Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 149091

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : EC07 - EC12 Full Version

Cervical Cytology-Histopathology Concordance and Role of Dual Immunomarkers in Biopsy Samples of Uterine Cervix: A Cross-sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital of West Bengal, India


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/70709.19741
Srimoyee Sen, Esha Mondal, Nazir Abdul Wasim, Manisha Sarkar, Asim Kumar Manna

1. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Pathology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Pathology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Government Medical College, Uluberia, West Bengal, Howrah, West Bengal, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. B C Roy Post Graduate Institute of Paediatric Sciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 5. Professor, Department of Pathology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Manisha Sarkar,
Flat-2C, Anushka Tower, 10/2A Umakanta Sen Lane, Kolkata-700030, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: manishasarkar1979@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths. Liquid-based cervical cytology enables the detection and diagnosis of the disease at an early stage. p40 is a specific immunomarker that distinguishes squamous cell carcinomas from other cervical carcinomas with glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation.

Aim: To determine the role of Liquid-based Cytology (LBC) in the early detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix and its concordance with histopathological findings.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IPGME&R), Kolkata, West Bengal, India, over a period of one year and six months (from October 2020 to March 2022). Cervical samples were collected from a total of 200 females, and the materials were processed using the BD SurePath™ LBC method. The cytologically confirmed cases were biopsied, and histopathological concordance was established. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for p40 and p63 was performed using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase method to differentiate between premalignant, malignant squamous, and glandular lesions of the uterine cervix. For quantitative analysis, all cells were counted in 10 random fields at 400x magnification, and p63 and p40 were expressed as a percentage of positive cells per the total number of counted cells. Cases were considered positive if 5% or more of the tumour cell nuclei showed brown nuclear staining. The mean percentage positivity of p63 and p40 nuclear staining of all the cases in each category was calculated for non neoplastic and precursor/neoplastic lesions of the cervix.

Results: Among the 200 cases evaluated by LBC, 169 (84.5%) were non neoplastic, and the remaining 31 (15.5%) were precursor/neoplastic lesions. The vast majority (126 cases, 63%) were inflammatory smears, followed by 20 cases (10%) that were Negative for Intraepithelial Lesion or Malignancy (NILM). Total of 40 cases were followed-up with biopsy and histopathology, and concordance with the cytological diagnosis was evaluated. Among 40 cases, 23 were precursor/neoplastic on histopathology, and seven cases that were non neoplastic on Histopathological Examination (HPE) had been correctly diagnosed on LBC, giving a concordance rate of 75%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of LBC were 92%, 46.6%, 74.1%, and 77.7%, respectively, considering histological diagnosis as the gold standard. Regarding IHC expression on histopathology, the mean positivity of p40 and p63 for non neoplastic lesions was 9.40% and 10.06%, and for precursor/neoplastic lesions, 47.44% and 46.4%, respectively. Adenocarcinoma-in-situ and adenocarcinoma were negative for both p40 and p63.

Conclusion: Cervical cytology is a less invasive, cost-effective, and simple procedure to diagnose cervical epithelial cell abnormalities. Cytological-histopathological concordance revealed that LBC is a sensitive diagnostic method. The comparison between non neoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the cervix revealed a statistically significant difference with respect to the mean percent positivity of p40 and p63 IHC staining. Both of these markers can be used to differentiate squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma of the cervix.

Keywords

Immunohistochemistry, Liquid based cytology, p40, p63, Uterine cervical neoplasm

Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women, with an estimated 342,000 deaths worldwide in 2020. The main cause of cervical carcinogenesis is Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) infection (1). Cervical cytology for cancer screening has significantly reduced mortality from cervical cancer as it detects precursor lesions effectively (2). Currently, The Bethesda System (TBS) of reporting cervical cytology is the worldwide accepted reporting format. TBS is a two-tiered system that classifies Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (SIL) as Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (LSIL), which includes HPV-induced changes and grade-1 Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN-I), and High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (HSIL), which includes CIN-II and CIN-III (3).

