Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 12767

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : November | Volume : 18 | Issue : 11 | Page : DC06 - DC11 Full Version

Pharmaceutical Analysis and Evaluation of In-vitro Antibacterial Activity of Gomutra Ghana: A Concentrated and Solidified Form of Cow’s Urine


Published: November 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68991.20274
Payal Ashok Raut, Bharat Jagdish Rathi, Anita Santoshrao Wanjari, Supriya Mukunda Meshram

1. Postgraduate Scholar, Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Bharat Jagdish Rathi,
Mahatma Gandhi Ayurved College Hospital and Research Centre, Salod (H), Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: bharatrathi174@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Cow’s urine has been described as a highly effective animal-derived substance. Its therapeutic and pharmacological actions make it effective in the treatment of a variety of disorders. One of its notable properties is its antibacterial action, where the drug’s ability to target and inhibit the growth of bacteria. However, due to the pungent odour and taste of cow’s urine, it is difficult to consume in its natural form. Additionally, the collection of fresh cow’s urine can be challenging, especially in urban areas where access to cows may be limited. So, it is important to modify it into a dosage form, like Gomutra Ghana, which improves palatability and shelf life.

Aim: To study the pharmaceutical development, quality control assessment, and in-vitro antibacterial activity evaluation of Gomutra Ghana.

Materials and Methods: The pharmaceutical and analytical studies were carried out in Mahatma Gandhi Ayurved College Hospital and Research Centre and Dattatraya Ayurved Pharmacy, Salod (H), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. The in-vitro (antibacterial) study was carried out in JNMC, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India, from April 2022 to August 2023. The in-vitro antibacterial study of cow’s urine and Gomutra Ghana was performed on five bacterial strains. Fresh cow’s urine was collected from a goshala (cowshed), and Gomutra Ghana was prepared in three batches by boiling the cow’s urine to a thicker consistency, then sun-drying it, followed by drying in an electric dryer. The final product was stored in a clean, sealed glass jars. Analytical parameters like pH, loss on drying at 105ÂșC, total ash, water-soluble ash, acid-insoluble ash, water-soluble extractives, alcohol-soluble extractives, and microbial contamination were studied. The in-vitro antibacterial activity was evaluated using the agar disc diffusion method at concentrations of 5 μL, 10 μL, and 15 μL, with results compared to those of a broad-spectrum and commonly used antibiotic, ciprofloxacin (5 μg). Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0, employing Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to compare three groups (Ciprofloxacin, cow’s urine, and Gomutra Ghana) at all three concentrations. A significance level was set with a p-value of <0.05 for the antibacterial study.

Results: High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) showed a peak from cow’s urine and Gomutra Ghana, with maximum heights of 500.1 and 450.4, which were nearly the same, so they may contain similar constituents. An extra peak was observed in Gomutra Ghana, suggesting the presence of additional compounds formed during its preparation. Gomutra Ghana extract showed the highest zone of inhibition against Escherichia coli.

Conclusion: Gomutra Ghana showed antibacterial properties, which warrant further exploration in humans for safety and efficacy in humans.

Keywords

Agar disc diffusion method, Antimicrobial study, Panchagavya chikitsa, Rasakriya kalpana

Ayurveda is a traditional Indian medicine system that has been practiced since the Vedic period (1). Ayurvedic Pharmaceutics, also known as “Bhaishajya Kalpana,” is a discipline of pharmacy that deals with the formulation, manufacturing, and dispensing of herbal medicinal formulations (2). The cow is considered sacred in Indian culture, and its byproducts, particularly cow’s urine, have been studied for therapeutic purposes (3). Cow’s urine is also an important component of Panchagavya Chikitsa, often known as Cowpathy (4). Drinking cow’s urine distillate has been used to treat numerous disorders in India for thousands of years due to its pharmacological characteristics. However, it has a short shelf life and a pungent odour, which makes it undesirable for many patients (5); thus, modifications in its dosage forms are necessary.

