Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 228087

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : UD04 - UD06 Full Version

Anaesthetic Challenges in Paediatric Hepatoblastoma Resection: A Case Report


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/70916.19723
Fateh Pal Singh Gill, Chhaya M Suryawanshi, Smita Ubhe, Deepali Patil, Vipul Krishen Sharma

1. Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 4. Consultant, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 5. Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Chhaya M Suryawanshi,
Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, Pimpri, Pune-411018, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: chhayasuryawanshi@gmail.com

Abstract

The most common primary liver tumour in children is hepatoblastoma, which is often diagnosed in the first three years of life. While the majority of hepatoblastomas are sporadic, some associations are reported with genetic disorders like Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis. The annual incidence of hepatoblastoma in children has gradually increased during the past three decades. Babies born prematurely, weighing <1 kg, have been found to be significantly more likely to acquire hepatoblastoma. The most common symptoms with which children present are abdominal discomfort, easy fatigability, loss of appetite, and anaemia. The choice of treatment is surgical resection of the mass or surgical resection coupled with chemotherapy. Present case is of a seven-month-old, 7 kg infant who presented with a gradually increasing abdominal mass diagnosed as hepatoblastoma. Left hepatectomy was done under general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia. Liver resection is one of the major surgical procedures that carries a risk of blood loss and pulmonary embolism, but improved expertise in paediatric anaesthesia and surgical skills have reduced operative risk. The challenges in this case were securing vascular access, maintaining blood volume with considerable fluid and blood loss, and assuring haemodynamic stability. Maintenance of normothermia, glucose levels, and effective pain management were all crucial, necessitating careful planning and a multidisciplinary approach to maximise results and guarantee patient safety.

Keywords

Anaesthesia, Epidural analgesia, Hepatectomy

Case Report

A seven-month-old male infant, weighing 7.2 kg and with a height of 67.2 cm, born at term, presented with a complaint of progressively increasing upper abdominal swelling over the past month. On examination, the infant was alert and active. General physical examination revealed pallor but no other physical or airway abnormalities. Abdominal examination suggested a palpable mass in the epigastrium and right hypochondrium, 8 cm below the right costal margin. Contrast enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) revealed a lobulated hypodense lesion measuring 74×64×75 mm involving almost the entire left lobe of the liver with heterogeneous enhancement on arterial, portal, and venous phases, as well as splenomegaly with enlargement to 7-9 cm (Table/Fig 1). The serum alpha-fetoprotein level was elevated to more than 20,000 ng/mL. The infant was scheduled for a left hepatectomy. Preoperative assessment revealed anaemia (Hb 6.3 gm/dL). After receiving a preoperative transfusion of 10 mL/kg of Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC) in two aliquots over 72 hours, the Hb level increased to 10.3 gm/dL. Airway, systemic examination, and other parameters, including liver function tests, coagulation profile, and blood sugar levels, were within normal limits. Preoperative Echocardiography was normal. The infant was classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3 with high-risk for left hepatectomy.

After a complete work-up, the parents were counseled in detail, explained about the rarity of the condition, the extent of the tumour, and the need for hepatectomy. Informed consent was obtained for the supra major surgical procedure, intraoperative haemodynamic compromise, and massive blood loss. In the operating theatre, all standard monitors were attached, and general anaesthesia was induced with the inhalational agent sevoflurane at 2-2.5 vol% plus oxygen in a 60:40 ratio with air. A peripheral line with a 22 G intravenous cannula was secured on the left hand. Injections of glycopyrrolate 4 μg/kg i.v., midazolam 0.01 mg/kg i.v., and fentanyl 2 μg/kg i.v. were administered, and endotracheal intubation was performed using a size 4 mm internal diameter uncuffed endotracheal tube after administering injection atracurium 3.5 mg (0.5 mg/kg). Central venous access using a 5 Fr triple lumen central line via the right internal jugular vein was established, and central venous pressure monitoring was initiated. The right radial artery was cannulated with a 22 G arterial catheter, and invasive arterial pressure monitoring was started. The baseline arterial blood gas was normal. A 21-gauge epidural catheter was placed using a 19 G Tuohy’s needle in the caudal space and fixed at 7 cm from the skin, and an injection of Bupivacaine 0.25% 7 mL was administered (Table/Fig 2).

Balanced anaesthesia was maintained with O2, air, and sevoflurane, intermittent injection of atracurium, and a 0.125% injection of bupivacaine at a rate of 4 mL/hr for epidural infusion intraoperatively. Hypothermia was avoided by using a warming mattress and warm i.v. fluids. During the liver resection, a low Central Venous Pressure (CVP) was maintained by restricting i.v. fluids. Blood sugar levels, urine output, and blood loss were monitored. A total blood loss of 200 mL, urine output of 200 mL, and other fluid losses were replaced with crystalloids and 130 mL of PRBC. No major haemodynamic perturbations occurred intraoperatively. The resected part of the liver with a mass is shown in (Table/Fig 3). The patient was extubated on the table after the reversal of neuromuscular blockade using injection neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) and injection glycopyrrolate (0.008 mg/kg). Postoperatively, an epidural infusion was started with injection fentanyl at a rate of 4 μg/hour. There was an increase in liver enzymes and slight derangement of the coagulation profile (INR increased to 1.5) on postoperative day 1, which gradually normalised. The epidural catheter was removed after 72 hours upon confirmation of a normal coagulation profile and platelet count. The patient resumed oral feeds on postoperative day 4 and had an uneventful recovery.