In the female genital tract, p63 is expressed in the basal and parabasal cells of cervical epithelium, and also in reserve cells at the transformation zone (4). p63 promotes squamous differentiation and is expressed in squamous cell carcinoma (5),(6). p40 is a specific immunomarker that distinguishes squamous cell carcinomas from adenocarcinoma, with a specificity of about 100% in lung carcinomas (7),(8). It has also been used for the detection of squamous differentiation as well as the exclusion of glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation in cervical carcinomas (9),(10).

LBC for cervical cancer screening has been shown to increase the detection rate for preneoplastic SIL equal to or greater than the conventional Papanicolaou smear method. Liquid-based collection and processing provide more representative cervical sampling than the conventional method. Liquid-based Pap test significantly reduces the unsatisfactory rate of Pap test slides and detects a significantly higher number of low- and high-grade squamous lesions when compared with the conventional Pap smear technique (11).

The aim of the present study was to determine the role of LBC in the early detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the uterine cervix and its concordance with histopathological findings. Also, to know the role of p40 and p63 dual markers in histopathological sections in differentiating cervical squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and the precancerous lesions.

Material and Methods

The prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Pathology in collaboration with the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics at a tertiary care hospital in West Bengal, India, over a period of one year and six months (from October 2020 to March 2022). All procedures performed in the current study were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments (IEC Memo No. IPGME&R/IEC/2021/012, Date: 02.02.2021).

Inclusion criteria: Women in the reproductive age group attending the Gynaecology and Obstetrics Outpatient Department (OPD) with complaints of abnormal vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge, and dyspareunia were included in this study.

Exclusion criteria: Pregnant women were excluded from the study.

Sample size: A total of 200 women were selected.

Study Procedure

Following a detailed clinical and radiological examination, a cervical sample was collected with a cytobrush, and the materials were processed using the BD SurePath™ LBC method. Slides labeled with the respective numbers of the vial were stained with the PrepStain machine. A provisional cytological diagnosis was made following TBS of reporting, which is the worldwide accepted reporting format for cervical smears. Cytologically suspicious lesions were biopsied, and histopathological diagnosis was made following the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2020 classification of neoplasms of the uterine cervix (12).

Cytological and histopathological diagnosis were associated and followed by IHC staining. IHC staining was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections using a detection system based on the peroxidase-antiperoxidase method. Heat-induced epitope retrieval and enzymatic activation of the chromogen were conducted to visualise the antigen-antibody reaction product. The p63 mouse monoclonal antibody (4A4 clone, Lot no- R07105OA, PathnSitu, USA) and the p40 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Lot no- R07123TA, PathnSitu, USA) were used. Positive tissue controls for p63 were benign prostatic hyperplasia and for p40 were basal cell carcinoma of the skin. The same tissue was used for the internal negative control for each case. All slides were examined under light microscopy by two independent observers. For quantitative analysis, all cells were counted in 10 random fields at 400x magnification, and the p63 and p40 were expressed as a percentage of positive cells per total number of counted cells (13). Cases were considered positive if 5% or more of the tumour cells showed strong brown nuclear staining. Less than 5% staining or no areas of brown staining were regarded as negative (14). The percentages of immunoreactive cells in each case were recorded, and the mean percentage positivity of p63 and p40 nuclear staining for each category was calculated in non neoplastic and precursor/neoplastic lesions of the cervix.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software program version 20.0. The Pearson Chi-square test was used to assess the association between the positivity of both markers in each category of preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions of the cervix, and p-values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

In the present study, the mean age of presentation was 44 years, and the most common presenting complaint was white discharge per vagina (82 cases, 41%). In LBC out of a total of 200 cases, cytological diagnosis of neoplastic and non neoplastic is shown in (Table/Fig 1).

A total of 40 cases were cytologically diagnosed, including ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL (Table/Fig 2), HSIL (Table/Fig 3), SCC, AGC, inflammation with necrosis, and atrophic smear with necrosis; these cases underwent cervical biopsy or hysterectomy and were evaluated histologically. Among these 40 cases, in which cytological-histological concordance was done, 25 had precancerous or neoplastic lesions, and their mean age was 49.6 years. The minimum and maximum ages found were 35 years and 72 years, respectively. The most common premalignant lesion on histology was CIN-1 (6 out of 40 cases), and the most common malignant lesion was squamous cell carcinoma (6 out of 40 cases) (Table/Fig 4).

