Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 104723

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : June | Volume : 17 | Issue : 6 | Page : NC09 - NC12 Full Version

Effect of Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab on Diabetic Macular Oedema at a Tertiary Centre in West Bengal: A Prospective Study


Published: June 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59568.17992
Vysakh Balan, Atanu Biswas

1. Senior Resident, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine and JNM Hospital, Kalyani, West Bengal, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine and JNM Hospital, Kalyani, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Atanu Biswas,
B-12/95, Kalyani-741235, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: biswasatanudr@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is one among the many causes of visual loss in people all over the world. Diabetic Macular Oedema (DME) is the most common among vision threatening complications of DR, with a major impact on quality of life of the patient. The intravitreal ranibizumab injection anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), which prevents neovascularisation, is given monthly with approved dose of 0.3/0.5 mg with or without laser in the option of choice for all cases of central involving macular oedema.

Aim: To find out the effectiveness of injection ranibizumab on patients with DME and to provide the better line of treatment for DME patients.

Materials and Methods: This prospective study with quasi-experimental design constituted all the Type I and II Diabetic patients attending Outpatient Department (OPD) in College of Medicine and JNM Hospital, West Bengal, India from December 2019 to January 2021. Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) images were obtained and used to diagnose macular oedema. Intravitreal injection ranibizumab (0.5 mg) was given as a standard treatment protocol with a dose interval of one month to all the DME patients. Foveal Thickness (FT) and Visual Acuity (VA) were evaluated before and after one month of injection. The t-test was used to compare the mean value of Central Macular Thickness (CMT) before and after intervention, p<0.05 was considered for statistical significance.

Results: A total of 105 patients (54 females and 51 males), were included. The mean age of the population was 55.1 years and gender distribution being: females- 54 (51.4%) and males- 51 (48.6%). Mean duration of diabetes was 10.7 years. CMT value significantly decreased from mean of 416.0095 to 383.8667 after injection. The mean LogMAR value significantly decreased from 1.0350 to 0.8625 after injection. Positive correlation was found between LogMAR after treatment with CMT (r-0.857; p-value <0.0001).

Conclusion: Single dose of 0.5 mg of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab is effective in decreasing the CMT and improving VA in patients with DME.

Keywords

Central macular thickness, Diabetes mellitus, Diabetic retinopathy, Foveal thickness

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a well-established risk factor for macrovascular and microvascular complications (1). In 2019, DM affected 463 million people globally and is expected to raise to 578 million by the year 2030 (2). DR is a complication that causes decreased vision in diabetics and it includes diabetic macular ischaemia, DME, tractional retinal detachment, and vitreous haemorrhage (3). Of all these, DME is the most common complication which causes foremost impact on the quality of life of the patient (4). The main molecular mechanism primarily causing DME is disruption of the blood retinal barrier by phosphorylation of the junctional proteins (5). Researchers raised a possibility of a chemical that promotes vasoproliferation and this led to the hypothesis that some chemical substances could be the causative agents of DME (6). It is confirmed by the discovery of VEGF, which was shown by sequencing analysis to be identical molecules. Angiogenesis throughout the body and eye is promoted by this biochemical signal protein, VEGF, thus setting up the stage to inhibit the single molecular target which was putatively responsible for the formation of DME (7),(8). The first anti-VEGF agent to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) is intravitreal ranibizumab. It is manufactured in the US by Gentech\Roche and is a recombinant humanised IgG monoclonal antibody fragment which attaches to and inhibits VEGF. Thus, it prevents the subsequent growth of new blood vessels by interrupting the interface of VEGF with its receptors (9).

It was first approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2006 for wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) since then it has been approved for the treatment of macular oedema following Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) and DME. In 2015, it was approved for patients with DR (10). The sanctioned dose of intravitreal ranibizumab is either 0.3/0.5 mg in 0.05 mL with dosing recommendation varying according to indications (9). However, actual treatment protocols vary but include strict monthly administration as needed. Injection intervals vary including treat and extend regimen, and depends on disease patient and physician.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of a single dose of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab on patients with DME. The study also aimed to evaluate the impact of the intravitreal injection of ranibizumab on Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and on CMT/FT in SD-OCT.

Material and Methods

This prospective study with quasi-experimental design was conducted in the OPD at College of Medicine and JNM Hospital, Kalyani, West Bengal, India, from December 2019 to January 2021. The study protocol included administration of single dose of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (0.5 mg) in those with DME and the effect at the end of one month. The study has been approved by Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) vide letter number (CM-JNM-2019-095).

Inclusion criteria: Those with centre involving DME secondary to DM (Type 1 or 2), willingness to provide written informed consent as applicable, age ≥18 years, retinal thickening secondary to DME involving centre of the fovea with CMT ≥250 μm in the centre subfield as assessed on OCT, decrease in vision determined to be primarily the result of DME and not to other causes and ability and willing to return for all scheduled visits and undergo assessments were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Those with history of vitreoretinal surgery in the study eye, with Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation (PRP) or macular laser photocoagulation and previous use of intraocular corticosteroids within three months of screening, those with previous use of intraocular corticosteroids in the study eye {e.g., Triamcinolone Acetate (TA)} within three months of screening, those with previous treatment with antiangiogenic drugs in either eye (pegaptanib sodium, anecortave acetate, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, etc.,) within three months of the day 0 (first day of treatment) visit, those with Proliferative DR (PDR) in the study eye, iris neovascularisation, vitreous haemorrhage, traction retinal detachment, or preretinal fibrosis involving the macula in the study eye and those patients with mature cataract or media opacities due to poor quality OCT images were all excluded from the study.

