMR will alter the antimicrobials administered to people with COVID-19. Clinicians are thus faced with competing priorities: prescribing a broad enough spectrum antimicrobial to ensure the organism’s sensitivity while avoiding the unnecessary use of antimicrobials, when a more commonly used or narrower-spectrum antimicrobial would be enough (18).

(E) Lack of research of new antibiotics: According to WHO, efforts to tackle drug resistant diseases are being undermined by declining corporate investment and a lack of innovation in the discovery of new antibiotics (19). AMR research is also expected to have slowed significantly during COVID-19. Staff, as well as diagnostic laboratory equipment and reagents, have been redeployed to COVID-19 research.

Despite the obvious need for additional antimicrobial medicines, no such medications have been developed. In COVID-19, one can observe many factors such as long-term hospital admission, over use of antibiotics, decline in diagnosis processes are also responsible for increase in rate of AMR cases (4). According to a survey conducted in Global Antimicrobial resistance and use Surveillance System (GLASS) countries, showed that majority of the responding nations had declined in the demand for screening (65%; 44/68) and clinical (67%; 46/69) cultures. Many (48/69; 70%) of them described a decrease in their capacity to provide training for laboratory staff, while more than half (42/70; 60%) reported no influence on the processing time of antimicrobial susceptibility test results. A 46% (27/59) and 43% (29/68) also reported decrease in their capacity to conduct molecular screening and quality management activities, respectively (20).

Superinfection and AMR in pre COVID-19 and COVID-19

AMR was a high priority for global public health prior to COVID-19 pandemic. AMR, which is already a complicated subject, must now be tackled in the context of a changing healthcare sector. Many changes occur during COVID-19 in terms of antibiotic usage and superinfection which impact the onset, spread and burden of AMR.

Superinfection and Antimicrobial Usage Before COVID-19 Pandemic

Antibiotics have been enormously successful in improving health outcomes and have aided in the global reduction of under-5 mortality from 216 deaths per 1000 live births in 1950 to 39 deaths per 1000 live births in 2017, as well as an increase in men’s life expectancy at birth from 49-82 years and women’s life expectancy from 54-87 years over at same period (21). Increase in resistance rate for the common antibiotics is very often encountered among common illnesses, such as Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) or different types of diarrhoeas, showed that the world is running out of effective ways to combat these notorious bugs. According to WHO, 33 reporting nations the rate of resistance to ciprofloxacin, an antibacterial often used to treat UTIs, ranged from 8.4-92.9% (22). AMR is on the rise globally, posing a danger to the beneficial effects of antibiotics on health and many low and middle-income nations (LMICs) lack of access to basic medicines (23).

Superinfection and Antimicrobial Usage in COVID-19 Pandemic

Patients who are critically ill and hospitalised are more likely to develop bacterial and fungal superinfection, when they are having risk factors like ageing population, underlying systemic diseases, immunocompromised individuals, long-term systemic corticosteroid use, mechanical ventilation, extended hospital, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stays and can also complicate COVID-19 disease (24). Numerous bacteria, including MDR bacteria were found to be associated with superinfection in COVID-19 patients (25). Whereas Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans, and Candida glabrata were some of the most frequent fungi that have been identified as superinfecting COVID-19 patients (24),(26). Secondary infections were reported in 5-27% of adults infected with SARS-CoV-2 in several hospitals in Wuhan, China, through mid February 2020, including 50-100% of those who died (27). There are various mechanisms such as decrease in immune response against microbes, increased bacterial cohesion, cell death due to viral enzymes etc., by which various bacteria and fungi can cause secondary infections in COVID-19 patients (Table/Fig 1) (28),(29). Prior to the onset of COVID-19 pandemic, drugs that had already been authorised for treating other conditions were quickly repurposed as potential treatments for the COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2. Worldwide, medical professionals suggested using a wide range of drugs to treat these kinds of patients (25). According to data from research on antibiotic use in the treatment of COVID-19 patients, an average of 70% of patients takes antibiotics (30).

Disruption in Clinical Care System due to COVID-19 Pandemic

Global health system has been greatly impacted by COVID-19. Due to this strain, healthcare organisations and governments have been obliged to prioritise medical treatment and postpone everything but the most critical surgeries (31).