On histopathology, 15 patients (37.5%) had non neoplastic lesions, which included chronic non specific cervicitis, atrophic cervicitis, squamous metaplasia, cervical endometriosis, and endocervical polyps. Neoplastic or precursor lesions were seen in 25 patients (62.5%), which included CIN I (15%), CIN II (10%), CIN III (5%) (Table/Fig 5), squamous cell carcinoma (15%) (Table/Fig 6), adenocarcinoma-in-situ (5%), adenocarcinoma (7.5%) (Table/Fig 7), and adeno-squamous carcinoma (5%) (Table/Fig 4).

In this study, seven cases were cytologically diagnosed as inflammatory. On histopathology, four were confirmed to be chronic non specific cervicitis, one was a cervical polyp, one was squamous cell carcinoma, and one was adenocarcinoma. Two cytological diagnosis of atrophic smears were proven to be atrophic on histopathological examination. Out of the two cases diagnosed as ASC-US, one was squamous metaplasia, and the other was CIN-I on histology. Among the two cases diagnosed as ASC-H, one was a case of cervical endometriosis, and the other was CIN-II on histology. In this study, there were five cases of AGC, out of which one was confirmed to be chronic non specific cervicitis on final histopathological examination, two were Adenocarcinoma In-Situ (AIS), and the other two were adenocarcinoma. Twenty-three out of the 40 cases that were precursor/neoplastic on histopathology, and seven cases that were non neoplastic on HPE, had been correctly diagnosed on LBC, giving a concordance rate of 75%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of LBC were 92%, 46.6%, 74.1%, and 77.7%, respectively, considering histological diagnosis as the gold standard.

The percentage positivity of p40 and p63 was calculated in non neoplastic, precancerous, and neoplastic lesions of the cervix using IHC stain. In non neoplastic lesions of the cervix, the positivity of p40 ranged from 1% to 50%, with a mean of 9.40%. In precursor/neoplastic lesions, the mean positivity for p40 was 47.44%. For p63 in non neoplastic lesions of the cervix, positivity ranged from 2% to 54%, with a mean of 10.06%. In precursor/neoplastic lesions, the mean positivity for p63 was 46.4%. AIS and adenocarcinoma showed no expression of p40 and p63; however, CIN-III and squamous cell carcinoma (Table/Fig 8)a,b,(Table/Fig 9)a,b displayed 100% immunoexpression (Table/Fig 10). The difference in the expression of p40 between non neoplastic and precursor/neoplastic lesions of the cervix was found to be statistically significant (p-value=0.003). Similarly, p63 expression also showed a statistically significant difference between these two groups (p-value=0.005).

Discussion

Cervical cancer is common in developing countries like India. With the implementation of cervical screening and diagnostic programs, its mortality has decreased over the past 50 years. In the present study, most of the patients were in the age group 41-50 years (28%), which was similar to the study done by Bindroo S et al., who found the maximum number of patients in the age group of 41-50 years (32%) (15). Inflammatory smears (63%) and NILM (10%) were the most common cytological diagnosis, which were consistent with studies done by Chandru C and Sheela SR (16). NILM was the predominant category (49% of cases) in a study done by Singal P et al., (17). In the present study, inflammatory smear was the most common cytological diagnosis due to the small sample size resulting from COVID-19 restrictions, and the fact that patients mostly presented with specific complaints rather than for routine screening.

A cytology smear of ASC-US shows predominantly atypia in the superficial and intermediate groups of cells with a mild increase in nuclear size and nucleocytoplasmic ratio. The ASC-H cases closely resemble HSIL, but the cytological criteria are not sufficient to interpret them as HSIL. Cells in LSIL (Table/Fig 2) are usually present singly or in small clusters, with mild nuclear enlargement, irregular nuclear contour, and a low nucleocytoplasmic ratio. Cells in HSIL (Table/Fig 3) are usually round with scanty cytoplasm and a high nucleocytoplasmic ratio, along with enlarged, pleomorphic-hyperchromatic nuclei. A smear of SCC shows discrete and small groups of malignant cells with moderately pleomorphic, hyperchromatic nuclei and irregularly clumped chromatin. Spindle-shaped fiber cells with elongated hyperchromatic nuclei are noted. Discrete and small groups of cells with crowded nuclei are seen in a smear of AGC. In these cases, the cytoplasm is vacuolated with a distinct cell border, and the nuclei are mildly pleomorphic (3).

