Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 20054

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : BC01 - BC04 Full Version

Evaluation of Serum ApoA1 and ApoB Levels in the First-degree Relatives of Patients with Essential Hypertension at a Tertiary Care Centre in Eastern India: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73288.20268
Bandana Thakur, Pooja Priyadarsini, Sarada Asis Dash, Sangeeta Sanghamitra Bhanja, Subhashree Ray, Sarthak Ranjan Nayak, Rajlaxmi Tiwari, Prachi Jena

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, PRM and MCH, Baripada, Odisha, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 6. Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, IMS and SUM Hospital Campus 2 Phulnakhara, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 7. Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, IMS and SUM Hospital Campus 2 Phulnakhara, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 8. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, IMS and SUM Hospital Campus 2 Phulnakhara, Cuttack, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Rajlaxmi Tiwari,
D-703, Shree Khetra Greenwood, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar-751019, Odisha, India.
E-mail: rajlaxmitiwari@soa.ac.in

Abstract

Introduction: An altered serum lipid profile and lipoprotein levels are major modifiable risk factors for hypertension. Apolipoprotein A1 and B100 (ApoA1 and ApoB100) are the chief structural proteins of High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) and Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), respectively. The level of ApoB in the serum represents overall atherogenicity, whereas the level of ApoA1 can indicate total antiatherogenicity.

Aim: To evaluate the serum levels of ApoA1 and ApoB in the first-degree relatives of individuals with essential hypertension.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Clinical Biochemistry laboratory in association with the Department of General Medicine at SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India, from February 2018 to March 2019. It consisted of 165 participants: group I included hypertensive patients (n=55); group II included first-degree relatives of the above hypertensive patients (n=55); and group III included non hypertensive healthy age-matched controls (n=55). The waist-hip ratio, Blood Pressure (BP), fasting plasma glucose, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, LDL-C, ApoA1, ApoB, and the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio were all measured. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25.0.

Results: The mean age of subjects in groups I, II, and III was 49±8.3, 38±5.2, and 37±5.4 years, respectively, with males constituting 56% and females 44% of the total participants. The ApoA1 levels were lowest in group I (104.9±16.3 mg/dL) and highest in group III (117.4±7.3 mg/dL). The serum ApoB levels and the ratio of ApoB/ApoA1 were highest in group I (104.2±14.1; 1.1±0.64 mg/dL) and lowest in group III (60.9±18.2; 0.5±0.15 mg/dL). A highly significant negative correlation (r=-0.40, p<0.01) was found between Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and ApoA1. A significant correlation (r=0.26, p=0.04) was observed between SBP and the ApoB/ApoA1 ratio in group III.

Conclusion: Serum ApoB levels and the ratio of ApoB/ApoA1 were significantly elevated in the first-degree relatives of hypertensive patients, thus emphasising the importance of screening individuals with a positive family history of hypertension.

Keywords

Apolipoproteins, Atherogenicity, Diastolic blood pressure, Dyslipidemia, Family history, Siblings

Hypertension is a leading global non communicable disease, affecting approximately 1.3 billion people and resulting in about 10 million annual deaths (1). Essential hypertension is defined as a Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) of ≥140 mm Hg and a Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) of ≥90 mm Hg, irrespective of medication (2). In India, the prevalence of hypertension is nearly 33% in urban areas and 25% in rural areas (3). Family history plays a vital role in the development of hypertension (4). The risk of essential hypertension in childhood increases considerably if, both parents are hypertensive. The genetic heritability of hypertension can be accounted for at 15-40%. Screening healthy individuals with a positive family history of hypertension helps to develop insights into the familial nature of hypertension (5),(6).

Altered serum lipid profiles and lipoprotein levels are significant modifiable risk factors for essential hypertension. Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and other metabolic disruptions in an individual can act synergistically to accelerate atherosclerosis and the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases (7).

Apolipoprotein B 100 (ApoB) is the major apoprotein of atherogenic LDL-C. LDL-C contains variable amounts of cholesterol but has only one ApoB. Therefore, ApoB reflects the number of LDL particles better than LDL-C (8). ApoB is a superior predictor of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) compared to total blood cholesterol and triglyceride levels (4). Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) is the chief structural protein of antiatherogenic HDL-C. It plays an essential role in reverse cholesterol transport and cellular cholesterol balance. It is isolated as a prostacyclin-stabilising factor and thus may have anticlotting actions (9).