Delay in Diagnosis of AMR and its Sequealae

Due to COVID-19, there was a delay in testing for other diseases. A delay in diagnosis of secondary infection caused by Antibiotic Resistant Organisms (AROs) may remain contagious for long-term and hence transmit to others for longer with a delay in diagnosis and effective adequate treatment. For example, in the first quarter of 2020, Tuberculosis (TB) and Multidrug Resistance Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) tests significantly decreased in China (32). COVID-19 also had an impact on vaccination. The number of measles vaccinations decreased by about 50% in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Safety Data Link (33). This decline has occurred throughout the world as nations impose various levels of lockdown. The majority of nations had suspended large polio vaccination programmes, while 25 countries had delayed mass measles vaccine campaigns (34). Another survey on 73 countries by GLASS had showed that more than half of the reporting nations (35/56; 63%) reported increase in overall antibiotic prescription. In particular, 47% (23/49), 57% (27/47) and 40% (18/45) of countries reported increasing usage of WHO access, watch, and reserve antibiotics (20).

Diagnostic Uncertainties

COVID-19 symptoms might be like bacterial pneumonia. When urgent treatment is required, diagnostics used to identify viral from bacterial pneumonia may be inefficient or have turnaround times of hours or days. As a result, many patients admitted with COVID-19 were given antibiotics, often in the absence of microbiological confirmation of the diagnosis.

Lack of Improper Supply Chain of Antibiotic

The burden of ARO related diseases is determined by the quantity and character of infections, as well as the availability, efficacy, and safety of alternate therapies. COVID-19 has the ability to alter all three of these components, either directly or indirectly. As a result, the availability of antibiotics has been disrupted by the pandemic because government led initiatives have included local and international travel restrictions, which generate supply chain delays. Uneven supplies of different antimicrobials across all income settings raised concerns about AMR emergence due to suboptimal antibiotic usage (18).

Global Impact of AMR on Secondary Infection in COVID-19 Pandemic

Over the last two decades, common viral infections have contributed considerably to mortality including both developed and developing countries, and in most situations, deaths are caused by subsequent bacterial infections rather than direct viral harm (35). Before COVID-19, increasing AMR or secondary infection around the world was a major issue to concern.

Many different researches have been done in recent years on AMR and other different secondary infections. A retrospective study in India by Saini V et al., observed bacterial co-infections of Staphylococcus aureus (12.80%), Coagulase negative Staphylococcus (29.40%), Enterococcus spp. (10.80%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (10.80%), Acinetobacter baumannii (10.50%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.20 %), Escherichia coli (21.40%) in total 844 cases (36). A study conducted in USA by Weiner-Lastinger LM et al., showed that 1689 cases of MRSA and 9,910 cases of Clostridioides difficile (CDI) are predominately reported from 3,106 and 3,190 hospitals respectively from January to March 2020 (37). A study in Brazil by Bes TM et al., in 2017 found 2.3% prevalence of MRSA colonisation in individuals from the general community (38). Another study by Karatas M et al., showed the prevalence of secondary infection of Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) producing Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter baumannii among 3532 patients which is 20.76% and 3.49% respectively (39). An observational study by Ntirenganya C et al., showed the prevalence of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella isolates and found that antimicrobial resistance rates were high (Table/Fig 2) (29),(36),(37),(38),(39),(40),(42),(43),(44).

The COVID-19 epidemic is having extensive consequences for many sectors of our healthcare systems. These have thrown multiple layers of AMR surveillance, prevention and control into disarray. Superinfection is significant risk factor for unfavourable outcomes and hospitalised patients with severe illness are more likely to be infected. Rawson TM et al., and Langford BJ et al., conducted meta-analyses and discovered that approximately 75% of hospitalised COVID-19 patients received antibiotics, despite the fact that 3.5% and 8.5% were estimated to have bacterial co-infections on presentation and bacterial/fungal co-infections during admission, respectively (2),(41).

