Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 207524

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : TC01 - TC05 Full Version

Foetal Pulmonary Artery Derived Doppler Parameters for Foetal Lung Maturity Assessment: An Observational Study


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/70374.19711
Namdev Seth, Saumya Verma

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, AIIMS, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, BRD Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Namdev Seth,
408, Imperial Crest Apartment, Jhungia, Gorakhpur-273013, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: namdevseth@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) is a major cause of foetal mortality and morbidity, especially in preterm labour because of concerns about foetal lung maturity. One of the method to assess foetal lung maturity is the Doppler assessment of the foetal Pulmonary Artery.

Aim: To assess the accuracy of Doppler findings of the foetal Main Pulmonary Artery (MPA) in foetal lung maturity assessment and prediction of the development of neonatal RDS in preterm deliveries.

Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Radiology, along with the Departments of Obstetrics and the Department of Paediatrics of Rama Medical College, Hospital, and Research Institute in Kanpur, India from May 2022 to December 2022. A total of 76 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and gestational age <37 weeks were included. Clinical history and relevant clinical examination data were collected from the patients. Ultrasound examination began with a general survey of the gestational sac, foetal biometry, detailed anatomical evaluation for any evident anomalies, and then cardiac evaluation. The Doppler waveform of the MPA was confirmed by its characteristic ‘spike and dome pattern’. It was distinguished from the ductus arteriosus waveform, as it shows a triangular waveform with increased diastolic flow. Acceleration Time (AT) was measured from the start of the systolic wave to the first systolic peak. Ejection Time (ET) measurement included the entire systolic wave. The diagnosis of RDS was made by the paediatrician, who was blinded to the Doppler findings. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software to assess the diagnostic ability of the Doppler findings and to find the cut-off values with maximum sensitivity and specificity.

Results: Out of the 76 pregnant women included in this study, 14 were excluded due to inadequate Doppler measurements and not being able to give birth within one week of Doppler evaluation. The study assessed a total of 62 pregnant females who underwent preterm delivery following the Doppler study. In total, 28 neonates developed RDS. Doppler parameters of both groups were compared (the first group included pregnant women whose neonates developed RDS after birth, and the second group included pregnant women whose neonates didn’t develop RDS after birth) with the help of the ROC curve. The AT/ET ratio achieved the highest sensitivity and specificity, both at 82%.

Conclusion: The AT/ET ratio has produced the best results among all foetal pulmonary artery-derived Doppler parameters and is a promising non invasive method for assessing foetal lung maturity.

Keywords

Acceleration time, Ejection time, Neonatology, Ultrasonography

Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS) in neonates, also called hyaline membrane disease, is a relatively common cause of morbidity and mortality in newborn babies, specifically in preterm deliveries (1). It occurs because of the deficient secretion of surfactant in the pulmonary alveoli by type 2 pneumocytes. The main function of surfactant is to reduce alveolar surface tension, hence, preventing alveolar collapse during expiration. Surfactant deficiency leads to inadequate functional transition of the lungs from foetal to neonatal life (1). RDS remains a common cause of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission in preterm-born neonates and continues to be associated with significant mortality and morbidity, despite significant advances in perinatal care (2). Hence, assessment of foetal lung maturity is extremely important in obstetrical management. Traditionally, mainstay methods of foetal lung maturity assessment include lecithin sphingomyelin ratio, phosphatidylglycerol test, and foam stability test, among others. However, these tests are invasive, requiring amniocentesis, and have only moderate specificity (3),(4). Traditional non invasive methods of foetal lung maturity assessment include gestational age estimation, age of epiphyseal centers appearance, placental grading, comparison of foetal lung/liver echogenicity, and foetal weight estimation; however, these methods have proven to be less useful in clinical practice (5),(6).

Foetal lung maturity assessment holds great importance in clinical practice as it contributes significantly to mortality and morbidity in preterm deliveries (2). Determination of foetal lung maturity status is one of the most challenging tasks for a radiologist as well as for an obstetricians because there is still no validated optimal strategy developed for it. Conventional methods such as the foam stability test, L/S ratio, fluorescence polarisation test, phosphatidylglycerol test, and lamellar body count test are invasive in nature and have not been able to prove the superiority of one another in controlled studies (6).

