Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 162082

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : QD01 - QD04 Full Version

Navigating Postcaesarean Challenges: A Case Report on Bladder Flap Haematoma with Haematuria


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/72477.19713
Khushboo Singh, Vaishali Korde Nayak, Priyanka Prashant Kamdar, Jaya Barla

1. Senior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MIMER Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MIMER Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Junior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MIMER Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MIMER Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Jaya Barla,
Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, MIMER Medical College, Yashwant Nagar, Talegaon Dabhade, Pune-410507, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: barlajaya@gmail.com

Abstract

A less common puerperal complication following a caesarean section is a bladder flap haematoma, characterised by the accumulation of blood in the vesico-uterine space. A young, unregistered primigravida was referred from a peripheral facility with preeclampsia and obstructed labour. Signs of obstructed labour were observed both before and intraoperatively, like dehydration, foetal distress, a stretched lower uterine segment, and oedematous bladder. The uterus was sutured in two layers to control bleeding, and the patient was closely monitored postoperatively. The diagnosis of haematoma was made by the increasing height of the uterus and a suprapubic bulge anterior to the uterus, along with postoperative haematuria. Imaging with ultrasonography and Computed Tomography (CT) helped to decide the management. The patient improved after exploratory laparotomy with haematoma drainage. No bladder injury was found during the cystoscopy. Early diagnosis and treatment were important in preventing complications such as haemodynamic instability, abscess formation, and sepsis. Authors present their experience in this patient with postcaesarean vesico-uterine haematoma, with frank haematuria, without an obvious bladder injury, who required re-exploration. The clinical presentation, course, and sonographic findings of this patient form the basis of this report.

Keywords

Cystoscopy, Exploratory laparotomy, Sepsis, Vesico-uterine space

Case Report

A 28-year-old primigravida at 39 weeks four days with preeclampsia and obstructed labour was referred from a primary healthcare centre at midnight. She showed signs of distress like tachycardia, high blood pressure (150/100 mmHg), fever (99°F), and dehydration. Moderate uterine contractions with stretching of the lower uterine segment were noted, along with foetal bradycardia. On Per Vaginum (PV) examination, the cervix was oedematous, and grade 2 caput and moulding were present at 0 station. After catheterising the bladder and draining 100 cc of concentrated urine, an emergency caesarean section was performed under spinal anaesthesia. A 3.5 kg male baby was delivered, requiring neonatal resuscitation. During the procedure, an oedematous bladder and uterovesical fold of peritoneum were observed. The uterovesical peritoneal fold was incised to separate the bladder. There was a major bleeding vessel in the upper flap of the uterine incision on the left-side, which was separately secured. The uterus was closed in double layers, the first interlocking continuously, and in the second layer, the visceral peritoneum was also approximated. After confirming the mop counts, the abdomen was closed. About 1000 cc of blood loss was noted, along with haematuria in the urobag, which was likely due to obstructed labour.

After surgery, the patient was closely monitored. After two hours, a suprapubic bulge was noticed, and the uterine size increased to 26 weeks gestation (Table/Fig 1). The uterus was retracted well. Bleeding was average. The patient had tachycardia (100-110 per minute) and blood pressure of 130/100 mmHg. Bladder drainage was good with an hourly urine output of 40-50 mL, but the urine was haemorrhagic (Table/Fig 2). The patient was provisionally diagnosed with a postcaesarean haematoma and was transfused one packed red cell and two units of Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP). Conservative management was chosen due to no apparent increase in the haematoma size or vaginal bleeding in the following four hours. The patient’s coagulation profile was normal. She received broad-spectrum antibiotics and antihypertensives. Surgeons’ intervention was sought due to persistent haematuria, recommending bladder irrigation with three litres of normal saline through a three-way Foley catheter.

Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound was performed with a distended bladder (Foley catheter clamped temporarily), revealing a 100 cc collection between the anterior uterine wall and the bladder (Table/Fig 3). The incision’s acoustic shadow was visible in the lower uterine segment, and the bladder had intact margins with no hydronephrosis or free fluid elsewhere. Given the patient’s stable condition, conservative management was continued.

