Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 162630

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : EC22 - EC25 Full Version

Histopathological Changes of Placenta in Maternal Hypertensive Disorders and its Association with Birth Weight: A Case-control Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/60341.17615
Nimisha Sharma, Namrata Kahlon, Mitasha Singh, Ananya Jindal, Mukta Pujani, Asim Das

1. Associate Professor, Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Bank, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India. 4. STS Student, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India. 6. Dean and Professor, Department of Physiology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Namrata Kahlon,
Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
E-mail: kahlonnamrata@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: One of the most common complications during pregnancy is hypertension. It leads to pathological changes which reduce the placental blood flow. Hypertensive disorders are strongly associated with foetal growth restriction, prematurity, lower foetal birth weights and contribute largely to perinatal mortality and morbidity.

Aim: To study the histomorphological changes of placenta in cases of maternal hypertensive disorders and compare it with normal controls as well as find out its association with neonatal birth weight.

Materials and Methods: A case-control study was conducted at the Department of Pathology of a Tertiary Care Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India. Duration of the study was two months from July to August 2018. This study is a part of Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Short Term Studentship (STS) scheme for MBBS students. Control group was formed by 30 placenta of full term deliveries without any complications and 30 placenta of the females presenting with hypertensive pregnancies formed the case group. Specimens of placenta were studied in detail for morphological and histological changes. Neonatal Birth weight was recorded just after delivery of all the cases and controls. Analysis of statistical difference between the means of both groups was performed using student unpaired t-test. The data obtained was entered in Microsoft excel sheet and statistically analysed using Epi Info version 7.

Results: Mean maternal age for cases was 28.60 years and controls were 25.23 years. This association was found to be significant. Mean for gestational weeks at the time of delivery was 34.93 weeks in cases and 37.20 weeks in controls (p-value <0.0001). Average placental weight in cases was 410.20 grams and in controls was 480.80 grams (p-value <0.001). Histopathological changes comprised of syncytial knot formation, cytotrophoblasts proliferation, proliferation of endothelial lining of capillaries, stromal fibrosis, calcification, hyalinisation of villi and infarction were comparatively more frequent in cases (n=30). Mean neonatal birth weight was found to be 2809.67±128.32 grams in control group as compared 2427.67±152.22 grams in cases (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion: During pregnancy significant histomorphological changes in placenta are caused due to hypertensive disorders which lead to harmful and severe foetal outcomes. A valuable insight into the mechanism of placental dysfunction can be achieved through a detailed examination after delivery.

Keywords

Calcification, Hypertension, Infarction, Placenta, Pregnancy

Hypertension is one of the common disorders encountered in pregnancy leading to significant morbidity and mortality (1). Hypertension, hemorrhage and infection: this deadly triad results in large number of maternal and foetal deaths (2). Chronic hypertension with superimposed Preeclampsia (PE) and gestational hypertension complicate up to 10% of deliveries and form most important cause of disease and mortality, according to the classification of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG) (3).

Placenta plays a central role in pregnancy. It plays a vital role in the progress of the foetus in utero and thus known as the mirror of maternal and foetal status (4). The pathology of the placenta gives the precise estimate of an infant’s prenatal journey (5). Examination of the placenta and umbilical line is important to recognise what is happening to the foetus (3). A number of histological changes occur in preeclamptic/eclamptic placentas. Some of them are infarcts, increased syncytial knots, subchorionic fibrin deposition, calcification, hypo vascularity of the villi, cytotrophoblastic proliferation, thickening of the trophoblastic membrane, obliterative enlarged endothelial cells in the foetal capillaries, and atherosis of the spinal arteries in the placenta bed (3).

Pregnancy Induced Hypertension (PIH) has adverse effects on the health of foetus through its harmful effects on the placenta (5). Poor placentation and endothelial dysfunction are the characteristic features of PE. It carries an increased risk of progression to eclampsia. Possibility of convulsion increases leading to complications, even mother and foetal deaths (6).

The present study was undertaken to analyse the histomorphological changes in the placentas of normal and hypertensive mothers and to study its association with birth weight.