Discussion

Liver tumours in children represent a relatively small percentage of all childhood malignancies. The most common types are hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (1). Hepatoblastoma typically affects Caucasian boys younger than two years old with low birth weight. It presents as an increasing abdominal mass, occasionally accompanied by anaemia, jaundice, and ascites. Liver function tests are usually normal (1). There is a known association with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis (2).

In the present case, there were several noteworthy difficulties. It was extremely challenging to secure vascular access in an infant with small, fragile veins to place a central venous catheter, necessary for drug administration and central venous pressure monitoring. Precise haemodynamic regulation required invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. Due to the potential for significant fluid and blood loss from liver resection, maintaining haemodynamic stability and managing blood volume were essential, requiring meticulous monitoring and replacement procedures. The infant’s vulnerability to hypothermia and hypoglycaemia made maintaining normothermia and steady glucose levels significantly more important. Effective pain management was also a priority, achieved by the placement of an epidural catheter. Similar anaesthetic management difficulties were found in other studies in the literature (3). Hussain SY et al., and Mogane PN and Motshabi-Chakane P have suggested that anaesthetic management for infantile hepatoblastoma involves several unique challenges, such as securing central venous and arterial access, intraoperative fluid management, managing massive blood loss, controlling postoperative pain, preventing hypothermia, and avoiding air embolism and post-resection liver failure (3),(4).

Preoperative investigations include complete blood counts, liver enzymes, serum electrolytes, and alpha-fetoprotein. Radiological investigations include ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and CT scans. Hepatic resection is performed under general anaesthesia with epidural analgesia. General anaesthesia can be induced with an injection of propofol if i.v. access is present or with inhalational agents like sevoflurane (1). Muscle relaxants such as cisatracurium, rocuronium, or atracurium are used. The effects of hepatic dysfunction on drug elimination and distribution are not fully understood (1).

Nitrous oxide should be avoided as it causes gut distension and increases the risk of air embolism (4). The large surface-to-volume ratio of infants, coupled with immature thermoregulatory mechanisms, exposure of body cavities to low environmental temperatures, and ventilation with dry gases, increases the potential for hypothermia. Therefore, preventing hypothermia is crucial (1). Blood glucose levels should be monitored frequently throughout the procedure (1). Epidural anaesthesia is essential for both intraoperative and postoperative pain control and also limits the use of volatile anaesthetics during surgery (1).

Factors predisposing to vascular air embolism during liver resection include surgical technique, size, and site of the tumour, blood loss, and low CVP techniques (3). Sophisticated equipment like the cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator is preferred for parenchymal resections in small infants. Perioperative fluid therapy involves the replacement of deficits and third-space losses along with maintenance. A low CVP strategy (less than 5 cm of H2O) is advocated to minimise hepatic bleeding (5). Care should be taken when intra-abdominal packs are placed while hepatic resection is underway as there may be i.v. compression resulting in compromised venous return and impaired cardiac output.

Conclusion

Hepatoblastoma warrants suspicion in children presenting with symptoms such as an abdominal mass, diminished appetite, general weakness, and elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels. Prior to surgery, a comprehensive assessment, optimisation, and collaborative approach across multiple teams are important to enhance patient outcomes. The anaesthetic management of hepatoblastoma cases undergoing hepatic resections presents complexities, necessitating meticulous planning for intravenous and arterial access, intraoperative fluid administration, and postoperative pain relief. Achieving a delicate equilibrium between organ-protective anaesthesia and stable haemodynamics is paramount for optimal postoperative results. Rigorous monitoring, precise blood transfusion, and recognition of the infant’s susceptibility to cardiac arrest, coupled with an understanding of surgical technique, are pivotal for successful outcomes in paediatric hepatic surgery.

References

1.
Williams RK, Lauro HV, Davies PJ. Anaesthesia for general abdominal and urologic surgery. In: Smith’s Anaesthesia for Infants and Children. 9th ed. Elsevier; 2018.
2.
Hiyama E. Paediatric hepatoblastoma: Diagnosis and treatment. Transl Paediatr. 2014;3(4):293-99. Doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-4336.2014.09.01.
3.
Hussain SY, Tandon U, Singh SK, Ganguly S. Perioperative anaesthetic management of paediatric hepatoblastoma for hepatic resection. J Marine Medical Society. 2015;17(1):74-77. [crossref]
4.
Mogane PN, Motshabi-Chakane P. Anaesthetic considerations for liver resections in paediatric patients. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2013;19(6):290-94. [crossref]
5.
Jacob R. Anaesthesia for biliary atresia and hepatectomy in paediatrics. Indian J Anaesth. 2012;56(5):479-84.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/70916.19723

Date of Submission: Apr 03, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Apr 19, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 20, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 03, 2024
• Manual Googling: Apr 22, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 19, 2024 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com