Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 255011

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : KF01 - KF05 Full Version

Effectiveness of MusicGlove on Motor and Psychological Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: A Quasi-experimental Study


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68324.19457
Nicky Reginald, U Ganapathy Sankar, Monisha Ravikumar, Redkar Simran Sandeep

1. MOT Student, SRM College of Occupational Therapy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor and Dean, SRM College of Occupational Therapy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. PhD Research Scholar, SRM College of Occupational Therapy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Research Scholar, SRM College of Occupational Therapy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. U Ganapathy Sankar,
Professor and Dean, SRM College of Occupational Therapy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, SRM Nagar, Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu-603203, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: ganapatu@srmist.edu.in

Abstract

Introduction: Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease commonly experience both physical and psychological effects, which subsequently affect their ability to perform daily activities and overall wellbeing. MusicGlove is an emerging adjunct proposed to address the motor issues but also the psychological ones with references to improving motivation and participation in individuals with Parkinson’s Disease.

Aim: To determine the effectiveness of the MusicGlove on hand dexterity and the psychological response in individuals with Parkinson’s disease.

Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental study was performed on 40 individuals with Parkinson disease January 2021 to June 2021 from local community settings in Chengalpattu district, Tamil Nadu, India. They were recruited and divided into a control group (n=20) and experimental group (n=20). Hand dexterity and psychological responses were assessed using the Box and Block Test (BBT), Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI), and Apathy Inventory (AI) as pre and post-test measures. Both groups received conventional occupational therapy for three weeks in total, and in addition to this, the experimental group received the MusicGlove. The control group included muscle stretching and strengthening activities with therapeutic putty and using activities such as connecting circles where the subject is given a sheet of paper with 25 circles, each containing 25 numbers or letters. They were asked to connect these in ascending, alternating numerical, and alphabetical order. Sessions were conducted for 30 minutes with two sets of repetitions. Descriptive statistics were used to examine data using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0.

Results: The study results revealed that there was no statistically significant difference found between the groups but clinically significant differences were found between the groups with post-test scores on motor symptoms that were measured by BBT: μ=-1.2534, p=0.211 (BBT Dominant); μ=-0.9400, p-value=0.3472 (BBT Non Dominant), and psychological symptoms that were measured by BDI; (μ=-1.0445, p-value=0.2983) and AI; (μ=-1.0445, p-value=0.9203).

Conclusion: The study concluded that conventional occupational therapy along with MusicGlove was effective in improving hand dexterity and psychological responses in Parkinson’s disease patients. Also, further study needs to be conducted to warrant its long-term impact of intervention on hand dexterity and psychological responses.

Keywords

Assistive technology, Dexterity, Occupational therapy

Dexterity is the ability of the hand to perform various coordinated hand and finger movement patterns that become refined and well-executed as an individual develops. In Parkinson’s disease, the exact cause of dexterity problems is currently unknown. However, due to the effects near the higher centers, namely the cortex-more accurately, the premotor and supplementary motor areas-resultant lesions affecting these portions cause reduced signal transfer to the subcortical structures, namely the commissures, the cerebellum, basal ganglia, etc., which thereby reduce the refinement of movement, causing not only hand dexterity unilaterally but bilaterally as well (1). Parkinson’s disease patients, in addition to the tremors, rigidity, and bradykinesia, experience difficulty in performing their daily tasks and occupations due to unilateral and bilateral involvement, rendering them dependent (2).

The psychological impact on Parkinson’s disease patients is not uncommon, affecting everyday tasks, mood, and motivation of the person to engage in activities. It has been shown that various psychological responses that Parkinson’s disease patients experience are related to a variety of causes, out of which the neurotransmitter concept stands out. Here, due to lesions within or directly to the cortical and subcortical areas, there is a reduction or inhibition of various neurotransmitters, specifically 5-Hydroxytrypamine, which distinguishes its role in depression and anxiety within Parkinson’s disease patients (3). Acting as a transporter protein molecule, its functions are inhibited due to various causes, such as alterations in genetic expression and others that include the lack of production of these proteins. However, the inadequacy of this molecule attributes to the varied states of anxiety and depression, leading to various limitations in occupations and activities of daily living with responses such as avolition, anhedonia, etc., (3).