Histopathological findings of chronic cervicitis and chronic cervicitis with squamous metaplasia were seen in the majority of the women (52.9%), followed by CIN I in 16.8% of the women in a study done by Vidyadhar S et al., which was very close to present study findings (18). Another study done by Dhakal R et al., found 78.7% of cases of chronic cervicitis, 8% with cervical dysplasia, and 5.3% with malignancy (19).

In this study, the concordance between cytology and histopathology was evaluated in the 40 patients who underwent cervical biopsy/hysterectomy. True positives were 23, where both the cytological and histopathological diagnosis was premalignant and malignant. True negatives were seven, where both the cytological and histopathological diagnosis was non neoplastic. False positives were eight, where the cytological diagnosis was premalignant and malignant, but on histopathology, lesions turned out to be non neoplastic. False negatives were two, where the cytological diagnosis was non neoplastic, but the histopathological diagnosis was neoplastic lesions (Table/Fig 4).

The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the present study were 92%, 46.6%, 74.1%, and 77.7%, respectively, which was close to a study done by Sirasagi AK et al., who found 90.57% sensitivity, 62.50% specificity, and 95.41% PPV (20). In a study done by Sinha A et al., the sensitivity, specificity, and PPV were 90.9%, 89.5%, and 83.3% for cervical cytology (21). The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of Pap smear in diagnosing cervical dysplasia and malignancy were 86.61%, 73.33%, 96.49%, and 39.29%, respectively, in a study done by Malpani G et al., whereas Mellonie P et al., found 81.3% sensitivity and 92% specificity (22),(23). The sensitivity of cervical PAP smear was 29.7%, specificity was 94.4%, PPV was 70.4%, and NPV was 75.1% for diagnosing premalignant lesions of the cervix in a study done by Vidyadhar S et al., (18). Cytohistological correlation of 100 cases done by Sharma A and Singh S revealed an overall sensitivity of 95.60%, specificity of 77.78%, PPV of 97.75%, and NPV of 63.03% (24). A correlative study of Pap smear and histopathological examination of the cervix by Selvanayaki KM and Archana A revealed a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 74% (25), and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 69.7%, 79.9%, 60.5%, and 85.6% in a study done by Sandhya DS et al., (26).

The diagnostic accuracy of cytology in present study to determine non neoplastic and precursors or neoplastic lesions of the cervix was 75%, which was close to the findings of Sandhya DS et al., who found 76.6%, and Singhal A et al., who found 79.4% of diagnostic accuracy (26),(27). The Chandru C and Sheela SR was 81.71% and Sharma A and Singh S was 94% (16),(24).

Present study investigated the expression of p40 and p63 in non neoplastic, precursor, and neoplastic lesions of the cervix. In non neoplastic lesions of the cervix, the mean positivity of p40 was 9.40%, while in precursor/neoplastic lesions, the positivity was 47.44%. Meanwhile, the mean positivity for p63 was 10.06% in non neoplastic lesions and 46.4% in precursor or neoplastic lesions.

According to the study, AIS and adenocarcinoma showed no expression of p40 and p63, whereas CIN III and squamous cell carcinoma exhibited 100% expression. Limited studies have been conducted on the expression of p40 and p63 in cervical lesions. One such study by Jacob AA and Sundaram A found p63 to be a useful marker in determining the progression of a lesion. They concluded that p63 could differentiate between benign and malignant cervical lesions (28). Vosmik M et al., analysed 70 patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma and discovered that 94.29% (66/70) had positive expression of p63 (29). Das L et al., found that the percentage of p63-positive cells was highest in carcinomas, followed by dysplasia. They suggested that the malignant potential of dysplastic conditions might be correlated with the upregulation of p63 protein (30). In a study conducted by Li H et al., the sensitivity of p40 and p63 was reported as 85.15% and 89.11%, respectively, while the specificity was 97.22% and 93.52%, respectively, in distinguishing between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (31).

