Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 84310

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : June | Volume : 17 | Issue : 6 | Page : ZC25 - ZC28 Full Version

Treatment of Dentinal Hypersensitivity with Diode Laser of Two Different Wavelengths- A Randomised Clinical Trial


Published: June 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59983.18073
Gautami S Penmetsa, Sravanthi Vundavalli, B Anusha, MAKV Raju, NVS Sruthima, Sathyavalli Veluri, N Hari Priya, Bharghavi Patnaik

1. Professor and Head, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Postgraduate, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Professor, Department of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 5. Professor, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 6. Postgraduate, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 7. Postgraduate, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. 8. Postgraduate, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sravanthi Vundavalli,
Postgraduate, Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Block 2, Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram-534202, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: Sravanthi.vundavalli95@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Dentinal Hypersensitivity (DH) is one of the most prevalent dental issues that is treated by both periodontists and endodontists. Hypersensitive dentin is a sensitive or painful response that is one of the most prevalent and poorly treated chronic dental disorders. Due to the difficulty in treating cervical DH, a great range of approaches and therapeutic procedures for pain relief in have developed. Treatments with desensitising drugs have been combined with laser treatment in recent decades. The most often utilised lasers in the treatment of DH are Diode Lasers (DL). DL act on DH provoking a melting effect with crystallisation of dentine inorganic component and the coagulation of fluids contained into the dentinal tubules.

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of DL of two different wavelengths in managing DH.

Materials and Methods: This split-mouth randomised clinical trial conducted in the Department of Periodontology at Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. The duration of the study was, from October 2021 to December 2021. A total of 12 patients with DH were selected and assigned to two groups. All the patients were subjected to desensitisation using DL of two different wavelengths 475 nm Bluelase system and 810 nm. Denlase system and parameters were evaluated 15 minutes after treatment, 7 days, 15 days and 30 days after treatment. Data were entered in Microsoft excel and analysed using Statitical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 10.5 software.

Results: The mean age of the study participants was 45±3 years. There was a significant difference (p-value <0.001) in tooth sensitivity values measured at baseline, and at different time intervals in both groups. Among the two groups, Denlase group showed the greatest reduction in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores from baseline to one month recall compared to Bluelase laser group. Highly significant difference was found when mean VAS scores were compared between baseline and all the other time points (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion: The present study concluded that, based on the results obtained, DL of 810 nm Denlase system was effective than DL of 475 nm Bluelase system in reducing the DH. Desensitisation treatment with laser irradiation has shown to be effective in the present study.

Keywords

Denlase, Desensitisation, Laser therapy

The DH is characterised by sharp, short pain arising from exposed dentin in response to stimuli typically tactile, evaporative, thermal, chemical, osmotic, that cannot be attributed to any other pathology. It is one of the common problems encountered in dental practice (1). Although, sensitivity can occur on any part of the tooth, it is most commonly felt in the cervical region and on the tooth root surface. Frequency ranges between 3%-57%, and is much more frequent in patients suffering from periodontal disease (2). Denudation of dentin mainly occurs due to two reasons: i) removal of enamel for any reason; ii) denudation of root surface following the loss of cementum and recession of the supporting periodontal tissues (3). With the advancements in dentistry and oral hygiene promotion, greater proportion of the older population is retaining their teeth, and thus, the prevalence of denuded root surfaces following gingival recession and periodontal surgery is raising (4). DH occurs according to the hydrodynamic theory, where external stimuli cause the movement of fluid inside the dentinal tubules inwards or outwards, promoting mechanical deformation of nerve ending at the pulp dentine interface, which is transmitted as pain sensation (5).