A study by Chowdhary A et al., have found MDR resistance Candida auris in patients infected with COVID-19 (42). A comparative study by Weiner-Lastiger LM et al., showed increase in rate of AMR in comparison with pre COVID-19 (Table/Fig 2). They studied on MRSA infections, CLABSI (central-line-associated bloodstream infection); CAUTI, (catheter-associated urinary tract infection), VAE (ventilator-associated event) and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and found that except CDI all other infections are greater than cases in 2019, which might be attributed to poor management methods (37). Another research by Mahmoudi H, on different bacterial infections on 340 patients showed prevalence of 12.46% (29). In another study by Li J et al., showed the prevalence of secondary infection of A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae and S. maltophilia was 6.8% among a total of 1495 COVID-19 cases (Table/Fig 2) (43). Another study by Khurana S et al., showed secondary infections in 151 (13%) among a total of 1179 patients with overall resistance upto 84% in which majority of the organisms were MDR (44).

Consequences of Rising AMR during COVID-19

The COVID-19 and AMR have a number of negative effects on the health system, as well as on the economy, society and international politics. Due to limited resources and prolonged hospital stays, AMR and other secondary infections have increased. This leads to prolonged treatment delays, hospital epidemics and a shortage of beds, raising ethical concerns regarding the prioritisation of care.

(a) Economic consequences: In developing and underdeveloped countries, where resources are limited, above given problems arises more frequently. Antimicrobial medications are already insufficiently available in these nations, but the rate of AMR is expected to rise 4-7 times faster (45),(46).

Additionally, it puts a financial strain on governments. Due to reduced production as a result of sick days and protracted recovery times, significant AMR related costs are anticipated. AMR’s implications on the labour market are anticipated to have significant cumulative consequences on the world economy, particularly in service sectors that depend on human contact. Stronger labour rights and gender appropriate access to healthcare and alternate arrangements for child and senior care should all be part of a comprehensive AMR strategy that effectively tackles the unequal biological and social effects of AMR (47).

The breaking of international collaboration based on norms during COVID-19 has shown the vulnerability of that cooperation. In order to stop the virus from spreading inside their own borders during the pandemic, many nations disregarded the WHO advice and broke the legally binding International Health Regulations (2005) by prohibiting the export of medical supplies, enforcing severe travel restrictions and violating human rights obligations (48).

(b) Increase in mortality rate: According to a report by CDC, more than 29,400 persons died from antimicrobial resistant diseases frequently linked with healthcare during the first year of the epidemic. Nearly 40% of these COVID-19 infected persons were secondarily infected while in the hospital stay (49).

(c) Emergence of new pattern of resistance: The emergence and spread of drug resistant pathogens that have acquired new resistance mechanisms, leading to AMR, continues to threaten our ability to treat common infections. Especially alarming is the rapid global spread of multi and pan resistant bacteria (also known as “superbugs”) that cause infections that are not treatable with existing antimicrobial medicines such as antibiotics (50).

The clinical pipeline of new antimicrobials is dry from last so many years, only modified salts or congener of old salts are now being tried and used for better efficacy. In 2019 WHO identified 32 antibiotics in clinical development that address the WHO list of priority pathogens, of which only six were classified as innovative. Furthermore, a lack of access to quality antimicrobials remains a major issue (50).

Prevention of AMR

The AMR is a slow-moving issue that affords a rare chance to proactively create treatments to lessen the effects of COVID-19. While COVID-19 response is presently receiving the world’s attention, which is understandable, there is a moral need to reflect on lessons learned and potential for future global health emergencies. There are two options for dealing with the growing problem of antibiotic resistance: either develop new medicines, or utilise existing antibiotics more prudently. Both solutions will be required and useful (51).

(A) Optimising usage of antibiotics: Antibiotic stewardship programmes strive to optimise the use of antibiotics while lowering the risks associated with the development of antibiotic resistance, side-effects and pharmaceutical costs. Antibiotic stewardship tactics reduce the need for antibiotics, therefore national and international recommendations must encourage hospitals to follow local its guidelines to improve de-escalation and treatment strategies (52). COVID-19 targeted antibiotic stewardship treatments have been few thus far, despite their enormous promise in pandemic management by optimising treatment regimens and antibiotic usage (53). The performance of host response biomarkers and patterns of antibiotic prescription among patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 are both in urgent need of further study. It is important to publicly communicate antibiotic stewardship techniques and use them to guide future pandemic responses. These techniques have been demonstrated to successfully reduce the impact of COVID-19 in emergency rooms (54).