Limitation(s)

The present study was single-institute-based, and the number of cases was limited due to COVID-19 restrictions. The short duration and the fact that patients mostly visited with definite complaints were the major limitations of this study.

Conclusion

Cervical cytology is a less invasive, cost-effective, and simple procedure to diagnose cervical epithelial cell abnormalities. Timely intervention and appropriate treatment can reduce the burden of disease. LBC is a sensitive method for the early detection of neoplasms of the uterine cervix. When cytological diagnosis were correlated with histopathological findings, they were found to be more sensitive, with an accuracy rate of about 75%. Non neoplastic, precursor, or neoplastic lesions of the cervix can be distinguished by p40 and p63 immunostaining. These markers can also be used to differentiate poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma of the cervix on histopathology. However, further studies in routine health screening patients would be required to establish whether adding p63 and p40 staining has a role in asymptomatic patients with clearly negative cytology. This study might be reviewed as a component of a large multicentre study to reach a definite conclusion in the future.

References

1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ellenson LH, Pirog EC. The Female Genital Tract. In: Kumar V, editor. Robbins And Cortan Pathologic Basis Of Disease. South Asia Edition: Elsevier; 2020:1000.
3.
Dey P. Cervical Carcinogenesis, Preneoplastic and Neoplastic Condition. In: Dey P, editor. Diagnostic Cytology. New Delhi: Jaypee; 2022:121-34.
4.
Ranade AV, Chougule MV, Kadam N, Kulkarni SH, Khatavkar PR. Expression of p63 among cervical carcinoma patients. J Adv Med Dent Scie Res. 2021;9(5):66-68.
5.
Truong AB, Kretz M, Ridky TW, Kimmel R, Khavari PA. p63 regulates proliferation and differentiation of developmentally mature keratinocytes. Genes Dev. 2006;20(22):3185-97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1463206. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Barbieri CE, Tang LJ, Brown KA, Pietenpol JA. Loss of p63 leads to increased cell migration and up-regulation of genes involved in invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2006;66(15):7589-97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Downey P, Cummins R, Moran M, Gulmann C. If it’s not CK5/6 positive, TTF-1 negative it’s not a squamous cell carcinoma of lung. APMIS. 2008;116(6):526-29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2008.00932.x. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Nobre AR, Albergaria A, Schmitt F. p40: A p63 isoform useful for lung cancer diagnosis - A review of the physiological and pathological role of p63. Acta Cytol. 2013;57(1):01-08. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1159/000345245. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Bishop JA, Teruya-Feldstein J, Westra WH, Pelosi G, Travis WD, Rekhtman N. p40 (ΔNp63) is superior to p63 for the diagnosis of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:405-15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2011.173. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Lin Z, Liu M, Li Z, Kim C, Lee E, Kim I. DeltaNp63 protein expression in uterine cervical and endometrial cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006;132(12):811-16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-006-0130-8. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Bentz JS. Liquid based cytology for cervical cancer screening. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2005;5(6):857-71. Doi: 10.1586/14737159.5.6.857. PMID: 16255628. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Herrington CS, Kim KR, Kong CS. Tumours of the Uterine Cervix. In Female Genital Tumours. 5th edition, Lyon: World Health Organization; 2020:8.
13.
Romus I, Triningsih FE, Mangunsudirdjo S, Harijadi A. Clinicopathology significance of p53 and p63 expression in Indonesian cervical squamous cell carcinomas. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(12):7737-41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.12.7737. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Affandi KA, Tizen NMS, Mustangin M, Zin RRMRM. p40 Immunohistochemistry is an excellent marker in primary lung squamous cell carcinoma. J Pathol Transl Med. 2018;52(5):283-89. Doi: 10.4132/jptm.2018.08.14. PMID: 30235512; PMCID: PMC6166010. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Bindroo S, Garg M, Gitika. Correlation of cervical pap smear with histopathological diagnosis in cervical lesions: A 2 years retrospective study. Int J Contemp Med. 2019;6(7):17-20. [crossref]
