Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 125336

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : March | Volume : 17 | Issue : 3 | Page : OC05 - OC08 Full Version

Effect of Long-term Oxygen Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Prospective Clinical Study


Published: March 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/62248.17581
PJ Sruthi Raghunath, Poriyanganattu Thankappan Anandan, N Safreena Mohamed

1. Senior Resident, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College, Kollam, Kerala, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
N Safreena Mohamed,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
E-mail: safreena.mohamed@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Long-Term Oxygen Therapy (LTOT) has the potential to improve the mortality and morbidity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients.

Aim: To assess the effect of LTOT on the Quality of Life (QoL) in stable COPD patients with severe resting hypoxemia.

Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kozhikode, Kerala, India on stable COPD patients with severe hypoxemia who were newly initiated on home LTOT for ≥15 hours per day. Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade of dyspnoea, frequency of exacerbations and adherence to treatment on LTOT were studied. Total of 60 patients were followed-up for one year. Significance of mean was tested using paired t-test and association between qualitative variables was tested using Chi-square test. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Out of all, 7 patients died during the study period and 53 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean total St.George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores at 3, 6 and 12 months improved to 53.73±13.2, 53.97±13.22 and 54.63±13.16, respectively, from a baseline score of 72.51±8.88. At the end of 12 months of LTOT, 22 (41.51%) patients did not have exacerbations and 31 (58.49%) patients had exacerbations. There was no statistically significant improvement in dyspnoea after one year of LTOT. Among the 53 patients, who completed one year follow-up, 36 (67.92%) participants were adherent and remaining 17 (32.07%) participants were non adherent to LTOT.

Conclusion: The LTOT improves the HRQoL in stable COPD patients with severe hypoxemia. Use of domiciliary oxygen for atleast 15 hours per day can reduce the number of COPD exacerbations.

Keywords

Adherence, Exacerbation, Quality of life

Long-Term Oxygen Therapy (LTOT), defined as oxygen use for atleast 15 hours per day in chronically hypoxemic patients, is the cornerstone of treatment in stable COPD patients with severe resting hypoxemia. Severe hypoxemia is defined as meeting either of the following criteria: 1) PaO2≤55 mmHg or oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2)≤88%, with or without hypercapnia; or 2) PaO2=56-59 mmHg or SpO2=89% along with one of the following- peripheral oedema, polycythemia (haematocrit ≥ 55%), or P pulmonale (1). LTOT use in hypercapnic respiratory patients with COPD does not lead to increased morbidity or mortality. Assessment of need for LTOT has to be done when the patient is clinically stable and free from exacerbations, i.e., clinical and arterial blood gas assessments are to be done on two occasions, atleast three weeks apart (2).

The beneficial effects of LTOT in COPD are manifold. In addition to a clear survival benefit, LTOT improves exercise capacity, pulmonary haemodynamics and secondary polycythemia. It has the potential to improve neuropsychological function and sleep quality (3),(4),(5). The two landmark studies on LTOT, Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial (NOTT) and British Medical Research Council (BMRC) trial have demonstrated a clear survival benefit in severely hypoxemic COPD patients on LTOT [6,7]. The NOTT also concluded that those patients with severely impaired QoL and brain dysfunction were most likely to benefit from oxygen therapy.

There are only a few longitudinal studies that have studied the impact of LTOT on the HRQoL in COPD patients with severe hypoxemia, possibly due to the ethical issues in obtaining a placebo control group as well as the logistic difficulties of long-term studies (8),(9). Limited studies have been done in the Indian setting to assess the effect of LTOT in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure. A retrospective study by Karthikeyan G et al., assessed the reduction in pulmonary artery systolic pressure with LTOT in 41 patients who had pulmonary hypertension due to chronic lung disease and found that response was better with post tuberculosis obstructive airway disease and interstitial lung diseases than with COPD. However, QoL assessment was not done in that particular study (10).

The present study was carried out to assess the effect of long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy on the QoL, grade of dyspnoea and frequency of exacerbations in stable COPD patients with severe resting hypoxemia. Adherence to LTOT and factors responsible for poor adherence were also studied.

Material and Methods

This was a prospective observational clinical study conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kozhikode, Kerala, India from January 2019 to September 2020. Institutional Ethics Committee clearance was obtained from hospital (GMCKKD/RP2019/IEC65) and written informed consent from all patients.

Inclusion criteria: Stable COPD patients who were on standard medical management and newly initiated on home LTOT ≥15 hours/day, for severe resting hypoxemia as per the standard criteria were included in the study (1).