Material and Methods

A case control study was conducted at the Department of Pathology of a Tertiary Care hospital in Faridabad, Haryana, India, from July and August 2018. This study was conducted under the Indian Council of Medical Research STS scheme for MBBS students and with the permission of the Institutional Ethics Committee of the College (134/A/11/16/Academics/MC/2016/104 dated 18.06.2018).

Control group was formed by 30 placenta of full term deliveries without any complications and 30 placenta of the females presenting with hypertensive pregnancies composed the case group (Blood Pressure ranged 140/90 mmHg or above with/without oedema and/or proteinuria and convulsions).

Inclusion criteria:

Cases: Placenta of Pregnant women presenting with hypertensive pregnancies, between 20-35 years of age, having one foetus (live) in the duration of 34-40 weeks of gestation delivered only through caesarean section were included.

Control: Placenta of Pregnant women presenting with uncomplicated full term deliveries, between 20-35 years of age, having one foetus (live) in the duration of 34-40 weeks of gestation delivered only through caesarean section were included.

Exclusion criteria: Women suffering from hypertension before pregnancy, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, anemia, cardiac disease, abruptio placentae, multiple pregnancies, jaundice and maternal malnutrition were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Immediately after delivery, the placenta including umbilical cord and membranes were collected. Specimen were submitted immersed in 10 % formalin from operation theatre and processed immediately.

Gross examination: Placenta was washed with water and weighed in grams after completely draining blood from it. Formalin fixation was done next. Measuring tape was used to record the placental diameter in centimeters. Physical features like general shape and gross abnormalities were recorded. Gross abnormalities were quantified using semi quantitative methods. This was further confirmed by microscopic examination. Placenta were cut in two equal halves along maximum diameter and then further cut in small pieces. One section from central area and one from peripheral area were taken. Some sections were taken from abnormal lesions. These sections were stained using Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stain. From each section a hundred villi were counted and histological changes present in them were presented as percentage. Bedside blood pressure measurement and brief clinical history was taken of all the cases and controls. Neonatal birth weight was recorded just after delivery of all the cases and controls.

Statistical Analysis

The data obtained was entered in Microsoft excel sheet and statistically analysed using Epi Info version 7. The statistical analysis was done using student unpaired t-test. Statistical significance was set at p-value 0.05.

Results

Data of females attending Outpatient Department (OPD) antenatal clinic during two months (research period) was collected. Analysis showed that out of 1780 females screened, 6.9% reported positive for PIH. Mean maternal age for cases was 28.60 years and controls was 25.23 years. This association was found to be significant. Mean for gestational weeks at the time of delivery was 34.93 weeks in cases and 37.20 weeks in controls (p-value <0.0001) which is statistically significant.

Both systolic and diastolic blood pressures measured were significantly associated in cases and the control group (Table/Fig 1).

Of the thirty cases, 53% were tested positive for proteinuria and 50% for oedema in extremities. None of the controls presented with these findings (Table/Fig 2).

Convulsions were observed among four cases which belonged to case group (4/30=13.3%). Eclampsia was diagnosed among 25% of cases with pre-eclampsia (4/16). Average placental weight in cases was 410.20 grams and in controls was 480.80 grams. This association was highly significant (p-value <0.001).

Histopathological changes comprising of syncytial knot formation, cytotrophoblasts proliferation, proliferation of endothelial lining of capillaries, stromal fibrosis, calcification, hyalinisation of villi and infarction were comparatively more frequent in cases than in control [Table/Fig-3,4]. All the findings were statistically significant.

Mean neonatal birth weight (Table/Fig 2) was found to be 2809.67±128.32 grams in control group as compared 2427.67±152.22 grams in cases (p-value <0.001).

Discussion

Placenta plays the role of a bridge between mother and foetus. Healthy placenta leads to a healthy pregnancy. Its histomorphological examination forms an essential role in determining etiopathogenesis and mechanism of toxaemic pregnancies. This helps the obstetrician to manage its consequences and fix the complication to great extent (7).

