Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 165077

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : KC01 - KC07 Full Version

Comparative Analysis of Musculoskeletal Responses in Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Patients: A Study on Retro-walking Treadmill Protocols using an Experimental Design


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/71100.19709
Chhavi Chaturvedi, Priyanka Rishi, Snigdha Tiwari, Saurabh Kumar

1. Student, Faculty of Physiotherapy, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 2. Associate Professor, Faculty of Physiotherapy, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Physiotherapy, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 4. Associate Professor, Faculty of Physiotherapy, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Priyanka Rishi,
Associate Professor, Faculty of Physiotherapy, SGT University, Gurugram-122505, Haryana, India.
E-mail: prnk.rishi@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) is a significant cause of disability globally and is rapidly becoming a major health issue. The part of the knee most affected by OA is the patellofemoral joint. This type of arthritis poses challenges for both patients and healthcare providers in managing symptoms and improving the quality of life for those affected. However, there’s a lack of data on specific therapies for the patellofemoral joint.

Aim: To investigate if a varied frequency treadmill exercises protocol involving retro-walking has a greater impact on musculoskeletal responses, leading to better improvements in individuals with symptomatic Patellofemoral Joint Osteoarthritis (PFOA).

Materials and Methods: The present study was an experimental research design i.e., between -subjects experimental design in which 60 participants with patellofemoral arthritis were enrolled based on the inclusion criteria. The study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedics, SGT Medical College Hospital and Research Institute in Gurugram, Haryana, India for a duration of one year (May 2022- May 2023). Participants were randomly randomised to three distinct exercise program groups with varying intensity levels for retro-walking on a treadmill for six weeks, and all three groups received conventional treatment six days/week for six weeks. All participants were evaluated at three-time intervals of baseline, at the end of the third week, and after intervention (end of the sixth week) for the evaluation of several musculoskeletal parameters affecting patellofemoral arthritis. Statistical analysis was carried out using the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Comparison for within group differences between various outcome measures at various intervals of time was done using repeated measures of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc analysis for mean values with Least Significant Difference (LSD) whereas for between group analysis One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Analysis for mean values was done with p-value set at <0.05.

Result: Significant statistical and clinical differences were observed in musculoskeletal responses, Q-angle (p-value=0.001) and popliteal angle (p-value=0.001) in the high frequency group (group C) performing the protocol five times a week for six weeks leading to a better quality of life followed by group B and group A, respectively.

Conclusion: The main finding of the present study suggested that the dosage for retro-walking on treadmill among patients with patellofemoral arthritis requires at least walking for five times/week for six weeks to get more clinical improvement in Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSD).

Keywords

Musculoskeletal abnormalities, Osteoarthritis knee, Patellofemoral pain syndrome, Treadmill test