(B) Five D’s by antibiotic stewardship program: Antibiotic stewardship is mainly framed by five D’s ie., diagnosis, drug, dose, duration and de-escalation (55). For approaching antibiotic stewardship for COVID-19, all above given factor must be in mind. Diagnosis should be appropriate and there is need of well computerised system with less turnaround time. Right empiric drug should be used with help of selective and cascade reporting of antibiotic susceptibility and provider education, to avoid AMR. Use of right dose based on infection and diagnosis report. Duration of antibiotic use must be taken into consideration; mentality of “longer is better” can be harmful for patient. De-escalation is also very important and must be done by help of post prescription review. Above to provide the greater opportunity for an efficient coordinated response to AMR across areas, world society should deliberately seek for an equally appealing rallying cry (47).

(C) Research and development of newer antibiotics/antimicrobial agents: The AMR sector should make investment in diagnostic infrastructure and adapt their usage for quick identification of both the infection’s cause and any related treatment resistance. The diagnostic difficulties encountered by COVID-19 are typical worries for bloodstream infections, suspected pneumonia and other situations (18). The development of a low-cost, trustworthy, and quick point-of-care test should continue at the current pace. Also there is need of new antibiotics which can effective on broad range of resistant bacteria.

Conclusion

The global threat of AMR will persist even beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of antibacterial agent was seen in alarming rise following the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent data on the prevalence of AMR infections before and after the pandemic should be gathered to determine the dissemination of AMR organisms particularly in developing countries. Antibiotic prescription practices might be improved to reduce the chances of resistance and as a result, improve the clinical outcomes. This is something to consider in the context of AMR, since MDR organisms are developing and pushing us closer to a day when infection caused by these organism will be no longer curable. The awareness and management of infectious agents, as well as the invention of newer, more useful antimicrobials is required on large scale. One of the significant approaches to control AMR is to make investments in improving healthcare systems along with good infection control practices and preparing for such pandemics associated with superinfection. The present epidemic has taught us a valuable lesson about the need of having appropriate, robust and effective reporting and surveillance mechanisms.

Authors contributions: AKS and NS: Review conceptualisation and writing the manuscript. SK: Literature searching, figure preparation, and review writing, review conceptualisation and revision. AK: Literature searching and figure preparation. AKS: Literature searching. NS: Review revision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgement

Authors are grateful to staffs and doctors from the Department of Microbiology and reviewers for their insightful comments.