Music acts as a specific stimulus to obtain motor and emotional responses by combining movement and stimulation of different sensory pathways. The efficacy of active Music Therapy (MT) on motor and emotional functions in patients with Parkinson’s disease shows effective motor, affective, and behavioural functions, recommending active MT as a new method for inclusion in Parkinson’s disease rehabilitation programs (4). The MusicGlove caters to the needs pertaining to physical dysfunction but also the emotional and psychological responses. Ten participants diagnosed with stroke, exhibiting severe to moderate hand impairment, engaged in the study for four sessions over two weeks using the glove. The primary outcome measure was the BBT. The results showed that the MusicGlove was shown to be a motivating device for repetitive training of functional hand grips, with music significantly increasing performance and motivation among the participants (5). Interventions involving music play a crucial role in the rehabilitation of Parkinson’s disease, effectively addressing both motor and non motor symptoms and yielding promising results on motor symptoms and psychological responses. However, literature on non motor symptoms is scarce in number therefore results are less certain results (6).

Moreover, a study conducted on chronic stroke patients with moderate hemiparesis, randomly assigned to use the MusicGlove, isometric, or conventional hand therapy, showed significant changes in the group that received the MusicGlove showing that it not only addressed the motor issues but also psychological aspects, such as motivation and participation (7). Interventions involving music offers a key ground rehabilitating Parkinson’s disease, effectively impacting both motor and non motor symptoms, and producing promising results on motor symptoms and psychological responses (8).

The MusicGlove is just not a good device for hand-based rehabilitation in stroke population only, but that the versatility of this device needs to be tested on other populations with similar hand impairments. Currently, there is no evidence supporting hand-based technological interventions that incorporate both hand dexterity and psychological responses specifically in Parkinson’s disease. Hence, the present study aims to establish the effectiveness of the MusicGlove on hand dexterity and psychological responses in Parkinson’s disease.

Material and Methods

A quasi-experimental study design was opted for this study. Data collection was conducted from the Chengalpattu district from January to June 2021 over a six-month period. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) of SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Center, SRMIST, Chengalpattu, with ethical clearance number 2078/IEC/2020. Dependent variables included hand dexterity and psychological responses, while the independent variable was the MusicGlove. A total of 40 participants were incorporated from local housing facilities with Parkinson’s disease and institutional records through convenience sampling. Informed consent was obtained from participants.

Inclusion criteria: Parkinson’s disease patients with Hoehn and Yahr scale stage 2-3 (9),(10); Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (11),(12),(13) non motor (psychological response) 4/16 and motor (hand dexterity) 50/108, suggesting mild to moderate impairment; Age between 55-65 years; Mini-Mental State Examination score >24 (14),(15); Both male and female participants were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with severe cognitive impairments, visual impairment, hearing impairment, physical impairment, or disability were excluded from the study.

Procedure

Overall, data collection lasted for 12 weeks. Baseline measures included the Box and Block Test (BBT) (16),(17),(18), Becks Depression Inventory (BDI) (19), and Apathy Inventory (AI) (20), followed by post-test data collection after the intervention.

Screening Tools

1. Hoehn and Yahr Scale: Extensively used for clinical grading, this scale defines a wide range of motor function as well as non motor functions and the progression of Parkinson’s disease stages over time. It is a freely available scale. The scoring and interpretation include stages from unilateral involvement to confinement to a wheelchair/bed (10).

2. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): This scale is widely used, having four sections focusing on non motor aspects, motor aspects, motor examination, and motor complications in Parkinson’s disease. Each symptom is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with increased scores indicating more severe impairment. The maximum total score is 199. The scale has good utility and excellent clinimetric properties making it viable to use amidst a broad spectrum of Parkinson’s disease. It has high concurrent validity and internal consistency (11),(12),(13).

3. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): This tool assesses various cognitive status, encompassing skills such as comprehension, reading, writing, orientation, and drawing abilities. Scoring ranges from no impairment to severe cognitive impairment. The MMSE has high concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, and inter-rater reliability. It is a freely available scale (14),(15).