The MSDs are the second-leading cause of disability worldwide, according to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study (1). The burden of age-related MSDs varies, with approximately 20-33% of individuals worldwide experiencing pain associated with these disorders (2). Arthritis is a notable MSD that significantly contributes to the overall disability burden worldwide (1). OA affects approximately 50% of all MSDs. Among individuals aged 60 years and above worldwide, the knee is the most affected joint in cases of OA and causes severe financial burden and mobility difficulties (3). Most notably, knee OA symptoms are more likely to arise from the patellofemoral joint than from the tibiofemoral joint. Even isolated, moderate radiographic PFOA can generate significant symptoms that significantly affect daily living activities (3). PFOA is a disorder that affects the knee joint, resulting in pain, stiffness, and reduced function. PFOA, a common form of OA, presents substantial challenges for both patients and healthcare practitioners in terms of symptom management and increasing the quality of life for individuals affected. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in exploring alternate and focused exercise programs to reduce the impact of PFOA. Both low- and high-income countries are gradually seeing an increase in the prevalence of PFOA (4). Symptoms are reported by 9.6% of men and 18% of women (5) with a gradual onset of symptoms, often in an asymmetrical pattern. The primary and most prominent symptom of OA is pain, which is occasionally described as a deep ache (6). Weight-bearing joints are typically aggravated by standing and walking, while rest tends to provide relief. Although pain is usually intermittent, it can become persistent over time. In knee OA, localised pain is frequently experienced below the patellofemoral attachment or along the inner joint line. As patellofemoral arthritis progresses, joint mobility becomes increasingly restricted (7). The loss of movement and function often prompts patients to seek frequent medical attention, along with the presence of pain. Diminished mobility can make it more challenging to carry out daily tasks, including walking and engaging in household chores. Walking is a type of exercise that uses the closed kinetic chain, allowing for early mobilisation and weight bearing during knee rehabilitation (8). For those with knee OA, regular walking activities are helpful and advised to lessen pain and disability. Existing studies that have investigated possible differences between Forward Walking (FW) and Backward Walking (BW) have shown that there are no appreciable differences between the two and that BW is simply FW mirrored (9),(10),(11). Utthoff A et al., reported that only a small number of earlier studies examined the effects of BW; the majority of studies examined the effects of backward running (12). Prior research has indicated that in healthy adults, the program of backward running may provide benefits beyond those of forward running. Retro-walking is thought to be a useful closed kinetic chain workout for enhancing the strength of the body’s lower muscles and equilibrium. According to a Masumoto K et al., backward running preserves isometric and concentric quadriceps activity while reducing eccentric activity (13). Given that 2021-2030 has been designated as the decade of healthy ageing by the World Health Organisation (WHO), it is critical to give equal weight to life expectancy and quality of life (14).

Considering all the factors the primary objective of the current study was to close current knowledge gaps on the best exercise regimens for patients with patellofemoral arthritis by thoroughly examining varied frequency treadmill training at three different frequency levels while retro-walking and also comparing them. With the research hypothesis stating that the different frequencies (low, intermediate and high frequency) will have a significant effect on the various musculoskeletal parameters (pain, popliteal angle, Q-angle, balance, muscle strength, ROM, Cadence and functional disability) and a predetermined treadmill walking dosage meant to enhance positive impacts on patients and improve their general wellbeing. This study intends to provide insightful information about the development of evidence-based exercise therapy for improving PFOA and forms the basis for cause and effect relationship among patellofemoral arthritis and musculoskeletal parameters. Comprehending the impact of varying exercise frequencies on musculoskeletal results is important in creating rehabilitation plans customised to the specific requirements of patients suffering from PFOA.

Material and Methods

The study employed an experimental study design and was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics, SGT Medical College Hospital and Research Institute in Gurugram, Haryana, India. It spanned one year (from May 2022 to May 2023) and involved randomly allocating subjects into three experimental groups. Sealed closed envelope method was done in 1:1 allocation ratio. The study received approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) of SGT University’s Faculty of Physiotherapy (SGTU/FPHY/2022/424). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Ethical standards adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, 1964.

Inclusion criteria: Individuals aged between 50 and 70 years diagnosed with PFOA, experiencing unilateral knee pain for at least three months, and scoring 5 or less on the NPRS scale (15) were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: A history of recent knee surgery, severe knee pain inhibiting treadmill exercise, cardiopulmonary conditions, neurological disorders, inflammatory joint diseases, balance problems, or reliance on assistive devices for ambulation were excluded from the study.

Sample size estimation: A total of 65 subjects were screened for participating in the study. Using an effect size of d 0.5, alpha err prob 0.05, and power (1-Beta err Prob) 0.6, the G Power program version 3.19 was used to compute the sample size for the current study. Based in the effect size estimates, a total sample size of 60 participants were recruited with 20 participants each in group A (low frequency group), group B (intermediate frequency group) and group C (high frequency group).

Outcome measure: The outcome measures used in the study are shown in (Table/Fig 1) (16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22). (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3) shows Q-angle and popliteal angle measurement using universal goniometer.