Exclusion criteria: Patients on intermittent home oxygen therapy only for exertional desaturation, nocturnal only oxygen therapy, concomitant use of home non invasive ventilator for hypercapnic respiratory failure at screening visit, recent COPD exacerbation within four weeks, current smokers, patients with significant lung diseases other than COPD, active tuberculosis, malignancy and unstable cardiovascular disease were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size was calculated as 48, based on a previous study by Eaton T et al., that assessed the improvement in QoL in patients on LTOT (8). Sample size ‘n’ was calculated based on the formula:

n=(zα+zβ)2SD2/d2

where SD=standard deviation=7.3, Zα is 1.96 for an alpha error of 5%, Zβ is 0.84 for a beta error of 20% and d is the effect size, taken as 3.

Study Procedure

At enrollment, detailed history was taken and frequency of exacerbations was recorded from patient history and medical records. All patients were prescribed atleast 15 hours of home oxygen therapy using electrically driven oxygen concentrators. Baseline assessment included mMRC dyspnoea score, arterial blood gas PaO2 and PaCO2 and six-minute walk test. QoL assessment was done using SGRQ (11). This questionnaire has three subscales or domains, one each for symptoms, activity, and the impact of disease on daily life. SGRQ scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating more limitation. The total SGRQ score as well as scores for each domain was calculated.

Patients who were offered LTOT were educated regarding its use and safety measures to be taken. Strict avoidance of smoking was insisted upon and risk of fire hazard was also explained. A minimum of 15 hours in all patients and for greater duration, upto 24 hours of oxygen use, on a case-by-case basis, was advised, using a home oxygen concentrator titrated to keep SpO2 ≥90%. The patients’ concerns regarding home oxygen use were addressed. All patients were asked to keep a diary to record the exacerbations, hours of use of LTOT per day and to record the reasons, if it was not being used for the recommended duration.

The study subjects came for follow-up visits at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. During each follow-up visit, QoL was assessed and frequency of exacerbations recorded. Adherence to LTOT and reasons for non compliance were recorded. Adherence to LTOT was defined as oxygen usage for atleast 15 hours duration per day. The QoL and frequency of exacerbations were compared with the baseline characteristics recorded during the first visit and each follow-up visit. SGRQ scores before LTOT, after 3 months, 6 months and 12 months of LTOT were considered as the primary outcome variable. The secondary outcome variables included the number of exacerbations and mMRC dyspnoea score at 12 months follow-up.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analysis was carried out by mean and standard deviation estimation for quantitative variables and frequency and proportion for categorical variables. Significance of mean was tested using paired t-test and association between qualitative variables was tested using Chi-square test. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22.0 was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 60 patients were enrolled in the study. Among them, 7 patients died during the study period. Five out of the seven patients died within the first 3 months and did not report for follow-up. Two patients died during the 4th and 5th months of the study, respectively. Hence, 53 patients completed 12 months of follow-up and were included in the final analysis. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics are given in (Table/Fig 1).

A comparison of the SGRQ scores for symptoms, activity and impact domains as well as total scores at baseline and follow-up visits was made using paired t-test. There was a statistically significant improvement in all the SGRQ domains at 3 months of LTOT and in the symptoms and activity domains at 12 months (Table/Fig 2).

The number of exacerbations at one year follow-up was compared with the number of exacerbations in the preceding year in the 53 patients who completed 12 months of follow-up using the Chi-square test (Table/Fig 3). There was a statistically significant reduction in the number of exacerbations on using LTOT. There was no significant improvement in mMRC dyspnoea grade at 12 months of LTOT when compared with the baseline grades when compared using Chi-square test (Table/Fig 4).

Among the 53 patients who completed one year follow-up, 36 (67.92%) participants were adherent to LTOT (Table/Fig 5). The reasons for non adherence included restriction of ambulation, fear of dependence, nasal discomfort and expenses incurred (Table/Fig 6).

Discussion

The COPD is a progressive condition with a variable time course for evolution of the disease process. Severe chronic hypoxemia is a sign of advanced disease in COPD and is a predictor of limited survival. The HRQoL is often impaired in patients with COPD as a result of reduced lung function, progressive dyspnoea, recurrent exacerbations and adverse effects of medications.

The QoL was impaired in our study subjects as evidenced by high SGRQ scores at baseline. The mean scores for symptoms, activity, impact subscales and total SGRQ score were 73.24±6.87, 74.11±11.48, 71.41±9.35 and 72.51±8.88, respectively at baseline. A decrease of 4 units in the SGRQ score is generally accepted as Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID). This means that if an intervention has produced atleast four units improvement in SGRQ, it is likely to be useful in clinical practice. A change of eight units is moderately efficacious while a change of 12 units is very efficacious treatment [12-14]. The SGRQ symptoms, activity, impact and total scores improved at three months of LTOT. These scores were 62.56±8.57, 61.55±10.71, 48.62±16.7 and 54.63±13.16, respectively at the end of 12 months of LTOT. The use of LTOT in this study has produced clinically important difference in all three subscales and total score of SGRQ questionnaire.