Outcome Measures

1. BBT: It measures unilateral gross manual dexterity and is administered by asking the client to move blocks, one by one, from one compartment of a box to another of equal size within 60 seconds. To establish and record baseline scores, initiate the test with the unaffected upper limb. Furthermore, a 15-second trial period is allowed at the start of each side. Clients are scored based on the number of blocks transferred from one compartment to the other in 60 seconds (17). Higher scores indicate better manual dexterity. The test-retest reliability for BBT was reported as excellent (ICC=0.97 for the right hand and ICC=0.96 for the left hand) (18). The inter-rater reliability of BBT, as shown by Pearson correlation coefficients, showed excellent agreement (r=1.00 for the right hand and r=0.99 for the left hand). The validity of BBT was established by comparing it to the Functional Autonomy Measurement System (FAMS) (17), showing excellent correlations (r=0.80) with the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Pearson correlations were also found between the BBT and the FAMS (r=0.47 for the right hand and r=0.51 for the left hand). It is a paid scale.

2. BDI: The BDI measures clinical observations of depression at cognitive, emotional, and emotional levels, consolidating 21 symptoms and attitudes rated from 0 to 3 in terms of intensity. Items were chosen to assess the intensity of depression. The 21 symptoms and attitudes include: Mood, Pessimism, Sense of Failure, Lack of Satisfaction, Guilt Feelings, Sense of Punishment, Self-dislike, Self-accusation, Suicidal Wishes, Crying, Irritability, Social Withdrawal, Indecisiveness, Distortion of Body Image, Work Inhibition, Sleep Disturbance, Fatigability, Loss of Appetite, Weight Loss, Somatic Preoccupation, and Loss of Libido. The BDI is often self-administered and generally takes 5-10 minutes to complete (15). It is scored from 0 to 3 to reflect intensity and summed linearly to create a total score ranging from 0 to 63. Scores of 0-9 indicate negligible/minimal depression, 10-18 indicate mild to moderate depression, 19-29 indicate moderate to severe depression, and 30-63 indicate severe depression. The coefficient alpha was 0.87. Regarding test-retest reliability, the BDI’s correlations are greater than 0.60. The concurrent validity of the BDI with respect to other measures of depression is high, as it is not only related to clinical assessments of depression (>0.60) but also demonstrates strong positive relations (19). It is a freely available scale.

3. Apathy Inventory (AI): The scale consists of three dimensions, namely lack of interest, emotional blunting, and lack of interest, which are useful for screening the presence of apathy and determining its severity. The scale is administered while the participant engages in activities, enabling the administrator to score accordingly. Each question is scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe), with the total score (range 0-12) calculated by summing the scores of every item. Each item has several characteristic signs and symptoms that enable the administrator to score accordingly. Scoring from 0 to 4 is considered severe, 5-9 is moderate, and 9 to 12 is mild. The interrater reliability is 0.81, test-retest reliability is 0.90, and the high internal validity Cronbach’s alpha is 0.76 (20). It is a freely available scale.

Intervention Protocol

Control group: The control group consisted of 20 individuals. The protocol included muscle stretching and strengthening activities with therapeutic putty (21), and using activities such as connecting circles. In this activity, the subject is given a sheet of paper with 25 circles, each containing 25 numbers or letters. They are asked to connect these in ascending, alternating numerical, and alphabetical order. Sessions were conducted for 30 minutes with two sets of repetitions. These activities have been proven effective over the counterpart therapeutic intervention and are still used in practice to address issues with hand dexterity. In addition to this cognitive behaviour techniques were used to motivate and address the psychological response.