Study Procedure

Convenience sampling was used to choose participants at random. Before any testing, the participants were given a thorough explanation of the process and their informed consent was obtained. The present study was carried out at the SGT University Hospital’s Physiotherapy OPD. As shown in (Table/Fig 4), the study included participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The subjects gave written consent prior to the treatment. Following a preliminary examination, each participant in the study was randomly allocated to one of three groups: group A (low frequency group; that is, twice a week), group B (intermediate frequency group; that is, three times a week), or group C (high frequency group; that is, five times a week). An assessment was made on the baseline measurement. All the groups followed the protocol and data was collected at the three timelines i.e., baseline, at the end of 3rd week and end of 6th week after intervention.

Treadmill Protocol-15 Minutes (Table/Fig 5) (19):

Day 0- For five minutes, a practice session was provided to help with skill adaptation and preferred walking speed selection.

Consecutive days: Same protocol was followed by all the three experimental groups but with different frequency depending on the Group.

• Three minutes of retro-walking on a treadmill set at 0% incline for initial three minutes.
• Raise the speed to the permitted level and maintain it for five minutes at 0% inclination.
• Keep walking at the same pace for the next five minutes, but increase the incline by 10%.
• Lower the inclination to 0% and progressively lower the pace for the final two minutes until the treadmill stops.

Conventional Protocol (9): All the three experimental groups received the conventional treatment on all six days for six weeks.

Conventional treatment, where the participant was lying supine, and a hot pack was applied to the knee for 10 minutes. Following that, this group followed the exercise program which included the combination of open kinetic chain and closed kinetic chain exercises which are:

1. Static quads exercise (3 sets×10 rep)
2. Dynamic quads exercise (3 sets×10 rep)
3. Knee bending (3 sets×10 rep)
4. Hip extension (3 sets×10 rep)
5. Hip abduction (3 sets×10 rep)

Each exercise was given for five minute and each conventional treatment session was administered for 35 minutes daily.

Statistical Analysis

IBM SPSS 26.0 for Windows Version was used to statistically analyse the pain, Q-angle, popliteal angle measurement, knee ROM, functional impairment, dynamic balance, muscle strength, and cadence of 60 patients. For this aim, data was entered into an Excel spreadsheet, tabulated, and statistical analysis was carried out. The mean and standard deviation of each variable were established. The results were deemed statistically significant at p<0.05.

Comparison for within group differences between various outcome measures at various intervals of time-baseline, end of three weeks of treatment and end of six weeks of treatment for all groups was done using repeated measures of ANOVA and post-hoc analysis for mean values was done with LSD whereas for between group analysis One-way ANOVA and post-hoc analysis for mean values was done.

Results

A total of 60 patients with PFOA were recruited for the present study, comprising 36 females and 24 males. Group A had a mean age of 58.40±9.26 years, while group B had a mean age of 59.80±7.02 years and group C had a mean age of 61.70±7.83 years. Descriptive analysis was conducted to assess the age and gender distribution in both groups. No significant age difference was observed between the groups. Regarding gender distribution, group A included 9 males (45%) and 11 females (55%), while group B included eight males (40%) and 12 females (60%) whereas group C included 13 females (65%) and seven males (35%). There was no significant difference in gender distribution between the groups. (Table/Fig 6) displays the demographics of the participants in Groups A, B, and C.

The comparison of mean NPRS values at baseline and at the end of the 3rd week and 6th week after treatment between group A, group B and group C is shown in (Table/Fig 7). The NPRS scores comparison between group A, group B and group C demonstrated highly significant postintervention values (p-value<0.0001) at 3rd week as well as in 6th week. A statistical difference in the mean values of the Q-angle and Popliteal angle postintervention between group A, group B and C at the end of 3rd and 6th week was also observed. Similarly, a highly significant difference was found in the mean values of knee ROM, Dynamic Balance and WOMAC scores postintervention (p-value<0.0001) using an One-way anova at the end of the 3rd week and 6th week after treatment between group A, group B and group C as shown in (Table/Fig 7).

