Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 16799

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : CC01 - CC05 Full Version

Spirometric Evaluation among Individuals Working in Stone Chip Crushing Factories: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/73685.20299
Sujoy Mukherjee, Parthasarathy Sinha, Debalina Sengupta, Sanhita Mukherjee

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Rampurhat Government Medical College and Hospital, Rampurhat, West Bengal, India. 2. Senior Resident, Department of Physiology, Rampurhat Government Medical College and Hospital, Rampurhat, West Bengal, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, Rampurhat Government Medical College and Hospital, Rampurhat, West Bengal, India. 4. Professor, Department of Physiology, Rampurhat Government Medical College and Hospital, Rampurhat, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Parthasarathy Sinha,
185, Baburbag (Near Primary School), PO- Rajbati, P.S.- Burdwan Sadar, District-Purba Bardhaman, Burdwan-713104, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: panbond09@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Silicosis is still one of the most serious occupational health diseases in the world because of its potential to cause physical impairment. It is a progressive and debilitating occupational lung disease that primarily affects workers in the manufacturing, construction and mining industries. Silicosis is mostly caused by inhaling crystalline silica dust. Still, a substantial study on the lung health of stone quarry workers in Western Part of Bengal are still lacking.

Aim: To determine the alterations in pulmonary function status (by spirometry) and evaluate the gender differences in pulmonary mechanics among workers affected by occupational silica dust.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted for a duration of three months to analyse the spirometric changes in lung function among 62 workers exposed to occupational silica dust, aged 18 to 60 years (both genders), attending the Department of Physiology at Rampurhat Government Medical College, West Bengal, India. After obtaining anthropometric measurements, including height and weight of the subjects, spirometry was carried out on each patient according to the recommendations of American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) (2005). Patients were grouped into categories of normal, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), restrictive pattern, mixed ventilatory defect, and Small Airflow Obstruction (SAO) based on spirometric values of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, Forced mid-Expiratory Flow (FEF25%-75%), and Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) values. Analysis was performed using GraphPad QuickCalcs software using Chi-square test and Unpaired t-test.

Results: The mean age of the subjects was 49.6 years, with 51 (82.26%) males and 11 (17.74%) females among the 62 study subjects. There were 36 (58.06%) smokers and 26 (41.94%) non smokers. The average Body Mass Index (BMI) of the study subjects was 17.268±2.501 kg/m2 (underweight category). A significant reduction in spirometric variables was observed below the lower normal limit of percent predicted, including FVC (80-120%), FEV1 (80-120%), PEFR (>60% predicted value for men; up to 100 L/min lower than predicted for males, and 85 L/min for females), FEF25%-75% (50%-60% and up to 130% of the average), and Forced Expiratory Time (FET) (6 secs), except for the FEV1/FVC ratio (70-85%), which was higher than the normal limit. The majority of the study subjects belonged to the mixed ventilatory defect category, comprising 36 subjects (58.06%), 17 (27.42%) had a Restrictive Spirometric Pattern (RSP), while the remaining 9 subjects (14.52%) were classified as normal.

Conclusion: Detectable spirometric changes have been observed among stone quarry workers, revealing not only restrictive patterns but also mixed ventilatory defects. Necessary preventive and interventional measures should be taken at an early phase to prevent further progression of lung impairment in such a population.

Keywords

Lung function test, Occupational silica dust, Mixed ventilatory defect

Inhaling crystalline silica dust is the primary cause of silicosis, a progressive and crippling occupational lung disease that mostly affects those working in the manufacturing, construction, and mining sectors. Exposure to silica causes a series of inflammatory reactions in the lungs, resulting in the deposition of fibrous tissue and irreparable harm to the respiratory system. Silicosis is presently the most common chronic occupational illness in the world, and the burden of silica-associated diseases is significant (1).