In the present study, mean maternal age for cases was 28.60 years and controls were 25.23 years. Gaur S et al., Sankar KD et al., and Saleh RA et al., also noted similar findings (4),(8),(9). Gaur S et al., and Saleh RA et al., did not find statistically significant correlation in their studies (4),(9); which is in contrast to findings of present study and study done by Sankar KD et al., where significant association was found (8). The mean gestational age in the present study was 34.93 weeks in cases and 37.20 weeks in control group. Age in cases was lower than control group. Gestational age was reported to be 36.42±2.69 weeks in PE and 38.20±2.11 weeks in control group by Gaur S et al., (4). Statistically significant association (p<0.001) in gestational age was reported in the present study and other studies (4),(9),(10). Reduced uteroplacental circulation leading to foetal hypoxia can be one of the possible explanations (4).

The mean placental weight was less in cases (410.20 grams) when compared to control group (480.80 grams) in the present study. The mean placental weight of hypertensive pregnancies was observed to be 409±88.69 g whereas, 581±91.38 g in controls by Porwal V et al., (11). Similar findings have been reported by Mallik GB et al., & Londhe PS et al., (12),(13). Salmani D et al., observed placental weight to be less in PE (395.15±63.40) and eclampsia (382.35±75.46) when compared with controls (519.80±59.23) (14). Placental weight was found to be less in preeclamptic group in comparison to control group in study done by Samal R et al.,; Verma E and Kalra R (7),(15). Cibilis LA observed similar findings and concluded that an underlying pathological process was interfering with the normal growth of placenta (16). Placentae were reported to be smaller in PE when compared to uncomplicated pregnancies by Fox H (17). The placentae were lighter in PIH (405.2 gm) as compared to control (489.1 gm) and inverse relation was observed between weight and grade of PIH by Kambale T et al., (18).

In the present study, 13 cases (43.3%) had Syncytial knot formation when compared with controls. Syncytial knot formation in placental villi reflects maturity of the placenta. They may be due to placental insufficiency (11). Syncytial knot density showed statistically significant difference between PE (16.78±2.42) and control group (8.95±0.79) in study done by Gaur S et al., (4). Porwal V et al., found more number of syncytial knots in study group (93.33%) in comparison to controls (6.67 %) (11). Eclampsia (100%) and severe PIH (84%) cases showed knot count increase in study done by Kurdukar MD et al., (19). All cases of severe PIH and eclampsia revealed greater than 30% syncytial knots when viewed under low power in study done by Kambale T et al., (18). Majumdar S et al., observed similar findings (20).

The purpose and development of syncytial knots is yet to become fully clear. They are thought to be part of a degenerative phenomenon i.e., change due to ageing, a syncytial hyperplasia and trophoblastic ischaemia or hypoxia. Reduced perfusion result in numerous syncytial knots (4). Reduced foetal blood flow through the villi in toxaemia cases and normal aging process results in stromal fibrosis (4). In the present study, stromal fibrosis was seen in 3 cases (10%) and 2 controls (6.7 %). Porwal V et al., found a higher percentage of stromal fibrosis (63.33%) in the study group (11).

Calcification is a sign of placental ageing or maturation (11). In the present study, 11 cases (36.7%) and one control (3.3%) had presence of calcification. Porwal V et al., found 60% calcification in normal placenta (11). Goswami P et al., observed 66% overall incidence of calcification in PIH cases (21). Dutta DK et al., (22) observed presence of calcification in 12.5% cases of normal pregnancy (4 out of 32) and 44.3% of PIH group (26 out of 59 cases). Of the 50 cases of normal pregnancy 8% i.e., four cases and 14.3% i.e., 7 of 49 cases were observed with calcification in study done by Kurdukar MD et al., (19). Fox H had included cases who delivered before term in his study and found the incidence of calcification was lower in PIH compared to normal group (17). Kambale T et al., found 12 out of 45 (26.6%) placentae of PIH showed calcification out of this 4 (100%) cases belong to eclampsia, 5 (33.3%) cases belong to severe PIH, and 3 (11.5%) cases belong to mild PIH (18). Hence, the authors concluded that the incidence of placental calcification increases as the severity of the hypertension increase.

