Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 244319

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : May | Volume : 18 | Issue : 5 | Page : SD01 - SD03 Full Version

Congenital Absence of Ileum, Caecum and Appendix in a Preterm Neonate: A Rare Case Report


Published: May 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/66939.19361
Asritha Komandla, Aditi Rawat, Sagar Karotkar

1. Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Resident, Department of Neonatology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Neonatology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Asritha Komandla,
Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha-442005, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: ashritharao94@gmail.com

Abstract

There are numerous birth defects that can affect the gastrointestinal tract, starting from the oesophagus or stomach to the small and large intestines. Intestinal atresias are one of the most common causes of intestinal obstruction in newborns. The most common location is the jejunum, followed by the duodenum and the colon. Congenital absence of the ileum, caecum, and appendix is an extremely rare condition. Here, an exceptional instance of congenital absence involving the distal jejunum, ileum, caecum, and appendix in a male child is presented, who presented with chief complaints of multiple episodes of bilious vomiting after initiating the first feed and non passage of meconium. Upon initial examination, the patient was suspected to have an intestinal obstruction and subsequently underwent an exploratory laparotomy. However, intraoperative findings revealed a grossly dilated proximal jejunal loop, and the next segment of the intestine was the narrow ascending colon. In due course, the baby recovered well and was discharged. Currently, there is no documented occurrence of a comparable case involving a viable neonate in the existing body of scholarly literature. Surgeons need to understand positional variations and congenital anomalies, as well as the procedures needed to identify these abnormalities during surgery.

Keywords

Ascending colon, Congenital atresia, Intestinal obstruction, Jejunum

Case Report

A male child, weighing 2058 grams, born to a primigravida mother at the gestational age of 35 weeks by vaginal delivery, was brought to the neonatology department at 12 hours of life with chief complaints of multiple episodes of bilious vomiting after initiating the first feed and non passage of meconium. The antenatal history was not significant. As the patient was from a rural background, no earlier ultrasound was done. On admission, the baby appeared lethargic, had a weak cry, and was vitally stable with a heart rate of 134 beats/min, a respiratory rate of 44 cycles/min, blood pressure of 64/40 mmHg, and SpO2 of 95%. On systemic examination, the abdomen was shiny, grossly distended. Palpation revealed a soft, non tender abdomen with no organomegaly, and bowel sounds were absent on auscultation. The infant was kept nil by mouth, initiated on total parenteral nutrition, started on empirical antibiotics (Aampicillin 50 mg/kg 12 hourly and gentamicin 5 mg/kg/day for five days), and had a nasogastric tube inserted into the gastric cavity. The blood tests yielded normal results, while the X-ray of the erect abdomen (Table/Fig 1) indicated notable bowel dilatation accompanied by a scarcity of gas in the pelvic region.

The clinical presentation and X-ray revealed intestinal atresia, and the baby was taken for emergency exploratory laparotomy. Preanaesthetic evaluation revealed normal vitals and blood parameters. A right transverse supraumbilical incision was made, revealing a grossly dilated proximal Jejunal loop which terminated blindly 20 cm from the duodeno-Jejunal flexure. There was an absent distal jejunum and complete absence of the ileum, appendix, and caecum. A narrow ascending colon, transverse colon, and descending colon were noted (Table/Fig 2). The patency of the colon was confirmed by milking saline from the ascending colon down to the rectum, which excluded distal intestinal obstruction. Excisional tapering of the dilated distal jejunum was done, followed by end-to-end anastomosis of the tapered jejunum with the ascending colon. The baby had a good postoperative recovery. On the seventh surgical day, the nasogastric tube was withdrawn, and nursing commenced. The patient exhibited no instances of bilious vomiting upon consuming breast milk and was discharged on the 19th day following the surgical procedure. The parents were explained regarding the nutritional morbidity associated with this condition and were advised to have regular follow-up. However, the baby succumbed at home after one week.

Discussion

Atresia is a prevalent aetiological factor contributing to neonatal intestinal obstruction. Current thinking suggests that a vascular injury within the uterus is to blame (1). Four forms of intestinal atresia are now recognised in the medical community’s categorisation scheme (2). The reported incidence of intestinal atresia ranges from 1.3 to 3.5 per 10,000 live births, of which approximately 20% are associated with a chromosomal anomaly (3). This particular instance represents a rare occurrence of intestinal atresia characterised by the complete absence of the ileum, caecum, and appendix. To the best of our understanding, this particular instance represents the initial occurrence in which the infant underwent a successful operation and subsequently received discharge while being nourished through breastfeeding.

Short bowel syndrome may be avoided with surgical techniques such as intestinal plication and proximal tapering enteroplasty. Bianchi’s recommended longitudinal intestinal lengthening and tailoring operation, as well as Javid PJ et al., supported serial transverse enteroplasty treatment, are both surgical therapies intended for individuals with a minimum amount of functional small intestine (4). In this particular instance, a tapering enteroplasty procedure was conducted on the distal jejunum, which was subsequently followed by an end-to-end jejuno-colic anastomosis. Functional obstruction at the site of anastomosis is a frequently observed postoperative complication in cases of intestinal atresia. Literature reports a few cases of congenital absence and abnormalities of the intestine (5),(6),(7),(8).