On the second day after the operation, the patient experienced a sudden episode of heavy vaginal bleeding, approximately 200 cc. During a PV examination, a tense bulge was detected in the anterior vaginal wall. Computed Tomography with Intravenous Pyelogram (CT-IVP) was done (Table/Fig 4). It showed arterial stage dye in haematoma suggesting an arterial feeder. Haematoma size had increased to approximately 350 cc and there was an absence of dye entry in the right ureter. Ultrasonography was also repeated which showed an increase in the collection in the vesico-uterine fold (Table/Fig 5), along with fluid in the Morrison’s pouch (Table/Fig 6) and paracolic gutters (Table/Fig 7).

A decision was taken to perform exploratory laparotomy with cystoscopy. During cystoscopy, the posterior bladder wall appeared oedematous with a few oozing capillaries, but no bladder injury was found (Table/Fig 8). During laparotomy, a large haematoma in the uterovesical plane extending to the broad ligaments and retroperitoneum was identified (Table/Fig 9). The haematoma was drained, and a bleeder near the left uterine angle was secured. The bladder was distended with methylene blue without any leaks, indicating no obvious injury. Right ureteric Double-J (DJ) stenting was performed due to kinking and tortuosity in the right ureter. The patient received two units of packed cells intraoperatively.

Postoperatively, the patient remained stable, and urine cleared on the second day after the laparotomy. A drain was placed and removed on the sixth day. The uterus began to involute, and the patient’s condition improved. The Foley catheter was removed on the 15th postoperative day, and the patient could urinate without difficulty during follow-up visits. The patient’s consent has been taken for publishing the clinical material for educational purpose.

Discussion

With the rise in caesarean section rate throughout the world, one needs to be aware of the many complications associated with it (1). Traditionally, a lower uterine segment transverse incision (Kerr’s incision) is taken after separating the uterovesical fold of peritoneum and pushing the bladder inferiorly (2). If there is bleeding in this space, it may lead to haematoma formation between the bladder and the lower uterine segment. Vesico-uterine haematoma, also known as bladder flap haematoma, is a rare complication associated with the traditional method of closure of the uterovesical fold of peritoneum (3). Radiological imaging can be used to diagnose and monitor the size of the haematoma and therefore help in decision-making regarding haematoma drainage or conservative management (4).

Bladder flap haematoma is a rare complication of caesarean section when the uterovesical fold of peritoneum is closed, and a haematoma is formed in this layer. Studies have compared the formation and non formation of the bladder flap during caesarean section and have found short-term benefits in the latter (3),(5),(6). However, in this case, as caesarean section was done for obstructed labour, it was necessary to create the bladder flap to prevent injury to the oedematous bladder. Malvasi A et al., have found that closure of the visceral peritoneum during caesarean section is associated with increased chances of haematomas (6). They also suggested that in caesarean section done for labour dystocia, closure of the uterovesical fold should be avoided (6). Many studies have advocated for non formation of the bladder fold of peritoneum during caesarean section and mass closure (3),(7).

In the present case, the provisional diagnosis of a bladder flap haematoma was based on routine postoperative monitoring of the fundal height, which showed an increase, and the appearance of a suprapubic bulge. These clinical findings were subsequently confirmed through ultrasonography. Usually, bladder flap haematomas are identified on ultrasonography (8). In the present case, authors also did a CT-IVP for this patient, as she had persistent haematuria. Studies have shown that CT was a better modality, especially to look for any bleeder in cases of haematoma (4),(9).

Bladder flap haematomas can manifest in various ways, such as postpartum haemorrhage, abdominal distension, fever, and less commonly, haematuria, as observed in this case and reported by Ilhan G et al., (10). The likely reason for the absence of contrast in the right ureter could be attributed to either ureteral spasm or kinking caused by the expanding retroperitoneal haematoma in the present case. Gross hydronephrosis has been reported following bladder flap haematoma (11).