The comparison of post-hoc analysis of NPRS, Q-angle, knee ROM, popliteal angle, dynamic balance, WOMAC and Cadence score at end of 3rd week and end of 6th week between the groups is shown in (Table/Fig 8) to infer the specific time interval where the difference was observed on comparison between group A vs group B vs group C.

The comparison of mean muscle strength of hip and knee values at baseline and at the end of the 3rd week and 6th week after treatment between group A, group B and group C is shown in (Table/Fig 9). The muscle strength scores comparison between group A, group B and group C demonstrated highly significant postintervention values (p-value< 0.0001) on flexors and extensors group of knee muscles at 3rd week as well as in 6th week. A One-way ANOVA revealed a statistical difference in the mean values of the hip muscle strength of flexors, extensors, abductors and adductors postintervention between group A, group B and C at the end of 3rd and 6th week as shown in (Table/Fig 9).

The comparison of post-hoc analysis of the muscle strength scores of knee and hip musculature at end of 3rd week and end of 6th week between the groups is shown in (Table/Fig 10) to infer the specific time interval where the difference was observed on comparison between group A vs group B vs group C.

Discussion

This study aimed to assess the impact of different frequencies of treadmill exercise protocols on various musculoskeletal parameters during retro-walking in individuals with PFOA. The results indicated that the high frequency group, which engaged in retro-walking on a treadmill five times a week for six weeks alongside conventional treatment, experienced significant reductions in pain and improvements in the Q-angle, popliteal angle, knee ROM, dynamic balance, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and cadence. This improvement was particularly notable among participants aged 40-70 years.

