Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 32553

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : YC01 - YC04 Full Version

Effect of Mulligan Calcaneal Taping on Dynamic Balance and Functional Performance in Subjects with Plantar Fasciitis: A Prospective Cohort Study


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/71034.19707
Chetna Jakhotiya, Riddhi Ashish Shroff, Pranita Ganjave

1. Undergraduate Student, School of Physiotherapy, D.Y. Patil (Deemed to be University), Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, School of Physiotherapy, D.Y. Patil (Deemed to be University), Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. 3. Associate Professor, School of Physiotherapy, D.Y. Patil (Deemed to be University), Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Riddhi Ashish Shroff,
Associate Professor, School of Physiotherapy, D.Y. Patil (Deemed to be University), Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: riddhi.shroff@dypatil.edu

Abstract

Introduction: Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel and foot pain, leading individuals to use compensatory techniques to alleviate their pain, resulting in an antalgic gait. These compensations alter the feeling of joint position and muscle activation, making it challenging to maintain an upright posture within the base of support. According to Mulligan’s concept, rigid tape allows painful or restricted movements with quick pain relief and increased range of motion while correcting positional faults and reducing tensile tension on the fascia, thereby decreasing inflammation and microscopic tears. Currently, there is a scarcity of data studying the effect of Mulligan’s calcaneal taping on dynamic balance.

Aim: To evaluate the effect of Mulligan’s calcaneal taping on dynamic balance and functional performance in subjects with plantar fasciitis.

Materials and Methods: The study was a prospective cohort study conducted at D.Y. Patil Hospital and Research Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. It began in March 2023 and concluded in March 2024, spanning one year. Thirty-six subjects were randomly divided into group A (n=18) and group B (n=18). Subjects experiencing pain for more than six weeks, aged between 18-60 years, with a positive Windlass test, plantar medial heel pain, and abnormal foot posture index (between +6 to +9) were included in the study. The experimental group received Mulligan’s calcaneal taping along with conventional physiotherapy exercises, while the control group received only conventional physiotherapy exercises. Pre-post assessments were conducted using the star excursion balance test for dynamic balance assessment and the Foot Function Index (FFI) for functional performance.

Results: Statistically significant differences were found among the medial (p-value=0.0212), posteromedial (p-value=0.0199), and posterior (p-value=0.0091) directions of the star excursion balance test. Both groups did not show statistically significant differences in the FFI score. However, with effect size, there was good clinical significance for the FFI score and all directions of the star excursion balance test except the posterolateral direction.

Conclusion: Mulligan calcaneal taping has been shown to be more effective in improving dynamic balance in subjects with plantar fasciitis.

Keywords

Foot function, Heel, Inflammation, Pain

Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of heel and foot pain, caused by inflammation and degeneration of the plantar fascia, contributing to 15% of all foot pathologies (1). It is an overuse injury that mostly arises from microtears of the plantar fascia caused by repetitive strain, although it can also occur from trauma and other multifactorial causes (2). Hicks originally defined the foot and its ligaments as a triangular structure, or truss, resembling an arch (3). The tibia loads the foot “truss” and generates tension via the plantar fascia when bearing weight, known as the Windlass mechanism (4). Plantar fasciitis is primarily characterised by significant acute pain, primarily at the site where the plantar fascia attaches to the anterior calcaneus (5). Plantar fasciitis can be caused by several factors, such as excessive pronation of the foot, caused by adduction of the talus and plantar flexion during weight bearing, which causes the calcaneus to evert in 81-86% of cases (6). Plantar fasciitis is a foot disorder that causes discomfort in the plantar fascia, leading to balance issues (7), as studies have concluded that dynamic balance is affected in patients with plantar fasciitis when compared to healthy individuals (8). Literature has shown the use of different taping techniques as a management of plantar fasciitis, with rigid tape or athletic tape being one of them (1). According to Mulligan’s concept, while using rigid tape, painful and restricted movements can benefit from quick pain relief and increased range of motion while retaining positional fault correction (9). Mulligan’s calcaneal taping focuses on correcting faulty biomechanics of the rear foot (4). The height of the medial longitudinal arch increases with calcaneal taping, which can correct calcaneal eversion and bring it almost to neutral. As a result, the plantar fascia may experience less tensile tension, which lessens inflammation and microscopic tears (10).