Considering its propensity to result in physical impairment, silicosis remains one of the world’s most significant occupational health disorders. In India, the incidence of silicosis varies greatly, it can vary from 3.5% in ordnance factories to 54.6% in the slate-pencil sector (2), but only few epidemiological studies have been done so far on this disease (3). Increasing age, the duration of exposure to dust, smoking status, and the existence of chronic obstructive lung disease are all strongly correlated with the severity of pulmonary function impairment in radiological analyses (4). Patients suffering from pulmonary fibrosis due to chronic silica dust exposure typically experience profound respiratory impairment, leading to reduced lung function, higher pulmonary resistance, and decreased perfusion capacity (5). Regular assessment of lung functions would serve as a basis for identifying lung abnormalities in the early stages of the disease, as deterioration in pulmonary function typically becomes apparent only in the later stages when a significant portion of lung tissue has been destroyed (6). Preventing and controlling this fatal but avoidable disease is plagued with challenges, including an uncontrolled informal sector, diagnostic hurdles, lack of monitoring, insufficient personnel, and low awareness (7).

Spirometry is a method for evaluating lung function that involves measuring the amount of air an individual can evacuate from the lungs following a maximum inspiration (8). Pulmonary function tests have ushered in a new era of scientific approaches to the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of pulmonary disorders by enabling the early detection of changes in pneumoconiosis workers who are constantly exposed to silica dust, as well as the implementation of protective and preventive measures to reduce the hazards of exposure to polluted environments (9). There are several stone quarries and mining businesses in the western region of Bengal; however, compared to the rest of India, very few research has been done among these workers. This lack of research may make it more difficult to identify and prevent lung damage in these workers in the early stages. Silicosis is a significant issue in West Bengal, particularly among stone-crushing and quarrying workers in the Birbhum area. The “West Bengal Silicosis Control Programme” was designed as a state effort in July 2012 and was piloted in Birbhum, West Bengal, India (10).

The primary objective of this study was to determine the alterations in pulmonary function status (by spirometry) and to evaluate the gender differences in pulmonary mechanics among occupationally silica dust-affected workers.

Material and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Physiology, Rampurhat Government Medical College, West Bengal, India, from April to June 2024. Institutional Ethical Clearance (IEC) was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Rampurhat Government Medical College (Memo No. RPHGMCH/STAC/67 dated 01.03.2024).

Inclusion criteria: Clinically stable patients, including males and females aged 30-60 years, with history of working in stone crusher units for more than five years and have been exposed to occupational silica dust, and who attended the Department of Physiology after being referred from the Pulmonology Department for spirometric evaluation of their lung function were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with acute Lower Respiratory Symptoms (LRS), patients attending for preanaesthetic check-ups, patients suspected of having active pulmonary tuberculosis, those with haemoptysis, patients with known cardiovascular, subdiaphragmatic or otorhinolaryngological diseases and female patients having active menstrual bleeding were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation:

Calculated using the formula:

S=Z2×P×(1-P)/M2

Where,

S=sample size
Z=Z score (here 1.960 based on a confidence level of 95%)
P=population proportion (here 0.2, taking the prevalence of silicosis to be 20%) (11)
M=margin of error (10%)

So, the sample size comes to 62.

Study Procedure

Anthropometric measurements of the patients, including weight and height, were measured using a weighing machine and a stadiometer, respectively. Furthermore, BMI was calculated using the weight and height values:

BMI=Weight (in kg) / Height2 (in meters) (12).

The patients were clearly instructed regarding the spirometric technique. The room temperature was set at 27°C, and the patients were seated during the procedure.

Spirometry was performed using an electronic spirometer (RMS HELIOS 702) that was preprogrammed with the current recommendations from the ATS and the ERS (2005), with an 80% ethnic adjustment. Before the procedure, the spirometer was thoroughly checked for any damage or leakage. During the research, the spirometer was calibrated daily using a calibrated syringe, following the most recent ATS/ERS recommendations (13).

The largest observed values of FEV1 and FVC obtained from at least three acceptable and reproducible tests were considered during the final interpretation of the results.