The effectiveness of the various treatment options for DH is directly associated with the sealing of dentinal tubules to prevent dentinal fluid flow or blocking nerve activity. Difficulty in treating cervical DH gave rise to a large number of techniques and therapeutic procedures which are currently used for pain alleviation. In recent decades, treatments with desensitising agents have been supplemented using a laser (4). The development of laser technology over last few decades, as well as, its widespread use in dentistry, has provided a new therapeutic alternative for the treatment of DH. Most often used lasers in the treatment of DH are DLs (6). Treatment with laser irradiation has shown to be effective in recent research. Studies have addressed the safety of using a laser for treating DH, analysing the possibility of laser-induced pulp damage. One such study found that, if the temperature increase within the pulp remains below 5°C, then no pulp damage is evident. This thermal threshold is generally not exceeded when the energy and power settings of the laser remain within reported ranges (7). The mechanisms of laser therapy for DH remain unknown. Depending on the active medium, wavelength, power density of the laser, and the optical properties of the target tissue, the laser produces various tissue reactions by interacting with it. A laser must melt and resolidify the dentin surface to change it. Dentinal tubules are effectively closed. Laser therapy is thought to lessens sensitivity by coagulation and protein precipitation of plasma in the dentinal fluid, or by changes in nerve fibre activity, according to Pashley DH (8).

The majority of research using various types of lasers, different wavelengths, and varying durations of application suggest that, this treatment is successful, immediately after treatment and later on. DH has traditionally been treated with lasers of various wavelengths (810, 940, and 980 nm) (9). As a new horizon in the field of dentistry, a DL device emitting blue light was introduced.

This Bluelase system has several benefits, including high working effectiveness at low power levels and low depth of absorption of light at 475 nm, indicating minimal harm to the pulpal tissues (10). There is very little literature on comparing different wavelengths of the lasers. Thus, the primary aim of the study was to compare effectiveness of DL of two different wavelengths (475 nm with 810 nm) in managing DH.

Material and Methods

This split-mouth randomised clinical trial conducted in the Department of Periodontology at Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, India. The duration of the study was, from October 2021 to December 2021. The study was approved by the Institutional research committee and ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IECVDC/2021/PG01/PI/IVV/48) CTRI/
2021/08/035329. Written informed consent was obtained from patients who were willing to participate voluntarily. (Table/Fig 1) shows the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram of study participants.

Sample size calculation: Calculations to determine the sample size was performed using G-Power 3.1 software. The calculations were based on an effect size of 0.38 (4) and an α-value of 0.5 with a desired power of 80%. The estimated sample size was 10 patients. Considering 10% loss of follow-up, 12 patients were included in the study.

Inclusion criteria: A total of 12 systemically healthy patients, previously untreated for DH, aged between 18-60 years with a chief complaint of DH, contributing 68 teeth were enrolled for the study. Patients in good systemic health with clinically elicitable dentin hypersensitivity who were reliable in their response to test measurements and those, who were not treated earlier for DH were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with any systemic diseases or conditions and those, who were on any analgesics/anti-inflammatory drugs at the time of the study. Patients who had used any desensitising paste or mouthwash during the last six months and patients with cracked teeth, large carious lesions or restored teeth and wasting diseases were excluded in the study.

Study Procedure

A total of 12 systemically healthy patients, previously untreated for DH, aged between 32-60 years with a chief complaint of DH, 12 patients contributing 68 teeth were enrolled for the study. A 2-4 teeth were treated in each side. The patients who satisfied all the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. DH was assessed using evaporative stimuli. The evaporative stimulus was performed using an air syringe of the dental unit that was directed to the exposed tooth area for three seconds at a distance of 1 cm and a right angle to the buccal site of the assigned teeth. The patient then was asked to record their comfort by marking a point on a 10 cm VAS. A 0-10 numerical pain rating scales was given to the patient and they were asked to rate their pain. 0: no pain, 1-3: mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: severe pain.

In each patient, hypersensitivity teeth in two different quadrants were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups by the coin toss method.

Group 1: diode laser 810 nm-Denlase system
Group 2: diode laser 475 nm-Bluelase system

After the oral prophylaxis, baseline hypersensitivity scores were noted. The DL of wavelength 810 nm and 475 nm of frequency 15 Hz and power of 0.5 W in a continuous mode for one minute (4) was directed onto the hypersensitivity tooth surfaces and parameters were evaluated for 15 minutes, 1 week, 14 days, and 1 month after treatment (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5).