A decoction is one of the fundamental preparations in Ayurvedic pharmaceutics. Various modified dosage forms of decoction are utilised to increase potency, extend shelf life, and improve palatability (6). Ghana is one such second derivative dosage form, where water-soluble metabolites are extracted by heating to obtain a concentrated semisolid form. This semisolid mass is then dried at 50°C (7). The antimicrobial activity of cow urine and distillate was examined using the agar well method against microorganisms such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Bacillus subtilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus vulgaris. The results indicated that fresh cow’s urine was superior to its distillate (8). It has also been reported that phenols can kill both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria; thus, the presence of phenols in cow’s urine may be responsible for its significant antibacterial properties. The data from the study also supported traditional practitioners’ claims regarding the antimicrobial activity of cow’s urine (9).

As scientific standards for evaluating the efficacy, stability, and safety of drugs are developed, there is an increasing need to standardise Ayurvedic formulations. The term “standardisation” refers to the employment of appropriate techniques and procedures to establish the optimal conditions for manufacturing products that meet specific requirements for purity, quality, safety, stability, and shelf life. Although many drugs are clinically successful, they are still not standardised according to the Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India (API) (10). Cow urine distillate has shown significant antibacterial activity (11). As the availability of fresh cow’s urine has always remained a problem, especially in urban areas where access to cows may be limited, this study aims to modify it into Ghana form. However, the pharmaceutical processing and quality control methods of Gomutra Ghana remain questionable. The issues of standardisation, profiling or characterisation, and quality control remain challenges to the global acceptance of Gomutra Ghana.

Therefore, the study aimed to evaluate the pharmaceutical development and quality control assessment of Gomutra Ghana, as well as to assess its in-vitro antibacterial activity.

Material and Methods

This was an in-vitro study. Pharmaceutical processing and analytical studies were performed in the Department of Rasashastra and Bhaishajya Kalpana at Mahatma Gandhi Ayurved College Hospital and Research Centre and Dattatraya Ayurved Pharmacy, Salod (H), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. The in-vitro (antibacterial) study was carried out in JNMC, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India, from April 2022 to August 2023. Ethical approval No. MGACHRC/IEC/July 2021/358 was taken before the start of the study.

Sample collection: The region around the urethral opening in the cow was washed and cleaned properly early in the morning, then midstream cow’s urine was collected in a sterile container. Fresh cow’s urine was collected from Sarvoday Goshala Charitable Trust, Padegaon, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Preparation of Gomutra Ghana: Gomutra Ghana is a rasakriya (linctus) and ghanasara (semisolid dosage form) product that contains only cow’s urine. It was prepared according to the general method of rasakriya by boiling the cow’s urine until it reached a thicker consistency, as cited by Dalhana, the commentator of the Sushruta Samhita (12). Fresh cow’s urine was collected from a Goshala (cowshed) and filtered to remove foreign matter using a clean, dry muslin cloth. The filtered urine was then placed in a stainless steel vessel and heated over a low flame at approximately 100°C. Continuous stirring was done to avoid adhesiveness and burning. The consistency was checked periodically until the desired thickness was achieved. For the drying process, it was kept uncovered in sunlight for two days and then placed in an electric dryer before being stored in a clean, sealed glass jar (Table/Fig 1). Gomutra Ghana was prepared in three batches, with fresh cow’s urine collected from the same cow every two days.

Analytical study: There are no pharmacopeial standards for Gomutra Ghana; therefore, analytical research was done to establish basic parameters. The formulation and fresh cow’s urine were initially evaluated for organoleptic parameters such as colour, taste, and odour. In the analytical laboratory, samples were analysed as per API Standards (13). The physicochemical analysis included pH (14), loss on drying at 105ÂșC (15), total ash (16), water-soluble ash (16), acid-insoluble ash (16), water-soluble extractives (17), alcohol-soluble extractives (18), and assessment for microbial contamination (19). Analysis was done in all batches.