The normal limits of the data are taken as follows: FVC (80-120%) (14), FEV1 (80-120%) (14), PEFR (>60% predicted value for men, with readings up to 100 L/min lower than predicted; for women, the 2equivalent figure is 85 L/min) (15), FEF25-75% (50%-60% and up to 130% of the average) (16), FET (6 seconds) (17), and FEV1/FVC ratio (70-85%) (18).

After the completion of spirometry, all the patients were categorised as per existing standard criteria based on FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25%-75%, and PEFR values, with interpretation of RSP and SAO done based on the aforementioned reference limits:

• Normal (14),(18);
• Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (including mild/moderate/severe/very severe): FEV1/FVC <70% and FEV1 value <100% of predicted (19);
• Restrictive Spirometric Pattern (RSP): FVC <80%, FEV1 ≤80% (normal/decreased), and FEV1/FVC ≥0.7 (normal/increased) (19);
• Mixed Ventilatory Defect: FEV1/FVC <0.7 and FVC <80% of predicted (20);
• Small Airflow Obstruction (SAO): FEF25%-75% <50% of predicted (21),(22).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test with Microsoft Excel and GraphPad QuickCalcs software, California, USA. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Furthermore, gender variance analysis was evaluated using the Unpaired t-test.

Results

FET was noted to be significantly higher in male subjects. The BMI of the study population was observed to be 17.337±2.482 for males and 16.949±2.691 for females, which falls under the underweight category. Furthermore, the spirometric values were observed to be lower than the Lower Limit of Normal (LLN), except for the FEV1/FVC ratio, which was higher (105.27±11.69 in males and 112.73±9.12 in females) (Table/Fig 1).

It was observed that the majority of these subjects belonged to the mixed ventilatory defects (RSP+SAO) (58.06%) and RSP (27.42%) categories (Table/Fig 2).

Most of the study subjects were males (82.26%) and that the percentage of smokers was predominantly males (58.06%) (Table/Fig 3)a.

Chi-square analysis without Yates correction was conducted. The Chi-squared value equals 18.516 with 1 degree of freedom. The association between rows (gender variance) and columns (smoking habits) is statistically extremely significant, which shows predominance of smokers among males (Table/Fig 3)b.

It was observed that there was no significant difference between the spirometric patterns of RSP, RSP+SAO and normal patterns between smokers and non smokers (Table/Fig 4).

The association between RSP+SAO and normal pattern in smokers and non smokers was statistically not significant. The association between RSP and Normal pattern in smokers and non smokers was statistically not significant. The association between RSP+SAO and RSP pattern in smokers and non smokers was statistically not significant (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The present study focuses on the various respiratory involvement patterns in individuals who have been exposed to occupational silica dust. The spirometric values in the present study, including FVC, FEV1, PEFR, FEF25-75, and FET, were all below the lower normal limits for percent predicted as well as absolute values, except for the FEV1/FVC ratio, which was higher than the normal limits. Similar findings were obtained in a study by Wardyn PM et al., which reported that exposure to crystalline silica dust significantly affected respiratory function, resulting in bronchial and small airway blockage and the prevalence of compromised FEV1/FVC and FEF25-75 increased with cumulative silica exposure for three years or more (23). The reduction in lung function can be affected by the duration of exposure to occupational silica dust, as several studies have shown a progressive deterioration of lung function parameters with an increase in the duration of exposure, particularly in those exposed for more than 10 years (24),(25),(26).

Another significant finding of the present study was that the majority of the study population were in underweight category. The poor nutritional status of the silicotic patients, which was evident by their underweight status, is corroborated by numerous studies, including one by Chowdhury N et al., among agate workers in Gujarat, and another by Madahaban P and Raj S in Rajasthan (27),(28). The study by Chowdhury N et al., also reported that malnutrition is linked to higher fatality rates in silicosis sufferers (27). A study among pneumoconiosis patients by Peng Y et al., reported a higher incidence of obstructive disease among underweight age groups (29). In sharp contrast to the results mentioned above, one study found that the majority of silicotic patients were overweight and obese (30), while one study found no significant correlation between the weight of the patients and silicotic severity of silicosis (31).