Statistical Analysis

Repeated measures of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni test was used for statistical analysis. Data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analysed using SPSS version 10.5. Bonferronni test was used for pair-wise comparison between the group/visit. The results were averaged (mean±standard deviation) for continuous data. p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean age of the participated subjects was 45±3 years. A total of 12 subjects were included in the present study. Patients who presented with cervical hypersensitivity when the air was delivered against the tooth surface were enrolled in the study. No adverse effects had been observed in any of the cases during the study. The mean VAS score for the Denlase group at baseline was 8.38±1.01 and after the treatment mean value reduced to 0.64±1.27 after 15 minutes, 0.29±1.03 at one week, 0.26±0.96 at 15 days and one month with a p-value <0.001 at all time intervals which was highly statistically significant (Table/Fig 6). Data for pair-wise comparison has been given in (Table/Fig 7). Highly significant difference was found, when mean VAS scores were compared between baseline and all the other time points (p<0.001).

The mean VAS score for the Blulase group at baseline was 7.73±2.67 and after the treatment mean value reduced to 2.23±1.67 after 15 minutes, 1.94±1.55 at one week and 14 days, 1.85±1.50 at one month with a p-value <0.001 at all time intervals which was highly statistically significant (Table/Fig 8). On pair-wise comparison significant difference was found when mean VAS scores were compared between baseline and all the other time points (Table/Fig 9). On intergroup analysis, there was significant reduction in mean VAS scores in Denlase group when compared to Bluelase group at all time periods except baseline (p<0.001). Hence, Denlase laser performed better in reduction of sensitivity when compared to Bluelase group (Table/Fig 10).

Discussion

The main hypothesis evaluated in the present study was, whether applying an 810 nm DL and a 470 nm DL to a tooth with DH for 60 seconds would result in a significantly larger immediate reduction of DH. Denlase group was better when compared to Bluelase group in reducing the DH. The dentinal hypersensitivity is a quite common issue found in a dental practice that is characterised by a sharp, transitory unpleasant response to a stimulus such as eating, drinking, brushing one’s teeth, or breathing, thus, impacting the quality of life (11). Individual treatment needs for DH vary depending on the aetiology, as well as, the subjective perception of painful sensations and the degree of tolerance to this type of pain (12) because the aetiology of DH may be complex, evidence from past studies suggest that, many techniques have been used during treatment to achieve excellent results.

Traditional DH treatment involves using desensitising agents to obliterate the dentinal tubules that are exposed to the oral environment. Since, the use of tubule occlusive agents have several drawbacks, such as, the necessity for multiple administrations, a longer treatment time, and poor patient compliance, the demand for alternate treatment techniques has arisen. In the last decade, laser technology has given rise to a new therapeutic option for DH. The majority of experimental and clinical research on the effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Treatment (LLLT) on DH used DLs with wavelengths ranging from 635-910 nm (13). Low-power lasers have been used to treat DH using a variety of irradiation techniques. Their interaction with dental pulp creates a photo-bio modulating effect, increasing the metabolic activity of odontoblastic cells and, as a result, obliteration of the dentinal tubules and intensification of tertiary dentin formation. Furthermore, the low-power laser is thought to enhance cell circulation and activity, resulting in anti-inflammatory effects, analgesia, and tissue normalcy (14). Until now, DLs of various wavelengths, such as 660, 810, 940, and 980 nm, have been used in the treatment of DH [4,14]. Recently, a blue DL device was developed, a new laser that is now available in the field of medicine and dentistry. This Bluelase system has several benefits, including high working effectiveness at low power levels and a low depth of absorption of light at 475 nm, which indicates minimal harm to the pulpal tissues (8).

In the present study, there was a decrease in sensitivity ratings on the VAS scale in both groups from baseline to 15 minutes after treatment, with a significant difference. The results were similar to those achieved in a study by Dilsiz A et al., in which Nd: YAG and a 685 nm DL were utilised to treat DH and provide immediate relief. Their findings revealed a considerable reduction in DH, as well as, rapid and long term therapeutic effects on teeth with gingival recession (15). In a clinical study, conducted by García-Godoy F, 660 nm was used in the treatment of DH after non surgical periodontal therapy. He reported a statistically significant reduction in hypersensitivity immediately after therapy (after two minutes), two weeks, one month, and two months after treatment. The findings were similar to those of the current investigation (16). The results obtained were comparable to the results obtained in the study by Bilichodmath R et al., where they compared Stannous Fluoride (SnF2) and DL in the treatment of DH for providing instant relief (4). In clinical investigations by Tabatabaei MH et al., Garcia-Delaney C et al., and Hashim NT et al., found that, DL was successful in delivering instant alleviation of hypersensitivity. The findings of the current investigation were comparable to the above mentioned studies (3),(17),(18).