High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC) (20): The chromatographic analysis was conducted using the Camag Linomat IV and a Hamilton syringe (100 mL) for sample application. The development chamber employed was the Camag Twin Trough Chamber, with dimensions of 10×10 cm2. The solvent system employed was Toluene: Ethyl Acetate in a 7:3 ratio. The HPTLC analysis was performed at 254 nm. The procedure included preparation of the plates, preparation of the chamber, sample application, plate conditioning, chromatography development, detection spot, scanning, and documentation.

Antibacterial study: The in-vitro antibacterial study was carried out using the agar disc diffusion method.

Test organism: Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 (American Type Culture Collection) and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, were used. Gram-negative bacteria like Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 27736, and Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14028 for the antimicrobial study.

Preparation of extracts: A 10 mL sample of ethanol was added to 10 mL of cow’s urine in a conical flask, which was then instantly covered and shaken. A mixture of 100 mL of ethanol and 1 g of Gomutra Ghana was shaken on a rotary shaker at 80 rpm for five hours per day over three days. The extract was subsequently filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper and kept in a three different 10 mL vials at 5°C for future use (21).

Preparation of culture media for the study: Aseptic technique was employed to pour 30 mL of molten sterile Mueller Hinton agar (HiMedia Lab Pvt. Ltd.) into each sterile petri dish, allowing it to solidify at room temperature. The inoculum was spread across the agar surface using a sterile swab to prepare a lawn of microorganisms (22).

Disc preparation for antimicrobial study: Whatman No. 1 filter paper was used to prepare 5 mm discs with the help of a sterile punching machine. These discs were sterilised by autoclaving at 121°C. Then the moist discs were dried in a hot air oven at 50°C. The sterile discs were kept in a small sterile bottle for further use. A Ciprofloxacin 5 μg disc was used as a standard to compare results with those from cow’s urine and Gomutra Ghana.

Antibacterial activity by disc diffusion method: A single isolated colony of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 was taken and placed into nutrient broth, which was then cultured at 37°C for 3-4 hours. The same procedure was followed for the remaining four organisms. The inoculum was evenly distributed across the entire surface of the Mueller-Hinton agar plates using a sterile cotton swab to test antibacterial sensitivity. A Ciprofloxacin 5 μg disc and the three previously prepared sterile discs were placed at a distance of 15 mm from the edge and 24 mm apart on the plate. Subsequently, 5 μL, 10 μL, and 15 μL concentrations of the prepared extracts were passed in the discs using a micropipette, onto they were positioned 15 mm from the edge and 24 mm apart. The plates were then incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. The diameter of the zone of bacterial growth inhibition around each disc was measured and recorded (21). The susceptibility or resistance to the agent in each plate for the Ciprofloxacin 5 μg disc was assessed using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute’s standardised table (23). The zones of inhibition for cow’s urine and Gomutra Ghana were then compared to the results for Ciprofloxacin.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 27.0. The statistical test used for the analysis was ANOVA, which compared three groups: Ciprofloxacin, Cow’s urine, and Gomutra Ghana, across all three concentrations. The significance level for the antibacterial study was set at a p-value of <0.05.

Results

Gomutra ghana observations: The preparation of Gomutra Ghana using two liters of fresh cow’s urine consistently yielded around 80 grams before drying and approximately 58 grams after drying across all three batches, with a standardised drying time of 180 minutes at 50ÂșC. The final yield showed little variation, indicating a consistent and reliable preparation process (Table/Fig 2).

Temperature observations: The temperature observations showed consistent increases across all three batches (GG-I, GG-II, GG-III) throughout the preparation of Gomutra Ghana. Starting from room temperature (~38°C) and the cow’s urine temperature (~36°C), the temperature rose gradually, reaching around 90-92°C at 30 minutes, 105-107°C at one hour, and stabilised at approximately 110-112°C from two hours onward. These observations indicate a uniform heating pattern, resulting in the characteristic brown colour and thicker consistency of the final Gomutra Ghana product after 4.5 hours (Table/Fig 3).