The ApoB level in serum represents gross atherogenicity, whereas the ApoA1 level can represent total antiatherogenicity (10). Frank PG and Marcel YL, in a review, stated that the diffusional and translocational efflux of cholesterol from cells is better explained by the ApoA1 structure, and hence, its measurement is a better predictor of atherosclerotic potential than HDL (9). Lima LM et al., suggested that measuring ApoA has a methodological advantage over quantifying LDL-C and non-HDL-C, as these parameters are usually calculated using different formulas, while ApoA is analysed using internationally standardised methods (10). Numerous studies have revealed that ApoB is a more potent indicator of cardiovascular risk than LDL-C and non-HDL-C (11). In a discordance analysis for cardiovascular risk assessment, Yun YM concluded that ApoB is superior to LDL-C levels (12).

A literature search revealed that the evaluation of serum ApoA1 and ApoB levels in the first-degree relatives of patients with essential hypertension has not yet been studied in India. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the serum ApoA1 and ApoB levels in the first-degree relatives of individuals with essential hypertension.

Material and Methods

The present cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Clinical Biochemistry labouratory in association with the Department of General Medicine at SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India, from February 2018 to March 2019, after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC 149/2018). The subjects were recruited for the study after obtaining their written informed consent.

Inclusion criteria: Patients aged 25-55 years diagnosed with essential hypertension according to Joint National Committee (JNC) 8 criteria (2), as well as first-degree relatives (parent, child, or sibling) of the aforementioned hypertensive patients who are not known cases of essential hypertension, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, renal disease, or endocrinopathy were excluded. Pregnant females, patients on treatment with immunosuppressants, and those taking drugs that induce the development of hypertension were also excluded. In the control group, subjects with a family history of hypertension, renal diseases, chronic metabolic diseases, and patients unwilling to participate in the study were excluded.

Sample size calculation: A convenient sampling method was adopted as present study was initiated as a small-scale investigation. Hypertensive patients visiting the Medicine Outpatient Department (OPD) were asked to include their first-degree relatives in the study. The final sample consisted of 165 participants, divided into three groups as follows:

Group I (n=55): Hypertensive patients;
Group II (n=55): First-degree relatives of the above hypertensive patients;
Group III (n=55): Non hypertensive healthy age-matched controls;

Study Procedure

Waist and hip circumferences were measured using the criteria established by the World Health Organisation, and the waist-hip ratio was calculated (13). Blood pressure was measured after allowing the subjects to relax for five minutes in a sitting position, with the BP apparatus kept at heart level. Two readings were taken one minute apart; if the readings differed significantly, a third reading was taken. The lower of the two readings was used to indicate BP (SBP and DBP).

Analysis of biochemical parameters: A 5 mL sample of venous blood was collected under aseptic precautions for biochemical analysis. Serum cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL-C, and fasting plasma glucose were analysed using the Toshiba 120 FR fully automated chemistry analyser. The LDL-C level was calculated using Friedewald’s formula. Serum levels of ApoA1 and ApoB100 were analysed using the Automated Clinical analyser Biolis 24i Premium (Tokyo Boeki Machinery Ltd.). Internal quality control for the above parameters, procured from Agappe Diagnostics, was performed daily, and the monthly Coefficient of Variation (CV%) was satisfactory (Table/Fig 1) (14),(15).

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0. The distribution of the data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. An inter group comparison of the variables was conducted using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Independent t-tests. Correlation analysis was performed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The collected data were subjected to the Shapiro-Wilk test and were found to have a continuous distribution. The mean age of subjects in groups I, II, and III was 49±8.3, 38±5.2, and 37±5.4 years, respectively. The gender distribution (male/female) in groups I, II, and III was 33/22, 39/16, and 25/30, respectively. The waist-hip ratio was higher in group I (1±0.03) compared to group II (0.9±0.04) and group III (0.9±0.04). The ApoA1 levels were lowest (104.9±16.3 mg/dL) in group I and highest (117.4±7.0 mg/dL) in group III. The serum ApoB levels and the ratio of ApoB/A1 were highest (104.2±14.1; 1.1±0.64 mg/dL) in group I and lowest (60.9±18.2; 0.5±0.15 mg/dL) in group III. An independent samples t-test was applied between groups I and II, and significant differences (p-value <0.01) in the lipid profile and serum levels of ApoA1 and ApoB were observed, as expected in the non hypertensive group. When groups II and III were compared (Table/Fig 2), significant differences were found in DBP (p=0.03), ApoB (p-value=0.01), and the ApoB/A1 ratio (p-value<0.01), thus emphasising the importance of ApoB as an indicator of dyslipidaemia, even when the difference in serum LDL-C levels is not significant (Table/Fig 2).