Placental infarction denotes an area of ischemic villous necrosis secondary to thrombotic occlusion of the maternal uteroplacental blood vessels (11). It is seen in pregnancies complicated by PIH. In the present study 10 cases (33.3%) had presence of infarction whereas no controls showed infarction. Major difference was observed while comparing presence of infarction in control and cases (p-value 0.001). Significant infarction was seen in hypertensive cases by Porwar V et al., (>5% surface area involved in 40% cases in study group), Kambale T et al., (increase in incidence of infarction in PIH group 28.8%), Das B et al., Udainia A et al.,; Narsimha A et al., (11),(18),(23),(24),(25). Placental infarction was found among 46% of cases and 10% of controls in study done by Sammadar A et al., (26).

Mean neonatal birth weight was found to be 2809.67±128.32 grams in control group as compared to 2427.67±152.22 grams in cases (p-value <0.001) in our study. Gore CR et al., (2853±320 gm, 2516±385 gm) and Kambale T et al., (2739.7g, 2079.6 g) observed mean birth weight of babies in PIH group was lower when compared with control group [2,18]. Similar to our findings Majumdar S; Kurdukar MD et al., and Shevade S et al., found foetal birth weights were lower in cases of PE (19),(20),(27). Mean birth weight of newborns to hypertensive and normotensive mothers was found to be 2464 g and 2847 g, respectively in study done by Sammadar A et al., (26). In PIH, due to maternal vasospasm the blood flow from maternal utero-placenta is decreased. This results in indirect constriction of foetal stem arteries. Such babies are mostly small for date (2).

In the present study, cytotrophoblastic proliferation was observed more in cases when compared to controls i.e., 13 cases (43.3%) and 3 controls (10%). Findings of the present study are comparable to study done by Kambale T et al., who observed that the percentage of cytotrophoblastic proliferation of villi (>20%) increased in the placenta in all the severe PIH and eclampsia cases as compared to the normal group (18). Kartheek BVS et al., recorded abnormal cytotrophoblastic proliferation in 36.36% of hypertensive pregnancies as compared to normal ones (28).

Limitation(s)

One of the major limitation of our study was its small sample size. This was due to time specification of two months to conduct the project by ICMR. Hence, the results cannot be generalised for larger population. To establish a clear association and assess the various parameters involved, studies need to be conducted on larger sample size. Hence, the earlier the disorder is diagnosed and confirmed, the better the foetal and maternal outcomes (29).

Conclusion

During pregnancy significant histomorphological changes in placenta are caused due to hypertensive disorders which lead to harmful and severe foetal outcomes. The villous lesion in hypertensive placenta like cytotrophoblasts proliferation, proliferation of endothelial lining of capillaries, stromal fibrosis, calcification, hyalinisation of villi and infarction were found to be statistically significant in cases. A valuable insight into the mechanism of placental dysfunction can be achieved through a detailed examination after delivery.

Acknowledgement

Sincere thanks to the Indian Council for Medical Research for its support through its STS program for undergraduate medical students (2018-02779).