References

1.
Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Aguilar GR, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Rawson TM, Moore LS, Castro-Sanchez E, Charani E, Davies F, Satta G, et al. COVID-19 and the potential long-term impact on antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrobol Chemoth. 2020;75(7):1681-84. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Antimicrobial resistance in the age of COVID-19. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(6):779. Doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0739-4. PMID: 32433531. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Castro-Lopes A, Correia S, Leal C, Resende I, Soares P, Azevedo A, et al. Increase of antimicrobial consumption in a tertiary care hospital during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Antibiotics. 2021;10(7):778. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Cox MJ, Loman N, Bogaert D, O’Grady J. Co-infections: Potentially lethal and unexplored in COVID-19. The Lancet Microbe. 2020;1(1):e11. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Coronavirus disease 2019, superinfections, and antimicrobial development: What can we expect? Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(10):2736-43. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Jernigan JA, Hatfield KM, Wolford H. Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in U.S. hospitalized patients, 2012-2017. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1309-19. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
O’Neill, Jim. “Review on antimicrobial resistance: Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report and recommendations.” Review on antimicrobial resistance: Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: Final report and recommendations. 2016.
9.
Clancy CJ, Potoski BA, Buehrle D, Nguyen MH. Estimating the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections in the United States using antibiotic prescription data. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6:ofz344. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
World Health Organization; Antimicrobial Resistance. Global Report on Surveillance, (2014); Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/1126 42/1/9789241564748_eng.pdf. [Last accessesd on Sep 20, 2022].
11.
Dharmapalan D, Shet A, Yewale V, Sharland M. High reported rates of antimicrobial resistance in Indian neonatal and pediatric blood stream infections. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017;6(3):e62-e68. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Getahun H, Smith I, Trivedi K, Paulin S, Balkhy HH. Tackling antimicrobial resistance in the COVID-19 pandemic. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2020;98(7):442. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Ghadeer AS, Mayada S, Dana AD, Hebah AI, Al-Motassem MY, Rula MD. A cross-sectional study on knowledge, attitude and behavior related to antibiotic use and resistance among medical and non-medical university students in Jordan. African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2012;6(10):763-70. [crossref]
14.
Baraka MA, Alboghdadly A, Alshawwa S, Elnour AA, Alsultan H, Alsalman T, et al. Perspectives of healthcare professionals regarding factors associated with Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) and their consequences: A cross sectional study in Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Antibiotics. 2021;10(7)878.0. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Owusu-Ofori AK, Darko E, Danquah CA, Agyarko-Poku T, Buabeng KO. Self-medication and antimicrobial resistance: A survey of students studying healthcare programmes at a tertiary institution in Ghana. Front Public Health. 2021;8;9:706290. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Md Rezal RS, Hassali MA, Alrasheedy AA, Saleem F, Md Yusof FA, Godman B, et al. Physicians’ knowledge, perceptions and behaviour towards antibiotic prescribing: A systematic review of the literature. Expert review of anti-infective therapy. 2015;13(5):665-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Iskandar K, Molinier L, Hallit S, Sartelli M, Hardcastle TC, Haque M, et al. Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: A scatteIred picture. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021;10:63. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Knight GM, Glover RE, McQuaid CF, Olaru ID, Gallandat K, Leclerc QJ, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and COVID-19: Intersections and implications. Elife. 2021;10:e64139. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Lack of new antibiotics threatens global efforts to contain dug-resistant infections. https://www.who.int/news/item/17-01-2020-lack-of-new-antibiotics-threatens global-efforts-to-contain-drug-resistant-infections. [Last accessed on July 23, 2022].
20.
Tomczyk S, Taylor A, Brown A, de Kraker MEA, El-Saed A, Alshamrani M, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the surveillance, prevention and control of antimicrobial resistance: A global survey. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(11):3045-58. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Dicker D, Nguyen G, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality and life expectancy, 1950-2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. The lancet. 2018;392(10159):1684-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
World Health Organization; Record number of countries contributes data revealing disturbing rates of antimicrobial resistance, 1 June 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/news/item/01-06-2020-record-number-of-countries-contribute-data-revealing-disturbing-rates-of-antimicrobial-resistance. (Last accessed on 2022 October 25).
23.
Laxminarayan R, Matsoso P, Pant S, Brower C, Røttingen JA, Klugman K, et al. Access to effective antimicrobials: A worldwide challenge. Lancet. 2016;387(10014):168-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Nag VL, Kaur N. Superinfections in COVID-19 patients: Role of antimicrobials. Dubai Medical Journal. 2021;4(2):117-26. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Lansbury L, Lim B, Baskaran V, Lim WS. Co-infections in people with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2020;81(2):266-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Heard KL, Hughes S, Mughal N, Moore LS. COVID-19 and fungal superinfection. The Lancet Microbe. 2020;1(3):e107. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497-06. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Hendaus MA, Jomha FA. COVID-19 induced superimposed bacterial infection. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. 2021;39(11):4185-91. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Mahmoudi H. Bacterial co-infections and antibiotic resistance in patients with COVID-19. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2020;15:Doc35.