Tripathy PK et al., reported a case of a 16-day-old female newborn who underwent exploratory laparotomy and was found to have her jejunum and ileum absent from birth (5). Blind termination of the dilated duodenum was observed, and the following section of the intestine consisted of a microcolon and a peanut-sized caecum. The appendix and caecum were removed. To verify colonic patency, saline was pushed into the colon and milked in a microcolon all the way to the rectum. The duodenum was opened at the distal dependent portion, and a 5-0 polyglactin suture was used to perform a single-layer end-to-back anastomosis with the ascending colon. The baby’s postoperative recovery went smoothly.

Salim A et al., reported the first-ever occurrence of congenital absence of the appendix in association with malrotation. A Ladd’s procedure was performed in the standard fashion, with evisceration of bowel loops, division of Ladd’s bands, broadening of the mesentery, and replacement of bowel loops within the abdominal cavity in a non rotated position (7). Sham M and Singh D conducted a study on a neonate who presented with near-total jejunoileal atresia (8). Despite the severity of the condition, the neonate managed to survive for a period of three months.

In 1884, Thomas WJTL documented a postmortem discovery concerning a premature infant born at seven months gestation, which revealed a total absence of the jejunum, ileum, and a significant portion of the colon (9). There are only two documented cases of congenital absence of the small bowel. In both instances, the affected individuals exhibited intact duodenums and colons. Infants commonly exhibit symptoms such as bilious emesis, abdominal distention, and failure to pass meconium. The clinical manifestation exhibits variability depending on the specific site of the atretic obstruction. Proximal atresia is characterised by the occurrence of notable bilious emesis, whereas distal atresia is commonly associated with abdominal distention accompanied by the presence of multiple dilated bowel loops (5),(10). Louw JH and Barnard CN were the first to provide evidence supporting the hypothesis that vascular injury during pregnancy is the primary cause of jejunoileal atresia (11). Intestinal atresia is classified according to research performed by Louw JH and Barnard CN in 1955. There are four types of intestinal atresia. Type 1 is characterised by a mucosal web or diaphragm. Type 2 involves an atretic cord located between two blind ends of bowel, with an intact mesentery. Complete mesenteric separation at the blind ends of the gut (type 3a) results in a V-shaped mesenteric gap. Finally, type 3b has a big mesenteric gap and looks like an apple peel or Christmas tree. Type 4 presents with the presence of multiple atresias, exhibiting a characteristic string-like morphology reminiscent of a sausage. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that complete jejunoileal atresia has not been included in any of the existing classification systems (11). The present case cannot be classified as it is a case of complete absence of the ileum, caecum, and appendix. While newborns with total low obstruction should have a contrast material enema examination, those with full high obstruction often do not need further radiologic screening after radiography. Since each incidence of partial intestinal blockage requires a particular course of treatment, all patients with this condition must have an upper gastrointestinal series. Ultrasonography (US) can distinguish between colonic and small bowel blockage in cases of low intestinal obstruction. Furthermore, US is helpful in the accurate detection of intestinal duplication cysts as well as meconium ileus and meconium peritonitis (12).

Conclusion

The management of long gap intestinal atresia continues to pose challenges. In the present case, the patient was suspected to have an intestinal obstruction upon initial examination and subsequently underwent an exploratory laparotomy. However, intraoperative findings revealed a grossly dilated proximal jejunal loop, and the next segment of the intestine was a narrow ascending colon. Surgeons need to understand positional variations and congenital anomalies, as well as the procedures needed to identify these abnormalities during surgery.

References

1.
Shorter NA, Georges A, Perenyi A, Garrow E. A proposed classification system for familial intestinal atresia and its relevance to the understanding of the etiology of jejunoileal atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:18225. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Grosfeld JL, Ballantine TV, Shoemaker R. Operative management of intestinal atresia and stenosis based on pathological findings. J Pediatr Surg. 1979;14:368 75. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
King A, Heyman MB. Intestinal atresia. Uptodate. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/intestinal-atresia. Last accessed as on 27-11-2023.
4.
Javid PJ, Kim HB, Duggan CP, Jaksic T. Serial transverse enteroplasty is associated with successful shortterm outcomes in infants with short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:101923. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Tripathy PK, Ray BK, Mohanty HK. Congenital absence of jejunum and ileum: A case report and literature review. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2017;14(3):53-55. Doi: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_63_16. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Khanna K, Yadav DK, Nandan R, Goel P, Rao PS. Congenital colonic stenosis with absent caecum and appendix: A rare association. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018:bcr-2018. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Salim A, Moazzam Z, Ashraf A, Dogar SA, Qazi SH. Congenital absence of the appendix in a child with malrotation. J Pediatr Sur Case Rep 2020;60:101530. [crossref]
8.
Sham M, Singh D. Near total jejunoileal atresia: A management challenge. J Clin Neonatol. 2013;2:1035. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Thomas WJTL. Complete absence of jejunum, ileum, and the greater part of the colon. Lancet. 1884;123(3150):63. [crossref]
10.
Besner GE, Bates GD, Boesel CP, Singh V, Welty SE, Corpron CA. Total absence of the small bowel in a premature neonate. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005;21(5):396-99. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Louw JH, Barnard CN. Congenital intestinal atresia; Observations on its origin. Lancet. 1955;269:1065 67. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Berrocal T, Lamas M, Gutiérrez J, Torres I, Prieto C, del Hoyo ML. Congenital anomalies of the small intestine, colon, and rectum. Radiographics. 1999;19(5):1219-36.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/66939.19361

Date of Submission: Aug 14, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Nov 08, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 13, 2024
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 16, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jan 05, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jan 10, 2024 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com