Limitation(s)

In the present study, the authors have used single energy level and single application of laser for desensitisation, which could be a limitation to the present study.

Conclusion

Desensitisation treatment with laser irradiation has shown to be effective in the present study, 810 nm DL has shown to be more effective in treating hypersensitivity when compared to 475 nm DL at different time intervals. Further long term research is required to evaluate the predictability and the effectiveness of lasers in the treatment of DH.

References

1.
Walters PA. Dentinal hypersensitivity: A review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005;6(2):107-17. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Rees JS. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in general dental practise in the UK. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27:860-65. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Tabatabaei MH, Chiniforush N, Hashemi G, Valizadeh S. Efficacy Comparison of Nd:YAG laser, diode laser and dentine bonding agent in dentine hypersensitivity reduction: A clinical trial. Laser Ther. 2018;27(4):265-70. Doi: 10.5978/islsm.27_18- OR-24. PMID: 31182901; PMCID: PMC6513766. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Bilichodmath R, Kumar RV, Bilichodmath S, Sameera U. Diode laser in the treatment ofdentinal hypersensitivity: A reliable approach. J Dent Lasers. 2018;12:56-62. [crossref]
5.
Praveen R, Thakur S, Kirthiga M, Narmatha M. Comparative evaluation of a low- level laser and topical desensitising agent for treating dentinal hypersensitivity: A randomised controlled trial. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(5):495-99. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Jokstad A. The effectiveness of lasers to reduce dentinal hypersensitivity remains unclear. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12(3 Suppl):231-32. Doi: 10.1016/S1532- 3382(12)70045-3. PMID: 23253852. [crossref]
7.
Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Yonaga K, Matsumoto K. Treatment of dentine hypersensitivity by lasers: A review. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27(10):715-21. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Pashley DH. How can sensitive dentine become hypersensitive and can it be reversed? J Dent. 2013;41(Suppl 4):S49-55. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Abdelfattah MM, Anagnostaki E. Effect of diode lasers in treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Dent Lasers. 2017;11(2):34. [crossref]
10.
Frentzen M, Kraus D, Reichelt J, Engelbach C, Dehn C, Meister JA, et al. Novel blue light diode laser (445 nm) for dental application. Laser. 2016;8:06-13.
11.
Anusha B, Murthy KRV. Evaluation of efficacy of arginine calcium carbonate vs Potassium nitrate paste in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. Ind J Clin Res Dent. 2020;1(2):24-29. [crossref]
12.
Penmetsa GS, Kollati P, Dwarakanath CD. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of Novamin and Pro-Argin in reducing dentinal hypersensitivity: A double blind randomised controlled clinical trial. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res. 2016;4(3):14.
13.
Mahdian M, Behboodi S, Ogata Y, Natto ZS. Laser therapy for dentinal hypersensitivity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;7(7):CD009434. Doi: 10.1002/14651858. [crossref]
14.
Narongdej T, Sakoolnamarka R, Boonroung T. The effectiveness of a calcium sodium phosphosilicate desensitiser in reducing cervical dentin hypersensitivity, A pilot study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010;141(8):995-99. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Dilsiz A, Canakci V, Ozdemir A, Kaya Y. Clinical evaluation of Nd:YAG and 685-nm diode laser therapy for desensitisation of teeth with gingival recession. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009;27(6):843-48. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
García-Godoy F. Dentin hypersensitivity: The effects of an arginine-calcium carbonate and fluoride desensitising dentifrice. Am J Dent. 2010;23(Sp Is):2A.
17.
Garcia-Delaney C, Abad-Sanchez D, Arnabat-Dominguez J, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Gay-Escoda C. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the photobiomodulation in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity after basic therapy. A randomised clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(5):e694. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Hashim NT, Gasmalla BG, Sabahelkheir AH, Awooda AM. Effect of the clinical application of the diode laser (810 nm) in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. BMC Research Notes. 2014;7(1):01-04.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59983.18073

Date of Submission: Sep 01, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Nov 03, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jan 12, 2023
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: Dec 27, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jan 07, 2023 (21%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com