Sample size estimation: The study by Raman R et al., found that the incidence of DME was 2.6% (11). So, considering p=0.026, the number of patients required for the present study was 105.07~105 with power 87%. Formula used for sample size calculation:

n=4pq/(L2)

Where, n=required sample size, p=0.026
q=1-p,
L=Loss % (Loss of information)
Here, p=0.026,
q=1-p=1-0.026=0.974,
4pq=4×0.026×0.974=0.101296
L2=0.000964
L=0.0310
Loss of information percentage=3.10%
n=4pq/(L2)=0.101296/0.000964=105.07=105

Study Procedure

All the relevant examinations were done, including VA, slit lamp, indirect and direct ophthalmoscopy. SD-OCT images were obtained. Patients were prepared for intravitreal injection ranibizumab. Intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (0.5 mg) was given as per standard treatment protocol. Follow-up was done with SD-OCT and VA test and were repeated after one month. The outcome assessed by comparing SD-OCT images and VA before and after one month of injection ranibizumab. CMT: First, line scan was done and taken for subjective analysis with fovea centred at 0° angle. Then, macular cube scan 200×200 was taken and the macula was mapped on fast macular thickness map. It comprises three concentric circles centred on the fovea; the fovea (<1 mm diameter), the inner macula (1-3 mm), and the outer macula (3-6 mm). These zones were further divided into nine early treatment DR study regions. Since, CMT was highly correlated between the right and left eyes among the 170 participants, the average CMT between both eyes was taken as the value.

LogMAR value in the measurement of VA is measured as follows: each letter in LogMAR chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there are five letters per line, the total score for a line on the LogMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units. The formula used in calculating the score is:

LogMAR VA=0.1+LogMAR value of the best line read-0.02×(number of optotypes read)

Statistical Analysis

For statistical analysis data were entered in Microsoft excel spreadsheet and then analysed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0; (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, US) and 10GraphPad Prism version 5. Two-sample t-tests for a difference in mean involved unpaired samples or independent samples. T-test was used to compare the mean value of CMT and VA before and after intervention, p<0.05 was considered for statistical significance. Correlation between CMT and VA was tested using Pearson’s correlation coefficient test.

Results

In all 105 patients in the study, single eye was affected. The mean age was 55.1143 years ranging from 38 to 80 years; 54 (51.4%) patients were females and 51 (48.6%) patients were males (Table/Fig 1).

A total of 50 (47.6%) patients had DME in the left eye and 55 (52.4%) had DME in the right eye. Mean CMT before injection was 416.0095 and after injection was 383.8667 with median of 407 and 372 respectively. Mean logMAR before injection was 1.0350 and after injection was 0.8625 with median of 1 and 0.78, respectively (Table/Fig 2). A positive correlation was found between CMT before and after injection ranibizumab vs age but result was not statistically significant (Table/Fig 3). The value of Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was 0.845. A high positive correlation was found between logMAR before injection ranibizumab vs CMT before injection ranibizumab (Table/Fig 4). The correlation between VA and CMT after injection ranibizumab was high and statistically significant. The value of Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was 0.857. High positive correlation was found between logMAR after injection ranibizumab vs CMT after injection ranibizumab (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

Patients included in study were with centre-involving DME secondary to DM. Retinal thickening secondary to DME involving the centre of the fovea with CMT ≥275 μm in the centre subfield as assessed on OCT. Decrease in vision was determined to be primarily the result of DME and not to other causes. Ability (in the opinion of the investigator) and willingness to return for all scheduled visits and assessments. Total 105 patients were included in the present study. Inagaki K et al., showed that the mean logMAR VA had improved from 0.52±0.34 at baseline to 0.44±0.32 at one month after treatment. The mean CMT decreased significantly by one month (12).

Minami Y et al., showed mean FT decreased significantly from 452±77 to 429±65 μm after two hours. Significant improvement in mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution BCVA was noted. The ?FT after two hour significantly correlated with the ?FT after one month. The ?VA after 1 day significantly correlated with the ?VA after one month (13). It was reported by Campochiaro PA et al., that between macular oedema after Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO) and DME there are several cytokines whose levels in the aqueous humour differed (14). The authors are of the opinion that by measuring the short-term intravitreal injection ranibizumab effects will be useful to consider the difference in the mechanisms of macular oedema between BRVO and DME by additional measurement of the intraocular cytokine levels in eyes and also aid to predict efficacy of the drug.

Sharaf A et al., in their study found that, at one month CMT was 341.0±88.66 μm with 17.96% improvement with mean pre-injection CMT being 432.0±144.0 μm (15). In the current study, CMT preinjection was 416.0095±93.3345 μm and one month postinjection was 383.8667±90.2228 μm, with Pearson’s correlation coefficient being 0.061 and 0.052 suggesting a positive correlation.