30.
Kadri SS, Demirkale CY, Sun J, Busch LM, Strich JR, Rosenthal N, et al. Real-world inpatient use of medications repurposed for Coronavirus Disease 2019 in United States Hospitals, March-May 2020. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;8(2):ofaa616. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Wang Z, Wang J, He J. Active and effective measures for the care of patients with cancer during the COVID-19 spread in China. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(5):631-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Liu Q, Lu P, Shen Y, Li C, Wang J, Zhu L, et al. Collateral impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on tuberculosis control in Jiangsu Province, China. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(3):542-44. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Santoli JM, Lindley MC, DeSilva MB, Kharbanda EO, Daley MF, Galloway L, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on routine pediatric vaccine ordering and administration-United States, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(19):591-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
UNICEF. Over 13 million children did not receive any vaccines at all even before COVID-19 disrupted global immunization. 2020 April 24. https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/over-13-million-children-did-not-receive-any-vaccines-all-even-covid-19-disrupted.
35.
Adebisi YA, Alaran AJ, Okereke M, Oke GI, Amos OA, Olaoye OC, et al. COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance: A review. Infect Dis (Auckl). 2021;14:11786337211033870. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Saini V, Jain C, Singh NP, Alsulimani A, Gupta C, Dar SA, et al. Paradigm shift in antimicrobial resistance pattern of bacterial isolates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(8):954. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Weiner-Lastinger LM, Pattabiraman V, Konnor RY, Patel PR, Wong E, Xu SY, et al. The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare-associated infections in 2020: A summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43(1):12-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Bes TM, Martins RR, Perdigão L, Mongelos D, Moreno L, Moreno A, et al. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in individuals from the community in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2018;60:e58. [crossref] [PubMed]
39.
Karatas¸ M, Yas¸ ar-Duman M, Tünger A, Çilli F, Aydemir S¸, Özenci V, et al. Secondary bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance in COVID-19: Comparative evaluation of pre-pandemic and pandemic-era, A retrospective single center study. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021;20(1):51. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Ntirenganya C, Manzi O, Muvunyi CM, Ogbuagu O. High prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among common bacterial isolates in a tertiary healthcare facility in Rwanda. Am J Trop Med Hyg. (2015);92(4):865-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Langford BJ, So M, Raybardhan S, Leung V, Soucy JR, Westwood D, et al. Antibiotic prescribing in patients with COVID-19: Rapid review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(4):520-31.[crossref] [PubMed]
42.
Chowdhary A, Tarai B, Singh A, Sharma A. Multidrug-resistant Candida auris infections in critically ill coronavirus disease patients, India, April-July 2020. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(11):2694-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Li J, Wang J, Yang Y, Cai P, Cao J, Cai X, et al. Etiology and antimicrobial resistance of secondary bacterial infections in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9(1):153. [crossref] [PubMed]
44.
Khurana S, Singh P, Sharad N, Kiro VV, Rastogi N, Lathwal A, et al. Profile of co- infections & secondary infections in COVID-19 patients at a dedicated COVID-19 facility of a tertiary care Indian hospital: Implication on antimicrobial resistance. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021;39(2):147-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
45.
Hoffman SJ, Outterson K. What will it take to address the global threat of antibiotic resistance? J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43:7. [crossref] [PubMed]
46.
Wilson LA, Rogers Van Katwyk S, Fafard P, Viens AM, Hoffman SJ. Lessons learned from COVID-19 for the post-antibiotic future. Global Health. 2020;16(1):94. [crossref] [PubMed]
47.
Wenham C, Smith J, Morgan R. COVID-19: The gendered impacts of the outbreak. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):846-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
48.
World Health Organization; International Health Regulations, WHA 58.3, 2 nd edn. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2005. Available from: https://www.who.int/ publications/i/item/9789241580410. (Last accessed on 2022 September 20).
49.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; COVID-19 & Antimicrobial Resistance. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/covid19.html. (Last accessed on 2022 October 12).
50.
World Health Organization; Antimicrobial resistance; 17 November 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance. (Last accessed on 2022 October 19).
52.
Glasziou P, Dartnell J, Biezen R, Morgan M, Manski-Nankervis JA. Antibiotic stewardship: A review of successful, evidence-based primary care strategies. Aust J Gen Pract. (2022) 51(1-2):15-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
52.
Charani E, Cooke J, Holmes A. Antibiotic stewardship programmes-what’s missing? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(11):2275-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
53.
Mazdeyasna H, Nori P, Patel P, Doll M, Godbout E, Lee K, et al. Antimicrobial stewardship at the core of COVID-19 response efforts: Implications for sustaining and building programs. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2020;22(9):23. [crossref] [PubMed]
54.
Pulia MS, Wolf I, Schulz LT, Pop-Vicas A, Schwei RJ, Lindenauer PK, et al. COVID- 19: An emerging threat to antibiotic stewardship in the emergency department. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(5):1283-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
55.
Goebel MC, Trautner BW, Grigoryan L. The five Ds of outpatient antibiotic stewardship for urinary tract infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021;34(4):e0000320.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60138.17668

Date of Submission: Sep 08, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Oct 18, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Nov 05, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 10, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 15, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Nov 04, 2022 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com