The application of the tape ensures that the therapeutic glide is preserved, setting it apart from conventional taping techniques. Individuals experience pain and discomfort due to plantar fasciitis and adopt a compensatory gait pattern, leading them to walk with an antalgic gait (10),(11). This can affect individuals’ ability to carry out daily activities like household chores, work tasks, or any recreational activity, affecting functional performance. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of Mulligan’s calcaneal taping on dynamic balance and functional performance in subjects with plantar fasciitis.

Material and Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted at D.Y. Patil Hospital and Research Centre, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, study started in March 2023 and ended in March 2024 spanning one year. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) for Biomedical and Health Research at D.Y. Patil School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai (IEC ref. No: DYP/IECBH/2023/233). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects, and the procedure was properly explained.

Inclusion criteria: Both males and females experiencing pain for more than six weeks, aged between 18 and 60 years, with a positive Windlass test (11), along with plantar medial heel pain (11) and an abnormal Foot Posture Index (11) (ranging from +6 to +9), were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Participants with heel pain, except in medical aspects, who had received any medical or surgical treatment prior to or during the study period, used any assistive device for ambulation, had systematic inflammatory arthritis, cancer, active tuberculosis, psychological disturbances, or had undergone previous surgery on the lower limb in the last year, were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: The sample size was calculated using the formula

n=2S2 (Z1-α+Z1-β)2/d2,

where Z1-β=Z-value for β level (1.96 at 5% β error or 95% confidence) and Z1-β=Z-value for β level (1.2820 at 10% β error or 90% power). Here, d=Margin of error=1.02, S=Pooled SD=(S1+S2)/2. A total of 36 subjects were included, with 18 in each group. This sample size calculation was based on a pilot study conducted, and the SD values obtained were S1=0.97 and S2=0.96.

Study Procedure

The subjects were divided into two groups, group A and group B, using the simple random sampling method. In both groups, baseline measurements and postmeasurements were taken using the star excursion test for dynamic balance and the FFI for functional performance.

The subjects in ‘group A’ were given treatment with Mulligan’s calcaneal taping, as shown in (Table/Fig 1), and exercises. To apply the tape, at the beginning, one end of the tape was placed diagonally on the lateral surface of the affected calcaneum. The therapist then moved and held the calcaneum in external rotation and adduction with one hand while sustaining the glide, and at the end, the tape was pulled and wrapped around the ankle medially. The tape was removed after two days, and the patient was given an exercise program with the tape applied on the foot.

The subjects in ‘group B’ were treated only with exercises similar to group A, which included heel raises, toe raises, foot doming, toe spread out, plantar fascia stretching, tendo-Achillis stretching, with one set of 10 repetitions each. Both groups received two supervised sessions per week and a home exercise program for two weeks. Post-treatment measurements were taken for both groups after two weeks of treatment using the star excursion test for dynamic balance and the FFI for functional performance.

Star excursion test: The star excursion test was performed by drawing a star on the ground with masking tape. Eight directions were drawn, each 120 cm from the center. The subject used the right foot as the reaching foot and the left leg for balance, completing the circuit in a clockwise fashion (12). When balancing on the right leg, the subject performed the circuit in an anticlockwise fashion. With their hands firmly placed on their hips or shoulders, the subject was instructed to reach with one foot as far as possible, lightly touching the line before returning to the starting upright position. A spot was marked where the individual’s toe touched the line and measured from the center spot after the test to calculate the reach distance of each reach direction. After completing a full circuit with the affected foot, this process was repeated three times. The first reach was labeled as Reach 1, the second as Reach 2, and the third as Reach 3. The scoring was conducted as follows (12):

- Average distance in each direction (cm)=(Reach 1+Reach 2+ Reach 3)/3
- Relative (normalised) distance in each direction (%)=(Average distance in each direction/leg length)*100 (13).