Welch DE et al., in the past reported that one to two hours after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) the FT decreased significantly in two patients with exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and seven patients with DME, in their study (16). They reported that, within two hour after injection a significant decrease in OCT thickness. Although, a different anti-VEGF drug (bevacizumab) was used in patients with DME and AMD, the current findings match the results of their study. It was stated that baseline FT may envisage the structural result in response to IVR treatment (17). Also, between the baseline BCVA and the BCVA at one month, there was a significant correlation. Baseline BCVA may predict the functional outcome after IVR treatment, as reported previously (18),(19). However, no significant correlation between the ?VA-one month and the baseline BCVA was found. As previously reported in the study, eyes with a low baseline VA tend to have a large increase in the ?VA-one month (20).

The study showed that the mean logMAR before injection ranibizumab (mean±SD) in patients was 1.0350±0.5096 and the mean logMAR after injection ranibizumab (mean±sd) of patients was 0.8625±0.4863.

It was examined that the value of Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was 0.072. A positive correlation was found between logMAR before injection ranibizumab vs age. The study showed that the value of Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was 0.047. The positive correlation was found between logMAR after injection ranibizumab vs age.

Limitation(s)

The present study was a monocentric study and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown limiting the logistics of patients and visits for follow-up were done only in the emergency cases.

Conclusion

The present study concludes that a single dose of 0.5 mg of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab seems to be effective in decreasing the CMT and improving VA in patients with DME. The need for the present study was to evaluate the effect of single dose injection ranibizumab in patients with DME which was achieved. However, this study also recommends large scale multicentric studies with larger sample size to further validate the findings of the present study.

References

1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report: Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1-12.
2.
Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Prac. 2014;103(2):137-49. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. The 14-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(6):998-1003. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Davidov E, Breitscheidel L, Clouth J, Reips M, Happich M. Diabetic retinopathy and health-related quality of life. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmol. 2009;247(2):267-72. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Chibber R, Molinatti PA, Rosatto N, Lambourne B, Kohner EM. Toxic action of advanced glycation end products on cultured retinal capillary pericytes and endothelial cells: Relevance to diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia. 1997;40(2):156-64. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implications. N Eng J Med. 1971;285(21):1182-86. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Ferrara N, Henzel WJ. Pituitary follicular cells secrete a novel heparin-binding growth factor specific for vascular endothelial cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1989;161(2):851-58. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Connolly DT, Heuvelman DM, Nelson R, Olander JV, Eppley BL, Delfino JJ, et al. Tumor vascular permeability factor stimulates endothelial cell growth and angiogenesis. J Clin Inves. 1989;84(5):1470-78. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Garnock-Jones KP. Ranibizumab: In macular oedema following retinal vein occlusion. Drugs. 2011;71(4):455-63.
10.
Sarwar S, Hanout M, Sadiq MA, Soliman MK, Agarwal A, Do DV, et al. The role of ranibizumab in the management of diabetic retinopathy. Exppert Rev Ophthalmol. 2015;10(4):329-40. [crossref]
11.
Raman R, Ganesan S, Pal SS, Gella L, Kulothungan V, Sharma T. Incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy in Urban India: Sankara Nethralaya-diabetic retinopathy epidemiology and molecular genetics study (SN-DREAMS II), report 1. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. 2017;24(5):294-302. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Inagaki K, Hamada M, Ohkoshi K. Minimally invasive laser treatment combined with intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular oedema. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):01-08. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Minami Y, Nagaoka T, Ishibazawa A, Yoshida A. Short-term effects of intravitreal ranibizumab therapy on diabetic macular edema. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(28):08-12.[crossref][PubMed]
14.
Campochiaro PA, Choy DF, Do DV, Hafiz G, Shah SM, Nguyen QD, et al. Monitoring ocular drug therapy by analysis of aqueous samples. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2158-64. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Sharaf A, Nabawi KS, Shalaby TM, Swelem HS. Short-term results of intravitreal ranibizumab injection in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Delta J Ophthalmol. 2015;16(2):77. [crossref]
16.
Welch DE, Elmariah H, Peden MC, Adams SG, Ratnakaram R, Kaushal S. Shortterm response of macular oedema to intravitreal bevacizumab. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:1033-36. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Karth PA, Chang A, Wirostko W. Paired responses to intravitreal bevacizumab in diabetic macular edema. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:207-11. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Mitchell P, Bandello F, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Lang GE, Massin P, Schlingemann RO, et al. The RESTORE study: Ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmol. 2011;118:615-62. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Ishibashi T, Li X, Koh A, Lai TY, Lee FL, Lee WK, et al. The REVEAL Study: Ranibizumab monotherapy or combined with laser versus laser monotherapy in Asian patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:1402-15. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Sophie R, Lu N, Campochiaro PA. Predictors of functional and anatomic outcomes in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with ranibizumab. Ophthalmol. 2015;122:1395-401.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59568.17992

Date of Submission: Aug 08, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 04, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 21, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 14, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jan 09, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 20, 2023 (25%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com