Experimental group: The experimental group also consisted of 20 individuals. The protocol included basic instruction and orientation of the MusicGlove, along with specific instructions on how to operate it, don and doff the glove, play the game, and hit or strike a note. This was done for 15 minutes. Following this, the actual therapy began, which included a trial or tutorial within the game attempted for one minute. Subsequently, the main program was initiated, containing songs for dexterity with a duration of 70 notes in one minute and 26 seconds, and speed, which included 90 notes to be hit under one minute and 50 seconds. and soon after, they were made to play a total of 12 songs interconnecting dexterity and speed, taking roughly 45 minutes (Table/Fig 1). After completion, the final scores were obtained on the application, denoting various aspects of dexterity denoted by the number of notes hit or missed (5),(7).

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to examine data distribution and group them using SPSS version 24.0 Outcome measures data within and between groups were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. The hypothesis was tested against the data to reveal any statistically significant difference, thereby showing the effect of treatment, denoted by an Alpha level of p-value=0.05.

Results

(Table/Fig 2) showed that there was no statistically significant difference seen between the pretest and post-test scores of BBT Dominant, BBT non dominant, BDI, and AI (z-value=-1.826, p-value=0.068; z-value=-1.841, p-value=0.066; z-value=-1.841, p-value=0.066; z-value=-1.841, p-value=0.066), respectively in the control group. However, upon observing the pretest and post-test data, it shows that the data was data was clinically significant based mean difference between pre-test and post-test scores.

(Table/Fig 3) showed that there was no statistically significant difference seen between the pretest and post-test scores of BBT dominant, BBT non dominant, BDI, AI, MusicGlove speed, and dexterity (z-value=-1.857, p-value=0.063; z-value=-1.461, p-value=0.144; z-value=-1.841, p-value=0.066; z-value=-1.890, p-value=0.059; z-value=-1.841, p-value=0.066; z-value=-1.841, p-value=0.066), respectively in the experimental group.

(Table/Fig 4) showed that there was no statistically significant difference seen between the pretest scores of BBT dominant, BBT non-dominant, BDI, and AI (μ-value=-1.2534, p-value=0.211; μ-value=-0.9400, p-value=0.3472; μ-value=-1.0445, p-value=0.2983; μ-value=-1.0445, p-value=0.9203), respectively.

Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the post-test scores of BBT, BDI and AI where the results showed that there was no statistically significant difference seen between the pre-test and post-test scores of BBT Dominant, BBT Non-dominant, BDI and AI (μ-value=-1.432, p-value=0. 0.321; μ-value=-0.856, p-value=0.246; μ-value=-1.135, p-value=0.371; μ-value=-0.254, p-value=0.325) respectively (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The study has provided insights towards the use of the MusicGlove in Parkinson rehabilitation; however, the results of the present study have not claimed to be statistically significant. The non significant results of the study may have been linked to a variety of causes, which might have included increased session duration, frequency, fatigue, lack of motivation, and adherence to the intervention. The control group had performed the conventional intervention protocol for hand function developed (21), which included muscle strengthening activities using therapeutic putty (soft and medium resistance) to improve hand and finger function. Starting from a global to a specific pattern, which needed clients to roll the putty, shape and mold it to an object using unilateral and bilateral movements along with digital and palmar assistance. In addition to this, subjects were asked to connect circles and dots, which formed numbers or letters in an alternating manner. These activities worked on the principle of repetition and intensity, which in turn evoked a learning experience, thus providing the basis for improvement in the functional use of the hand within these subjects (22).

The effect on manual dexterity within Parkinson’s disease patients is mainly attributed to the three cardinal symptoms (bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremors), which indirectly affect movement patterns, speed, and intensity overall. With repeated practice and feedback of these movements, it was concluded to be an effective means to enable some degree of functional independence within these patients. Generally, dexterity is segregated into fast-acting or early selection where the appropriate type of grip needed is selected, followed by the resultant force generated to execute and maintain the grip in regards to its orientation, modulation, and intended use, which corresponds to the movements within the spectrum of hand functions and, hence, translates into everyday functional tasks.