Foot Function Index (FFI): The FFI was developed in 1991 to measure the impact of foot pathology on function in terms of pain, disability, and activity restriction (14). It is a self-administered index consisting of 23 items divided into three subscales. Both total and subscale scores are produced. The FFI questionnaire was explained to the subjects, and the scoring was based on the subject’s response to each question. It consists of three subscales which include pain, disability, and activity limitation. Each question is scored on a scale of 0-10 (0= no pain or difficulty, 10= worst imaginable pain or difficulty) (14).

Statistical Analysis

The data obtained from the participants were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 29.0. An Independent sample t-test was performed for intergroup comparison. Cohen’s d was calculated to estimate the standardised effect size. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. For clinical significance, the interpretation of effect size values are as follows: <0.2=trivial effect; 0.2-0.5=small effect; 0.5-0.8=moderate effect, and >0.8=large effect (15).

Results

The pretest and post-test intergroup comparison of balance measured by the star excursion balance test (Table/Fig 2) shows statistically significant improvement in the medial (p-value=0.0212), posteromedial (p-value=0.0199), and posterior (p-value=0.0091) directions. In effect size estimation, it indicates a large clinical significance (>0.8) in the medial (d=0.805), posteromedial (d 0.814), and Posterior (d=0.923) directions, except for the posterolateral direction (d=0.015). There is a moderate clinical significance (0.5-0.8) in the anterior direction (d=0.602) and small clinical significance (0.2-0.5) in the anteromedial (d=0.247), lateral (d=0.358), and anterolateral (d= 0.346) directions.

On the other hand, no statistically significant difference was observed for the pretest and post-test intergroup comparison of FFI scores with p-values of p=0.2665 and p=0.3348, respectively (Table/Fig 3). However, the calculated effect size for the FFI (d=0.816) showed a large clinical significance for the pre and post-test scores between group A and group B. The larger clinical significance implies that the change is clinically important.

Discussion

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of Mulligan calcaneal taping on dynamic balance and functional performance in subjects with plantar fasciitis compared to conventional physiotherapy. In the current study, subjects in both groups were given strengthening exercises for intrinsic foot muscles and stretching exercises for the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon. Only subjects in the experimental group received Mulligan calcaneal taping for two weeks. When studying the difference between group A and group B, a statistically significant improvement was observed in the medial direction (p-value=0.0212), posteromedial direction (p-value=0.0199), and posterior direction (p-value=0.0091). The lack of statistical significance in other directions may be attributed to the short two-week intervention duration. Previous studies have shown statistically significant differences in all directions except for the posteromedial direction (16). In this study, the posterolateral direction did not show any clinical or statistical significance. The reason for the lack of statistical improvement in the other directions may be that the change in distance with the swinging lower limb was small when applying the tape. Other factors besides balance or proprioception of the supporting limb (affected limb) may have influenced the test outcome. When considering the supporting limb, the resistance to quadriceps muscle fatigue may be one of the factors influencing the test result (16). Additionally, when considering the swinging lower limb, various other aspects reported in previous literature that could have been influential, such as the hip’s range of motion, the elasticity of the rectus, the quadriceps and psoas iliacus during posterior movements, or the abductor muscles during abduction, were not evaluated in present study (16). The improvement in dynamic balance could possibly be attributed to the reduction in pain after correcting positional faults. One of the causes of pain and discomfort in patients with plantar fasciitis is overpronation of the foot and flattening of the medial arch, which places excessive stress on the plantar fascia during weight-bearing activities (17),(18). Mulligan calcaneal taping supports the calcaneus, reducing a significant amount of stress and thereby reducing the compressive load on the plantar fascia. This leads to less irritation, reduced inflammation, better healing of microtears, and ultimately a reduction in pain, providing better stability (10). It is also associated with the decreased arch and rotational component of the calcaneus, which can be corrected with Mulligan’s calcaneal taping as it focuses on correcting faulty biomechanics of the rearfoot (19). By taping the calcaneus into external rotation and adduction, excessive pronation of the rearfoot can be prevented, maintaining a more neutral position. This reduces the force on the plantar fascia, and the glide is maintained due to the rigid tape (19).