The findings suggest that group C showed the most substantial improvement, followed by group A and B, respectively, after the third and sixth weeks of the retro-walking treadmill program. One possible explanation is that retro-walking on a treadmill could alleviate pain by triggering the endogenous opioid system. This system releases natural opioids like endorphins, which can help alleviate pain. Supporting this idea, Kuptniratsaikul V et al., reported that a four-week aerobic exercise regimen, which included retro-walking on a treadmill, raised plasma beta-endorphin levels in individuals with knee OA (23). The rise in beta-endorphins was linked to enhancements in pain severity and physical performance. Alghadir AH et al., inferred that the biomechanical actions of the muscles around the knee and ankle were reversed during retro-walking (4). During retro-walking, the knee plays a significant role as the primary power generator, engaging the hamstring, quadriceps, and ankle plantar flexors to absorb stress. This movement also results in anterior shear stress at the knee joint, contrasting with the posterior shear stress experienced during forward walking. Retro-walking notably reduces the patellar compressive force compared to forward walking. Walking, a widely accessible and affordable form of physical exercise is known to help alleviate symptoms of depression, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. In this study, significant improvements in the Q-angle were observed in group B and highly significant improvements in group C. The Q-angle, which measures the alignment of the patella in relation to the femur, is associated with the risk of knee pain and OA. Retro-walking on a treadmill has been found to improve the Q-angle in knee OA patients, likely through various physiological mechanisms. Alghadir AH et al., suggested that retro-walking on a treadmill may enhance quadriceps muscle strength and activation (4). The enhancements in quadriceps muscle strength and activation were linked to a reduction in the Q-angle, indicating that retro-walking on a treadmill may enhance the Q-angle by improving quadriceps muscle function. This improvement was also observed in the knee ROM in group C, followed by group A and B, respectively, after the 3rd and 6th week of the retro-walking treadmill program. Retro-walking has the potential to enhance neuromuscular control thereby improving knee ROM. Neuromuscular control refers to the nervous system’s ability to regulate muscle activity. Patients with knee OA often experience reduced neuromuscular control, which can lead to decreased knee ROM and increased pain. Retro-walking may improve neuromuscular control, resulting in enhanced knee ROM and reduced pain (24). Retro-walking has shown promise in enhancing joint flexibility, especially in the knee joint. Individuals with knee OA often suffer from reduced joint flexibility, which can restrict knee ROM and exacerbate pain. Retro-walking has been found to enhance joint flexibility, thereby improving knee ROM and reducing pain. The findings of Chand D et al., align with present study, indicating that retro-walking on a treadmill can enhance knee joint flexibility and is linked to increased knee ROM in knee OA patients (25). The current study’s findings were statistically significant (p-value<0.05), indicating that the intervention had a notable effect, particularly in group C, followed by group A and B. Retro-walking on a treadmill involves a distinct knee joint movement pattern compared to forward walking. This movement can aid joint mobilisation, reducing stiffness, and enhancing joint lubrication. These effects may lead to increased knee ROM and could potentially influence the popliteal angle (26). The findings suggest that group C showed the most significant improvement, followed by group A and B, respectively, after the 3rd and 6th weeks of the retro-walking treadmill program. Baby E and Thachil A proposed that one of the primary mechanisms by which retro-walking enhances balance in patients with knee OA is by activating ankle extensor muscles like the gastrocnemius and soleus (27). During retro-walking, the muscles responsible for plantarflexion, which is the downward movement of the foot toward the ground, are particularly active. This is because the body’s weight is shifted backward during retro-walking, requiring these muscles to work harder compared to forward walking. The increased activation of these ankle extensor muscles helps stabilise the ankle joint and improve balance. The current study found significant improvement between the groups, as shown by the statistical analysis. Retro-walking involves various muscle groups, including the quadriceps, hamstrings, glutes, and calves. This finding aligns with a study by Fitzgerald GK et al., which concluded that regular retro-walking can activate and strengthen these muscles, crucial for supporting joint stability and functional movements. Enhanced muscle strength and endurance can improve functional performance, reduce disability, and the study demonstrated that muscle strength improvement yielded significant results in all groups (28). Plotkin DL et al., observed muscle transitions during exercise training, noting that walking can activate both slow-twitch (Type I) and fast-twitch (Type II) muscle fibers. Slow-twitch fibers are resistant to fatigue and crucial for endurance, whereas fast-twitch fibers are responsible for generating force and power (29). Participating in retro-walking can activate a wider range of muscle fibers, enhancing muscle strength. Additionally, research by Suetta C et al., demonstrated that retro-walking could challenge neuromuscular control, coordination, and balance (30). The repetitive backward movement involved in retro-walking stimulates neural pathways that enhance muscle coordination and motor unit recruitment. This stimulation can lead to improved muscle activation patterns and more efficient muscle contractions, ultimately increasing muscle strength. Present study demonstrated a significant improvement in cadence across all groups. Korkmaz C and Toy AB suggested that retro-walking, which entails walking backward, may enhance knee flexion during the swing phase of gait (31). This greater knee flexion could lead to longer strides and possibly increase the pace, improving balance. Another suggested reason is that retro-walking involves several muscle groups like the quadriceps, hamstrings, glutes, and calves. With repetitive backward walking, these muscles can develop better coordination and timing, resulting in more effective muscle activation patterns during walking. Improved muscle activation can increase force and power production, allowing for a quicker and more consistent pace (32). This study will help the physiotherapists to use different frequency treadmill exercise protocol in patients with PFOA patients as rehabilitative intervention in a clinical setting with appropriate dosage of treatment protocol. Implementing long-term follow-up assessments to evaluate the sustained effects of the interventions over time and incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to capture participants’ perspectives on treatment effectiveness, quality of life, and satisfaction with the interventions can be studied in the future.

Limitation(s)

The present study had some potential limitations. First, due to lack of power with three small groups, this study might have been underpowered to detect a significant effect of each treatment group and there was no control group. Only patellofemoral arthritis was included. Making participants walk on treadmill requires more monitoring of other cardiovascular or any other associated complications so monitoring needs to be very comprehensive.