The experimental group underwent both traditional occupational therapy intervention and MusicGlove, which enabled better adherence to the intervention and better motivation to engage. The MusicGlove was designed to improve dexterity within the stroke population, but the present study strived to determine its effectiveness in Parkinson’s disease patients. The MusicGlove is primarily built upon the foundation of sensorimotor learning, based on repetition and feedback. Sensorimotor learning occurs due to various interactions between neurons, cortical, and subcortical systems, which integrate multisystem information to bring about a response that is not reflexive. In Parkinson’s disease patients, the cortical areas pertaining to the premotor, prefrontal, and temporal cortex are closely related to the resultant bradykinesia, tremors, and rigidity (23). Since the primary area of lesion in Parkinson’s disease patients is within the basal ganglia, the various nigrostriatal pathways interconnecting the cortical and subcortical areas are compromised as the disease progresses. Hence, a combination of various information across the cortex is not appropriately perceived and interpreted, causing disturbances in performance. When using the MusicGlove, the visual and auditory sensations are relayed to the higher centers, which then process the information and relay the signals back to the end organ, passing through the descending pathways. Following this, the resultant output is depicted by the hand gestures performed by the participant. When this process is repeated, it invokes various neural circuits that get activated, causing sensorimotor learning to occur (24).

The effect of music as a major contributor in the management of psychological responses in various conditions has long been documented by several authors who suggest that music is a key factor in managing various psychological responses like depression, anxiety, apathy, insomnia, etc., (25).

Using the MusicGlove, psychological responses are catered to in the songs being heard and played. Participants hear the song and perform the corresponding actions, to which the songs continue to play. If not, then the music skips to the next note to be played. Music plays a vital role in the activation of several synaptic neural circuits within the auditory and premotor areas, which causes subsequent activation of the regions that have been rendered inactive. Coupled with motor performance, this translates into smoother and more fluid movement (26). MusicGlove integrates these foundational literatures, where when patients engage in the MusicGlove while listening to the music, the areas of the brain responsible for processing sound and frequency get activated. This, in turn, activates several synaptic neural circuits which, along with sound, process the outgoing motor impulses from the cortical centers to the subcortical structures, enabling movements within Parkinson’s disease patients to become smooth, coordinated, and intentional. In addition to this, sensorimotor learning is implemented as a result of repetitive performance.

The experimental group shows statistically significant improvement in hand dexterity and psychological response. Moreover, participants in the experimental group adhered to the intervention and were motivated to engage in the intervention due to the attractive overlay of the device (visual and auditory feedback) compared to the control group; in addition to this, participants under experimental group experienced fatigue due to the intense repetition of movements. This is in agreement with a previous study (11) which suggested that repetitive finger movement causes movement arrest and early fatigue within Parkinson’s disease patients.

There were a few observations made about the usability of the MusicGlove in our participants. Frequent fatigue symptoms were reported by clients. This draws our attention to the need for further studies to evaluate the usability of this device.

Clinical Implications

Hand dexterity and psychological response in Parkinson’s disease are an emergent field where surplus data is not readily available. Hence, the current study aimed to find the effectiveness of the MusicGlove for dexterity and psychological response. The findings suggest that the MusicGlove is effective in improving hand dexterity and psychological response in Parkinson’s disease patients. Moreover, it can be easily used to keep the participant engaged in the intervention with appropriate breaks to address the issue of early fatigue. The MusicGlove may be used to improve hand dexterity and psychological response in Parkinson’s patients.

Limitation(s)

Firstly, a smaller sample size and secondly, convenience sampling were used. Further controlled studies are needed to generalise the effectiveness of MusicGlove in Parkinson’s disease.

Conclusion

The present study concluded that MusicGlove intervention shows improvement in hand dexterity and psychological response in Parkinson’s disease patients. Future studies need to be conducted on a larger population, and the study can be conducted to improve the generalisation; also, the effects of fatigue while using the MusicGlove need to be addressed. Integration of both dominant and non dominant hands in MusicGlove intervention should be explored to determine any implications on functionality after using MusicGlove in activities of daily living. Lastly, the long-term depth of MusicGlove on manual dexterity and psychological response in Parkinson’s disease patients needs to be investigated.

