Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 435864

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : DR01 - DR04 Full Version

Presence of Enteric Fever with Unusual Clinical Scenarios: A Case Series


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69057.19400
Vrushali Thakar, Mahadevan Kumar, Neetu Mehrotra, Prajakta Jadhav, Sunita Bhatawadekar

1. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 3. Fellow, Department of Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 4. Postgraduate Student, Department of Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Neetu Mehrotra,
Flat No. 4, B Building, Sacred Heart Town Society, Wanwadi, Pune City East-411040, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: mehrotraneetu@gmail.com

Abstract

Salmonella species are associated with bacteraemia, diarrhoea, as well as focal infections. Salmonella Typhi is the most pathogenic species. Salmonella Paratyphi B commonly affects immunocompromised hosts. The present case series showcases six cases of infection caused by typhoidal Salmonellae with unusual clinical scenarios. The first case report explains a case of neonatal meningitis where the causative agent was S. Paratyphi B. A case of lumbar spondylodiscitis is also reported where the aetiology was found to be Salmonella Typhi. Case three reports S. Typhi infection in a patient with Pre-B cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). S. Paratyphi B was isolated from a blood culture of a patient on haemodialysis and also from ascitic fluid from a case of Chronic Liver Disease (CLD). S. Typhi was isolated from the pleural fluid of a patient with carcinoma of the prostate.

Keywords

Meningitis, Salmonella Paratyphi B, Spondylodiscitis

A total of 14.3 million cases of enteric fever caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and Paratyphi were reported globally in 2017. I#IS. I?ITyphi was responsible for 11 million cases of typhoid fever and 120,000 deaths (1). Salmonella are enteric pathogens. However, dissemination of bacilli occurs throughout the body, which occasionally causes focal infections (2). There are few case reports of spondylodiscitis caused by I#IS. I?ITyphi. However, it is a rare clinical condition often misdiagnosed as Tuberculosis of the spine (3),(4). There are very few case reports of meningitis caused by I#IS. I?IParatyphi B from India (5),(6). Here, authors report a few unusual cases of Typhoidal Salmonella infections. The strains were identified along with Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST) by an automated method (Vitek 2, Biomerieux). Biochemical testing along with serotyping was carried out by conventional methods. Additional AST for chloramphenicol and azithromycin was done by the disc diffusion method (Kirby Bauer) as per the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines (7). Present series is of six cases which were reported from November 2022 to July 2023.

Case Report

Case 1

Meningitis in a newborn: A two-month-old male baby, full-term vaginal delivery, presented with a moderate-grade fever for eight days. The baby was exclusively breastfed in the first month of life, after which diluted unpasteurised cow milk was given to him. He had received Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and Oral Polio Vaccine (OPV) at birth. The baby was treated by a local practitioner with oral amoxicillin-clavulanic acid syrup and paracetamol syrup thrice a day for five days, but his condition worsened. He was admitted to our hospital for excessive irritability, refusal to feed, and an episode of seizure. A provisional diagnosis of meningitis was made based on the above symptoms, and the patient was initiated on Intravenous (iv) vancomycin 15 mg/kg/12 hourly (hrly) and ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg 12 hrly empirically. Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) analysis was suggestive of bacterial meningitis (Table/Fig 1). Blood and CSF on culture grew Salmonella enterica subsp enterica serovar Paratyphi B susceptible to ceftriaxone (Table/Fig 2). Radiological images [Table/Fig-3,4] showed features suggestive of meningitis, ventriculitis (lateral, 3rd, and 4th), and small lacunar vasculitic infarcts in the right frontal region along with intraventricular exudates. Vancomycin was discontinued, and iv ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg 12 hourly along with i.v. Levetiracetam 60 mg/kg/day, i.v. Fosphenytoin 5PE/Kg were administered. The baby was started on iv fluids. He was also transfused with Packed Cell Volume (PCV) 15 mL/kg due to low haemoglobin (7.9 gm/dL). Treatment was continued for three weeks. Repeat CSF analysis after one week showed improvement (Proteins- 131 mg/dL, glucose <5 mg/dL, nucleated cells-350/cumm, Neutrophils-80%). The baby showed clinical improvement after one week of antibiotic treatment and was started on oral feeds, which were well tolerated. Blood and stool culture of the infant’s mother were also done to ascertain the source of infection. Her blood culture showed no growth, and no pathogen was isolated from stool. So, the probable source of infection was likely unpasteurised milk or water used for its dilution. The baby was discharged after three weeks of treatment.