There was a negative and non significant correlation (r-value=-0.12, p-value=0.4) between the ratio of ApoB/ApoA1 and SBP in group I. A similar negative correlation (r-value=-0.03, p-value=0.8) was observed between the ratio of ApoB/ApoA1 and DBP in group I (Table/Fig 3).

In contrast, a highly significant negative correlation (r-value=-0.40, p-value <0.01) was found between SBP and ApoA1. Additionally, a significant positive correlation (r-value=0.26, p-value=0.04) was observed between SBP and the ratio of ApoB/ApoA1 in group II (Table/Fig 4). A significant negative correlation (r-value=-0.32, p-value= 0.02) was also noted between SBP and ApoA1. However, the correlation between the ratio of ApoB/ApoA1 and SBP and DBP was not significant (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The familial nature of hypertension has been explored in various studies, highlighting the importance of screening individuals with a positive history of essential hypertension to narrow the search for the disease. Some families may have essential hypertension spanning generations, which increases the likelihood of hypertension in their descendants (4),(16). The present study showed that BP among patients with essential hypertension (group I) was significantly higher than that of their first-degree relatives (group II). DBP was significantly higher and differed significantly between the controls and group II. This finding correlates with studies that have concluded that higher DBP is associated with a greater risk of future development of hypertension in adults under 50 years of age, and it should not be overlooked, as both DBP and SBP can independently predict cardiovascular risk (17),(18).

The lipid profiles of group I were significantly higher than those of group II. Dyslipidaemia is strongly associated with the development of hypertension; both conditions share similar pathophysiological mechanisms related to endothelial dysfunction and are independently associated with an increased cardiovascular risk (19). The difference in lipid profiles between group II and the control group was not statistically significant.

The ApoA1 levels were significantly lower in hypertensive patients compared to their first-degree relatives and the control subjects. There was a highly significant negative correlation between ApoA1 and SBP. The ApoA1 levels in serum correlate strongly with HDL-C. In addition to its antiatherogenic properties, ApoA1 exhibits endothelium-stabilising properties. In a health survey by Forvall G et al., in Uppsala, Sweden, ApoA1 strongly predicted CVD and its associated mortality. Some research groups are focused on increasing the ApoA1 fraction and HDL using ApoA1 peptides and mimetics (20). A study in China also concluded that high serum ApoA1 could lower the likelihood of developing essential hypertension in patients with coronary artery disease (21).

The serum ApoB levels were significantly higher in hypertensive patients than in group II and the control subjects. The first-degree relatives of the patients had substantially higher levels of ApoB compared to controls, thereby predisposing them to a higher risk of developing hypertension. A longitudinal study conducted on American Japanese subjects over a period of 10 years suggested that individuals who developed hypertension during the study had elevated serum ApoB levels. The retention of lipids containing ApoB in the arterial wall can interact with subendothelial proteoglycans and initiate a series of inflammatory events, eventually leading to atherosclerosis and, subsequently, hypertension (22). A systematic review by Nathir I et al., stated that an increase in serum ApoB concentration in hypertensive individuals exacerbates the risk of cardiovascular events (23).

Authors found that the ratio of ApoB/ApoA1 was significantly higher among the three groups for obvious reasons. This ratio was significantly elevated in the first-degree relatives compared to controls, emphasising its role as a predictor of hypertension in subjects with a positive family history. Additionally, we found a positive and significant correlation between ApoB/ApoA1 and SBP. This ratio is a better predictor of Coronary Artery Disease than conventional lipid particles and lipid ratios, as it signifies the balance between proatherogenicity and antiatherogenicity (22).

Limitation(s)

This study was limited by a small sample size. The hypertensive participants could have been stratified into groups based on their blood pressure levels. Additionally, the first-degree relatives were not monitored for the future development of hypertension.

Conclusion

The present study concludes that ApoA1, ApoB, and the ApoB/ApoA1 ratios are significantly higher in individuals with hypertension. The first-degree relatives were found to have a higher DBP compared to control subjects, thus emphasising the need for screening individuals with a positive family history of hypertension. Serum ApoB levels and the ratio of ApoB/ApoA1 were significantly elevated in the first-degree relatives. These parameters correlated significantly with SBP compared to conventional lipid profiles. The ApoB/ApoA1 ratio may be more instrumental than the individual apolipoprotein levels in identifying hypertension within families. Future longitudinal studies with a larger sample size should be conducted to investigate the inheritance patterns of essential hypertension.