So, non invasive, novel methods are needed for determining foetal lung maturity. Foetal pulmonary artery pressure can be indirectly evaluated by Doppler indices measurement, which can be used to predict neonatal RDS occurrence as inadequate surfactant raises pulmonary impedance, leading to high pulmonary arterial pressure (7). Raised foetal pulmonary arterial pressure has been shown to correlate with gestational age, foetal lung maturity, and neonatal outcomes (7),(8). Limited studies have been performed on this concept (7),(8),(9). Thus, investigating the relationship between foetal pulmonary artery doppler indices and neonatal outcomes has been considered. The current study aimed to assess the accuracy of doppler findings of foetal MPA in foetal lung maturity assessment and prediction of the development of neonatal RDS in preterm deliveries.

Material and Methods

A prospective observational study included a total of 76 pregnant women during a period from May 2022 to December 2022 in the Department of Radiology, along with the Departments of Obstetrics and Paediatrics at Rama Medical College, Hospital, and Research Institute in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. Approval from the university Research Ethics Committee was obtained (certificate number RMCHRC/Ethics/2022/1990-A). All mothers included in this research were above 18 years old and gave written informed consent.

Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women, irrespective of parity, with singleton pregnancies and gestational age <37 weeks, who delivered within one week of the ultrasound scan were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Pre-existing maternal medical conditions like diabetes, renal diseases, cardiac diseases, and hypertensive disorders, among others. Major foetal anomalies identified during the scan or after delivery, chromosomal anomalies, intrauterine foetal growth restriction were all excluded from the study.

Sample size estimation: The Cochrane formula was used for sample size determination.

n=Z2p(1-p)/e2

Where,

‘Z’ is called the z-score.
‘p’ is the expected percentage of the population with the desired attribute.
‘e’ is the desired precision or margin of error.

The z-score was taken as 1.96, the p-value as 0.5, and the e-value as 0.13.

Before proceeding to the ultrasound examination, clinical history and relevant clinical examination data were collected from the patient. All ultrasound tests were performed by two radiologists, using a Samsung V7 ultrasound machine using a 3.5 MHz transabdominal probe.

The ultrasound examination started with a general survey of the gestational sac, biometry of the foetus, detailed anatomical evaluation of the foetus for any evident anomaly, and then the cardiac evaluation. All cardiac views were properly assessed, and then the pulmonary artery was focused on in axial sections, showing the pulmonary valve, MPA and its bifurcation into the right and left divisions (Table/Fig 1). The angle of insonation was kept below 30°, and the doppler sample gate was kept at 3 mm. Doppler gain and scale were adjusted such that the Peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) and early diastolic notch were clearly visualised. The Doppler waveform of the MPA was confirmed by its characteristic ‘spike and dome pattern’ and was distinguished from the ductus arteriosus wave, which later showed a triangular waveform with increased diastolic flow (Table/Fig 2). Acceleration Time (AT) was measured from starting of the systolic wave to the first systolic peak. Ejection Time (ET) measurement included the entirety of the systolic wave (Table/Fig 3).

The diagnosis of RDS was made by the paediatrician, who was blinded to the Doppler findings, by: 1) clinical history; 2) Not maintain oxygen saturation/increased oxygen requirement; 3) Low lung volume/reticulogranular pattern/whiteout on chest X-ray.

The cases were divided into two groups-those who developed RDS and those who did not develop RDS. The clinical, demographic, and doppler characteristics of these two groups were compared.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done using SPSS for Windows version 11.0. A two-tailed Independent sample t-test and Student’s t-test was used. ROC curves were drawn, using SPSS software to assess the diagnostic ability of doppler findings and to find the cut-off values with maximum sensitivity and specificity. A significance level of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Out of the 76 pregnant women included in this study, 14 were excluded due to inadequate Doppler measurements and not being able to give birth within one week of Doppler evaluation. The mean maternal age of the study population was 25.0±3.6 years, and the mean gestational age was 33.52±1.56 (30-36 weeks).

Data from a total of 62 pregnant females who underwent preterm delivery (before the 37th week of pregnancy) following the doppler study were analysed in this study. Cases were divided into two groups: a) neonates with RDS (n=28); and b) neonates without RDS (n=34). A significant difference was found in the mean birth weight of the two groups (2043 g in RDS positives and 2212 g in the RDS negative group, with p-value=0.0001) (Table/Fig 4).

Among doppler parameters, a statistically significant difference was found in the mean values of AT, ET ratio of AT/ET, PSV, Mean Velocity (MV), and Resistive Index (RI) (Table/Fig 5).