The difference in the FFI between both groups did not show a statistically significant result. However, when the effect size was estimated, it showed a significant difference in Cohen’s d, which is considered to have large clinical significance (d=0.816). In this study, subjects with pronated feet in the FFI were included, which led to a significant reduction in the pain domain of the foot. However, when considering the disability and activity limitation domain, there was no statistically significant change as these may require a longer period of treatment for improvement in pronated feet.

Foot core exercises included in the protocol along with taping help enhance proprioceptive feedback, enabling individuals to make small adjustments in their posture and movement to effectively maintain balance. Strengthening these muscles through specific exercises such as toe curls, foot doming, and toe spreads not only improves foot muscle strength but also stabilises the arch’s structure, further enhancing overall foot stability (20),(21),(22). The purpose of the plantar fascia stretch was to improve the tension in the fascia by applying a sustained stretch to the fascia, recreating the mechanism of the windlass, and reducing microtrauma and inflammation associated with plantar fasciitis (22),(23),(24). The improvement in fascial tension due to stretching may have also helped in relieving pain, along with taping, caused by plantar fasciitis. This is supported by a previous study stating that performing stretching of the plantar fascia and Achilles tendon has been effective in reducing pain in the plantar fascia (22).

Furthermore, with taping intervention, exercises targeting the intrinsic foot muscles play an important role in managing balance by restoring functional limitations within the foot and contributing to controlling pronation, thereby supporting gait cycle dynamics and weight-bearing activities (25),(26),(27). The significant differences observed in dynamic balance and the FFI score among participants in group A underscore the efficacy of Mulligan’s calcaneal taping with strengthening exercises. Incorporating Mulligan calcaneal taping along with conventional therapy for the management of plantar fasciitis may offer clinicians an additional tool to improve dynamic balance and functional performance. Further studies can be conducted to assess the long-term effects of these interventions for a better understanding of changes. Similar studies can be conducted to assess the effects of these interventions on the strength of the intrinsic muscles of the foot and changes in lower limb kinematics.

Limitation(s)

The two-week intervention period could have limited the effectiveness of the intervention being studied.

Conclusion

Mulligan’s calcaneal taping, along with conventional physiotherapy, has significantly improved dynamic balance in the medial, posterior, and posteromedial directions. Other directions did not showed statistical significance, but clinical significance was noted, except for the posterolateral direction. The reason for this could be the two-week intervention. Additionally, functional performance did not showed any statistical difference, with only clinical significance observed in subjects with plantar fasciitis.