Results of organoleptic characteristics of Gomutra Ghana: The organoleptic characteristics were consistent across all three batches. The appearance was light brown, the taste was bitter and astringent, and no specific odour was observed.

Physicochemical parameters: The pH values of Gomutra Ghana ranged from 8.93 to 9.20, indicating an alkaline nature. The loss on drying at 105ÂșC was around 0.5%, and the total ash content was approximately 50%. The water-soluble ash and acid-insoluble ash were consistently around 8.5% and 5.9%, respectively. The water-soluble extractives were highly consistent at around 83%, while the alcohol-soluble extractives showed slight variability, ranging from 68% to 72%. These results demonstrate the reproducibility and stability of the physicochemical properties of Gomutra Ghana (Table/Fig 4).

Results of microbial load/microbial specification in Gomutra Ghana: The total viable count was a maximum of 105/g, with Klebsiella pneumoniae at a maximum of 103/g, and the total fungal count also at a maximum of 103/g. Escherichia coli showed a maximum of 105/g, while Salmonella Typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed no growth in all three batches.

HPTLC analysis: The cow’s urine was found to have a total of six peaks with maximum Rf values (0.59, 0.78, and 1.0) and maximum areas of 5859.9, 8127.6, and 7188.7. While in Gomutra Ghana exhibited a total of seven peaks at 254 nm, with maximum Rf values (0.42, 0.80, and 1.02) and maximum areas of 5586.5, 6716.3, and 6729 (Table/Fig 5). At 254 nm, images were obtained of both cow’s urine and Gomutra Ghana, showing the separation and identification of different compounds based on their Retention Factor (RF) values and peak areas (Table/Fig 6).

Comparison of antibacterial activity: The comparison of the methanol extract of cow’s urine and Gomutra Ghana with ciprofloxacin at different concentrations reveals notable antimicrobial activity against various microorganisms. For both extracts, the highest zone of inhibition was observed at a concentration of 15 μL. The cow’s urine extract showed the most significant inhibition against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (20 mm) and Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14028 (20 mm), with slightly lower effectiveness against other strains. Gomutra Ghana exhibited the highest inhibition against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (20 mm) as well, followed by Klebsiella pneumonia ATCC 27736 (19 mmm). Ciprofloxacin, the positive control, consistently demonstrated higher inhibition zones across all microorganisms, particularly against Escherichia coli (29 mm) and Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14028 (25 mm). Both extracts displayed dose-dependent antimicrobial activity, with increasing inhibition zones at higher concentrations (Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9).

A statistical comparison of the antibacterial activity among ciprofloxacin, cow’s urine, and Gomutra Ghana at three different concentrations (5 μL, 10 μL, and 15 μL) shows significant differences in the zone of inhibition (indicative of antibacterial effectiveness) among these groups at each concentration tested. Specifically, at 5 μL, the p-value of 0.0121 suggests a statistically significant difference in antibacterial activity. At 10 μL, the p-value of 0.0117 similarly indicates significant differences, and at 15 μL, the p-value of 0.0067 reaffirms significant variations in effectiveness.

The study also examines the zone of inhibition across different bacterial strains, where variability exists (5.52 to 7.79 mm) among the strains tested. These findings underscore the diverse antibacterial potentials of ciprofloxacin, cow’s urine, and Gomutra Ghana, potentially reflecting their distinct chemical compositions and mechanisms of action against bacterial pathogens (Table/Fig 10).

Discussion

Gomutra Ghana, a second derivative preparation of cow’s urine, is one of the extraction process in which cow’s urine is heated until it is turned into a concentrated semisolid form (24). This semisolid substance is then dried at 50°C, and the final product is termed as Gomutra Ghana. The study addresses the challenge of accessing fresh cow’s urine, particularly in urban areas, by transforming it into the Ghana form. Hence, in the present study, an attempt was done to study pharmaceutical development, quality control assessment, and in-vitro antibacterial activity evaluation of Gomutra Ghana.