Long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy in COPD patients produced a statistically significant improvement in symptoms, activity, impact and total SGRQ scores within three months as well as in the symptoms and activity scores at 12 months. Although there was no further significant improvement in SGRQ scores at six months, mean of the total SGRQ scores remained below 60 at each of the follow-up visits indicating sustained improvement in overall HRQoL in response to domiciliary oxygen therapy. The present study did not demonstrate an improvement in mMRC dyspnoea scores in spite of improvement in overall HRQoL. This is possibly due to the progressive nature of the disease with gradual decline in lung function.

There are conflicting data regarding the benefits of LTOT in COPD patients. A prospective, longitudinal study by Eaton T et al., in 43 COPD patients on LTOT, found that patients on LTOT had significant improvement in all domains of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) by two months, which were either maintained or further improved at six months (8). In a study from Brazil, LTOT appears to have a beneficial effect on COPD symptoms as assessed by SGRQ scores when patients were followed-up for one year (15). In contrast, Okubadejo AA et al., were unable to show a change in HRQoL as assessed by the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, in hypoxemic COPD patients on domiciliary oxygen for six months (16). Unlike the study group, the control group in this study had only moderate hypoxemia and did not use an oxygen concentrator. Similarly, Moore RP et al., could not demonstrate a significant improvement in HRQoL or dyspnoea in 143 COPD patients with exertional breathlessness on domiciliary ambulatory oxygen (17). However, this study utilised oxygen cylinders as the source of oxygen and also excluded subjects with severe hypoxemia.

COPD exacerbations contribute to disease progression and have a negative impact on the overall health. The strongest predictor of COPD exacerbation is the number of exacerbations in the previous year and patients who have frequent exacerbations (defined as two or more exacerbations per year) have greater morbidity (18). A study by Türkog? lu N et al., showed that the use of LTOT could reduce one-year hospital admissions and improves arterial blood gases (19). According to the present study, home oxygen therapy could produce a significant reduction in the frequency of exacerbations in patients with severe hypoxemia. The reduction in the number of exacerbations with oxygen therapy could be a factor contributing to the improved QoL in COPD. However, in a multicentre study on 738 stable COPD patients with moderate desaturation alone, the prescription of long-term supplemental oxygen did not result in reduction in exacerbations or improvement in QoL (20).

Adherence to LTOT was assessed after 12 months in our study. Majority of the 53 patients who completed the one year follow-up were adherent to treatment 36 (67.92%). Various studies have reported adherence rates to LTOT ranging from 45-70% (21). The perceived clinical benefits, adequate patient education and reinforcement of the need to continue on home oxygen therapy during follow-up visits could be factors contributing to the high adherence rates in our study. Limitation of physical activities, social stigma and fear of oxygen addiction has been described by patients as factors that could be deterrents to home oxygen therapy (22). Some of these factors are easily modifiable with timely intervention of the healthcare provider. Pépin JL et al., assessed the daily use of oxygen therapy in 930 COPD patients and found that more hypoxic and severely diseased patients had a better adherence to treatment. Other factors identified with good compliance were a proper oxygen prescription, supplementary education on oxygen therapy by a nurse or physiotherapist, cessation of smoking, use of oxygen in all domestic situations and absence of side-effects (23).

Limitation(s)

The final study cohort was small and therefore, the external validity of these results is probably low. Adherence was assessed from patient reported data, which is liable to be inaccurate or under reported. The follow-up period of one year was not sufficient for assessing the long-term QoL. A longitudinal study of longer duration with a larger sample size and with a non LTOT comparison group could address these issues. Considering the long-term requirement of LTOT in COPD and logistic difficulties encountered, a cost-benefit analysis is recommended.

Conclusion

The introduction of LTOT in COPD patients with severe hypoxemia produces improvement in HRQoL as early as three months. Continued adherence to oxygen usage sustains this improvement in QoL for atleast one year. An appropriate prescription for LTOT and effective patient education can result in good adherence to domiciliary oxygen therapy. LTOT could also have a positive impact on the prognosis in COPD by reducing the number of exacerbations.

Acknowledgement

The SGRQ questionnaire, used for the assessment of HRQoL in this study, was used with permission from the developer. The authors acknowledge and thank the developer for providing the questionnaire free of charges for academic research.