The findings of the current study indicate that the majority of the participants had RSP and that many of them had mixed ventilatory abnormalities. Similar data were obtained by a study conducted on 85 female quartz workers by Tiwari RR and Sharma YK which showed that exposure to free silica dust caused obstructive, restrictive, and combined (both obstructive and restrictive) patterns in lung function on spirometry, and that respiratory morbidity was strongly associated with the duration of exposure (32). Individuals with advanced simple silicosis (International Labour Organisation Category 3) were more likely to have a restrictive abnormal pattern on spirometry, whereas those with progressive massive fibrosis were more likely to have both obstructive and restrictive findings on spirometric tests (33).

A plausible explanation for the elevated occurrence of mixed defects in silicotics might be the involvement of the airways due to pulmonary fibrosis (34). Silicosis involves the interaction between silica particles and alveolar macrophages, leading to an inflammatory cascade and subsequent pulmonary fibrosis (1). Pulmonary fibrosis is not only a clinical cause of restrictive lung abnormalities in fibrotic lung illnesses such as silicosis, but it can also result in airway distortion, which can induce airway obstruction (35). The restrictive or mixed pattern in spirometry seen in advanced cases of silicosis (36) carries an overall higher risk of mortality compared to normal persons as shown in a study by Yang S et al., and hence calls for early diagnosis and intervention in such cases (34).

Male predominance concerning susceptibility to silicosis and smoking habits is evident from the results of the present research, which was similar to the findings of studies by Rajavel S et al., among workers in sandstone mines in Rajasthan (2) and by Tiwari RR et al., among quartz stone ex-workers in Gujarat (6). Although differences in respiratory involvement may not be significantly different between male and female counterparts, gender bias may lead to delayed diagnosis in female workers, as shown in a study by Kerget B et al., (37).

The restrictive, obstructive, or mixed patterns of lung pathologies were not found to be statistically significant between smokers and non smokers in the current study. There is ongoing debate regarding smoking’s relationship to silicosis. In past research, smoking was thought to be a risk factor for silicosis (38); however, other investigations found no meaningful correlation between smoking status and silicosis (39). Smoking can indeed affect lung function parameters like Diffusing Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) and increase FET, as shown in the study by Sill J (40). On the other hand, in smokers, there was a statistically significant correlation between the amount of emphysema and silica dust, indicating that smoking tobacco increases silica dust’s possibly hazardous effects of silica dust (41).

In this study, the authors found that notable changes in lung parameters occur in individuals exposed to silica dust for prolonged periods, which can be easily diagnosed by simple spirometry. So, special emphasis is to be given on the detection of lung damage so that early precautionary measures can be taken in workers of stone quarries, whose health is generally neglected.

Limitation(s)

There are few limitations of the present study that need to be considered:

1) The patients’ clinical profiles, including histories of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, and the use of bronchodilators, steroids, and antihistamines, were not obtained, which could be a potential source of confounding factors.
2) Smoking has been observed to be a confounding factor in the present study.
3) Studies with a larger population and variable durations of exposure is needed to expand the validity of the findings.
4) Gender wise homogeneity among the study population was not maintained.
5) Apart from doing the spirometric study, no other tests have been conducted to establish restrictive lung disease among stone quarry workers.

Conclusion

Detectable spirometric changes have been observed among stone quarry workers, where not only restrictive patterns but also mixed ventilatory defects were seen. Necessary preventive and interventional measures should be taken at an early phase to prevent further progression of lung impairment in such population.

Author’s contribution: SM: Conception and design, analysis, interpretation; PS: Acquisition of data and drafting of article; DS: Revising it critically for important intellectual content; SM: Final approval of the version.