The pharmaceutical study dealt with the preparation of a suitable dosage form of a drug material. For the quality assurance of the finished product, it is essential to evaluate and discuss the in-process conditions. Gomutra Ghana was prepared according to the Rasakriya general method in three batches. The temperature was recorded at every stage of every batch. Since mild heat was maintained, the temperature did not rise high. During the preparation of Gomutra Ghana, the transparent yellow colour of cow’s urine changed to brown. The quantity of the obtained product was much less 2.83% to 2.97%, as cow’s urine consists of 96% water (25), which evaporated during the heating process. Additionally, since Gomutra Ghana showed a hygroscopic nature due to the alkaline property of cow’s urine (26), a glass airtight jar was preferred for storage to prevent moisture content and contamination.

The pH of Gomutra Ghana indicates that it is much more alkaline than all three batches. This range of pH facilitates antacid action (27). The loss on drying at 105°C indicates the presence of moisture content. If the moisture content exceeds the permissible limit, the formulation is more likely to be infected by fungal growth. Moreover unwanted changes can also occur due to the presence of excess moisture (28). The moisture level in the prepared Gomutra Ghana for all batches was significantly lower and within the standard limit of 0.49% to 0.52%, suggesting that this formulation may be more stable and authentic.

The residue remaining after the incineration of the crude drug is designated as ash. Ash values help determine the quality and purity of crude drugs, especially in powdered form (29). The total ash of a crude drug also reflects the care taken in its preparation. No significant difference was detected in the ash values of all the batches. Currently, there are no pharmacopeial standards for Ghana; hence, these values can be considered as a reference for further studies on the physicochemical parameters of Ghana.

The extractive values, namely water-soluble and alcohol-soluble, reflect the amount of active ingredient in a given amount of material when extracted with the corresponding solvents (30). The water-soluble extractive value was higher compared to the alcohol-soluble extractive value in all batches of Gomutra Ghana.

The results of the microbial contamination analysis showed that Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were not present in any of the three batches. This makes it suitable for therapeutic administration, as it was prepared under the best hygienic conditions with sterilised instruments.

For HPTLC analysis of cow’s urine and Gomutra Ghana, several solvent mixtures were experimented with, and a standard HPTLC solvent system comprising Toluene: Ethyl Acetate (7:3 v/v) was successfully developed. In Gomutra Ghana, one extra peak was found as compared to cow’s urine, indicating the formation of a new compound during the preparation process of Gomutra Ghana. The peaks from cow’s urine and Gomutra Ghana with maximum heights were 500.1 and 450.4, respectively, which were nearly the same, indicating the compounds have similar constituents, as the only ingredient in Gomutra Ghana was cow’s urine. This HPTLC pattern can be considered a reference standard for further quality control studies.

For the in-vitro antibacterial study, after experimenting with different solvents and concentrations, ethanol was selected for the extract. Antibacterial activity was assessed using the Agar disc diffusion method, which showed varying diameters of the zone of results on different bacterial strains.

When comparing the zones of inhibition, ciprofloxacin exhibited susceptibility to all the selected microorganisms and demonstrated greater antibacterial activity compared to both cow’s urine and Gomutra Ghana extracts. The highest zone of inhibition for cow’s urine extract was observed against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (20 mm) and Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14028 (20 mm). Gomutra Ghana extract also showed the highest inhibition against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (20 mm). In general, the best results for the zone of inhibition were found at a concentration of 15 μL.

The results of the antibacterial study on cow’s urine were consistent with the previously studied antibacterial activity of cow’s urine (Ahuja A et al., Randhawa GK and Sharma R et al., (31),(32). In the study by Ahuja A et al., it was found that urine from various cows exhibited varying antibacterial characteristics (31). The antibacterial effects of cow urine may vary due to its chemical components, which can change for multiple reasons. When all three samples-Ciprofloxacin, cow’s urine, and Gomutra Ghana-were compared with five types of bacteria at three different concentrations, statistically significant results were obtained across various samples and bacteria.