Conclusion

The effect of three different frequency treadmill exercise protocol significantly improved pain, Q-angle, popliteal angle, knee ROM, functional disability, dynamic balance, muscle strength and cadence outcomes during retro-walking in PFOA patients. Moreover, this study concluded that there was a highly significant improvement in Group C followed by Group A and B respectively after 3rd and 6th week of retro-walking treadmill program.

Contribution of Author: CC: Conception and design of the study; PR: Analysis and interpretation of data; ST: Drafting of the article; SK: Final drafting of manuscript.

References

1.
Steinmetz JD, Culbreth GT, Haile LM, Rafferty Q, Lo J, Fukutaki KG, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990-2020 and projections to 2050: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5(9):e508-22.
2.
WHO. World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization. 2015. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Sep 20]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565042.
3.
Crossley KM, Hinman RS. The patellofemoral joint: The forgotten joint in knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19(7):765-67. [crossref]
4.
Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Sarkar B, Paul AK, Anwar D. Effect of 6-week retro or forward walking program on pain, functional disability, quadriceps muscle strength, and performance in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial (retro-walking trial). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019;20(1):159. [crossref]
5.
Jaiswal A, Goswami K, Haldar P, Salve HR, Singh U. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, its determinants, and impact on the quality of life in elderly persons in rural Ballabgarh, Haryana. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(1):354-60. [crossref]
6.
Mease PJ, Hanna S, Frakes EP, Altman RD. Pain mechanisms in osteoarthritis: Understanding the role of central pain and current approaches to its treatment. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(8):1546-51. [crossref]
7.
Bijlsma JW, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FP. Osteoarthritis: An update with relevance for clinical practice. Lancet. 2011;377(9783):2115-26. [crossref]
8.
Lo GH, Vinod S, Richard MJ, Harkey MS, McAlindon TE, Kriska AM, et al. Association between walking for exercise and symptomatic and structural progression in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: Data from the osteoarthritis initiative cohort. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74(10):1660-67. [crossref]
9.
Nayyar M, Yadav J, Rishi P. Effect of retro walking on pain, balance and functional performance in osteoarthritis of knee. International Editorial Advisory Board. 2015;9(3):154. [crossref]
10.
Chen LY, Su FC, Chiang PY. Kinematic and EMG analysis of backward walking on treadmill. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No. 00CH37143). 2000;2:825-27. [crossref]
11.
Flynn TW, Soutas-Little RW. Patellofemoral joint compressive forces during forward and rearward running. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;21(5):277-82. [crossref]
12.
Uthoff A, Oliver J, Cronin J, Harrison C, Winwood P. A new direction to athletic performance: Understanding the acute and longitudinal responses to backward running. Sports Med. 2018;48(5):1083-96. [crossref]
13.
Masumoto K, Takasugi S, Hotta N, Fujishima K, Iwamoto Y. Muscle activity and heart rate response during backward walking in water and on dry land. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005;94(1-2):54-61. [crossref]
14.
Rudnicka E, Napierala P, Podfigurna A, Me? czekalski B, Smolarczyk R, Grymowicz M. The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing. Maturitas. 2020;139:06-11. [crossref]
15.
Sánchez Romero EA, Fernández Carnero J, Villafañe JH, Calvo-Lobo C, Ochoa Sáez V, Burgos Caballero V, et al. Prevalence of myofascial trigger points in patients with mild to moderate painful knee osteoarthritis: A secondary analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2561. [crossref]
16.
Nair T, Kumar GP. Correlation between severity of symptoms and quality of life in patellofemoral pain syndromes: A cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e49094. [crossref]
17.