16.
Chandru C, Sheela SR. Screening for carcinoma cervix by comparing pap smear cytology, histopathology with colposcopy in unhealthy cervix. J Clin of Diagn Res. 2021;15(12):QC01-QC05. [crossref]
17.
Singal P, Kumar N, Kundal D, Singh K, Kumar R, Kaur M. Cytological, HPV genome, and histopathological correlation of cervical smears in females 30 years and above. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2022;15(5):41-45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2022.v15i5.44328. [crossref]
18.
Vidyadhar S, Bhattacharya AB, Bohara S, Dwivedi AD, Agarwal A, Gangwar D. Comparison and correlation of cytology, colposcopy and histopathology of premalignant lesions of cervix in rural women of Barabanki district. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2017;16:13-18. [crossref]
19.
Dhakal R, Makaju R, Sharma S, Bhandari S, Shrestha S, Bastakoti R. Correlation of cervical pap smear with biopsy in the lesion of cervix. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2016;55(3):254-57.
20.
Sirasagi AK, Arpitha K, Neha S, Pattar PM. A two year retrospective study of cytohistopathological correlation of cervical smear in a tertiary care hospital. Asian J Med Sci. 2021;12(8):144-48. [crossref]
21.
Sinha A, Kafle SU, Singh M, Kafle N. Variation of cervical cytology by pap smear and its correlation with cervical biopsy in patients attending Birat Medical College teaching hospital, Morang, Nepal. Birat J Health Sci. 2021;6(3):1615-20. [crossref]
22.
Malpani G, Agrawal P, Varma AV, Khandelwal N, Tignath G. Cervical pap smear study and detection of abnormal epithelial lesions and determination of its accuracy by cytohistological correlation in patients of tertiary care teaching hospital in central India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:2312-16. [crossref]
23.
Mellonie P, Sharon MP, Richie AJ. Correlation of PAP smear with cervical biopsy in malignant and non malignant lesions of cervix. Saudi J Pathol Microbiol. 2019;4(2):116-19.
24.
Sharma A, Singh S. Spectrum of cervical lesions and cytohistological correlation: A study in tertiary care center. Int J Contemp Med. 2019;6(6):F5-F10.[crossref]
25.
Selvanayaki KM, Archana A. A comparative study of pap smear cytology and histopathology of cervix biopsy. Trop J Pathol Microbiol. 2020;6(3):230-37. [crossref]
26.
Sandhya DS, Sumaya, Nagesha KR. Cytodiagnostic study of papanicolaou smears with histopathological correlation- An emphasis on 2014 Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology. Saudi J Pathol Microbiol. 2019; 4(6): 443-449.
27.
Singhal A, Raina RK, Verma S, Verma A. Predictive accuracy of cervical cytology and colposcopy in diagnosing premalignant and malignant cervical lesions: A hospital-based study from the sub-Himalayan region of Indian subcontinent. CHRISMED J Health Res. 2019;6:39-43. [crossref]
28.
Jacob AA, Sundaram A. P16, Ki67 and P63 staining pattern in squamous metaplasia, CIN and cervical cancer. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6:882-88. [crossref]
29.
Vosmik M, Laco J, Sirak I, Beranek M, Hovorkova E, Vosmikova H, et al. Prognostic significance of human papillomavirus (HPV) status and expression of selected markers (HER2/neu, EGFR, VEGF, CD34, p63, p53 and Ki67/MIB-1) on outcome after (chemo-) radiotherapy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Pathol Oncol Res. 2014;20(1):131-37. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Das L, Naskar S, Sarkar T, Maiti AK, Das S, Chatterjee J. Immunohistochemical evaluation of prime molecules in cervical lesions towards assessment of malignant potentiality. J Can Res Ther. 2018;14:377-81. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.158029. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Li H, Jing X, Yu J, Liu J, Zhang T, Chen S, et al. A combination of cytokeratin 5/6, p63, p40 and MUC5AC are useful for distinguishing squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Diagn Pathol. 2020;15(1):104.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/70709.19741

Date of Submission: Mar 15, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Apr 24, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 26, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 15, 2024
• Manual Googling: Apr 26, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 25, 2024 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com