There are no clear guidelines for the management of bladder flap haematoma. Usually, haematomas <5 cm and haemodynamically stable patients are managed conservatively with antibiotics (10). However, if the patient’s condition deteriorates, relaparotomy is indicated and may lead to hysterectomy as well (11),(12). The role of laparoscopy has also been considered in the management of bladder flap haematomas (13). Routine closure of both visceral and parietal peritoneum is not advocated (5). Malvasi A et al., have questioned the need for creating the bladder flap at the time of caesarean section and suggested a mass closure method of suturing the uterine incision (7).

Conclusion

Healthcare providers should be aware of bladder flap haematoma as a potential complication of caesarean sections. Effective management of this complication often necessitates a collaborative effort among obstetricians, radiologists, urologists, and anaesthesiologists. With prompt and proper care, many bladder flap haematomas can be resolved without lasting issues. However, whether managed conservatively or surgically, bladder flap haematomas can increase patient morbidity, emphasising the need for standardised management protocols supported by additional research.

Acknowledgement

Dr. DV Gopalghare, Professor, Obstetrics and Gynaecology for his constant support. Dr. Prashant Gangurde and Dr. SS Thind, Radiologists who helped us reach a decision by reporting accurate radiological findings.

References

1.
Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349-57. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Hiramatsu Y. Lower-segment transverse cesarean section. Surg J (N Y). 2020;6(Suppl 02):S72-80. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Akhlaghi F, Khazaie A, Jafaripour F. Comparing formation or non-formation of bladder flap at cesarean section on perioperative and postoperative complications: Double-blind clinical trial. J Family Reprod Health. 2017;11(3):152-58.
4.
Laifer-Narin SL, Kwak E, Kim H, Hecht EM, Newhouse JH. Multimodality imaging of the postpartum or posttermination uterus: Evaluation using ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2014;43(6):374-85. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: Short- and long-term outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(8):CD000163. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Guido M, Zizza A, Farine D, Stark M. Should the visceral peritoneum at the bladder flap closed at cesarean sections? A post-partum sonographic and clinical assessment. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(7):662-69. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Gustapane S, Mazzone E, Cavallotti C, Stark M, et al. Surgical technique to avoid bladder flap formation during cesarean section. G Chir. 2011;32(11-12):498-503.
8.
Baker ME, Bowie JD, Killam AP. Sonography of post-cesarean-section bladder-flap hematoma. Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144(4):757-59. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Gui B, Danza FM, Valentini AL, Laino ME, Caruso A, Carducci B, et al. Multidetector CT appearance of the pelvis after cesarean delivery: Normal and abnormal acute findings. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016;22(6):534-41. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
İlhan G, Atmaca FFV, Zebitay AG, Gültekin H, Ergin AH, Ohanog? lu K. A case of bladder flap hematoma presenting with hematuria. IJWHR. 2016;4(4):205-07. [crossref]
11.
Thanasa E, Thanasa A, Kamaretsos E, Paraoulakis I, Grapsidi V, Gerokostas EE, et al. Large bladder flap haematoma following a caesarean section associated with right hydroureteronephrosis: A case report and a mini review of the literature. Med Int (Lond). 2023;3(5):01-05.[crossref][PubMed]
12.
Kurniadi A, Prasetyawati RDD, Prasekti H. Post-supravaginal hysterectomy for bladder flap hematoma in P3A0 preterm delivery by cesarean section due to fetal distress. Indonesian J Cancer. 2022;16(3):184-88. [crossref]
13.
Tinelli A, Malvasi A, Tinelli R, Cavallotti C, Tinelli FG. Conservative laparoscopic treatment of post-caesarean section bladder flap haematoma: Two case reports. Gynecol Sur. 2007;4:53-56.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/72477.19713

Date of Submission: Apr 26, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jun 05, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 10, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 27, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jun 06, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 08, 2024 (6%))

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 5

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com