To compare the diagnostic abilities of different parameters, ROC curves were drawn. The highest Area Under Curve (AUC) was found for the AT/ET ratio (0.875), followed by the absolute AT value (0.833) (Table/Fig 6). The highest sensitivity and specificity of 82% each were achieved with the AT/ET ratio at a cut-off value of 0.29. For AT alone, the sensitivity and specificity were 76% and 72%, respectively, at a cut-off value of 48.5 (Table/Fig 7).

ROC was also drawn for PSV, End Diastolic Velocity (EDV) and MV (Table/Fig 8) as well as for Pulsatility Index (PI) and RI (Table/Fig 9).

Discussion

RDS is one of the leading causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity. The incidence of RDS increases with decreasing gestational age, with the maximum risk in very preterm (28- <32 weeks) and extremely preterm births (<28 weeks). It can also be seen in late preterm and early-term deliveries (10). Hence, the determination of foetal lung maturity is gaining importance in obstetrical management, particularly in elective caesarean cases planned because of obstetrical or medical indications (10). A clue to the doppler application in pulmonary circulation came by the study of Kitabatake A et al., which showed that the time to peak flow and Right Ventricular Ejection Time (RVET) were both decreased in patients with pulmonary hypertension, thus it may be helpful in the indirect evaluation of pulmonary artery pressure (11). Subsequently, Rasanen J et al., showed that pulmonary vasculature impedance decreases throughout gestation, which may be because of increased vessel wall elasticity, angiogenesis, and decreased pulmonary pressure related to growing lung tissue (12).

Furthermore, Fuke S et al., showed a lower pulmonary arterial AT/ET ratio in cases of pulmonary hypoplasia (13). Similarly, two separate studies were done by Kim SM et al., and Azpurua H et al., showed the increasing probability of lung maturity with a decreasing pulmonary arterial AT/ET ratio (14),(15). Kim SM et al., in their study, showed that the Pulmonary artery AT/ET ratio was significantly greater in foetuses that developed RDS after birth, compared with those who did not develop RDS. The AT/ET ratio in the group that developed RDS was 0.37 with a range of 0.26 to 0.41, whereas in the group that did not develop RDS, it was 0.30 with a range of 0.21 to 0.44. Their data showed that foetal pulmonary artery doppler velocimetry may provide a reliable non invasive technique to assess foetal lung maturity (14). Similarly, Azpurua H et al., studied the correlation between AT/ET ratio in the foetal pulmonary artery and amniotic fluid L/S ratio, and found an inverse relation between them. They showed that the AT/ET ratio of the foetal pulmonary artery was in a decreasing trend with increasing gestational age, and attributed this finding to a progressive decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance and an increase in pulmonary blood flow with increasing gestational age (15).

Hassan HGEMA et al., also conducted a similar study and showed that the mean AT/ET ratio of the foetal pulmonary artery was significantly lower in foetuses that subsequently developed RDS compared to those who did not throughout all gestational age periods (0.297 vs 0.352, p-value <0.001) and in the early preterm period (0.280 vs 0.312, p-value=0.002), late preterm period (0.311 vs 0.362, p-value <0.001), and early term period (0.345 vs 0.383, p-value <0.001). The optimal cut-off value of the AT/ET ratio in their study was 0.305 with sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 76.9%, 84.1%, 74%, and 86%, respectively (16).

Taha HMG et al., found the sensitivity and specificity of the foetal pulmonary artery as 76.6% and 100% at a cut-off value of 0.25 (17). This value was a relatively smaller compared to the studies performed by Keshuraj V et al., Hassan HGEMA et al., and Schenone MH et al., (9),(16),(18). All these data have been summarised in (Table/Fig 10) (9),(16),(17),(18).

In current study, an inverse association was found between foetal pulmonary AT/ET ratio and the diagnosis of RDS in the neonatal period. Hence, using the AT/ET ratio, instead of AT alone, produces better screening results. We look forward to similar studies on a large scale to validate the results and establish foetal pulmonary artery doppler as a screening tool to predict the occurrence of neonatal RDS.

Limitation(s)

The limitation of this study was the relatively small study population and single-centre nature of the study.

Conclusion

Among all the foetal pulmonary artery-derived doppler indices, the AT/ET ratio can prove to be a game-changer in obstetrical management of preterm and high-risk deliveries. Present study shows the significant screening ability of the AT/ET ratio in predicting the development of neonatal RDS.