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to all the faculty members and personnel at the Rampurhat Government Medical College in Rampurhat, West Bengal, India, specifically for giving them an opportunity to carry out this research. Also, they would like to express their gratitude to the research participants for their invaluable consent and participation. Lastly, authors would especially want to thank the Principal of Rampurhat Government Medical College and Hospital for her unwavering support and guidance during the research process.

References

1.
Hoy RF, Chambers DC. Silica-related diseases in the modern world. Allergy. 2020;75(11):2805-17. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Rajavel S, Raghav P, Gupta MK, Muralidhar V. Silico-tuberculosis, silicosis and other respiratory morbidities among sandstone mine workers in Rajasthan-A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0230574. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Chaudhuri S, Jaison MK, Chattopadhyay B, Paul KK, Sengupta T. Pattern of occupational lung disease among industrial workers attending a medical college of Eastern India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2024;13(8):3252-56. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Ghotkar VB, Maldhure BR, Zodpey SP. Involvement of lung and lung function tests in stone quarry workers. Ind J Tub. 1995;42:155-60.
5.
Champlin J, Edwards R, Pipavath S. Imaging of occupational lung disease. Radiologic Clinics. 2016;54(6):1077-96. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Tiwari RR, Narain R, Patel BD, Makwana IS, Saiyed HN. Spirometric measurements among quartz stone ex-workers of Gujarat, India. J Occup Health. 2003;45(2):88-93. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Rupani MP. Challenges and opportunities for silicosis prevention and control: Need for a national health program on silicosis in India. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2023;18(1):11. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Liou TG, Kanner RE. Spirometry. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2009;37:137-52.[crossref][PubMed]
9.
Austin EK, James C, Tessier J. Early detection methods for silicosis in Australia and internationally: A review of the literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15):8123. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Mitra S, Basu M, Paul BK, Maji D, Dey KK, Chakraborty D. Prevalence of x-ray positive silicosis cases among workers in a stone crushing factory: A clinic-based retrospective cohort study. Int J Preventive and Public Health Sci. 2015;1(3):21-24.
11.
Gupta SP, Bajaj A, Jain AL, Vasudeva YL. Clinical and radiological studies in silicosis: Based on a study of the disease amongst stonecutters. Indian J Med Res. 1972;60(9):1309-05.
12.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. Health implications of obesity: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:147-51; Ann Intern Med. 1985;103(Suppl 6, Part 2): 1073-77. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Miller MR, Hankinson JA, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Euro Respir Soc. 2005;26(2):319-38. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Salzman SH. Pulmonary Function Testing: Tips on how to interpret the results. J Resp Dis. 1999;20:812.
15.
Nunn AJ, Gregg I. New regression equations for predicting peak expiratory flow in adults. Br Med J. 1989;298(6680):1068-70. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Lungfunktion, 2010. Practice compendium for semester 6. Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
17.
Kainu A, Lindqvist A, Sarna S, Sovijärvi A. Spirometric and anthropometric determinants of forced expiratory time in a general population. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2008;28(1):38-42. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Carey WD, Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Current Clinical Medicine: Online + Print. 2nd ed. Philladelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010.
19.
Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Buist SA, Calverley P, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(6):532-55. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Boros P, Franczuk M, Wesolowski S. “Mixed’’ changes in spirometry-verification of the pattern of lung function impairment. Pneumologia I Alergologia Polska. 2003;71(11-12):527- 21.
21.