Cow urine possesses significant antimicrobial, germicidal, and antifungal properties due to the presence of many volatile and non volatile components such as urea, creatinine, aurum hydroxide, phenol, carboxylic acid, and calcium and manganese salts. This germicidal function is further enhanced by the presence of certain amino acids and urine peptides, which contribute to improving bacterial cell wall integrity and surface hydrophobicity (33).

The research addresses challenges related to accessibility and quality control, and shows the feasibility and assure of Gomutra Ghana as a standardised Ayurvedic formulation. Its stated antibacterial activity highlights its therapeutic potential and opens the way for further investigation into its wider pharmacological characteristics and potential applications in healthcare.

Limitation(s)

The animal and clinical evaluation of Gomutra Ghana was not performed. There may be variations in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug between animal and human bodies, which could lead to potential differences in the results of clinical studies.

Conclusion

The Gomutra Ghana can be consistently prepared, yielding a stable, reproducible product with low moisture content, a stable alkaline pH, and consistent ash values. Microbial analysis confirmed the absence of contaminants, ensuring purity. HPTLC analysis identified some new compound formations, providing a reference standard for quality control. Antibacterial testing showed significant activity against various bacterial strains, particularly Escherichia coli, although it was less effective than ciprofloxacin. Therefore, Gomutra Ghana can be considered a promising Ayurvedic formulation with potential therapeutic applications. Future research should focus on broader pharmacological evaluations, studies of the mechanism of action, and clinical trials to validate these findings and optimise therapeutic use, potentially integrating Gomutra Ghana into modern healthcare practices.

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank DMIHER, for motivating and providing the necessary help for writing this article and Sarvoday Goshala Charitable Trust, Padhegaon, Wardha, Maharashtra, for providing fresh cow’s urine for the study.