References

1.
Jacobs SS, Krishnan JA, Lederer DJ, Ghazipura M, Hossain T, Tan AM, et al. Home oxygen therapy for adults with chronic lung disease. An official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(10):e121-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Hardinge M, Annandale J, Bourne S, Cooper B, Evans A, Freeman D, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for home oxygen use in adults. Thorax. 2015;70(Suppl 1):i1-i43. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Kim V, Benditt JO, Wise RA, Sharafkhaneh A. Oxygen therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(4):513-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Karamanli H, Ilik F, Kayhan F, Pazarli AC. Assessment of cognitive impairment in long-term oxygen therapy-dependent COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:2087-94. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
McNicholas WT, Verbraecken J, Marin JM. Sleep disorders in COPD: The forgotten dimension. Eur Respir Rev. 2013;22(129):365-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Nocturnal oxygen therapy trial group. Continuous or nocturnal oxygen therapy in hypoxemic chronic obstructive lung disease: A clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93(3):391-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Report of the medical research council working party. Long term domiciliary oxygen therapy in chronic hypoxic cor pulmonale complicating chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Lancet. 1981;1(8222):681-86. [crossref]
8.
Eaton T, Lewis C, Young P, Kennedy Y, Garrett JE, Kolbe J. Long-term oxygen therapy improves health-related quality of life. Respir Med. 2004;98(4):285-93. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Coleta KD, Lima DF, Tanni SE, Martins R, Godoy I. Quality of life improvement in patients treated using long-term oxygen therapy. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:(Suppl.52):3354.
10.
Karthikeyan G, Chinnusamy K, Salai KM. Effect of LTOT on PASP in patients with pulmonary hypertension due to chronic lung disease. Panacea J Med Sci. 2020;10(3):194-96. [crossref]
11.
Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM. The St. George’s respiratory questionnaire. Resp Med. 1991;85(Suppl B):25-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Jones PW and the Nedocromil Sodium Quality of Life Study Group. Quality of life, symptoms, and pulmonary function in asthma: Long-term treatment with nedocromil sodium examined in a controlled multicentre trial. Eur Respir J. 1994;7(1):55-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Jones PW. Interpreting thresholds for a clinically significant change in health status in asthma and COPD. Eur Respir J. 2002;19(3):398-404. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Jones PW. St. George’s respiratory questionnaire: MCID, COPD. 2005;2(1):75-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Mesquita CB, Knaut C, Caram LMO, Ferrari R, Bazan SGZ, Godoy I, et al. Impact of adherence to long-term oxygen therapy on patients with COPD and exertional hypoxemia followed for one year. J Bras Pneumol. 2018;44(5);390-97. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Okubadejo AA, Paul EA, Jones PW, Wedzicha JA. Does long-term affect quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and severe hypoxaemia? Eur Respir J. 1996;9(11):2335-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Moore RP, Berlowitz DJ, Denehy L, Pretto JJ, Brazzale DJ, Sharpe K, et al. A randomised trial of domiciliary, ambulatory oxygen in patients with COPD and dyspnoea but without resting hypoxaemia. Thorax. 2011;66(1):32-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD: Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease; 2023. Available from: https://goldcopd.org/2023-gold-report-2/.
19.
Türkog? lu N, Örnek T, Atalay F, Erboy F, Altinsoy B, Tanriverdi H, et al. Evaluating the efficiency of long term oxygen therapy and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur J Gen Med. 2015;12(1):18-25. [crossref]
20.
Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial Research Group, Albert RK, Au DH, Blackford AL, Casaburi R, Cooper JA Jr, Criner GJ, et al. A randomized trial of long-term oxygen for COPD with moderate desaturation. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(17):1617-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Katsenos S, Constantopoulos SH. Long-term oxygen therapy in COPD: Factors affecting and ways of improving patient compliance. Pulm Med. 2011;2011:325362. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Patro M, Gothi D, Anand S, Agarwal M. Long-term oxygen therapy prescription in India: Evaluation of compliance, factors affecting compliance, indications, and survival. Lung India. 2022;39(2):129-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Pépin JL, Barjhoux CE, Deschaux C, Brambilla C. Long-term oxygen therapy at home. Compliance with medical prescription and effective use of therapy. ANTADIR Working Group on Oxygen Therapy. Association Nationale de Traitement à Domicile des Insuffisants Respiratories. Chest. 1996;109(5):1144-50.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/62248.17581

Date of Submission: Dec 16, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Jan 09, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 16, 2023
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 14, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 18, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 30, 2023 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com