Case 2

Lumbar spondylodiscitis: A 59-year-old male presented with complaints of lower backache radiating to the abdomen and inguinal region for the past five months. It was present at rest and on walking. He also complained of difficulty in standing up from a sitting position. He had no co-morbidities, neurogenic claudication, or bowel/bladder complaints. He gave a history of steroid use for the past six months for pain relief. At the time of presentation, he was afebrile with stable vitals and no history of gastroenteritis. On examination, tenderness was present in the lumbosacral region of the spine. The haemogram revealed Hb-8.1 g/dL, TLC- 10300/cmm, PCV-27.9/cmm. Repeat haemogram done after two days showed a drop in TLC to 6500/cmm. The radiograph of the lumbar spine showed gross destruction at L2-3 disc and end plates. These findings were consistent with spondylodiscitis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the lumbosacral spine also showed L2-L3 spondylodiscitis with L3 vertebral body collapse. He was started on dexamethasone 8 mg iv 12 hourly, cefuroxime 1.5 gm iv 8 hourly, Dynapar 75 mg in 100 mL normal saline. L2-L3 wound debridement with posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion was done. The intraoperative tissue sample sent to the microbiology laboratory grew Salmonella Typhi susceptible to ceftriaxone (Table/Fig 2), based on which the patient was started on i.v. ceftriaxone (2 gm/12 hourly). He improved symptomatically and was discharged within seven days of treatment. He was prescribed oral cefixime 200 mg 12 hourly for 12 weeks and advised physiotherapy after discharge.

Case 3

Enteric fever in a child with Pre-B cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): A 10-year-old male child, a known case of Pre-B cell ALL diagnosed three months back and was put on chemotherapy one month back. He had a history of convulsion for one year, so was prescribed Tablet Lavera 500 mg twice a day by an outside medical practitioner. One month later, he presented with complaints of intermittent pain abdomen for two weeks. At the time of admission, he was afebrile with normal vitals and tenderness in the hypogastrium. Clinicians suspected drug-induced pancreatitis, so he was empirically started on i.v. meropenem (1 gm/8 hrly), i.v. fluids, and oral paracetamol for pain management. He had a history of convulsions so oral Lavera was also given. Laboratory investigations showed thrombocytopenia and macrocytosis (Table/Fig 1). Other parameters were within normal limits (Table/Fig 1). On ultrasonography of the abdomen and pelvis, hepatosplenomegaly was observed. His abdominal pain reduced after five days of treatment. As the patient tolerated oral food, his chemotherapy was restarted. On the seventh day of hospitalisation, he developed a fever, so a blood culture was sent, which grew Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, which was susceptible to ceftriaxone (Table/Fig 2). His antibiotic was de-escalated to ceftriaxone (1 gm/12 hourly), to which the patient responded well and was discharged after 14 days of treatment after developing a fever.

Case 4

Chronic kidney disease on haemodialysis: A 52-year-old man, a known case of diabetes mellitus and hypertension for three years, had a history of obstructive uropathy for which Double J stenting and cystoscopy had been done one year back. The stent was removed after one month of placement. After six months, the patient was diagnosed with a left eye cataract for which surgery was planned in an outside hospital. During preoperative evaluation, deranged renal function tests were noted (Serum creatinine-9.21, urea- 187). Due to this, he was referred to our hospital. At the time of admission, he had complaints of swelling on the face, arms, and legs. He also complained of shortness of breath on exertion since a month. The nephrologist’s opinion was taken. Haemodialysis was initiated in view of deranged Renal Function Test (RFT). The patient developed a fever on the second day of admission, so i.v. ceftriaxone (1 gm/12 hourly) was started. A blood culture was sent. Nested multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) (BioFire FilmArray, Biomerieux) detected Salmonella species. Automated system (Vitek2) and conventional methods identified the strain as Salmonella ser. Paratyphi B. The strain was susceptible to ceftriaxone and chloramphenicol (Table/Fig 2). The patient was treated with i.v. ceftriaxone (1 gm/12 hrly) and tablet azithromycin (500 mg/24 hours) for 14 days and was discharged after two weeks of hospitalisation. The patient was asymptomatic when he came for the next haemodialysis session after a month.