References

1.
Parasuraman S, Thing GS, Dhanaraj SA. Polyherbal formulation: Concept of Ayurveda. Pharmacognosy Reviews. 2014;8(16):73. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Rathi B, Rathi R. Pharmaceutical standardization of Bakuchivati: A modified dosage form of Dhatryadi Yoga. Int J Res Ayurveda and Pharmacy. 2017;8(1):57-61. [crossref]
3.
Raut AA, Vaidya AD. Panchgavya and cow products: A trail for the holy grail. J Ayurveda and Integrative Med. 2018;9(1):64-66. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Chauhan RS. Panchagavya therapy: Current status and future directions. Indian Cow Sci Eco J. 2019;1:03-07.
5.
Sharma U, Verma A, Yadav Y, Sharma K. Review of Kwatha Kalpana and its modified forms. Int J Ayurvedic and Herbal Med. 2020;10(6):3911-16.
6.
Dhote M, Rathi B, Dongre R. Pharmaceutical evaluation of VidangadiLepaguti- an Ayurvedic topical formulation. Int J Ayurvedic Med. 2020;11(2):212-17. [crossref]
7.
Chaudhary P, Rathi B, Rathi R, Tyagi V, Lamba N. Evaluation of efficacy of phalatrikadighanvati in patients of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through reverse pharmacology approach–study protocol. J Pharmaceutical Res Int. 2021;33(59A):88-96. [crossref]
8.
Jarald E, Edwin S, Tiwari V, Garg R, Toppo E. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of cow urine. Glob J Pharmacol. 2008;2(2):20-22.
9.
Linton AH, Dick HM. Principles of bacteriology, virology and immunity. Bacillus. 1990;2:187-210.
10.
Joshi VK, Joshi A, Dhiman KS. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, development and perspectives. J Ethnopharmacology. 2017;197:32-38. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Athasivam AK, Muthuselvam M, Rajendran R. Antimicrobial activities of cow urine distillate against some clinical pathogens. Glob J Pharmacol. 2019;4(1):41-44.
12.
Angadi R. A text book of BhaisajyakalpanaVigyan, Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakasha, Ed-2020; Varanasi. p.124.
13.
Angadi R. A text book of Bhaisajyakalpana Vigyan, Chaukhamba Surbharati Prakashan, Ed-2020; Varanasi. p. 496-497.
14.
Anonymous, Laboratory guide for the analysis of Ayurveda and Siddha formulations, CCRAS, New Delhi: Govt of India: Dept. of AYUSH, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2019; p. 42-44.
15.
Anonymous. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopeia of India, Govt of India Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Delhi. 2019;2(1):163.
16.
Anonymous, The Ayurvedic Pharmacopeia of India, Govt of India Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Delhi, Part-1, Vol.-1, 2019; p139.
17.
Anonymous, The Ayurvedic Pharmacopeia of India, Govt of India Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Delhi, 1st edition, Govt. Part-1, Vol.-1, 2019; p174.
18.
Anonymous, The Ayurvedic Pharmacopeia of India, Govt of India Ministry of Health & Family Welfare Delhi, Part-2, Vol.-1, 2019; p144.
19.
Choi S, Puligundla P, Mok C. Microbial decontamination of dried Alaska pollock shreds using corona discharge plasma jet: Effects on physicochemical and sensory characteristics. J Food Sci. 2019;81(4):07-10.[crossref]
20.
Kathiriya B. An open explanatory clinical trial with a pre-test and post-test design evaluating the combined therapeutic effect of Shashilekha Vati and Gomutra Ghan Vati in Shwitra. Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India) ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 2020: 99-105.
21.
Rajeswari S, Poongothai E, Hemalatha N. Antimicrobial activities of cow dung extracts against human pathogens. Int J Curr Pharm Res. 2019;8(4):09-12. [crossref]
22.
Akinyemi KO, Oladapo O, Okwara CE, Ibe CC, Fasure KA. Screening of crude extracts of six medicinal plants used in South-West Nigerian unorthodox medicine for anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus activity. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2019;5:6. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). M 100. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Sep 02]. Available from: https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/ documents/m100.
24.
Baragi UC, Baragi PC, Vyas MK, Shukla VJ. Standardization and quality control parameters of Dashanga Kwatha ghana tablet: An Ayurvedic formulation. Int J Ayurveda Res. 2020;2(1):42-47. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Kebreab E, France J, Beever DE, Castillo AR. Nitrogen pollution by dairy cows and its mitigation by dietary manipulation. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2001;60:275-85. [crossref]
26.
Jarald E, Edwin S, Tiwari V, Garg R, Toppo E. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of cow urine. Glob J Pharmacol. 2019;2(2):20-22.
27.
De Ruigh A, Roman S, Chen J, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas P. Gaviscon Double Action Liquid (antacid & alginate) is more effective than antacid in controlling post-prandial oesophageal acid exposure in GERD patients: A double-blind crossover study. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2020;40(5):531-37. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Seager H. Drug-delivery products and the Zydis fast-dissolving dosage form. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1998;50(4):375-82. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Kumar M, Mondal P, Borah S, Mahato K. Physico-chemical evaluation, preliminary phytochemical investigation, fluorescence and TLC analysis of leaves of the plant Lasia spinosa (Lour) Thwaites. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2019;5(2):306-10.
30.
Brunner G. Supercritical fluids: Technology and application to food processing. J Food Engineering. 2020;67(1-2):21-33. [crossref]
31.
Ahuja A, Kumar P, Verma A, Tanwar R. Antimicrobial activities of cow urine against various bacterial strains. Int J Recent Adv Pharm Res. 2012;2(2):84-87.
32.
Randhawa GK, Sharma R. Chemotherapeutic potential of cow urine: A review. J Intercultural Ethnopharmacology. 2015;4(2):180. [crossref]
33.
Minocheherhomji FP. Bioenhancing properties of cow urine a review. Int J Innov Res Sci. 2016;5(9):16283-87.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/68991.20274

Date of Submission: Dec 08, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Feb 10, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jul 20, 2024
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 11, 2023
• Manual Googling: Feb 13, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jul 19, 2024 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com