References

1.
Ainsworth SB, Milligan DW. Surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in premature neonates: A comparative review. Am J Respir Med. 2002;1(6):417-33. Doi: 10.1007/BF03257169. [crossref]
2.
Wen SW, Smith G, Yang Q, Walker M. Epidemiology of preterm birth and neonatal outcome. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;9(6):429-35. Doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2004.04.002. [crossref]
3.
Spong CY, Mercer BM, D’Alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2 Pt 1):323-33. Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182255999. PMID: 21775849; PMCID: PMC3160133. [crossref]
4.
Ventolini G, Neiger R, Hood D, Belcastro C. Update on assessment of fetal lung maturity. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;25(6):535-38. Doi: 10.1080/01443610500227946. PMID: 16234135. [crossref]
5.
Tabsh KM. Correlation of ultrasonic epiphyseal centers and the lecithin: Sphingomyelin ratio. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64(1):92-96.
6.
Harman CR, Manning FA, Stearns E, Morrison I. The correlation of ultrasonic placental grading and fetal pulmonary maturation in five hundred sixty-three pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;143(8):941-43. Doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90478-1. [crossref]
7.
Guan Y, Li S, Luo G, Wang C, Norwitz ER, Fu Q, et al. The role of doppler waveforms in the fetal main pulmonary artery in the prediction of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Ultrasound. 2015;43(6):375-83. Doi: 10.1002/jcu.22219. Epub 2014 Aug 11. [crossref]
8.
Moety GA, Gaafar HM, El Rifai NM. Can fetal pulmonary artery doppler indices predict neonatal respiratory distress syndrome? J Perinatol. 2015;35(12):1015-19. Doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.128. Epub 2015 Oct 22. [crossref]
9.
Keshuraj V, Prakash A, Boruah DK, Ramanna HC, Sowmyashree AR, Mithun SK. Validity of foetal doppler indices in predicting postnatal respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective study. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2022;53:183. [crossref]
10.
Ghafoor T, Mahmud S, Ali S, Dogar SA. Incidence of respiratory distress syndrome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003;13(5):271-73.
11.
Kitabatake A, Inoue M, Asao M, Masuyama T, Tanouchi J, Morita T, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary hypertension by a pulsed doppler technique. Circulation. 1983;68(2):302-09. Doi: 10.1161/01.cir.68.2.302. [crossref]
12.
Rasanen J, Wood DC, Weiner S, Ludomirski A, Huhta JC. Role of the pulmonary circulation in the distribution of human fetal cardiac output during the second half of pregnancy. Circulation. 1996;94(5):1068-73. Doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.1068. [crossref]
13.
Fuke S, Kanzaki T, Mu J, Wasada K, Takemura M, Mitsuda N, et al. Antenatal prediction of pulmonary hypoplasia by acceleration time/ejection time ratio of fetal pulmonary arteries by doppler blood flow velocimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):228-33. Doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.69. [crossref]
14.
Kim SM, Park JS, Norwitz ER, Hwang EJ, Kang HS, Park CW, et al. Acceleration time-to-ejection time ratio in fetal pulmonary artery predicts the development of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: A prospective cohort study. Am J Perinatol. 2013;30(10):805-12. Doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333132. Epub 2013 Jan 4. [crossref]
15.
Azpurua H, Norwitz ER, Campbell KH, Funai EF, Pettker CM, Kleine M, et al. Acceleration/ejection time ratio in the fetal pulmonary artery predicts fetal lung maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(1):40.e1-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.075. Epub 2010 Apr 24. [crossref]
16.
Hassan HGEMA, Nagi MAMA, Salama AMM, Dawoud MOAEA, Elgendy GG, Abdelrahman AS. Sonographic prediction of fetal main pulmonary artery (MPA) Doppler indices of lung maturity and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) development. J Ultrasound. 2023;26(2):525-33. Doi: 10.1007/s40477-023-00780-w. Epub 2023 Apr 20.[crossref]
17.
Taha HMG, Al Ghorab NM, Al-Namory MM, Hussein NA. Role of fetal pulmonary artery doppler in prediction of neonatal respiratory distress in neonates of diabetic mothers. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2022;11(12):3236- 41. Available from: www.ijrcog.org. [crossref]
18.
Schenone MH, Samson JE, Jenkins L, Suhag A, Mari G. Predicting fetal lung maturity using the fetal pulmonary artery doppler wave acceleration/ejection time ratio. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(3):208-14. Doi: 10.1159/000358299.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/70374.19711

Date of Submission: Feb 27, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Apr 01, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 05, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 27, 2024
• Manual Googling: Apr 08, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 04 2024 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com