Case 5

Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) in Chronic Liver Disease (CLD): A 57-year-old male, a known case of decompensated CLD and liver cirrhosis for six months, presented with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting for the past four days. The patient was admitted due to the risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Injection Piperacillin tazobactam was started 3.375g eight hourly. On admission, laboratory investigations showed deranged liver function tests, raised creatinine, and low albumin (Table/Fig 1). Due to abdominal pain and swelling, ascitic paracentesis was performed, and ascitic fluid was sent for culture. Salmonella Paratyphi B, susceptible to ceftriaxone, was isolated (Table/Fig 2). However, the patient discharged against medical advice after five days and was lost to follow-up.

Case 6

Pleural effusion in a known case of prostate carcinoma with metastasis: A 72-year-old male, a known case of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, was diagnosed with prostate carcinoma with metastasis eight months ago. He underwent bilateral orchidectomy within a week of diagnosis and was advised 24 cycles of chemotherapy. He presented with decreased urine output, reduced appetite, generalised weakness, and incontinence over the past week. Urgent nephrology opinion was sought, and he was initiated on dialysis. Empirical treatment with meropenem (1 gm/8 hrly) was started due to leukocytosis. His chest radiograph revealed left-sided pleural effusion, for which thoracentesis was performed. I#IS.I?ITyphi was isolated from the pleural fluid, but blood culture did not show any growth. The isolate was susceptible to ceftriaxone, cotrimoxazole, and showed intermediate susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (Table/Fig 2). The patient was hospitalised for four days and unfortunately passed away due to complications of malignancy on the day the report was released.

Discussion

India contributes half of the estimated global burden of typhoid. Public vaccination efforts remain partially implemented. John J et al., studied the prevalence of typhoid fever in India and reported a high burden of typhoid fever in urban India despite improved sanitation (1). Salmonella Meningitis (SM) is a rare but severe form of bacterial meningitis caused by consuming contaminated water or food. It is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates (8). Dudhane RA et al., reported a rise in cases of non-typhoidal Salmonella infections in India (9). Sudhaharan S et al., conducted a study to analyse the spectrum of extraintestinal infections caused by Salmonella. The predominant species were S. typhimurium followed by S. enteritidis (10).

The first case of SM was reported by Ghon in 1908, caused by Salmonella Paratyphi B (11). Gunawan PI and Noviandi R reported a case of meningitis in a seven-month-old in Indonesia due to Salmonella Paratyphi B in 2022 (6). Halwani M and Batwai R reported a case in a four-month-old child from Saudi Arabia in 2016 (12). Mahalaxmi R et al., also reported Salmonella Paratyphi B meningitis in a 90-day-old infant from Chennai in 2016 (5).

Paediatricians in developing countries should consider Salmonella infection in their differential diagnosis when treating cases of meningitis in infants. Salmonella Meningitis (SM) is associated with significant mortality, morbidity, and treatment failure rates (5). Treatment with a third-generation cephalosporin for atleast four weeks is recommended to prevent relapse (13). Timely microbiological diagnosis is essential for initiating appropriate antibiotics to avoid unnecessary empirical use of antibiotics to cover gram-positive organisms. In first case, the source of infection was either unpasteurised milk or water used for dilution. The mother was asymptomatic, and the organism was not isolated from her stool or blood culture.

Various authors have reported lumbar spondylodiscitis caused by Salmonella Typhi (3),(4),(14). Salmonella spondylodiscitis is usually seen in patients with underlying conditions like leukaemia, diabetes, and patients on long-term steroids. However, spondylodiscitis caused by Salmonella has also been reported in immunocompetent patients without any predisposing factors (14). These cases clinically and radiologically mimic tuberculosis, so a microbiological culture of the intraoperative pus sample is essential to rule this out. Index patient had been on steroids for the past six months but had no history of gastroenteritis. Therefore, the source of infection in this case could not be ascertained. Amsalu T et al., have reported a higher prevalence of typhoid fever (4%) compared to paratyphoid fever (1.3%) in Ethiopia (15). I#IS.I?ITyphi was responsible for 75% of enteric fever cases, and the remaining 25% were caused by I#IS.I?Iparatyphi A. All six of present series patients were immunocompromised.