Simon MR, Chinchilli VM, Phillips BR, Sorkness CA, Lemanske Jr RF, Szefler SJ, et al. Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity and FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio in relation to clinical and physiological parameters in asthmatic children with normal FEV1 values. J Aller Clin Immunol. 2010;126(3):527-34. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Ciprandi G, Cirillo I. Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity may be a marker of bronchial impairment in allergic rhinitis. J Aller Clin Immunol. 2011;127(2):549. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Wardyn PM, Edme JL, de Broucker V, Cherot-Kornobis N, Ringeval D, Amouyel P, et al. The impact of occupational exposure to crystalline silica dust on respiratory function (airway obstruction and FEF25-75) in the French general population. Environmental Research. 2023;222:115382. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Rathod SB, Sorte SR. Effect of duration of exposure to silica dust on lung function impairment in stone crusher workers of Marathwada region. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2013;5(4):121.
25.
Wang X, Yano E, Nonaka K, Wang M, Wang Z. Respiratory impairments due to dust exposure: A comparative study among workers exposed to silica, asbestos, and coalmine dust. Am J Indust Med. 1997;31(5):495-502. 3.0.CO;2-T>[crossref]
26.
Sheikh JA, Khan ZA, Khan T, Chowdhary S. Pulmonary function among stone quarry workers in India: The effect of duration of exposure, smoking status and job profile on pulmonary function tests. J Health Soc Sci. 2018;3:137-46.
27.
Chaudhury N, Paliwal R, Phatak A. Co-morbidities among silicotics at Shakarpur: A follow up study. Lung India. 2012;29(1):6-10. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Madhavan P, Raj S. Budhpura ‘ground zero’ sandstone quarrying in India. Study commissioned by India committee of the Netherlands, Netherlands. 2005;32. Available from: http://www.indianet.nl/budhpura.pdf.
29.
Peng Y, Li X, Cai S, Chen Y, Dai W, Liu W, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of COPD among pneumoconiosis patients at an occupational disease prevention institute: A cross-sectional study. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2018;18(1):22. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Obukhova TY, Budkar LN, Gurvich VB, Solodushkin SI, Shmonina OG, Karpova EA. Influence exerted by somatic pathology on risks of occupational lung fibrosis in workers employed at refractory production. Health Risk Analysis. 2020;3:124-130.
31.
Rezende AA, de Amorim JC, Cosmo AM. Respiratory effects of silica inhalation among marble industry workers. Rev Med Minas Gerais. 2014;24(1):52-57. [crossref]
32.
Tiwari RR, Sharma YK. Respiratory health of female stone grinders with free silica dust exposure in Gujarat, India. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2008;14(4):280-82. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Rosenman KD, Reilly MJ, Gardiner J. Results of spirometry among individuals in a silicosis registry. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52(12):1173-78. [crossref][PubMed]
34.
Yang S, Chan CK, Wang MH, Leung CC, Tai LB, Tse LA. Association of spirometric restriction with mortality in the silicotics: A cohort study. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2023;23(1):327. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Obi ON, Baughman RP. Mixed obstructive and restrictive ventilatory defect in sarcoidosis: A new phenotype? Chest. 2020;158(5):1816-17. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Barnes H, Goh NS, Leong TL, Hoy R. Silica-associated lung disease: An old-world exposure in modern industries. Respirology. 2019;24(12):1165-75. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Kerget B, Araz O, YilmazelUcar E, Karaman A, Calik M, Alper F, et al. Female workers’ silicosis diagnosis delayed due to gender bias. Occupational Medicine. 2019;69(3):219-22. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Nery LE, Florencio RT, Sandoval PR, Rodrigues RT, Alonso G, Mason GR, et al. Additive effects of exposure to silica dust and smoking on pulmonary epithelial permeability: A radioaerosol study with technetium-99m labelled DTPA. Thorax. 1993;48(3):264-68.[crossref][PubMed]
39.
Pascual S, Urrutia I, Ballaz A, Arrizubieta I, Altube L, Salinas C. Prevalence of silicosis in a marble factory after exposure to quartz conglomerates. Archivos de Bronconeumologia. 2010;47(1):50-51. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Sill J. The effects of smoking on pulmonary function testing. Chest. 2016;149(4):A591. [crossref]
41.
Hnizdo E, Sluis-Cremer GK, Baskind E, Murray J. Emphysema and airway obstruction in non-smoking South African gold miners with long exposure to silica dust. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1994;51(8):557-63.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/73685.20299

Date of Submission: Jul 05, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Aug 15, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Sep 19, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 08, 2024
• Manual Googling: Sep 14 2024
• iThenticate Software: Sep 16, 2024 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com