Khasawneh RR, Allouh MZ, Abu-El-Rub E. Measurement of the quadriceps (Q) angle with respect to various body parameters in young Arab population. PloS One. 2019;14(6):e0218387. [crossref]
18.
Milanese S, Gordon S, Buettner P, Flavell C, Ruston S, Coe D, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of knee angle measurement: Smart phone app versus universal goniometer used by experienced and novice clinicians. Man Ther. 2014;19(6):569-74. [crossref]
19.
Gurudut P, Patel R, Mukkannavar P, Vira P. Effect of retro-walking on treadmill on hamstring flexibility, gait, kinesiophobia, and psychometry in individuals with chronic knee osteoarthritis. Indian J Physical Therapy and Res. 2019;1(2):93-99. [crossref]
20.
Mentiplay BF, Perraton LG, Bower KJ, Adair B, Pua YH, Williams GP, et al. Assessment of lower limb muscle strength and power using hand-held and fixed dynamometry: A reliability and validity study. PloS One. 2015;10(10):e0140822. [crossref]
21.
Hmamouchi I, Allali F, Tahiri L, Khazzani H, Mansouri LE, Ali Ou Alla S, et al. Clinically important improvement in the WOMAC and predictor factors for response to non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritic patients: A prospective study. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:58. [crossref]
22.
Alahmari KA, Kakaraparthi VN, Reddy RS, Silvian P, Tedla JS, Rengaramanujam K, et al. Combined effects of strengthening and proprioceptive training on stability, balance, and proprioception among subjects with chronic ankle instability in different age groups: Evaluation of clinical outcome measures. Indian J Orthop. 2021;55(Suppl 1):199-208. [crossref]
23.
Kuptniratsaikul V, Kittichaikarn C, Suntornpiyapan P, Kovintaset K, Inthibal S. Is four-week underwater treadmill exercise regimen compared to home exercise efficacious for pain relief and functional improvement in obese patients with knee osteoarthritis? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(1):85-93. [crossref]
24.
Joshi S, Singh SK, Vij JS. Effect of retrowalking, a non-pharmacological treatment on pain, disability, balance and gait in knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10(2):214. [crossref]
25.
Chand D, Nuhmani S, John S. Comparison of the effects of retro walking and stretching on balance and flexibility. Sports Medicine Journal/Medicina Sportivâ. 2013;9(4):2251-57.
26.
Whitley CR, Dufek JS. Effects of backward walking on hamstring flexibility and low back range of motion. Int J Exerc Sci. 2011;4(3):192-198. [crossref]
27.
Baby E, Thachil A. Effectiveness of retro walking in women with osteoarthritis of knee. International J Health Sciences and Res. 2022;12(3):326-45. [crossref]
28.
Fitzgerald GK, Fritz JM, Childs JD, Brennan GP, Talisa V, Gil AB, et al. Exercise, manual therapy, and use of booster sessions in physical therapy for knee osteoarthritis: A multi-center, factorial randomized clinical trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016;24(8):1340-49. [crossref]
29.
Plotkin DL, Roberts MD, Haun CT, Schoenfeld BJ. Muscle fiber type transitions with exercise training: Shifting perspectives. Sports (Basel). 2021;9(9):127. [crossref]
30.
Suetta C, Magnusson SP, Rosted A, Aagaard P, Jakobsen AK, Larsen LH, et al. Resistance training in the early postoperative phase reduces hospitalization and leads to muscle hypertrophy in elderly hip surgery patients-A controlled, randomized study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(12):2016-22. [crossref]
31.
Korkmaz C, Toy AB. The effect of retro walking training on dynamic balance in sedentary individuals with hearing impairment. Int J Education and Literacy Studies. 2023;11(1):164-69. [crossref]
32.
Diracoglu D, Baskent A, Celik A, Issever H, Aydin R. Long-term effects of kinesthesia/balance and strengthening exercises on patients with knee osteoarthritis: A one-year follow-up study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2008;21(4):253-62.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/71100.19709

Date of Submission: Apr 05, 2024
Date of Peer Review: May 01, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 17, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 05, 2024
• Manual Googling: May 08, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 15, 2024 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com