Bacterial peritonitis occurs as bacteria from the gut enter mesenteric lymph nodes and then the bloodstream, followed by seeding of bacteria in ascitic fluid. It is a common and serious complication of decompensated liver cirrhosis. Enteric gram negative bacilli are common causative organisms of peritonitis. It may rarely be caused by Salmonella species (16). Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) due to Salmonella Paratyphi B has been reported by Rizwana M and Appalaraju B (17). The same organism was isolated from the ascitic fluid in the case of liver cirrhosis in this particular case. Pleuropulmonary involvement of Salmonella infection is rare. Such involvement usually occurs in the elderly and those with underlying diseases such as diabetes mellitus, malignancy (18),(19). Index patient was immunocompromised due to underlying malignancy. There has been an increase in infections caused by drug-resistant Salmonella species worldwide (20). This increase is mainly due to the indiscriminate use of antibiotics (21). All six of index patients responded well to ceftriaxone. Some Salmonella strains were resistant to Ciprofloxacin.

Conclusion

Unusual clinical presentations and extraintestinal manifestations are commonly associated with an immunocompromised status. Timely collection of appropriate samples before initiating empirical antibiotics is essential to obtain a positive culture. A microbiological diagnosis is imperative to avoid unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and to prevent antimicrobial resistance.

References

1.
GBD 2017 Typhoid and Paratyphoid Collaborators. The global burden of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(4):369-81. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Huang DB, DuPont HL. Problem pathogens: Extra-intestinal complications of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(6):341-48. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Das S, Bandyopadhyay R, Hansdak SG. Case report of infective spondylodiscitis due to nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella paratyphi A. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(1):554-57. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Chang IC. Salmonella spondylodiscitis in patients without sickle cell disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(430):243-47. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Mahalakshmi R, Rajeshbabu B, Mohan R, Balakumaran D, Venkataraman P, Vinoth PN. Salmonella paratyphi B meningitis in an infant. Australas Med J. 2013;6(7):350-53. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Gunawan PI, Noviandi R. Salmonella Paratyphi B meningitis in an infant: The First Report in Indonesia. Medico Legal Update. 2022;22(3):63-65. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v22i3.3309. [crossref]
7.
Clinical and Laboratory Standard (CLSI). 2023. Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 33rd edition. CLSI supplement. Wayne PA.
8.
Elouali A, Ouerradi N, Ayad G, Babakhouya A, Rkain M. Salmonella meningitis in a young infant: A case report. Cureus. 2023;15(8):e44147. [crossref]
9.
Dudhane RA, Bankar NJ, Shelke YP, Badge AK. The rise of non-typhoidal salmonella infections in India: Causes, symptoms, and prevention. Cureus. 2023:15(10):e46699. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Sudhaharan S, Kanne P, Vemu L, Bhaskara A. Extraintestinal infections caused by nontyphoidal Salmonella from a tertiary care center in India. J Lab Physicians. 2018;10(4):401-05. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Kim KS. Acute bacterial meningitis in infants and children. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(1):32-42. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Halwani M, Batwai R. A case of meningitis caused by Salmonella Paratyphi Type B in a four months-old infant. Clin Trials Pathol Case Stud. 2016;1(1):26- 28. Available from: https://www.ommegaonline.org.
13.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Infectious Diseases. (2000). Salmonella infections. In Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 25th edn, (Peter, G., Ed), pp. 503. American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL.
14.
Saravu K, Bhat SN, Gupta N. Spondylodiscitis due to Salmonella Typhi: A series of four cases. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2021;28:11-12. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Amsalu T, Genet C, Adem Siraj Y. Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility profile and factors associated with enteric fever infection in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):7359. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Bacon BR. Cirrhosis and its complications. In: Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson ]L, Loscalzo J editors. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine. 17th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008;1971-80.
17.
Rizwana M, Appalaraju B. Salmonella paratyphi B- A rare cause of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2022;65(2):513-14. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Rim MS, Park CM, Ko KH, Lim SC, Park KO. Pleural empyema due to Salmonella: A case report. Korean J Intern Med. 2000;15(2):138-41. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Samir Abdelhafiz A, Wassef M, Alorabi M. Pleural empyema due to Salmonella in a patient with bronchogenic carcinoma: The first case report from a cancer hospital in Egypt. Access Microbiol. 2020;2(9):acmi000151. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Threlfall EJ. Antimicrobial drug resistance in Salmonella: Problems and perspectives in food- and water-borne infections. EMS Microbiol Rev. 2002;26(2):141-48. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Wu W, Wang H, Lu J, Wu J, Chen M, Xu Y, et al. Genetic diversity of Salmonella enteric serovar Typhi and Paratyphi in Shenzhen, China from 2002 through 2007. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:32. [crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69057.19400

Date of Submission: Dec 13, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jan 15, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Mar 14, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 13, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 08, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Mar 11, 2024 (7%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com