References

1.
Wiesendanger M, Serrien DJ. Neurological problems affecting hand dexterity. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001;36(2-3):161-68. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Benecke R, Rothwell JC, Dick JP, Day BL, Marsden CD. Disturbance of sequential movements in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain. 1987;110(Pt 2):361-79. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Kummer A, Harsányi E, Dias FM, Cardoso F, Caramelli P, Teixeira AL. Depression impairs executive functioning in Parkinson disease patients with low educational level. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2009;22(3):167-72. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Pacchetti C, Mancini F, Aglieri R, Fundarò C, Martignoni E, Nappi G. Active music therapy in Parkinson’s disease: An integrative method for motor and emotional rehabilitation. Psychosom Med. 2000;62(3):386-93. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Friedman N, Chan V, Zondervan D, Bachman M, Reinkensmeyer DJ. MusicGlove: Motivating and quantifying hand movement rehabilitation by using functional grips to play music. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:2359-63. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Pohl A, Anders S, Chen H, Patel HJ, Heller J, Reetz K, et al. Impaired emotional mirroring in Parkinson’s disease-A study on brain activation during processing of facial expressions. Front Neurol. 2017;8:682. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Zondervan DK, Friedman N, Chang E, Zhao X, Augsburger R, Reinkensmeyer DJ, et al. Home-based hand rehabilitation after chronic stroke: Randomized, controlled single-blind trial comparing the MusicGlove with a conventional exercise program. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(4):457-72. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Raglio A. Music therapy interventions in Parkinson’s Disease: The state-of-the-art. Front Neurol. 2015;6:185. Doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00185. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Goetz CG. The history of Parkinson’s disease: Early clinical descriptions and neurological therapies. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2011;1(1):a008862. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17(5):427-42. Doi: 10.1212/wnl.17.5.427. PMID: 6067254. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Stegemöller EL, Uzochukwu J, Tillman MD, McFarland NR, Subramony SH, Okun MS, et al. Repetitive finger movement performance differs among Parkinson’s disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and spinocerebellar ataxia. J Clin Mov Disord. 2015;2:6. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB, Goldstein M. Recent developments in Parkinson’s Disease, Vol 2. Florham Park, NJ. Macmillan Health Care Information. 1987.
13.
Hauser RA, Lyons KE, Pahwa R. The UPDRS-8: A brief clinical assessment scale for Parkinson’s Disease. Int J Neurosci. 2012;122(7):333-37. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189-98. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: A comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(9):922-35. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Figueiredo S. The box and block test (BBT). Stroke Engine. 2011.
17.
Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the box and block test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386-91. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the box and block test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: Reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(7):751-55. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561-71. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Starkstein SE, Mayberg HS, Preziosi TJ, Andrezejewski P, Leiguarda R, Robinson RG. Reliability, validity, and clinical correlates of apathy in Parkinson’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1992;4(2):134-39. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Mateos-Toset S, Cabrera-Martos I, Torres-Sánchez I, Ortiz-Rubio A, González- Jiménez E, Valenza MC. Effects of a single hand-exercise session on manual dexterity and strength in persons with Parkinson disease: A randomized controlled trial. PM R. 2016;8(2):115-22. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Swinnen SP, Schmidt RA, Nicholson DE, Shapiro DC. Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. J Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1990;16(4):706-16. [crossref]
23.
Baradaran N, Tan SN, Liu A, Ashoori A, Palmer SJ, Wang ZJ, et al. Parkinson’s disease rigidity: Relation to brain connectivity and motor performance. Front Neurol. 2013;4:67. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Makino H, Hwang EJ, Hedrick NG, Komiyama T. Circuit mechanisms of sensorimotor learning. Neuron. 2016;92(4):705-21. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Raglio A, Attardo L, Gontero G, Rollino S, Groppo E, Granieri E. Effects of music and music therapy on mood in neurological patients. World J Psychiatry. 2015;5(1):68-78. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Amengual JL, Rojo N, Veciana de Las Heras M, Marco-Pallarés J, Grau-Sánchez J, Schneider S, et al. Sensorimotor plasticity after music-supported therapy in chronic stroke patients revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61883.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/68324.19457

Date of Submission: Oct 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jan 09, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Mar 29, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval Obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 28, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 06, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Mar 25, 2024 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com