References

1.
Rajyalakshmi S, Vani BS, Jijiya Bai P. Placental pathology in different degrees of Pregnancy Induced Hypertension (PIH). Trop Path Micro. 2019;5(12):988-96. Doi: 10.17511 jopm.2019.i12.04. [crossref]
2.
Gore CR, Pandey A, Shetty A, Rao R, Paranjape S. A study on histopathological changes in placenta in pre-eclampsia/eclampsia: A case-control study in tertiary care centre, western India. Ind J Pathol Oncol. 2018;5(3):385-90. [crossref]
3.
Sawsan H. Histopathological changes in placentas due to pregnancy-induced hypertension and gestational diabetes compared with normal term placenta. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 2021;12:844-49.
4.
Gaur S, Sangeetha N, Bai S. Histomorphometrical study of placental villi in preeclampsia: A case-control study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2022;16(7):42-46. [crossref]
5.
Donthi D, Malik P, Mohamed A, Kousar A, Subramanian RA, Manikyam UK. An objective histopathological scoring system for placental pathology in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Cureus. 2020;12(10):e11104. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Hypertension in pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1122-31.
7.
Samal R, Vaithy AK, Sowmya S. Histomorphological analysis of placental changes of pre-eclampsia patients in a tertiary care hospital of Puducherry. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9:2299-304. [crossref]
8.
Sankar KD, Bhanu PS, Ramalingam K, Kiran S, Ramakrishna BA. Histomorphological and morphometrical changes of placental terminal villi of normotensive and preeclamptic mothers. Anat Cell Biol. 2013;46 (4):285-90. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Saleh RA, Dkhil MA. Structural changes of placenta in preeclamptic patients: Light and electron microscopic study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2008;38(3):219-25.
10.
Raio L, Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Nelle M, Dürig P, Schneider H. The thick heterogeneous (jellylike) placenta: A strong predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome. Prenatal Diagnosis: Published in Affiliation With the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis. 2004;24 (3):182-88. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Porwal V, Jain D, Gupta S, Khandelwal S, Kasliwal N. Spectrum of placental changes in pregnancy induced hypertension. Annal Pathol Lab Med. 2017;4(1):A69-76. [crossref]
12.
Mallik GB, Mirchandani JJ, Chitra S. Placenta in intrauterine growth retardation. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 1979;29:805-10.
13.
Londhe PS, Mane AB. Placenta morphometry in relation to birth weight of full term newborn babies. National Journal of Integrated Research in Medicine. 2012;3:67-72.
14.
Salmani D, Purushothaman S, Somashekara SC, Gnanagurudasan E, Sumangaladevi K, Harikishan R, et al. Study of structural changes in placenta in pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014;5:352-55. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Verma E, Kalra R. Prenatal brain damage and placental infarction-an autopsy study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;37:555-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Cibilis LA. The placenta and newborn infant with hypertension conditions. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1974;118:256-70. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Fox H. Pathology of the Placenta. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1978.
18.
Kambale T, Iqbal B, Ramraje S, Swaimul K, Salve S. Placental morphology and fetal implications in pregnancies complicated by pregnancy-induced hypertension. Med J DY Patil Univ. 2016;9:341-47. [crossref]
19.
Kurdukar MD, Deshpande NM, Shete SS, Zawar MP. Placenta in PIH. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2007;50:493-97.
20.
Majumdar S. Study of placenta in normal and hypertensive pregnancies. J Anat Soc India. 2005;54:34-38.
21.
Goswami P, Lata H, Memon S, Khaskheli LB. Excessive placental calcification observed in PIH patients and its relation to fetal outcome. JLUMHS. 2012;11(03):143-48.
22.
Dutta DK, Dutta B. Study of human placentae associated with preeclampsia and essential hypertension in relation to foetal outcome. J Obstet Gynecol India. 1989;39:757-63.
23.
Das B, Dutta D, Chakraborthy S, Nath P. Placental morphology in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and its correlation with fetal outcome. J Obstet and Gynecol India. 1996;46(1):40-46.
24.
Udainia A, Bhagwat SS, Mehta CD. Relation between placental surface area, infarction and foetal distress in pregnancy induced hypertension with its clinical relevance. J Anat Soc Ind. 2004;53:27-30.
25.
Narsimha A, Vasudeva DS. Spectrum of changes in placenta in toxaemia of pregnancy. IAPM. 2011;54:15-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Samaddar A, Roy UG, Saha I, Mangal S. Histopathological changes in placenta in pregnancy-induced hypertensive patients and correlation with fetal outcome- A tertiary care hospital study. Biomed Biotechnol Res J. 2021;5:440-45.
27.
Shevade S, Arole V, Bharambe V, Paranjape V. Placental morphology and foetal outcome in preeclampsia and normotensive pregnancies. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS). 2015;14(4):11-15.
28.
Kartheek BVS, Atla B, Prasad U, Namballa U, Prabhakula S. A study of placental morphology and correlation with colour doppler ultrasonography, maternal and neonatal outcome in high risk pregnancies. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6:3364-69. Doi: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20184047. [crossref]
29.
Bhojwani K, Agrawal A. Study of histopathological changes in the placenta in preeclampsia. Cureus. 2022;14 (10):e30347.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/60341.17615

Date of Submission: Sep 25, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 17, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Feb 03, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 29, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 01, 2023 (18%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com