References

1.
World Heart Report 2023: Confronting the World’s Number One Killer. Geneva, Switzerland. World Heart Federation. 2023.
2.
Armstrong C; Joint National Committee. JNC8 guidelines for the management of hypertension in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2014;90(7):503-04.
3.
Gupta R, Xavier D. Hypertension: The most critical non communicable disease risk factor in India. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(4):565-72. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Landazuri P, Loango N, Gallego M. Cardiovascular risk factors in first-degree relatives of patients with hypertension. Colomb Med. 2011;42(1):17-25. [crossref]
5.
Gupta-Malhotra M, Hashmi SS, Barratt MS, Milewicz DM, Shete S. Familial aggregation of first-degree relatives of children with essential hypertension. Blood Press. 2018;27(5):289-96. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Hanna R. Hypertension is a genetic condition- A quantum dilemma. J Hum Hypertens. 2024;38(3):289-92. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Tamang HK, Timilsina U, Singh KP, Shrestha S, Raman RK, Panta P, et al. Apo B/Apo A-I ratio is statistically a better predictor of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) than conventional lipid profile: A study from Kathmandu valley, Nepal. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(2):34-36. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Sniderman AD, Williams K, Contois JH, Monroe HM, McQueen MJ, de Graaf J, et al. A meta-analysis of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B as markers of cardiovascular risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(3):337-45. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Frank PG, Marcel YL. Apolipoprotein A-I: Structure-function relationships. J Lipid Res. 2000;41(6):853-72. [crossref]
10.
Lima LM, Carvalho MdG, Sousa MO. Apo B/apo A-I ratio and cardiovascular risk prediction. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007;88(6):e187-90. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Walldius G. Apolipoprotein B (apoB) more closely related to subclinical atherosclerosis than non-HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol. J Intern Med. 2010;268(6):549-51. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Yun YM. Apolipoprotein B, Non-HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol as markers for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment. Ann Lab Med. 2023;43(3):221-22. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Jaeschke L, Steinbrecher A, Pischon T. Measurement of waist and hip circumference with a body surface scanner: Feasibility, validity, reliability, and correlations with markers of the metabolic syndrome. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119430. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Adeli K, Ceriotti F, Higgins V. Reference Information for the Clinical Laboratory. In: Rifai N, Horvath AR, Wittwer CT, editors. Teitz Fundamentals of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. 8th ed. India: Elsevier Inc;2019. p 988-1028.
15.
Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the Third Report of The National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486-97. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Kanchan KC, Katwal S, Yadav GK, Adhikari A, Thapa RK. Jha SKM, et al. Family history of hypertension and its relation to other variables in hypertensive patients: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital. International Journal of Surgery: Global Health. 2023;6(5):e0235. [crossref]
17.
Kanegae H, Oikawa T, Okawara Y, Hoshide S, Kario K. Which blood pressure measurement, systolic or diastolic, better predicts future hypertension in normotensive young adults? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017;19(6):603-10. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Flint AC, Conell C, Ren X, Banki NM, Chan SL, Rao VA, et al. Effect of systolic and diastolic blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(3):243-51. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Chen S, Cheng W. Relationship between lipid profiles and hypertension: A cross-sectional study of 62,957 Chinese adult males. Front Public Health. 2022;10:895499. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Florvall G, Basu S, Larsson A. Apolipoprotein A1 is a stronger prognostic marker than HDL and LDL cholesterol for cardiovascular disease and mortality in elderly men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(12):1262-66. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Dong H, Zhang Y, Hu P, Wang J, Lu N. Serum apolipoprotein A1 rather than apolipoprotein B is associated with hypertension prevalence in Chinese people with coronary artery disease. Blood Press Monit. 2022;27(2):121-27. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Han SJ, Fujimoto WY, Kahn SE, Leonetti DL, Boyko EJ. Apolipoprotein B Levels Predict Future Development of Hypertension Independent of Visceral Adiposity and Insulin Sensitivity. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020;35(2):351-58. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Nathir I, Abd Aziz F, Hashim R. Association between Apolipoprotein B and coronary artery disease among hypertensive patients: A systematic review of the prospective and retrospective studies. Cureus. 2023;15(12):e49854.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73288.20268

Date of Submission: Jun 05, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Jul 10, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Aug 29, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 05, 2024
• Manual Googling: Jul 12, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Aug 28, 2024 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com