References

1.
Kumar S, Choudhary N, Kumar D, Nair A. To compare the effectiveness of calcaneal taping versus conventional therapy in the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2021;7(1):4310-30.
2.
Hyland MR, Webber-Gaffney A, Cohen L, Lichtman SW. Randomized controlled trial of calcaneal taping, sham taping, and plantar fascia stretching for the short-term management of plantar heel pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36(6):364-71. [crossref]
3.
Trojian T, Tucker AK. Plantar fasciitis. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(12):744-50.
4.
Petraglia F, Ramazzina I, Costantino C. Plantar fasciitis in athletes: Diagnostic and treatment strategies. A systematic review. Muscles, Ligaments, and Tendons Journal. 2017;7(1):107. [crossref]
5.
Welte L, Kelly LA, Lichtwark GA, Rainbow MJ. Influence of the windlass mechanism on arch-spring mechanics during dynamic foot arch deformation. J R Soc Interface. 2018;15(145):20180270. [crossref]
6.
de Morais Barbosa C, Barros Bértolo M, Marques Neto JF, Bellini Coimbra I, Davitt M, de Paiva Magalhães E. The effect of foot orthoses on balance, foot pain and disability in elderly women with osteoporosis: A randomized clinical trial. Rheumatology. 2013;52(3):515-22. [crossref]
7.
Crosby W, Humble RN. Rehabilitation of plantar fasciitis. Clinics in Podiatric Med Sur. 2001;18(2):225-31. [crossref]
8.
Genova JM, Gross MT. Effect of foot orthotics on calcaneal eversion during standing and treadmill walking for subjects with abnormal pronation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(11):664-75. [crossref]
9.
Shama SS, Kominsky SJ, Lemont H. Prevalence of non-painful heel spur and its relation to postural foot position. Journal of the American Podiatry Association. 1983;73(3):122-23. [crossref]
10.
Aishwarya NC, Sai KV. Immediate effect of calcaneal taping versus windlass taping on calcaneal angle in subjects with plantar fasciitis. Int J Ther Appl. 2016;33:28-32. [crossref]
11.
Koc Jr TA, Bise CG, Neville C, Carreira D, Martin RL, McDonough CM. Heel Pain-Plantar Fasciitis: Revision 2023: Clinical Practice Guidelines Linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health from the Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy and American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy of the American Physical Therapy Association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2023;53(12):CPG1-39. [crossref]
12.
Gribble PA, Hertel J, Plisky P. Using the star excursion balance test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: A literature and systematic review. J Athl Train. 2012;47(3):339-57. [crossref]
13.
Bressel E, Yonker JC, Kras J, Heath EM. Comparison of static and dynamic balance in female collegiate soccer, basketball, and gymnastics athletes. J Athl Train. 2007;42(1):42-46. PMID: 17597942; PMCID: PMC1896078.
14.
Budiman-Mak E, Conrad KJ, Roach KE. The foot function index: A measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(6):561-70. [crossref]
15.
Page P. Beyond statistical significance: Clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literature. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(5):726.
16.
Chamorro-Moriana G, Perez-Cabezas V, Benitez-Lugo M. Effectiveness of functional or biomechanical bandages with athletic taping and kinesiotaping in subjects with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Reviews. 2024;9(2):94-106. [crossref]
17.
Ayub A, Yale SH, Bibbo C. Common foot disorders. J Clin Med Res. 2005;3(2):116-19. [crossref]
18.
Wearing SC, Smeathers JE, Sullivan PM, Yates B, Urry SR, Dubois P. Plantar fasciitis: Are pain and fascial thickness associated with arch shape and loading? Physical Therapy. 2007;87(8):1002-08. [crossref]
19.
Kwong PK, Kay D, Voner RT, White MW. Plantar fasciitis. Mechanics and pathomechanics of treatment. Clin Sports Med. 1988;7(1):119-26. [crossref]
20.
Kim HJ, Cho J, Lee S. Talonavicular joint mobilization and foot core strengthening in patellofemoral pain syndrome: A single-blind, three-armed randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022;23(1):150. [crossref]
21.
Digiovanni BF, Nawoczenski DA, Malay DP, Graci PA, Williams TT, Wilding GE, et al. Plantar fascia-specific stretching exercise improves outcomes in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis: A prospective clinical trial with two-year follow-up. JBJS. 2006;88(8):1775-81. [crossref]
22.
Cole C, Seto C, Gazewood J. Plantar fasciitis: Evidence-based review of diagnosis and therapy. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72(11):2237-42.
23.
Ross M. Use of the tissue stress model as a paradigm for developing an examination and management plan for a patient with plantar fasciitis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002;92(9):499-506. [crossref]
24.
Banerjee G, Briggs M, Johnson MI. The effects of kinesiology taping on experimentally-induced thermal and mechanical pain in otherwise pain-free healthy humans: A randomised controlled repeated-measures laboratory study. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0226109. [crossref]
25.
MacGregor K, Gerlach S, Mellor R, Hodges PW. Cutaneous stimulation from patella tape causes a differential increase in vasti muscle activity in people with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(2):351-58. [crossref]
26.
Ferrari E, Cooper G, Reeves ND, Hodson-Tole EF. Intrinsic foot muscles act to stabilise the foot when greater fluctuations in centre of pressure movement result from increased postural balance challenge. Gait Posture. 2020;79:229-33. [crossref]
27.
Buchbinder R. Plantar fasciitis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(21):2159-66.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/71034.19707

Date of Submission: Apr 12, 2024
Date of Peer Review: May 01, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 18, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 12, 2024
• Manual Googling: May 09, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 17, 2024 (17%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com